To: scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tonight’s Cooper’s Corner
Date: Aug 13, 2015 10:29 AM
|
If I understand what you are saying, you feel that my suggesting Honesty, Honor and fidelity as a solution to the problem of guardianship for the indolent, obnoxious, incompetent and uncontrollable elder or disabled person who now needs social services is naive. Indeed, in a vacuum it does seem to be Pollyannaish. But, it is not. It is not because we do have good people out there and the Jerome Larkin et al conspirators are a minority – but growing.
This is the reason we need the media, the legal profession, and citizens in general to defy the conspirators (including but not limited to Larkin, and his group) and clean up the mess now before it become metastatic. Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators have unilaterally revoked the Constitution of both the US and the State of Illinois for not only lawyers, but all members of the class of people who are called elderly or disabled.
Last night after I talked with Bev Cooper on her program it occurred to me that Larkin and his co-conspirators have made a massive intrusion on our liberty that is even greater than we observed. They have set up an alternate justice system so as to better assault the Bill of Rights. Let me explain. The members of the legal profession are the last rallying point for defense of the constitution. Right now as an example fair minded people have looked at Hillary Clinton’s foray in the cyber world of e-mails and are thinking – if that had been me, the jail house is in my future; however, lawyers are out there making certain that she is not persecuted because she is Hillary Clinton, or that she does not get a pass because she is Hillary Clinton. (Ditto for Chancellor Wise of the University of Illinois).
Defending the constitutional rights of citizens is the sacred duty of every single member of the legal profession. The obligation is a birth right and one of the obligations that if you shirk you lose your self respect. (This is the reason that I lobby daily for a HONEST investigation of the Mary Sykes and similar elder cleansing cases – my personal self respect requires it).
Larkin first based his rationalization that he had a right to censor the call for an Honest investigation on the Sawyer case. Had he and his co-conspirators read the case they would have found that the last paragraph negated their argument. After I quoted the last paragraph as an argument against Larkin’s position he in his usually intellectual dishonest way dropped citing the case. Prevarication and subterfuge were substituted for honest legal argument.
The most recent example was found in the JoAnne Denison documents wherein the IARDC tortured the Alvarez case and distorted its reasoning to suggest that an argument that the Supreme Court of the United States rejected was the basis of the decision. (Alvarez held that even false statements are protected by the First Amendment – Alvarez claimed to be a medal of honor winner – he was not)
The disciplinary proceedings against both JoAnne and myself were based upon our calling the Justice Department for an HONEST investigation. (see Cynthia Farenga letter – Ms Farenga read the Probate Sharks blog and found a call for an Honest investigation of the elder cleansing cases. She notified Ms Black – a stooge of Mr. Larkin – and shortly afterwards disciplinary proceedings followed against first me and then JoAnne)
Why are the miscreants so upset by an Honest investigation. An honest investigation would cause the prosecution of the dishonest judges involved as well as the dishonest guardians, guardians ad litem, and other judicial officials. An Honest investigation would lead back to political figures (including nursing home operators) who are reaping in billions of dollars in loot! An Honest investigation would result in capital gains on property stolen from wards becoming ordinary income, and worse yet an Honest investigation would end the very lucrative War on the Elderly and disabled. The the Conspirators assaulted the First Amendment.
If you recall my hearing. The IARDC attorney held a copy of my letter to the Attorney General of the United States in his hand and asked me if I was repentant for writing it!
The legislature and the Congress worked long and hard to address the plight of the elderly and the disabled. Previously the Courts developed the doctrine of parens patrie. All of the above was designed to address the problem of even the most incorrigible senior et al. In fact they worked. Or at least they worked into our miscreant conspirators discovered the amount of money that was available by elder cleansing.
My solution is not to throw the baby out with the bath water, but to get rid of the scum of the legal profession starting with the administrator of the IARDC. I suggest that we send a message – TAX THE BASTARDS! let them pay all the interest, penalties and taxes due.
Our state needs the money – the money Larkin himself owes would make a great contribution to the pension crisis and send a message. There is going to be claimed an $800,000 capital gain on Mary’s house. That should be a One million dollar ordinary income report! The other 2 million dollars stolen is also subject to income tax.
Why is Larkin and his miscreant co-conspirators being given a pass?
The short answer is found in the word “corruption” If we just enforce our laws there is a place of accommodation for the elderly and the disabled.
Ken Ditkowsky
|
