In PA, mortgage foreclosures set aside for failure of notice provisions

Thanks to Cynthia Stevens, blog fan:
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT HOLDS THAT ALL FORECLOSURES BASED UPON INCORRECT ACT 91 NOTICES MAY BE SET ASIDE AT ANY TIME; OUR ACT 91 NOTICE WAS CORRECT February 2012                                                                                                                        by  Peter E. Meltzer 
On January 30, 2012, in a decision of major importance to mortgage holders in Pennsylvania, the Superior Court held that the form of Act 91 Notice promulgated by the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency does not contain an important provision required by the statute and that, as a result, all residential mortgage foreclosures which began with a defective Act 91 Notice are subject to being set aside at any time. This is so even if the mortgagee or its counsel relied on the Model Uniform Notice (i.e. the approved form) which was issued by the Legislature in connection with the statute.  In particular, the mortgagee is required to notify the borrower that they have a right to a face-to-face meeting with the mortgagee, and not just the consumer credit counseling agency.  The Model Uniform Notice does not contain this required language but most mortgagees and law firms simply relied on that language in sending out their Act 91 Notices and thus they are incorrect. This holding was announced a few weeks ago in Beneficial Consumer Discount Company v. Vukman, 2012 Pa. Super 18 (2012).
The decision is significant because it is jurisdictional, meaning that the issue can be raised at any time, even after a Sheriff’s sale, and will have major repercussions on Pennsylvania foreclosures.   Moreover, the fact that the attorney or lender or loan servicer relied in good faith on the regulations was held not to be a valid defense.
More information can be found here including an entire white paper from Penn. Legal Aid Society:
Avoiding Foreclosure Update 2012 Pennsylvania Legal Aid Network June 12, 2012
Case Summaries Bank of New York Mellon v. Ellis, PA Super April 23, 2012 (summary judgment in foreclosure reversed re no showing of compliance with FHA servicing requirements)
Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Vukman, 2012 PA Super 18 (court set aside mortgage foreclosure sheriff sale based on defect in Act 91 pre-foreclosure notice) Bennett et al. v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes, PA Super. March 6, 2012 (a UDAP issue, UDAP sometimes being used in cases involving mortgage companies)
Cave v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc. and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75276 (E.D. Pa. May 30, 2012). Court declined to dismiss breach of contract count in class action case seeking to enforce HAMP trial plan.
Healey v. Wells Fargo, 2012 WL 994564 (Pa.Com.Pl.), CCP Lackawanna, March 12, 2012. Court declined to dismiss (preliminary objections) breach of contract, UDAP, fraud in the execution and promissory estoppel counts in action seeking to enforce HAMP trial plan. Court sustained p.o.’s re fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, infliction of emotional distress. (Note: Wells provided borrowers a copy of the trial plan signed by a Wells employee.)
Jones v. Wells Fargo, 2012 Bankr LEXIS 1450 (E.D. La. 2012) (debtor awarded punitive damages of $3.1 against Wells Fargo for servicing abuses). Court declared that Wells Fargo exhibited “reprehensible” The court had previously found that the bank improperly applied payments to interest and fees instead of principal and improperly charged the debtor more than $24,000 in fees.
WMC Mortgage v. Baker, 2012 WL 628003 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 28, 2012) (TILA rescission upheld in case where securitization trust proceed

If you find corruption in the courts, report it here.

Please rate the judges on this page and let others know what they do.

In the case of Mary G Sykes she was narcotized to death at age 95 under the supervision of Judge Aicha MacCarthy who never cared about this woman.  She let attorneys Farenga, Stern and Schmeidel run amok in her courtroom terrorizing Mary and Gloria Sykes.  Mary Sykes was narcotized to death without autopsy or tox screen. This must end.

Go rate your judges now.

Show the ARDC and Jerome Larkin you support Attorneys that blog about corruption!

A new go fund me in response to a $17,000 bill that I recently received for my ARDC trial.

It’s absolutly outrageous.  I am cleaning up the messes they leave behind because they cannot read and are not interested in the US Consitution.

They want attorneys to cover up the “target, isolate, drain the estate, eliminate and cremate” mantra their lack of disciplining dirty attorneys foster and protect in Illinois probate courts.

I don’t have the money because I run a charity and represent clients for free or low cost.


If you want to send them a check written on a coffin of your deceased loved one, a check on the shirt of your back, I would be glad to send it along.

Checks written on special items–obituaries, memorial services, maybe even Alice Gore’s gold teeth, will most certainly be sent along and I will publish the pictures here.

If you don’t know how to do this, I will be glad to help you.  Just bring in any photo you want and it will be reproduced on a check to their dirty, no good, transcript changing, Elder Cleansing and Assisting, corrupted state agency.

Mark all checks “donation to end corruption.”



Court of App for Fed Circuit Upholds offensive TMs and the First Amendment

from the wall street journal:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington struck down a long-standing provision in federal law and sided with Simon Tam, the frontman for the Asian-American rock band The Slants, who sought to register the band’s name. A U.S. Patent and Trademark Office examiner had denied it, saying the phrase was likely disparaging to people of Asian descent.

Tuesday’s decision endorsed a robust view of the First Amendment as it struck down a nearly 70-year-old provision in the Lanham Act that barred the registration of disparaging trademarks. The court, however, also acknowledged its ruling opened the door for the registration of trademarks that contain ethnic slurs and “offend vulnerable communities.”

“Whatever our personal feelings about the mark at issue here, or other disparaging marks, the First Amendment forbids government regulators to deny registration because they find the speech likely to offend others,” Judge Kimberly Moore wrote for the court’s majority. She said the Constitution protects free speech “even when speech inflicts great pain.”

Tuesday’s case wasn’t unanimous. One dissenting judge, Alan Lourie, disputed the idea that there were bedrock First Amendment principles at stake. He likened the case to the recent Supreme Court battle over whether Texas could reject a license plate featuring the Confederate battle flag. In the case before the high court, justices concluded that license plate designs are “government speech” and fall outside of First Amendment protection.

Tuesday’s decision overturned past legal precedent and would “further the degradation of civil discourse,” wrote Judge Lourie.

The trademark office has rejected a number of other trademarks on the basis that they were disparaging. Among the more controversial decisions, it objected to an applicant who wanted to register “Khoran” as a trademark for wine. And it turned down an attempt by Heeb magazine, a publication marketed to young urban Jews, to register “Heeb.”

From Ken Ditkowsky – Get the IRS involved in Sykes!


From: kenneth ditkowsky <>

To: JoAnne M Denison <>, Probate Sharks <>, Tim NASGA <>, Nasga Us <>, Janet Phelan <>, Eric Holder <>, “FBI- ( (” <>, Chicago FBI <>, “J. Ditkowsky” <>, Matt Senator Kirk <>, “” <>, Chicago Tribune <>, FOX News Network LLC <>, SUNTIMES <>, ISBA Main Discussion Group <>, “” <>, Candice Schwager <>, KRISTI HOOD <>, Katherine Hine <>, Edward Carter <>, Cook County States Attorney <>

Subject: Re: Fw: WSJ Blogs – Ruling Upholding Offensive Trademarks Could Give Redskins a Boost – Law Blog

Date: Jan 27, 2016 9:58 PM

I am more interested the Rule of Law that is expressed.

I would like hit the following as hard as I can, to wit:

The more I delve into this elder cleansing scenario the more reprehensible I find the corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, and the corrupt judicial officials.    The situation is absolutely amazing.    How in America can public money be used openly and notoriously to promulgate the interests of criminal enterprises?

Let’s look at the Mary Sykes case as an example.   The file is 09 P 4585 and is open to the public to view.   No portion of the file is under seal, and therefore absent official cleansing by unauthorized miscreants the shame is in public view.

Service of process on Mary.    It is an axiom that a Court must gain jurisdiction over a respondent in order to enter any order or judgment.    (Even Jerome Larkin cannot misrepresent to the law to dispute that fact).     Now let us examine the file.

Where did Mary reside when the Petition was filed?   According to communication by Cynthia Farenga with Judge Connors, Mary resided in DuPage County and therefore, Adam Stern, a Cook County attorney, who lived in DuPage County was appointed as the 2nd guardian ad litem.    The guardianship statute requires the venue be in the county in which the alleged disabled person resides.

Examine the file – the case was filed in Cook County.

Look at the Summons:

i.    The summons that are all unserved do not comply with the statutory requirements.

ii.    The petitioner tells a blatant untruth to the Sheriff.   She gives the Sheriff instruction to serve Mary at a place in Cook County that Mary does not reside as by force Mary was removed from that place.    Such is pure and simple FRAUD.

iii.   This fraud is compounded as the petitioner claims that Mary cannot be served and therefore asks for a special process server.

iv.    The sheriff wrote a letter denying that his office ever served Mary!By misrepresentation and another fraud the Court proceeded without a proper Sheriff’s return being filed that the proper summons was served upon Mary.   Ergo, no jurisdiction no matter how the fraud is sliced up.

d.      755 IlCS 5/11a – 10  requires 14 days prior notice on the immediate family members of a competency hearing.     No one even makes a claim that Mary’s relatives were notified at any time.   See Gloria Sykes affidavit.   The file does not have any claim of service of the 14 day prior notice.    Under the Sodini case there was thus no jurisdiction.    The 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators with Larkin, the two guardians, and the attorney for the miscreant guardian claim that the relatives knew of the hearing.    Unfortunately, Mr. PS, the attorney for the guardian and the guardian ad litem admitted that there was no hearing on competency.   Thus, it was and is a fraud on the Court to assert any claim of knowledge.

e.      A hearing is required by due process. By its very nature, a guardianship is a judicial forfeiture of liberty, and property rights.   Thus, under the fifth and fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution and Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution a guardianship promulgated and executed without notice and hearing is per se unconstitutional.      No matter how you slice and dice this situation the lawyers involved in this Conduct committed serious felonies.   18 USCA 242 conspiracy to deny a citizen due process of law has to be reported to the law enforcement authorities.    To prevent the reporting is a violation of 18 USCA 4 and 18 USCA 241.     Lawyers who disrespect their duty to defend the Constitution and obstruct justice or cover-up such unconstitutional acts must be not only disbarred, but punished to the full extent of the law.

i.      Not only are the corrupt lawyers, corrupt judges, and all who aid and abet their conduct serious felons, but, their conduct cannot be tolerated or condoned.

ii.      Under the Americans With Disabilities act, and 755 IlCS 5/11a – 3b the guardianship authorization is severely limited to a reasonable accommodation of the an alleged disabled person.    Thus, to use the guise of guardianship to railroad a senior citizen into a guardianship – who may or may not be competent – THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS UPON THE PETITION TO PROVE THE DEGREE OF INCOMPETENCY BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE – brings forth the felonies of mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud (when the bank accounts are accessed) and tax fraud.

The frauds noted are all proven by the Court file in 09 P 4585.     Judge Stuart was observed by Court watchers during the kangaroo proceedings brought by Larkin against JoAnne Denison fire denying under oath that she misused her Court jurisdiction to threaten Gloria Sykes in an attempt to ascertain where Gloria kept her own personal assets, and then on cross examination admitted to the criminal offense committed in her courtroom.     The altering of the Court record and transcript by persons unknown – but believed to be public employees of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission compounds the felonies committed against Gloria Sykes and the Sykes estate.    The theft of Ms. Sykes funds has not been resolved, thought Judge Jane Stuart literally fled the bench when her perjury was disclosed.

Law enforcement has not acted to prosecute the criminal actions of the two guardian ad litem, the guardian, and unknown persons.   Nor has it acted to prosecute the ‘cover up’ and the 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 conspiracies to commit theft, mail fraud, wire fraud, and tax fraud.      Few criminal cases are prosecutable from probate court files, but, the Mary Sykes case is certainly one of them.    Prosecution of Jerome Larkin and his associates at the IARDC for their criminal conspiracies will go a long way to restoring public confidence in the Illinois judicial system and respect for the law.

The guardianship cases and particularly Sykes lend themselves to a remedy that does not involve criminal prosecutions, but appeals to the public with even greater joy.     For years the public has watched public officials from judges, aldermen, mayors, governors et al go to jail.    Club Fed in many cases was a disappointment as the miscreant public officials actually found punishment to be quite enjoyable.    They received three square meals a day, a clean place to sleep, recreation, and time to read, study and relax.    It was akin to ordering a middle aged person to relax and enjoy life!    Only the artificial stigma marred the ‘vacation.’     To the public this type of punishment was *****.

Illinois and the United States of America both are having pecuniary issues.    Illinois is on the verge of Bankruptcy.    Elmer Gantry cannot talk us out of the fiscal crisis.    HOWEVER, Jerome Larkin and his cronies have been well compensated for their perfidy.     The public would find it highly satisfying if the United States of America and the State of Illinois would just collect the taxes, interest and penalties due from Larkin and each of his co-conspirators.    Larkin and his co-conspirators have no defense!    Forgetting about the overt acts that Larkin committed; however, focusing on his 18 USCA 371, 18 USCA 4, and 18 USCA 242 conspiracies in the aggregate Larkin owes more than a billion dollars.    The math is very simple.

The breach of fiduciary relationship is a taxable event.   Ergo, when the guardian removed and took possession of a million dollars in gold coins on day one, she incurred taxable income of a million dollars.   (She did not inventory a single coin and therefore every coin is charged to her taxable 1040 income).    When another two million dollars (plus or minus) disappeared the Federal and State income tax on another two million dollars was due from the guardian.   As co-conspirators, Larkin and his gang incurred joint and several liability with the guardian.     Let’s add up the liability.   1) Tax on three million dollars, 2) 50% tax fraud penalty, and interest at 2% per month until 100% of the principal sum is assessed.

As Larkin, Black, Smart, Opryszek, Loftus, Sang Yul Lee, Splitt, etc. all conspired to aid and abet the theft and cover it up, each enjoyed equal liability for the State and Federal Taxes.     Ditto for the theft of Gloria Sykes personal funds!     It is quite clear that each of Larkin’s gang (including the volunteer panels that Larkin maintains for his kangaroo hearings) had a positive duty to access file 09 P 4585 or dismiss the attorney disciplinary charges for failure to meet the standard of clear and convincing.    There is no immunity for tax evasion or tax fraud.    There is no immunity for overt criminal action.   THUS, the tax authorities have absolutely no problem in collection of the taxes.    Illinois does not need tax increases – it needs tax enforcement!

We need to get the IRS to get their hot little hands into this mess.    Larkin and his gang are in this situation for the money – let’s take the incentive out of the picture!     Everyone is well aware of the criminal activity and sitting on their hands — let’s make the IRs and the IDR into heros!

