MaryGSykes.com

An appeal to a Floria States Attorney to protect Barbara Stone and her mother from Elder and Family Abuse by the authorities

Posted on August 28, 2014 by jmdenison

From: JoAnne M Denison[SMTP:JDENISON@SURFREE.COM]
Sent: August 28, 2014 3:56:18 PM
To: donlhorn@MiamiSAO.com; Barbara Stone; Alyece Russell;
Michael Nofsinger; Kenneth Ditkowsky [Ditkowsky Law]; Sylvia Rudek NASGA;
Ask the Dept of Justice.com
Subject: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Dear Mr Horn

I am an attorney in Illinois who writes a blog about probate cases* and I also practice our probate decision handling dozens of cases involving guardianships where family members are isolated from their loved ones and placed in locked down nursing homes and are drugged. Estates are drained by tied in attorneys and court appointed agencies who bill but do not protect or even care very much at all other than their financial renumerations.

The use of psychotropic drugs on persons over 60 and under 20 is contraindicated by the FDA and is not an FDA approved usage of those drugs. As such, any licensed physician or physician’s assistant issuing such prescriptions should be promptly reported to the appropriate disciplinary authority for their licensing abuses.

I have heard that Ms. Barbara Stone has been isolated from her mother when she in fact has made diligent efforts to protect her mother and follow Federal and State laws pertaining to Elder Abuse. I also understand that Ms. Stone’s mother was drugged without notice and authorization by her. This was a civil assault against her.

I understand that it has been reported that Barbara’s mother had to be admitted to the hospital emaciated and near death from lack of food and hydration. I have received dozens of reports of such crimes, and I am appalled by the inappropriate response of law enforcement to typically blame the good family members that report these abuses and seek to protect the elder, but instead they become the victim and are prosecuted for their attempts to protect while the miscreants are granted immunity and allowed to continue in practices that foster these situations. Such is a horrendous tragedy. Simply due to their position, power and authority, nursing homes, hospitals and other institutions are not infrequently found with starved, dehydrated elders, and then when a family member reports, the family member is banned, false protective orders are obtained–all in an effort to deflect the true criminals, the licensed professionals that allow these crimes to happen under their own roofs.

I hope that you will cease putting Barbara through this turmoil that is the result of law enforcement’s and the state attorney failure to protect her mother while granting immunity to miscreants. It is time to stop these common practices.

Barbara and her mother must be reunited immediately–without restrictions and without any supervision. To deprive an 86 woman at the end of her life the comfort of her daughter is discriminatory under federal and state laws and is an act of cruel and unusual punishment under the US and Florida Constitutions.

Sincerely,

JoAnne Denison

* my blogs are located at http://www.marygyskes.com and http://www.justice4every1.com

cc: marygsykes.com and Atty Barbara Stone
Please see the following relevant Florida statutes:

(2) “Caregiver” means a person who has been entrusted with or has assumed responsibility for the care or the property of an elderly person or disabled adult. “Caregiver” includes, but is not limited to, relatives, court-appointed or voluntary guardians, adult household members, neighbors, health care providers, and employees and volunteers of facilities as defined in subsection (7).
825.102 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties. —

(1) “Abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
(a) Intentional infliction of physical or psychological injury upon an elderly person or disabled adult;
(b) An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult; or
(c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult.

A person who knowingly or willfully abuses an elderly person or disabled adult without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) “Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult” occurs when a person:
(a) Commits aggravated battery on an elderly person or disabled adult;
(b) Willfully tortures, maliciously punishes, or willfully and unlawfully cages, an elderly person or disabled adult; or
(c) Knowingly or willfully abuses an elderly person or disabled adult and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult.

A person who commits aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3)(a) “Neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
1. A caregiver’s failure or omission to provide an elderly person or disabled adult with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the elderly person’s or disabled adult’s physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2. A caregiver’s failure to make a reasonable effort to protect an elderly person or disabled adult from abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person.

825.103 Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties. —

(1) “Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
(a) Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person’s or disabled adult’s funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who:
1. Stands in a position of trust and confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2. Has a business relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult;
(b) Obtaining or using, endeavoring to obtain or use, or conspiring with another to obtain or use an elderly person’s or disabled adult’s funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who knows or reasonably should know that the elderly person or disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent; or
(c) Breach of a fiduciary duty to an elderly person or disabled adult by the person’s guardian or agent under a power of attorney which results in an unauthorized appropriation, sale, or transfer of property.
(2)(a) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $20,000 or more, but less than $100,000, the offender commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult is valued at less than $20,000, the offender commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History. — s. 4, ch. 95-158; s. 5, ch. 96-322; s. 1, ch. 97-78; s. 29, ch. 2009-223.

JoAnne Denison, Executive Director
Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 28, 2014 4:24 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , “donlhorn@miamisao.com” , BILL DITKOWSKY , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com”
Subject: Re: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother

Tim sent me the following which indicates that Congress also made a strong statement in enacting ADA, to wit:

42 U.S. Code § 12101 – Findings and purpose

Current through Pub. L. 113-142, except 128. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

(a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(b) Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter—

(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(2) to provide clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(3) to ensure that the Federal Government plays a central role in enforcing the standards established in this chapter on behalf of individuals with disabilities; and

It therefore follows that the State officials who are not following their statutes and ADA are flirting with some very serious problems = including jail time. The refusal of lawyer disciplinary commissions to honor the mandate of the United STates of America and local law enforcement to not pro=actively protect the disabled and their families is of very serious concern.

I am under the impression that Mr. Horn in the Stone case is a new broom. We know that Mr. Coleman is the newly elected President of the Florida Bar. Thus, both are blessed with a fresh start and the ability to make things right in the Stone case. It is too late in some of the other cases;however, we have to start somewhere. With a grand jury acting on health care fraud in South Florida it is an ideal time to clamp down on this guardianship fraud.

In Illinois and in the other states wherein elder cleansing is spreading it cancerous venom a strong response is also called for. Mr. Jerome Larkin’s ARDC alteration of the transcripts of Judge Stuart’s testimony is a starting point. The sudden demonstrable wealth of the guardian in the Sykes case is another starting point. There can be no justification for the conduct of the guardians in the Illinois cases – what benefit was there to the Estate of Gore by the prospecting for Gold in the teeth of Alice Gore? There is similarly no justification for Larkin’s assault on the First Amendment.

Ken Ditkowsky

From Ken Ditkowsky — Bill of Elder Rights for Floridians is excellent statutory detail

Posted on August 27, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 27, 2014 12:40 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , SUNTIMES , Tim NASGA , “FBI- ( (” , Cook County States Attorney , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Cook Sheriff , Bev Cooper , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , “Chicagotonight (” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Fiduciary Watch , “Jim (” , Martin Kozak , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Human Rights Watch , The Wall Street Journal , “info@bettergov.org” , “information@iardc.org” , “information@elderaffairs.org”
Cc: Tim Lahrman , The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right <3d@mail.americanbar.org>, “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Martha Jantho
Subject: Fw: Fw: WestlawNext – Busse v. Motorola, Inc.

Following through on yesterday’s memorandum, it is important to note that when you examine the statutes it is clear that they are consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Thus, Mr. Lahrman is 100% correct in his analysis.

The tort of outrageous intrusion provides a cause of action that is available to the aggrieved. As I have a right to the companionship of my spouse, my brother, my mother et al, I have standing! As Tim Lahrman has pointed out there is no immunity under ADA. Thus, as an example, Jerome Larkin is ‘naked’ as to such an action – just as he is naked as to any immunity to aid and abet the felonies of elder cleansing.

I am impressed with the detail of the Florida Statute:

(1) A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: [1]

(a) To have an annual review of the guardianship report and plan.

(b) To have continuing review of the need for restriction of his or her rights.

(d) To be treated humanely, with dignity and respect, and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

(e) To have a qualified guardian.

(f) To remain as independent as possible, including having his or her preference as to place and standard of living honored, either as he or she expressed or demonstrated his or her preference prior to the determination of his or her incapacity or as he or she currently expresses his or her preference, insofar as such request is reasonable.

(g) To be properly educated.

(h) To receive prudent financial management for his or her property and to be informed how his or her property is being managed, if he or she has lost the right to manage property [2] .

(i) To receive services and rehabilitation necessary to maximize the quality of life.

(j) To be free from discrimination because of his or her incapacity.

(k) To have access to the courts.

(l) To counsel.

(m) To receive visitors and communicate with others. [3]

(n) To notice of all proceedings related to determination of capacity and guardianship, unless the court finds the incapacitated person lacks the ability to comprehend the notice.

(o) To privacy.

[1] This retention of Rights is important as it is consistent with ADA, the uniform act and the State of Illinois Act. 1(d) is the most important as essentially it means that a disabled person is not prey! It incorporates the provision of Americans with Disabilities. Section 1(f) is more specific in incorporating ADA as it changes the standard from “best interests” to the preference of the disabled person.

[2] This second recognizes that not every guardianship gives the guardian carte blanc to the life savings of the victim. It is only in the situation wherein the individual cannot manage his/her money. Exactly what this means is left open. It does not mean that the guardian is to be presumed to be more capable than the presumed incompetent. In point of fact, the standard of competency is not very high.

[3] Isolation of the ward is prohibited – this is the most ignored portion of the act. The guardians and the Court universally separate the ward from family and friends.

This is not Einstein stuff! Florida has laid bare the Law of the Land and its legislature’s attempt to comply with the basic values of America. Like our Jerome Larkin, many in the judiciary have chosen to ignore the obvious protections for their own pecuniary benefits. (I make the assumption of pecuniary benefit based upon the fact that Larkin appears not to have filed the ethical disclosures required by statute and his continued proactive assault on the First Amendment).

What is interesting is the loyalty that Larkin exhibits to the miscreants. At this point in time he is well aware that the jig is up! Miriam Solo’s alleged role in the mining of Alice Gore’s teeth cannot be ‘covered up’ any more. Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel’s role in the wrongful conduct conducted in Judge Stuart’s courtroom (intimidation of Gloria Sykes by chaining her and threatening her) no longer can be sweep under the rug. Judge Stuart admission under oath whether wrongfully purged from the transcript or not is still of record and was heard by onlookers! Thus, Larkin is certainly aware that the rope is tightening. All he had to do a few months ago was to do the job he was hired to do and he would escape! However, like a suicide bomber, Larkin continues his assault on the First Amendment and in particular the Bill of Rights! Why?

It would have been easy to dismiss his prosecution of JoAnne Dennison. Win lose or draw 47 USCA 230 cannot be ignored, nor can the SCOTHUS decisions! At some point in time law enforcement will have the courage to indict Larkin! Even Larkin’s clout will not be enough to protect him – unless the clout wishes to share a jail cell!

Thus – why is he so pro=active!!!!

The answer to question will become evident very soon.

Our focus however is not Larkin or his counterparts – our focus is the senior who has been railroaded and had his/her liberty, human and civil rights forfeited by our miscreant nazi captors. If we get the information as to the felonies to law enforcement we stand a good chance of prosecution of the miscreants. Health care fraud is killing all health care reform including insurance. At 70% plus even the most inept bureaucrat has to recognize this fact! Thus nursing homes, hospice facilities, guardianship, and suppliers of health care products have to obtain religion. The religious training will have to be by force as voluntary measures have failed. Our current president has staked his legacy on health care, and unless he wants his administration to be an embarrassment the Administration has to forthwith start the prosecution of people such as Larkin!

Providing the law enforcement people with accurate and concise information as to the miscreant activities means a tax revenue windfall for not only the Federal government but the State government. Let’s look at Carolyn Troepe. Prior to her wrongful (lack of jurisdiction) appointment as Mary Sykes’ guardian she and her chronically unemployed husband were insolvent. Today, they host expensive parties, have made substantial improvements to their home, and Ms. T sports very very expensive jewelry. Adam Stern sports a 60,000 dollar Federal Tax lien. Mary’s substantial estate has been reduced to virtually zero! How much Jerome Larkin, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel et al have received from the Estate is unknown. Whatever they received is taxable income! A similar scenario is present in every one the cases. In Gore it is 1.5 million. In Tyler it is eight million, etc., etc.

