This is one of the most popular videos on to what extent the ARDC wants attorneys to have a code of silence, to not warn their clients of court fraud in Illinois, and to always take the side of Judges and other attorneys–even though the fact they are not following the law despite being officers of the court.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Important–From Glenda Martinez–A video story you won’t want to miss
I highly recommend this video as a typical story I learn about at least once or twice per week–and for which the court does absolutely nothing about.
This week I learned one client after asking and begging for one mother to see her son (it has been months and she could not see him, not for Christmas or New Year’s) and a sister. They were awarded visitation once per week, but the wife never allowed it, said it was never a good time. We have a year of recordings of this. The court just told both the mother will never see her son again, and the sister will never see her brother again. The wife claims this man is too demented to recognize them, so why bother? (This woman is just another living heat donor if you ask me, and has no right to be a guardian).
another video story from Ontario:
And of course, we have the Alan Frake case who is about as drugged as the man in this video. Al Frake is at Sunrise Nursing home in Park Ridge and son Gary Frake reports they are killing him with sedatives/psychotropic drugs. This has been reported to Judge Quinn several times and it is always deny, deny, deny.
So thank you Glenda for sending along this shinning example of elder abuse by the “professionals” who are just about always allowed to abuse with impunity.
JoAnne
From Ken Ditkowsky–Pick a month, any month, and see why Illinois is No. 1 in Corruption
And then ponder why the ARDC wants every attorney in Illinois to adhere to a code of silence and let our clients fall into corruption traps because we cannot warn them and cannot warn the public and we MUST ignore 18 USC sec 4 so that we risk prison and fines for not showing our clients how to report and freely discussing this matter on our fraud in the court blogs.
Go figure.
After Dectective Burge, is the Chicago Police Dept still practicing Torture?
http://sputniknews.com/us/20150305/1019076125.html
An interesting article from Eliot Bernstein who provides much thought to this blog
I would like to know and I invite this attorney to provide more information for the blog.
Just how dangerous is this blog? AM I STILL THE MOST DANGEROUS BLOGGER IN ILLINOIS? YES!
Dear Readers;
One of the more interesting tactics the ARDC has taken to, is to repeatedly send me their crappy papers decrying their lack of appreciation for this blog because it tells all that goes on in probate, it told the “secrets” of the Sykes case, that it had no jurisdiction, there was a safe deposit box drilled out by the Guardian, emptied and no one told the judge about that, that $1 million in valuable coins are missing per the records of the estate attorney (Ditkowsky), the judge refused discovery to opposing parties, the case was railroaded.
If there has been attorneys and judges acting badly in probate, you heard it here. The public has a right to know and be warned, esp. if the court of appeals and Illinois Supreme Court do nothing, the ARDC does nothing and even covers up.
The ARDC was granted subpoena power to solve the missing coins of the Sykes case and instead it moved to quash Gloria’s and my subpoenas in a shameful move.
It railroaded Ken Ditkowsky’s case, shamefully twisting around his letter to Dr. Patel and making a mockery out of justice.
Well apparently opposing counsel Mr. Steve Splitt could not deal with the massive record on appeal, I have seen him in oral argument and he was quite fastidious in Ken’s appeal on getting the vast majority of facts correct and cited to the record. So now apparently he is in a crunch.
So what is the status of my case?
Well apparently the ARDC has taken to serving me no less than 3 or 4 times, sometimes in person, once even at court in front of a client! (who knows all about their trickery and supports me in all I do, so to them it is proof of the false persecution by the ARDC) with a Petition for my Interrim (Immediate) suspension for running this blog not to their liking:
here is the current status:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwaVNEVkRCZ2RCM1E&authuser=0
And if you read thru the documents, here is the statement that proves according to Jerome Larkin, Melissa Smart, Sharon Opryszek and now Steven Splitt I AM STILL THE MOST DANGEROUS BLOGGER IN ILLINOIS
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwaVNEVkRCZ2RCM1E&authuser=0
Favorite statement (everyone likes this one)
It appearing…that a complaint has been voted against you by the Inquiry Board; that you have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct; that you have engaged in conduct involving fraud or moral turpitude or which threatens irreparable injury to the public, your clients or the orderly administration of justice…[we basically want to suspend you right away. NOW. Get the blankety blankety out].
Most of my clients can’t believe it at all, so I’m having them write up declarations for the Illinois Supreme Court. Here are a few:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwaFZESm96VVpveGc&authuser=0
All of the comments are unsolicited. I am still waiting for more affidavits and declarations to come back and then I will publish.
I currently have 30 + clients I have promised pro bono work that need it. Will the ARDC and Ill. Supreme Court help these people when I am gone.
I have plenty of patent work to do. I could have just done that since Nov. of 2011 when I created this blog, just to be selfish, to look the other way. But I stepped up and took my oath as an attorney and counselor seriously, so I had to help the disableds and their families who had no one to turn to.
So you can you. Please sign my declaration and return it and I’m sure that one day I can help you too.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwVkh2dUVfbjRFOGM&authuser=0
And if the ARDC suspends me and they get their way, I will promise to blog as much as I can, watch the proceedings in court and talk to the victims as much as I can without giving any legal advice. One of the issues that the ARDC isn’t counting on is the fact once I am suspended then I can approach people in the hall ways and give them brochures and business cards and ask if they have complaints about the probate system and I will be glad to publicize their own stories. I hope to collect a lot more stories about probate this way.
I will continue to support the disabled victims of probate and their families and try to find them other low cost or pro bono counsel, tho it’s very hard. There are 83,000+ attorneys in Illinois and few are interested in pro bono work and fewer still will go up against the probate cabal.
While there is a sore need for what I do, there is little chance of help coming to you many probate victims out there.
While the Illinois Supreme Court says it wants to help the little guy, make the courts more just, it appears to be little more than lip service with the fact that the ARDC does nothing, helps in the cleansings and cover ups, SCOI appoints Zimmerman to “investigate” the ARDC problems–an attorney known to do nothing, and the beat goes on.
I can do only what I am allowed to do. I will continue to blog. I will continue to pray and hold vigils for victims and their terrorized families.
As for me, I will be happily writing patents as a patent agent and probably working on some of my own patents to make more money.
What I currently do with this blog and in probate is exhausting work with little pay, so working on the blog and patents will be a relief for me, even though I know you all probate victims will suffer for it. I will continue to pray for you.
