From the IARDC more pleadings and more rulings

Dear Readers;

After Gloria broke down and said that she did not want to provide any privileged or proprietary information, I asked the IARDC for a Protective Order, which are routinely granted, both in the TTAB and in the Federal District Courts.  Amazingly, when typically every case I’ve been involved in the parties just agree and submit an agreed Protective Order (this is actually what you are supposed to do at the TTAB), the IARDC denied the request for  a Protective Order!

This is the response from the IARDC.  In this Response Brief you will see that the ARDC never acknowledges that Gloria is a probate victim, should be given special treatment and is entitled to a Protective Order.  They go on about imaginary “violations of discovery” when in fact, this is normal and typical discovery for both sides.  If they can’t find a violation, they make one up and tell the tribunal it is true when in fact it is not.

I would be surprised by what they are doing, except when you investigate and look at their public records.  I am amazed that SCOI thinks no one knows they are fostering, aiding and abetting such an obvious CYA agency–in fact an agency that denies it is a state agency at all and when you ask them about Ethics reporting and salary publishing, they claim to be a private enterprise!

But as you know, I publish all, and I publish the truth, so look for yourself.

 

The Reponse from the IARDC:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5SGrS11J3s1OV9kRURLTGFENkE/edit?usp=sharing

The Order from the IARDC denying my (most reasonable and customary) Request for a Protective Order.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwS3pLckxKdWF1WnM/edit?usp=sharing

In dozens and dozens of cases, I have never had 1) a litigant deny the need for  a Proective Order and 2) balk at entering into one where proprietary information is involved.

If anyone can explain this, plmk because I am dumbfounded.

As the “Table of Torts” or “Table of Troubles for court”, the behavior by the Probate Court is one continuing series of events never before seen by many, many long practicing attorneys and I don’t mean this in a good way.  It’s despicable that this should happen in the US.

 

And the pleading in the IARDC proceeding are going the same way.

This is my complete ARDC pleadings drive of everything scanned in and saved.

I dedicate it’s extraordinary strangeness to the public for your review and consideration:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6FbJzwtHocweG5BcTdfZFoxR3M&usp=sharing

I will also post this link under ARDC pleadings

You will notice the IARDC does not do the same.  It does not share. It denies transparency and accountability.

 

joanne

1 thought on “From the IARDC more pleadings and more rulings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s