Monthly Archives: June 2015

From Ken Ditkowsky–make the miscreants pay the taxes that are due.

Posted on by
1

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 28, 2015 12:52 PM
To: Douglas Kinan , “Kirk@kirk.senate.gov” , Matt Senator Kirk , Edward Carter , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , Chicago Tribune
Subject: Why are the elder cleansers not paying their income taxes on their ill gotten gains? We would all like to know.

Tax Consequences of Elder Cleansing:
1.        Unreported Inventory.
One of the most common consequences of the isolation, and financial exploitation is the taking of assets (such as occurred in the Mary Sykes case -09 P 4585) and not inventorying them.   This theft is a benefit to the miscreant guardian as well as all who join in the Conspiracy.    In the Mary Sykes case we are dealing with nearly a million dollars in gold coins.    We are also dealing with “cash” and other valuables.   It is estimated that the entire estate had a value of over 2 million dollars.
When the fiduciary (and his co-conspirators) take possession directly or indirectly a taxable event occurs and each has joint and several liability for the entire value of the asset that is not inventoried and which ultimately finds its way out of the estate.   This is ordinary income.  It can be allocated to each and all of the following miscreants:  Judges X and Y, Schmeidel, Farenga, Stern and the ARDC that covered up by wrongfully prosecuting attorneys blowing the whistle on the abuse and fraud:  Jerome Larkin, head of the ARDC, Sharon Opryszek, Melissa Smart, Leah Black Guiterrez, Stephen Split and others.  Those with a finger in the pie, and those that cover up the pie, are all jointly and severally liable until the tax fraud debit is paid.
2.       Side ventures
The assets of the estate being ravaged has various assets in it that slip through the cracks after being inventoried.    In the Sykes it was quite difficult to make her home disappear.    So the guardians went into Court claiming that they needed money and the need to sell the house.    In the Sykes case the house had a value in excess of $700,000 – according to an appraisal done previously. [1]     The sale of the dwelling was for approx. $200,000.00.       This sale was highly questionable even though approved by the Court.
It is expected (and will occur in Sykes) that the property will be sold and through a series of mesne sales that full value will be obtained for the miscreants (co-conspirators).    The first purchaser will sell the property to another nominee purchaser.    This will be followed by another sale and finally a sale to the ultimate purchaser.     The final sale will be claimed as a capital gain –
As this side venture was a taxable event on day one, the entire transaction when it occurred is ordinary income.   Thus, the Sykes miscreants must pay when the sale occurred ordinary income taxes against the correct value of $1 million.    They are not entitled to capital gains – no matter how they structure the sale.
3.       Collateral pickups.
Being a guardian has with it opportunities.     They include kickbacks for playing the Ward in a nursing home, hospice facility.     In addition, employment of certain attorneys means referral fees etc.        All these referral fees are taxable income.      In the case of nursing homes as an example, the remuneration may come in the form of the income from nursing beds, an interest in the partnership controlling the facility, or the opportunity to engage in other and similar exploitations of the elderly.     These collaterals are ordinary income and the joint and several liability attaches to all of the conspirators.    Thus, it is respectfully suggested under reporting of the income tax liability may start the Statute of Limitations in operation as to the miscreant who reports the “kickback” but not as to the co-conspirators who did not report the benefit(gain).    Any tax paid however offsets the liability of the other co-conspirators to the extent of the payment
The Gore case a certain Guardian ad Litem was provided an opportunity to be the “heir” of an elderly person.    She took advantage of it and filed in the Florida Courts her claim.     The AG of Florida objected to the claim, however, he settled for ½ of the value of the payout.    That left a million dollars as an inheritance.     This inheritance was not an inheritance – it was a theft and the co-conspirators owed the tax on the money received as ordinary income.     Those who cover-up the fraud (such as Jerome Larkin and his minions SO, LBG, SS, MS, etc.) also owe the taxes due as a joint and several liability.
4.       Pick-ups.
In several of the Florida estates and in the Sykes case the miscreants have managed to get Court orders that attached property that was not part of the disabled person’s estate.      Theft is a taxable event even if a Court approves it.
For instance.    In one Florida Estate the guardian and the Court arbitrarily took possession and control over the property of one of the objecting family members.    It was clear that this control was obtained for the purpose of shutting the dissent to the elder cleansing life shut down.     The minute the guardian and Court took control of the funds that we not part of the estate each of the co-conspirators (including the Judge’s X and Y who should have known better) owed the United States of America the ordinary income taxes due.   (Constructive receipt).     These taxes vested.
In a similar manner in the Sykes estate, the commandeering of Gloria Sykes hazard insurance settlement resulted in tax liability for the guardian, the two guardian ad litem, the corrupt jurist, the attorney who was aware of and part of the theft, Jerome Larkin and his crew who tried to cover it up and everyone who joined in the conspiracy.    The taxes that they owed are ordinary income.
In some of the cases, and in particular the Florida case the theft was covered up by the corrupt jurist awarding Attorney fees from the stolen money.     The award of attorney fees and court costs is an independent act.    Money is fungible!     The fact that some taxes were paid (or will be paid) on the attorney fees is incidental and does not defray the Federal and State taxes due.    The entire fund is ordinary income and must be reported in the year of the theft as ordinary income on the tax return.    No credit is given to the criminals for paying taxes on attorney fees or other costs that are claimed to be paid out of the stolen funds.   The only credit that they are entitled to is for taxes specifically paid on the stolen funds.
The Sykes case is a corner stone case that has almost all of the pernicious events occurring therein.      The statutory protections were all ignored by a corrupt jurist and his cohorts.     The corrupt judicial officials were protected by the Supreme Court justices of Illinois and the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission and its director Jerome Larkin.    Larkin acted through attorneys who demonstrated amorality and avarice as they protected their co-conspirators from an Honest investigation.   18 USCA 371 addresses this situation and defines the fact that all who did overt acts in pursuance of the elder cleansing are co-conspirators and jointly and severally liable for not only the damages but the ordinary income taxes.     (There is no benefit of the doubt for corrupt public and judicial officials who elect to prey on the elderly and the disabled – the State and the United States of America should be able to collect the income taxes due in full and without unjust delay.)

[1] A real estate appraisal varies as it is opinion.   In the Fairway Preserve Condominium frauds, the developer was able to obtain appraisals of condo units for $350,000, while the Count appraiser appraised the same units for $100,000.00.     Historically, lender appraisals are lower than insurance appraisals.     The real appraisal occurs when the property is sold to a purchaser who is not controlled by either the real purchaser or the seller – or their representatives.   In the Sykes case because of the location, zoning potential, and size of the lot the $700,000 value is a bit frugal.

Warnings from Roseanne Miller–Radiation in US reaching critical levels

Posted on by
1

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/06/20/your-radiation-this-week-no-12/

Radiation comes from a variety of industries, but nuclear power and weapons manufacturing is huge, huge.  It is interesting the Pope finally declared it a sin to make weapons and not to do it.  Thank you.  Finally.

The US is one of the larges weapons manufacturers in the world.  The top 10 manufacturers of weapons are located here.  Landmines and other hidden explosives can last for years and ruin a country (see article on bomb sniffing rats in Cambodia).

It’s time to stop the destruction of the world by all sources–probate court, weapons and manufacturers and pollution creating sources of energy.

Normal levels of radiation 30 years ago in US cities were 0 to 20.  Now we are seeing levels in certain cities near 1000.  The article shows a picture of Marie Curie’s hands near the end of her life, with the ends clearly shriveled and fingers missing. That’s the effect of radiation on health.

From Ken Ditkowsky and Gloria Sykes–the cover ups continue

Posted on by
Reply

Posted with permission.  Please continue to pray for Gloria and her Mom and their family.  Gloria has been through far too much excruciating pain.

Dear Ken, and all CC’s and Bcc’s…

Today the U.S. Supreme Court announced a landmark decision which, grants equal protection and due process for a class of people we’ve labeled gay and lesbian – who like all of us have the right to love, associate and be with whomever he or she wants.  Similarly, I pledge today and moving forward, that all people, including the elderly and disabled should have the same equal protections under law and due process, and have the right to associate with whomever they want, including adult children as adult children of elderly or disabled,  should have equal protections under law and due process to associate with, right to love, and be with their parent or loved one who just happen to be elderly or disabled.   In sum, as gays and lesbians asked for dignity in the eyes of the law and today prevailed – I’m founding the Mary G. Sykes Foundation, Inc., will, in fact, be able to raise the funds we all need to further the cause, such as  ***.  Love must win when it comes to the overt discrimination against the elderly and disabled.

I was in this game because of the LOVE I have for my mother, and the LOVE she had for me and her sister, Yolanda.  Although my mother’s death was unfortunate and premature – she had miles to go and a long bucket list she was prevented from achieving—before she died, mother died for a good cause: I remain in the game in order to honor her.

In 1967 CBS news did a documentary titled, HOMOSEXUALS.  The network couldn’t get any sponsors or advertisers.  2 out of 3 American’s were disgusted by gay and lesbian  relationships – and so, men and women who LIVED and LOVED the same sex, hid their preferences.  I had a very dear friend who was gay and my parents, knowing this, treated him like they treated all of my friends, with great respect and love.  I never knew there was so much hate and discrimination alive then, and quite honestly, as I matured and became more independent, I never experienced the hate crimes, which were and continue to headline the media.   Love was never a ‘straight’ thing.  It was a human thing.  Today was a good day and the majority of justices, so called liberals – did what was right.  Equal justice prevailed today.  So much has changed in the last 50 years and today, no State can discriminate against a man or woman because of their sexual preference – because of the person they chose to love and associate with.

With this most historical decision today by the U.S. Supreme Court, and as important, the removal of the Confederate Flags that caused so much hate and hate crimes in the South, we, true advocates must stand together, arm and arm, and end Court sanctioned discrimination against the elderly and disabled, and the appointment of plenary GUARDIANSHIP  of elderly and disabled people: this conduct and actions of State agencies is not just violations of the Title II of the ADA, but also, HATE CRIMES  against a class of people who, not only lose all their rights protected under the Constitution to, among other rights, associate with, and love whomever they chose, but, like my mother, are intentionally isolated, over medicated, murdered, and in most cases, cremated and their wealth is distributed between the Cottage industry of attorneys who earn their living by preying on the elderly and disabled and abuse our judicial for personal financial gain, court appointed guardians, such as Carolyn Toerpe, and private institutions such as Silverado Memory Care Center(s) and Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. – as well as Hospice industry, and private medical professionals who get kickbacks.  It is time we  too progress forward arm and arm – no heroes, no agendas, no egos.

Guardianships are unconstitutional.  Who will join me and walk the talk of equal rights under law and STOP the use of our Probate courts and the appointment of guardians of Americas most vulnerable.  “Let America Be America Again, Let it be the dream it use to be.  Let it be the pioneer on the plan.  Seeking a home wher he himself is free.  America was never America to me.  Let America be the dream the dreamer dreamed.  Let it be that great strong land of love.  Where never kings connive nor tyrants’ scheme. Than any man be crushed by one above.  It was never America to me….” Langston Hughes, 1902 -1967.

There was no America for my mother the last 6 years.  This is a pain cut much deeper because Mary G. Sykes, is/was my mother and I know it was her LOVE for me and her sister Yolanda, that kept her strong and healthy for as long as she could and so, Carolyn Toerpe and her attorneys, Stern, Farenga, Schmiedel, et al, had no choice but to murder her ….

As my mother’s death marks not just a turning point in our history, it’s a reminder of the wrongful deaths of too many elderly and disabled people trapped in financially exploitive, abusive, discriminatory guardianship, where thus far, no person has been able to prevail under any Federal court and sadly, a bad pleading by Mr. Struck (Struck v. Cook County Public Guardian), a young man who himself had a disablility, only want to LOVE and associate with his mother who was under guardianship, is being cited, along with Sykes I and Sykes II U.S. District Court decisions – although very, very good pleadings – there was no America for my mother, for Annie’s mother, for Struck’s mother, for Rudy’s mother, for countless other loved ones who were wrongfully appointed plenary guardians and discriminated against.

Let me close by saying this.  For Cook County law enforcement, and the Naperville Police who elected to turn a blind eye to the truth, you now have an opportunity to do right.  For the people who have elected to do what you must to discredit me, now is your time to rethink your positions, and do the right thing.  And for the rest of you who have either elected to stay uninvolved, or simply didn’t understand, your contributions, whether volunteer, or monitory, or even just signing a petition, it’s time to step up.

To quote Mr. Hughes, “Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark.

And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?

I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,

I am the Negro bearing slavery’s scars.

I am the red man driven from the land,

I am the immigrant clutching the hope I  seek,

And finding only the same old stupid plan

Of a dog eat dog, of mighty crush of the weak.

I am the young man, full of strength and hope

Tangled in that ancient endless chain

Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land!

Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of the satisfying need!

Of work the men!  Of take the pay!

Of owning everything for one’s own  greed!

I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil.

I am the worker sold to the machine.

I am the Negro, servant to you all.

I am the people, humble, hungry, mean –

Hungry yet today despite the dream,

Beaten yet today – O, Pioneers!

I am the man who never got ahead.

The poorest worker bartered through the years.

Yet I am the one who dreamt our basic dream.

In the Old World while still a serf of kings.

Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave..

That even yet its mighty during dings

In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned

That’s made America the land it has become…

THIS IS IN HONOR OF MY MOTHER, MARY G. SYKES.

The question is?

Who wants to help create the America we all can live free?

Who wants to join me, and create an America where there are no Guardianships of people who are elderly or disabled people, and all people have equal protections under LAW and where Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act is upheld and no person, elderly or disabled,– or their loved ones, are discriminated against. No one should be isolated or denied association with their loved ones(s) just because he or she is elderly or disabled.

The court sanctioned HATE CRIMES must stop now.

In my mother’s name, HELP ME CREATE A BETTER AMERICA …

Healthy Regards,

Gloria Jean Sykes
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:55:25 +0000
From: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
To: gloami@msn.com; askdoj@usdoj.gov; civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov; matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov; verenusl@gmail.com; joanne@justice4every1.com; timlahrman@aol.com; nasga.org@gmail.com; jdit@aol.com; chicago@ic.fbi.gov; drditkowsky@aol.com; tips@tribune.com; letters@suntimes.com; janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com; bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com; foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com; ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com; sa3456@msn.com; statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov; fiduciarywatch@gmail.com; aclu@aclu.org; isba@list.isba.org; scottcevans@hotmail.com; ecarter@atg.state.il.us; glenest03@yahoo.com; bstone12@hotmail.com; prov2828@hotmail.com; loamu@aol.com; illinois.ardc@gmail.com; sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov; 3d@mail.americanbar.org; ilhouse51@sbcglobal.net; ilrep49@sbcglobal.net; dsaltoun@atg.state.il.us; information@elderaffairs.org; msmart@iardc.org; sopryszek@iardc.org
CC: schwagerlawfirm@live.com; tips@cbschicago.com; newseditors@wsj.com; llessura@gmail.com; jnjgldmn@aol.com; tvfields@oh.rr.com; webmaster@abajournal.com; support@wsj.com; acluofillinois@aclu-il.org; member@email.aarp.org; nkarp@aarp.org; diversitycommission@americanbar.org; contact_aging@aging.senate.gov; zamirkatan@aol.com; 60m@cbsnews.com; newseditors@dowjones.com
Subject: COMPLAINT TO THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION = pursuant to Rule 8.3 and COMPLAINT TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO 18 USCA 4.
The allegations that Ms. Sykes makes are very serious.   They are consistent with not only events that have been alleged in other Illinois Probate cases, but, with other events that have occurred in the Sykes case 09 P 4585.    The very same misconduct has been ignored and ‘covered up’ by Jerome Larkin, Melissa Smart, Sharon Opryszek, Lea Black and others at the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.    Pursuant to 18 USCA 4, 371, 241, 242, 1341 et al we have demanded an honest investigation.    As attorney misconduct has been noted herein pursuant to Rule 8.3 the IARDC has been notified.   The reaction has been for Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators to file intellectually dishonest pleadings and prosecutions designed to cover up the criminal activities being perpetrated against Mary Sykes and others similarly situated.