The only logical reason that I can up with for these fiduciaries to be so resistant to the Statutes, and their obligations to the disabled person is that the amount of money to be gained is so great that ******.

IN THE EVENT THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT is also not interested in doing its job we may have to go to Court ourselves. Attached is information on one of the causes of action that we should consider. HOWEVER at this point in time lets keep law enforcement appraised and keep demanding that they end the American gulag and put an end to the 9/11 attack on American values augmented by people such as Jerome Larkin, et al.

Ken Ditkowsky

http://drrichswier.com/2014/02/14/free-marie-winkelman-pray-for-justice-now/

From Barbara Stone–a lawyer/probate victim in Florida under house arrest–merely for protecting her mother

Posted on August 26, 2014 by jmdenison

From: Barbara Stone
Sent: Aug 26, 2014 12:15 AM
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky , “joanne@justice4every1.com” , Janet Phelan , Eric Holder , Human Rights Watch , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Probate Sharks , “J. Ditkowsky” , Harry Heckert , Matt Senator Kirk , ISBA Main Discussion Group , etc.
Subject: Guardianship fraud

Certain of the members of the Florida Bar use their organization as a front for their orchestrating and acting as an accomplice to cause atrocities, embezzlement and death of certain classes of citizens, the elderly, disabled and the vulnerable in a scheme operating under the guise of guardianship.

My 86 year old mother, Helen Stone is being abused, extorted and her death is being orchestrated by a criminal enterprise that operates under a guise of “guardianship”.

Federal and State Laws prohibit abuse, aggravated abuse, exploitation, embezzlement and discrimination. They prohibit murder and premeditated murder.

This lawless operation has taken human ownership of my mother. She is a chattel in their possession with less rights than a criminal.

This criminal enterprise takes the assets of their victim pre-death. This is the most byzantine of concepts. The predator attorney for a family member of course knows that once a person is placed in a guardianship, their assets will NEVER be returned to them. Like the Third Reich confiscated the assets of their victims in Nazi Germany, so is the activity of the attorneys who engage in extorting ill gotten gains .

Dr. Swier describes this treasonous conduct in his expose of the atrocities that were committed against Marie Winkleman

Once the assets of their victim get transferred to the criminal enterprise their agenda becomes shifts to the manner in which to cause the death of their prey while making it appear they are being attended and while gauging how to most effectively cause their death . It is a known fact the elderly die and deteriorate without stimulation and their loved ones in their life. The masterminds of this murderous industry employ stay away orders as the tool to effectuate the isolation. All family members except those who are participating in the premeditated death plot are vanished by the stroke of a pen from their loved one. All over the state, children are prohibited from seeing their parents. Verboten – Third Reich activities. How is it possible that children and family members are harmful to their loved ones and their loved ones are being “protected” by these mobsters? It is not possible. It is crime so heinous that EMERGENCY MEASURES ARE NEEDED.

Once isolated the victim is alone and the crimes become insidious. Committed in secrecy with no eyes. Their house becomes a house of horrors. My mother had no food. My mother was left in her bed with soiled clothes and drugged mercilessly. She was rushed by emergency to the hospital after I sent my spiritual leader to see her and he reported she was incoherent. She was diagnosed in the hospital with dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia, fractures, and other life threatening conditions. She was emaciated. She was forcibly implanted a feeding tube although she was perfectly capable of eating. She has now been forcibly taken to a lock down facility where she is chemically restrained. She was given fake dime store glasses so has constant headaches as she cannot see. Her torment is masterminded by a monster / mobster with a law license.

Web sites are prolific describing the new Third Reich.

The new atrocity is the “feeding tube” guise. This has been exposed as a deprivation of life tactic. Feeding tubes are forced on people perfectly capable of eating because it is convenient for and serves the interest of their “caretaker” who has no need to tend to them or feed them. These people are DEPRIVED OF THEIR RIGHT TO EAT AND FORCED TO UNERGO SURGERY TO IMPLANT A FEEDING TUBE. This atrocity was forced on my mother. Mrs. Schindler, Terri Schiavo’s mother has discussed this with me and others in great depth.

Guardianship is a crime against humanity. We are watching our loved ones being deprived of their life under our eyes. They are helplessly watching their own death occur. Can you imagine?

THE BAR SHOULD ACCEPT NO LESS THAN ZERO TOLERANCE – these lawyers denigrate all lawyers.

BRING MY MOTHER HOME TO ME. NOW. IMMEDIATELY. MY MOTHER IS 86 YEARS OLD. SHE IS BEING ABUSED. SHE IS BEING EXPLOITED. SHE IS BEING SUBJECTED TO ATROCITIES. SHE HAS SUFFERED ABUSES FOR A THOUSAND LIFETIMES. SHE DESERVES TO AND MUST LIVE HER REMAINING DAYS IN COMFORT AND WITH HER DAUGHER.

This is a call for the immediate disbarment of the lawyer engaged in this crime, his arrest and indictment and the arrest and indictment of the criminal enterprise.

Barbara Stone

bstone12@hotmail.com

Dearest Barbara;

My heat goes out to you. The feeding tube ruse, I agree is a game of death. Ask Bev and Ken Cooper about her beloved mother who was capable of eating, loved to eat. So what did they do? The family protested a feeding tube, so her 29 gold teeth were pulled and she was starved to death! Cold, calculated and merciless.

Our country made fun of Russia for it’s orphan children of the poor mothers who were housed cheek to jowl in rotten orphanages, hands tied above their heads or behind their backs so food could be shoved in without hands in the way. As a result, Russian orphans preferred to eat with hands above their heads or behind their backs. Americans called that cruel, all the while forcing feeding tubes down seniors that enjoyed leisurely dining with one problem– a caretaker had to help for 15 to 30 minutes. Greedy nursing home operators won’t pay for that. It’s $5,000 per month for balogny sandwiches tossed at the senior and 5 cent cups of coffee– or nothing. I hear from seniors in “retirement homes” which are paid for by medicare. It’s cereal for breakfast, a cheap sandwich for lunch and dinner. Maybe a couple of slices of cold canned deboned turkey for 2 or 3 holidays per year. That’s where the state puts them. Our OPG does it and drains estates of $300k, $500k and up, leaving seniors in these places. The OPG and probate attorneys take the money for fees and their tied in friends, and eventually the senior is left homeless and penniless. They take all the money while the senior’s social security pays for dumps to live in with sandwiches for meals.

Again, my heart goes out to you and your mother. You will both be in my hearts and prayers with 1000 angels to pray and light candles for you both too.

This has to end. Barbara, they can put you under house arrest, but they cannot silence your truth. Keep on speaking out. Don’t stop.

JoAnne

Horrendous guardianship in Florida results in a fee loss of $230k

Posted on August 26, 2014 by jmdenison

Read the below article on how a woman with tapeworms that became physically and mentally disabled fell under the Florida guardianship program and lost $250 in fees!

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2014-05-08/news/florida-guardian-elderly-fraud/

From Ken Ditkoswky–Atty Stone in Florida has been arrested for protecting her own mother

Posted on August 25, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 25, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Barbara Stone , Sam Sugar , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , “FBI- (”
Subject: Some thoughts on the Barbara Stone matter – and complaint pursuant to 18 USCA 4 to Law Enforcement.

Ms. Stone – the atrocities committed against your mother are barbaric and wrong and to be blunt, the acts of a terrorist. ISIS has more respect for the law than appears to be the situation that you face!

I have previously suggested that as attorneys and judges are involved the corrupt actions must be as a matter of law reported to not only the Florida Bar, but law enforcement pursuant to 18 USCA 4.

As I pointed out to you and Dr. Sugar yesterday the Florida Statute is very specific in protecting the rights of senior citizens and the disabled. Thus, every member of the Florida Bar is charged with the knowledge that the usurping of the Civil and Human Rights of your mother was not only wrongful but a Felony. The act of lawyers in preying on an elder vulnerable person by orchestrating the deprivation of food, medical attention and services designed to cause her death and stockpile her assets so this attorney can get sequester them is garden variety theft. The Charade of Judicial Proceedings in these elder cleansing case is so reprehensible that it warrants the most severe reprimand including disbarment and jail time.

The fabricating litigation (including quasi criminal proceedings) against you as her (your mother’s) heir is part of an ongoing scheme that discredits not only the legal profession but the State of Florida. The action labels the Florida justice system in the most derogatory terms and converts the proceedings to the worst category of national socialist gulag [1] . The Court in prosecuting you in a criminal vein for protesting the exercise of your Civil Rights is an independent violation of the law that cannot be condoned by the United States of America, the State of Florida, or any legitimate Court. I am therefore urging the FLORIDA BAR and Mr. Coleman to instanter intervene in the travesty of proceedings that you are involved and abrogate the Taliban experience that you are having in Florida.

A Judge ruling that you have no standing to protest the total vitiation of the Florida remedial Statute designed to protect people such as your mother is a clear violation of 42 USCA 1983 and an assault on the First Amendment that cannot be tolerated. To then press “criminal charges against you” (non-contempt) is an absurdity. Prefatory rulings in criminal proceedings are ipso facto unconstitutional and a demonstration of bias, and just as serious is for you to not have an appointed attorney and be informed of your RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL. An honest intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of your case not only required it is mandated by the fundamental credos of America.

If Judges and lawyers ignore the ‘core values’ of America and the Rule of Law as set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States were have anarchy and chaos.

[1] I am aware that Gulags were soviet inventions –

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Finding again the Nation of Laws and effective Law Enforcement

Posted on August 24, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 23, 2014 6:17 PM
To: Barbara Stone , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Ginny Johnson , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , Glenda Martinez , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Illinois ARDC , BILL DITKOWSKY , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (”
Subject: verification of claims

Hundreds of citizens have complained to law enforcement, public officials, the courts, lawyer disciplinary commissions and just about anyone who will listen concerning the felonies of elder cleansing. Most of the complaints have fallen upon deaf ears.

The argument of the miscreants is very simple. How could these claims have any veracity as a Judge has examined them and found them to be frivolous. The question then becomes – do you trust the great unwashed or a judge wearing the mantel of respectability and the justice system? The public memory is short and thus, the miscreant’s appeal allows the conspirators to sweep even the most heinous of felonies under the rug. It also discourages law enforcement as they recognize that the same judicial mentality is going to address the issue and the result is predictable.

Thus, by the simple prevarication of claiming that the charges are all lies the felons are able to thwart any attempt to end their assaults on the Bill of Rights. Yes – that is what was done in the 1930s and resulted in the holocaust! Yes, that is what happened so as to promulgate Operation Greylord! Yes, that is the story of the Soviet gulags!

How do we counter the conspiracy (18 USCA 371)? Instead of preaching to the choir each victim or family member of a victim should file verified complaints with the Administrators of the Americans with Disabilities (Justice Department), local, federal and state law enforcement, attorney disciplinary commission, elected representatives and make certain that they are published on one or more of the various blogs devoted to defeating those predators who are proactively conducting the war on the elderly and the disabled.

Why will this be effective when nothing has worked in the past? There is no guaranty; however, an errant and dishonorable public servant–whether a lawyer, judge, political figure, or an administrator charged with protecting the public from lawyers — at some time is going to be called to account. Take Mr. Jerome Larkin. Larkin routinely claims that anyone who does not comport with his mindset and who opposes elder cleansing is a liar. When called to detail any statement that was untrue or inaccurate of course he never did so freely admitting that he could not – however, his kangaroo commissions had no trouble making generic false findings contrary to their mandate. Now that 4 people without a scintilla of knowledge attest that black is white, white is black, right is wrong, wrong is right etc it becomes an accepted fact! HOWEVER, America is still a Nation of Laws and we still have some honest law enforcement people. Thus, at some point in time, Larkin and his ilk are going to have to provide some backup to their totally false statements — and law enforcement will have verified statements to question each of the miscreants.