JoAnne
JoAnne
Survey says Illinois Nursing Homes are the worst….but the money is just too darned good.
So then why does anyone put an elder in a nursing home in Illinois?
Let me tell you why. It’s the worst kept secret.
Everyday Guardians in Probate put their disableds into nursing homes–often against their will. (Wyman, Gore, Drabik, etc.) This is not the law. The Americans with Disabilities act 42 USC 12203 says that there must be reasonable accommodations to enable a disabled person to live fully as a normal bodied one. The US DOJ put out a missive that major efforts, if at all possible, should be made to ensure that disableds age in place. (published elsewhere on this blog). So what gives?
Big business gives, that is. It costs about $1,000 per month to house and feed a senior on cheap food. The staff to patient ratio is about 10 to 1. So if no one cares, grandma and grandpa go straight to the nursing home, against their will and with the full support of mega nursing home care.
It’s the worst kept secret in the US.
And where is the 18th floor Cook County Probate Court on all of this? Right in the trenches with big business. In the Frake case, they have taken a large, strong physical man right before a guardianship, he has suffered unknown pain in his hip (which Ted Rhodes denies), and he is being drugged on psychotropic drugs to the point his son visits and says his voice is barely audible and all dad says to him is he wants to die! He is now a weak, debilitated, frail man in a wheelchair with leg and arm muscles mostly atrophied just a year or so later after the nursing home call.
The family is aghast (sister Semrow, counsin Mike Messer) but nothing is ever done. Judge Quinn sends reports of abuse right back to the abusers (Rhodes, Kerry Peck, etc.) and everything goes no where in circles.
Father Frake wants to live at home. He flew into a rage one day when 2 of the caretakers sent over by Tom Kleinhenz had sex in his guest bedroom. So who was punished for this? The workers? Mr. Kleinhenz? For sure not. Judge Quinn sent Father Frake to Sunrise Nursing home where he likely suffered a fall, was confined to a wheelchair due to undiagnosed hip pain (son Frake report) and he was also chemically restrained and kept in a wheelchair. His eyes are dilated, he can barely lift his head and he tells his son he wants to die. Of course Rhodes/Peck denies all this as Quinn sends reports of abuse back to the abusers!
You can’t make this tragic stuff up.
So the nursing homes will continue to trap and sedate. The probate court will funnel and make the nursing homes owners happy and no one will ever find out if the attorneys and/or the judges own any interests in nursing homes that support this evil, massive, big business. No one will ever report on the dividends paid to the judges and the court appointed attorneys that make a bee line for funneling the elderly into this profit heavy (and medicare fraud heavy –see gillman and other articles) nursing homes.
Go figure
From a former Ala. State Supreme Court Judge–what happense when judges are for sale (campaign contributions)
In this particular article, this judge explains how impossible it is to raise the $5 million (yes, that’s millions) to run for the Alabama Surpreme Court and how she felt when she had to collect campaign dollars (mostly from the lawyers and their firms in front of her) in order to win a successful campaign, and then how she felt biased afterward when ruling on cases in an impartial manner.
It brings up the concept of the courts being for sale and being big business.
Will we have to go to 2 court systems–one for big business and one for the individual? Would that solve the problem? Right now, according to recent studies, corporations win over individuals 70% of the time, which is a huge change to the 60/40 split of years gone by.
This judge talks openly and honestly about constantly asking for contributions and having to deal with money and lawyers that appear before her.
The problem is obvious to one on the 18th floor of the daley center
joanne
This photo says it all:
Seminars — from Elder Justice Center Cook County at Daley Center
SENIOR ENRICHMENT SEMINAR REMINDER!
There is still space available for the two attached March “Free” Senior Enrichment Seminars:
Thursday, March 5, 2015 – (11:30 am – 1:00 pm)
Topic: “Caring for Grandchildren: Guardianship and Visitation
Location: Courtroom 2005 – 20th Floor
Thursday, March 19, 2015 – (11:30 am – 1:30 pm)
Topic: “Financial Literacy“
Location: Room CL-115 – Concourse Level
Call the Elder Justice Center at (312) 603-9233 to reserve your seat.
Please mark your calendar for the above seminar dates. I would also appreciate it if you would begin sharing information on the above seminars with your friends, family and colleagues to ensure that this important information is made available to all who may be interested in learning more about the above topics.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Thank you,
Ernestine Durham
Court Coordinator
Cook County Elder Justice Center
50 West Washington Street
Concourse Level – Room CL16
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Phone: (312) 603-9233
From Glenda Martinez, she begs us to just say no to psychotropic drugging of our elders
Dear Glenda;
Thanks so much for writing the wonderful letter below and sharing it with our readers. We pray that you and Alan win on appeal and he will come home and away from his abusers.
JoAnne
| Having trouble viewing this email? Click here |
![]()
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
And while Illinois is protecting animals better (great idea) how about grandma and grandpa?
And now while the State of Illinois state’s attorney offices has decided to protect Fluffy and Fido and that’s a great idea, no dog or cat or kitten or puppy should ever be left out in extreme heat or cold all day (unless it’s a breed that does well, for example huskies do well and enjoy extreme cold and like to have plenty of play that is work for them, and Marie Coon Cats can do well in extreme cold. Likewise short haired chihuahua’s and hairless or Sphynx cats do well 90 degrees or above with water.
But grandma and grandpa have no protection from predators. Mary Sykes is in a place she never intended and when Ken Ditkowsky brought up the fact that he was advised during estate planning Mary had $1million in valuable collectible coins, the ARDC and courtroom 1804 and the attorneys appointed there worked strenuously to quash repeated subpoenas.
The ARDC refused to use its subpoena powers during my trial and Ken’s trial to find the coins. In addition, they moved during my trial to quash subpoenas to the bank.
The ARDC is supposed to be a truth and fact finder of highest integrity and ethics, and yet they repeatedly move to quash crucial evidence in an underlying case?
So, I am glad that cats and dogs can now go straight to the states attorneys to protect them from freezing, cold and starvation. That is indeed a good thing. they cannot speak for themselves.
But what about grandma and grandpa under the current regime of target, isolate, medicate, eliminate?