I am forwarding this material to law enforcement and once again Demanding an HONEST INVESTIGATION OF THESE ENTIRE SITUATION.

This situation includes but is not limited to:

1) Mary Sykes 09 P 4585

2) the theft of Gloria Sykes’ claim proceeds from Kemper Insurance

3) the false imprisonment (chaining of Gloria Sykes) and the criminal intimidation of her by judicial officials.

4) the Alice Gore case

5) the hundreds of elder cleansing cases in the Probate Court

6) the ‘cover up’

7) the failure of the miscreants to inventory and report literally hundreds of millions of dollars of assets stolen from disabled estates – incluidng kickbacks to nursing homes etc.

8) the rampant violation of law by judicial officials and those acting in concert with them.

9) the cover up – and violations of State, Federal and Constitutional law.

10) the failure of attorneys and others employed at the IARDC to not disclose their assets as required by State Law for all public employees

11) ******

The breach of a fiduciary relationship is a taxable event and incurs State and Federal Tax liability.    A conspiracy creates joint and several liability including the tax liability.    Jerome Larkin and those who work in concert with them thus have joint and several liability for the millions of dollars stolen from these estates  – whether inventoried or not.    The use of the IARDC commission for illegal and nefarious purposes is unacceptable.

Democracy is not a spectator sport and is fragile.    The actions described by Ms. Sykes and others is a terrorist attack on America!   It cannot be tolerated any longer.

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

From: GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com>
To: “kenditkowsky@yahoo.com” <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>; Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>; FBI- <civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>; matt senator kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>; LUCIUS VERENUS <verenusl@gmail.com>; JoAnne M. Denison <joanne@justice4every1.com>; Tim Lahrman NASGA <timlahrman@aol.com>; NASGA <nasga.org@gmail.com>; Judy Ditkowsky <jdit@aol.com>; Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>; BILL DITKOWSKY <drditkowsky@aol.com>; Chicago Tribune <tips@tribune.com>; steve huntly sun times <letters@suntimes.com>; Janet Phelan <janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com>; Bev Cooper <bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com>; FOX News Network LLC <foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com>; Ginny Johnson <ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com>; “sa3456@msn.com” <sa3456@msn.com>; states attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>; Fiduciary Watch <fiduciarywatch@gmail.com>; Y. ACLU <aclu@aclu.org>; ISBA Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>; scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>; “ecarter@atg.state.il.us” <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>; Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>; Barbara Stone <bstone12@hotmail.com>; RosANNa Miller <prov2828@hotmail.com>; Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC <loamu@aol.com>; Illinois ARDC <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>; Sherrif Dart <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: The Cover -up – The letter that allegedly got Journalist and Investigative producer Gloria Sykes a ‘beating’ that the States Attorney of Cook County would not prosecute.

Dear All,

I recently located the email below that attached a copy of a letter/complaint I sent to the ARDC about attorneys Deborah Jo Soehlig and Peter Schmiedel.  Burried in the letter is a notation that I found the lack of the ARDC’s interest to investigate wrongdoers, such as Soehlig and Schmiedel, attorneys who misuse the judicial for their personal financial gain, was like the John Wayne Gacy case, where numerous parents and interested people filed complaints with the Chicago  Board of Education regarding Gacy, but all complaints went uninvestigated if not simply ignored and tossed in the trash.  WELL MY MOTHER SUDDENDLY DIED on May 23, 2015 at 2:47 a.m, and Peter Schmiedel was actively involved in covering up the cause of death, claiming she “died of natural causes because she was old” and of Alzheimer Disease.But now I ahead of the story.

On May 22, 2015, I received a phone call from Carolyn Toerpe: it was about 3 p.m. on Memorial Day Weekend. I was driving on Lake Shore Drive, just north of the City when my phone rang and I thought hard about not answering it — but I did, because I thought that it was my mother.  It was Toerpe who commanded that if I wanted to see my mother I had to be somewhere by 5 p.m., I couldn’t tell any other person, and by the way, “Mother took a turn for the worse”.  Naperville is a good 60-90 minute drive on a normal business day at 3 p.m. but on a Friday holiday weekend.  Toerpe text me the address: it was of Silverado Memory Care.

I arrived at 4:55 p.m., and leaving Shaggy in the car as I thought I’d have but 5 minutes with Mom, I was stopped by people at the front desk, who would not let me know the room number, but instead, had a young woman escort me back — the young woman had never met my mother, and was a “day social worker”.

When I arrived at “the room” the number on the room was concealed, and the room, dark.  I ran in to see my Aunt Yo and Kathie at my mother’s side: my mother’s sister Josephine at the foot of the bed.  Two or three strangers sitting or standing on the opposite side of the room next to another bed, where Carolyn Toerpe was sitting, and her husband Fred standing close by.  My mother laid, fully dressed, in the bed, with oxygen in her nose, but I thought she was dead.  I dropped my purse on a chair, and climbed in bed with my mother, and began to kiss her, and gently placed my hand on her cheek: She was breathing beautifully and showed no signs of death.  I placed my hand on my mother’s left hand and she squeezed it.  She then held my hand as I held hers, and I cried out, “What the hell is going on here?  I’m the POA of healthcare… ” and Toerpe cut me off saying, “Well, you know Gloria, Mother has dementia.” I argued back, “Dementia doesn’t put a person in a coma like state.  What medications are you giving her?”

At that point I looked at this white haired woman who stood stoic in the back of the room and asked her who she was. She told me she was the “Administrator” who “knows” my mother “well” and a “patient very special to” her.  I responded, “I don’t know you.  You don’t know my mother and please get out and leave family some private time”. She not only refused to leave, but two other people from the center came into the  room and stood or sat in the room, while Toerpe smirked at me: yep, Toerpe showing she was “in control”.

Looking around the room I noticed three family photographs hanging, or staged on two walls.  A picture with mom, dad, Toerpe and her husband and his two children above the bed, with a picture of Toerpe, me and our brother Edward when we were children and a wedding picture of mom and dad.  Nothing else appeared to belong to mother, except for her gym shoes, which looked as if they had been recently worn, and placed, as my mother would, near the bed but not in her way.  Mother didn’t have her wedding and engagement rings on, and didn’t have the 18 Ct gold chain and the many 14 or 18 ct gold pieces which she wore all the time and ever day.  Mom was wearing a brown turtle neck sweater and black slacks and white socks.  I checked her feet and ankles and noted no swelling: they were warm.  I continued to hold and stroke mother’s hand, and speak to her.  “Where are her hearing aids?” I asked.  The Administrator and the day social worker looked at one another and the day social worker said, “I know nothing about any hearing aids.”  I said, “Well, she has a pair of high end, digital hearing aids: find them.  Put them in so she can hear me.  Toerpe shook her head, “no”.

Kathie Bakken suggested we play mother’s favorite music, “Ave Maria”  I pulled out my IPhone and Kathie was checking her phone, when I noted Toerpe speaking to the Administrator who came over to me and told me to put my phone away. “I have an order from the court” she said.  And I replied, “I don’t give a damn about any orders from the court….”  I was told to put my IPhone away or I’d have to leave.  I responded, “You won’t even let my mother have any dignity or enjoyment, Carolyn” You are simply evil”. However, Kathie continued to look for mom’s favorite songs, and the Administrator stood near by, to make certain we couldn’t or didn’t take any photographs.  I placed Kathie’s phone close to mother’s good ear and all of a sudden, my Mother’s eyes began to move rapidly and she tried to speak, “I”, “I”, she said, and the Administrator announces that its time for me to go.  I said, “I am staying here as long as I want” to which the Administrator said, “Really, it’s time for you to go”.  I didn’t leave and we played songs for mother and twice more she tried to speak and squeeze my hand.  An hour and 30 minutes passed and Kathie reminded me I had Shaggy in the car and it was very warm outside.  I said I was going to bring Shaggy in and at first the social worker said it was ok but then the Administrator told me that since I didn’t bring him in when I came in, I couldn’t bring him in. I repeated that he was a service dog and that I didn’t think I had but 5 minutes with mother.  She said no and it was time for me to leave.

I kissed mom and told her that she should go and be with God and daddy and her son Edward, and her mother and father, and that she needed to get away from all this evil.  I told her I’ve tried everything and that I would continue to do whatever I could in her honor.  I told her I had to leave again, that Toerpe was forcing me to leave and then I kept crying and kissing her and telling her how much I loved her and I had to go.

The Administrator walked me put and as I approached the locked doors, I saw a family talking to an employee of the center and they were talking about placing their father in their care.  I said, “Do your homework. This is not a safe place for your loved one.  Do not place him here….”  And the Administrator threatened to call security, and I said, “I welcome you calling security.”  I made a purposeful scene and let the five or six people in the lobby know what the Administrator had done to my mother, and left by saying, “And they won’t even give my mother her hearing aids…imagine that?”

At 2:45 a.m. the next morning I woke with a stay and had this huge smile on my face.

At 8:30 am I called Silverado and asked about my mother and I was told that I had to call Carolyn Toerpe.

I spoke with Maryanne who told me to fax over the POA of healthcare and then she’d tell me anything I want to know.

At 10 a I faxed over the POA from Staples so I’d have a good record.

At about noon, I called when I got to Naperville and was told Maryanne was not there and the guy told me he got the POA and it’s a fraud and hung up.

At 1 p.m. I met Scott Evans at the Naperville Police and called 911.  An officer told me that he was very familiar with the case and that I was harrassing Toerpe.  I then said I wanted a standby police to get Hannah and the same officer met me at Toerpe’s home, that looked as if the place was vacant.  At about 3 p.m. Toerpe returned with Fred and parked the car in the driveway and said nothing to me.  I got a call from Kathie who told me my mother was dead. I spoke to the Naperville Police officer and he told me that the Naperville Animal Control wrote him an email that said I abused Hannah.  The Naperville Police went into the home and returned telling me that Hannah belonged to Toerpe.

Scott and I left in separate cars and I drove a few blocks away and parked the car.  I collapsped in tears. Then as if my mother was sitting next to me in the car, I found all this strength and I called the DuPage County cororner’s office. I was told everything and in particular, that Mom was at Suerths Furner Home, where she wanted to be laid out.  I called Suerths, and spoke to Dennis, one of the twins who own the place and both who I went to grammar and high school.  I told him not to touch mom that I was going to have an autopsy.  He told me mother arrived there at 11 a.m. and that Toerpe demanded she be embalmed. I went to Suerths where I visited my mother.  Her hair was chopped off as if recently cut to stop me from pulling out any hairs for testing.  Her lip had a recent sore and was swollen, which wasn’t there at 6:30 p.m. when I left eight hours before her death.  Her ankles were not swollen or purple, and either were her fingers: she showed no signs of death or long time terminal disease.

Dennis told me that he would not move mother without a court order.  I retained an attorney, who Dennis told the same to, but we couldn’t get a death certificate.  No one had a death certificate.  It took over two weeks before Kathie got a death certificate which I sent to my attorney: on it, mother’s date of birth was wrong and the spelling of her maiden name was wrong.  There are other very suspicious things on the Death certificate Kathie got from DuPage, however, my attorney went into DuPage to get an order for an autopsy and Peter Schmiedel was present and told the court that Toerpe entombed mother on June 4.

I will say no more at this time other than if mother truly had late stage dementia and died from, let’s say, starvation because her brain stopped sending signals to eat, which could be a late state dementia, then Schmiedel and Toerpe would have sat back and laughed at me, let me spend the thousands of dollars for an autopsy and Toerpe could have had the final laugh.  In stead, just like Toerpe and Schmiedel isolating mother from all family and friends in order to keep the truth that mother was healthy, articulate and fully sane and ***, they first quickly destroyed all evidence of the drugs by the embalming, and then, did not publicize mother’s death so friends and family could say goodby, but had a very very small service (mother’s friend and priest was not there) and entombed her quickly.  Toerpe didn’t even spend any money for flowers or living plants and there’s no sign of any ceremonial at the crypt.

On the same day or soon after, Schmiedel went to Judge MacCarthy and filed a motion for his fees.  The guardianship is over and all Toerpe can do is collect, but not pay out, and  yet, without any family being notified or having an opportunity to contest — not that that would make any difference — on the same day Schmiedel filed his papers, he was given at least $45,000 from (my) assets held at the Probate clerks’ office in the Estate of Mary G. Sykes.  Further, Toerpe’s accounting for 2014 was approved, and of course, no one was able to review the accounting except for I’m certain Adam Stern and Peter Schmiedel… but wait, the guardianship was not closed, but continued 60 day — again when it should have been closed within 30 days of mother’s death.

And none of the Cook County law enforcement agents beleive that something didn’t go terrible wrong and that Schmiedel and his troops didn’t claim all the assets for mother’s care somehoe ended up in their back pockets… with Schmiedel and the lawfirm he is associated with receiveing over $175,000 and Stern, over $60,000 with Cynthia Farenga absent from court in this case for over two year… but it is beileve she got $30,000 with Harvey Jack Waller getting $17000. and of course, Toerpe getting the rest of the estate with over or close to $1 million of assets.

Like Dr. Bennet Blum stated in a 20009 interview, when adult children are involved, the one who is appointed guardian normally will over medicate, suffocate, and MURDER the elder and then creamate.  We don’t know if somehow Peter Schmiedel had my mother creamated to truly destroy all the evidence.

Yep, all these complaints, all of Ditkowsky’s, mine and other people’s request for investigation, and just like Gacy, my mother had to die, to be murdered, in order for someone to now investigate.  It is being investigated, BTW, and so, the end of the documentary and the book is not one which I had hoped.

THE ONLY WAY OUT OF AN ABUSIVE, FINANCIALLY EXPLOITATIVE, DISCRIMINATORY GUARDIANSHIP IS DEATH BY MURDER.