It has been pointed out that disabled people are not second class citizens and as to public facilities they must be afforded ‘reasonable accommodation.’ By railroading citizens into un-necessary and predatory guardianships the bad guys are outsmarted themselves. 1) they brought the last piece of remedial legislation into play – i.e. Americans with Disabilities – and Federal jurisdiction; 2) they created fiduciary relationships; and 3) they placed firm legal limits on their ability to cover up their criminal activities. [As an example – Larkin is aware that Farenga and Stern as guardian ad litem had a duty to report to the Court the robbery of Mary and Gloria’s safety deposit box, the large number of emergency room visits by Mary, the improper segregation of Mary from her younger daughter and her two siblings etc. Larkin in assaulting JoAnne’s and my First Amendment Rights committed serious criminal activity in the nature of a felony]

All the laws enacted are intended to work together – if a law enforcement officer has all the information available in a verified form his job is made much easier and the reward of a conviction is enhanced.

Ken Ditkowsky

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/14-8-18DrRCordero-MrCWilson_DignityAlliance.pdf

from Joanne

It should also be noted that in 2013 that the top 10 banks, from JP Morgan Chase to US Bank and Citibank, etc. paid 17 BILLION DOLLARS in a variety of fines, from selling worthless mortgages to Fannie Mae (JP Morgan Chase) to the almost $9 billion will go to homeowners who were victims of illegal foreclosure practices. http://online.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-america-near-16-billion-to-17-billion-settlement-1407355290

I just encountered someone this week that was never served in a mortgage foreclosure, but evicted any way. Another person suffered roof leaks, moved out, the landlord stole all this person’s stuff, he came back, the landlord called the police, said the lease produced was a forgery and he changed the dates by a year. The Victim was arrested. We just found out this “landlord” didn’t even have title–the property was owned by the bank after foreclosure! Please, if you lease, check the title records. If property is involved in a foreclosure–before or after, a tenant is entitled to 90 days notice prior to an eviction, for obvious reasons.

The top banks will pay over 100 BILLION in legal fees to defend various nefarious actions against the US government and consumers alike. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-28/u-s-bank-legal-bills-exceed-100-billion.html

From Dr. Richard Cordero — a request to work together and cooperate and some great ideas

Posted on August 24, 2014 by jmdenison

Dear Readers;

The purpose of this blog is to promote truth and justice. We must work together. There are too many dark and evil entities out there in the form of lawyers, court appointed workers and companies, judges and others who are victimizing and terrorizing wards and their families. Justice and truth must prevail.

From Dr. Cordero– another advocate for justice:

Dear Ms. Denison,

Thank you for your email and for your words of appreciation.

You may post the previous email as well as its follow-up, which is below.

Can you, your coreaders, and we work together as proposed in those two emails?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

*****************************************************************

First join forces to inform & outrage public re wrongdoing judges, remove them, then new legislation

Dear Mr. Roland and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,

Thank you for all your emails concerning my 3-step plan of action for exposing wrongdoing judges and bringing about judicial reform. I appreciate your kind words about it.

In particular, I am encouraged by the possibility that we may be able to work together. As I have repeatedly stated, we, advocates of honest judiciaries, need to join forces or we will continue to achieve only what we have achieved so far: nothing( ol:127¶4 ).

*NOTE: All ( parenthetical ) and [ ^bracketed ] blue text is references to supporting sections § or paragraphs¶, and foot- and endnote superscripts, respectively, found in the study downloadable through either of these links:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqw00v30ex3kbho/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx26luEuzfjgZTUwUkJIc3FNYnM/edit?usp=sharing >ol:127

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf >ol:127

In the downloaded file, the blue text represents active cross-referential links that facilitate jumping to the corresponding references to check them..

If you cannot download the file through any of those links, please let me know by emailing me at Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail.com .

Timing: the public must be informed of the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing before politicians adopt window dressing provisions

Your points, Mr. Roland, are well taken and presuppose for their implementation that we join forces. The pertinence of your 5^th point should be highlighted because it deals with the critical issue of timing. You wrote:

If you can, try to present the more appealing and easily understood reforms to the voters before the referendum, because it might persuade some to cast a yes vote.”

Wrongdoing judges now on the bench will still be there to misapply in self-interest any new statutory and constitutional provisions

Even constitutional amendments, let alone a statute, will leave in place wrongdoing judges to apply them. They will apply the new provisions in the same manner as they have current ones up to now: to protect themselves and each other to the detriment of parties and the rest of the public:

Federal chief circuit judges systematically dismiss 99.82% of misconduct complaints against their peers( jur:10-14 ) and together with other judges in circuit councils ⁹⁶ ( jur:20 ) deny up to 100% of petitions to review those dismissals( jur:24§§b-d ). In effect, they have arrogated to themselves the power to nullify in self-interest through their dishonest application the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 (28 U.S. Code §§ 351-364 ^18a ), enacted by the other two branches to enable any person to file a complaint against a federal judge (hereafter the Act).

Likewise, they routinely disregard 28 U.S.C. §455⁴⁰ , which imposes on them the duty to dis-qualify themselves on their own motion where “[their] impartiality might reasonably be ques-tioned” or where they have a bias ²⁷¹ or conflict of interests affecting them or their relatives, never mind their denial out of hand of motions by parties for their disqualification on such grounds ²⁷² .

Today’s wrongdoing judges will not be forced to respect the provisions against their own inter-ests contained in a new ink-besmirched piece of paper issued in future from Congress or a consti-tutional convention any more than they have been forced by current similarly besmirched paper. Their self-serving performance of their office will ensure that no complaint or motion ever crosses whatever new threshold is set for judges to take disciplinary action against themselves.

Politicians who do not investigate for wrongdoing ‘their men and women on the bench’ will not adopt effective provisions against them

Politicians have no interest in adopting, much less enforcing, provisions against judges, whom they recommended, nominated, and confirmed to judgeships( 77§§5-6 ). In fact, they disregard their own checks and balances on judges( 50¶¶95-97 ) in the form of the Annual Report that they require the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts ¹⁰ ^{http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/28usc601-613_Adm_Off.pdf} to submit to Congress ^23a http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/28usc601-613_Adm_Off.pdf with the statistics ^19a on judges’ handling of complaints against them.

Through their covering-up and encouraging disregard, politicians act as accessories after the judges’ Act-nullifying conduct in the year covered by a Report and accessories before such conduct in the following year.

By so holding ‘their own men and women on the bench’ unaccountable, politicians expect them to declare the statutes that form a party’s legislative agenda constitutional or unconstitutional^17a , as the case may be. Just examine how the majority of 5-4 votes in the Supreme Court are in har-mony with the party affiliation of the presidents who nominated the several justices.

Likewise, politicians expect that by not investigating judges, the latter will have no reason to retaliate against them if they appear before their bench charged with their own wrongdoing¹⁵ .

Only an informed and outraged public can force wrongdoing judges out of the bench and hold the remaining and new judges accountable

Before any referendum is held, and even before any discussion begins about amending the Constitution –rendered opportune after Michigan became last June the 34^th state to call for a constitu-tional convention ( jur:139fn ^{270 >Ln:309} ) -, the public must be informed about the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing( ol:127¶4 ) and its harm to the public’s property, liberty, and lives( jur:5§3 ).

Indeed, the national public will be outraged upon learning that the unaccountability of federal judges, who constitute the only national jurisdiction, induces them to engage risklessly in wrongdoing. The latter includes the judges’ arbitrary and harmful disregard for the constraints of due process as well as for the law applicable to, and the facts of, the cases that parties bring before them, which judges fob off with dishonest adjudicative services( ol:128 § c ).

Judges also do wrong by participating in criminal activity, such as concealment of assets to evade taxes and launder money( 65§§1-3 ), whereby they serve themselves indulgence in boundless conduct. By what they wrongfully deny others and allow themselves to do they usurp the status of Judges Above the Law.

The information about wrongdoing judges’ abusive and unequal treatment will outrage the pub-lic. It will also make understandable the far-reaching changes in statutory( 158§7 ) and consti-tutional provisions necessary to ensure that judges comply with the rule of law and administer to others and themselves Equal Justice Under Law, e.g.,

the establishment of independent citizen boards of judicial accountability and discipline( 160§8 )

establishment of an inspector general for the judiciary ( 158§6 );

the elimination of tenured judgeships;

the holding of all judicial meetings on an open door basis( ol:127 ¶ 4a ); etc.

A public outraged through information and assertively demanding those changes is indispensable. Without it, neither conniving politicians nor wrongdoing judges can be reasonably expected to make changes entailing their loss of power or privileged status.

Nor will wrongdoing judges apply any change honestly to give it effect in practice, for their interest lies in a cover-up and the frustration of all accountability measures. This calls for their removal from the bench. It can be effected under the current constitutional provision of Art. III, Sec. 1^12b , which allows the holding of a judgeship only “ during good Behaviour ” ^12a .

Only an outraged public can generate the opinion pressure needed to cause the resignation or impeachment of wrongdoing judges, the way it caused S.Ct. Justice Abe Fortas to resign in 1969 ( 92§d )…or to terminate the careers of politicians indifferent to its demands, the way voters in the Virginia primaries terminated the career of HR Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

Only politicians frightened at the prospect of having their political careers similarly terminated can find it in their highest interest, survival, to push through far-reaching statutory provisions and constitutional amendments for judicial reform and ensure that they are effectively applied.

Information about wrongdoing judges can enlighten the public about its status as the source of political power in ‘government of, by, and for the people’¹⁷² and about the need and its means( ol: 129¶9 ) to assert such status. It can so outrage the public as to stir it up to change the We the People -government balance of power:

The People are the employer of public officers, including judicial ones, and can change the terms of employment, which they can enforce through citizen boards rather than those officers to require transparency of performance, accountability, disci-pline, and liability to compensate their wrongdoing’s victims.

An informed and outraged public can develop into an assertive, Tea Party-like civic movement: the People ’s Sunrise( jur:164§9 ).

The time is now, before the elections and a constitutional convention, for us to join forces to inform and outrage the people

I have proposed a 3-step plan of action( ol:127 ) for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform: read the study of it( title ), continue it, and propose action. The proposed action is reasonable and feasible in terms of effort and money: to inform through presentations( Lsch:9 ) of:

the evidence already available of judges’ wrongdoing( jur:§§A-B );

investigative activities( ol:115 ), e.g., the pursuit of two stories( ol:100 ) that can outrage the public at the nature, extent , and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing in connivance with politicians :

1). the President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story and the Follow the money! investigation; and

2) the Federal Judiciary-NSA story and the Follow it wirelessly! investigation; and

the material and moral rewards( ol:3§F ) that can be earned by pursuing those activities and stories, such as winning a Pulitzer Prize, being played in a blockbuster movie, and receiving the recognition of a grateful nation as We the People ’s Champions of Justice.

The presentations are to be made to professionals( 128 § 4 ) and graduate students( 129§b ), such as:

journalists and media outlets ( ol:22 , 26 , 88 ) invited to private meetings or press conferences;

graduate schools of:

1) journalism(ol:54; Lsch:23)

2) law(Lsch:1, 21) and

3) business(jur:104¶¶236-237)

4) Information Technology(ol:42, 60);

public interest entities( jur:86§4 );

political meetings( ol:51 , 58 ); etc.

Swapping emails among us will get us nowhere.

Sending just one person to Congress, such as HR Candidate Andy Ostrowski, for him to persuade as many among the other 434 HR members as necessary, who are limited to a 2-year mandate and from day 1 are working on their ree-lection, to work against their own interest by taking on life-tenured unaccountable federal judges, is a mission impossible. If we do not provide Mr. Ostrowski with the support of like-minded candidates and eventually elected ones not only in the House, but also in the Senate, as well as the much more important support of an informed, outraged, and assertive national public, we too will fail in our effort at exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform.

Thus, are we willing to join forces and, if so, work actively, not just provide each other moral support, to implement that plan of action?

Timing is of the essence: The public should be informed and outraged before the mid-term election; the invaluable help of graduate students and others should be sought at the beginning of the academic year.