Watch this woman talk about going to her parents to try to visit, the police are called and there is no protective order against the visit, she tries to film what the guardians and attorneys are doing to her parents, the police falsely arrest her (this is Florida now, they ask her for her expensive video camera (they are not supposed to do this), she says no (better technique, ask if you will be arrested for failure to do so, if the answer is yes, offer to delete the footage and then delete something else–it’s all illegal), and then document what happened.
These case are so tied in, they are tied in with the police also. Note this is what happened to me in the Sykes case–asked to delete important footage taken of Mary indicating her higher cognitive thinking.
It is my understanding more footage will be coming. I will most likely post a page after I have seen it all.
JoAnne
From Iowa–another family member denied visitation on a whim and without a court order
As we all know, guardians deny visitation up and down, left and right, esp. when they want to put the disabled in a horrible nursing home, or isolate them, or abuse them by failing to diagnose certain conditions (Johnnie Durham, Alan Frake, etc.) and seek medical help.
http://freejimmyfromguardianship.blogspot.com/
Mary Sykes is still being isolated from 20+ former friends and family, for no good reason. Gloria has not seen her own mother she loving cared for and was a best friend with, for years now. All she gets is bizarre court orders, the run around and no where near her beloved mother.
What is really amazing to me, is that everyone knows this, but they let CT continue to be the guardian. If Gloria complains, they had the report of abuse right back to the abuser (guardian/and guardian’s attorney). The same is being done in the Al Frake case.
This blog would not exist unless there were serious violations of human and civil rights involved and the loss of personal liberties.
And for reporting the blog, Jerome Larkin, head of the Illinois ARDC suspended Ken Ditkowsky’s law license and is trying to get mine!
The law is clear. See the case quotes below:
Only those comments that pose a “serious and imminent threat” of interference with the fair administration of justice can be constitutionally proscribed”
We can note that lawyers involved in investigations or trials often are in a position to act as a check on government by exposing abuses or urging action. It is not sufficient to argue that such comment can always be made later since immediate action might be necessary and it is only when the litigation is pending and current news that the public’s attention can be commanded.
Again there is the importance of the time factor in terms of gaining the public’s attention. Ideally, we would want such views expressed in the abstract without reference to the particular case that is pending. Practically, it may not always be possible to differentiate the two. Still, we should recognize the importance of such criticism.
We do recognize the great benefits derived from allowing uninhibited comment by knowledgeable attorneys involved in civil litigation. This is the same type of recognition embodied in the First Amendment.
Chicago Council of Lawyers v. Bauer
http://openjurist.org/522/f2d/242
And yet the guardians and abusers continue to get away with the scheme of target, medicate, isolate and eliminate with a quick cremate to destroy evidence.
I am not to speak of this under the attorney code of silence. I can’t say that my trial at the the ARDC was a complete travesty of justice, a kangaroo court where transcripts were changed, a Judge had to “suddenly retire” right after, the subject of the litigation had no jursidction and continues to have no jurisdiction (Sykes–call the Sheriff’s department ask for a summons and complaint upon Mary Sykes, there is none), the ARDC 3 main witnesses have been continualy complained about in all major probate new blogs and their conduct decried, yet I am not to say anything. Ken Ditkowsky is not to say anything about how his trial was pretty much the same, with no proof of lies, these were manufactured in a decision by the powers that be to cover up what the ARDC does not want the public to know–that probate is a target, isolate, medicate, elimate and then a quick cremation business. We are not to say that the phrase “assets must be sold to help the disabled” is code for “judge, we want a lot of attorneys fees.” In Sykes and at my trial, the Tribunal did whatever it could, made rash decisions to ban witnesses and evidence–to cover up the fact that a $700,000 home was appraised in Jan. then sold in Mar. for $215k–and all the proceeds went to attorneys fees, or just about all. The attorneys were so greedy, they went after a family member’s money to pay an addition $107k+ in attorneys fees to Fischel in Kahn.
But what did they tell the judge at just about every hearing to ask to liquidate? The money was needed for Mary’s care. No it wasn’t. Most probate attorneys would rather stuff a disabled in a dirty, nasty inattentive nursing home with a staff to patient ratio of 1 to 10 rather than let a dime in attorneys fees escape them and it’s the honest truth.
A truth so dangerous, this IS the most dangerous blog in Illinois and the truth of the Sykes case is the most dangerous truth in Illinios because it directly exposes greed, corruption, lack of honest services, a string of felonies, as Ken says where there is no jurisdiction and Mary is in a place she never put in her advance directives. As in the Wyman case, it was all against her will.
So today, please take a stand for this poor woman and her beloved diabled brother in Iowa where some out of control, Abuse of Power Guardian has banned her from seeing her beloved brother–all without a court order.
I say we have to pray for us all.
And then some.
JoAnne
Finally, a webinar (complimentary) on bribery and corruption for lawyers! New York Law Journal
WITH A HUGE THANKS TO THE NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL FOR DOING THIS! I WILL BE SURE TO ATTEND AND ASK THEY POST THIS ON YOU TUBE!From: NYLJ <nylj@email.alm.com>
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:25 PM
Subject: Join Us for a Complimentary Bribery and Corruption CLE Webinar – March. 3
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
From Ken Ditkowsky–Time to take action and fight the good fight to save seniors and disableds from nursing home purgatory
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 27, 2015 1:39 PM
To: YJ Draiman , Eric Holder , Tim NASGA , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Matt Senator Kirk , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , BILL DITKOWSKY , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Ginny Johnson , Bev Cooper , FOX News Network LLC , Diane Nash , Cook County States Attorney , Scott Evans , Fiduciary Watch , “Y. ACLU” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Barbara Stone , Illinois ARDC , Glenda Martinez , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Sam Sugar , “tips@cbschicago.com” , RosANNa Miller , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Eric Blair , Alyece Russell , Candice Schwager
Subject: Fw: Join Us for a Complimentary Bribery and Corruption CLE Webinar – March. 3
From Eliot Bernstein – Sharp Practice by Lawyers defined
Here’s an interesting definition of the word “sharp practice”
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sharp+practice
I am posting this because it seems to fit the problems seen by many of you–opposing counsel that lies, threats, barely (if at all legal) tactics much of which is designed to churn legal bills and do little in the way of “best interests” of the disabled person or those that love and support her or him.