I was told this on day one when I was in court with an attorney for the Order of Protection mother filed to stop Toerpe from doing all she did: a person my the name of Linda *** came up to me and said, “If you don’t get your mother freed soon, she will murdered and die a pauper”.  I didn’t believe her.  (Linda was harassed, harmed, and ended up herself in treatment for depression, et al, and her mother suddenly died, just like my mother…”)

Healthy Regards,

Gloria Jean Sykes

BELIEVE (Be-Live) LLC

(773) 910-3310 (Cell)

(773) 751-1310 (Fax)

(855)-376-0040 (Office)
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 13:48:46 +0000
From: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
To: askdoj@usdoj.gov; civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov; matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov; verenusl@gmail.com; joanne@justice4every1.com; timlahrman@aol.com; nasga.org@gmail.com; jdit@aol.com; chicago@ic.fbi.gov; drditkowsky@aol.com; tips@tribune.com; letters@suntimes.com; janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com; bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com; foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com; ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com; sa3456@msn.com; statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov; fiduciarywatch@gmail.com; aclu@aclu.org; isba@list.isba.org; scottcevans@hotmail.com; ecarter@atg.state.il.us; glenest03@yahoo.com; bstone12@hotmail.com; prov2828@hotmail.com; loamu@aol.com; illinois.ardc@gmail.com; sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov
Subject: The Cover -up – The letter that allegedly got Journalist and Investigative producer Gloria Sykes a ‘beating’ that the States Attorney of Cook County would not prosecute.
We’ve heard, but have not verified the accusation that Mr. Jerome Larkin has some sort of financial relationship with the Attorney that journalist Gloria Sykes wrote to the IARDC complaining.     Of course as Larkin does not file the ETHICS STATEMENT that is required of all persons receiving remuneration in the form of salary from public offices of the State of Illinois such remains a secret.   So much for ethics at the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

TO:  The ARDC Illinois

RE: Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig of Fischel & Kahn

To Whom It May Concern,

Yesterday, February 17, 2012, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig stood before a federal bankruptcy judge, (Pamela Hollis) and LIED.  This is not the first time she (and her colleague of Fischel & Kahn–Peter Schmeidel) misrepresented the facts to a FEDERAL JUDGE, or even a STATE JUDGE, but this time she did it with vindictive retaliation in order to further ‘bully’ me and dispossess me from not only my property “Homestead”, but also all property of my bankruptcy estate and procure a favorable ruling in order for her to have a huge financial gain.  It is a matter of fact that:

(1)  Deborah Soehlig will NOT get paid one penny for her unethical and lawlessness services provided to her client Carolyn Toerpe, the Plenary Guardian, unless she successfully does me great harm (renders me penniless and homeless in order to silence me);
(2)  Deborah Soehlig is giving Carolyn Toerpe legal advice on how to financially exploit, willfully deprive, and otherwise, perpetrate egregious and deadly elder abuses against my mother, Mary G. Sykes,
(3) Deborah Soehlig knows she is before a Federal Judge without standing: that she or her client, are not “creditors” and she is willfully interfering and abusing me in a proceeding that she does not belong involved in;
(4) Deborah Soehlig knows or should know the law(s) and the Bankruptcy Codes and the Rules of procedure, but still, she pretended that she had me served notice regarding her Motion to Adopt she (allegedly) filed with the U. S. District Court in re the Estate of Gloria Jean Sykes, when in fact I was never properly served and the Affiant lied;
and,
(5) Deborah Soehlig knows or should know that her client is a ‘fraud’ and that there is but a “Naked Trust” or the trust property was improperly claimed in the Mary G. Sykes Trust rendering it thereby invalid, and that her client has no right to possession of the property at 6014 N. Avondale (“Subject Property” or “Homestead”) in whole or in part: that said, Deborah Soehlig knows or should know that the illegal and wrongful eviction perpetrated against me dictated that I be dispossessed of the second floor only and that her client LIED to the Deputy Sheriff, creating false statements against me, in order to have me forcibly removed from the entire Subject Property against my will or consent.  Deborah Jo Soehlig knows or should know that the Sheriff placed their purportedly legal sticker of dispossession on the second floor but that her client changed the locks on the first floor in order to dispossess me of the entire premises–an action which was false and unwarranted under the allegedly proper court order the Sheriff had attained color of authority thereunder.

Attorney, Deborah Jo. Soehlig, not unlike her ethically challenged colleague attorney Peter Schmiedel, have violated the same codes of ethics and professionalism and so the ARDC only need to refer to my numerous prior complaints against attorney Peter Schmiedel to pursue their investigation.  Deborah Jo Soehlig knowingly has committed serious torts and criminal acts no less than that amounting to acts of civil terrorism against both my mother and I for her own greed and financial gain, and she told me yesterday that she will “dictate when or if I get my personal property, my tools of the trade and intellectual property,  and or any of my confidential legal documents– including evidence much needed to prevail in the Federal Cases”, back into my possession. She LIED to the federal judge yesterday when she knows that the Order of October 25, 2012 is being appealed and that the court lacked jurisdiction to address that order — and yet, Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig created the false and improper illusion that I was a “dangerous” person and her client was “in need of protection” and therefore a security company was hired to protect Carolyn Toerpe and Toerpe’s property at the Subject Property.  Deborah Soehlig knows that none of the property currently housed at 6014 N. Avondale belongs to her client, or has ever in fact belonged to her client.

I have submitted numerous claims and requested protection under the ARDC’s Client Protection Program and I have been repeatedly denied. The loss of the properties of my estate, the egregious lies  narrated by attorney(s) such as Deborah Jo Soehlig have caused me (1) loss of money and property as a result of the intentional dishonest statement by attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig;
(2) that Deborah Jo Soehlig has wrongfully misappropriated or converted, is using, and withholding my money and my property;
(3) that these loses occurred while Deborah Jo Soehlig was acting as Carolyn Toerpe’s lawyer and in a fiduciary capacity related to the practice of law (attorney for the alleged Plenary Guardian of the Estate of Mary G. Sykes);
(4) that because of the huge losses of property, income, et. al, due to Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig’s deliberate fraud on the court which she perpetrated in several court proceedings, she must be investigated and disbarred, or at least suspended;
(5) that I have made reasonable efforts to pursue civil remedies and as late as yesterday, in motioning the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for a Rule to Show Cause based upon numerous misrepresentations, half truths and even outright lies, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig, after court in the hall when I once again attempted to “work things out” and “set up a cooperative time to procure my properties while we work out the adversary proceedings– the Appeal, the ADA claim and the section 2-1401 that her client will be served today or tomorrow by the DuPage County Sheriff’s office–she has REFUSED TO OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE OR REASONABLE COOPERATION WITH THE INTENT TO BULLY ME, TO CAUSE ME MUCH PAIN AND SUFFERING in an attempt to silence me!

My losses have been massive since Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig first became involved in these court proceedings relating to the Estate of Mary G. Sykes and these losses are due in full to her negligence, her lack of reasonable investigation into the facts and affidavits previously placed on file with the ARDC and posted on this blog,  and her gross malpractice (rather than intentional dishonesty).
Some of those losses (financial and emotional), occurred because she and her client is not in fact an ‘creditor’ of my Estate in Bankruptcy.  Rather, because she is falsely parading around in the Bankruptcy court as such, my claim is for lost profits, consequential damages, and costs to recover my personal, professional, and legal litigation properties. (Deborah Jo Soehlig has and continues to obstruct justice and she further instructs and advises her client on how to obstruct justice as well, inter alia).

To ignore the egregious and wrongful conduct of Deborah Jo Soehlig, who has LIED on motions filed, verbally LIED to state and federal court judges (the transcripts of proceedings where she has appeared are replete with such lies) and yesterday, she lied again to Judge Hollis in order to influence a Judge and discredit me for her own financial gain.  Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig’s motivation is simple: greed and money!  She made an agreement with her client Carolyn Toerpe that the only way she will get paid is if she does me great harm, renders me penniless and homeless, and in doing so, illegally sells my mother’s home (and forces the sale of my home — “No, hell no I won’t let her do that and neither should the ARDC”), for her own personal financial gain.

You can easily check on all of these facts.  Deborah Jo Soehlig cannot prove or show that she has been paid for her services over the past two years she’s represented Carolyn Toerpe.  Her and her firm are waiting to sell the Subject Property and my home as well (“my Homestead”) by forcing a partition proceeding when she knew or should have known that I paid for the home in full, paid the mortgage and I was the only individual residing on the premise and that this arrangement was well known by reputable (that is, most all) of my family members–not those who stand to financially gain by the sale of my Homestead.

The financial exploitation, the willful deprecation of both my mother and myself is so blatant, that even a challenged child can see the FACTS that Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig is using her position and office as an attorney, and using the courts in order to not only churn assets of our estates, but also to set a course that will ultimately ‘murder’ my mother. And inasmuch as Deborah Jo Soehlig threatened my life and livelihood yesterday outside the Courtroom of Judge Hollis in a direct pursuit of  what attorney Peter Schmiedel wrote in an email to my one time attorney Joel Brodsky, that the law firm of Fischel and Kahn will do whatever they must to render me penniless and homeless for their own benefit (to get paid).

The legal profession depends upon the public’s trust.  It’s been over two (2) years since I first filed a complaint against attorney Peter Schmiedel who appeared for the first time as Toerpe’s client on February 10, 2010 and I reported to the Probate Court that he was going to sell my mother’s home and my home too for his own financial advantage and gain.  Because the ARDC has failed to act, failed to investigate, et al, Peter Schmiedel and Deborah Jo Soehlig’s wrongful acts amounting to little more than civil terrorism, I am now homeless and penniless and without any of my personal and professional property as well as my intellectual properties needed to generate an income, and of course all my legal documents.  That said, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig, if not stopped, she will assuredly not only instruct her client Carolyn Toerpe not just on how to murder Mary G. Sykes, but also on how to murder me as well.  You at the ARDC continue to laugh, continue to charge innocents like Kenneth Ditkowsky or JoAnne Denison, and while ignoring the obvious, you are empowering criminals wearing legal suits and carrying legal briefcases and pleadings to do great harm to the exact people and general public that you, as a oversight agency, were lawfully appointed by the State of Illinois to protect.

I am extremely fearful for my life. I fear for my mother’s life.  Meanwhile, Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig continues to LIE to Illinois Judges in order to obtain rulings that will fill, or which may be currently filling her pockets with the hard earned money of good American citizens who have repeatedly  reached out to the ARDC pleading for basic legal protection afforded to all.

I, and I’m certain other innocents, live in fear for their lives every day because of attorneys like Deborah Jo Soehlig.

FYI I have not received any confirmation that the ARDC is dong any investigation on attorney Peter Schmiedel after so many complaints were filed against him, that it appears that this is a John Wayne Gacy situation, that the ARDC will do nothing until many die — and then, it will be simply too late.

The last words Deborah Jo Soehlig said to me yesterday as I ‘begged’ to arrange for a cooperative time for me to get my properties from the Subject Property, are “You can’t dictate to me.  We will dictate when, how, and if at all you get your property back.” She then turned on her heels and with her buddy, attorney Peter Schmiedel, simply walked away from me.  Other attorneys heard this and a couple walked up to me in shock!  Hitler is still alive and well…. is the ARDC going to allow Deborah Jo Soehlig to walk me (and my mother) into the Showers, too?

Right now, we’re both living in this Concentration Camp stage of hell on earth, and we can see not too far afield the Shower buildings which is assuredly the next step in this grisly process perpetrated with the assistance of the Schmeidel team.

Gloria Jean Sykes
Bon Ami Productions, Inc.
773.910-3310(cell)
773.631-9262 (fax and office line)

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

JoAnne Denison, Executive Director Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714 Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights Email me at JoAnne@Denisonlaw.com Cell Phone 773-255-7608 Work Ph 312-553-1300 or 847-600-3421 efax 312-376-8842 See our website at www.justice4every1.com Please note that this message may contain confidential or attorney client communications. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and destroy all emails you have received in both your inbox and trash or other folders which may contain same. Thank you.
‹ Previous | Next › | « Back to INBOX

© 2015 EarthLink. All Rights Reserved.
Members and visitors to the EarthLink Web site agree to abide by our Policies and Agreements
EarthLink Privacy Policy

From Ken Ditkowsky to another disillusioned Probate Victim

Posted on by
2

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 25, 2015 10:12 AM
To: RosANNa , Tracey Anne Miller , Marti Oakley , Andy Ostrowski , Bev Cooper , Elaine Renoire
Cc: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , Matt Senator Kirk , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , BILL DITKOWSKY , Chicago FBI , Chicago Tribune , Janet Phelan , SUNTIMES , fox news network llc , Diane Nash , Ginny Johnson , Fiduciary Watch , Cook County States Attorney , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “Y. ACLU” , aarp , Scott Evans , Edward Carter , Glenda Martinez , Barbara Stone , Candice Schwager , KRISTI HOOD , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Illinois ARDC , “tips@cbschicago.com” , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , “newseditors@wsj.com” , Cook Sheriff , Alyece Russell , Jay Goldman , Tom Fields , Eric Blair , “ABAJournal.com” , Nancy Vallone , Len Holland , “Jim (” , Martin Kozak , Robert Sarhan , Kathie Bakken , Doug Franks , John Howard Wyman , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Mary Richards , Martha Jantho , “Truthbetoldradio (” , ACLU of Illinois , “information@iardc.org” , Kevin Pizzarello , Wsj Lts , “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” , Greg Coleman , “newseditors@dowjones.com” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Harry Heckert , Sylvia Rudek NASGA , Marti Oakley , The Wall Street Journal , Doug Franks , Marty Prehn , Bettergov Info , “tips@abajournal.com” , Pam Zuckman NBC
Subject: Re: HATRED in the COURTS for PROFIT – Re: Fwd: Case# 164083

