NOW Pre Order Galley Copies of Theresa Tozzo Lyle’s Book 65 Minutes, a tale of Murder and Torture in Guardianship

Pre sales Galley copies are $25 each and you can text a check to 773-255-7608, or fax a check to 312-553-1300 or email one to joanne@justice4every1.com or use Facebook debit card transfer to my Facebook Account.

All books signed by one of the authors and inscribed with a blessing.

Teresa’s story is about how she tried to lovingly care for her mother while the probate vultures churned the bills and drained her mother’s estate. Her mother wanted to live at home with Teresa in her final years, but the guardianship court in Florida prohibited it, and nasty, evil Guardians took over her life and her mother’s life.

The book contains pictures of her mother bruised and tortured until the end.

If you have relatives that don’t believe you when they say the guardianship court is just in it for the money and professional guardians are nothing but evil, this is the book for you.

The book will soon be out on Lulu, Amazon and Barnes and Noble, but let me order an advance, numbered copy signed by the author for you now.

We need more of these books and not less. Contact me if you would like to have me help you write a book on your corrupt case and let’s get the word out about guardianship and other corrupt areas of the court system which should be open, transparent and democratic.

JoAnne

From Facebook – FBI resecures 168 children and arrests 300 pimps for human trafficking in Missouri

FBI operation rescues 168 children from sex trafficking, puts nearly 300 pimps behind bars

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A crackdown on child sex trafficking hits close to home. The FBI in Kansas City revealed the results of an investigation Monday, noting that nationwide 50 percent more kids were rescued this year than last.

But authorities say the work to end trafficking is far from over. Often times people think of sex trafficking as a foreign issue, but those in the know say it happens in your own backyard more than you think.

One of the girls picked up in this sweep was picked up right here in Kansas City. Nationally, hundreds of law enforcement agencies participated, resulting in 168 children being recovered and nearly 300 pimps getting arrested.

Another victim was also picked up in Wichita and seven pimps from the region were arrested. The Justice Project assisted with the operation and received the rescued girls.

“We’ve got folks here that have been where you have been. We know what it’s like to suffer from all of these things,” said Justice Project executive director Kris Wade.

“A lot of these children come from areas where they’re just not secure about their surroundings. They feel like they’re not belonging to something,” said FBI special agent in charge Michael Kaste.

Authorities don’t know how many more kids could be in peril. That’s why the community is asked to be vigilant. To know what to look out for, click on these links:

FBI on human trafficking

Hiding in Plain Sight

The Justice Project KC

From Joanne:

We know there are building in Chicago that house human trafficked women and the city does nothing about it. Lawyers do nothing about it. The authorities do nothing about it.

These women are not criminals, but they are victims of human trafficking.

If you know of a place in Chicago where this is happening, let me know and I will report it, again and again and again.

Lawyers know of it, but the ARDC does nothing.

This is a terrible human tragedy that must be reported and stopped.

JoAnne

From Karen Federighi–Day 265 in Guardianship, but more competent than those in the courtroom

Karen Federighi is a 57 year old woman, she is not incapacitated but was forced into an abusive and fraudulent guardianship by her miscreant sisters. She wants her freedom back that was taken away. Her unscrupulous guardian is in control of Karen’s money and life. Her guardian is also a felon! How can a felon control someone’s life when they couldn’t even control their own life.

here is the facebook link to her recent video showing that she is competent:

 

Day 275: The magistrate, every judge, the lawyers, and my formerly incarcerated guardian here in Collier County, FL simply ignores the law, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. No fact checking whatsoever. Decisions based on heresay alone. For 275 days, I have been illegally stripped of all of my civil rights in a 100% illegal, fraudulent, abusive, neglectful, and exploitative probate guardianship. Praying for pmy total freedom and all of my civil rights to be restored. But how? How am I to get free when everyone I have dealt in the court system has no morals, ethics, or conscience?