Ken Ditkowsky

From Ken Ditkowsky–Larkin is not ashamed to be ignorant of the Law

To: Eric Holder <>, “FBI- ( (” <>, Chicago FBI <>, Tim NASGA <>, Probate Sharks <>, “JoAnne M. Denison” <>, Nasga Us <>, Bev Cooper <>, Janet Phelan <>, “J. Ditkowsky” <>, Matt Senator Kirk <>, “” <>, Chicago Tribune <>, FOX News Network LLC <>, SUNTIMES <>, ISBA Main Discussion Group <>, Fiduciary Watch <>, Candice Schwager <>, “” <>, Glenda Martinez <>, Diane Nash <>, Ginny Johnson <>, Rosanna Miller <>, Scott Evans <>, Cook County States Attorney <>, Edward Carter <>, Littleton Coin Company, KRISTI HOOD <>, “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” <>, Jay Goldman <>, Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik <>, Illinois ARDC <>, Nancy Vallone <>, Alyece Russell <>, Tom Fields <>, “” <>, Eric Blair <>, Cook Sheriff <>, Elaine Renoire <>, Len Holland <>, John Howard Wyman <>, Mary Richards <>, Janet Phelan <>, Andy Ostrowski <>, Martin Kozak <>, Kathie Bakken <>, Barbara Stone <>, “Jim (” <>, Doug Franks <>, 60m Cbs News <>, Robert Sarhan <>, Martha Jantho <>, “Truthbetoldradio (” <>, Dow Jones <>, ACLU of Illinois <>, Kevin Pizzarello <>, “Dow Jones & Company Inc.” <>, Sylvia Rudek NASGA <>, Harry Heckert <>, “” <>, ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession <>, Bettergov Info <>, “Dr. Rich Swier” <>, “” <>, “Dow Jones & Company Inc.” <>
Cc: Teresa Lyles <>, Doug Franks <>, Beverly Newman <>, Pam Zuckman NBC <>, Marti Oakley <>, Douglas Kinan <>, The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right <>, DOEA INFO <>, Marty Prehn <>
Subject: Blog subject matter
Date: Jan 27, 2016 6:21 PM
The MaryGSykes and the Probate Sharks blogs are particularly interesting today   – they are worth a read.
I had an opportunity today to read some of the pleadings that Mr. Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 cronies have filed in the Supreme Court.   It is very clear that either Larkin and the people employed at the ARDC have no idea what the Constitution says, or they just do not care, or they are intentionally misrepresenting the law to the Illinois Supreme Court.
It really does not matter as lawyers are supposed to know the law and a lawyer who intentionally misrepresents the law is guilty of very serious ethical violations that should result in disbarment.   Of course as Jerome Larkin is administering the lawyer disciplinary commission of Illinois and he has a great frugality with the truth, all bets are off.    (This is reported as Rule 8.3 requires that lawyers cannot sit idle and allow the Rule of Law to be ignored!    18 USCA 4, 18 USCA 371, and 18 USCA 242 are clear in defining Larkin as a co-conspirator in the obstruction of Justice (cover up) that the felonies of elder cleansing connote.   
Ms. Denison usually puts the obscene and Rule 137 violating pleadings of Larkin on her web-site (MaryGSykes) so that :Larkin’s shame can be observed by all and the corruption of the judiciary in Illinois not escape public notice.   Larkin’s argument that the disclosure of judicial corruption in Illinois is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater is a classic!   Few lawyers would have the temerity to even whisper such a stupid and embarrassing statement. Interesting that Larkin is not embarrassed – THAT SHOULD GIVE THE PUBLIC AN INSIGHT OF HOW THE 2ND OLDEST PROFESSION HAS GONE TO SEED.   
The suggestion that for society to flourish and prosper all the lawyers must be sent to the happy hunting ground of the native Americans is fast proving accurate – especially when you have Larkin in charge of disciplining lawyers!   God bless us all Tiny Tim — we need it!

From Ken Ditkowsky–yet another complaint to the ARDC

From: kenneth ditkowsky <>
Sent: Jan 26, 2016 9:09 PM
To: Attorney General Pam Bondi <>, Governor Rick Scott <>, Eric Holder <>, “FBI- ( (” <>, Chicago FBI <>, Tim NASGA <>, Probate Sharks <>, “JoAnne M. Denison” <>, Bev Cooper <>, Illinois ARDC <>, “” <>, The United States House of Representatives <>, Atty Diane Saltoun IAG Illinois Atty General <>, Janet Phelan <>, Matt Senator Kirk <>, Chicago Tribune <>, FOX News Network LLC <>, SUNTIMES <>, ISBA Main Discussion Group <>
Cc: Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik <>, Elderjusticecoalition Info <>, “” <>
Subject: Re:Complaint by citizen concerning the actions of Jerome Larkin and Miriam Solo

just want to make sure that the IARDC, and Mr. Larkin, in front of witnesses gets an opportunity to do its job
This e-mail is yet another ethics complaint against Mr. Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirator Miriam Solo.

From: kenneth ditkowsky <>
To: Attorney General Pam Bondi <>; Governor Rick Scott <>; Eric Holder <>; FBI- ( ( <>; Chicago FBI <>; Tim NASGA <>; Probate Sharks <>; JoAnne M. Denison <>; Bev Cooper <>; Illinois ARDC <>; <>; The United States House of Representatives <>; Atty Diane Saltoun IAG Illinois Atty General <>; Janet Phelan <>; Matt Senator Kirk <>; Chicago Tribune <>; FOX News Network LLC <>; SUNTIMES <>; ISBA Main Discussion Group <>
Cc: Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:02 PM
Subject: Pursuant to Rule 8.3 the Illinois ARDC has refused to investigate this matter — The question is Why?

It is always interesting as to what Mr. Larkin of the Illinois ARDC will investigate and what he is disinterested.   We have a theory – as  Larkin does not disclose his pecuniary relationships there is pretty strong evidence as his motivation.
Public Officials in Illinois have to make the disclosures == the person we suspect of having a direct line to Larkin has great clout!   However, as the FBI has been enjoying a concert from ****, at this point in time they know more about ****** that his own wife.
The Irving (Fisk) Faskowitz Florida Estate Post is under construction…pardon our dust.  This Shark post is a dedicated terminal link for the entire file, including the Florida Appellate Court Appeal of Rabbi Moshe Faskowitz which will be displayed on the dedicated Shark Drop Box toggle link. An independent genealogy refutes the Rabbi Moshe Faskowitz claim. This genealogy corroborates the suspicion of the Florida Assistant Attorney that the appellant was not entitled to the proceeds of the Estate of Irving (Fisk) Faskowitz. It is the sincere hope of this Shark that the two younger brothers of Irving (Fisk) Faskowitz, Samuel and David or their progeny would be located and claim the estate that they are justifiably entitle to. In addition, the FBI had started a case back in 2008 on the alleged fraud perpetrated , but never had the benefit of the genealogy created by Arden White. They really should take another look at this estate.
Updated 10-17-2012

From Janet Phelan: a new article and Book Review on Judicial Corruption–Bad Minds High Places

Bad Minds, High Places available on

Bad Minds, High Places” is the story of America’s failed legal culture and the FBI raids on Cleveland from 2008 to the present. It portrays the foibles of American public life from Ohio to Washington State and the ethos under which its legal system operates. The book is an absorbing, non-fiction account of an attorney subjected to fraudulent charges, arrest, extradition, jail and coordinated aggression on a national basis after he published an editorial critical of a Cleveland, Ohio judge. The author forces the reader to see a new model for state judiciaries as self-serving interest groups with the most gruesome failures in jurisdictions where judges are elected and heavily politicized. “Bad MInds”, is not only about individual failure on the part of one judge. It tells how politicized judges, prosecutors, attorneys and police cooperated at the state and federal level to commit serial offenses and obstruct accountability for their failures. The originality of the book is in the magnitude and irony of the failures it exposes and the uncomprehending persona of the author as a character distinct from the consensus which created the failures besetting him.

This is the stuff of paranoid fantasies, no? Unfortunately, the fantastic is now the real. Writes Grundstein in the epilogue to his book:
Government and organized crime are not all that different. The idea is to get something for your group at the expense of people who aren’t in it. The Jewish Holocaust can be cast as not only racism, but a planned transfer of wealth. You kill the person you’ve cheated in order to remove his voice. Andrew Jackson did it with the Cherokee Indians after gold was found in Georgia. No one is innocent.
At a time when lawyers who attempt to uphold the rule of law are disciplined, jailed, sanctioned or disbarred—Richard Fine, Don Bailey, Ken Ditkowsky, Lanre Amu, Andy Ostrowski, Grant Goodman, among others—it is heartening to see the bravery that some of these individuals are exhibiting. Ken Ditkowsky’s writings are being blogged by another attorney-under-fire, JoAnne Denison, and appear regularly at After a harrowing year and a half in LA County jail, attorney Richard Fine has launched the Campaign for Judicial Integrity.
Andy Ostrowski recently made a run for a seat in the US House of Representatives and now hosts a radio show concerning justice issues.
By writing such an engaging and—frankly—disturbing account of powerful people misusing their power in shameful ways, Robert Grundstein joins a growing choir of knowledgeable voices who are declaring, in essence, the utter failure of the US legal system. Writes Grundstein,
Politics is defined as competition for resources under conditions of scarcity. It’s common for judiciaries to be politicized, especially in states where judges are elected. However, when the legal system charged with keeping your group together is politicized, it will discriminate in favor of itself at the expense of the people it’s designed to protect….There will be higher priority people in the interest group and those outside. No one will trust government or the law….

From Mark Adams, JD/MBA and Kirk MacKenzie–important articles

Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:06:49 -0600

Mark and Kirk;

Thanks for doing what you are doing to work on Judicial Accountability.

—–Original Message—–
From: Mark Adams
Sent: Jan 25, 2016 1:46 PM
To: “” , “”
Cc: “”

Thanks, Kirk.

Unfortunately, as usual and by design, the commentators do not realize how justice was supposed to be secured because they do not understand government nor are they aware of the means to control it.  A brief explanation follows:

What is government other than making and enforcing rules?

So, who makes the rules?

Laws can be made by popular vote as in direct democracies or by the vote of elected representatives in representative democracies, like the U.S. once was.  However, if the votes are counted in secret, you don’t have a democratic government because the people who control the secret vote count are the real law making rulers, not the voters.

So, who enforces the rules?

In any democracy, the people must have the power to enforce the law; otherwise, the people are ruled by an aristocracy which can enforce the law as they want.

In Britain and the U.S. before the fascists took over, any person could institute criminal charges against those whom he believed broke the law, just like in Ancient Athens, and if the majority of people on the grand jury thought that the charges showed probable cause that the law had been broken, the person bringing the charges could prosecute the defendant(s) before a trial jury or hire an attorney to do so or hope and pray that the public prosecutor would do so.

Before the fascists took over the U.S., the facts and law would be argued before a jury of citizens who would determine whether or not the defendant(s) were guilty, and a guilty verdict had to be unanimous, an improvement over Athens where the majority ruled even at trial.

Yes, juries could nullify law in a democratic justice system because the people rule.  Not guilty due to self-defense, duress, etc. came from jury verdicts, not legislatures.  By the way, alcohol prohibition was repealed because it became nearly impossible for the government to win any conviction.

So, how do you restore justice and good government?

In order to restore justice and good government, you have to restore the means provided in the U.S. Constitution for the people to rule.  To restore the power to throw bad representatives out of office, the votes must be counted in public.  To restore justice, the right to petition for redress of grievances must once again mean that any person can present information to a grand jury and ask for the jurors to vote to investigate further or indict and then, be once again empowered to pursue such investigation or indictment.  Finally, to restore justice, the right to trial by jury must be restored in all proceedings in which the rights to life, liberty or property are at issue, and this must include rights which have been renamed as privileges in order for the ruling elite to take them without a jury trial.

Since this fundamental information has been eliminated from the ruling elite’s “educational” system, few can imagine how government was supposed to be controlled in our Republic, but I’ve done a lot more research than most.  For a U.S. Supreme Court case which talks about the fundamental right to secure justice by bringing a petition for redress to the grand juries, see Blyew v. U.S. at

Make sure that you read the dissent so that you understand that we were not supposed to have to beg a prosecuting prince to present evidence to the grand juries, but instead, we were supposed to be able to present our petitions for redress of grievances for crimes committed directly to the grand juries!

Also, note that the opinion doesn’t say that a prosecutor can obstruct the right to petition, but instead, it holds that since there was no Federal law criminalizing murder at that time, the murderers could not be prosecuted in Federal court at that time.

This case resulted in the passage of the Federal laws prohibiting violations of rights under color of law so that murderers and prosecutors who covered up murder could be prosecuted!  See the following statutes:

18 U.S.C. § 241 provides that a conspiracy to violate rights under color of law is a felony.  See

18 U.S.C. § 242 provides that a violation of rights under color of law is a felony.  See

18 U.S.C. § 4 provides that any person who knows of the commission of a felony and fails to report it to the appropriate authorities has committed a felony. See

18 U.S.C. § 3 provides that any person who helps conceal any criminal offense has committed a criminal offense.  See

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

P.S. I explain this in the attached speech.  By the way, the Feds leaned on this Tea Party group and forced it to shut down shortly after I gave this speech.  Ironically, they were telling Congress that they were not doing such things at the very same time, but who is going to hold the Feds liable for lying to Congress when the means to do so have been stolen?

P.P.S. There are still two ways to enforce the law.  One was designed to allow the public to protect themselves from both criminals and tyrants, and it is still perfectly legal.  The other was designed to help banksters steal property without having to worry about pesky juries getting in the way, and it can still be used.  Unfortunately, almost no one knows about either of these means.

Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:58:03 -0700

Most Americans believe the judicial system, for all its faults, at least attempts to provide justice, and does so in most cases. Given the Hage, Bundy, Hammond, and Drakes Bay Farm cases, perhaps it is time for a reassessment. Here are two more case studies to consider.
Watch “Making A Murderer” if you have Netflix.  This 10-episode series incredibly combines an exposé of our judicial system with a riveting real-life story. I now understand the term “binge viewing”. Once started, you will want to watch it to the end. The injustice exposed by this series has led to national attention, and over one-half million signatures to reopen the case. You will thank me for the suggestion.
The story of Dr. Richard Fine is another case. Dr. Fine may be new to most of you. The link provided in the forwarded email below will get you started. Linda is a friend and former fellow UWSA member.
(from JoAnne, I have just published an article on life of Dr. Fine, just search him on this blog–he is a true hero).
Begin forwarded message:

From: Linda
Subject: Hello
Date: January 23, 2016
To: “Kirk MacKenzie” <>
I wanted to share these articles with you to show why there is no justice within our court system.
If you can, please share the links below with others.  Thanks.
Warm regards,

Texas court steals $160 million disabled trust and loots it–with impunity

By John Griffing

DALLAS, Texas (Texas Insider Report) – After Dallas citizen Jeff Baron was “sentenced” to an unprecedented civil lockdown to enable lawyers to loot his Juvenile Diabetes Research Trust, the 5th Circuit Court has now upheld the judicially authorized theft (in the amount of $160 million dollars), according to the latest information available on the case. On January 19, 2015, Texas Insider carried an exclusive story entitled “Human Being Put Into ‘Receivership’ by Federal Judge in Dallas, Texas,” detailing a massive “judicial corruption racket.”  

