Since it’s inception, this blog has been about cleaning up the courts, ensuring justice, eliminating tie ins and tie ups, looking for constitutional violations (Sykes, Gore, Bedin, Wyman, Drabik), and thanks to Gloria’s great research, we can see how someone else does it–read on.
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jan 3, 2014 9:54 PM
To: GLORIA Jean SYKES , Tim Lahrman NASGA , “firstname.lastname@example.org”
Cc: Eric Holder , Cook County States Attorney , “email@example.com” , “ACLU@ACLU.ORG” , NASGA , probate sharks , JoAnne Denison , Cook Sheriff , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — honest atty unfairly persecuted by ARDC” , SUNTIMES , Chicago Tribune , “email@example.com” , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky
Subject: Re: the 1969 scandal of the courts
What has happened in the Mary Sykes case is despicable, wrong and contrary to every principle of jurisprudence. As Attorneys Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel are involved and the Administrator of the ARDC and his staff have totally ignored the obvious theft of Mary Sykes assets, her deprivation of her liberty, and other actions that would be criminal if committed by anyone other than one of the ‘favored few’ Every attorney and every citizen pursuant to law and statute is required to report the actions of the aforesaid persons to law enforcement. See 18 USCA 4. The aiding and abetting of the actions is a clear violation of 18 USCA 171.
Gloria – your note has now been forwarded to law enforcement with a copy to the Mr. J. Larkin’s ARDC. By law it is the duty of Mr. Larkin the ARDC to do an Honest, Intelligent, Complete and Comprehensive investigation of the attorneys involved in the ‘elder cleansing of Mary Sykes and others similarly situated rather than make excuses for the abuse and financial exploitation. I and many other citizens have requested that the law be enforced to protect the public rather than the miscreants. I’ve spread the Farenga smoking gun letter around to everyone and the outrage is so loud that even the church mice are not disturbed by the hue and cry!
Of course no was disturbed for ten years by Madoff, and Adolph Hitler and his National Socialists were lauded for their prelude to World War 2. While the miscreants were black suits rather than ‘brown shirts’ their misconduct is still terrible and I sincerely hope that your friends in the press would display a little courage and take on the task of upholding the liberties that are granted to them by the First Amendment. Those of us in the fight for Senior citizen liberty recognize that the miscreants have much more appeal. We are not going to reward the political types with consistent votes, compensation in the form of campaign contributions etc, nor are we dependable echos of slogans or talking points! Indeed, we are the flotsam that the political classes have to tolerate!
Nevertheless the Illinois legislature sought to protect us by announcing its public policy in 735 ILCS 110/5 and providing us with the protection of 320 ILCS 20/4, Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 and dictates to law enforcement. The Congress provided us with 42 USCA 1983 (and 1988), 18 USCA 4, 18 USCA 171, 18 USCA 1341, 47 USCA 230 etc. Yes, I realize that all the protections are being currently ignored and Mr. Larkin is so sure of his clout he is prosecuting me in clear conflict with not only the aforesaid statutes but the Rule of Law as set forth by the United States Supreme Court. Indeed, sans clout Mr. Larkin would be before a Federal Magistrate *****, instead of ignoring the many citizen complaints that are brought before him in regard to the miscreant lawyers who he chooses to ‘aid and abet!’
Mr. S was labeled a ‘nut’ but he kept on his gadfly mission. Persistence is the key to obtaining justice for senior citizens such as your mother. Remember that laws have been broken. Mr. Larkin might think it unethical to complaint about your and your mother’s safety deposit box being broken into and a million dollars in gold coins (plus) being removed and not inventoried. Mr. Stern may not think it relevant to inform the court that CT went from alleged insolvency to sporting value jewelry, lavish social events, expensive remodeling on her home ****. Indeed, the ‘rags to riches’ demonstrations observed by Stern, Schmiedel, Farenga and certain of the staff of the IARDC might be routine and irrelevant in their eyes, but, at some point in time at the very least the taxman will seek the ‘government’s share’ of the booty! 18 USCA 171 looms!
Let me assure you, the special agents of the IRS, and the FBI are not blind to the fact that you and others have written dozens of letters to Mr. Larkin, the Sheriff, the States Attorney et al and the only actions taken by Mr. Larkin was to wrongfully accuse me of being a liar, attempt to silence Ms. Denison’s blog (47 USCA 230) etc. How (for example) is he going to explain why the hundreds of thousands of dollars of ‘dear’ State of Illinois money was spent on denying Ms. Denison and me of our First Amendment Rights and not a dime spent investigating the citizen complaints against Stern, Farenga, Solo et al ! Why is Larkin and the IARDC not interested in even joining for calling for an Honest, complete and comprehensive investigation of the Mary Sykes and related cases? How can he sleep at night knowing that he did nothing and Alice Gore lies in her grave toothless after her teeth were mined for their gold!!!!!
Gloria – keep writing! Get out your documentary and book! Justice is just around the corner!
On Friday, January 3, 2014 8:09 PM, GLORIA Jean SYKES <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
People v. Issacs
Once upon a time there was a Committee To Clean Up The Courts headed by a Sherman Skolnick, who in 1969 petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court for leave for amici curiae and “request that this Court investigate the decision in the above case“.
The Illinois Supreme Court denied leave but on it’s own, entered an order and appointed a commission to investigate the decision.
So I‘m thinking who we can get, or do I, ask the Illinois Supreme Court for Leave to investigate the order appointing Carolyn Toerpe guardian, as well as all orders prior and subsequent? The argument was “Public interest requires such an investigation”.
“A court has inherent power to investigate whether its judgments, orders, and decrees are tainted by fraud upon the court, and obtained by such fraud upon the court, and for that purpose may bring before it, by appropriate means, all those who may be affected by the outcome of the investigation.” Universal Oil Prod.Co. vs. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 580, 66 S.Ct.1176, 1179
Similar, there has been grave amounts of fraud on the Probate court (as well as the FED Court) and even more sad, on the Appellate Court.
A Commission was appointed and in the end, the Judge took an early retirement and left the bench.
These are interesting reads and I think clever action that somehow we should also take, I‘m just not certain how.