I am sorry that you feel so negative toward law enforcement.      I am also sorry that so many elders and family members of elders and disabled people join with you in their belief that law enforcement is either unwilling or unable to enforce the law.
The pain that you feel is universal.    We’ve all experienced the nameless, faceless bureaucrat.   Today he works not only for the government but the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker.    He is everywhere.   Call your internet provider!    After you’ve talked to the wrong department and have been transferred to fifty wrong departments the line goes dead!    If you speak to anyone with authority their supervisor is suffering from heat stroke in India.     Government always promises action, however, the action is too little too late. The classic was the fact that I wrote a letter to Senator Durbin (Illinois) complaining of the criminal activity in the Sykes case.     I pointed out that Mary Sykes had been literally kidnapped and now was being abused, isolated from her family and exploited.    Very promptly I received a letter from the Senator.   It contained a copy of a speech he gave extolling his virtue in protection social security.      I could care less whether the social security check arrived or not – it was going to be stolen by the miscreants and would further fund their criminal activities!
42 USCA 12203 prohibits retaliation for making an Americans With Disabilities Claim such as you are making.    Yes, I know that Justice Department is painfully slow in acting, if at all.     Yes, I am aware that the criminals use the State facilities to enhance their WAR ON THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED.    Indeed, I heard the frustration and know that piece by piece the Bill of Rights is being vitiated.     I watched Lanre Amu get drawn and quartered by bunch of racists because he was practicing Law while Black.    He and Crain’s Chicago Business   both took offense that a clout heavy judge refused to rescues herself and remained on the bench to judge the liability of a hospital that she was on the Board of Directors and that was represented by her brother.     The Illinois Supreme Court agreed with the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission and provided Mr. Amu with an interim suspension of his law license for having the audacity to complain that a clout heavy dishonest jurist was indeed dishonest!       Yes, the Supreme Court justices wore black sheets but no hoods when they made the decision.     I was not present so I do not know if they burned a cross on Mr. Amu’s lawn.    (I think not – he lives in a condominium!)
18 USCA 241 and 242 make the violation of Civil Rights a crime.     A civil right is “free speech.”    The recent Supreme Court cases make all content related and political speech immune from government interference.     JoAnne Denison and yours truly were openly and notoriously denied the right to demand an Honest investigation because two clout heavy guardian ad litem discovered that the calls were having some traction.    The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission and the Illinois Supreme Court once again donned with Black sheets and joined in the wrongful suppression of First Amendment and Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution.      (They did not burn a cross on my lawn – I never asked JoAnne if she had night rider problems.   She did have to endure some vandalism.   Law enforcement has not determined who is responsible).
Attorney General Lynch and Senator Mark Kirk have each indicated that they are actively engaged in the War on the Elderly and the Disabled on our side.    I received a telephone call from Senator Kirk’s office and General Lynch announced indictments of health care criminals and the fact that she has another 3000 on her plate.     Maybe there is more going on!
I’ve forwarded as many complaints as come my way to Justice and law enforcement.     I hope that they are being taken seriously as the assault on the elderly and the disabled is an assault on America’s core.   A single Jerome Larkin is a clear and present danger.      This ‘cover up’ of the scandal in the Probate division is inexcusable and his overt intellectual dishonesty is not only ethically challenged but amoral.    When I read the decision in the JoAnne Denison case I was sickened.       Imagine the ‘conscience of the legal profession’ being overtly dishonest as to what the words and phrases of the leading Supreme Court of the United States decision (Alvarez case) held.      The reprobate’s minions abandoned their intellectual dishonesty of prior years’ wherein they misrepresented the Sawyer case and now claimed that the Alvarez case gave them authority to regulate speech!  [1]
Indeed, so arrogant is Larkin and his co-conspirators that they have had almost a month to correct any error that might have occurred, but they stand steadfast in their dishonesty.     JoAnne remains in an interim suspension!      No proceedings are pending against the dishonest lawyers engaged in the criminal conspiracy.   Indeed, no proceeding has been brought against the dishonest lawyers who have pillaged estates of the elderly and the disabled!      Indeed the black sheeted Justices of the Supreme Court of Illinois – as they did during Operation Greylord – are four square positioned on the side of exploitation, isolation and abuse of the elderly and the disabled.
Yes – we understand.   BUT,   we elected our legal representatives and will elect others at the next election cycle.     It is only fair that we keep our elected representatives and law enforcement informed so that have the opportunity to do their jobs and earn public trust.     Here in Illinois we have a fiscal crisis.   Our state needs money –desperately!!!!!!        The loot from the Sykes case was over 2 million dollars and it is sure fire certainty that not one dime of Illinois or Federal Taxes has been paid by any of the miscreants.      Mary’s ¾ of a million dollar home was sold for a little over $200,000.00.     You can bet your bottom dollar that not one dime of the ¾ of million dollars has been reported on the 2014 tax return by Larkin, or those he acted in concert with.      It is assumed that after some mesne sales are consummated one or more of the co-conspirators will report a capital gain to cover-up the theft and get the Statute of Limitations running as to the fraud on Mary’s home.
My friends – have patience!    Keep reporting these incidents.    Democracy is not a spectator sport and it did not come to us cheap!
[1] Alvarez held that the government could not punish a liar who claimed to have won a Medal of Honor – and had not.    The Court clearly rejected government determining what content related speech was true and what was a lie.    This case was consistent with a bunch of cases that held that government could not regulate protests, violent video games, political speech including that by corporations etc.     Larkin claimed that an exception was carved out for him to regulate speech of persons who happened to have law degrees.   He cited a rejected argument as the Rule of Law as a clear ethically challenged act and such intellectual dishonesty as merits his disbarment along with that of every attorney who participated in such dishonesty.
PS-from Joanne Denison
Since my trial and when the ARDC went ballistic over my mentioning certain firey blazes at the Office of Public Guardian, I could not figure out what the problem was–until I asked around some other attorneys and found out what it was.  Turns out a certain ex-head of that department KNEW why the stairwells were locked and he KNEW that this presented a danger a danger to anyone present at 69 W Washington St.  Apparently a bunch of other attorneys know it too, and they thought it was corruption as usual and have not demanded an investigation.  We I have written the FBI demanding they reopen this case and demanding they question the attorney (now judge) in question so that 6 families in question can have closure.  If the allegations are true, I care not what the authorities do with him, other than remove him from a position enabling him to further do harm while he has no concept of ethics, justice, civility, compassion and Truth.
I grew up in Chicago and I’ve been a close follower of the Sun Time and Trib, so you know I am not immune to knowledge of dishonesty and lack of ethics, yet I still expect and demand it from those in office and those sitting in a judge’s chair.

(705 ILCS 205/4) (from Ch. 13, par. 4)
    Sec. 4. Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counsellor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:
    I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.

Another Probate Victim to Pray for: Nancy Golin and her family in Santa Barbara, California

Posted on by
3

http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2007/07/when-protectors-abuse-golin-v-allenby.html#comment-form

From the Blog on Nancy by her parents:

Since her confinement, Nancy has suffered numerous physical and neurological injuries and abuses. She has lost the use of her hands, been hospitalized dozens of times for seizures and esophageal ruptures, five years of dental neglect causing her to lose almost half her teeth, been improperly subjected to destructive psychiatric drugging, and likely molestation. All of these injuries occurred while in SARC’s and APS’s care. Not the least of the harms, she is not allowed to see her parents except under extreme restrictions and she is not being allowed to go back home for reasons she cannot understand and no one purports to explain. The parents have been denied any say in her care or standing to litigate on her behalf.

I believe this story is on par with story of Nancy Vallone and her beloved niece.  What I don’t understand is how after years of posts, and dozens of complaints to the authorities, police and otherwise nothing is ever done about the abuse and isolation of disabled adults suffering from autism.

They are systematically abused and isolated in “group homes” (of abuse and destruction).

Please pray for these young ladies who have suffered terrible:  Nancy Golin and Danielle Rene Murphy.

Information on Danielle can be found elsewhere on this blog and at:

http://ppjg.me/2013/01/13/ts-radio-nancy-vallone-discusses-the-horrible-abuse-of-her-neice-at-the-hands-of-ohio-dodd-and-apsi/

JoAnne

Response to Rosanna’s complaint about Atty Fansler–a classic

Posted on by
2

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwOGFYSVFKTy1zNTA/view?usp=sharing

As many of you know, Rosanne Miller of Ohio has been fighting for years to get justice in her mother’s case and now her father’s case.  It is well known that her father, Claire was left with a miscreant brother where hundreds of thousands of dollars disappeared while a certain court appointed attorney, Fansler, allowed Mr. Miller to live in deplorable, filthy conditions in the home, while Fansler took hefty attorneys fees and looked the other way. When Roseanne complained to the court, she was disparaged, maligned and told every which way, her complaints of abuse were not going to be heard and she was the villian in all of this!

Preposterous.  So she writes a complaint to the Ohio Supreme Court regarding the conduct of Fansler, an elder abuser who did nothing to prosecute the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars while her Father was left with the Brother to live in a stinking, dirty home, complete with a heavy dose of animal feces and filth.

Above is the response of the Ohio Supreme Court.

I am certain it is in line with our own Jerome Larkin’s policies to never, never investigate an Attorney who is in charge while substantial sums of money and property disappear, and the elder is found living in squalor.  Instead, make sure the court and the court appointed and connected attorneys blame someone else, disparage them and persecute and prosecute them to the hilt.  Always hand back reports of elder abuse to the abusers.  Cover it up.

But Ken is making inroads to one Senator in Illinois who has finally acknowledged hundreds of letters of complaint and has promised to look into the Sykes-Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel matter and others where an elder is abused and everyone runs to cover up by persecuting and proseucting HONEST family members and the attorneys that are outraged (myself and Ken).

Eventually Truth and Justice will shed a mightly light onto these matters, and oppression of those who oppose severe and pervasive elder abuse in exchange for the gold will have no place to run and hide their ugly lies, crimes and horrific treatment of elders and their honest family members.

Keep it up Ken and Roseanne.  Keep up the pressure on the authorities to do their jobs and end elder abuse in the courts and Guardianship.

Top 10 Peaceful Protests from Time Magazine Online

Posted on by
Reply

http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1887394_1861256,00.html

Today is the day we need to pray and act for our seniors, deprived unjustly by courts run amok.  Where secret lists of attorneys and “professional” guardians abound–many of whom have dozens of perfectly valid citizen complaints against them in the improper and unjust handling of seniors–primarily forcing them into nursing homes when they don’t want to go there and drugging them so they don’t care (40% of psychotropic drugs are sold to nursing homes, the use of these drugs for those under 20 and over 60 are not FDA approved nor are they effective other than as an illegal chemical restraint).

Far too many mideast countries are oppressing free speech of LGTB’s who want and deserve human and civil rights, women who want equal rights. The US still has not passed the ERA.

It is injustices like these that allow evil and greed to flourish.

Please pray for comfort and healing, peace, love and blessings and Truth and Justice for the seniors and their families you know, and those being oppressed around the world.

The power of prayer is infinite.

It is the most powerful weapon we have on earth, greater than any war, greater than any weapon.

All we have to do is learn to use it effectively.

JoAnne

From Pam Barbarito–a probate victim’s story

Posted on by
1
From: Pam Barbarito <barbaritopam@yahoo.com>
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 7:44 AM
Subject: Postponed Reply, Question & Comments
Dear Ken,
I hope this email finds you well. I think by now you will
not remember me, but you were kind enough to promptly
response to an email I wrote to you in February.
It was regarding a tax matter and a “professional fiduciary” who
was wrongfully appointed by the Court as a successor trustee to
my special needs trust in another state, without my knowledge
and required consent.
First, I want to thank you so much for your response. I didn’t
get right back to you because frankly I became ensconced in reading
about you, your legal commentaries, etc. Your work in the area
of guardianship abuse is truly laudable. I only wish there were
more in your profession who would demonstrate a little more
courage and integrity and step up in the courtroom, and out in
public to expose and defend against these crimes. It’s really tough,
I know. I am singing to the choir, correct?
I also did not respond immediately because you told me you were
mandated to forward the email to Eric Holder I sent you regarding
Sandra L. Hill (the professional fiduciary) who requested the Court
order me to be the successor trustee to my special needs trust
and file the trust taxes, both of which I am not allowed to do. I
wanted to consider whether or not I felt it would advisable to add to
the list before you or I forwarded the email.
I don’t know if you went ahead and forwarded it, and now we have a
new attorney general.
In any event I believe that it is important to do for the following reason.
If you would be so kind a have a question to ask you afterwards.
Since I was forced into a unwarranted and brutal legal process in another
state than where I reside, I have been at jeapordy of losing my public medical
benefits three times.
Very recently DHS/Aging and Persons with Disabilities in Oregon began a
review of my case for continued eligibility. They sent out several requests
(to California) for my Trust records. Sandra L. Hill was the only one to respond
 and she only sent two documents. One of the documents was a court order
 she stated was the court order which terminated my Trust on October 19, 2012.
That was an a Court Order Sandra L. Hill filed  and subsequently Sandra L. Hill vacated
when she decided  she wanted to go back to court and ask the judge for $30K more for a “reserve.”
I have court documents signed and filed by her and her attorneys which describe the
October  19, 2012 Order as “erroneous,” “revoked,” “vacated,” and “invalid” over a dozen times.
The correct “court” order (in parenthesis because my trust did not require a court order) was December 17, 2012 and a filed “date of entry” of December 20, 2012.
The difference between the two orders is that were false allegations were deleted from the first Order and replaced with a mandate to pay $30K……which led to an arrest warrant being issued  on me….a 62 year special needs beneficiary!!
The false allegations began with her attorney blindsighting me with emails immediately
after I asked Sandra L. Hill to return an initial $3K she took out of my Trust funds very
shortly after “taking over.”
I don’t think I need to explain the reason she sent in the vacated Order.  The only reason
I discovered she did this is because two people from the agency agreed to work on my
case exclusiviely  and assured me they would keep me abreast of all communication/corresponsence
that came in from California, precisely for the reason I just illustrated to you.
Please understand the damaging implications if the documents (the other has implications too) had bypassed me and gone into the review process. My life has been consumed the past 3+years putting evidence together to disprove Sandra L. Hill, et al, very damaging false allegations.
I showed the agency the correct court order and evidence that all the allegations were false.
I have provided a link below. Am I correct that this is the law she violated by submitting
false, or intentionally misleading and/or deceptive, etc. information/documents
to a federal agency? If so, with what agency might you suggest to file the appropriate complaint?
My case is with an Oregon state agency, but of course they do the eligibility reviews
for federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
I cannot spend the rest of my life in fear of losing medical coverage and what
the next “trick” will be played on me by these predators. I have lost everything else and am
holding on to a thread.
One last thing Ken. Did you hear about the proposed legislation entitled “The Special Needs
Trust Fairness Act of 2015?” I left a phone message at the 800# given on the website of the
organization who wrote about it in an article. Two days later I received a call from the in house policy
manager on Capital Hill who wanted to hear my “story.” He thanked me for bringing to his
attention the nexus between a special needs beneficiary whose trustee has “sole discretion” over what is spent,which is “ownership” akin a ward under guardianship. However, this is the law covering “protected persons” which does not include special needs beneficiaries.
Those certified by the CGC (which includes professional trustees)are directed to follow NGA rules, regulations and code of ethics which address guardianships. The only nexus to special needs beneficiaries is by way of the definition of “consumer” which includes all fiduciary relationships. However, one would need to dig to find the connection.
The proposed legislation is described as an issue of equal rights under the law, which of course is the basis of the ADA. I mention this because I had been looking at filing an ADA claim, as I am protected under this law. The in-house policy manager agrees that being forced to straddle two states in an attempt to obtain due process, when jurisdiction has been effectively hijacked, is virtually impossible……especially with no resources.
Just in case you want to see what I am referring to, I attached the vacated October 19, 2012 Court Order for termination of my special needs trust and the subsequent December 17, 2012 Court Order which was the legitimate Order. I also attached the false allegations from emails and a Declaration from Sharon Isenhour, Sandra L. Hill’s first attorney, which began right after I requested that Sandra L. Hill return my money. You can see her attempts to intimidate me.
 I also included an email I received by Sandra L. Hill’s second attorney, James Fararr, just days before Xmas, reminding me what would happen to me if I didn’t turn over the money. Sandra L. Hill sent a similar one too.
I was terrified, I admit it. I started my own appeal, but could not continue due to lack of money,legal counsel and procedural knowledge. I think one of the reasons she intentionally did not send the correct Court Order to DHS is because she didn’t want anyone to ask about the issue of the $30K which is included in that Order, because of her involvement in the issuance of the bench warrant for my arrest which was directly connected with that money.
Below is a list I am going to include in my report to the IRS because they worked in a cooperative effort regarding the Trust tax issue.
Sandra L. Hill, California professional fiduciary
Attorney John Christerson
Attorney Sharon Isenhour
Attorney James Fararr
Judge Rebecca Connolly (issued the Order to be successor trustee and file Trust taxes)
Thank you very much for your time, consideration, and any/all comments you would like to make. I sincerely appreciate it.
I keep up with your comments when they show up in JanetPhelan’s email threads.
I also think about you when I need to feel inspired and hopeful that there are people in positions who could effectuate the changes which are so desperately needed and actually make the  effort to do so.
I do hope you are OK given the terrible actions taken against you by the very individuals who should have praised and honored you for your good work and deeds. It was a reprehensible demonstration of cowardice and total lack of integrity!
All my Best,
Pam Barbarito

From Ken Ditkowsky–the IRS must NOT use politics to decide prosecutions

Posted on by
1

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 20, 2015 8:23 AM
To: ISBA Main Discussion Group , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , Matt Senator Kirk , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , BILL DITKOWSKY , Chicago FBI , Bev Cooper , Chicago Tribune , “FBI- ( (” , SUNTIMES , fox news network llc , Illinois ARDC , Illinois State Bar Association
Subject: Fw: loss of liberty is our future unless we are pro-active in our efforts to preserve it.