From Eliot Bernstein – Sharp Practice by Lawyers defined
Here’s an interesting definition of the word “sharp practice”
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sharp+practice
I am posting this because it seems to fit the problems seen by many of you–opposing counsel that lies, threats, barely (if at all legal) tactics much of which is designed to churn legal bills and do little in the way of “best interests” of the disabled person or those that love and support her or him.
From Ken Ditkowsky, how long with the cover ups hold up?
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 21, 2015 8:58 AM
To: JoAnne M Denison , Tim Lahrman
Cc: Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , BILL DITKOWSKY , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Janet Phelan , Ginny Johnson , “ABAJournal.com” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Bev Cooper , FOX News Network LLC
Subject: Re: Fw: Responding to your inquiry
From Eliot Bernstein–over 2,000+ torture pictures to be released of war detainees
http://www.inquisitr.com/1844013/over-2000-u-s-government-torture-photos-could-be-released-soon/
While the ACLU sues to ensure that our democracy is functioning the way it should, with complete transparency regarding the actions of the powers that be, apparently BOTH the Bush and the Obama administration have been playing hide the sausage with photos that might be even more disturbing that already released.
Why the CIA pretends that treaties against war crimes, and the Nuremberg trials do not exist is beyond me.
Even children in grammar school seem to know more about how torture is wrong and illegal than grownups with decades of experience in international law and degrees from Ivy League institutions.
Apparently the publication of these photos were held up with motion after motion filed by the government to delay, delay, delay. What the delays buy them is not understood because they are delaying the inevitable. And if the government is so heck bent on delaying the release of these videos then why weren’t they properly managing the CIA staff in the first place, and what provisions have they put in place to ensure this does not happen again.
Will the Obama administration release new policy changes with the photos to ensure there is no repeat of this embarrassing and volatile situation.
The government constantly claims release would inflame or incite violence, but I think they should have thought of that years ago when the war crimes were being committed. 2,000 photos are more than an “isolated incident” from one or two out of control employees.
JoAnne
From Ken Ditkowsky — Larkin believes that Guardianship is still in rem from the dark ages
to explain. When a proceeding is “in personnam” personal jurisdiction is obtained by service of a summons and complaint upon a person or corporation. An “in rem” proceeding (such as a foreclosure) can take place ask long as you have served the property by notice and the court attains jurisdiction over the property or “rem.” (for examply posting on an apartment for eviction or a home for foreclosure but only AFTER you have validly attempted to serve the owners and after a diligent search cannot find them.
In Mary’s case, the court knew where she was, but never served her. So the only notice was by a court order handed out to a few people.
Of course, this meets none of the standards for either in personnam or in rem jurisdiction, but that does not stop the court appointed/connected miscreants from taking over Mary’s life, property, civil and human rights and sending her to a remote location (Naperville) with a daughter when her last POA said she wanted to live in her home until she died and have both daughters care for her there.
But the property was sold, and at my ARDC trials, one of the main cover ups was to deny that some $160k in attys fees to Peter Schmeidel and Fischel and Kahn–or the bulk of the estate would go to attorneys fees. The ABA Journal covered this up by pulling comments on their blog from family members who related the lack of service of summons and complaint upon Mary and notice to Mary’s family, which is required to take in personnam jurisdiction over her. The ARDC covered this up by banning most of my witnesses (experts and fact witnesses) but presenting Judge Stuart, who lied on the stand and then “suddenly retired” soon afterward, Peter Schmeidel who is covering up telling the court all of Mary’s assets have to be liquidated “for her care”, but the vast majority have already gone to attorneys fees ($700k home appraised in January sold for $220k in Mar, then they grabbed daughter Gloria’s assets of some $200k falsely claiming they belonged to Mary, and $60k from the home sale went to attorney’s fees and over $100k from Gloria’s funds went to attorneys. You figure. The cover up continues with the ARDC having witnesses lie, transcripts changed, audio tapes documenting the changes supressed–it’s all fraud on the court.
Best thing about fraud on the court? It has NO LIMITATIONS PERIOD. That’s right, like jurisdiction, it’s a scab over a huge festering boil waiting to be picked — any time, any day.
The hue and cry from probate victims will not stop as long as we have a free and open and democratic society and open internet. They are banding together and publishing popular blogs ( this blog, Probate Sharks, NASGA, John Wyman’s, Candice Schwagers, Stop Guardian Abuse and others)
Everyday, the ARDC flings more and more paper at me and I don’t care. All I think of is the suffering and horrors these probate victims and the families have gone thru and will go thru unless and until all this nonsense in the courtrooms stop.
In the ARDC decision, the tribunal insulting stated “the Respondent does not know about basic concepts of law…..” Sorry I have to disagree with the Tribunal, but their “basic concepts” of lies, coverups, banning crucial witnesses, treating the Sykes family members like dirt–I don’t need their “basic elements” in my craw. The Tribunal can keep that for themselves.
I know what a summons and complaint is and notice to all next of kin. I know the alleged disabled respondent must receive a “notice of rights” in large bold type to take jurisdiction. It’s the Tribunal that does not know basic concepts of due process and free speech that a 6th grade student must know on her or his US civil rights exam to pass to the next grade.
I don’t see any of the tribunal offering to take on all my cases for pro bono, but I will ask them, and Mr. Sanders can pull his money out of his pocket to sponsor lawyers to do the same thing I do for free or low cost each and every day to protect the human rights, civil rights and elderly of our seniors. This is karma they have to make up.
Mr. Splitt just asked for an extension of time for his brief to the review board. He said the “record is too big” to get his brief done. I wonder when he will finally realized that he is prosecuting an innocent, honest attorney and all this is bad karma for him, and he should just refuse to write the brief and quit. While everyone deserves representation, what the ARDC wants him to write is a huge pack of lies and a cover up. When the fraud on the court is finally heard by an open and honest legal forum, hasta lasanga, don’t get it on ya.
Respectfully Mr. Splitt, no extension of time will allow you to search that entire record for some reason to discipline me. Keep on going, but you won’t find it. And if you do what the ARDC asks of you to convict a wholly innocent attorney, like Ken Ditkowsky and Mr. Amu, maybe it’s time to just walk off the job. If your heart is in the right place, the angels will protect you.