The story noted that the corruption was “so pervasive,” Dallas entrepreneur and now medically disabled Dallas citizen, Jeff Baron, “had all (or most) of his constitutional rights unlawfully stripped.”

Now Baron is being told he has no right to due process and to stop bothering courts.

Background: In an otherwise typical civil lawsuit, Baron had his home, bank accounts, phone, car and the remainder of his worldly possessions illegally seized at an undisclosed meeting among court officers, without a hearing, trial or attorney, and he was threatened with death by the judge assigned to his case if he resisted or attempted to hire a lawyer (as seen in the court transcripts).

Furgeson, Judge RoyalHis offense? Baron was accused of causing a delay in a settled lawsuit and not paying his lawyers enough money—charges that were later proven to be completely fabricated. After he received press coverage, Baron and his family and friends were repeatedly “visited” by Homeland Security and the U.S. Marshals despite having not been accused of any crime.

Judge Royal Furgeson (right,) was the federal judge who initially placed Baron into receivership and seized all of his possessions and documents and forbid Baron indefinitely from keeping any money that he earned. Furgeson has been succeeded by Judge Sam Lindsay, who granted immunity to all of the attorneys and others involved in the theft of Baron’s property. Judge Lindsay also released a statement in March 2015 condemning the press coverage of Baron’s case.

Now, Baron has been sternly reminded that he is not entitled to due process (), having his rights to court appeal denied and banned indefinitely. Baron is one of the first martyrs of Orwellian tyranny in the United States, according to notable observers. New York attorney, David Relkin, who has been following the case, stated, “The only accurate analogy to Baron’s situation is that he became an inmate at Guantanamo Bay.”

From the looks of this story, it appears that this man is subject to the same proceedings we are seeing in Probate where assets are seized, handed over to attorneys, then both judge and attorneys are granting themselves immunity.

See the full article here:

Texas Citizen Still in Civil Lockdown: Court Destroys Evidence, Extinguishes Due Process Rights

The worst part of the story is that these miscreants stole from a charity!  That’s right, one that serves people and children with diabetes.

How low can our court system go?

A long history in Indiana of abusing the Mentally Disabled says Tim Lahrman

Mr. Tim Lahrman is one of the most helpful, kind “disabled adults” that I have come to know.  He regularly writes pleadings for the disabled, reads cases, is highly skilled in the law–yet is under guardianship in Indiana!

How does this happen?  Tim Lahrman ran a very successful electronics store or stores in Indianapolis. They were worth millions.  But one day, evil greedy brother ran into court on false pretenses that Tim smoked marijuana frequently and was in need of a guardianship.  The court agreed, stripped Tim Lahrman of all his rights and handed over control of the electronics store to evil brother.  Of course, we all know what happens after that–assets are sold, but many simply disappear.  Evil brother is now rich, bank accounts of the business quickly drained, but the court and all court appointed lawyers and vendors are happy because they have been paid well.  Tim Lahrman screams like a stuck pig, but no one listens because he is “an addict” and must be controlled, or that is, fleeced.

See below:

1907 Indiana Eugenics Law

1907 Indiana Eugenics Law side 11907 Indiana Eugenics Law side 2
Indiana has quite a long history of discriminatory practices and they are quite proud of it too.
Tim Lahrman writes in an email:
Did you know that in the late 1800’s early 1900’s the professional title of today’s “mental health” professional was — the “alienist” — and in fact the New York State Board of Alienists screened every immigrant entering this country through Ellis Island —
(source:  1906  Charities and the Commons: A Weekly Journal of Philanthropy and Social Advance, Volume 15 published by Committee of the New York Charity Organization Society)
 Buck v. Bell is not dead.
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The decision was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating “defectives” from the gene pool. The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell.
No one cares from the State of Indiana that they guardianized a perfectly competent, lucid, thinking, kind and caring person (Tim often writes briefs as well or better than most licensed attorneys).  Then they fleeced him of millions.
Likewise the Illinois ARDC does not seem to care that what Lanre Amu said was true about certain judges and when investigated, the mega Chicago Business media agreed and published articles.
The ARDC does not apologize or restore his law license.  Jerome Larkin, the head Administrator, and Mr. James Grogin, chief in house counsel are the perpetrators.
In long history in the US of discriminating against persons that are melanin enriched in the skin, the Dredd Scott case lives on in Illinois and with the ARDC.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court,[2][3] and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the Court denied Scott’s request. For only the second time to that point in its history, the Supreme Court ruled an Act of Congress to be unconstitutional.[4]
If you don’t know your history, you are doomed, not only to repeat it, but live in it.  The actions of the many clouted Supreme Court individuals in Indiana keep Tim Lahrman, a perfectly competent pot smoker enslaved.  The actions of the ARDC in Illinois continue to keep Mr. Amu, a now impoverished African Immigrant ensalved and unabled to help other African Immigrants.
Please write to the Indiana and Illinois Supreme Court and send them a copy of this article.  Buck v. Bell and Dred Scott v. Sanford were the most shameful of cases in their time, and must not continue to live on in the 7th circuit.

Lets hear it for NASGA!

If anyone thinks that court watchers and blogging doesn’t help, take a look at the tied in case of Judge Colin in Florida and his wife who is a “Professional Guardian (of death)”  When NASGA and other blogs got ahold of the fact that Judge Colin was appointing HIS WIFE and passing he (and her friends) business as a Professional Guardian and vendors, all of a sudden that stopped.

Imagine that, a blog making a difference in corruption.  An NGO and concerned citizens making a difference in the courts!

Let’s hear a great hurrah to NASGA and all the court watchers that cleaned up Judge Colin’s act.

He should be kissing all their fu**y be****s right now, because this could have kept him out of club fed med.

No one wants to put people away, we want them to act with intergrity, Honesty and Justice.

Recent News, Articles, and Events

Guardianships: A Broken Trust, 115 Recusals in Six Months
His wife’s [Elizabeth Savitt] job as a professional guardian leaves Judge Colin compromised, handcuffing him from fully doing his job, The Post found. He’s recused himself from 115 cases that involve his wife’s lawyers in the last six months of 2015 after The Post started asking questions in its investigation.“When you have a judge suddenly […]
Guardianships: A Broken Trust: Judge’s History of Debt, Foreclosures, IRS Liens
Judge Colin,  Elizabeth Savitt’s husband[Judge] Colin and [Elizabeth] Savitt are positioned as the power couple of the lucrative probate arena. Colin’s financial history, however, is littered with debt, including suits for foreclosure on three properties and $65,000 once owed to the IRS for back taxes.Savitt also had a recent foreclosure on a property. The couple’s […]
Guardianships: A Broken Trust: How Do You Convince a God He’s Wrong?
The nation as a whole is beset by unscrupulous guardians, some of whom have been charged with crimes. Florida passed its first effort at reform last legislative session, including applying criminal penalties to guardians found guilty of abuse. Advocates say legislative reform, though, means nothing if judges are complicit in draining the life savings of […]

From Ken Ditkowsky–Probate reform super hero

Probate Reform Hero

We’ve heard, but have not verified the accusation that Mr. Jerome Larkin has some sort of financial relationship with the Attorney that journalist Gloria Sykes wrote to the IARDC complaining.     Of course as Larkin does not file the ETHICS STATEMENT that is required of all persons receiving remuneration in the form of salary from public offices of the State of Illinois such remains a secret.   So much for ethics at the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

TO:  The ARDC Illinois
RE: Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig of Fischel & Kahn
To Whom It May Concern,
Yesterday, February 17, 2012, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig stood before a federal bankruptcy judge, (Pamela Hollis) and LIED.  This is not the first time she (and her colleague of Fischel & Kahn–Peter Schmeidel) misrepresented the facts to a FEDERAL JUDGE, or even a STATE JUDGE, but this time she did it with vindictive retaliation in order to further ‘bully’ me and dispossess me from not only my property “Homestead”, but also all property of my bankruptcy estate and procure a favorable ruling in order for her to have a huge financial gain.  It is a matter of fact that:
(1)  Deborah Soehlig will NOT get paid one penny for her unethical and lawlessness services provided to her client Carolyn Toerpe, the Plenary Guardian, unless she successfully does me great harm (renders me penniless and homeless in order to silence me);
(2)  Deborah Soehlig is giving Carolyn Toerpe legal advice on how to financially exploit, willfully deprive, and otherwise, perpetrate egregious and deadly elder abuses against my mother, Mary G. Sykes,
(3) Deborah Soehlig knows she is before a Federal Judge without standing: that she or her client, are not “creditors” and she is wilfully interfering and abusing me in a proceeding that she does not belong involved in;
(4) Deborah Soehlig knows or should know the law(s) and the Bankruptcy Codes and the Rules of procedure, but still, she pretended that she had me served notice regarding her Motion to Adopt she (allegedly) filed with the U. S. District Court in re the Estate of Gloria Jean Sykes, when in fact I was never properly served and the Affiant lied;
(5) Deborah Soehlig knows or should know that her client is a ‘fraud’ and that there is but a “Naked Trust” or the trust property was improperly claimed in the Mary G. Sykes Trust rendering it thereby invalid, and that her client has no right to possession of the property at 6014 N. Avondale (“Subject Property” or “Homestead”) in whole or in part: that said, Deborah Soehlig knows or should know that the illegal and wrongful eviction perpetrated against me dictated that I be dispossessed of the second floor only and that her client LIED to the Deputy Sheriff, creating false statements against me, in order to have me forcibly removed from the entire Subject Property against my will or consent.  Deborah Jo Soehlig knows or should know that the Sheriff placed their purportedly legal sticker of dispossession on the second floor but that her client changed the locks on the first floor in order to dispossess me of the entire premises–an action which was false and unwarranted under the allegedly proper court order the Sheriff had attained color of authority thereunder.
Attorney, Deborah Jo. Soehlig, not unlike her ethically challenged colleague attorney Peter Schmiedel, have violated the same codes of ethics and professionalism and so the ARDC only need to refer to my numerous prior complaints against attorney Peter Schmiedel to pursue their investigation.  Deborah Jo Soehlig knowingly has committed serious torts and criminal acts no less than that amounting to acts of civil terrorism against both my mother and I for her own greed and financial gain, and she told me yesterday that she will “dictate when or if I get my personal property, my tools of the trade and intellectual property,  and or any of my confidential legal documents– including evidence much needed to prevail in the Federal Cases”, back into my possession. She LIED to the federal judge yesterday when she knows that the Order of October 25, 2012 is being appealed and that the court lacked jurisdiction to address that order — and yet, Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig created the false and improper illusion that I was a “dangerous” person and her client was “in need of protection” and therefore a security company was hired to protect Carolyn Toerpe and Toerpe’s property at the Subject Property.  Deborah Soehlig knows that none of the property currently housed at 6014 N. Avondale belongs to her client, or has ever in fact belonged to her client.
I have submitted numerous claims and requested protection under the ARDC’s Client Protection Program and I have been repeatedly denied. The loss of the properties of my estate, the egregious lies  narrated by attorney(s) such as Deborah Jo Soehlig have caused me (1) loss of money and property as a result of the intentional dishonest statement by attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig;
(2) that Deborah Jo Soehlig has wrongfully misappropriated or converted, is using, and withholding my money and my property;
(3) that these loses occurred while Deborah Jo Soehlig was acting as Carolyn Toerpe’s lawyer and in a fiduciary capacity related to the practice of law (attorney for the alleged Plenary Guardian of the Estate of Mary G. Sykes);
(4) that because of the huge losses of property, income, et. al, due to Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig’s deliberate fraud on the court which she perpetrated in several court proceedings, she must be investigated and disbarred, or at least suspended;
(5) that I have made reasonable efforts to pursue civil remedies and as late as yesterday, in motioning the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for a Rule to Show Cause based upon numerous misrepresentations, half truths and even outright lies, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig, after court in the hall when I once again attempted to “work things out” and “set up a cooperative time to procure my properties while we work out the adversary proceedings– the Appeal, the ADA claim and the section 2-1401 that her client will be served today or tomorrow by the DuPage County Sheriff’s office–she has REFUSED TO OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE OR REASONABLE COOPERATION WITH THE INTENT TO BULLY ME, TO CAUSE ME MUCH PAIN AND SUFFERING in an attempt to silence me!
My losses have been massive since Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig first became involved in these court proceedings relating to the Estate of Mary G. Sykes and these losses are due in full to her negligence, her lack of reasonable investigation into the facts and affidavits previously placed on file with the ARDC and posted on this blog,  and her gross malpractice (rather than intentional dishonesty).
Some of those losses (financial and emotional), occurred because she and her client is not in fact an ‘creditor’ of my Estate in Bankruptcy.  Rather, because she is falsely parading around in the Bankruptcy court as such, my claim is for lost profits, consequential damages, and costs to recover my personal, professional, and legal litigation properties. (Deborah Jo Soehlig has and continues to obstruct justice and she further instructs and advises her client on how to obstruct justice as well, inter alia).
To ignore the egregious and wrongful conduct of Deborah Jo Soehlig, who has LIED on motions filed, verbally LIED to state and federal court judges (the transcripts of proceedings where she has appeared are replete with such lies) and yesterday, she lied again to Judge Hollis in order to influence a Judge and discredit me for her own financial gain.  Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig’s motivation is simple: greed and money!  She made an agreement with her client Carolyn Toerpe that the only way she will get paid is if she does me great harm, renders me penniless and homeless, and in doing so, illegally sells my mother’s home (and forces the sale of my home — “No, hell no I won’t let her do that and neither should the ARDC”), for her own personal financial gain.
You can easily check on all of these facts.  Deborah Jo Soehlig cannot prove or show that she has been paid for her services over the past two years she’s represented Carolyn Toerpe.  Her and her firm are waiting to sell the Subject Property and my home as well (“my Homestead”) by forcing a partition proceeding when she knew or should have known that I paid for the home in full, paid the mortgage and I was the only individual residing on the premise and that this arrangement was well known by reputable (that is, most all) of my family members–not those who stand to financially gain by the sale of my Homestead.
The financial exploitation, the willful deprecation of both my mother and myself is so blatant, that even a challenged child can see the FACTS that Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig is using her position and office as an attorney, and using the courts in order to not only churn assets of our estates, but also to set a course that will ultimately ‘murder’ my mother. And inasmuch as Deborah Jo Soehlig threatened my life and livelihood yesterday outside the Courtroom of Judge Hollis in a direct pursuit of  what attorney Peter Schmiedel wrote in an email to my one time attorney Joel Brodsky, that the law firm of Fischel and Kahn will do whatever they must to render me penniless and homeless for their own benefit (to get paid).
The legal profession depends upon the public’s trust.  It’s been over two (2) years since I first filed a complaint against attorney Peter Schmiedel who appeared for the first time as Toerpe’s client on February 10, 2010 and I reported to the Probate Court that he was going to sell my mother’s home and my home too for his own financial advantage and gain.  Because the ARDC has failed to act, failed to investigate, et al, Peter Schmiedel and Deborah Jo Soehlig’s wrongful acts amounting to little more than civil terrorism, I am now homeless and penniless and without any of my personal and professional property as well as my intellectual properties needed to generate an income, and of course all my legal documents.  That said, attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig, if not stopped, she will assuredly not only instruct her client Carolyn Toerpe not just on how to murder Mary G. Sykes, but also on how to murder me as well.  You at the ARDC continue to laugh, continue to charge innocents like Kenneth Ditkowsky or JoAnne Denison, and while ignoring the obvious, you are empowering criminals wearing legal suits and carrying legal briefcases and pleadings to do great harm to the exact people and general public that you, as a oversight agency, were lawfully appointed by the State of Illinois to protect.
I am extremely fearful for my life. I fear for my mother’s life.  Meanwhile, Attorney Deborah Jo Soehlig continues to LIE to Illinois Judges in order to obtain rulings that will fill, or which may be currently filling her pockets with the hard earned money of good American citizens who have repeatedly  reached out to the ARDC pleading for basic legal protection afforded to all.
I, and I’m certain other innocents, live in fear for their lives every day because of attorneys like Deborah Jo Soehlig.
FYI I have not received any confirmation that the ARDC is dong any investigation on attorney Peter Schmiedel after so many complaints were filed against him, that it appears that this is a John Wayne Gacy situation, that the ARDC will do nothing until many die — and then, it will be simply too late.
The last words Deborah Jo Soehlig said to me yesterday as I ‘begged’ to arrange for a cooperative time for me to get my properties from the Subject Property, are “You can’t dictate to me.  We will dictate when, how, and if at all you get your property back.” She then turned on her heels and with her buddy, attorney Peter Schmiedel, simply walked away from me.  Other attorneys heard this and a couple walked up to me in shock!  Hitler is still alive and well…. is the ARDC going to allow Deborah Jo Soehlig to walk me (and my mother) into the Showers, too?
Right now, we’re both living in this Concentration Camp stage of hell on earth, and we can see not too far afield the Shower buildings which is assuredly the next step in this grisly process perpetrated with the assistance of the Schmeilig team.
Gloria Jean Sykes