It is time to stop talking and doing a little fixing.
The assaults on the First Amendment by Mr. Jerome Larkin and the IARDC are not only reprehensible but are intellectually dishonest to the extent that they present a clear and present danger to our society.
An HONEST investigation is required even if the concept stimulates the ire of the Illinois judiciary, the Supreme Court of Illinois, and the IARDC.   (yes, I know that I got a four year suspension of my law license for proposing the same – but the First Amendment protects my liberty to continue to be proactive in demanding the same!)
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To: JoAnne M. Denison <joanne@justice4every1.com>; Probate Sharks <verenusl@gmail.com>; Tim NASGA <timlahrman@aol.com>; Nasga Us <nasga.org@gmail.com>; Matt Senator Kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>; J. Ditkowsky <jdit@aol.com>; Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>; FBI- ( ( <civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>; Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>; BILL DITKOWSKY <drditkowsky@aol.com>; Bev Cooper <bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com>; Chicago Tribune <tips@tribune.com>; Janet Phelan <janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com>; SUNTIMES <letters@suntimes.com>; fox news network llc <foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com>; Diane Nash <sa3456@msn.com>; Ginny Johnson <ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com>; Fiduciary Watch <fiduciarywatch@gmail.com>; ISBA Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>; Y. ACLU <aclu@aclu.org>; Edward Carter <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>; Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>; Barbara Stone <bstone12@hotmail.com>; RosANNa Miller <prov2828@hotmail.com>; Candice Schwager <schwagerlawfirm@live.com>; Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC <loamu@aol.com>; Illinois ARDC <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>; “newseditors@wsj.com” <newseditors@wsj.com>; “tips@cbschicago.com” <tips@cbschicago.com>; Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik <zamirkatan@aol.com>; Cook Sheriff <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>; Cook County States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>; Jay Goldman <jnjgldmn@aol.com>; Tom Fields <tvfields@oh.rr.com>; Eric Blair <activistpost@gmail.com>; ABAJournal.com <webmaster@abajournal.com>; Nancy Vallone <nvallone1@gmail.com>; Len Holland <consult4lj@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 7:52 AM
Subject: loss of liberty is our future unless we are pro-active in our efforts to preserve it.
Sneaks and miscreants abound!   The unethical and amoral actions of Jerome Larkin and the corrupt judicial and political figures is a cancer that is stripping us of our liberty.   If you come into conflict with an agenda that conflicts with the criminal element of our government the ‘cancer’ is now acting to silence you.
When the league of Woman Voters pointed out that democracy was not a spectator sport they were not whistling Dixie!    Today’s Wall Street Journal has the following article (opinion), to wit:
June 19, 2015 7:28 p.m. ET

71 COMMENTS
The story of IRS targeting of conservative groups that disagreed with ObamaAdministration policy isn’t over. On Friday the IRS lost another big battle, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a viewpoint discrimination lawsuit against the agency can proceed. Next stop, discovery.
The lawsuit began when the Pennsylvania-based pro-Israel group Z Street applied for tax-exempt status in 2009. When Z Street called to inquire about its application, it says an IRS agent said the agency had a policy that required Israel-related applications to get extra scrutiny in a special unit in Washington. Z Street sued in federal court but the IRS claimed the Anti-Injunction Act prevents suits meant to evade the collection of taxes and because the IRS was protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The IRS lost in district court but appealed.
Last month we told you about the oral argument at the D.C. Circuit when appellate judgesMerrick Garland, David Tatel and David Sentelle were appalled by the IRS argument. Is the agency’s position really that “the IRS is free to discriminate on the basis of viewpoint, religion, race [for 270 days]?” Judge Garland asked, “You don’t actually think that?” The court’s decision on Friday echoed those sentiments.
The IRS now has seven days to appeal (Z Street v. Koskinen) to the full circuit court. The agency has been using every tool to delay the lawsuit to get through the last days of the Obama Administration. But if this long-shot fails, Z Street may soon be able to begin discovery, and Z Street says it will seek every document and communication within the IRS as well as between the IRS and other parts of the government germane to its lawsuit or to the special policy regarding pro-Israel groups.
We already know from the IRS’s Be On the Lookout lists that the agency was flagging groups having to do with “occupied territory advocacy.” Soon we may see what else no good the agency was up to.
Now take a look at the ‘elder cleansing’ scandal!     Clout heavy health care criminals are finding that the honest health care customers are upset by the political rhetoric and hypocrisy and here and there voices are raised demanding HONEST investigations.      The idea of an honest investigation is so appalling to the miscreants judicial and political figures that they have garnered their forces to thwart even the mention of it.    Witness the JoAnne Denison disciplinary proceeding!     Attorneys from the Attorney Disciplinary Commission appealed to the Supreme Court of Illinois that the mention of an HONEST investigation was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theatre.  (read the Petition – you cannot make this stuff up!).     The Supreme Court of Illinois agreed!    

Those who do not remember their history are doomed to relive it.     In the 1920’s a group of funny little men in Russia and in the 1930’s an even less attractive man engaged in the same scenario that is now occurring in the United States.    This time OUR LIBERTY is a stake =    

Ken Ditkowsky

Loretta Lynch is apparently doing her job==taking down health care fraud

Posted on by
2

MaryGSykes.com

and I’m sure it’s only a matter of time before she gets to the nursing homes and the probate courts.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015/june/health-care-fraud-takedown/health-care-fraud-takedown

In fiscal year 2014, there was $3.3 billion in health care fraud in the US.  That’s right.  Not a typo.  $3.3 billion in bogus services and unwanted procedures.  Taken by white collar criminals including hundreds of doctors and licensed medical professionals.

When fraud is eliminated from health care, that means the US can have free health care for all.

The coverups and hiding of the dirt is not far away.

At least one govt official is doing her job.  I’m not sure she would be pleased with the corruption going on in our nation’s probate courts–the string of felonies–Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Bedin, Drabik, Richards– in Illinois, Helen Stone in Florida, Gayle Robinson in Michigan.

These seniors deserve Truth and Justice, even if posthumously

joanne

View original post

Loretta Lynch is apparently doing her job==taking down health care fraud

Posted on by
1

and I’m sure it’s only a matter of time before she gets to the nursing homes and the probate courts.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015/june/health-care-fraud-takedown/health-care-fraud-takedown

In fiscal year 2014, there was $3.3 billion in health care fraud in the US.  That’s right.  Not a typo.  $3.3 billion in bogus services and unwanted procedures.  Taken by white collar criminals including hundreds of doctors and licensed medical professionals.

When fraud is eliminated from health care, that means the US can have free health care for all.

The coverups and hiding of the dirt is not far away.

At least one govt official is doing her job.  I’m not sure she would be pleased with the corruption going on in our nation’s probate courts–the string of felonies–Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Bedin, Drabik, Richards– in Illinois, Helen Stone in Florida, Gayle Robinson in Michigan.

These seniors deserve Truth and Justice, even if posthumously

joanne

A Desparate Please from an Elderly Woman in Detroit–Let me go home in peace! MIchigan reaches a new low in the treatment of Senior Citizens

Posted on by
1

As if what is going on in Illinois with Jerome Larkin and the ARDC is not enough–covering up for court appointed Probate Attorneys Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmeidel and Adam Stern, we find another coverup going on in our sister State of Michigan, with Atty Mary Rowan.

http://voiceofdetroit.net/2014/10/23/serial-kidnapper-atty-mary-rowan-takes-second-adult-ward-from-home-without-court-order

This family is seeking funding for a COMPETENT HONEST attorney in Detroit Michigan to protect their beloved Grandmother from the evils of probate.

The woman is currently safe in California with her brother and will deal with the probate court from there, but apparently for doing so, they terminated her brother as co-guardian!  Why?  She escaped to California so she did not have to be in a locked down nursing home where she will never see the light of day again.

Please pray for her and donate to her “GoFundMe”.  Any amount will help this family.

http://www.gofundme.com/ttpa5c

WARNING:  This video is about the sickest I have seen on the violation of the civl and human rights and liberties of a grandmother!  You will be completely shocked that this can happen in this day and age with the US Constitution firmly in place for over 225 years. The woman is clearly competent and even smarter than the (idiot) alleged detective and evil Attorney Mary Rowan who is trying desperately to have her guardianized to have another Grandma head in her trophy case and guardian fees stolen and firmly under her belt.

I am also told that NASGA wouldn’t help Randy without a $15 donation. Come on now, all they have to do is ask me for it.  I am broke and struggling every day but I CAN FIND $15 TO HELP THIS FAMILY find justice.  Please have NASGA put up a GOFUNDME orwhatever to donate to help these probate victims ASAP.  Or have them email me.  I will supple the measly $15.  Are they kidding?

Randy Robinson is under a body attachment order, just like Atty Barbara Stone who must have that stamped on her forehead and a tatoo of an ankle bracklet.  And old idiotic tactic of corrupt courts and court connected attorneys merely designed to humilitate, intimidate and remove US Constitutional Proctions from vulnerable family members of targeted competent seniors.

Watch the video and see how the “alleged ward” is clearly smarter than her captors, knows her US Constitutional rights and fights them off at every turn.  The video is purely disgusting.  Michigan should be ashamed of itself and apologize to the other 49 states and 7 US territories for this indignity against an elderly woman and being the idiot of the states today on the internet.

We are looking for probate victims in Michigan who can help this very good son with a lawyer who will take care of him pro bono or low cost and get the guardianship dismissed and return approximately $50,000 in transfers to other family members.  He needs a safe place to be at this time, and perhaps another job.  He currently works as a pizza delivery guy, so I would hope there is a better job out there for him.

Since Mary Rowan is allegedly “guardian” to 200+ wards, I fully expect that some civil rights class action firm should take on this issue soon and get rid of this evil cabal of thieves, goons and creeps running amok in Detroit.

Randy’s videos will soon be up on Veimeo where they cannot be taken down but with a court order. The court wanted to do that, but the judge resisted, but not very strongly.  I also advised Randy to blog on WordPress, which is an UK company where US court have no real jurisdiction.  We may have fought King George in the Civil War, but WordPress is returning the favor right now.

JoAnne

What Jerome Larkin, Head of the Illinois ARDC supports–from Ken Ditkowsky

Posted on by
Reply

MaryGSykes.com

It occurred to me that Mr. Jerome Larkin and the Attorneys who have engaged or who have acted in concert with the Assault on Alice Gore’s civil and human rights are still practicing law.    Thus, pursuant to Rule 8.3 after reading the posting on NASGA I am forwarding that posting and the following as a complaint against Jerome Larkin for his part in the Conspiracy and as a complaint against all the attorneys who have acted in concert.    
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and 18 USCA 242 and 241 I am forwarding this e mail to the justice department for examination as to whether or not a specific prosecution should occur for the felonies committed and also so that we can assist in the prosecution of Seth Gilman and those allied with him.     
The facts as I understand them that related to the Alice Gore…