How can you contribute to arranging the proposed presentations?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare trigger history! ( jur:7§5 )…and you may enter it.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail.com

Dr. Karin Huffer’s further information-clickable links

Posted on August 24, 2014 by jmdenison

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwM0JwOTFEMm1qMVBzZnVvZHNWbHNPNVg1QjFr/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwNlhPWGhZUUJIZG4zS3lRcUo1QVNLMFNXcjY4/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwNlp2NmxPbFQ2a0xLNzNfeFNMWlctalVwRXNF/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwR3JvOE1TdW5EMzlCUE14ZG5la0dnRTNzTnVJ/edit?usp=sharing

You may want to check these out. She does have a test for PTLD or Legal abuse syndrom. I just recommend that anyone who has felt terrorized or fearful in court buy and read her book. A bit of advice from this amazing woman can help many, many people avoid PTLD and LAS.

From Ken Ditkowsky to US Atty General Eric Holder–Continuing reports of felonies and absues in Probate

Posted on August 23, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 22, 2014 11:38 AM
To: “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “Complaint ADA (CRT)” , Eric Holder , “FBI- (” , Chicago FBI , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , Cook County States Attorney , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “J. Ditkowsky” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago Tribune , Janet Phelan , SUNTIMES , Ginny Johnson , BILL DITKOWSKY , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Bev Cooper , “Chicagotonight (” , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Martin Kozak , “Jim (” , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Martha Jantho , “Fox2newsdesk (” , The Wall Street Journal , Eric Blair , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” , Barbara Stone , ACLU of Illinois , Rudy Bush , Sam Sugar , Alyece Russell , “Truthbetoldradio (” , “information@iardc.org” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Tom Fields , Nancy Vallone , RosANNa Miller , Glenda Martinez , Yjd , John Howard Wyman , Robert Bissonnette , Len Holland , Marty Prehn , Maria 60 Minutes , Theresa Pizzarello , “foxbusiness_7d7b711af105dca6eb5d0f24e6c8de86@newsletters.foxnews.com”
Cc: “ABAJournal.com” , WSJ Reporter , “weekend@cbsnews.com” , The Weekly Standard

Subject: COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES CONCERNING FELONIES COMMITTED (18 usca 4) & COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO ADA ON BEHALF OF PERSONS WHO ARE BEING DENIED THEIR CIVIL, HUMAN, AND PROPERTY RIGHTS BY THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIANS – THE SAID GUARDIANS EXCEEDING THEIR AUTHORITY.

This morning August 22, 2014 the Chicago Tribune reports that a criminal lawyer is being prosecuted for his subordination of perjury.    There is no report that Mr. Jerome Larkin or any of his staff members are being prosecuted for their role in the alleged subordination of perjury that occurred during the kangaroo hearings involving Attorney JoAnne Denison, or the perjury that was committed during Mr. Larkin’s assault on the First Amendment in the Amu case or in my case.
The facts are very simple.    Judge Stuart was asked questions concerning the ‘chaining’ of Ms. Gloria Sykes in Judge Stuart’s courtroom.    As there were court watchers present Mr. Larkin faces some serious legal problems because Judge Stuart is reported to have first denied that Ms. Sykes was handcuffed as part of the intimidation process, and then blurted out that this was the first only time such an event occurred.     As these proceedings are tightly controlled and there is evidence of ex-parte communications between the trier of fact and Mr. Larkin’s people the subordination of perjury problem is very acute.    The problem is aggravated by the fact that the panels in spite of having to address a standard of “clear and convincing evidence” in fact require no evidence and on facts to convict.    For instance, Mr. Larkin and the miscreant guardians and judicial officials have yet to disclose a single fact that Mr. Amu, Ms. Denison or I stated that was false much less provide any proof that such fact was in fact false.
When the transcript of Judge Stuart’s testimony was written up the transcript was reported to be altered so as to rectify and sanitize the aforesaid testimony.      As the Court reporter makes an audio recording to the testimony, Ms. Denison requested the same.      Hysterically Larkin and his attorneys have refused to provide the audio.         Mr. Larkin has a delegation for the Supreme Court of Illinois to protect the public from unethical lawyers.      How then does Mr. Larkin first present a witness who appears to be ‘frugal with the truth’ and then a transcript the uses an improper literary license in its presentation so as to alter the evidence presented so that the evidence is not in accord with objective reality?
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I am forwarding this note to the Department of Justice to report yet another felony that is occurring in the office of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.   I am also pursuant to Himmel reporting Mr. Larkin’s unacceptable and ethically challenged behavior to the Commission.   No I do not expect that they will do an HONEST intelligent complete or comprehensive investigation – from past history, I expect we will get another letter telling us to ‘pound sand!’     However, the problems reported are very serious and are a cancer that has infected the fabric of America.    Therefore, they need to be addressed.
To reiterate:
1)      First Amendment.      Even a pre-teen knows that all citizens have the duty pursuant to 18 USCA 4 to report felonies to law enforcement.     The right to petition the government is clearly stated not only in the First Amendment but in Article 1 section 4 of the Illinois Constitution and reiterated again at 735 ILCS 110/5.      Mr. Larkin is uninterested and therefore he has prosecuted lawyers for complaining about corruption in the Courts.    Ms. Denison, Mr. Amu and I have been victims of Larkin’s ultra vires and unconstitutional behavior.
2)      Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment.      Equal protection of the law is a ‘core value’ of America; however, Mr. Larkin does not recognize the same.     The proceedings before his panels are notorious for being kangaroo courts replete with ex-parte communications, perjury, bias and other deficiencies.    The proceedings against Mr. Amu smack of racism!      I am surprised that the panel did not chuck its suit for White Sheets and hoods!
3)      Discrimination against the elderly, the disabled, and the infirm.      There are several ways that one can look at Mr. Larkin’s actions.    The problem is in every way that the actions are described the actions are reprehensible and wrong.     In both my proceeding and that of Ms. Denison the treatment of Ms. Gloria Sykes is and was totally improper and ethically challenged.    One of the most glaring acts occurred on or about July 1.     As the evidence of the criminal activity of the two guardian ad litem and the guardian mounted so that even the Judges were indicating embarrassment concerning the miscreant behavior a senior attorney (Ms. Guzman) refused a complaint against the miscreants on the basis that Adam Stern had been appointed guardian ad litem for Gloria Sykes.     Of course Ms. Guzman was operating under the standard credo of the IARDC as administered by Larkin – i.e. do not confuse me with the facts, I’ve made up my mind.     When Ms. Sykes voiced her outrage at the knowingly false statement Ms. Guzman 17 days later claimed that her prevarication was a ‘typo!’

Larkin and the IARDC are aware of Congress has decreed in the Americans with Disabilities Act that disabled people are be afforded reasonable accommodation for their disability.    755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 (b) recites the goal of the State of Illinois and thus limits any adventure by judicial officials and guardians in excess of the ADA.     In a State in which school children have difficulty naming the governors who have not gone to jail and in which it has been calculated that $3008 dollars a year per capita is the cost of corruption it is not surprising that some judges and some lawyers would create a cottage industry –for profit – that preys on the elderly.

Ms. Denison and I pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and our moral conscience started documenting and complaining to law enforcement concerning the infamies of some of the more famous guardian ad litem and guardians.    Mr. Larkin in a blatant and obvious attempt to silence me and any other attorney who might protest filed ambiguous and misleading averments claiming that I was making some unspecified, unidentified, and idiopathic false statements concerning judicial officials.       Ms. Denison was accused of publishing the statements on her blog even though 47 USCA 230 provides her with complete immunity.     Mr. Larkin was aware of 1) that the statements that were published were all based upon sworn affidavits of the family members and friends of victims, and 2) the lack of denial by the averred miscreant.     Mr. Larkin was also aware that the statements were all protected by the First Amendment and several years prior a bunch of judicial officials including lawyers, judges, and court personnel went to jail for attempting and participating in a not to dissimilar stunt.

Never the less Larkin and attorneys employed by the State of Illinois to serve in the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission commenced a concerted effort to silence any attorney who sought to protest the criminal conduct of elder cleansing i.e.   the railroading of senior into a guardianship wherein the guardians isolated the victim from his/her family, his /her liberty interest, and whatever assets the victim might own possess or otherwise have viable claim.     After the cottage industry of judicial officials and those who aid and abet the criminal process is completed that victim is assisted to perform an involuntary assisted suicide.

Up to this point in time anyone who is taking the time to read this e-mail knows that I’ve made this statement dozens of times and in a dozen different ways; however, Mr. Tim Larkin sat me down this week to point out that while everything that I’ve said to this point in time is accurate and presents a horrible cancer that threatens to destroy the core values of America, Congress and the Justice Department have been much more specific in informing the public as to how twenty-first Century America expects its disabled people to be treated.    Thus, the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The ADA is not another of those acts that congress or a legislature enacted so that some political hack could go back to his district and tell the public how he passed legislature that was going to bring world peace to *****.     It is a credo!     It is a manifesto!      And it says that America society shall accommodate the deficiencies of its disabled so that they will enjoy America just as if they were not disabled.     To indicate that this is serious stuff, the exceptions are few but they are significant.   Certain self-inflicted disabilities are not covered.

What does this mean?    It means that when Adam Stern reports that Mary Sykes does not want **** and Mary is recorded on a video and pens a written statement that she wants ***** the Court or other provider is required to make reasonably available ***** for Mary.     It also means that if Mary is capable of doing her banking, visiting her sisters, jawing with her younger daughter the guardian has no power or ability to interfere.    The Cynthia Farenga or Peter Schmiedel excuse of the family agitating Mary is not available, applicable, appropriate or even allowable.    The ravaging of Mary Sykes’ estate even with a Court order is a violation of ADA.    I do not have to go into detail as the ADA cases and the position of the Justice Department on the subject are a matter of public record.   This public record is presumed to be KNOWN to lawyers such as Larkin Guzman, Black, Stern, Solo, Farenga, Schmiedel etc.

What this means therefore is that Larkin, Guzman, Black, Stern, Solo Farenga, Schmiedel et al have acted in concert to deny Mary Sykes, Alice Gore ***** their Civil Rights and protections provided for pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act.     It also means that all those who have acted in concert with them directly or indirectly are also guilty.      The active participation in a scheme to violated the Civil Rights of a disabled person is a very serious offense and must be addressed.     ADA provides for substantial penalties for the violations.

As evidence of these violations I incorporate by reference the following official files:

1)      The bogus disciplinary proceedings including documents filed in the various courts in the cases of myself, Ms. Denison, and any other attorney who was directly or indirectly involved in a guardianship case.     (These files will demonstrate that all attempts by private citizens to obtain an ‘accommodate’ for a disabled person was thwarted by not only Larkin, Guzman, assorted judicial officials, but a host of other co-conspirators.)
2)      The Probate Court files maintained by various Circuit Courts clerks in guardianship cases such as Sykes 09 P4585, Gore, Wyman, Tyler etc in Illinois
3)      GA0 reports to Congress
4)      Citizen complaints and protests to lawyer disciplinary commissions concerning the actions of certain judges such as Connors, Stuart, Reynolds guardian ad litem such as Stern, Farenga, Schmiedel, Solo, administrators such as Larkin, Guzman, Black,
Supra, I referred to the incident involving Gloria Sykes.   Gloria Sykes is the younger daughter of Mary Sykes.    As part of a treatment for a disability Ms. Sykes has a ‘helper’ or ‘companion’ dog.    This animal is essential to Ms. Sykes’ health.   Such is a disability that is recognized pursuant to ADA.     The threat of a guardian ad litem to ‘kill’ Ms. Sykes treatment dog does not qualify as an “accommodation”     The arbitrary refusal of Attorney Black and Attorney Larkin to not allow Gloria to have the dog present with Gloria as she testifies in not an acceptable accommodation under the act.     This is especially true as the excuse made was a bold faced untruth – Larkin’s attorney claimed falsely that the building would not allow the animal in the building.
Reasonable accommodation is the LAW OF THE LAND.     When we elect Jerome Larkin dictator he can change the law.    Until that date he should be required like every other citizen to comply with the law.

Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

From Ken Ditkowsky OVER REACHING and the CRIMINAL violations of Civil Rights of Probate Victims and the Elder Cleansers

Posted on August 23, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 23, 2014 9:08 AM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Tim NASGA , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Chicago FBI , “FBI- (” , Cook County States Attorney , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “JoAnne M. Denison” , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , Cook Sheriff , Bev Cooper , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC”
Subject: OVER-REACHING – criminal violations of civil rights –

Overlooked in so many of the Elder Cleansing cases is square one! In Sykes, it appears that Mary was declared incompetent by the agreement of the two guardian ad litem and the petitioner. (see Adam Stern e-mail to Gloria Sykes). In Wyman the determination was even more venal. Judges in each of these cases ‘rubber stamped’ the determinations of the members of the cottage industry of elder cleansing and even though everyone knows that criminal conduct has occurred nothing has been done except CYA and cover-up.

The insidiousness of the cover-up by Mr. Larkin and the IARDC comes clear when we realize that guardianship is by its nature a deprivation of liberty and property rights and human rights of a citizen. Everyday I and others receive anguished letters from family of the victims of elder cleansing who are aggrieved that villains are ravaging their loved ones and robbing them of all dignity. The frustration extends to courts that are manned by judicial officials who are no more than rubber-stamps for the miscreants, law enforcement that claims to have its hands tied, and political operatives who have their hand in the till.

Illinois’ corruption cost per capita $3008. The guardianship frauds aid to the total! By statute the person making application for a guardianship to be imposed on a fellow citizen has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the incompetency. This is not an easy burden and it is not intended to be; however, as the Sykes file 09 P4585 reveals all it took was the agreement of several miscreants and Mary Sykes’ life was snatched from her! In her evidence deposition Judge Connors revealed her attitude and her disdain for not only the statutory mandates but the case law, to wit:

Test of incompetency

Test applied in determining judicially whether a conservator should be appointed is whether the person is capable of managing his own affairs. Matter of Conservatorship of Browne, App.1976, 35 Ill.App.3d 962, 343 N.E.2d 61 ; Macdonald v. La Salle Nat. Bank, 1957, 11 Ill.2d 122, 142 N.E.2d 58 , appeal dismissed 78 S.Ct. 330, 355 U.S. 271, 2 L.Ed.2d 257 .

Evidence was insufficient to establish that mother was a disabled person, in action to adjudicate mother incompetent and appoint a guardian; two physicians, both who had recently examined mother, found that she exhibited no cognitive disabilities or mental conditions, and that she was well-adjusted and capable of managing her own personal and financial decisions. Williams v. Estate of Cole, App. 1 Dist.2009, 333 Ill.Dec. 27, 393 Ill.App.3d 771, 914 N.E.2d 234 . Mental Health Key Number

135

Test which is applied in judicially determining whether conservator should be appointed for incompetent person is whether individual is capable of managing his person or estate. Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health Key Number

105

To simply establish certain disabilities is alone insufficient to support determination of incompetency, for purposes of appointing conservator; evidence must also show alleged incompetent’s incapability of managing her person or estate. Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health Key Number

105

Capability to manage one’s person, for purposes of appointment of conservator, does not resolve itself upon question of whether individual can accomplish tasks without assistance, but rather whether that individual has capability to take care and intelligently direct that all his needs are met through whatever device is reasonably available under circumstances. Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health Key Number

105

In proceeding for appointment of conservator for alleged incompetent, an 81-year-old woman who had voluntarily entered nursing home after giving her son power of attorney over her estate, record was barren of any evidence showing alleged incompetent’s incapability of managing her person or estate, and, in fact, supported contrary conclusion. Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health Key Number

135

Neither conclusion of an attorney that elderly individual was incapable of handling her business affairs nor unsubstantiated statements of two doctors to effect that it was in best interest of individual to have a conservator appointed was sufficient to establish that individual was so incompetent as to require the appointment of a conservator for her estate. Matter of Conservatorship of Browne, App. 3 Dist.1976, 35 Ill.App.3d 962, 343 N.E.2d 61 . Mental Health Key Number

135

The belief of a person upon religious or political questions cannot be made a test of his sanity. Belz v. Piepenbrink, 1925, 149 N.E. 483, 318 Ill. 528 . Wills Key Number

On an application for the appointment of conservator the true question is whether the person has sufficient mental capacity to transact ordinary business,–take care of and manage his or her property. Snyder v. Snyder, 1892, 31 N.E. 303, 142 Ill. 60 .

The test of insanity depends upon the object to purpose for which the insanity is to be proved and what might be regarded insanity in one case would not necessarily be insanity in another. No definite rule can be laid down which will apply to all cases alike. Snyder v. Snyder, 1892, 31 N.E. 303, 142 Ill. 60 .

On an application for appointment of conservator the true question was whether the person had sufficient mental capacity to transact ordinary business,–take care of and manage his or her own property in view of § 37, R.S.1874, p. 685, making that the test of whether conservator should be continued. Leefers v. People, 1907, 123 Ill.App. 634 .

The Legislature has defined the purpose of guardianship so as to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, to wit:

Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations 755 ILCS 5/11a-3

As everyone is aware – most of the guardianships that are under our discussion are ultra-vires usurpations of the Civil and Human Rights of the disabled person. No-one can appropriately justify removing the alleged incompetents who are the subject of these discussions from contact with family members, friends, and prior activities.

By the definition of most civilized and intelligent people the mining of the teeth of a elderly persons for the gold in her teeth is not the promotion of her well being! Whether a judge authorized the action or not – such is exploitation! Yet, as part of the cover-up Jerome Larkin and the IARDC wrote the Coopers to inform them that there was no ethical violation – indeed, the ethical violation was reporting the same!

Let me suggest to you that when a corrupt judge enters an order finding that a particular individual is incompetent under the provisions of the Illinois Act that judge subjects himself/herself and the appointees to the Americans with Disabilities Act criterion. Thus, the Court is limited to entering orders that are limited “to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations” Ergo, the Judge who allows that guardian to place the ward in a nursing home against the wishes of the family, 300 – 500 dollars awards of Attorney fees and guardianship fees are all ultra vires and criminal conduct.

The State and Federal law both mandate that the guardianship is an accommodation tool and nothing more!!!!! Thus, involuntary segregation of the ward from family and friends is not only improper but more criminal conduct!

PURSUANT TO 18 USCA 4 LET THIS E-MAIL BE A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THAT IN THE MARY SYKES CASE AND MANY MORE GUARDIANSHIP CASES HEREIN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS JUDICIAL OFFICIALS ARE IGNORING THE EXPRESS PROVISIONS OF ILLINOIS LAWS, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, AND CIVIL RIGHTS AS THEY ALLOW FAVORED LAWYERS AND OTHER PERSONS TO DEPRIVE SENIOR CITIZENS AND OTHERS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. LET THIS ALSO BE A FORMAL COMPLAINT THAT MR. JEROME LARKIN AND A NUMBER OF HIS SENIOR ATTORNEYS ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE VIOLATION OF ADA AND HUMAN RIGHTS including but not limited to committing various other and different felonies such as theft, exploitation, fraud, perjury, mail fraud, wire fraud etc. [the MARY SYKES CASE 09 p 4585 Pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois is a prime example.]

Ken Ditkowsky

On ebay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Legal-Abuse-Syndrome-Huffer-Karin-M-f-t-/360730427562?pt=US_Nonfiction_Book&hash=item53fd3580aa

Email to Dr. Huffin–what our situation in Chicago currently is

Posted on August 23, 2014 by jmdenison

Email to Dr. Huffin —

rom: JoAnne M Denison <jdenison@surfree.com>

To: legalabuse@gmail.com, Atty Ken Ditkowsky <ken@ditkowskylawoffice.com>, mary Sue Richards <careringintl@gmail.com>, Lynn Drabik <kibardtown@yahoo.com>, Jean Semrow <jasemrow@hotmail.com>, Mike Messer <Mike3855@aol.com>, Richana Owens Marie Owens Daughter <rshawnieo@comcast.net>, Rodney Owens <owens.rodney@att.net>, Daiva Marija <daivas8888@gmail.com>, Daiva SANDANAVICIUTE <italasan@gmail.com>, Gloria Sykes <gloami@msn.com>

Subject: thanks for your book—Legal Abuse Syndrome

Date: Aug 23, 2014 10:39 AM

I would like to feature your book on my blog. I have read the first part of it and I have to let you know that you have really nailed this problem. I bought it on Kindle

I am a lawyer in Chicago that works with probate court abuse victims. I have many of the people you describe as actual clients and blogging clients. Your descriptions are accurate and truthful and the miscreants involved have no idea how the wards, their families and friends are terrorized in court where they are repeatedly told to shut up, their please are ignored and loved ones are locked up, locked down and drugged until they perish–which is always after the probate attorneys involved drain the estate with their tied in friends too–(anti) social workers, case (mis) managers, visiting nurse (terrorizers). No one ever knows or understands the problem unless they are directly involved. It is sheer agony. And the goal of these attorneys is to drain the estate, lie about funds being with other relatives and then drain those relatives too leaving everyone homeless and penniless in the end. I have worked on my probate corruption blog since Nov. of 2011, and never did I imagine I would receive literally scores of stories of terrorization in court, the ruination of many people and the relentless flinging of corrupted papers and documents against wholly innocent family members.

I deal with these walking wounded all the time. So I greatly appreciate your book.

I saw your video too. If you would like, I invite you to write articles for my blog about your stories and I will in turn feature your book.

You did an excellent job that will help many.

thanks so very much

joanne

Her Response:

From: legal abuse syndrome <legalabuse@gmail.com> [Edit Address Book]

To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com>

Subject: Re: thanks for your book—Legal Abuse Syndrome

Date: Aug 23, 2014 11:11 AM

Attachments: 1-12-11PTSD Assessmenton.pdf 4-3-12EAA Brochure.pdf ADAABAPositionPaper.pdf 7-19-14jorge Webinar flyer and Press Release-2.pdf 8-16-14Press Release domestic violence.docx

Thank you. Of course I will in turn support your blog as we have to get the word out and end our legal procedures being used as weapons, tools of theft, and a public health menace. I am attaching some materials here for you to review. Feel free to use from what I send in your blog mentioning my name is appreciated as it keeps the information flowing. Domestic Violence is thought to be young men on women when it is any family or intimate person who attempts to use coercive control and remove the civil rights from the target. I have articles that I am happy to send you as well. Just let me know. I am training ADA Advocates by webinar starting Sept. 30 I included that too. The answer here is to inundate these courts with Disability Advocates.

Dr. Karin Huffer

From: JoAnne M Denison <jdenison@surfree.com>

To: legal abuse syndrome <legalabuse@gmail.com>, Atty Ken Ditkowsky <ken@ditkowskylawoffice.com>

Subject: Re: thanks for your book—Legal Abuse Syndrome

Date: Aug 23, 2014 11:40 AM

Dear Dr. Huffer

thanks so much for your prompt reply. I will publish on my blog what you have sent me to try to help these victims.

The blog is located at http://www.marygsykes.com and http://www.justice4every1.com and I start this blog when a certain Mary G Sykes was railroaded into a guardianship without notice to her or her elderly sisters, so the case has been running without jurisdiction for 5 years now! I could not believe that Mary was not served, nor her sisters and the lawyers involved are soooo greedy, they don’t care either. Mary Sykes, being 94 now is a victim, living with a dark, greedy estranged daughter she never wanted to live with. Her younger daughter, Gloria has been fighting the system for 5 years now, and she had some unfair litigation before that (insurance claim where the insurance company made a bad repair, then mold grew throughout the home making the repair exceedingly expensive), so they stopped work and sued HER. eventually that lawsuit was settled, but Gloria walked away with $500k, so what did the miscreants do? Guardianize mom and then go after Gloria’s money, mom’s money,–you name it, it was a mess, but they all have gotten away with it. The claim for all the miscreants? Mom “needs the money for her care”. The truth? All of the money went to the attorneys! That’s right, some $350k after 5 years of litigation did not go to “mom’s care” but to 3 tied in and tied up attorneys.