The brave story of a true legal hero–Dr. Richard Fine

Dr. Fine, a California lawyer of prestiege and renown, started to battle with the California legal system over payments of bribes in staggering amounts, the withholding of child support money to women and children and other assorted issues regarding government bribes, fraud and corruption.  He was able to recapture, via litigation on behalf of the people a staggering $340+ million which belonged to the public.

So what did that win him from the State of California?  An 18 month warrantless and bondless trip to LA country jail.

Read his story here.

He is now out and running his “Center for Judicial Accountability” but his road has been long and hard.  Please pray for him and his good work to spread.

Medical Kidnapping Business: Judges Skirting the Law for Federal Funds

Retired Arizona Judge Reveals Corruption in Legal System

Who is Trying to Silence Filmmaker and Judicial Watchdog Bill Windsor, Currently Held in County Jail?

I recently was privileged to have a conversation with one of the top American legal minds of our day and age, Dr. Richard I. Fine, who lost his career and was unjustly put in prison for 18 months as a political prisoner. He was never even charged with a crime.

His story is not widely known, and it gives the public an insider perspective to the depth of the corruption in the American judiciary.

Health Impact News investigative reporter John P. Thomas recently interviewed Dr. Fine, and his report is below. Dr. Fine’s message is a message every American needs to know.

– See more at:


Dr. Richard Fine’s Experience with Corrupt Judges in California

by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

There have been many articles published on the websites of Health Impact News and Medical Kidnap which mention judicial corruption. In this article, we take an in-depth look at one man’s attempt to expose judicial corruption, and the destruction of his legal career that followed. It destroys the myth that judges are always people of integrity who seek a fair outcome for those who appear in their courtrooms.

To be fair, there are still some genuinely honest people who work in the courts. However, the presence of good people is being overshadowed by those who routinely misuse the authority that has been given to them for personal gain. Corrupt judges do not identify conflicts of interest and do not step aside from cases where their personal connections might cause them to give an unfair judgement. Corrupt judges provide advantages to those who have given them money and power, while they disregard the rights of those who seek justice for acts of wrongdoing perpetrated against them.

One Honest Attorney’s Ten Year Battle with Corruption

A ten year battle with judicial corruption cost Dr. Richard I. Fine his freedom and his license to practice law. He was not punished because he did wrong, but he was attacked because he did the right thing.

The right thing was to expose the paying of illegal money to Los Angeles County judges and other California Superior Court judges after he learned about the practice in 1999. The right thing was to use his extensive legal training and experience to confront the pattern of corruption in the California judiciary and to do battle with the system that was corrupting judicial integrity.

California Superior Court judges in Los Angeles County began to receive large amounts of money from the county every year starting in 1985. In recent years, the annual payment made to each judge was in excess of $57,000. These annual payments were in addition to the regular salary paid to the judges by the state of California. Los Angeles County officials claimed that the purpose for the payments was to attract and retain high quality people to work as judges. However, another purpose – an illegal purpose – has been revealed. [1]

Dr. Fine showed that these payments were illegal, and fostered judicial corruption among Los Angeles County judges. The payments did not attract and retain judges, rather, they became a source of corruption. A very different word can now be used to describe the intent of these payments. [2]

Judges and Court Decisions Affected by Bribe Money

Judge Striking Gavel While Holding Scale With Money

As will be explained by Dr. Fine, these payments can be called bribe money, because the decisions made by these judges followed a very predictable pattern, which benefited Los Angeles County. In cases involving the county of Los Angeles, the county almost always won the cases brought before these judges. This pattern of decision making is evidence that the payments to judges were functioning as bribes.

I had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Fine at the end of 2015. He was the first attorney to challenge the system of judicial corruption in California and the first to expose it to public view. He told me how the judges conspired to attack him and bring him down once he started to reveal the corruption.

Los Angeles judges denied him the payment of fees for work he had done. They imprisoned him for 18 months. They took his law license. Even after it was proven that corruption did in fact exist, and he did nothing wrong by exposing it, the California Supreme Court still refused to restore his license.

But before I get into more details about the betrayal of trust that Dr. Fine experienced, I want to introduce you to this remarkable man.

Dr. Richard Fine is a Man of Persistence and Courage


I spoke with Dr. Richard I. Fine, Ph.D.; JD, on December 29, 2015. The information in this article came from this conversation and from his presentations and interviews that have been archived on the internet.

Dr. Fine is a recognized leader in exposing governmental and judicial corruption. He is working hard to create a more just global society by providing expertise on issues relating to abuses of power, governance, international and comparative law, human rights and litigation oversight. Professionally, he is now working as a Strategic Consultant, and a Certified Mediator. He is the Chairman and Founder of the Campaign for Judicial Integrity, a grassroots movement dedicated to ending judicial corruption, reforming the judicial system and restoring our constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. He also is the Co-Chairperson of the Judicial Reform Committee of DivorceCorp.

The educational background of Dr. Richard I. Fine is extensive. He earned a Ph.D. in Law with a specialty in International Law from the London School of Economics and Political Science (1967). He earned a Doctor of Law (JD) degree from the University of Chicago Law School (1964). After completing his Ph.D. he obtained a Certificate of Public International Law and a Certificate of Private International Law from the Hague Academy of International Law, a Certificate of Comparative Law from the International University of Comparative Science in Luxembourg, and obtained a Higher Diploma of Comparative Law from the International Faculty for the Teaching of Comparative Law, Strasbourg, France.

Dr. Fine pursued a wide range of studies in college. His major was psychology. He had a heavy emphasis in pre-med courses and actually took more courses in economics than in his major. He also accumulated credits toward a master’s degree in labor.

The combination of his education and professional training gave him an unusually broad view of how the legal system, the political system, and the personal ambition and self-interest of leaders come together to shape the systems that manage life in our society.

Dr. Fine described himself. He stated:

I am a broad thinker. Lawyers aren’t that. Many weren’t that even when I was practicing law, because so many lawyers began developing into the specialties. Lawyers look to solve the problem within the confines of their expertise and that doesn’t necessarily solve the problem. [3]

Dr. Fine’s Outstanding Legal Career

Dr. Fine was a member of the state bar association in at least one state from 1964 through 2011. Early in his career, he worked in the U.S. Department of Justice, Anti-Trust Division. He was the founder and chief of the first municipal anti-trust division in the United States for the Los Angeles City attorney’s office. In 1974 he founded the law offices of Richard I. Fine and associates.

A few highlights of his career include: the indicting and prosecuting of General Motors and Ford for price fixing, the Investigation of the Pulp Paper and Newsprint International Cartel for international price fixing, and the representation of the Department of Justice in its first appearance before the Tariff Commission, which later became the International Trade Commission. He litigated the case of IAM versus OPEC, which was the case against OPEC nations for manipulating U.S. gas prices. He changed the way United Way functions by requiring it to allow donors to designate the charities where their donations would go. He forced local governments in California to return a billion dollars of illegally used funds to California taxpayers. He closed down the California State Government and required it to have authorization before paying anyone including the Governor, state legislators, and judges. The action he took against the State of California in 1998 regarding its spending practices ended 26 years of political budget crises.

Dr. Fine received various certificates of special recognition such as the California State Assembly Certificate of recognition, and was honored as the lawyer of the decade and champion of court reform.

From the abbreviated list of accomplishments and honors mentioned above, it is clear that Dr. Fine was, and continues to be, an outstanding advocate for justice in America.

– See more at:

From Ken Ditkowsky–massive fraud in US health care

Date:  January 23, 2016
The link that is the subject of this e-mail has many valid points, but unfortunately it misses the real reason that Obamacare – or any other health care program will fail.     In a word, no government or private program can be successful is it is replete with massive fraud.
Health care fraud is a ‘given’ when it becomes universal.      A sick person wants desperately to be cured and the lure of a magic pill or a magic cure is very inviting.    How do you know that ant dung will not cure the illness that plagues me?     Indeed, we all suffer from this problem and there is always a willing seller.
The current cadre of public officials, political elite, and ‘ant dung’ salesman package and sell to a gullible public all manner of solutions.   One of the architects of Obamacare made no bones about our collective stupidity.    We are vulnerable to official corruption and if we want health care we have to bite the bullet and stand up and counted.     This is the new civil rights struggle.
The most vulnerable members of American society are the elderly and the disabled.      The elderly with a few dollars in their jeans are attractive victims for the most venal members of our society, to wit: the corrupt lawyers, corrupt judges, and corrupt public and judicial officials.      The aforesaid corrupt lawyers, judges, public and judicial officials have at their disposal the arsenal of government to aid and abet their criminal activities.     Here in Illinois a cadre of disreputable and venal lawyers and judges have turned the Probate Division of the Circuit Court into a cesspool of exploitation and abuse of the elderly.    The elder cleansing is so imbedded that the Lawyer Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) actively, openly and notoriously engaged in 18 USCA 4, 18 USCA 371, and 18 USCA 242 conspiracies to obstruct justice and protect the miscreant legal and public officials from the Rule of Law and the Bar of Justice.
Calling for an HONEST investigation or exposing one or more of the corrupt judges or lawyers engaging in criminal activity is so frowned upon by the establishment (and in particular the IARDC and its administrator Jerome Larkin) that an attorney who exposed the criminal activity was summarily given an interim suspension and then a three year suspension upon the rationale of Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court that such exposure was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.    
The net effect was that millions of dollars garnered from the estates of disabled or infirm “wealthy” elderly goes uninventoried and is stolen from the fiduciary estates.     However, the perfidy does not end there.    Social Security payments, Medicare payments, insurance payments, trusts, pensions, other government benefits all disappear into the cesspool of guardianships.    Fixed assets soon follow and the other assets of the victim soon follow until millions of dollars of the victim’s savings and lifetime of toil find themselves in the elder cleansers pockets.     This organized and judicially approved criminal activity takes advance of not only the ward, but, government largesse making certain that limited health care funds are squandered to the greatest extent possible.
The nefariousness does not end at the water.     An elder cleansing victim is fleeced with perfection along with the public.    The corrupt judge recognizing the difficulty of further fiduciary theft and addressing the more vocal complaints of the hysterical family makes a pious judicial determination that the senior should be placed in a sheltered care facility for his/her own safety.    This facility, of course, has a reward program.   The jurist is assured that every resident of the facility will vote for his retention (or future election) and he will share in a lucrative referral commission.   (Ms. Denison’s blog reported on an open advertisement that promised such a remuneration).    An investigative reporter reported that an industrious Court appointed guardian (or guardian ad litem) could obtain as much as several thousand dollars a month for a single referral.
Once the victim is placed in the nursing home the ability to garner health care payments accelerates.  
1.   Nursing home patients are provided a full complement of pharmaceuticals (whether they need them of not).    Until recently, the operator of the nursing home just happened to have a substantial equity interest in the pharmacy.      After Omnicare was fine about $150 million dollars, it was sold to CVS pharmacy for 12.4 million dollars.  
2.    Linen Supply, nursing services, etc. are all provided by corporations that just so happen to be owned in whole or part by nursing home operator and these companies just happen to have convenient billing processes.
3.   Physician care, transportation etc. all are provided by related entities.    It has been averred that in many instances the medical supervision consists of the designated physician slowing his vehicle down to 30 MPH as he drives by the nursing home.
The foregoing is the tip of the iceberg, but it opens a window into the massive health care scandals that plague the economy and the persistent struggle of good hearted Americans to garner affordable health care.     It is suggested that many of the very political elite who scream the loudest about the lack of affordable health care are engaging in or fostering the corruption that prevents affordable health care from being a reality.  
No business can live with the reputed government contract 25% fraud surcharge, and indeed no government can live with a 700% fraud surcharge.
NB.    As to most problems involving government fraud there is no quick fix and it is very common for the problem to be swept down the road and then dealt with when is acute.     The guardianship fraud (elder cleansing) does have a quick fix.      Fortuitously, the breach of a fiduciary relationship is a taxable event.   The guardian is a fiduciary and therefore held to the highest standard of conduct and fidelity.    A fiduciary who steals a penny is in big trouble.
As the theft of penny from the ward is a serious matter, the doctrine of constructive receipt of operative and the fiduciary who steals the penny owes taxes on the entire fund that he controls the moment that he exercises control over that penny.    The benefit has to be reported on the Fiduciary’s 1040 tax return.    To not report it is tax fraud!
Pursuant to 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 the people who act in concert with the fiduciary are co-conspirators.  Co =conspirators enjoy joint and several liability – including the tax liability.    18 USCA 371 is broad in its reach and thus, the judge, the co-counsel, the nursing home operator, the doctor, pharmacist, and the lawyer disciplinary counsel who acts to ‘cover up’ the criminal activity and intimidate whistleblower lawyers all enjoy joint and several liability and have to report on their personal 1040 tax returns the total benefit – or be liable for the taxes, interest, and penalties.
A criminal indictment takes time, but, civil Federal (and in most cases State) enforcement of tax liability is rapid and decisive.    The burden of proof is on the taxpayer.   Ergo, over three million dollars was stolen from the Sykes case and a million and one half in the Gore Estate.    In the Tyler estate the booty was eight million dollars.   *****.     Making Jerome Larkin and several of his cronies at the IARDC the focus of a civil tax collection effort would effectively end the Illinois cover-up of the parochial elder cleansing emanating from the Probate Division of the Circuit Court.    To make certain that the message is received the civil enforcement should be extended to the two guardian ad litem and the co-operating judges who aided in the ‘making disappear’ sans inventory of Mary Sykes assets and the gold obtained from Alice Gore’s mouth.
The message of civil tax enforcement will provide judges with an incentive to follow the law as set forth in the Illinois Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq and in particular 755 ILCs 5/11a – 3 b.     Criminal and ultra vires actions by Judges are not protected by ANY immunity statute. 