Each and every day, I work for low cost or free and do not turn people away. I help them against the liars and the cheats and the thugs hanging in the court room hallways. It’s not always easily and I have my critics (the ARDC talking about all the good I do in a huge paragraph, but it ends with “all of that is misplaced.”) No, Mr. Larking, goodness and kindness and helping others is NEVER misplaced. I’d rather have a ton of that than the lies propagated during my trial, and the exclusion of crucial witness, the lying and the cover ups
JoAnne
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 14, 2015 7:36 AM
To: Janet Phelan
Subject: The In Rem guardianship/ or the application of the Dred Scott Decision to Seniors and the Disabled in Illinois and some other miscreant States.
Dr. Reinstein takes massive kickbacks for risky drugs..psychotropic drugs!
Today, from the Chicago Tribune
$600k in kickbacks, a prolific prescriber, he once prescribed 490 prescriptions in 5 days!
And we wonder why the Tribunals at the ARDC and Jerome Larkin at the ARDC are engaged in a massive coverup.
They either knew or should have known of the kickbacks–just like Gov. Ryan went down for.
No one ever proved that Gov. Ryan took a kickback from any $200 no test CDL, but he was convicted and sent to prison for many years nonetheless.
Jerome Larkin has received dozens and dozens of client complaints of cottage industry schemes in probate, and ignores them all, sending out nonsensical letter in Sykes, Gore, Tyler, etc. He and his staff do not file Ethics Reports under the mandatory reporting act of 2009. If you complain to the Ill. Supreme Court, they send you to Atty Zimmerman, who I am told was placed there to do nothing. He is a do nothing kind of guy.
Let’s applaud the feds for going after Dr. Reinstein.
Let’s set up a Bastille day for all the elders drugged against their will, forced to live in nursing homes, deprived any independent third party supervisor by court order (Frake), feeding tube in one end laced with drugs because the patient eats to slowly and a diaper on the other and forced to stay in bed or a wheel chair with alarms.
Disgusting, worse the the most horrid state run Chinese orphanages with dying rooms (youtube.com)
joanne
In scary shades of ARDC tribunals who withhold audio when allegations of altered transcripts arise….
this judge is publically lambasted for doing so.
Take a look at this article:
http://www.wfxg.com/story/28088174/judge-denies-production-of-court-hearing-audio-recordings
The question is, why is the news so negative on him, when my Tribunal thought it had the right to refuse my motion to turn over tapes, and then just told me to submit my own notes, then when I did, they ignored them.
Like the judge in this article, Jerome Larkin has had many past accusations of covering up fraud, ignoring valid client complaint results in severe financial exploitation (in the millions–Sykes, Gore, Tyler, etc.) and also severe injury to disabled persons via the court appointed guardians and attorneys (Sykes being severely ill, Carol Wyman–attempted murder, read the book, Alice Gore isolated and then 29 gold teeth pulled, a feeding tube implanted because she ate to slow and she was infused with psychotropic meds and starved/dehydrated to death, etc. We now have a list in Illinois.
How is it Gov. Ryan’s brand of corruption (selling CDL’s for $200) results in his imprisonment for years when 5 young children burn up to death, but Larkin’s cover up and refusal to investigate the near murder of Carol Wyman in one of Illinois’ worst nursing homes and then the starvation/dehdration and drugging continues? (Frake).
Which reminds me, I just got an order today in response to my allegations of severe abuse (a once vibrant man is reduced quickly to a wheel chair, a mysterious fall after entering the nursing home is unattended to, then he is drugged to the point his eyes are dilated in daylight, he can’t lift his head up, he says he wants to die–the court covers all this up by saying they will simply limit any visitors (ie, witnesses to illegal psychotropic drugging, etc.) (Frake). See below. Carl Kettler of Bright Star — a professional nursing firm that does not believe in abuse, is now banned from coming near Mr. Frake. Carl Kettler was to be used as a witness. Imagine he is banned by Judge Quinn?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwVC1FX3l0dVdNOGJhS3dBdURTdkdjRGlSTDh3/view?usp=sharing
JoAnne
Great article on Probate Exception — why is there a probate exception and not a contract exception, partnership exception, etc
So Barbara Stone and I were wondering, what is this “probate exception” that keeps normally tough and anti corruption Federal Courts from providing a second look at what is going on in Probate Court that sometimes can only be described as utterly down the rabbit hole.
Where does this come from? How does “probate exception” scare even the toughest of judges when the public is clamoring for a RICO presumption in probate, the Federal Court judges cower and dump anything that mentions probate as a regular course of business.
I mean, by that measure, they should dump all personal property disputes that liquidate and divide assest, maybe there should be a business partnership exception (probate is much like winding down a business, assets are sold and liquidated and disputes between the partners as to valuation and ethics in transactions are carefully scrutinized by Federal Court judges all the time when there is diversity, etc.) I just don’t see the dichotomy why the Federal Courts won’t step in when the State Probate Courts are ablaze with fraud, problems and issues in some cases with a lot of money. If the Federal Courts can decide multi million dollar cases, tens of millions of dollars of cases, why do they (fallaciously) claim they “don’t do probate” they don’t “have the expertise” (ie, it’s too hard for them to think about probate), when you know all the judges are mostly brilliant, went to ivy league law schools, and/or they have a bevy of brilliant law clerks. What gives?
Here is a good article from Tim Lahrman on what this animal is, when did it evolve and what are the various standards from state to state.
Read and enjoy.
So is this a probate exception or just a probate excuse from accusations of abuse of civil and human rights? Why aren’t the federal courts stepping in when the state courts do nothing to protect civil and human rights.? Why do the federal courts now only want large corporate disputes and have forgotten the real reason they exist–for the citizens and not the mega corporations of the US.
joanne
From Tim Lahrman–a man on the inside of the diability game
From the LA Times, if the police arrest you, first thing to ditch is the cell phone?
From Eliot Bernstein, this article explains how some protestors, who engage in peaceful protest, work to protect citizen’s rights, are first advising to ditch cell phones when arrested.
Technically, an arrest is anytime the police start talking to you and you believe you must respond and cannot walk away. You should always ask the officer, “may I leave now?” If the answer is “no” at anytime, you’re under arrest. And it’s not that I don’t love talking to strange and new police officers, but you have to be sure to talk about the weather, tell jokes, ask if you can help them with anything, ask if they’d like a free knitting or crocheting lesson, but general talk about crimes and criminality is off limits. I just tell them I’m not a PD or prosecutor, so I don’t know anything about X so I can’t answer any questions, but if they send me interrogatories in written form, I’d be glad to answer them in 30 days.