View original post 2,061 more words

What Jerome Larkin, Head of the Illinois ARDC supports–from Ken Ditkowsky

Posted on by
1
It occurred to me that Mr. Jerome Larkin and the Attorneys who have engaged or who have acted in concert with the Assault on Alice Gore’s civil and human rights are still practicing law.    Thus, pursuant to Rule 8.3 after reading the posting on NASGA I am forwarding that posting and the following as a complaint against Jerome Larkin for his part in the Conspiracy and as a complaint against all the attorneys who have acted in concert.    
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and 18 USCA 242 and 241 I am forwarding this e mail to the justice department for examination as to whether or not a specific prosecution should occur for the felonies committed and also so that we can assist in the prosecution of Seth Gilman and those allied with him.     
The facts as I understand them that related to the Alice Gore case are as follows:
Note: I copied the following so that there is no mystery as to the Alice Gore.   You can find this information on NASGA blog.   
Alice Gore Cook County Case No: 2006 P 000482   / Judge Lynne Kawamoto 
Alice Gore was living in an apartment building owned by Mr. Morris Esformes.  The apartment building was at Park Plaza, 6840 N. Sacramento, Chicago.  Alice was required to divulge her complete financial information when she moved into his facility.
Alice had previously chosen her daughter, Bev Cooper, to be her power of attorney (POA) for health care and financial issues. Bev, in accordance with Alice’s wishes, had promised her mother she wouldn’t place her in a nursing home, and would never make a decision to withhold medical treatment.   Bev visited her mom almost daily to help care for her mother’s needs .  [ Bev also wanted to take her mother home and care for her there, but she was denied to do so by the Probate Court and court appointed attorneys.]
Bev has a daughter, Kimberly Cooper, who was born with infantile Autism; she spent her childhood in and out of 54 foster homes; she had well-documented psychiatric illness, and was diagnosed as a child with Schizophrenia and Borderline-Personality Psychosis with Suicidal Ideations.  This condition was known by both the Lake County and Cook County courts.  During the guardianship proceedings, Bev had provided the Cook County Court with the documentation of Kimberly’s severe mental incapacity, but the court refused to enter it into the public record.   Additionally, Bev believes that Kimberly receives disability benefits from the government; this could have been easily ascertained by the court.
Karen Bowes was a business and family attorney for the Cooper family for 27 years.   She had represented Kimberly Cooper in the juvenile court of Lake County and was well aware of the psychiatric issues and legal issues that Kimberly Cooper endured during childhood.
After Bev’s mother, Alice Gore, had moved into the Esformes building and divulged her financial records, Karen Bowes approached Bev.  Karen told Bev that she should go to court to seek guardianship of her mother, rather than relying on her Power of Attorney.     Comment – this is a common ploy so that the Court can obtain jurisdiction and the miscreants can isolate, abuse and exploit the designated victim.    Probate proceedings are for specialized usage – it is a like the carpenter – he uses his hammer for the specialized task of driving nails into wood.   He could us a plumber’s wrench for the same purpose – but each has its own usage.   The Power of Attorney (durable) met the needs of Ms. Gore, but not the corrupt jurists and judicial officials who wanted her 1.5 million dollars.
Ms. Bowes stated to Bev that “Guardianship trumps Power of Attorney”, which is the opposite of what is stated by Illinois law.  Illinois law states that if a power of attorney is in place, a guardian is not required. [Illinois law also says that a POA trumps guardianship, even if one is appointed, and no judge seems to follow that on the 18th floor, hence the need for a federal monitor there and our recent call for federal monitoring of the 18th floor by someone willing to conduct HONEST and THOROUGH investigations and remove judges and attorneys that will simply not follow the law because they themselves are motiviated by kickbacks, power and greed.  Perhaps at one time this was true, a litigant did not have to come to court, but now it is code for “you better be there, or else they will fleece you and your next of kin].
Bev followed the advice of her long-time attorney.  Bev went to court to change her Power of Attorney to Plenary Guardian.
On January 20, 2006:  petition for guardianship was entered.
Karen Bowes sent an attorney named Miriam Solo to Alice Gore’s apartment.  Miriam Solo is a cousin of Morris Esformes, the apartment building owner who required that Alice divulge her complete financial information when she moved into his building. 
Miriam Solo interviewed Alice; Solo did not allow Alice’s daughter, Bev, to participate in the discussion, and closed the door so Bev could not hear the interview.  Karen Bowes told Bev that she did not really know Solo prior to these proceedings, and instructed Bev to pay Solo $500.00 for her attorney services. Bev was also instructed by Bowes that she didn’t need to attend court hearings.   [This is what is always said by corrupt judges and attorneys who want to function with impunity out of the critical eye of the public and those that know better.  Always be wary when either the Judge or the Attorney says “you don’t have to come.”  Often, that is a lie.  The public is always welcome to attend court hearings, status calls and trials to ensure that tax payer money is hard at work and Truth and Justice are being served.] 
On January 24, 2006:  Miriam Solo was appointed by Judge Lynne Kawamoto to serve as Guardian ad Litem on the case.
Karen Bowes apparently facilitated the appointment of Miriam Solo as GAL, telling Bev that Miriam Solo was just to be an attorney on the case.  It later became apparent to Bev that Bowes and Solo had a business relationship during the preceding ten years, despite Bowes having told Bev that she didn’t really know Miriam Solo.
Most, if not all, of Alice Gore’s financial records disappeared from her apartment building during this time frame.   Additionally, Karen Bowes elicited the legal help of Bruce Lange, an attorney/accountant who works for Harris Bank and Trust.  Lange and Bowes instructed Bev to make repeated trips to Alice Gore’s bank to secure Alice’s bank statements for them so they could determine Alice’s net worth.  Despite the fact that Lange was paid for his services as an attorney, he never supplied the court with the financial information that he and Bowes had obtained from Bev.
On February 27, 2006: Kimberly Cooper, granddaughter was appointed as guardian of the person and estate for Alice Gore.
Bev Cooper’s Power of Attorney was revoked.
The court is aware Kimberly Cooper has a history of psychiatric illness.
Subsequent to her appointment, Kimberly told her mother, Bev, that she intended to place Alice into Hospice, a decision that Alice had many times told Bev she did want not enacted.  Alice’s primary diagnosis was arthritis, and she had no qualifying medical diagnoses to support a DNR/Hospice order.
 NB:  Comment.    The Seth Gillman indictment indicates that large kickbacks are available for referrals of people being elder cleansed into nursing home, hospice etc.   The fraud opportunities abound! [Seth Gillman’s indictment has been published on Pacer and elsewhere on this blog and you can search for it.  It contains over 100 affidavits of elders that did not want or need hospice, but GPI  or General In Patient care paid $167 per day from Medicare while Hospice paid many times that or $670 per day, so all seniors according to Seth Gillman, an attorney, needed hospice.  You will note that while the ARDC have come after Ken and I for blogging about corruption, Seth Gillman bilks the taxpayer and kills seniors for over $100 million and the ARDC leaves him alone]
Other medical decisions made by Kimberly were of concern to Bev, including the removal of the Alice’s gold teeth.  Additionally, Kimberly authorized the placement of a feeding G-tube, while the patient still had the ability to eat and drink without difficulty.
Alice Gore, the ward, was removed from Esformes’ apartment building to the Carlton on the Lake Rehabilitation Center at 725 W. Montrose in Chicago.
Alice Gore was moved into a nursing home with which Esformes had ties, Lakeview Nursing Rehab, at 735 W. Diversey Pkwy, Chicago, IL.  Michael Elkes was administrator at Lakeview Nursing Rehab at that time.
Alice Gore’s health declined in this facility.  When Bev requested an accurate weight on her mother, Michael Elkes contacted Miriam Solo.
Attempts by Bev to bring her concerns about her mother’s declining condition to the judge resulted in her being restricted from visiting her mother without supervision for a number of years.   
Rehab Assist, which is owned by Tom Kleinheinz, was assigned to supervise Bev when she visited her mother.  False statements were made by Rehab Assist to the judge about Bev’s interactions with her mother, resulting in further visitation restrictions.  Thomas Kleinheinz, owner of Rehab Assist, and his employees, Melody (last name unknown) and Ben Topp were all participants in these actions.
Rehab Assist is believed to have ties with Mr. Esformes.
Miriam Solo brought in other care management companies and personnel as well, including Kindred Guardian, a case manager Annette Jungheim, and Signe Gleeson, from Elder Care Solutions.  False documentation was also entered into the court record by these individuals.
Alice was subsequently moved into Warren Barr Pavilion Nursing home (a nursing home that was recently purchased by Esformes from the Masonic owners) at 66 W. Oak Street in Chicago, where she remained until she passed away.
Feb. 25, 2011 Alice Gored died.
Since the appointment of Kimberly Cooper as guardian, an estate worth over $1,500,000.00 (one million five hundred dollars) has been depleted.
Missing annuity checks, and an inventory and accounting has not been provided to the court, despite requests by Bev Cooper
Two annuity checks were sent to Bev Cooper by the issuing annuity company and were endorsed by Kimberly Cooper. The signatures were both different and appeared to be forged. The suspected forgery was reported to the GAL and yet nothing was done.
*******16 missing annuity checks that may have been stolen from Alice’s apartment.
There is an outstanding issue related to an annuity/life insurance policy. Alice had purchased a paid up annuity that gave her about $1600.00 or so income per month that paid her benefits from the capital and interest of the annuity until she was about 95 years old…after that the annuity continued to pay at the expense of the annuity company.
Part of the annuity package was a paid up insurance policy for about $150,000 payable to either Alice or Kimberly upon Alice’s death (beneficiary uncertain).  Alice owned the annuity and the insurance policy and in any case no matter who was the beneficiary, the policy should have been listed as an asset of the estate. The court mentioned the policy on record and they are evading listing the asset to the estate.
It should also be noted that Morris.Esformes has been under investigation by Lisa Madigan’s office in the past for allegedly placing homeless people into his public aid nursing homes; these placements were done without proper criminal investigations prior to the placement. Esformes was also being investigated by the federal investigators for improprieties in other states.  Bev Cooper has also reported Miriam Solo and her siblings to the State of Florida and the FBI for an alleged fraud committed on the estate of a Mr. Faskowitz, a resident in Florida. 
Alice Gore died alone on Feb. 25, 2011: The cause of death was dehydration, despite the presence of a feeding tube which was not used, as the patient had been able to eat orally.  Questions remain over why the patient was not adequately hydrated prior to her death.  
*********   Bev Cooper was not notified of the change in her mother’s condition, and was not able to be with her mother when she passed away.
(JMD comments in Brick Red because apparently our elected officials do nothing about this pervasive corruption, having bricks for brains.)
It is noteworthy that SOME European nations  have populaces that rate their happiness as very high.  Why?  They have free health care, free day care, free college (and many go), 3 weeks of mandatory vacation and a minimum wage of $20 per hour.  Are they smarter than us?  Better than us?  No.  They just rid themselves of war and health care corruption!  At a massive rate of health care corruption–doctors and hospitals taking money and performing no services or services on elderly and other patients not needing the services, plus the government waste in the military–millions spent on nothing for nobody, apparently free health care, free day care, free college and a minimum wage of $20 per hour is attainable (Denmark, with horrible long winters and cold weather is apparently one of the happiest places to live in the world).
It is utterly shameful that Gloria saw her mother only a handful of times in 5 years!  The Guardian and the court forbade it.  At one point, a 3 page order was drafted up (elsewhere on this site) with incredible details on how to prevent Gloria from seeing her mother?  Why?  Mary was just as competent in June of 2014 as she was in her viedoe on Veimo in a red snuggy speaking of highly intelligent philosophies with excellent cognitive skills.  But they guardianized her anyway, because she received no Service of Summons and Petition–CT dragged her to DuPage and kept her there, against her will.  Then her safe deposit box was not inventoried, but emptied by CT without any court order of hundred of thosands of dollars in valuable coins.  To this date, the court appointed attorneys Farenga, Stern and Schmeidel block all discovery and get the ARDC attorneys to do their dirty work of threatening HONEST attorneyss to stay away from the case — or else.
Gloria is devastated, having only seen her mother for one hour before she died, lying in a coma.  Then she was discourtesly told her time was up and to leave.  No funeral, no obituary for Mary.  And definitely not an autopsy that would show the brain was fine, but the system filled with deadly opiates.
The court appointed attorneys and judges know what to do. Mary’s hundreds of thousands in valuable coins disappear with no discovery, tho Gloria repeatedly asked for it.  The $1 million dollar home is on a valuable piece of land where millions can be made. That is appriased in one month for $750k and sold in a couple of months for $210k.
Are any of the attorneys brought onto the carpet by JL and disciplined?
Nope.  It is all a cover up.
But you can’t cover up a dedicated blogger.
That’s why this blog is now officially the MOST DANGEROUS BLOG IN ILLINOIS.
It threatens the entire 18th floor and it is relentless and unstoppable.
Questions will be asked.  Pleadings will be filed with the Illinois Supreme Court.  The entire 18th Floor of the Daley center, as well as numerous courts in Illinois operate as nothing but fraud on the court.  And Fraud on the Court has no limitations period.  It can be brought up at any time, over and over, just waiting for ONE honest judge or Justice to step in and kick butt.
Now the kick butt opportunity is up, once again, at the Illinois Supreme Court.
And I pledge to keep it up there until someone does something about fleecing and murdering our precious grandparents in Illinois.
JoAnne

A video of just another grandma that doesn’t want to be in a nursing home

Posted on by
2

Obviously blocked by a probate court and a daughter that just doesn’t care.

https://video-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xaf1/v/t42.1790-2/10870941_10205762457367000_38266572_n.mp4?oh=0f3bffeb8e88141e7b78fe0262b7bef7&oe=55831FE3

And more stories of guardianship abuse:

https://video-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xaf1/v/t42.1790-2/10870941_10205762457367000_38266572_n.mp4?oh=0f3bffeb8e88141e7b78fe0262b7bef7&oe=55831FE3

Why are these “guardians” involved draining estates when these ladies seem perfectly fine?

Vote for Denison & Assocs, PC for a Chase Mainstreet Grant

Posted on by
2

MaryGSykes.com

Chase is providing $100,000 grants to businesses that help the community the most.

Please go to https://www.missionmainstreetgrants.com/vote/businesses

and type in 60714 (our zip code) or Denison and vote for us.

We have helped so very many clients from the clutches of the probate court and this website is dedicated to stopping corruption in Chicago.

Due to this website and the works of others, Judge Kowamoto is gone (pulled 99 year old Alice Gore’s 29 gold teeth and inserted a feeding tube against her will, died emaciated and dehydrated when money ran out), Judge Stuart is gone for lying at my ARDC trial, or changing her testimony that she never chained Gloria in her ante room demanding bank account information to pay attorneys fees and threatened to euthanize her two pets Shaggy and Kitty–and we have done so much more for clients.

Dominic Spera was rendered homeless on the streets of…

View original post 301 more words

Vote for Denison & Assocs, PC for a Chase Mainstreet Grant

Posted on by
1

Chase is providing $100,000 grants to businesses that help the community the most.

Please go to https://www.missionmainstreetgrants.com/vote/businesses

and type in 60714 (our zip code) or Denison and vote for us.

We have helped so very many clients from the clutches of the probate court and this website is dedicated to stopping corruption in Chicago.

Due to this website and the works of others, Judge Kowamoto is gone (pulled 99 year old Alice Gore’s 29 gold teeth and inserted a feeding tube against her will, died emaciated and dehydrated when money ran out), Judge Stuart is gone for lying at my ARDC trial, or changing her testimony that she never chained Gloria in her ante room demanding bank account information to pay attorneys fees and threatened to euthanize her two pets Shaggy and Kitty–and we have done so much more for clients.

Dominic Spera was rendered homeless on the streets of Rockford when he had his own retirement account and bank accounts were held jointly with his mother–the GAL locked him out of all of that rendering him homeless.

We fought to keep Carol Wyman at home with John and we’d like to litigate his suit against the miscreants who kept her in a locked down nursing home against her will where she was beaten and sexually abused in one of the worst nursing homes in Illinois.

These are only a representative sampling of the cases we handle.  (No, it’s not just me doing this work, there are plenty of others that help me–NASGA, Probate Sharks, etc. and other attorneys)

Anyone who comes to us, I promise we will not turn you away.  We will find you an attorney, I will write pleadings for free for the attorney.  We will continue to train and support low cost and pro bono attorneys in probate so that that there will be no more probate victims.

I am not dead.  I come to work every day for 18 hours per day and work on corruption in probate and patents.

That is all I do now.  I don’t have direct client contact, I just do intake, pass of the clients to other activist attorneys, train them, support them and I make sure that the 18th floor of the Daley center is told to follow the law, stop selling seniors and disableds for cash, and stop terrorizing the families with isolation orders, gag orders, psychotropic drugs for seniors–you name it, they’re doing it and it has to stop.

This blog and the public demands it.

So please help us out–myself and unnamed attorneys (I can’t name them because the ARDC will go after them too) and my staff of Gabby, Matt and Nick.

thanks for listening.

JoAnne

Filings today on the Quest for Truth and Justice in the Court System

Posted on by
3

In response to the Citation by the ND of Illinois to suspend me there, filed courtesy of miscreant Sharon Opryszek:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwcE5kdXZpWktKZXc&authuser=0

Also included:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwS091SjhKeVdJMlk&authuser=0

And a separate Motion demanding additional relief from the Illinois Supreme court:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwWnQ4TDUzSXJOVVE&authuser=0

Exhibit C, which details the continuing assault of the ARDC on the First Amendment of the US constitution.  Note how they never, ever cite case law properly.  The rules of Case Citation, as found in the Harvard Blue Book, or the Standford Red Book requires that attorneys, except in highly unusual circumstances, must only cite to Appellate decisions.  They are not to cite to trial court decisions (which are almost never published) because a trial court is too close to the matters at hand and are only supposed to focus on trial court issues and not act as a reviewing court.

That never stops the ARDC.  They prefer to cite to their own decisions (pretty much like being part of circle jerk), and do not like to cite to Appellate decisions on First Amendment rights because then they also have to cite “dicta” which is also not permitted.

Dicta is the stuff mentioned at a passing glance and is not part of the holding of the case, and the cases an attorney cites are supposed to go their way.

None of the major Supreme Court Decisions or Illinois Supreme Court decisions go their way.  Far from it.  Citizens United (the part that speaks about the First Amendment, not that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as citizens do to skew elections unfairly), Alvarez, Sawyer, etc. and now we have Enois where the Supreme Court said that mens rea and scienter or a criminal mind is required to find someone guilty of threats by posting on social media.

The interesting part of the Review Board decision is that they do not state which statements in fact are false. They also claim that a blog told Gloria to file certain pleadings and blog down her mother’s guardianship case, which is ridiculous.  I was never her attorney at the time, she had her own attorneys and her own paralegals and I was never part of that team.  But the ARDC would never know because they quashed all my witnesses!  Then one witness, Judge Stuart, lied or changed her testimony on the stand and the Review Board said nothing about that.  They did not care the trial was grossly unfair and completely tained and devoid of any relevant applicable case law.

It’s a sad day when the ARDC continually mis cites and misleads caselaw in the oral argument part of their brief and cannot find any cases on their side.

Then they run trials with no meaningful discovery, strike all opposing witnesses and then just come to the conclusion of violation of the rules of ethics when they themselves have engaged in underhanded and deceptive means and trickery ten times over to get the verdict they were told to get.

The next document is a Motion to Reconsider my Interim Suspension which was filed today and which asks for the following relief:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwT3dWcmJTZnhxQ28&authuser=0

1) call for a federal monitor to take valid citizen complaints on the 18th floor.  this would bypass the ARDC process where citizens file complaints and then tied in and corruption probate attorneys file motions for sanctions which are rubber stamped by their friendly judges;

2) that I be allowed to represent pro bono clients, or that the ARDC/Illinois Supreme Court find low cost or free counsel for my clients

3) that my charity be funded with 2 to 3 attorneys to provided low cost or pro bono service in the probate courts of Illinois

4) that I be declared a Protected Whistleblower by the Illinois Supreme Court to protect my work and my blog

Jerome Larkin has $1.2 million in mortgage payoffs.  Melissa Smart has a free condo.  No one investigates that and removes them.

The payoffs and payouts abound.  Esp at the ARDC and in the Probate court arena with Stern-Schmeidel and Farenga.

Ken Ditkowsky has plenty of time to write hundreds of emails and speak out.  The ARDC granted him that time.