Looks like another no jurisdiction case for the 18th floor

Names are redacted.  But I am not shocked this is still going on.

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jan 22, 2016 11:04 AM

Cc: Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , Tim NASGA , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Nasga Us , Bev Cooper , Janet Phelan , “J. Ditkowsky” , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago Tribune , “” , FOX News Network LLC , SUNTIMES , Candice Schwager , “” , Glenda Martinez , Diane Nash , Ginny Johnson , Rosanna Miller , Cook County States Attorney , Scott Evans , “Y. ACLU” , Fiduciary Watch , Edward Carter , KRISTI HOOD , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Jay Goldman
Subject: Re: Florence Peterson 2015P007361

The fact that your mother now has been appointed an attorney is step 1.   If the attorney does his job he will:
1) ascertain if there was jurisdiction over your mother.   As you were not given the 14 days notice prior to any hearing as to your mother’s competency pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/11a -10 and the Sodini case there was no jurisdiction ever obtained.   Further section 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 requires a specific form summons be served on the alleged disabled person.  If proper service was not had there is no jurisdiction.
2) ascertain if a proper inventory of your mother’s assets was made and filed.   By a proper inventory, I mean accurate inventory, not a low ball, no ball, or high ball inventory detailing all items of value.    The sale of the house is troubling!   As a fiduciary the guardian must obtain the highest and best price for the sole benefit of the ward.   IT IS NOT UNCOMMON for a friendly sale to occur.   The attorney should ascertain if such a sale occurred.
3) The placing your mother in a nursing home is also dicey  – it is not usual for the guardian to receive a ‘finder’s fee’ or ‘referral fee.’    As the profits are so enormous it is not usual for a guardian to receive several thousand dollars a month in fees.   
With Adam Stern involved in the transaction it looks like flag day!   Take nothing for granted.   Share any information that you receive with the Federal authorities.   If the appointed attorney is willing to prostitute himself to protect the elder cleansing cabal and 18 USCA 371 conspiracy you will know very soon and *******.
As to your question concerning Judge Quinn.   I’ve had two experiences with Judge Quinn.   She was the presiding judge in my Santini case – this was a partnership that had a situs in Germany and my client was duped into being the pawn in a serious money laundering scheme.   The other case was an incompetency case in which my client fell into the clutches of a nursing home and they tried to have a guardian appointed for him.(Jaycox)   In case number 1, Judge Quinn made a ruling against my client which I was not happy concerning, and in case number 2, she was judicial in every respect.   She was absolutely accommodating going the extra mile.  As an example, she sua sponte moved the hearing site to accommodate Mr. Jaycox, and when the petitioner’s witness testified on cross examination that Mr. Jaycox signed the consents for his hip repair operation immediately ended the proceeding for the appointment of a guardian.
The question you are asking me is can you rely upon Judge Quinn to protect not only your rights and that of your mother?   The answer is I do not know and no amount of googling will provide that information.    I personally like Judge Quinn even though she once ruled against my client.  She certainly has the incentive to comply with 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq., protect your mother’s civil and human rights, comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act, and follow her conscience.    I’ve forwarded your e-mails to the Justice Department, the States Attorney, the Attorney General, and Federal Law Enforcement.   The Obama Administration wants Obamacare to succeed and is aware that with the 700% fraud surcharge the program is doomed to total failure even if the scheme is 150% perfect.    However, it will succeed with bells on if they can reduce the fraud to the normal Federal 25% fraud surcharge.    
The fortuitous appearance of Adam Stern in the picture gives any Grand Jury investigation a ‘heads up!’   Judge Quinn is aware of where the bodies are buried and ****.    
I hope that I answered your question.   
Please document everything as accurately as possible.   Keep good records.   Mr. Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators are not going to be able to work their magic (of coverup) if law enforcement has a vehicle to abrogate the ‘elder cleansing’ that has polluted the Illinois courts for so long.   

From: B
To: kenneth ditkowsky <>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 7:52 AM
Subject: RE:

Mr. Ditkowsky, 

Did make court on 12/3 and a new atty was appointed to mother bt judge.  Never waved any right or agreed to anything.  Thanks.

Ps started listening to your interview with Rodger North. Good stuff.
Pss if you can google the judge Carolyn Quinn., Willis case daughter was guardian. Guardian office accused of fraud. Mother placed in nursing home and house sold.

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: ‎1/‎22/‎2016 7:13 AM

Cc: Cook County States Attorney; Edward Carter; Reporter Tribune Dr Shaw; Eric Holder; FBI- ( (; Chicago FBI; Tim NASGA; Probate Sharks; JoAnne M. Denison; Nasga Us; Bev Cooper; Janet Phelan; Matt Senator Kirk; Chicago Tribune;; FOX News Network LLC; SUNTIMES; ISBA Main Discussion Group; Fiduciary Watch; Candice Schwager;;Glenda Martinez; Diane Nash; Ginny Johnson; Rosanna Miller; Scott Evans; Y. ACLU; KRISTI HOOD; Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik; Illinois ARDC; Alyece Russell; Nancy Vallone; Tom Fields;; Cook Sheriff; Elaine Renoire; Janet Phelan; Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC; Mary Richards; Andy Ostrowski; Kathie Bakken; Jay Goldman; Robert Sarhan; Martha Jantho; Barbara Stone; Eric Blair; Kevin Pizzarello; Len Holland; John Howard Wyman;; ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession; Harry Heckert; Sylvia Rudek NASGA; Martin Kozak; Jim (; Doug Franks; 60m Cbs News; Dr. Rich Swier; Truthbetoldradio (; Dow Jones; ACLU of Illinois; Dow Jones & Company Inc.; Doug Franks; Teresa Lyles; Beverly Newman; Marti Oakley; Bettergov Info; Douglas Kinan;; Dow Jones & Company Inc.; J. Ditkowsky; Pam Zuckman NBC; The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right; DOEA INFO; Marty Prehn; Esq. Dr. Richard Cordero; AARP Inc; JoAnne M. Denison; Attorney Dr Richard Fine
Subject: Re: Florence Peterson 2015P007361

Good luck B —
When the law is on your side, have no fear – we still live in America!    Democracy is not a spectator sport!

From: kenneth ditkowsky 
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: Florence Peterson 2015P007361

The Sodini notice is jurisdictional.   All close relatives must receive notice at least 14 days prior to the hearing.  Thus, the appointment of a guardian is wrongful and must be revoked.   You can cite to the judge 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.   The case is in Re: Sodini.
Make certain that you make it very clear that you do not and did not waive the required notice.    Before you go before the judge make certain that you  read 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.  The last paragraph applies to notice to you.    Then look at the summons and make certain that your mother was also served with summons.   The summons must comply with the criteria of the statute.  The last time I looked the printed summons that the clerk of the court provided failed to meet the standard.
Then examine the file to determine if a hearing was in fact held and whether the 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3b determinations were made.
Ask for an attorney to be appointed for your mother and ask for the Attorney General and/or the States Attorney to conduct an investigation as to the procedure by which you mother was taken into custody.    This is a civil Rights matter.
Tell the judge that you have been informed that Adam Stern informed your mother that she did not have to attend the hearing (if that is in fact the accurate – it appears in your e-mail) and that you are appearing as an Americans With Disabilities advocate for your mother in the event that Stern and the guardian’s attorney suggest a lack of standing on your part.   The days of railroading senior citizens into guardianships for the personal profit of corrupt judicial officials is going to end soon.


To: kenneth ditkowsky <>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: Florence Peterson 2015P007361

Mr Ditkowsky,

Just finished the draft and I don’t I am going to make 7:30 am ride down town.  I will take el down late morning.  I attached the draft, Sir if you can give a once over I would appreciate.  An I am sure my mother too.  Yesterday was was her 78th birthday.  Keep fighting the good fight.  Thanks in advance.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:57 PM,  wrote:
Here is my phone number
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Peterson  wrote:
Dear Mr Ditkowsky,

Sitting down to write the  motion and order and motion. Found addional case law on ISBA The Public Servant March 2004 vol5, no 4   755 ILCS 5/11a-10(f); Sielbold vs Schulte, 195 Il. lApp. 3d 891(5th Dist. 1990); Wright vs. Calley,172 Ill. App. 3d 1055 (4th Dist. 1988).    Few question if you have the time please.  Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:34 PM, kenneth ditkowsky <> wrote:

From Ken Ditkowsky-more revelations about Elder Cleansings

Subject: Need for legal representation
Date: Jan 21, 2016 1:27 PM
I understand that the United State of America in reviewing the obvious frauds in the nursing home business of Morris Esformes both here in Illinois and in Florida has obtained the voluntary disclosure by Nursing home owner Sheldon Netich (sp)   The gossip is that Netich has become an opera star and has been number 1 in popularity over at the FBI.   Netich (SN) knows where the bodies are buried, including those bodies buried by ER, ND, ****.    
The net net bit about this situation is that a large part of the booty from elder cleansing will be recoverable = including the money that was redistributed by wrongful guardianships and extra judicial seizures.   In my opinion this elder cleansing scandal is the biggest fraud case in history (in terms of money stolen).   
Here in Illinois as an example, in the Sykes case approximately 3 million dollars is unaccounted for and in Gore 1.5 million dollars.   
In Helen Stone case (Dade County) is well over a million and the civil rights violations that Barbara Stone suffered at in the millions.  Pursuant to 42 USCA 1988 an award of attorney fees is available on the issues won.   The Col Smith case involves millions as does the Woodhull case.   Dr. Sam Sugar has been in contact with dozens of victims and his blog (and the good doctor himself) are leads to literally dozens of victims who have meritorious complaints that could be and should be addressed pursuant to the Civil Rights acts and the Americans with Disabilities acts.  (The usual common law actions of trespass, wrongful imprisonment, theft, breach of fiduciary relationship, accounting etc are also present and available).
THE PROBLEM is that few attorneys are willing to risk their law licenses by taking on these cases.   I requested an HONEST INVESTIGATION of the Mary Sykes case and the fact that the miscreants denied Mary all her basic and core Civil Rights.   In marched Jerome larkin and I got railroaded!    Everything averred by Larkin was repudiated in the common law record of case 09 P 4585.   The case file was of course not allowed into evidence and the subpoena quashed.   No matter, the blogs have memorialized the fact that Mary was not served with summons that complied with the act (the Sheriff finding in his records that she was not served with summons by anyone), the jurisdictional prior notifications to family members never made, and no hearing was ever held, but a guardian appointed by a judge who never made the first required determination – she just signed whatever one of the two guardian ad litem requested.
The same obfuscation of the Rule of Law is common in Florida, Illinois, Ohio, Pa, California, Arizona *****.    To date the law enforcement community has been benign and ineffective.    Lawyers who have spoken have almost uniformally been slapped down – especially in Florida. They also have been vilified!
However, I note that Dr. Sugar has been drawing blood with his revelations and his blog.   I know that with very little pressure SN will provide the Federal Law Enforcement with the intimate details of Rothner’s, Esformes’, Draiman’s **** sex lives and misdeeds.   He is so knowledgeable that he can even tell them what questions “Morrie” cheated on during his third grade math examination.   
It is only a question of time before the hammer drops and if will be once again safe once again for Florida lawyers to practice law in the Florida courts where their services are most needed – i.e. protection of the elderly and the disabled!   
Please do not get me wrong — I am not asking you to jeopardize your license and excellent reputation, I am asking you to do your Rule 11 investigation now so that when it is safe once again for lawyers who reside in Florida to practice law you will be able to accept referrals and assist aggrieved disabled people and their families get their lives back and their assets recovered.    I want to make it clear – the 18 USCA 371 conspiracy of corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, corrupt guardians and other judicial officials is protected at the highest levels of government and us “flotsam” are not going to be tolerated.   
Syth Gilman was indicted for over–charging the USA a billion dollars  – his trial has yet to be heard.   Omicare was fined over 150 million dollars (which is paid like you pay a traffic ticket.   It was sold to CVS pharmacy for 12.4 billion dollars.   ND is reported to have found a way to launder cabal money – he purchased a casino in Romania.   (Not one word in the press and law enforcement appears to be disinterested). *****
Interesting information is not only found of Dr. Sugar’s blog, but on the blogs of MARYGSYKES, Probate Sharks, NASGA, etc.    
NB.   Until the USA either starts civil income tax collection of the moves and shakers of the Florida Bar, or vigorous indictments of Esformes **** this is like Pandora’s box and could be hazardous to law licenses.    It is so touchy that my wife suggested that I find an multi-jurisdictional attorney to suggest referrals to and as you are a friend I should stay away from you as to this subject matter.  I thought about it, and then remembered that when my client (HK) got sued for racial discrimination and hired a specialist, rather than me, to represent him, I was insulted.  I was especially ‘hurt’ when the attorney for the discriminated employees called me to inform me of HK’s loss before HK came to see me.   (for the record – In the appeal to the Circuit Court I reversed the result, but that is another story)   The Elder Cleansing cases are legitimate cases and the actions of the corrupt judicial officials are actual violations of civil rights and ADA.    The fact that there are at this point few, if any, successful prosecutions is a testament to the corruption of the system and the lack of respect by government for the Rule of law.     
inline text
as attachment