In any case, keep a lock on your cell phone. Do NOT leave it unattended. DO use Google cell phone wiper if it gets out of hands which enables you to wipe your cell phone remotely. DO fill your cellphone with stupid stuff like pet videos and junk no one is interested in. I like to fill my computer files and cell phone with knitting and crocheting patterns and videos, so that would keep them busy learning the strange instructions like 3tr, 2dc, repeat * to *, use Tunisian hook, pm, etc.. I”m sure they’re think it a great secret code to take hours to unravel.
Regardless, here;s the article and thanks, Eliot:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-warrantless-smartphone-searches-20150211-story.html
I do, however, think the key to getting better behavior out of our police, which means better behavior from citizens on the street, because police should be the example, is to require them to either go to the law library for 2 hours each week or do 2 hours of online study of caselaw and statutory laws. It would solve a lot of the problems we are seeing now with police over reaching, abusing authority and then the city, county, states or feds pay for it.
From Mr. Lanre Amu–how did this happen in the US?
This is not North Korea, this is not the mideast or Egypt with severely dwindling human and civil rights! In Iran they take away a woman lawyer’s children when she advocates for equal rights!
In the US, Mr. Amu was found guilty of practicing law while black!
’Lanre O. Amu
The Peoples ’ Lawyer
Agbẹjọ́rò
B.C.E. (UMn,’84), M.S.C.E. (UMn ’86), M.B.A.(UIC,’89), J.D.(’95)
Lawyer Amu is Innocent, Reinstate His Law License Now!
A Call for an Independent Investigation of Judicial Corruption!
Watch Youtube: Attorney Amu
This is a Peaceful Petition to Reinstate Lawyer Amu’s Law License Now; to Investigate Corruption in the Judiciary, the Entire Court System, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC); and to Reform Our Court System for the Betterment of Our Lives. Given the Impact These Institutions Have on the Lives of Everyone in Our Society, We the People Must No Longer Consent to be Held Hostage by the Lawless any Longer. The People Must Organize to Take Action to Eradicate Corruption in these Institutions. Unless We are Hypocrites, Our Consciences Must Alert Us that Neo-slavery, Racism, and/or Institutionalized Oppression are Violations of Human Rights, Barbaric, and Have No Place in America the Land of the Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants!
Judicial Corruption is a Far More Serious Crime by these Elites than an Individual’s Armed Robbery, Rape, and/or Murder, Because a Lot More People are Victims from Just One Single Corrupt Judge! To Eradicate Judicial Corruption, Judges Must be Held to Not Just the Letter, But Also the Spirit, of the Solemn Oath of Office they Took When They Assumed the Position of Judges. Judges Must also be Objectively Held to High Moral, Ethical, and Legal Standards in their Stewardships. Judges Must Have Integrity, be Honest, Accountable, and Transparent in their Decision Making and Dealings.
Have You Ever Wondered Why Our Court System is Often so Intimidating, Complicated With Legalese, Motions, Codes, Rules, Statutes, Acts, Ordinances, Case Law upon Case Law, Long-Winded, and/or Financially Beyond the Reach of the Average Joe Blow Litigant? Answer: If Our Court System is More Straight Forward and Transparent to the Average Joe Blow, there Will be Less Need for Lawyers, there will be less Expense, Less Monies Floating Around, Joe Blow Can Easily Decode Legalese, Understand Fully What is Happening, Spot and Resist Corruption! Don’t Be Fooled! Our Court System Can be Reformed to Root Out Corruption, Cut to the Chase, With Less Expense, and in Less Time! But Does the Will Exist to Implement Such Reforms? Ask your Lawmakers!
In 16 Years of Legal Practice, in Which I Had the Honor of Serving Our Peoples of All
Races, and from all Walks of Life, Concerning their Affairs in Our Courts, I have Come
A Call for an Independent Investigation of Judicial Corruption!
Page 2 of 2
Across Many Judges with Integrity Who are Capable of Reforming Our Court System if Given the Opportunity. But Sadly, I Have Also Come Across Many Corrupt Judges and
Justices Who Will Rather Perpetuate the System as it is, and Persecute Anyone Who Dares to Expose How Bad the Court System Really is! Under Our Current System, Justices Sit in Judgment of Lawyers, Deciding Who Can or Cannot Practice Law. But Who Judges the Judges When they are Corrupt? Right Now, No One! As Such, There is Virtually No Risk or Cost to Being a Corrupt Judge. But the Financial and Social
Benefits of Being a Corrupt Judge are Real! Unprincipled Human Beings Regardless of Title or Position Will Do that Which is Beneficial to Him or Her as Long as the Risks or Costs Do not Outweigh the Benefit! Reform is Needed Such that the Risks or Costs of Judicial Corruption NOW Outweigh the Benefits! That is the Key to Deterrence!
Unfortunately, Lawyers Like Myself Who “Naively” File Complaints Against Corrupt Judges Thinking they are Working to Improve Our Legal System Receive the Shock of their Lives! They are Defamed, Ostracized, Harassed, Suspended and/or Disbarred! By Making a Public Example of Us “Naive” Lawyers, these Justices Impose a Conspiracy of Silence on the Entire Bar! Many People and Entities, Including Practicing Lawyers, are Afraid to Publicly Talk About Judicial Corruption Out Fear for Their Livelihood and/or Other Consequences Should They End Up Before The Judges or Justices! These Judges and Justices Close Ranks and Live in Denial of the Obvious. Who Will Alert Our Emperors that they Have No Clothes? Who Will Bell the Cat?
Without Integrity, Honesty, Transparency, and Accountability in Our Courts, Everyone in Our Society is at Risk of Being a Victim! Judicial Corruption Endangers Savings, Property, Liberty, and Even Life Itself. No One is Safe in a Corrupt Legal System! Today, John Q. Public is the Victim of Judicial Corruption, tomorrow it Could be You! The Next Time you see a Homeless Person on the Street, Think Twice Before You Criticize and/or Look Down on that Person. You May be Looking at a Victim of Failings in Our Court System! On the other hand, the Judge You See in Expensive Suit or Black Robe, Whom Everyone Including deputy sheriff is Rising up For, May Well be an Imposter who Deserves to be Unmasked, and Apprehended, if not in US Courts Perhaps at the International Court of Justice at the Hague! These are Some of the Paradoxes, Inconsistencies, and Contradictions of Our Society While Our Elected Leaders Preach so Called American Style Democracy, Human Rights, and Justice Abroad! Why Preach What is not Practiced in Our Society Abroad? Does Charity Not Begin at Home?