A new update:

Day 276: Wards of all ages in abusive probate guardianships are denied a healthy diet and often suffer from malnutrition and significant weight loss. From 01/22/16-03/23/16, I had to pawn my possessions for food. From 03/23/16-present, 2 of every 3 of my meals consist of the hotel’s free breakfast, which is great if one is on a vacation and has no dietary restrictions. So, I treat myself to one healthy meal per day. Today, I made pineapple and sweet potato latkes with avocado for dinner. Today, my abusive guardian refused to give me my own money to buy more food. Have to stretch the $7 I have left. Thankful I get to eat this meal while watching the World Series. Go Cubs!

From Joanne;

The video clearly shows that Karen is the victim of a false and abusive guardianship. The guardian in the photo does not care. She is clearly subject to 18 USC sec 4 for failure to report a felony to the authorities.

Karen will have to keep on contacting the FBI and all state authorities. She has been advised to call each day, every day until these false, fraudulent and abusive guardianships end.

And it’s not like we don’t have those problems in Illinois. Jerome Larkin, Administrator and head of the ARDC in Illinois ignores all complaints about attorneys that abuse and fleece the elderly on a daily basis: 99 year old Alice Gore, 29 gold teeth pulled, $1.5 million missing from her estate and the ARDC dismissed all valid complaints and then she was narcotized to death;  Mary G Sykes, 94 years old, $1 million in gold coins missing from the estate, no accounting on the trust or sale of the home, court held proceedings for 5 years without jurisdiction, complaints filed with the ARDC against attorney and all ignored, EXCEPT the ARDC went after honest attorneys that complained–myself and Ken  Then Mary Sykes was narcotized to death.  No investigation despite demands and clear knowledge of the facts.  All discovery of these corrupt, clouted cases quashed.  Ditkowsky and we both received lengthy suspensions for reporting felonies of 3 and 4 years, Alan Frake, drugged with psychotropic drugs and placed in a nursing home against his will, he is in grave danger and all ARDC complaints dismissed.

Illinois is said to be no. 1 in corruption, and with the 20+ videos of innocent unarmed black gunned down in cold blood for no reason at all on the South Side and these videos suppressed for months by the Mayor and the City Attorneys, you can see where the public stands in Illinois. The JIB or Judicial Inquiry Board dismisses valid complaints. The ARDC/Jermone Larkin dismisses valid complaints and does not care. Where are the investigations? The Discovery?  The depositions of the miscreants?  No where to be found in Illinois. Support cleaning up this mess.  Demand Accountability.  Get rid of the psychopaths they have placed at the heads of these agencies.

Do you see anything of accountability on the ARDC website or the JIB website?

The ARDC does not file its mandatory  Ethics Reports.  Many have questionable property records where one person takes out a loan and the other pays it off.  Judges, lawyers and other politicians all have this problem.  We must have outrage and make demands on our public officials, starting with the JIB and ARDC who license and fester crooked, corrupt lawyers and judges. Time to end all of that.  Time to take action.

JoAnne

From the ACLU–Protesters take note of limitations

Today floating around in the chat groups online seems to be some suggestions we should protest in front of the judge’s homes.

Personally, I think if you want to protest against judges you think are crooked or make the wrong decisions contrary to law, the best place is right outside the courthouse or online under the judge’s names and tag their posts with your specific complaints.

But just so everyone knows, apparently Illinois has decided it’s necessary to tailor and regulate the First Amendment right to protest.

From the ACLU:

http://www.aclu-il.org/aclu-report-when-else-can-government-regulate-the-time-place-and-manner-of-protest/

III. C. Targeted sidewalk protests

Protesters often seek to demonstrate on sidewalks abutting a building that contains an audience that would prefer not to hear the protesters’ message. For example, a labor union might picket a worksite that uses allegedly unfair labor practices, or a citizen group might distribute leaflets critical of an elected official in front of that official’s office. Courts have held that the First Amendment protects sidewalk protests targeted at courts, health care facilities, schools, and churches. While a Chicago ordinance prohibits certain protests targeted at churches, the City in 2011 announced it would not be enforcing the policy.