From Ken Ditkowsky — Black is white and vice versa

Subject: Much ado
Date: Jan 21, 2016 11:45 AM
Government has reached a new low in the mind of the governed.   The Concept of Right is Wrong, Up is Down, Left is Right etc that is frustrating so many of us has reached new proportions.  Every time I see an article detailing some ‘elder cleansing’ situation my skin crawls and the hair on the back of my neck rises.   How can public officials (and judicial officials) do this to other human beings?
The upcoming political campaigns are exhibiting this frustration and leading us into dangerous waters.    Worse yet it is leading us away from solutions! 
The problem that we face is really quite simple.   We need the equal enforcement of the RULE OF LAW.   There is no one – not even the most admired and loved political figure – who is entitled to a pass!   The Law is applied uniformly and fairly!.
What this means is that my First Amendment Rights are protected to the same extent that Jerome Larkin’s are and if Jerome Larkin violates the law he is punished.  Ditto for me.   Going a step further, If General P is prosecuted for his handling of secret information, HC similarly has to face the same standard.   Getting to our level – when we appear in Court the Judge decides the case on the merits, not the amount of tribute that he can extract from one or more the corrupt guardians, corrupt lawyers, *****.
The danger is in the fact that some of the people screaming equal justice for all, like the promulgators of the War on the Elderly and the Disabled are not in good faith and seek the destruction of our American Way of Life to the same extent the corrupt public figures such as the corrupt judges, corrupt political figures, ***** do!    
I learned a long time ago — few of us ever get screwed by our enemies!   It is usually our friends.    I’ve made no secret that Hillary Clinton is not one of my favored people.   I ran across the following article from the Activist Post.   I do not defend Hillary, nor do I know of anything that is not true in the article; however, I am offended by the article – 

Hillary Clinton Brags About Getting A Pedophile Off The Hook

JANUARY 20, 2016
When Hillary Clinton was just beginning her career as an attorney in Fayetteville, Arkansas, she received a request to represent a 41-year-old man by the name of Thomas Alfred Taylor who had been accused of raping a 12-year-old girl whom he had allegedly lured into his car.
Clinton accepted the case, represented Taylor, and succeeded in securing a plea to a much lesser charge. Years later, Clinton was taped discussing the case (sometime between 1983-1987) and the audio contained in these tapes shocked even those who may have already maintained a hatred for a politician who may be the most openly psychopathic “leader” since Dick Cheney.
The audio tapes – obtained and released by the Washington Free Beacon revealed that, not only did Clinton use a number of technicalities and devious tricks to essentially free Taylor, she did so knowing full well that he was guilty the whole time. In fact, Clinton even went so far as to slander the victim of the case in her effort to get Taylor a lesser charge than the 30 years he was originally facing.[1][2]
These revelations came out as far back as 2014 yet Clinton continues to paint herself as a tireless advocate for women and children ever since she began her legal career.
Clinton’s comments on the rape trial were taken down during the course of unpublished interviews with Bill and Hillary conducted by reporter Roy Reed in the 1980s while Bill was governor of Arkansas.
Alana Goodman of the Washington Free Beacon sums up the details of the case as follows, along with pertinent quotes from Clinton herself. Goodman writes,
Twenty-seven-year-old Hillary Rodham had just moved to Fayetteville, and was running the University of Arkansas’ newly-formed legal aid clinic, when she received a call from prosecutor Mahlon Gibson.
“The prosecutor called me a few years ago, he said he had a guy who had been accused of rape, and the guy wanted a woman lawyer,” said Clinton in the interview. “Would I do it as a favor for him?”
The case was not easy. In the early hours of May 10, 1975, the Springdale, Arkansas police department received a call from a nearby hospital. It was treating a 12-year-old girl who said she had been raped.
The suspect was identified as Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old factory worker and friend of the girl’s family.
And though the former first lady mentioned the ethical difficulties of the case in Living History, her written account some three decades later is short on details and has a far different tone than the tapes.
“It was a fascinating case, it was a very interesting case,” Clinton says in the recording. “This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old. Course he claimed that he didn’t, and all this stuff” (LISTEN HERE).[3]
Describing the events almost a decade after they had occurred, Clinton’s struck a casual and complacent attitude toward her client and the trial for rape of a minor.
“I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she added with a laugh.
Clinton can also be heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab’s accidental destruction of DNA evidence that tied Taylor to the crime.
. . . . .
Public records provide few details of what happened on the night in question. The Washington County Sherriff’s Office, which investigated the case after the Springdale Police Department handled the initial arrest, said it was unable to provide an incident report since many records from that time were not maintained and others were destroyed in a flood.
A lengthy yet largely overlooked 2008 Newsday story focused on Clinton’s legal strategy of attacking the credibility of the 12-year-old victim.
The girl had joined Taylor and two male acquaintances, including one 15-year-old boy she had a crush on, on a late-night trip to the bowling alley, according to Newsday.
Taylor drove the group around in his truck, pouring the girl whisky and coke on the way.
The group later drove to a “weedy ravine” near the highway where Taylor raped the 12-year-old.
Around 4 a.m., the girl and her mother went to the hospital, where she was given medical tests and reported that she had been assaulted.
Taylor was arrested on May 13, 1975. The court initially appointed public defender John Barry Baker to serve as his attorney. But Taylor insisted he wanted a female lawyer.
The lawyer he would end up with: Hillary Rodham.
According to court documents, the prosecution’s case was based on testimony from the 12-year-old girl and the two male witnesses as well as on a “pair of men’s undershorts taken from the defendant herein.”[4]
Goodman then goes on to describe how Clinton went on the warpath against the 12 year-old victim. Goodman writes,
In a July 28, 1975, court affidavit, Clinton wrote that she had been informed the young girl was “emotionally unstable” and had a “tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.”
“I have also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior,” Clinton said.
Clinton said the child had “in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body” and that the girl “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”[5]
It turns out Clinton did not need to attack the girl at all and that the Prosecution would actually drop the ball or, at least drop it enough so that Clinton was able to salvage her case. Goodman writes,
“You know, what was sad about it,” Clinton told Reed, “was that the prosecutor had evidence, among which was [Taylor’s] underwear, which was bloody.”
Clinton wrote in Living History that she was able to win a plea deal for her client after she obtained forensic testimony that “cast doubt on the evidentiary value of semen and blood samples collected by the sheriff’s office.”
She did that by seizing on a missing link in the chain of evidence. According to Clinton’s interview, the prosecution lost track of its own forensic evidence after the testing was complete.
“The crime lab took the pair of underpants, neatly cut out the part that they were gonna test, tested it, came back with the result of what kind of blood it was what was mixed in with it – then sent the pants back with the hole in it to evidence,” said Clinton (LISTEN HERE). “Of course the crime lab had thrown away the piece they had cut out.”
Clinton said she got permission from the court to take the underwear to a renowned forensics expert in New York City to see if he could confirm that the evidence had been invalidated.
“The story through the grape vine was that if you could get [this investigator] interested in the case then you had the foremost expert in the world willing to testify, so maybe it came out the way you wanted it to come out,” she said.
She said the investigator examined the cut-up underwear and told her there was not enough blood left on it to test.
When Clinton returned to Arkansas, she said she gave the prosecutor a clipping of the New York forensic investigator’s “Who’s Who.”
“I handed it to Gibson, and I said, ‘Well this guy’s ready to come up from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice,’” said Clinton, breaking into laughter.
“So we were gonna plea bargain,” she continued.
When she went before Judge Cummings to present the plea, he asked her to leave the room while he interrogated her client, she said.
“I said, ‘Judge I can’t leave the room, I’m his lawyer,’” said Clinton, laughing. “He said, ‘I know but I don’t want to talk about this in front of you.’”
“So that was Maupin [Cummings], we had a lot of fun with Maupin,” Clinton added.
Reed asked what happened to the rapist.
“Oh, he plea bargained. Got him off with time served in the county jail, he’d been in the county jail for about two months,” said Clinton.[6]
Please see this video (audio recording of Clinton’s interview).
To this day, the victim still harbors resentment toward Clinton for the way she was treated. In fact, she subscribes many of the obstacles she faced in later life to the trauma caused her by Clinton’s handling of the trial.“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” she stated in an interview with the Daily Beast. “I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.”[8]
She also responded to some of Hillary’s allegations regarding the victim’s alleged questionable behavior and her previous unsubstantiated allegations. “I’ve never said that about anyone. I don’t know why she said that. I have never made false allegations. I know she was lying,” she said. “I definitely didn’t see older men. I don’t know why Hillary put that in there and it makes me plumb mad.”
One of the key anchors of American culture is the concept that Lawyers have a duty and an obligation to protect the Constitution.   Protecting the Constitution means that every person accused of a crime or even civil wrongdoing is entitled a full and absolutely fair hearing.   This means very simply that the judicial system being unhappy that Jeff Norkin is pointing out their feet of clay has to be honored rather than castigated or defamed and called the most obnoxious lawyer in Florida.   This means that JoAnne Denison’s exposure of crooked lawyers and judges is honored not deemed as akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.    This means that lawyers not only must, but are obligated to fight corrupt not only within the legal system, but in society itself.    This also means that If the Florida Bar does not make an HONEST investigation of the disclosed conflict of interest, breach of fiduciary relationship, extortion occurring openly and notoriously its executives should be criminally prosecuted and required to pay the Federal Income taxes, interest and penalties that the criminals have neglected to pay.  See Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 371.   Ditto for Jerome Larkin and his co-conspirators. 

Interesting “13th amendment” – No Lawyers in Office!

The Missing 13th Amendment: *No Lawyers Allowed In Public Office*


Written by David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date: 08/01/91

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States.

Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are

Anyone hear of this?  I have not found it on  There are only a few articles on the internet confirming it is found in old law books.  Maybe we need a trip to an old law library, to look at pre antebellum law records.


If nothing else, it is an interesting controversy.

Using the “mental health” of lawyers to disbar them

Of course, claiming someone is mentally ill when they are not is always a common tactic of corrupt governments to put someone away and discredit them when they are fine, but disclosing some skeletons that the clouted and powerful do not want to have disclosed, to wit:

To: “Paul K. Ogden” <>, ‘Cynthia Stephens’ <>, “‘JoAnne M. Denison'” <>,
Subject: Re: FYI – Re: – State bars may probe applicants’ behavior, but not mental health status, says DOJ, June 01, 2014
Date: Jan 20, 2016 3:46 PM
The probing of an attorney’s mental competency by the State Bar Association as means of intimidation, retribution, or just a garden variety assault on the First Amendment is an interesting tactic.
It is obvious that State Disciplinary Commissions do not get involved in the private affairs of attorneys without a reason.   In some instances there is a need to regulate attorneys and their behavior; however, the use of the disciplinary process for the purpose of advancing parochial interest of the political elite or the judicial elite is particularly disgusting and wrong.
Here in Illinois (and in many other States) was have a guardianship scandal in which senior citizens and disabled people are herded in guardianships so that their assets can become redistributed to corrupt elder cleaners.   (usually corrupt guardians, their attorneys, the judge, and a cadre of other elite criminals).    Here we have Jerome Larkin (the administrator of the IARDC) openly and notoriously misusing his office to prevent HONEST INVESTIGATIONS of posterboard cases such as In Re: Mary Sykes 09 P 4585. and the Alice Gore case.    In Alice Gore the miscreants harvested not only her 1.5 million dollars in savings, but the gold filling in her teeth.   In Mary Sykes, without even serving the summons or the notices required by the statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 (or the required hearing) about 3 million dollars disappeared.    Every day these events occur and attempts to garner an independent HONEST investigation are thwarted.    Attorneys who make waves are suspended from the Practice of Law.   In the case of JoAnne Denison Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 cohorts told the Supreme Court of Illinois her disclosures were akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.  She got an interim suspension coupled with a 3 year suspension.
It is time to put Larkin and all the other Larkin’s out of business.   The mental health scenario works both ways!    However, I still lean to using the Income Tax code to not only make it unhealthy and unprofitable to engage in elder cleansing scenarios (etc) but a way to rein in the assaults on America’s core values.
Most of the cover-ups are not good will gestures.   They violate 18 USCA 371 and/or 18 USCA 242.  (Also 18 USCA 4).    Therefore, the Rule of law is that the liability is joint and several.
The significance of the foregoing is that when the 1.5 million dollars disappeared in the Gore case (plus the value of the gold extracted from her teeth) and the 3 plus million dollars was redistributed in the Sykes case taxable events occurred.    Taxes became due right when the first of the money disappeared.   The conspirators who rob a bank all owe income taxes just like the fiduciary who steals from the ward.    The fiduciary who breaches his fiduciary relationship incurs  (applying the doctrine of constructive receipt)the requirement to report on his 1040 report to the Treasury all the money in the fund as taxable income  – if he repays the money, he can claim a deduction.
Larkin by his 18 USCA 371 actions to co-operate with the theft/breach of fiduciary relationship incurs joint an several relationship and should pay the taxes, interest and penalties.   If Larkin’s actions in pursuance of the 18 USCA 371 co-conspiracy were to consist of a mental examination that intimidation attempt found yield not only Larkin tax liability, but the shrink, etc.

Tests and indicators for psychopathy

I know that many of you out there often wonder, especially in court, or when you meet a new lawyer, who are these people that are so unfeeling, uncaring and kind?  How did they get in these positions of power and control?

Psychopath: a person who does not feel sympathy, empathy, love or tenderness for others, kindness toward others ,etc. They either commit crimes or are in prison or jail. They become more focused and calmer when watching violence, torture, crime, humiliation or nastiness. They may be violent or commit violent crimes, but many do not.   This may be because they don’t want to go to jail, they have “learned” this is a bad idea in the long run, but it may also be that they don’t get paid to be violent or cruel.  Most are obsessed with the bottom line.

Sociopath: a psychopath that is not violent and has learned to confirm to laws because they don’t want to go to jail or prison.  Some sociopaths claim a good nurturing upbringing kept them out of jail or prison.

Narcissist: a sociopath where everything revolves around him or her. They do not like criticism. They think they are the best, they have to have the best car, home, wife, etc. and the most money. They are unhappy when others have more. People are things to them and disposable.  Just a different version of psychopath.

This is my favorite psychopath video:

See Web MD.

What are the indicators for psychopathy?

One test is found here:

together with spot the psychopath.

what is the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath?

Psychopathy can now be determined with brain scans, MRIs and pet scans.  Before you invest in a relationship, or hire a new lawyer, you might want to ask them how they score on these tests.  Courts should publish these results.