Complaints were filed with the Illinois ARDC. Ken Ditkowsky, Mary’s former attorney, as well as I, have be vociferous in our complaints and publishing the truth about this case and others–that the Cook County Probate Court is a disaster and magnate for the greedy and unethical and they terrorize wards, friends and families alike.

So Ken Ditkowsky has been suspended for 4 years from the practice of law for speaking the truth –at age 78. He writes prolifically for my blog. I publish the stories, comments and helpful legal tips and tricks and briefs and pleadings for probate victims and give them credibility to their claims. So the ARDC charged me with misconduct and I am patiently waiting for their “discipline” for my telling the truth publicly on my blog about the Sykes case and others.

At my trial, the relatives of Mary showed up and testified–and were told “sour grapes” by my tribunal. So they were abused at the probate court level for years, then they show up to help ME out, and they are abused by the Illinois ARDC.

There are no limits to the greed, corruption and evil that surrounds the Illinois Probate Court system located in the Chicago Daley Center on the 18th floor.

They terrorize families left and right, up and down. The names of the miscreants are well known and well publicized on numerous probate blogs–mine, http://www.probatesharks.com and http://www.NASGA.com.

And still we fight. Thanks again. Please read my blog and send me articles to post.

thanks for all that you do for these largely unrecognized and not understood victims and their families.

JoAnne

cc: http://www.marygsykes.com

Excellent book on Legal Abuse Syndrome or Post Traumatic Litigation Disorder

Posted on August 23, 2014 by jmdenison

Dear Readers;

After talking to dozens and dozens of probate court room victims and their families, I think we pretty well know that people generally do NOT escape the probate court room debacle psychologically unscathed. In fact, I am absolutely certain that most of you have learned that there are simply hugely damaged victims of court room abuses.

I received an email from someone today that had a byline of the following book:

Legal Abuse Syndrome by Ms. Karin Huffer, Mft and I bought it and was surprised at right off the bat, how she nailed the repeated saying of Legal Abuse Syndrome clients:

1) I am a a good person, clean living person, but this (LAS) is “cruel and unusual” punishment

2) the actions of (court room attorneys) are cruel and unusual, they are not normal, they are persons without souls, they have no conscious, etc.

3) what kind of a lawless country is this, where the courts allow liars and thieves to ruin people’s lives?

4) everyone says Chicago is so corrupt and no one does anything about it. The judges let the attorneys run corrupt courts (or vice versa–the attorneys help the judges run corrupt courts).

5) the victims feel numb, depressed, disconnected and vulnerable, they many rant and rage, they may have uncontrollable rages, they often feel a need to scream and shout at everyone, or send dozens of emails before and after court appearances, esp. sometimes, they may win on a point (visitation, or get a citation to discover dismissed, or some counts against them dismissed) and they are sooo rattled in court, they don’t even know that the judge actually handed them a win.

6) they can’t find an attorney because either they can’t afford one, and/or when they try to talk to an attorney, they come off as emotional, disconnected, illogical and confused over facts and situations. They know they have been gravely and severely harmed, but associate social concepts with their harm (lying as a claim, when defamation or slander is the claim, fraud on the court when they mean perjury, etc)

7) being disillusioned and depressed as an American citizen is common.

Links:

On Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Legal-Abuse-Syndrome-avoiding-traumatic-ebook/dp/B00E98YXM0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1408810407&sr=8-1&keywords=Legal+Abuse+Syndrome

Also check out Ms. Huffer’s videos on Youtube:

So Ms. Huffer, kudos, you’re nailing it in this book and I highly recommend the book to all of my probate victims. Even if you don’t think you are a victim, if you feel scared, terrified, confused–any of these, before and after court appearances, this book may help you and at $7.99 on Kindle (read it on your computer in seconds, you don’t need a Kindle reader, just a PC or laptop), it should be a great help for many of you out there.

JoAnne

From Ken Ditkowsky — the letter from Ms. Guzman is fairly amazing. I have to agree!

Posted on August 22, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> [Edit Address Book]

To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com>

Subject: Re: Fw: ardc response Alice R. Gore 8-18-14 -COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Date: Aug 21, 2014 7:58 PM

The letter is indictment of Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman! When this letter is matched to the July letter of Ms. Guzman falsely claiming that Adam Stern was appointed the GAL for Gloria Sykes it is very clear that Federal Felonies are being promulgated in the office of the IARDC as well as being covered up. (It took Guzman 17 days to discover that no one was buying her intentionally false statement concerning Ms. Sykes and thus her prevarication designed to provide cover for not investigating Adam Stern was exposed)

Thus pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I have reported to Federal and State law enforcement the criminal conduct of Larkin and certain attorneys who are paid by the State of Illinois as to:

1) aiding abetting numerous felonies committed by judges and court appointed guardians in which senior citizens are robbed of their liberty, property and human rights (see Sykes 09 P 4585)

2) assaults on the Bill of Rights and core values of the United States of America

3) violations of Human Rights. As Tim has indicated violations of Americans with Disability act and as demonstrated by Ms. Guzman’s letter to the Coopers – violations of human rights and the law of civilization. Imagine a public body and an attorney paid a substantial salary by citizens of Illinois attempting to condone lawyers and judges ganging up on a 90 year of widow to mine her mouth for the gold filings! ********

Remember in the early days of Television there was program called Ripley’s Believe it Not. Every day absurdities were exposed. I can top any that were ever published! I read the Jerome Larkin teaches CLE (Continuing Legal Education) classes on ethics!!!!!

Half of the people in the United States are below average in intelligence!!!

Ken Ditkowsky

My response: I think Janet Phelan is right on in invoking international treaties against torture. Forced druggings, false imprisonments in nursing homes, intentional and strenuous isolation from a multitude of family members and close friends are rampant. It is psychological and physical torture that did not come with a declaration of war or the “undeclaration” of war. It is clear and insidious torture on the elderly and disableds nonetheless==and their families.

From Ken Ditkowsky –just who is aiding and abetting the Sykes, Gore, Wyman, IL, Spera and other tragedies

Posted on August 22, 2014 by jmdenison

From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> [Edit Address Book]

To: Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>, Sam Sugar <ssugarmd@msn.com>, “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” <gcoleman@bclclaw.com>

Subject: Fw: Frankel v State of Indiana

Date: Aug 21, 2014 8:23 PM

Attachments: 1 1 Tim ADA DOJ prakel_soi.pdf

What should be attached is a document filed in that case which addresses your problem to a tea! According to Indiana lawyers the Chief Judge of the Indiana Supreme Court was forced to retire because of this Frankel case. It appeared that the Department of Justice clamped down on him after he refused to accommodate.

This ‘elder cleansing’ scandal is massive and bit by bit the USA is getting more pro-active. The bad guys are the nursing home/hospice operators who are spreading bribes around like money was water. (The days of the white envelope filled with cash are over). I’ve been watching Illinois and waiting for the IRS’ political corruption unit to show up on Mr. Jerome Larkin’s door and *******. (saw them operate during the Dan Walker (Illinois) administration – and also in connection with *****). These guys are so intimidating you want to confess to whatever they want you *****. In the early 1980’s I was having lunch with one of the my opponents in the Cigarette Use Tax case and watch his hands shake when one of the IRS agents came by our table to say hello to me. Phil ***** could not eat another drop of food. For months afterwards I implored my IRS friend to market his appeal to some of my friends who were having a weight problem.

As the United States of America is developing a choir in South Florida and apparently intends to present a concert in the near future – it really would be in the best interests of the political populations to ‘get religion!’ They should read Federal Statutes for penitence and in particular, the Americans with Disabilities Act. Doing the right thing and complying strictly with the Federal Statutes is strongly advised. The consequences of avarice can be fatal to *******.

I am recommending that the Justice Department get verified full and complete statements of your complaints = Mr. Coleman promised that he would “look into” this guardianship infamy – I would recommend that he be called on his promise and he also receive all the information that is relevant or MAY LEAD TO RELEVANT INFORMATION. If the FBI gets the information that it desires there are a large number of lawyers and judges who are going to populate our jails very soon. In my opinion, any lawyer who is involved in this ‘elder cleansing’ scenario who does not sojourn to the nearest Federal building an offer the join the choir is not very bright!

Ken Ditkowsky

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:25 PM
Subject: Frankel v State of Indiana

Attached is a document found in the case of Frankel v Indiana This is a case arising under the Americans with Disability Act and the facts are very simple. The attachment was sent to me.

What this attachment demonstrates is that the position of the Attorney General of the United States is very clear. A disabled person does not lose any rights by action of government, the only rights lost are those which nature takes from him/her. Congress has decreed that government shall do its level best to accommodate the disabled person so that the person’s handicap is limited as much as possible.

JoAnne – what makes this position paper so important is that while Mr. Jerome Larkin and Ms. Guzman do not believe in the Rule of Law as set forth by the Constitution, the Supreme Court decisions, et al, Larkin is alone with his cronies in very serious violations of the law. Mr. Holder in Frankel points out just how far he expects government to go to protect the disabled person. This is far cry from what happened and was approved by Larkin in reference to Sykes, Gore etc. In point of fact it appears that Larkin is not only aiding and abetting the criminal felonies that have been committed, but he is doing so in the fact of yet another Federal Statute.

Few public officials, except for a house painter in the 1930’s, went as far as Mr. Larkin. Ms. Guzman in her recent letter to the Coopers apparently, with the consent of Larkin, compounds the felony. Read the Statement of Interest of the United States of America that is attached.

As a matter of courtesy and pursuant to Himmel, I have sent a copy of the position paper to the IARDC so that if there is anyone present who takes the oath of an attorney seriously, an Honest, complete, intelligent and comprehensive investigation of Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman will take place expeditiously and honestly. Larkin is reported not have filed an Ethics statement (for many years) and investigators have informed me of irregularities hinted at *****. The IARDC should not have as its administrator a person who is demonstrating no respect for the law and who is consistently misusing his position.

Ken Ditkowsky

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwWkNPXy1ZV2Frd0U/edit?usp=sharing

—– Forwarded Message —–
From:
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: WestlawNext – RETHINKING GUARDIANSHIP (AGAIN): SUBSTITUTED DECISION MAKING AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

I am just catching up to the return home ….

attached is the “Prakel” DOJ Statement of Interest —— pay particular close attention to the issue of “associational discrimination” and the role family members play in support of one and other in court proceedings ….. then think about all this family interference taking place and all the victims screaming about their family members ….. once you have digested this DOJ doc ….. let me know and I want to send you a particular SCOTUS case

to read with this DOJ statement

—–Original Message—–

Sent: Thu, Aug 21, 2014 4:13 pm
Subject: Fw: WestlawNext – RETHINKING GUARDIANSHIP (AGAIN): SUBSTITUTED DECISION MAKING AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

Another Dose of Justifiable Out Rage from Ken Ditkowsky after an ARDC Response to the case of Alice Gore

Posted on August 21, 2014 by jmdenison

Another letter from Ms. Guzman at the ARDC in response to a complaint against Ms. Solo (aka Soloveichik)

Of course, this is the letter in which the Coopers detail the fact that $1.5 million was missing from Mother Alice Gore’s estate and further, 29 gold teeth were pulled from a 99 year old woman. Does all of that faze the ARDC? Of course not!

Favorite quote:

After carefully reviewing the information and documentation you submitted, we have
determined that many of your complaints are essentially disagreements regarding the legal
actions taken, advice given and decisions made by Ms. Vidal. The attorney for an Estate
maintains certain discretion in conducting the business of an estate, which would not generally
provide a basis for the discipline of the attorney.

