2) Therapists. We always have a need for trained therapists to work with our clients who have been emotionally abused and damaged by courts lacking ethics, integrity and honesty. If you are a licensed therapist, please contact me because we are in urgent need of free therapy for some of our members. Therapists should be experienced in PTLD or Post Traumatic Litigation Disorder.
3) Office Space. While I have a very kind lawyer who has donated desk space to me for the current time, we are looking for reasonable or low cost office space near the courts.
4) Volunteer Lawyers and law clerks. We are looking for a system of volunteer lawyers and law clerks that can work on and research and write briefs, memoranda and opinions on probate law and human and civil rights.
Your assistance is greatly appreciate.
In the below case, a police officer is put on administrative leave after witnessing another officer beat and choke a suspect. The whistleblower sued in Federal Court to get his job back. The 9th circuit denied his Petition to appeal. The city has not decided whether to reinstate him on his job.
Despite plenty of state and federal laws to protect whistleblowers, they are still often victimized by the system.
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 26, 2014 6:45 PM
To: Tim NASGA , Kathie Bakken , John Howard Wyman , NASGA , probate sharks , scott evans , Jo Anne M Denison
Subject: Re: Next step – Save Mary Sykes!
I am NOT in agreement at all that Ms. Farenga can copy hundreds of pages of my blog ostensibly in an effort to “report me” to the IARDC for an investigation, when she is involved in a case 1) without jurisdiction–no evidence of service of summons or complaint upon Mary; 2) an improperly issued TRO that has lasted for 150+ ten day periods; 3) comingling of an estate with a trust where the trust held Mary’s home but the estate paid the mortgage; 4) an (unfair and grossly overreaching) attack on a settlement (Lumberman’s) which clearly belonged to Gloria for her home to be rebuilt and now it lies in waste and she is homeless and penniless whereas before Dec 7, 2009 Gloria had in excess of $250k in assets at her disposale; 5) cuffing Gloria to find out where these assets were and freeze them; 6) conveniently PS asserts he is owed over $200k in legal fees; the isolation of Mary from over half her friends and family; 7) placing her in a nursing home without court order; 8) no bond on the TRO….. you get the picture.
I have the right to say those things. Fair use is only a handful of sentences within a paragraph and for research, educational and non commercial purposes, not pages and pages of downloading and copying to “report someone” with reams of text that is clearly mundane and innocuous. I would not recommend doing that to anyone, as an IP lawyer. Only take what you need and leave the rest. If you don’t, you clearly risk suit for infringement.
But the IARDC comes after myself and Ken for calling for an investigation. Writing the authorities (so you can see that SOME attorneys are honest and care about justice and ethics) and we show you how to do this.
The IARDC claims calling for an investigation of a highly troubled case is unethical and is “overly critical” of some golden boy and girl attorneys.
I still see attorneys going into Judge Stuart’s private areas–despite the Greylord orders prohibiting that.
We call for an investigation, we are investigate and they want this blog shut down.
The miscreants violate Greylord orders not to go talk to the judges privately and cut their deals, and the IARDC looks the other way.
And you wonder why many call this the “Crook County” court system.
Ken and I are here to clean it up. To point out directly where compliance is sorely lacking. We want YOU, the public to have confidence in the court system again. We want the Greylord orders enforced. We want the IARDC to go after the miscreants and not the messengers. We have other attorneys now and a network helping us.
If you are an attorney, please write me and start your own blog about fighting for truth and justice in the courtrooms.
I will not stop unless and until I hear no more complaints about gross violations of ethics that the IARDC and the courts are ignoring.
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 23, 2014 3:21 PM
Cc: Eric Holder , Jo Anne M Denison , Cook County States Attorney , NASGA , probate sharks
Subject: Complaint against attorney Jerome larkin
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 22, 2014 5:47 AM
To: Jo Anne M Denison , Harry Heckert , Lawrence Hyman , Don Johnson
Cc: “ACLU@ACLU.ORG” , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “IllinoisLawyerNow@isba.org” , “email@example.com” , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “email@example.com” , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “email@example.com” , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “email@example.com” , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk
Subject: Fw: Response to Motion
And in my usual fashion of ensuring openness and transparency to you, my reader, I will be publishing all the Pacer pleadings on this blog. We have 18 so far and I hope to have them all up in a few minutes. The suit Ken and I filed is about our civil rights. All I have done is run a blog. It should be protected by the first amendment. It is clearly political speech imploring the court system to do a better job because there are a ton of a ton of a ton of (valid) complaints out there.
Here is the current drive:
And I will add to it often as possible.
Transparency and accountability.
I can hardly wait for discovery to open. I have a ton of a ton of questions about the IARDC. For example, how is it that JL is sued personally, but he has THREE attorneys working for a state agency defending him with public funds? Those funds belong to the public and not JL’s private fiefdom. Also, if you take a look at the 2012 Annual Report you will note that the IARDC apparently has some sort of slush fund of some $21 million in “investments”. What exactly are they investing in, and why isn’t this disclosed to any attorney that they call in on a disciplinary matter? Who decides what to invest in, how are they managed? Are there kickbacks we’ll never know about because the IARDC refuses to comply with the 2009 Illinois Ethics Act? I have a whole lot of questions. I have seen and smelled the fish around this one for a long time.
1) Donations of office space.
2) M.D.’s who are willing to go against the powers that be in probate and tell the truth that certain wards have ample cognitive abilities and prepare reports.
3) CPA’s who can verify accounting statements are true and accurate when miscreants are willing to lie, cheat and steal over them.
Please email me if you know of any reputable, honest M.D.’s or CPA’s willing to help and provide court testimony.
We need to band together to reintroduce honest, ethics and morality into the Probate Courts.