Judge Gorcyca, IMHO (see my prior posts) seems to have problems with this in her online videos where she puts 3 young children in a detention center because they refuse to see their dad.  She has now left the bench in disgrace

My test, based on what I have personally observed at court and with judges and lawyers is here:

I fully support testing for all doctors, lawyers, judges, police, nurses and any and all licensed professionals.

Once a psychopath is diagnosed, they will not be sad or angry about the diagnosis. Psychopaths will justify their behavior that living without emotions is better because emotions cloud good business decisions and reduce the bottom line.  They call non psychopaths “emos” or “empaths” or “normies” in a derogatory fashion.

My list of psychopathic behavior I have seen in others:

Signs of psychopathy:

swearing, being rude, nasty or humiliating, showing no remorse, lying and cheating;
justifying injustices to others;
damaging someone else’s property and blaming an innocent bystander or blaming the property owner;
having a rant and telling an innocent bystander they did this to you to make you mad,
acting nice only when they want something, sex, for example, or your help with a project;
never coming back to say thank you for helping them, refusing to pay your bill;
having an out of control temper;
deliberately violating the laws for personal gain or enjoyment;
lying and gas lighting (gas lighting is where you did something wrong and then tell another person they just don’t remember that right)*
drug and alcohol addictions and blaming others (you make me drink or smoke dope);
sex addictions and blaming others (you made me cheat on you);
getting drunk or high and then claiming not to remember you hurt someone or their property;
rarely saying you love someone, except when you want to get something from them;
ignoring your debts and claiming the vendor’s job wasn’t good enough, but you watched them perform the job and only objected when the bill came due;
hitting or hurting someone physically and saying it was justified;
always looking for a new scheme or con to make money fast;
growing bored with a project if it does not make money right away;
demanding money from your family and withholding love;
engaging in the silent treatment, ignoring others on purpose;
controlling, manipulative behavior to gain power in a relationship, get money;
ruining holidays or making them all about you, especially birthdays, Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Mother or Father’s Day;
picking on one or more persons in the family, excluding them, giving them the silent treatment, making them a pariah for no reason;
claiming someone is a drunk, a drug addict or alcoholic when they are not; this is to help the psychopath look good when they are drinking and drugging, especially
concern for objects and things over people (someone is in a car accident, the psychopath will ask how’s the car and not if anyone was hurt);
watching you work your butt off around the home or at the office and not offering to help out;
they never clean up their own messes, physically and mentally, blaming others
watching someone clean up and fix things, and then not thanking them. (Often a psychopath will say the job was not good enough or they have a “special” reason they don’t help out, often connected with money);
having sex with a person that is unconscious or asleep;
harming animals and children for pleasure;
isolating family members by saying someone isn’t good enough for family get together;
checking others text messages or emails on a regular basis to see if they’re talking about the psychopath.

Here is a great BBC series on psychopathy:




  • for example, at my ARDC trial, horrific injustices were done to the Sykes family and in particular Gloria Sykes and Kathie and Yolanda Bakken.  The psychopaths on the tribunal tried to convince the family these injustices were “sour grapes” and “too bad you lost”, never looking at the equities of the situation where Mary was guardianized without jurisdiction, her advance directives to live at home and be cared by her two daughters there was ignored, the GAL’s then took Gloria’s insurance money in addition to selling Mary’s home for pennies on the dollar (a $1 million home was appraised for $750,000 in Feb of 2012 and then sold in April of 2012 for $213,000, most of the estate money went to attorneys fees ($160,000) and nursing home fees–a place Mary said she never wanted to go, etc.  When the money ran out, Mary was narcotized to death and buried without a wake or funeral and no death announcements were allowed–more psychopathic behavior.   The psychopaths on the tribunal blamed the family “for losing” and elevated to hero status the attorneys and Judge that did this to Mary.  This is how the Illinois ARDC operates–in a bubble of psychopathy. The bottom line is all that matters, keep the money flowing to the clouted judges and attorneys, and anyone that gets in the way is “a loser.”  To the ARDC honest, caring attorneys are losers and to be silences lest the public finds out they are just a rats nest of corruption and psychopathy.


From Dr. Sugar’s AARPG blog comes dirty probate operators–Judges and family


Florida: The Judge’s wife, a frequent court-appointed guardian

Professional guardian Elizabeth Savitt, married to Judge Martin Colin, says complaints from families of double billing and sending disputes to court to run up fees are ‘frivolous’ and ‘baseless.’ (Madeline Gray / The Palm Beach Post)Professional guardian Elizabeth Savitt, married to Judge Martin Colin, says complaints from families of double billing and sending disputes to court to run up fees are ‘frivolous’ and ‘baseless.’ (Madeline Gray / The Palm Beach Post)

This is the tip of the iceberg. The guardians hire the most expensive lawyers with the most intimate knowledge of  every quirk in the law to represent them (at the ward’s expense of course) because without the lawyers having their back, the guardians would not have the “chutzpah” to attempt of this sort of malfeasance–even if your husband is a probate judge and the judge who hands you all your cases is his buddy and your close friend.

The stench emanating from Probate courtrooms all over the country, and especially in the largest and wealthiest counties in Florida is overpowering to everyone but the Judges who oversee the system and the lawyers and predatory guardians they shield from criminal prosecution.

Thanks to Fl. Sen.Nancy Detert and her determination to make a difference, the passage of SB232 marks a start towards administrative discipline for abuse, but we must go further. Anyone but a guardian who steals as much as they do would be called a criminal and prosecuted. There are already laws on the books that make elder and ward abuse a felony.

Now, State’s Attorneys must answer why a single predatory guardian or attorney has not been indicted. The Supreme Court must answer how they have failed so miserably to provide Florida with justice, protection and trustworthy courts. Chief Judges in Palm County must answer why they have allowed such an obviously improper situation to go on for many years.

There is much more work to be done and much more to uncover.

Dr. Sam Sugar
Founder, AAAPG
January 15, 2016

Reading the entire article with numerous stories (apparently Palm Springs is a hot bed of Fla. Corruption in probate).

Court watchers needed for Daiva Sanda in Chicago tomorrow

This woman is at very high risk of false arrest and false imprisonment.  Her case will be called at Room 401, 555 W. Harrison Street.  She had 2 children by one father Mark Radzowsky, who had an aresnal of weapons at his home, engaged in prostitution and drugs, and another by a Burris Cuthione who is a known mobster with a long rap sheet.  She was repeatedly beaten by both these men.

In fixed proceedings, she lost her beloved daughters Maria and Italia to these dangerous men.  I have faxed repeatedly to the agencies, but no one has helped her.  Every time she goes to court to try to get custody of these girls by a corrupt system, they throw in jail under false charges.

Daiva is feisty and from Lithuania.  If you can help her and watch court tomorrow to see if they falsely arrest her again, please do so.

Your concern and appreciate for her rights are greatly appreciated.  And if you can court watch, that would be great:

555 W. Harrison St, Chicago, Room 401, 9 am, Daiva Sandanavaviacuite.



Her videos of “court supervision” and her ex asking for $100,000 to get her daughter back.  the authorities won’t prosecute him for extortion. n The first one is where the ex asks for $100,000 and Daiva can get her daughter back.  The rest are awful court supervisors that are mean and nasty.  One even threatened to call the police in front of the child if Daiva would not instruct her friend to stop recording.  I am glad this was recorded. The court supervisor is a *****.

Sen. Dieters of Fla. and Doug Franks speak at Fla. legislature

Sen. Dieters State of Florida. To further regulate guardianships

Start at 11 min in.

Sen. Dieters State of Florida. To further regulate guardianships

Start at 11 min in.

New bill. There are abuses in the guardian system. If you are poor, we appoint a guardian for you and they help you. If you are wealthy in your own home, you may be accosted by professional guardian in your own home. You can’t imagine the complete power over an elder a professional guardian has. In Naples, etc. the wealthy areas, these professional guardians can bleed a person dry. Once you get a guardian, they are in charge of everything, they can drug you, they can charge $85 per hour to open your mail, make a doctors appointment, etc. They manage medical care and drug the elder into submission. The guardian uses the estate money to pay for a lawyer out of the estate to respond to any challenge from a ward. Once they run through your liquid assets, they will sell your home and be put in a nursing home and the guardian still gets paid from the estate.

We created a structure where private and public guardians may be regulated. The office can investigate complaints, register, discipline and remove licenses. The bill requires the investigator to report to the court. Courts may only appoint a professional guardian regulated by the agency. If the agency finds that a ward was exploited or abused, it will be reported to the court and to DFS for prosecution. It will establish a central abuse hotline. Palm Beach prosecutors have recaptured over $4 million and a few people were put in jail.

Hotbeds of abuses include Naples, Palm Beach, Sarasota–all the wealthy communities,

The cost of the bill will be $800,000. There will be 6 full time positions. They amended the bill for a lower cost.

Question: provision to protect seniors from mistreatment by family members. Answer, this is covered in the bill too.

This often comes down to family feuds. These problems often occur after a intra family problem. Family members are covered because sometimes they are the abuser.

A good friend of mine is a GAL. He brought to me 2 separate instances where husbands were stealing the ss check of wife and using it for himself. The bill does not cover husband and wife.

It has come to my attention that public guardians sometimes represent 100 people and how can that be good for the ward. I have a bill to limit it to 50, but I still believe that one person can do 50 guardianships at one time. Some people say it’s a company, but I don’t agree with that either.

I’m glad you’re concerned about the issue. She does believe that sometimes agencies that are large can handle a lot of people. And some people don’t need a lot of supervision yet, they just need someone to check in periodically to make sure they are okay. Maybe weekly, maybe monthly.

AARP is there, Doug Franks is there with Ernestine Franks. He is next. 22 min into video.

My mother is Ernestine and is 94 yo. She is in Pensacola Florida. This is from Pensacola and from Maine to San Diego. There has to have something done. My mother spends $1,000 per day to stay in her home. I will see my mother on Sat and Sunday for $600. Plus the person supervising will take notes and the lawyers will review them and make more money. There was a recent WSJ article. What they did on 11-16-15, they hand picked a replacement. A guardian and trustee that was the same. This is a predatory guardianship. Think about a child predator, the elder predator is not different. They are the same. An abomination. This is a great start. We need a Nancy Dieter statute in Florida. I am proud to be next to her now. She is a self made womana nd very impressive. We need some type of language. Rules of Civil Proceeding, this one line will prevent predator guardians. This will stop these lawyers from terrorizing family members. I have 25 books to hand out on Free Ernestine. I can get more. I also have the last transcripts from the last hearing. All the evidence, a 3rd party stranger was given preference. We have some bad people. With the social media and TV the terrors are starting to be exposed. My dad served in the military for his wife to suffer thru this. She doesn’t understand why she can only see me once per month for a few hours, she doesn’t understand what is going on.

Sen. Hayes has a question. I was the person who was appointed in her advance directives. My brother thought a non family member would be best. My mother went to a clinic for a neurologist who said she had capacity. Advance directives are ignored, the statements of a MD neurologist were ignored. My brother had made a huge mistake. These people worship greed and that is not acceptable. There will be no one marching over a bridge in Selma for these people. We can’t see my mom–3 boys, except 7 times per year. Last time I spoke out in the FL state legislator, they took retaliatory action and increased her chemical restraints (zoloft) dramatically. My brother has even greater restriction, he can’t even call my mother now. I can call her.

My mom should be allowed to be free. She does not deserve this.

The chair asked if there was an appeal of all of this. Dieters and Franks replied “no.”

Description: Senate Committee Meeting held at 10:45 AM on 1/14/2016

Dieters: People think they have a will, a trust, a living trust and all the right paperwork and they are protected, but they are not. Florida should have the strongest laws in the nation to protect the elderly.


Instead of turning over records to investigators, Chicago Police want to destroy them

On Monday, the leaders of the Chicago NAACP along with Rep. La Shawn Ford called for the Chicago Police Department to retain their misconduct records, as the police unions seek to destroy the documents. Attempting to gain access to police misconduct records dating back to 1969, Rep. Ford, journalist Jamie Kalven, and University of Chicago Law School Prof. Craig Futterman have been fighting to release the files to the public instead of burning them like a furtive stack of banished books.
Chicago Police are scrambling as the feds have now been sent in to clean up their mess.
Listen to some of the horror stories:

Chicago, IL — Handcuffed to a wall inside a cell with no windows, Deanda Wilson was forced to urinate on himself after a police sergeant allegedly held a knife to his throat during an interrogation at Homan Square. Falsely charged with the manufacture and distribution of heroin, Wilson and his co-defendants were imprisoned for 15 months before a judge found them not guilty.

As the Cook County Commissioner and a state representative both call for a federal investigation into the CIA-style black site known as Homan Square, Chicago police union officials are fighting to incinerate decades of police misconduct records. Although the city, an investigative journalist, and a University of Chicago law school professor have battled in court to preserve the misconduct records, police unions argue that red-flagged officers should not be judged by their marred past.

While Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin and the Board of Commissioners prepare to address a resolution on Wednesday calling on the DOJ to expand its investigation into Homan Square, leaders of the Chicago NAACP and state Rep. La Shawn Ford are working to prevent the Chicago Police Department from destroying any police misconduct files older than five years.

“My understanding is it’s simple: don’t destroy the records. Keep them forever. In today’s time, it’s clear that we can do that,” asserted Rep. Ford. “The only people or organization that destroying the records would benefit would be the police.”

Last month, Spencer Ackerman, a reporter for The Guardian who exposed the Homan Square scandal, testified before the Cook County Commission revealing that more than 7,000 people had disappeared within the black site between August 2004 and June 2015. Instead of formally arresting suspects at Homan Square, Chicago cops are accused of shackling suspects to the wall for hours without bathroom breaks while violating their constitutional rights by threatening and beating them without the presence of an attorney.

We need to support this new call for an investigation into Homan Square before police destroy all of their records. Please tweet this article our with the hashtag #Gitmo2Chicago‬ so we can notify the country to these vile acts
Why is no one surprised at this article that another Chicago agency wants to destroy records.  In the Sykes case, we have the Naperville policy, officer Krackow who told me less than a year prior to her death to destroy my video of Mary G Sykes being competent “or else”.  We have Mary being narcotized to death with no tox screen and no autopsy.  We have the ARDC in complete denial that what I and Ken say on this blog is true, that the family of Mary G Sykes was terrorized, that Gloria was terrorized, illegally evicted, nearly lost her home, beaten during an eviction, etc.
Only a painter and the ARDC can turn black to white and white to black.

Lisa Nadig still cannot see her son after 2 years!

Source: To Whom It May Concern

Check out Lisa Nadig’s thoughts about judicial abuse of power and her case and how she could not see her son for 2 years because of two tiny  1/2″ scratches on her boy’s face no one would barely notice, but at the time, the son was having a fit because at 3 am she told him to get to bed and shut off the laptop.