And as for me, I will continue to fight for your rights, to demand the resignation of Jerome Larkin, Sharon Opryszek and other no-ethics attorneys who help other attorneys turn our court system into nothing more than a marketplace to wheel and deal seniors and disableds to the highest bidder.  All of that has to end.  The ARDC has to start filing ethics reports, the ARDC must start investigating attorneys on staff that live beyond their means and have questionable financials, and I don’t mean by just asking them, but by using discovery and subpoenas.

The ARDC has to step in and demand that citizens who file valid complaints cannot be sanctioned by clout heavy tied in attorneys in court trying to cover their tracks.  The ARDC should be protecting court room victims of corruption and yet it does not.

The public wants and demands it.

JoAnne

From HHS and Imediate Press Release — Chicago $2.5 million in medicare fraud!

Posted on by
1
This article was found by Ken Ditkowsky today and noted the huge sums in Medicare Fraud in Chicago.  The FBI is apparently working hard to breaking up these schemes–no matter where they are and where they reach.
Federal Funds are NOT to be taken from the Federal Govt to use for personal debts under the guise of Medicare Medical Services for Seniors. The schemes and scam about and those in concert with the activities, and those who aid, abet and support will be looking at an FBI investigator. This country simply cannot go to universal health care for all without rooting out the overt corruption.
From HHS recently:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 1, 2015
Health Care Provider Se
ntenced To 75 Months
For $2.5 Million Health Care Fraud
CHICAGO
―
A former owner and operator of SelectcareHealth, Inc., a provider of outpatient
physical and respiratory therapy located in Park Ridge and Skokie, was sentenced to federal prisonfor engaging in a $2.5 million health care fraud scheme.
Ankur Roy, 38, of Miami Beach, Florida,was sentenced last Friday to 75 months in prison followed by 3 years of supervision after his releaseby U.S. District Court Judge Gary Feinerman. Roy was also ordered to forfeit more than $2.5 million
in proceeds he and his codefendants gained by defrauding Medicare and Blue Cross Blue Shield ofIllinois. Roy was ordered to surrender to the Federal Bureau of Prisons on July 15, 2015. Roy wascharged in 2013 with two co-defendants who both pled guilty; Dipen Desai, who was sentenced to 27months’ imprisonment in December2014, and Akash Patel, who is scheduled to be sentenced inJuly. Roy was convicted of five counts of the indictment by a jury in July 2014.
Between March and May 2011, Roy and his co-defendants submitted false and fraudulent healthinsurance claim forms to Medicare and Blue Cross Blue Shield for respiratory therapy services thatthey knew were never provided to patients. Roy, who proposed the scheme to his co-defendants as ameans to extricate themselves from debt, design
ed the scheme to avoid raising red flags with Medicare and Blue Cross Blue Shield’s fraud detection systems. As a result of these false claims,Medicare and Blue Cross Blue Sh
ield paid defendants over $2.5 million. Defendant took over$600,000 of that sum and used it for his own personal purposes, includingfor personal expenses,paying off credit card bills
and repaying his student loan.
“Defendant Roy’s fraud deprived Medicare and Blue Cross Blue Shield of over $2.5 million, a substantial sum of money that should have gone to pay for medicalservices for senior citizens, andnot to line his and his partners’ pockets,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Maureen Merin argued at sentencing.
The sentence today was announced by Zachary T. Fardon, United States Attorney for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois, Robert J. Holley, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of InvestigationChicago; Lamont Pugh III, Special Agent in Chargeof the Chicago Regional Office of Health andHuman Services, Office of Inspector General; andJames Vanderberg, SpecialAgent-in-Charge of the U.S.Department of Labor Office of Inspector General in Chicago.
The government was represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maureen Merin

From Dr. Richard Cordero–Template to Use when arguing Corruption Article 1 of 4

Posted on by
2

Template to use when arguing before appellate judges on appeal charging a lower court judge with wrongdoing that caused injury in fact

Template

that Advocates of Honest Judiciaries can use

to argue the equivalent law in their respective jurisdiction,

rather than their emotions or notions of “ what’s not right ”,

when appearing before appellate judges on an appeal

charging a judge below with wrongdoing

that has caused a party injury in fact

.

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol: 244; 240.

This article may be published and distributed, provided it is

in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,

and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

.

By

.

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England

M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School

D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

.

Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net , CorderoRic@yahoo.com , Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com, RicCordero@verizon.net

.

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

.

Outline for Oral Argument

held by Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

before the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department,

of the New York State Supreme Court [a trial court]

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf > ol:244

.

.

  1. Introduction for pro ses intent on orally arguing their case rather than chanting its requiem

When you argue before an appellate panel of judges –normally three or five-, you are expected to argue reversible errors made by the judge below. Those errors are in principle errors of law. But even when you argue that a fact was treated in error by the judge, e.g., was give too much or too little weight, whether in the admission of evidence or in the instructions to the jury, the same principle applies:

.

On appeal, you are expected to cite other cases, rules, or laws that support your argument for affirmance or, what is more frequent, reversal of the decision appealed from . You cannot appeal a decision just because you do not like it. An appeal is not merely an opportunity for a party to tell a panel his or her side of the story. It is certainly ill-advised to alienate the panel with a rambling, teary account brimming with all sorts of irrelevant facts. If you do not want to be dismissed by the panel as yet another pro se who has no clue what he or she is doing, clearly identify the reversible error and then move on to provide the legal basis for assigning it as such.

.

Assuming that you are arguing for reversing the decision below, limit yourself to the two or three errors that you can show to be such with the strongest legal arguments. Only the judge’s reversible errors matter to the panel. There is an obvious reason for that: Not every error is reversible. If it is not, it does not provide ground for reversing the decision of the judge below.

.

Never take a ‘shotgun approach’ by citing every minute error. If you cite non-reversible errors, everything that you feel in your layman’s gut ‘wasn’t right’, never mind something done by somebody other than the judge, you only dilute the panel’s attention. When you rant or vent your anger about an incident for which you have no legal basis to argue that it is a reversible error, you only give the panel an excuse to brand your forehead with a lethal label: Pro Se. That turns your oral ‘argument’ into the inept storytelling of a legal death foretold: that of your appeal.

.

As it is, when you file in a federal court and check the “pro se” box of the case information form, it is as if you were marking it DOA: Dead on Arrival. In the Federal Judiciary, pro se cases are weighed as a third of a case while a capital punishment case is weighed as ten cases( * >jur:43¶81 ). In a capital case, there is already a corpse and a living person on his or her way to becoming one. It is because of the type of case and, thus, what is at stake, that it is so weighed.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

.

A pro se case is given a 30 times lighter weight than a capital case regardless of its nature and the stakes, and no matter whether the brief was written by joe schmock or actually by an anonymous lawyer. It is so weighed because you checked the “pro se” box.

.

Consequently, when judges see that a brief was written by a pro se, they give it the perfunctory attention that the official weighing of the case authorizes them to give it. It is a self-fulfilling weighing. Likewise, if at oral argument you start telling the sob story of your case, the judges will shut their ears and close their minds. You are talking to yourself while irritating the judges just as the shrill alarm of a fire drill does.

.

Therefore, if you are going to appear pro se, do your homework to learn what you have to do to perform like a lawyer. Lawyers went to graduate, law school for three years after the four years of college. Reasonably assume that they learned something that judges expect to see in their briefs and when they appear at oral argument.

.

Do not wing it! The casual writing on the back of a napkin is not the shorter version of a brief. Do not improvise yourself as a lawyer before judges. First, compose your brief by doing thorough legal research and writing, and rewriting, and revising, and reviewing, and checking and double-checking its content, grammar, and format. Practice your oral argument alone and before other people; otherwise, hire a lawyer or do not bother to file your brief or appear to orally argue it. Instead, use your effort, time, and money to give your case a decent burial in a Kleenex box and light candles for your way ahead without it. It was Dead on Arrival.

T o keep your appeal alive at oral argument, study the template below and adapt it to your case.

  1. Template for the outline to use at oral argument
  1. The judge below committed reversible error by:

.

  1. dismissing the motion in question without reading it, whereby he denied Plaintiff-Appellant (P) his due process right under the New York State and U.S. constitutions to be ‘heard’ through his writing; and

.

  1. pretending that the motion could only be served on Defendants (Ds) under one procedural provision although there are 14 available to do so, whereby he denied P equal protection of the law under those constitutions.

 

  1. Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR, similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which is the model for many state civil practice codes, even as to their rule numbering] §105(d): “ A “civil judicial proceeding” is a prosecution…of an independent application to a court for relief . ” P is applying in this court for relief from a grievance against conduct that the judge below adopted on his own given that Ds neither answered nor appeared, thus defaulting

.

  1. Summons and complaint( A:41,45 ) [ blue text references are to the record on appeal] mailed under CPLR §312-a, received 4oct12.

.

  1. Letter( A:60-64 ) of 31oct12 of Ds’ attorney to P acknowledged receipt and discussed claims:

.

  1. The key factor in service is whether the notice was ” reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections “, Court of Appeals (highest court in New York) in Ruffin v. Lion Corp. ( A-9 )

.

  1. CPLR §306(e): “ A writing admitting service by the person to be served is adequate proof of service ”; § 312-a(b) attorney can acknowledge receipt; Morrissey v. Sostar : “ The fact of service conferred jurisdiction. Once proper service was made, any deficiency in the affidavit did not take away jurisdiction which was obtained . ”( A:10 )

.

  1. Ds failed to answer P’s complaint and subsequentmotion for default and declaratory judgment( A:3 ) or appear to contest under CPLR 320 the summons issued by court to them.

.

  1. P paid the filing fee and acquired a contractual right to have the court enforce the notice appearing on its summons: “ Should you [D] fail to answer, a judgment will be entered against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint ”( A:41 ).

.

  1. No appearance at the 11mar13 hearing of the motion for default and declaratory judgment

.

  1. P was entitled to default judgment under CPLR 3215(a) Default. When a defendant has failed to appear [or] plead, the plaintiff may seek a default judgment against him.

.

.

  1. Judge denied P due process and equal protection of the law when he:

.

  1. refused to hear P at hearing: “ I don’t want to hear about it! You have to file an affidavit under 308”( A:269 )

.

a . Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge, Part 131 , Audio-visual Coverage of Judicial Proceedings, §131.1(a) “ These rules are promulgated to comport with the legislative finding that an enhanced public understanding of the judicial system is important in maintaining a high level of public confidence in the Judiciary ”.

.

1) One cannot understand the irrationality of a judge holding a hearing who does not want to hear the parties or of a court allowing that to happen without holding the judge liable for showing contempt of process .

.

  1. Part 100 Judicial Conduct (JC) 100.3(B)(6): “ A judge shall [not ‘may’, a duty, not a matter of discretion] accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding…the right to be heard according to law ”

.

  1. denied P the benefit of CPLR §312-a by prejudging 308 as the only applicable rule

.

a . ignored CPLR §312-a: “ As an alternative to the methods of personal service authorized by section…308 ”

.

b . disregarded CPLR §102: to apply the rules so that they are “ not inconsistent with the constitution, [or] act of the legislature. No rule …shall abridge or enlarge the substantive rights of any party ”

.

c . disregarded his duty under CPLR §104 to “ apply the rules liberally ” by limiting service to only one of the 14 CPLR service provisions

.

  1. disregarded CPLR §103: to give substance priority over form by ‘ not dismissing a proceeding not brought in the proper form, rather “the court shall make whatever order is required for its proper prosecution ”

.

  1. disregarded priority to be given under CPLR §2001 to parties’ rights rather than their deficiencies in procedural compliance or their papers: “ At any stage of an action, including the filing of a summons…the court may permit a mistake, omission, defect or irregularity…to be corrected, upon such terms as may be just, or, if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced [it] shall be disregarded .” E.g.:

.

1) CPLR §5520(c) Defects in form: Where a notice of appeal is premature or contains an inaccurate description of the judgment or order appealed from, the appellate court, in its discretion, when the interests of justice so demand, may treat such a notice as valid.

.

  1. closed his mind to contrary views, revealing a temperament unfit for judicial office

.

  1. denied( A:1a.iii ) without reading the motion for default and declaratory judgment
  2. said “ I will take a look at it ”( A:269 ), either misleading P if he had no intention to take any look at it or failing to keep his word

.

b . claimed without stating any reason that he was denying the motion due to P’s “ failure to submit proof of service in accordance with CPLR ”

.

1) failed to notice P’s Affidavit of Service( A:6 ) and its listing as the first item of the motion’s Table of Contents( A:3 )

.

2) disregarded CPLR §2101(f): “ A defect in the form of a paper, if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced [ Ds were served , A¶2 ], shall be disregarded by the court, and leave to correct shall be freely given ”

.

3) disregarded CPLR §3026, which concerns the substance of: “ Pleadings [, which] shall be liberally construed. Defects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced ”

.

  1. irresponsible and unprofessional for the judge to deny a motion without reading it in an unjustified rush to take it off his workload

.

1) did not give himself the material time necessary to read it( A:269 ) when scribbling his denial on a form while still on the bench and having it mailed to P the same day of the hearing

.

  1. denial of P’s constitutional due process right to opportunity to be heard in defense of his view on service under CPLR §312-a rather than 308

.

  1. disregarded P’s CPLR §105(d) “application for relief ” in the declaratory judgment branch of the motion for default and declaratory judgment( A:3 )

.

a . did not even mention it in his denial, though that branch was in the motion’s title( A:1c ) and the Relief Requested( A:32 )

.

b . disregarded CPLR §3001: “ If the court declines to render such a declaratory judgment it shall state its grounds ”

.

  1. breached the contract for judicial adjudicative services in exchange for which P had paid court fees as consideration for forming a contract for adjudicative services

.

1) the Administrative Judge for Civil Matters of the Supreme Court, Kings County, states in the opening statement of the Court’s official website, http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/2jd/kings/Civil/index.shtml : “ It is our intention to provide quality service to attorneys and all litigants, whether or not you are represented by counsel ”.

.

  1. discriminated against P for being pro se

.

a . but had heard at length two couple of parties on hearing morning

.

b . disregarded JC 100.3(B)(4) to “ not, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice ” when he asked P whether he was pro se( A:269 )

.

  1. disregarded the Standards of Civility, Judges’ Duties To Parties: “ 1. A judge should be patient, courteous and civil to lawyers, parties and witnesses ”, putting an end to the hearing in less than two minutes

.

  1. denied benefit of diligence duty, taking 5 months to deny reargue motion

.

  1. disregarded duty under CPLR §104 “ to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every civil judicial proceeding ”

.

  1. disregarded JC 100.3(A): “ judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s other activities ”; and 100.3(B)(7): “ A judge shall dispose of all judicial matters promptly, efficiently and fairly . ”

.

  1. denied( A:1b.iii ) reargue motion( A:121,124 ) without allowing P oral argument

.

  1. in 5 months did not find 10 minutes to talk to P

.

b . pattern of not hearing party to evade challenge to his preconceptions

.

  1. disposed of P’s motion to reargue with:

.

  1. reasonless, conclusory, lazy statement: It “ is without merit ”( A:1b.iv )

.

  1. quoted Ds’ attorney, “ Nobody considers himself or herself served ”

.

1) being served is not D’s subjective state of mind, but the legal consequence of objective act of delivering summons according to any service provision of CPLR, including §312-a, used by P

.

2) disregarded his JC 100.3(B)(1) duty to “ be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it ”

.

3) showed gross incompetence because he ignored the law

.