The First Amendment has been interpreted to not protect sidewalk protests targeted at particular homes. An Illinois statute prohibits such targeted residential picketing. However, the First Amendment does protect marches through residential areas that don’t target a particular home.

Further, an Illinois statute prohibits fighting words within 300 feet and 30 minutes of a funeral. Police have enforced this statute against the inflammatory signs of the Westboro Baptist Church (displaying messages such as “thank God for IEDs”) on sidewalks across the street from military funerals. This is not a proper application of the fighting words doctrine, given the unlikelihood of fisticuffs between people across the street from each other. Police probably would not enforce this statute against less inflammatory funeral protests.

Within 50 feet of the entry of a health care facility, a Chicago ordinance bars protesters from approaching within eight feet of another person for the purpose of passing a leaflet, displaying a sign, or engaging in oral protest, education, or counseling. This ordinance is modeled on a Colorado statute that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. These laws typically are enacted in response to anti-abortion protesters, but they limit all manner of messages and messengers near health care facilities. These laws make it difficult to distribute leaflets, and are unnecessary in light of other laws that prohibit blockades, harassment, and the like. These laws do not impact the many forms of protest that do not involve approaching other persons, such as signs, speeches, and press conferences.

I’m not sure an outside the home protest would work.  Most people care more about their email friends from 3,000 miles around the globe than their next door neighbors and those on facebook than anything else nowadays, but you never know what people are thinking.

Joanne

Jill Jones Soderman makes a statement about a con artist who engages in blackmail, a warning about Christine Sirgent

Okay, we all know that they are out there, you know the type, the claimed “victim” that comes to you begging for help but is nothing but trouble themselves.

This blog gets rid of trouble makers by requiring they upload numerous pleadings and we confirm our sources.  However, that was not the case for one activist Jill Jones Soderman and a crazed couple that visited her office looking for help.

First the defamatory post:

https://starzz1990.wordpress.com/

Now Ms. Soderman’s response

 

Christine Sirgent contacted staff of the FCVFC after a brief discussion with me resulted in a denial of engagement of the FCVFC with her BF. The contact took place in April, 2014.

Christine Sirgent’s BF seemed to have been engaged in a long standing, high conflict divorce. I declined taking on the case after a brief phone consultation with him.

Christine Sirgent and her BF called my office, engaged sympathetic staff who persuaded me to provide them with a consultation for the BF. (April, 2014)

I received a carton of court documents related to the divorce of the BF of Christine Sirgent with a check for $1,500. I agreed to review documents, provide a consultation. I did not agree to any further involvement with them beyond that commitment.

I received a fee of $1,500. to provide a consultation based on the papers and one phone consultation with the BF. I agreed to speak with the client individually and jointly by phone to discuss the case status on one occasion. The period of time for phone contact is limited to 1 ½ hours on one occasion.

The office of the FCVFC is in Manhattan at 275 Madison Ave., New York, New York 10016.

The New Jersey Office for the FCVFC is the Child Forensic Safety Center, a private Safe House used for the protection of children and adult victims of Violence. (see attached incorporation documents). The clients dropped off a carton of papers for review at the New Jersey office where they were seen for a few minutes as I opened the box to briefly review the papers.

Services provided by the FCVFC are noted in papers and description attached.

The FCVFC NEVER provides legal representation for clients in high conflict custody cases. Ms. Sirgent was never introduced to an attorney as part of my consultation with her BF.

All of the rambling commentary described by Ms. Sirgent in her web site is thoroughly and completely incomprehensible

No letter was ever prepared or sent to a judge on behalf of for Ms. Sirgent’s BF.

I am aware of a letter having been sent to a judge dealing with Ms. Sirgent’s BF because the judge’s clerk called me to ask if the BF was a client of the FCVFC as she thought he was using the name of the FCVFC falsely and she intended to put him in jail. I dissuaded the court clerk from seeking jail time for the BF.