She was being a good mom.

What did the Ex do?  He doctored up some gaping wound photos and went to court the next day to ambush her and got an “independent lawyer” (neither were witnesses) to say the son had his face gouged out with gaping wounds.

The police photos show otherwise–two tiny 1/2″ surface scratches.

Ex and CR keep on saying mom’s crazy, so even though she isn’t one to publish her medical records, here they are because she wants people to know it’s not her after so much lying in court and defamation:


Check out her blog and her postings, she has been thru the ringer with a lying Ex, a CR that never talks to mom and always takes dad’s side of things and a judge that never lets her speak in court (until she got an attorney to speak for her).

It’s all a mess and she still hasn’t seen her son for 2 years now!

Let’s bring back justice to Family Court.  The judges must listen to the Truth and help bring it out for all to see.

Recommended Face Book Page to join


California Advocates of Nursing Home Reform

You can sign up for their email list and like their page and follow them.

It’s my opinion that a whole lot of probate abuse would end when they stop the illegal flow of chemical restraints into nursing homes. Today, nursing homes are “locked down” to keep people there against their will, and chemical restraints flow in to keep them mellow and promote dementia at an astounding rate of 30 to 80% in the US. This has to end.

Information on Individual Nursing Home Use of Psychoactive Drugs Available Here

Through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed with the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), CANHR obtained data on each California nursing home’s use of psychoactive drugs. The information is self-reported by nursing homes to CMS via the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a uniform national assessment system for nursing home residents.

The information on each nursing home’s use of psychoactive drugs is contained in a searchable spreadsheet at the following links.

From Ken Ditkowsky–new Complaint to ARDC

Fax No. 312-565-2320    From:
Kenneth K Ditkowsky
5940 W Touhy Ave, #120
Niles, Illinois 60714
phone 312 553 1300     fax 312-553-1307
Now–suspended for 4 years in Illinois for asking for a complete, honest and thorough investigation of abusive guardianship
cases in Cook County Illinois

January 10, 2016

Date:   January 10, 2016
From:   Kenneth Ditkowsky
To:    Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
Subject:    Violation of Rule 8.3 by Jerome Larkin and the staff of the IARDC & other co-conspirators

The four Government Accounting Office Reports to Congress, citizen complaints to the IARDC, and the Court file in case 09 P 4585  In re: Mary Sykes reveals that here in Illinois certain corrupt judges, corrupt attorneys, and corrupt judicial officials have systematically been elder cleansing disabled people and senior citizens.      For instance, in the Alice Gore case, Ms. Cooper, the daughter of Ms. Gore complained that Attorney Miriam Solo engaged in a course of conduct that deprived her mother of her mother’s liberty, property and even the gold filings in her mother’s teeth.    In the Mary Sykes case it was noted that Gloria Sykes complained that Adam Stern, Judge Miriam Connors, Judge *** Stuart, Cynthia Farenga and a gang of miscreants acted in 18 USCA 371 concert to deprive both her and her mother of their liberty and property.     In the Carol Wyman[1] case, her son complained that his very competent mother was literally hauled off the street so deprive her of her marital property interests of her marriage.     This tactic was much more efficacious than the usual divorce proceeding!

Rule 8.3 and the Himmel  case make it very clear that the conduct of the corrupt attorneys, corrupt judges, and corrupt judicial officials is wrongful and a lawyer who does not participate in the reporting and prosecution of such criminal acts can and should be disbarred.
The Larkin administration of the IARDC and the horde of attorneys at the IARDC have openly and notoriously acted in violation of Rule, and statute 18 USCA 4, 18 USCA 242, 18 USCA 371, 18 USCA 1341**** acted to ‘cover up’ and intimidate citizens and attorneys from complying the Rule and the law.    In so acting the Larkin administration of the IARDC has openly and notoriously violated the Civil Rights of the attorneys that it has sought to intimidate in violation of 18 USCA 241 and 18 USCA 242.     The Larkin administration and those corrupt individuals that it has formed an illegal alliance with have openly and notoriously violated the Americans with Disabilities Act as they have intentionally and wrongfully hindered and prevented disabled citizens of the United States of America from enjoying the fruits of American society.
In the course of the nefarious and wrongful conduct, it is believed and therefore alleged upon reliable information of belief, that the Larkin administration has aided and abetted Federal and State tax evasion and pursuant to its 18 USCA 371 conspiracy itself become liable for very substantial Federal and State Income tax, interest and penalties.    The non-payment to Federal and State Income taxes is a disciplinary offense.
In support of these charges, it should be noted:
1)   That the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 reveals the following:

a.     Mary Sykes, according to the file, and communications with the Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois,  Mary Sykes was not served with summons and in particularly was not served with the summons required by 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.[2]     Such is jurisdictional

b.   The 14 days prior notification of a hearing was never provided the family members of Mary Sykes as required by 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10      (The sans evidence finding by an IARDC panel that the family had knowledge of a hearing required by statute was bogus and fraudulent as the notice had to be prior and in fact there was no hearing – such fabrication by lawyers is a disbarrable offense and is part of this complaint) – this is jurisdictional

c.    There was no hearing as to Mary Sykes’ competency.     Gloria Sykes and others have presented the IARDC with an e-mail from attorney Adam Stern pointing out that in lieu of a hearing he, the attorney for the petitioner, and Cynthia Farenga got together and determined that Mary Sykes was incompetent and Judge Connors rubber stamped an order appointing a plenary guardian.     This is jurisdictional

d.   The Gloria Sykes affidavit filed with the IARDC points out that a safety deposit box that was owned in part by Mary Sykes was drilled and approximately 1 million dollars in gold coins was removed therefrom and not a dime inventoried.    The guardian to this day has not denied the Gloria Sykes affidavit.     However, the two guardian ad litem who admit to no personal knowledge as to the contents of the safety deposit box have denied the averment.        These guardian ad litem also participated in certain other and different and what I deem to be criminal conduct perpetrated against the Estate of Mary Sykes and the person and property of Gloria Sykes.    (Judge Stuart – according to court watchers admitted in sworn testimony during the JoAnne Denison hearing – to chaining her and threatening her and her service animal with bodily harm so as the obtain information as to where Gloria had deposited her personal funds).[3]

e.    Other and different offenses previously submitted by family and friends of Mary Sykes and the undersigned and now incorporated by reference and made part hereof as if set forth in detail.

As the offenses committed by the miscreant and perfidious lawyers and judges have been detailed in prior e-mails and communications to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission the prior e-mails and communications from the undersigned, Attorney JoAnne Denision, and the families of the elder cleansing victims are therefore incorporated by reference and made part hereof as if set forth in detail.     However, it  appears that one aspect of the alleged criminal conduct of Mr. Larkin, Ms. Black the staff of the IARDC, Judge Connors, Judge Stuart, Ms. Farenga, Mr. Stern, Mr. Schmiedel, Ms. Solo ***** that has not been addressed is the breach of the oath each lawyer took. [4]
Every lawyer upon being sworn in by the Supreme Court of Illinois into the practice of law is required to take an oath to defend the Constitution of the State of Illinois and the United States of America.    This oath is not a formality – it is serious business.
Pursuant to Rule 8.3 it should be noted that in an effort to subvert the oath and the effect thereof as to the cover-up of the elder cleansing scandal (and overt violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act) Rule 8.2 et al are being used to attempt to intimidate and silence attorney compliance with their oath and in particular their obligations of citizenship.     The most obnoxious and odorous incident is found in the JoAnne Denison kangaroo disciplinary proceedings, to wit:    the Larkin conspirators actually claimed that the MaryGSykes blog exposing pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and Rule 8.3 the criminal conspiracy of judicial and lawyer corruption was deemed as akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.
This document and letter of complaint is a formal ethics complaint seeking an HONEST investigation and the appropriate legal sanction to be imposed against any judicial official, judge, or lawyer who attorned to otherwise participated in any disciplinary action that might have been had or sought in relation to the exercise of Free Speech by Attorney JoAnne Denison.

Basis of supplemental Complaint against the Larkin 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 371 conspirators based upon violation of oath as an attorney:

The JoAnne Denison disciplinary proceeding characterized by the Larkin Conspirators as being equitable to crying fire in a crowded theater is particularly serious as every lawyer recognizes that as an American citizen he is bound by the Rule of Law.      This Rule of Law is not a suggestion but the living and breathing manifestation of the core values of America.     A citizen whether a lawyer or a judge has an absolute duty to comply with this law whether or not he/she agrees with it[5].
In recent years SCOTUS has entered rulings making it very clear that Americans enjoy the full spectrum of First Amendment Rights and Privileges and in particular that content related speech cannot be regulated by government or the judiciary directly or indirectly.   United States v Alvarez, 132 US. Ct 537, Brown v Entm’t Merchants Asss’n 13 S. Ct 2729, Ashcroft v ACLU 124 Sc.D.  2783, Snyder v. Phelps 131 S. Ct 1207, Citizens United V FEC 13) S. Ct 876, McCutcheon v FEC 2014 WL 1301866.       It is respectfully submitted that the aforesaid cases and their holdings are the LAW OF THE LAND and the RULE OF LAW.     This SCOTUS determined in Direct TV Inc vs. Imburgia   ___ S Ct _____, decided December 14, 2015 case 14 – 465 that certain State Courts ignore the Rule of Law as determined by this Court.    In the Direct TV case SCOTUS noted that its decisions are not advisory or suggestions, but are intended to be the Rule of Law and binding of the States of the Union.
As lawyers, the Larkin conspirators, are using public funds for a parochial purpose that is clearly illegal – i.e. the cover=up of elder cleansing and clear violations of the law by the guardian ad litem in the Gore case, the two guardian ad litem in the Sykes, the attorneys involved in these cases, and staff members of the IARDC and certain members of the judiciary.      The attempt to silence Ms. Denison, Mr. Amu, myself and others is not only a violation of the First, fifth, and 14th Amendments, but a clear violation of the oath as an attorney by the Larkin conspirators and not only must be the subject of an independent and Honest investigation but the subject of appropriate punishment of the ethically challenged corrupt attorneys employed at public expense.       Such conduct is intolerable and unacceptable.
It should be noted that the practice of the Larkin conspirators in intentionally misrepresenting ruling of the SCOTUS in briefs, decisions, and other documents is not only infamous, but a breach of the oath of an attorney.    For instance, in documents in the Denison case the Larkin conspirators claim the authority of the Alvaraz case well knowing that the very grounds that the IARDC cited the case for were rejected by the majority opinion.     Such practices are reprehensible and contemptuous.       The fact that the Illinois Supreme Court justices did not admonish the Larkin IARDC conspirators for the outrage and the legal profession is silent is intolerable and wrong.    It is no wonder that so little respect is demonstrated for the 2nd oldest profession[6].

Respectfully Submitted,

Kenneth K. Ditkowsky

[1] Ms Wyman, who a judge adjudicated as incompetent after she escaped the State of Illinois guardianship elder cleansing mill,  had a career wherein she was able to accomplish exactly the acts that the Court in its kangaroo proceedings determined that she was incapable of performing.    The elder cleansing is openly and notoriously being promulgated by corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, and corrupt public officials in defiance of law.   The requirement of clear and convincing evidence has been subverted to mean – if you have the clout, no other evidence is necessary.    In Larkin promulgated disciplinary proceedings his clairvoyance is sufficient to meet the standard of clear and convincing and the Rule of law is what he says it is!      Unfortunately, Larkin’s administration is widely copied in many states such as Florida, Arizona, California, Ohio, *****.      For this reason this complaint is filed with the Department of Justice and Federal Law Enforcement.    Copies are also forwarded to news media outlets so that when the RULE OF LAW is re-established here in America for all citizens Larkin and his co-conspirators will not be able to claim surprise!      The Florida Bar as an example will no longer be able to hide behind ‘name calling’ such as:  “Jeffery Norkin is ****”
[2] It appears that the Clerk of the Circuit Court did not have printed a summons that was required by 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.      This fact does not bother the Larkin conspirators or the Court.     In her deposition Justice Connors pointed out that if someone had pointed out the jurisdictional problem she would have terminated the hearings and required the correction to be made – however, she would have reached the same result.     This admission is found at pages 90- 93.
[3] It should be noted that breach of a fiduciary relationship is a taxable event.    An 18 USCA 371 co-conspirator has joint and several liability for the event and therefore must report to the taxing authorities the benefit on his/her 1040 tax form.    As the fund breached is under the control of the conspirators the entire fund must be reported as income pursuant to the doctrine of ‘constructive receipt!’      Thus, each of the Larkin cadre of 371 co-conspirators owes the taxes, interest and penalties from day one.     This non-payment is a serious ethical and legal offense.  Pursuant to Rule 8.3 I am reporting this unethical and legal breach as it applies to each of corrupt lawyers, judges and judicial people including Jerome Larkin and the participants in the Ditkowsky and Denison kangaroo disciplinary proceedings.     (It should be noted – no one had a gun to the head of the participants and at all stages in the proceedings the affidavit of Gloria Sykes et al was part of the pleadings and record)
[4] A real concern is the doctoring of the record that was noted in the Denison case.    Judge Stuart on direct examination made one positive statement, and on cross totally contradicted herself and admitted to the intentional mis-statement.    Court watchers reported alleged perjury; however, the transcript of proceedings offuscaded and removed the conflict.     Other tampering has also been noted.
[5] An individual citizen under the Bill of Rights can reject a law, but, he or she might be subject to criminal penalties for such violation.    Public officials have no such discretion.     Individuals who disobey the can be and are punished in accordance with the law.   Thus, even though it might be inconvenient, a reasonable accommodation to an American who has a disability is required by government and persons holding themselves out as servicing the public.   Ergo, blind people and other disabled persons are entitled to enjoy the company of service animals.    The failure to tolerate a reasonable accommodation cannot be prevented, but a fine or other punishment can be and is usually imposed by law enforcement.
[6] This essay is intended as a formal complaint against Jerome Larkin, Judge Connors, Judge Stuart, and all the lawyers and judges who have acted in concert to cover-up this elder cleansing scandal and deny lawyers such as myself, Ms. Denison, Mr. Amu **** of our First Amendment Rights and the Rights to Free Speech pursuant to the Constitution of the State of Illinois.     Senior citizens are dying out there from the felonies of elder cleansing as corrupt lawyers, judges and political (public) officials officiate.     A communication called a ‘blog’ is identified as being the functional equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theater when it exposes serious criminal activity committed by judges, lawyers, judicial officials and public officials AND PUNISHED BY A LONG AND UNJUSTIFIED SUSPENSION OF THE BOGGER’S LAW LICENSE.       Democracy is not a spectator sport, and unless immediate remedial action is taken our collective legacy will be the loss of America.

Ken Ditkowsky