Some Examples of the Effects of Judicial Corruption:
* Imagine Being Sued for All you have in a Corrupt Legal System!
* Illegally Fired Employee Denied Justice in a Corrupt Legal System!
*Pension and Disability Payments Can be Arbitrarily Denied in a Corrupt Legal System!
* Injured Persons Denied Justice in a Corrupt Legal System!
* Elderly can be Wiped out in Guardianship in a Corrupt Legal System!
* Patient Injured by a Hospital May Have no Recourse in a Corrupt Legal System!
ACTION! : Copy, Publish, and Help Spread this Paper Widely to Everyone! Spread the Word! By ‘Lanre O. Amu, the Peoples’ Lawyer,773-728-8249 http://www.LanreAmu.com
‘Lanre O. Amu
4550 North Clarendon Avenue, Unit 1404 South
Chicago, Illinois 60640
773-728-8249
Email: loamu@aol.com
Elderly Man beaten at NW memorial Hospital by security guardss – suit recently filed
Very scary. An elderly man eaten in the cafeteria was drug into the basement of the hospital and beaten, after he was told to leave the hospital.
One of the problems with security guards is they often have no background checks done, they have little or no training and are not certified in their jobs to prevent issues before they arise.
If anyone knows more details, please contact me.
JoAnne
From the Frake Estate–why is he being drugged with a cocktail of 4 psychotropic meds
All without meeting the standards of In Re Tiffany, and all over objections of the family members, and the Judge, Carolyn Quinn, just hands back reports of abuse to the abuser!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwTWtIZ3VjWHhnSGc/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwSV9LOExtb1RpZXM/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwYWRhQzFRSDFFckk/view?usp=sharing
What this means is YOU can be stripped of your paid up home, placed in Sunrise Nursing Home in Park Ridge, be given these drugs–if your “crime” is being a pain in the butt:
The ward has no known drug allergies [NKDA] and takes the following medications:
Effexor (antidepressant); Lithium Carbonate (mood stabilizer); Donepezil (dementia); Risperdal (mood stabilizer); Tegretal (mood stabilizer); Metoprolo! (blood pressure); Simvastatin (cholesterol); Ducosate (stool softener) and Vultaran Cream (facial
erythema).
(just for everyone’s edification, Effexor, Lithium, Risperdal and Tegretal are all basically horse tranquilizers. They are derived from Thorazine, a horse tranquilizer developed in the 1930’s. )
In prior weeks this blog reported excessive drooling and a drool bib. The court appointed attorneys replied, “drooling is just saliva pooling in the mouth.” Outrageous.
At first, I was told Mr. Frake received no psychotropic drugs. Then I pushed for more information, drugs and doctors. Then I found out Mr. Frake was given “some but not enough to alter his personality.” Preposterous. Then on Thursday I was outraged to find in the annual report, the above cocktail of strong psychotropic meds. I stayed up all night ran to court early Friday morning to deliver the report to Judge CQ, but she appeared more concerned that the report did not have the proper 2 business day’s notice and she scowled at it as the concerns of the family meant nothing, absolutely nothing and she was tired of having to read these reports. Sigh. Glad I stayed up for that one. So much tiresome work to produce a quality cover up.
Son Gary reported over and over how his father’s head hung quite low and his father could not raise it upon request, Gary also reported Father Frake’s nearly inaudible speech, his wish to die, the atrophy of muscles in his legs–all denied by everyone else in the court room, but Gary has witnesses. Father Frake went from a stong, tough, assertive (sometime abusive) man who spoke his mind (not always pleasant), to someone that sits in a wheelchair all day long, head drooping, no high cognitive abilities, saying things he never said before–all on a strong cocktail of psychotropic drugs!
Of course, the court’s vermin blame dementia, but how would anyone know with that cocktail of strong psychotropic drugs/sedatives.
At least In re Tiffany had a diagnosis of mental illness. Father Frake has no diagnosis, at least not in his report.
According to Fla statutes, they declared:
28)(a) “Restraint” means a physical device, method, or drug used to control behavior. A physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the individual’s body so that he or she cannot easily remove the restraint and which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one’s body.
(b) A drug used as a restraint is a medication used to control the person’s behavior or to restrict his or her freedom of movement and is not part of the standard treatment regimen of a person with a diagnosed mental illness who is a client of the department.
Here, Mr. Frake was never even diagnosed with a mental illness to anyone’s knowledge. He was just a pain in the butt, so Sunrise and their docs shot him up until he shut up and drooled.
I tried to talk to atty JF, who is representing P & B, and he told me he didn’t want to talk about it. I also tried to talk to him about how the bank–Guardian of the Estate got $69k for managing the Trust of Father Frake for a year–collecting social security checks and a few rents, paying a few bills, but got no comment on that either. Not a good topic I suppose.
Mr. Alan Frake’s demeanor in the past was not one of passivity. He could be hostile, rude, obnoxious and prone to outbursts. So what does Sunrise/the court do? Drug him until he is stripped of his personality.
The Ward’s mental condition is: Mr. Frake presents a calmer demeanor as compared to what he was demonstrating in 2012 and 2013. His anger, hostility andaggressive behaviors are absent. He no longer has explosive outbursts, and he does not make verbal or gestural threats. His confusion and loss of short-term memory ismore pronounced and in keeping with a patient who presents with a progressive cognitive loss. The ward does not speak in terms of [still] “running his business, getting
quotes or doing jobs”. However, he always asks his visitors “how’s business or how’s your business going”? This part of Mr. Frake, business, lies at his core and will remain with him for as long as he is able to verbalize. (From Annual Report on Ward)
This court’s vermin de jour connected therein, have a long history of ignoring the civil rights and liberties of any person, esp. as illuminated in In re Tiffany, and they head any disobedient elder right to the drug bottle, wheel chair and nursing home.
I have not heard the case In re Tiffany mention anytime in Probate court, so it is a civil rights case keeping the law in pristine condition because it is never used.