From: Lucius Verenus <verenusl@gmail.com>
To: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: ardc response Alice R. Gore 8-18-14 -COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Ken, another point of interest is the claim by Ms. Guzman and Ms. Hays that Ms. Hays is a “guardian” as mentioned in the court transcript. Ms. Hays is an employee of the “American Bank” that handled the financial aspects of Alice’s estate. She was never appointed by the court as a guardian. While Alice was alive Kimberly Cooper (a disabled person) was her guardian and Kimberly’s guardian at that time may have been the Katten law firm. kc

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 PM, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mr. and Mrs. Cooper,

Thank you for forwarding to me the latest response of Ms. Guzman and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

I had occasion this past week to have discussions with Tim concerning the Americans With Disabilities Act. I had previously read the act, but, I had not previously read the regulations promulgated by the Department of Justice. Briefly the Act is Congress’ statement as to protecting the all disabled people including senior citizens such as Alice Gore. The action seeks to prevent exactly what happened to Alice Gore, Mary Sykes, ********.

Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I am forwarding Ms. Guzman’s letter to the Justice Department. The letter is another in a series of Cover-up and aiding and abetting communications designed not to do the job that was delegated to the ARDC – i.e. protecting the public and in particular disabled people. As an example – Ask Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman how it accommodates a senior citizen to have her separated from her family, have her assets removed from her, and have her teeth mined for the gold content of her filings!

When Ms. Guzman suggests that the complaints made are disingenuous she and Mr. Larkin (who is her supervisor) are not only being disingenuous, but are aiding and abetting the felonies that you have reported! I do not know where Mr. Larkin and Ms Guzman are coming from in making the statements that they made. Both are fully aware that 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq. is not a ‘ carte blanc‘ delegation of Mrs. Gore’s civil and human rights to whomever a corrupt judge wishes to reward. Like ADA the guardianship act is designed to provided whatever limited assistance that Alice Gore reasonably needed and wanted.

The stand to be determined was no “the best interests of the ward” as determine artificially by a avarice inspired political hack who was appointed by a Judge. The standard is what the alleged then and there and there disabled person reasonably wanted as best could be determined. (If the alleged disabled person is not disabled as to the particular subject matter the guardian has no jurisdiction or discretion – without a special court hearing complete with notice and hearing and a finding by the court based upon the notice hearing. Asking Adam Stern or Miriam Solo what the disabled person desired is not compliance with the law – it is another lawless action that violates basic civil rights).

Getting back to the violations of federal law that Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkin are engaged. (see 18 USCA 371). It is apparent that both Ms. Guzman and Larkin knew that Congress has decreed that citizens with disabilities are no second class citizens. Both are aware that government and others must make reasonable accommodation for the disabled senior citizen and a instrumentality whose actual purpose as demonstrated in a bunch of reports to congress by governmental agencies is pernicious and abusive is not compliance – IT IS A CRIMINAL ACT.

THUS, I am forwarding the letter you received to the ADA administration and the Justice Department and I am advising you that you should do the same. In your complaint you should report chapter and verse and forward copies of all the CYA and other disingenious communications that you reveived from Mr. Larkin, Ms. Guzman et al. What we have in the attached letter is a serious violation of the law that Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman knows is such a violation.

As I am lead to believe that both Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkin are lawyers, pursuant to Himmel I have copied the IARDC. It is their obligation to investigation both Ms Guzman and Mr. larkin and determine why they have violated the clear mandate of the ADA and its regulations and continue to aid and abet the violation of the liberty and the property rights of senior citizens. (I expect that the IARDC will continue the cover-up – but at least the required Himmel Report will be made).

For the record – my response is intended to be public and may be reproduced at your discretion and desire.

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

More reports of Nefariousness from the IL case

Posted on August 21, 2014 by jmdenison

MaryGSykes.com

One of the things I have warned repeatedly about on this blog are probate attorneys that do nothing while the miscreants are committing torts left and right, and those that promise “you will be back in your house in 6 months if you (fill in the blank– pay us money, don’t object to our felonies, abuse, ridiculous gag orders and illegal restraints on visitations or visits with tied in agencies on secret lists that are never bidded out or have performance bench markers and parameters. Go figure.)

View original post 700 more words

More reports of Nefariousness from the IL case

Posted on August 21, 2014 by jmdenison

So today, dedicated son calls me and says “I’ve had it with court”, they have lied to me, it’s taken me 2 years to get supervised visitation they want all of $800k which has been in both my name and my parent’s names for a decade, my evil sib is telling the court I owned nothing at the home, there are pipes burst in the home with slow repairs (as published on the blog as a typical scheme/scam) and now they want to move the contents out of the home into storage and they have valued it at about 10% of it’s value and don’t want an independent appraisal.

The real question is, why does he put up with a lawyer that stands by and “just goes along.”

Probably money Probably some promised deal that will never materialize, not in 1000 years or down below gets colder than a polar bear’s bum on the arctic circle. And this lawyer is not the only lawyer I have heard sold out this month. Another Ms. LR is on the docket for that scam. (They promise opposing counsel if they “go along” they will get more business or the coveted fee petition paid 100%. I propose asking your attorney if their fees are cut by about 80 to 100% like mine–see the Janie Thomas case where they cut my fees 100% and the OPG was proud of this nefariousness, then your lawyer isn’t doing his or her job) In Olson, for keeping a man in his own home for 1.5 years, I got a fee cut of 80%. Go ahead, ask your lawyer if they are part of the problem or part of the solution. Not being paid in probate is the golden ticket of honesty.

So, I will say this again, why put up with an attorney like that who will not remind the court of the law, each and every time an issue is brought up.

In this case, mom repeatedly says she wants to go home. At least 3 attorneys are ignoring her pleas. The law is, if a senior wants to go home, they get to go home.

I asked Mr. IL if his attorney put that in writing and filed it with the court. Answer: no.

The GAL’s have also told Mr. IL they want 100% of his joint account. I want to know why, after 2 years of litigation that account has not been partitioned with him getting half? Son responded “I don’t care about the money.” But the reality is, yes, you do because without your mother sitting on a pile of cash, the miscreants won’t go away. They will drain, and drain and drain. Got it? The money also puts you in control. Sorry about your altruistic attitude, but if you want to get them to follow the law and do what they’re supposed to do, lack of money on the 18th floor is a fine motivator.

The son has given me permission to publish and name names. But the reality is, I’m not sure he’s ready for the backlash. Further, names aren’t all that important on this blog. I hear story after story of the same issues, facts and outcomes.

There is no Santa Claus on the 18th floor and if an attorney promises you your loved one back in 6 months for a payment of cash in fees (made up), it won’t happen. 2 years later this son is sitting with his mother in a locked down facility begging to go home.

Again, if you want to avoid the 18th floor, put your money off shore. Sell the home and lease it back. Get certificates of competency on a regular basis prepared to send to the court until they give up. Buy an RV and leave the state. The rats nests are on a county by county basis, far as I can tell and as John Wyman will tell you, there is no cooperation between these thieves.

Most of all, keep on praying for our cause to clean up the courts. With your prayers each night pray for the court corruption victims and pray for truth and justice. Just add it to your prayers and meditation.

Thanks for listening. Despite what the ARDC claims, this blog is the truth and the whole truth and I will take a polygraph to prove it any day. Ask Jerome Larkin to do the same. He’ll never show. Ask Ken Ditkowsky to do the same. He’ll come with bells on and pass it with flying colors.

JoAnne

A link to a show for Joanne Denison on Cooper’s Corner and Elder Cleansing

Posted on August 19, 2014 by jmdenison

Please watch and see how the probate court fostered the terrorizing of 99 year old Alice Gore pulling 27 gold teeth and how Bev Cooper and her loved ones were devastate by all of this.

If you have not seen Mr. Lanre Amu’s program, you should do so now, he details the agony of being suspended for merely telling the truth, breaking the code of silence, and protecting his own clients, who were ordinary people, like you and I, who had no clout, but the other lawyers and their clients apparently did:

A LINK to Ken’s recent appearance on Cooper’s Corner where he discusses his plea to the US Supreme Court to SAVE HIS LAW LICENSE

Posted on August 19, 2014 by jmdenison

I’ve respectfully requested a meeting for the families of the victims of elder cleansing. I have not received a response. This is an acute problem that is akin to the 9/11 attack on America. The distinction is the fact that the perpetrators are people in responsible positions whose amoral agenda is a cancer attacking our core values.

From JoAnne:

Ken has written Atty Eric Holder for a hearing on “elder cleansing” or probate court abuses of the elderly and their families.

We have not received a response yet.

Please pray for this and also email Mr. Holder at “askdoj@doj.gov”

thanks

08 06 14 Ken Ditkowsky



				08 06 14 Ken Ditkowsky

				View on youtu.be	Preview by Yahoo

Ken Ditkowsky

Ken Ditkowsky appears AGAIN on Cooper’s Corner

Posted on August 19, 2014 by jmdenison

and here is the link:

08 06 14 Ken Ditkowsky



				08 06 14 Ken Ditkowsky

				View on youtu.be	Preview by Yahoo

Ken Ditkowsky

enjoy!

From Ken Ditkowsky–how bad is it when you search on the “C” word?*

Posted on August 15, 2014 by jmdenison

Just a little internet searching, and what do we find! Dozens of amazing and relevant articles.

I don’t know about you, but I had not heard of several of these stories! Kudos to the news outlets for bringing this waste to the attention of hard working taxpayers.

JoAnne

* for most of you out there, the “C” word that puts dread, death and destruction automatically in our minds is, of course, “cancer”. But for the ARDC is it clearly “Corruption”–a task they refuse to take on or conduct honest and comprehensive investigations of, despite the fact that is their only job they promised to the public. So we can’t mention “corruption” on this website, we can’t talk about it–the ARDC says if a lawyer talks about corruption on her website, that is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater (Atty Melissa Smart, litigator for the ARDC).

so what do we do? I will just tag everything “not corruption” just like the ARDC wants.

Ken was asked if he was sorry, at his trial, for quoting in his private emails to probate court victims, a GAO report from the US government–that reported that guardianships were not properly supervised, they were a hotbed of problems and that rarely, if ever, is anything done to stop the court sponsored corruption, terrorizing of the ward and his family, thefts by tied in individuals and proper oversight.

Reporting on the truth is grounds for disbarment or severe sanctions from the ARDC. According to them, it is better for a lawyer to steal $100,000 (Karavidis–no discipline, a private matter) and breach a fiduciary responsibility, than to tell the truth about guardianship (Ditkowsky at age 78 a 4 year suspension). To date, the ARDC will NOT post a link to the letter that they claim was misleading AND they refuse to provide proof of service and jurisdiction in the case of Mary G Sykes, 09 P 4585.