4) was too arrogant to admit that he had made a mistake

.

  1. knew he could treat P’s motions perfunctorily because it means nothing in practical terms if this court merely reverses him, given that ‘due to their relationship’ (next) it will not hold him accountable and liable to anybody

.

.

  1. Court’s duty under JC 100.1 “ to uphold the integrity of the judiciary and its independence…from undue influence of relationships ” to their peers, and, 100.3(B)(1), “ shall not be swayed by…fear of criticism ” of them, but, 100.3, “ shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently ”, not being partial to their views, but open to those of others

.

  1. The law lacks the power to bend judges’ minds to its rules or guide them to justice.

.

  1. Judges are bent on going to Court of Appeals or Federal Judiciary and guided by the fearsome cry of mutually interdependent survival: ‘If you bring me down, I’ll take you with me! ’

.

  1. Newsday’s investigation of judges in Suffolk richly rewarding supporters, by Editor D. Henley and Reporters S. Peddie and Will Van Sant; 4oct14; http://data.newsday.com/projects/long-island/melius-receivership/ ; audited thousands of judicial documents; Chief Administrative Judge opened an investigation

.

  1. Court should hold judge liable to P for injury in fact, e.g., prolonged penury due to D’ breach of contract, fees, caused him since 11mar13

.

  1. apply to him: ‘ a person intends the reasonable consequences of his acts ’

.

  1. just as Newsday did, Court should audit judge’s decisions( A:309 ; 314¶122g3 ) to determine pattern of disregard of judicial and contractual duties by being irresponsible, incompetent, and unprofessional

.

  1. hold public hearings to hear parties, lawyers, clerks, and judges on whether judge has failed “ to avoid even the appearance of impropriety ”, JC 100.2

.

  1. do audit/hearings and make history just as Supreme Court ordered bussing in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 because ‘ separate education is an inherent violation of the Equal Protection clause ’

.

  1. if it cannot grant this relief, certify this question to Court of Appeals:

.

1) Is it a denial of due process and a violation of the equal protection of the law to maintain the separation between, on the one hand, Judges Above the Law, who are immune from liability to those whom they harm by violating the law and their contract for judicial services, and on the other hand, the people, who are held liable to compensate those whom they harm?

.

.

  1. Relief should be granted: “ no substantial right of Ds was prejudiced ”, CPLR §3026; P’s right to default Ds under §and to “ a speedy and inexpensive determination ”, §104, denied; and injury in fact

.

  1. grant the relief requested( A:314§H ), including, but not limited to this:

.

  1. reverse the two orders( A:1a.iii ; A:1b.iii ) and remand to a different judge

.

  1. grant the declaratory judgment branch of the motion for default and declaratory judgment( A:314¶122f ), including, among other things:

.

1) P is a citizen of NY and is entitled to the protection of its courts and the benefit of its laws; so the case will not be removed to Ds’ jurisdiction and their influence on it( A:14§§D,E )

.

2) under CPLR 306-b “ the court, upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice, [will] extend the time for service ” ( A:32¶g ) if need be

.

  1. refund all court fees below beginning with that of reargue motion( A:315¶h ) and hold Ds and judge jointly and severally liable to pay P attorneys’ fees –pro se is “ attorney ”, CPLR §105(c)– and the expenses incurred during years of litigation since 11mar13

.

  1. reverse the denial of P’s motion for a waiver of the filing fee in this court and refund the fee because its payment was occasioned by the failure of a Judiciary’s agent, i.e., the judge below, and the Judiciary itself to perform or supervise him properly, so that to charge that fee amounts to profiting from their own failure to deliver the contracted-for services.

*******************************

.

On the out-of-court strategy

for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform

.

This article is at:

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:236.

 

.

  1. As in the above case, a lawsuit involving two parties may generate an appeal that tries to hold the lower court judge liable to either or both parties for his or her wrongdoing. That appeal may need to be kept procedurally alive in court by taking all the steps and meeting all the deadlines for its proper and timely prosecution even if one is fully aware that there is no realistic expectation that judges will hold one of their own liable( ol:158 ).

.

  1. Hence the proposed out-of-court strategy for exposing the riskless wrongdoing of unaccountable judges and advocating judicial reform( ol:236 ).

.

  1. The strategy centers on causing media members, such as investigative journalists and talkshow hosts, to pursue in their own personal and professional interest the two unique national stories of President Obama-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA.

.

  1. The information about judges’ wrongdoing thus provided will so outrage that national public as to stir it up to force politicians campaigning in the primaries and the presidential election to take a stand on the issue of judicial wrongdoing, open official investigations, and hold nationally televised hearings thereon.

.

  1. Thanks to their subpoena, search & seizure, contempt, and penal powers, the official investigators, e.g., Congress, the U.S. Department of Justice, its FBI, and their state counterparts, will expose even more outrageous information. That will turn the issue of judges’ wrongdoing into a decisive one of the nominating conventions and the presidential election campaign.

.

  1. This will cause the national public to demand that politicians undertake judicial reform to prevent, detect, and punish similar outrageous conduct of judges in connivance with the politicians who recommend, nominate, and confirm them.

.

  1. The out-of-court strategy for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform is part of Dr. Cordero’s study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts, titled:

.

Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:

Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

or

http://1drv.ms/1IkvhB8

or

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=8E3D78595FC3EBB8!156&authkey=!AMV7fOyVzLPJU6g&ithint=file%2cpdf

or

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqw00v30ex3kbho/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

or

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx26luEuzfjgc1hiZXctZjdLQlE/edit?usp=sharing

or

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf

.

If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, download either of the following browsers, install it, copy the first link above into the browser search box, and hit ‘Enter’. If the file, which is close to 50MB, does not download, try using the other links:

.

Google Chrome :

https://www.google.com/chrome/

or

Mozilla-Firefox :

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/firefox/download-and-install.

.

Dare trigger history! ( jur:7§5 )…and you may enter it.

.

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

RicCordero@verizon.net, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net , Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com , Corderoric@yahoo.com

.

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

.

NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * > ggl:1 et seq. , when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

.

Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:

.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2362oh_dr-cordero-u-s-judiciary-goes-rogue-99-82-complaints-vs-judges-are-dismissed-u-s-justice-sonia-sotom_news

or

Dr. Cordero: U.S. Judiciary goes Rogue – 99.82% complaints vs. Judges are dismissed; U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor hides assets with impunity.

*******************************

.

What was once a dirty little secret–Judicial and Atty corruption is now open on the internet

Posted on by
2

http://pacourtwatch.com/2015/05/30/judges-and-lawyers-game-over/

It has taken some time, but it appears that the ‘cover up’ is being noticed.    Illinois is one of the most corrupt states and a battle ground in the War against the elderly and the disabled.
criminals who are appointed as guardians are unlawfully protected by corrupt jurists and the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois.   Jerome Larkin the administrator has been openly and notoriously aiding and abetting the billion dollar criminal enterprise.   Federal conspiracy laws 18 USCA 371 make him an easy example = his prosecution for 18 USCA 242, 18 USCA 4, and 18 USCA 1341 along with the miscreants in the Sykes case will deal a substantial blow to this elder cleansing industry.
Please take a look at the following:
 With Illinois on the verge of Bankruptcy, at the very least the co-conspirators ought to pay the income taxes due on their booty!    In the Sykes case there are several million dollars that disappeared and her home was sold at a bargain price of less than 1/2 of value.     THESE ARE TAXABLE EVENTS!     All the co-conspirators have joint and several liability for the wrongdoing and the Income taxes!

From Ken Ditkowsky – -scienter and mens rea still required and criminal actions are not just negligence

Posted on by
5

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 2, 2015 1:21 PM
To: Illinois ARDC , “information@iardc.org”
Cc: Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , Matt Senator Kirk , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , BILL DITKOWSKY , Chicago Tribune , Bev Cooper , Janet Phelan , SUNTIMES , FOX News Network LLC , Ginny Johnson , Diane Nash , Fiduciary Watch , Cook County States Attorney , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “Y. ACLU” , Scott Evans , Edward Carter , Glenda Martinez , Barbara Stone , RosANNa Miller , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Candice Schwager , “tips@cbschicago.com” , Cook Sheriff , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , Alyece Russell , Jay Goldman , “newseditors@wsj.com” , Tom Fields , Eric Blair , Nancy Vallone , “ABAJournal.com” , Len Holland , “Jim (” , Martin Kozak , Elaine Renoire , Robert Sarhan , Kathie Bakken , Martha Jantho
Subject: Additions to the ETHICS COMPLAINT AGAINST JEROME LARKIN AND THOSE WHO ACT IN CONCERT WITH HIM IN THE WAR AGAINST THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED.

DEAR SIRS,
We are aware that the Illinois Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois adheres to the only their own law,  but, pursuant to Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4 we have previously filed an ethics complaint against Larkin and his comrades as the Commission’s actions contravene the Constitution.     It now appears that the Supreme court of Illinois has filed another decision that makes it clear that the ‘cover up’ and totally inappropriate suspensions of law licenses that have been handed down to silence complaint of judicial corruption are wrongful.
Given the most extreme and imaginative interpretations of the protections that criminals in judicial robes might be afforded, the commission has intentionally over-stepped its authority.
The Supreme Court decisions have not been handed out in secret and have made it more than abundantly clear that Free Speech means exactly that and the fact that Larkin and his cadre of conspirators have acted in an intentional ultra vires manner whether or not the Supreme court of Illinois joins in the conspiracy.
A summary of the leading case has been circulated on the internet – to wit:
Date Filed: June 1, 2015
Case #: 13-893
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SCALIA, KENNEDY, GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined.ALITO, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
Full Text Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-983_7l48.pdf
CRIMINAL LAW: For a person to be convicted under 18 U.S.C.§875(c), the jury must conclude that the convicted person intended for their communication to be a threat to injure another person.
After his wife left him in 2010, Petitioner used the pseudonym “Tone Dougie” to post several obscene and ominous rap lyrics on Facebook. Although Petitioner included disclaimers to preface his lyrical tirades, he was indicted for using social media to communicate threats.  During his trial, Petitioner requested the jury be instructed to consider whether he intended to communicate threats. The criminal statute under which Petitioner was indicted makes no explicit mens rea requirement, leading the District Court to deny the request. The jury convicted him under 18 U.S.C. §875(c ), on four out of five counts, for using social media to communicate threats to injure his ex-wife, law enforcement officers, a kindergarten class, and a FBI agent. Petitioner was acquitted of communicating similar messages to patrons and employees of the park. The Court of Appeals agreed that the jury instruction would be improper since the statute required only an intent for the Petitioner to understand his words and that a reasonable person could perceive the content as threatening. On review, the Supreme Court found that criminal statutes implicitly include scienter requirements. The Court reasoned that intent would be determined by the separation of wrongful conduct and “otherwise innocent conduct.” Carter v. United States, 530 U.S. 255, 269 (2000) (quoting United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 72 (1994)). It is the communication of a threat, not simply the communication of something, the Petitioner must have intended. Without this mens rea requirement, the criminal statute becomes a negligence standard and cannot stand without a proper jury instruction. REVERSED and REMANDED.
[Summarized by: Jessica Ismond]
Let us assume that Larkin and his co-conspirators were on the moon for the past 200 years as the American Courts developed the Rule of Law as to the First Amendment.   Let us further assume that they came back yesterday.     The aforesaid decision is another coffin nail in the ‘cover up.’     NB.   Assuming at some point in time whatever the secret untrue statements that Larkin claims were made by Denison (or Amu or me for that matter) in addition to no proof of what the exact statements were or that there was any untruth specified  the element of scienter has to be also proven.     As Larkin holds a public trust pursuant to 8.3 he must report his misconduct to the Supreme Court of Illinois and the continuation of his misconduct is not only a criminal offense of deprivation of Constitutional Rights but of FRAUD.     As 24 hours have elapsed since the decision was entered Larkin has had plenty of time to remediate his fraud = if he had any intention to do so.
Ken Ditkowsky

Elonis v. US–SCOTUS still stands firmly for free speech.

Posted on by
1

As many of you will recall, the defendant in this case was charged with a crime for posting rap music lyrics on his website, which apparently, people at his job, his ex wife and some others claimed were threats against them, because we all know how nice rap music is in terms of threatening messages.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwS0hsb3g3RHFxUUE/view?usp=sharing

But the US Supreme Court isn’t buying such a standard.  The Obama administration and others wanted to use the standard, would a reasonable person feel threatened from harm and present that to the jury.

SCOTUS said the key to these cases is whether or not the speaker intended harm and not the listener.  And, to top that off, there would have to be a showing of criminal intent, that is, did the speaker intend to commit the acts constituting a crime.

So while the SCOTUS is making sure that we aren’t dumping even more people in our for-profit jail/prison system for things that really don’t amount to crimes ( publishing lyrics to rap music and having people read them to feel threatened), we have Jerome Larkin and the ARDC going after Mr. Ditkowsky, Mr. Amu and myself for publishing the truth about probate.

Then they ban all the witnesses, many witnesses testify on my behalf, but apparently the Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel team is so tied in, their testimony gets a pass over the dozens of affidavits and actual horror stories from the victims themselves who have suffered on their behalf.

Due tot he Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel team, there was never any discovery in the Sykes case, the Gold coins still have not been found, nor has there been any discovery, Mary wanted to live in her home until she died, but they sold her home for some $200k in attorneys fees–all of which is shameful behavior and all of which Mr. Jerome Larkin, head of the Illinois ARDC wants to cover up.  It’s all the truth.  The probate courts shy away from opening investigations when they should, they divvy up cases and it’s seniors and disableds for cash.

Barbara Stone’s case is “seniors for cash”– with malicious harm to her mother which was never investigated properly.  Her mother is still in grave danger of death from drugs.

Please pray for all of the above persons.  I will soon start a prayer page for all the probate victims.

Please pray for Mary G. Sykes that she died in captivity and her Advanced Directives were totally ignored by the Court and Stern, Farenga and Schmeidel at the end.

JoAnne

Bill Windsor tweets, emails and has a website and he is charged with a crime? Must be Montana

Posted on by
1

Apparently in Montana if you tell the truth about the criminal justice system and corruption anywhere, they come right after you and arrest you.

Bill Windsor, publisher of “Lawless America” where many probate victims and corruption victims can be seen crying their eyes out over horrific injustices done to them and their loved ones, is easily found on youtube.com.

The stories are true and are told by the victims.  But that doesn’t stop the State of Montana from supressing his First Amendment rights.

Barbara Stone, an attorney in Florida, currently has a body attachment (arrest warrant) out for her civil probate case in which she merely expressed concerns that her mother should not be given Miralax, a drug with black box warnings which is contraindicated for seniors.  Then she spoke out against abuse in Jan. 2014 when her mother was sent to the ER with fractures, lacerations, contusions, pneumonia, severe weight loss, malnutrition–all under the care of Attorneys Mark Raymond and Roy Lustig–her tormenters and their 2 “care (death) givers”–none of which was ever prosecuted for these horriffic crimes nor investigated by the Fla. states attorneys offices despite the horror of their crimes, the prosecution/persecution of Barbara Stone for speaking out against elder abuse, and in particular her own mother.

Please pray today for all of these victims and their families.

Please pray that Bill Windsor isn’t incarcerated in the USA because he stands against corruption and the persecution and proseuction of probate victims and court corruption victims.

You can read the article on him here:

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1461%3A66-year-old-filmmaker-faces-prison-in-montana-for-emailing-tweeting-and-having-a-website&catid=1%3Alatest-news

JoAnne