From a disabled woman in Mass.–stripped of her new born days after birth!
From a harrowing plight–
BOSTON (AP) — She was 19, a brand-new mother with a developmental disability. Two days after giving birth to her daughter, the state took the infant away and placed her in foster care.
Massachusetts child welfare officials contend the young woman couldn’t properly care for a newborn and insist they acted in the child’s best interests. But the federal government disagrees: It says the state violated her civil rights by discriminating against her because of her disability.
In a new report, the Justice Department and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services say the state Department of Children and Families — which has moved to terminate the mother’s parental rights — needs to compensate her and give her a chance to prove she can care for her daughter, or it could face a federal lawsuit.
Finally, someone admits that these types of state actions are illegal, discriminatory and a horror show. Let’s pray for this mother and child, that they soon be reunited.
from the article
http://news.yahoo.com/feds-state-wrongly-took-moms-child-2-days-154328655.html
read the whole story
From Ken Ditkowsky–for black history month, Mr. Amu was practicing law while being black!
From C-Span, the Congressional Hearings on Elder Financial Abuse
A good link to see what the Federal Government intends to do about all of these problems:
http://www.c-span.org/video/?324176-1/hearing-financial-exploitation-seniors
While the chair from Maine talks mainly (pun intended?) about family members taking finanacial advantage of elders, it is our experience that combined with these issues are then the probate courts and guardianships take advantage of that senior in their target-isolate-medicate-drain and eliminate programs now bustling in the nation’s probate courts and for which victims are becoming mightly vociferous in their objections to having a feeding tube implanted at one end, a diaper at the other and then the nursing home does little to nothing for $5k, $10k and sometimes even $15k per year.
If that isn’t severe abuse, torture and financial exploitation, I don’t know what else is. Atty Helen Stone’s case is a classic example of that. Brother takes $625k and she reports it, and a g-ship is opened. Two miscreants are appointed that drain $1.4 million in 20 months. Mrs. Helen Stone now has a feeding tube at one end and a diaper at the other. While paying for a nursing home, she is assigned aides to ensure the case is never documented, that the family is isolated from her, and the feeding tube is laced with a deadly combination of psychotropic drugs never dispensed in accord with Florida law which declares in Section 364 that chemical restraints, incluidng holding a person down to shoot them up with psychotropic drugs is never a part of any approved therapy or treatment for a mental disease or defect–and in Mrs. Helen Stone’s case, she never even had a mental disease or defect. She should have a guardianship limited to the recovery for financial exploitation and nothing else.
So, we will keep on writing to these Senators and keep on documenting these cases.
Thanks
JoAnne
CALL FOR DECLARATIONS TO SCOI opposing the ARDC’s Petition for JMD’s Interrim Suspension
For those of you that are familiar with the Petition for my suspension under Sup. Ct. Rule 774 based upon the ARDC’s allegations that I and this blog is a danger to the public and to my clients because this blog contains numerous false and misleading statements or false statements made with “disregard for the truth”, now is your chance to tell the ARDC and the Supreme Court of Illinois that is a preposterous allegation.
Please print out and sign the below declaration if you disagree. EVEN IF YOU AGREE WITH THEM, AS LONG AS YOU PROVIDE SOME REASONABLE BASIS FOR YOUR DECLARATION, I WILL SUBMIT.
This blog is honest, accurate and truthful. We do not hide the truth. We believe in human rights, civil rights and liberties, and most of all, free speech.
Go ahead and let me know your thoughts and I will send them along.
thanks
joanne
see below, change as YOU desire. don’t let the ARDC or the Supreme Court of Illinois let YOU think. Don’t let them make their speech your speech. You say what you want, and what you know. You have YOUR truth, now speak YOUR truth. Change as you want and I will send it to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
In Re:
JOANNE MARIE DENISON
Attorney-Respondent
Reg. No. 6192441
Commission No. 2013 PR 0001
DECLARATION TO ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT
The undersigned doth deposes and saith:
1. My name is _________________________ and my address is ____________________________________________________________________, and this is in regard to the ARDC’s current mission to take away the law license of Attorney Joanne Denison (“Ms. Denison”) for merely running a blog that tells the truth about the fraud on the court and the lack of respect for the US and State Constitutions and the Illinois Probate Act in and without the Illinois Probate System.
2. ______ I am very familiar with Ms. Denison’s blog and have read about ____ posts on it.
3. _______ I have read the complaint in Ms. Denison’s case and am familiar with it. I understand that the ARDC desires to take away Ms. Denison’s law license because she blogs about fraud and corruption in Probate and other cases. I believe it is wrong to go after someone who exposes only the truth. I have read the blog and Ms. Denison’s blog is extremely helpful to Probate Victims and their families. I am very familiar with her work, and she does in fact tell the truth.
4.________ I have read the ARDC’s petition for an Immediate Suspension of Ms. Denison’s Law License and I know that she helps many, many people without any payment demands, and many cases she takes are pro bono with no expectation of payment. No other attorney admitted to the bar in Illinois does that. Without her assistance, dozens of indigent and lower middle class families would have no help and no hope in these horrific guardianship cases. She helps everyone that comes to her as best she can.
5. ________ I have been helped by and rely upon Ms. Denison on a pro bono basis or for what I can pay, which is only a small portion of the true legal bill. Without her, her I would not have any representation. Prior to using Ms. Denison, I had sought help from approx ____ number attorneys and paid $_______________–all to no avail in my case.
6._______ I know the Sykes family well or Gloria Sykes and what Ms. Denison says about the Sykes family is true and accurate.
7._______ I have read the Petition for Immediate Suspension of Ms. Denison’s law license and I strongly disagree with it. This document falsely states that Ms. Denison is a danger to the public and to her clients and that she makes false statements against judges and judicial officials, none of that is true.
8.________ The immediate suspension of Ms. Denison would leave dozens and dozens of clients without help or representation, including myself.
Her suspension must not happen. She is not a danger to anyone other than those that want to cover up the truth.
9. Other comments:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
10. I give Ms. Denison permission to post my comments and declaration but not the ARDC.
Further declarant saith not.
I hereby declare that the above statements are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge; if called to testify, I would testify as to the same.
Respectfully submitted;
_____________________________________
Name printed: ________________________________
Dated __________________, 2015

