I will NOT be one of the attorneys practicing a “code of silence” fostered and promoted by the ARDC to protect its own (eg, see Seth Gillman, indicted for $90 million in health care fraud, but shown on the ARDC website as follows:

LAWYER SEARCH RESULTS

ARDC Lawyer Search Results from the ARDC database last updated as of August 18, 2014 at 1:10:46 PM: for the following terms: Last Name: gillman, First Name: seth, status: All

Name	Date Admitted	City	State	Authorized to Practice?
Seth Gillman	November 4, 1993	Lincolnwood	IL	Yes

See ken’s search of
“cook county corruption”–offically banned by the ARDC

Cook County Corruption

Page: 1 2

Cook County Official Hired Niece For Six-Figure Job

| Robert Herguth/BGA and Dane Placko/FOX 32 | Posted 07.17.2013 |Chicago

This story is courtesy of the …

County Doctor Gets Big Payout For No Work

NBC Chicago | Posted 01.11.2012 | Chicago

A former Stroger Hospital doctor was given checks amounting to six figures with no work to show for it, an NBC Chicago / Better Government Association…

County Assessor Gives Daughter $10,000 Raise Despite Budget Crisis

Posted 07.23.2011 | Chicago

Even as the county ethics board investigates Joe Berrios’ hiring of family members, the Cook County Assessor gave his daughter a $10,000 pay raise, th…

Report: Sex, Booze, Sleeping On The Job At Cook County Water Parks

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.26.2011 | Chicago

A mini-water park run by the Cook County Forest Preserve allegedly became a personal playground for staffers who boozed it up, had sex or just napped …

Ex-Todd Stroger Aide Gets Jobless Pay Despite Corruption Charge

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A former top Cook County official awaiting trial on public corruption charges has been collecting unemployment benefits despite her arrest, county off…

Chicago Democrat Fires 53 Employees, Hires Friends And Family

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Even before he won the Cook County Assessor seat, Democrat Joe Berrios was taking Cook County nepotism to a whole new level. While most government wor…

Report: Joe Berrios A ‘Vivid Example’ Of ‘Clout-Infested Politics’

Chicago Magazine | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Berrios stands as a prime example of the kind of closed, self-interested politics that plagues this state. The Board of Review, where he has spent the…

Todd Stroger’s Shady Hiring Practices Highlighted In New Report

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Todd Stroger’s staff bent or broke county hiring rules to put supporters on payroll and fire naysayers, according to a scathing report released Tuesda…

Four Cook County Officials Busted In Corruption Sting

NBC Chicago | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A group of suburban public servants were arrested Tuesday in a corruption probe looking allegations they profited from their positions. …

Mayor’s Brother Calls Stroger Aide Contract Scandal A ‘Disgrace’

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Sounding a bit like his brother, the usually measured Cook County Commissioner John Daley called the unfolding contract scandal in County Board Presid…

Calvin Boender Found Guilty: Developer Convicted Of Bribing Alderman

NBC Chicago | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A federal jury has convicted a Chicago developer of bribing an alderman in exchange for his support on a West Side project. Calvin Boender was foun…

Cook County Corruption Report: 150 Top Officials Convicted In 140 Years

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

It’s no mystery that Cook County has had its share of political corruption, but a study released Thursday puts it into perspective: 150 top Cook Count…

Court Clerk Charged With Taking Bribe To Sway Case

STNG | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

As part of an ongoing investigation into financial corruption, a Cook County Circuit Court clerk was arrested Wednesday for allegedly accepting a brib…

Corruption Charges: Cook County Suburban Schools Supt. Arrested

southtownstar.com | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Regional Supt. Charles Flowers was charged today with theft by the Cook County state’s attorney’s office. At a news conference this afternoon, Coo…

Frivolous Lawsuits Costing Cook County Millions: Study

Daily Herald | Ted Cox | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

An Illinois legal-reform group released a study Wednesday suggesting Cook County is squandering millions of dollars annually with a lax approach to fi…

Over $11M In Cook County Contracts Went To Political Donors

Daily Herald | Rob Olmstead | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A joint investigation by the Daily Herald and the Better Government Association has found that the companies that received the 11 contracts worth $11….

Sheriff Sets Up Suburban Government Corruption Unit

WBBM Newsradio | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

[Cook County Sheriff Thomas] Dart has formed a new Financial Crimes/Public Corruption Unit, the first of its kind in the sheriff’s office, to investig…

Replacing Quigley on Cook County Board a Lesson in Democracy, Sort of

James Warren | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

When a committee gathered Saturday to fill the Cook County Board vacancy created by spirited reformer Mike Quigley’s ascension to the U.S. Congress, it was no surprise that talk of a fix was rampant.

Crooked Politicians Costing Illinois $300M In ‘Corruption Tax’: Professor

AP | ANDREA ZELINSKI | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

As taxpayers look down the barrel of a major income tax increase, another tax already is draining their wallets. But this one isn’t found anywhere in …

Some Honesty Regarding the Cook County Craigslist Thing

Craig Newmark | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

“Frankly, Sheriff Dart’s actions mystify me,” said craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster, referencing the private civil suit filed against the online service Thursday by the Cook County (Illinois) Sheriff.

County Employees Paid Overtime On Off Days

Chicago Sun-Times | Mark J. Konkol | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Last winter, Cook County Highway Department maintenance employees called in sick, took vacation or put in for paid time off on the same days they earn…

All I Want for Christmas Is a Modernized Cook County Government

Mike Quigley | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Short of absolute dictatorships, my staff and I couldn’t find an example of a more powerful veto anywhere in the world. Why does the president of the Cook County Board have this much power?

Cook County Commissioners’ Back-Door Pay Raise

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Cook County Commissioners are paid $85,000 per year in taxpayer-funded salary. But they also receive more than $1,200 a month in no-strings-attached …

Cook County’s $3.2 Million Patronage Tab

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

“Cook County will pay more than $100,000 each to four victims of illegal political patronage as part of 108 awards announced Thursday by a court-appoi…

Got Clout?

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Want to know who owes whom in Chicago politics? Connecting the dots just got a lot easier with the creation of CloutWiki, an interactive reference sit…

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Page: 1 Cook County Corruption



				Cook County Corruption Can the attorney who defended Cook County against allegations of illegal political hiring be an independent inspector general? That depends on how yo…

				View on www.huffingtonpost…	Preview by Yahoo

Ken Ditkowsky

Cook County Corruption

Page: 1 2

Cook County Official Hired Niece For Six-Figure Job

| Robert Herguth/BGA and Dane Placko/FOX 32 | Posted 07.17.2013 |Chicago

This story is courtesy of the …

County Doctor Gets Big Payout For No Work

NBC Chicago | Posted 01.11.2012 | Chicago

A former Stroger Hospital doctor was given checks amounting to six figures with no work to show for it, an NBC Chicago / Better Government Association…

County Assessor Gives Daughter $10,000 Raise Despite Budget Crisis

Posted 07.23.2011 | Chicago

Even as the county ethics board investigates Joe Berrios’ hiring of family members, the Cook County Assessor gave his daughter a $10,000 pay raise, th…

Report: Sex, Booze, Sleeping On The Job At Cook County Water Parks

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.26.2011 | Chicago

A mini-water park run by the Cook County Forest Preserve allegedly became a personal playground for staffers who boozed it up, had sex or just napped …

Ex-Todd Stroger Aide Gets Jobless Pay Despite Corruption Charge

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A former top Cook County official awaiting trial on public corruption charges has been collecting unemployment benefits despite her arrest, county off…

Chicago Democrat Fires 53 Employees, Hires Friends And Family

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Even before he won the Cook County Assessor seat, Democrat Joe Berrios was taking Cook County nepotism to a whole new level. While most government wor…

Report: Joe Berrios A ‘Vivid Example’ Of ‘Clout-Infested Politics’

Chicago Magazine | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Berrios stands as a prime example of the kind of closed, self-interested politics that plagues this state. The Board of Review, where he has spent the…

Todd Stroger’s Shady Hiring Practices Highlighted In New Report

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Todd Stroger’s staff bent or broke county hiring rules to put supporters on payroll and fire naysayers, according to a scathing report released Tuesda…

Four Cook County Officials Busted In Corruption Sting

NBC Chicago | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A group of suburban public servants were arrested Tuesday in a corruption probe looking allegations they profited from their positions. …

Mayor’s Brother Calls Stroger Aide Contract Scandal A ‘Disgrace’

Chicago Sun-Times | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Sounding a bit like his brother, the usually measured Cook County Commissioner John Daley called the unfolding contract scandal in County Board Presid…

Calvin Boender Found Guilty: Developer Convicted Of Bribing Alderman

NBC Chicago | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A federal jury has convicted a Chicago developer of bribing an alderman in exchange for his support on a West Side project. Calvin Boender was foun…

Cook County Corruption Report: 150 Top Officials Convicted In 140 Years

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

It’s no mystery that Cook County has had its share of political corruption, but a study released Thursday puts it into perspective: 150 top Cook Count…

Court Clerk Charged With Taking Bribe To Sway Case

STNG | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

As part of an ongoing investigation into financial corruption, a Cook County Circuit Court clerk was arrested Wednesday for allegedly accepting a brib…

Corruption Charges: Cook County Suburban Schools Supt. Arrested

southtownstar.com | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Regional Supt. Charles Flowers was charged today with theft by the Cook County state’s attorney’s office. At a news conference this afternoon, Coo…

Frivolous Lawsuits Costing Cook County Millions: Study

Daily Herald | Ted Cox | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

An Illinois legal-reform group released a study Wednesday suggesting Cook County is squandering millions of dollars annually with a lax approach to fi…

Over $11M In Cook County Contracts Went To Political Donors

Daily Herald | Rob Olmstead | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

A joint investigation by the Daily Herald and the Better Government Association has found that the companies that received the 11 contracts worth $11….

Sheriff Sets Up Suburban Government Corruption Unit

WBBM Newsradio | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

[Cook County Sheriff Thomas] Dart has formed a new Financial Crimes/Public Corruption Unit, the first of its kind in the sheriff’s office, to investig…

Replacing Quigley on Cook County Board a Lesson in Democracy, Sort of

James Warren | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Crooked Politicians Costing Illinois $300M In ‘Corruption Tax’: Professor

AP | ANDREA ZELINSKI | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

As taxpayers look down the barrel of a major income tax increase, another tax already is draining their wallets. But this one isn’t found anywhere in …

Some Honesty Regarding the Cook County Craigslist Thing

Craig Newmark | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

County Employees Paid Overtime On Off Days

Chicago Sun-Times | Mark J. Konkol | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Last winter, Cook County Highway Department maintenance employees called in sick, took vacation or put in for paid time off on the same days they earn…

All I Want for Christmas Is a Modernized Cook County Government

Mike Quigley | Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Short of absolute dictatorships, my staff and I couldn’t find an example of a more powerful veto anywhere in the world. Why does the president of the Cook County Board have this much power?

Cook County Commissioners’ Back-Door Pay Raise

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Cook County Commissioners are paid $85,000 per year in taxpayer-funded salary. But they also receive more than $1,200 a month in no-strings-attached …

Cook County’s $3.2 Million Patronage Tab

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

“Cook County will pay more than $100,000 each to four victims of illegal political patronage as part of 108 awards announced Thursday by a court-appoi…

Got Clout?

Posted 05.25.2011 | Chicago

Want to know who owes whom in Chicago politics? Connecting the dots just got a lot easier with the creation of CloutWiki, an interactive reference sit…

Page: 1 Cook County Corruption



				Cook County Corruption Can the attorney who defended Cook County against allegations of illegal political hiring be an independent inspector general? That depends on how yo…

				View on www.huffingtonpost…	Preview by Yahoo

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Simple Request to the Attorney General of the US–Eric Holder on behalf of all courtroom victims

Posted on August 14, 2014 by jmdenison

August 13, 2014

Attorney General of the United States

Washington, D.C

Re: Elder Cleansing Scandal

Dear Attorney General Holder

Early this month I wrote you to request a meeting on this issue. I would like to renew my request for a meeting here in Chicago so that the Midwestern victims and their families can have an opportunity to discuss the blatant Human Rights violations that are being promulgated by corrupt judicial officials (including lawyers) and which violations are being protected by the vary entities and people who are assigned to protect the public.

Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 on behalf of the victims of Elder Cleansing and their families I have been forwarding to you e-mails that I received that are chilling. The victims who have written me are from all over the United States, but they essentially write the very same thing, to wit:

1) A loved one being herded and railroaded into a wrongful and abusive guardianship

2) The guardians segregating the victim from his/her family so that the estate can be ravaged

3) When the estate is rendered insolvent the victim is subjected to a process that extracts the last dollar that can be salvaged and then killed.

4) If the family is articulate and complains they are retaliated against.

Elder Cleansing is part of the outrageous health care frauds that are rendering any and all attempts to provide affordable health care impossible. This is a current National problem that threatens to get out of hand if not addressed. I personally believe that this scandal is related to the Hospice/Nursing home frauds. Those frauds are related to the Omnicare and other supplier frauds that drive up the costs of health care.

The venality of the miscreants in the Elder Cleansing scenario is outrageous. As everyone get old and can become vulnerable it is apparent that this cancer is not going away and is metastatic. Unless we protect the Core values of our civilization from those who value the dollar more than the Bill of Rights we may wake up and find that our America is no more! In the Alice Gore case, the guardian ad litem had the temerity to mine the teeth of victim Alice Gore so as to squeeze the last penny out of her estate! No one is safe.

Warm regards,

KKDitkowsky

Ken Ditkowsky