After the call from the Judge, I contacted Ms. Sirgent and told her that I was terminating all contact with her and her BF and would never agree to any further contact / work with them via the FCVFC.
I kept the BF from being jailed because of false representation of engagement with the FCVFC and intended to have no further dealings with either of them.

Following that interaction I continued to receive an incessant barrage of threatening letters and e mails from Ms. Sirgent and her BF. The e mails were referred to junk mail. Phone calls were never accepted.

I became aware of Ms. Sirgent through her web site when it appeared on Google defaming me.

I sought consultation with numerous attorney and was constantly told that there was nothing that I could with regard to having Ms. Sirgent take down her web site.
As far as I knew, the BF was homeless, had absolutely no funds.

Ms. Sirgent was unemployed, but I had no address for her and she was not the intended client.

I have ignored Ms. Sirgent and her BF, responding to their defamatory, libelous, false communications by publishing about them in the USWhistleblower – the on line press for the

 

 

Jill Jones Soderman makes a statement about a con artist who engages in blackmail, a warning about Christine Sirgent

MaryGSykes.com

Okay, we all know that they are out there, you know the type, the claimed “victim” that comes to you begging for help but is nothing but trouble themselves.

This blog gets rid of trouble makers by requiring they upload numerous pleadings and we confirm our sources.  However, that was not the case for one activist Jill Jones Soderman and a crazed couple that visited her office looking for help.

First the defamatory post:

https://starzz1990.wordpress.com/

Now Ms. Soderman’s response

Christine Sirgent contacted staff of the FCVFC after a brief discussion with me resulted in a denial of engagement of the FCVFC with her BF. The contact took place in April, 2014.

Christine Sirgent’s BF seemed to have been engaged in a long standing, high conflict divorce. I declined taking on the case after a brief phone consultation with him.

Christine Sirgent and her BF called my office, engaged sympathetic staff…

View original post 545 more words

Jill Jones Soderman makes a statement about a con artist who engages in blackmail, a warning about Christine Sirgent

Okay, we all know that they are out there, you know the type, the claimed “victim” that comes to you begging for help but is nothing but trouble themselves.

This blog gets rid of trouble makers by requiring they upload numerous pleadings and we confirm our sources.  However, that was not the case for one activist Jill Jones Soderman and a crazed couple that visited her office looking for help.

First the defamatory post:

https://starzz1990.wordpress.com/

Now Ms. Soderman’s response

 

Christine Sirgent contacted staff of the FCVFC after a brief discussion with me resulted in a denial of engagement of the FCVFC with her BF. The contact took place in April, 2014.

Christine Sirgent’s BF seemed to have been engaged in a long standing, high conflict divorce. I declined taking on the case after a brief phone consultation with him.

Christine Sirgent and her BF called my office, engaged sympathetic staff who persuaded me to provide them with a consultation for the BF. (April, 2014)

I received a carton of court documents related to the divorce of the BF of Christine Sirgent with a check for $1,500. I agreed to review documents, provide a consultation. I did not agree to any further involvement with them beyond that commitment.

I received a fee of $1,500. to provide a consultation based on the papers and one phone consultation with the BF. I agreed to speak with the client individually and jointly by phone to discuss the case status on one occasion. The period of time for phone contact is limited to 1 ½ hours on one occasion.

The office of the FCVFC is in Manhattan at 275 Madison Ave., New York, New York 10016.

The New Jersey Office for the FCVFC is the Child Forensic Safety Center, a private Safe House used for the protection of children and adult victims of Violence. (see attached incorporation documents). The clients dropped off a carton of papers for review at the New Jersey office where they were seen for a few minutes as I opened the box to briefly review the papers.

Services provided by the FCVFC are noted in papers and description attached.

The FCVFC NEVER provides legal representation for clients in high conflict custody cases. Ms. Sirgent was never introduced to an attorney as part of my consultation with her BF.

All of the rambling commentary described by Ms. Sirgent in her web site is thoroughly and completely incomprehensible

No letter was ever prepared or sent to a judge on behalf of for Ms. Sirgent’s BF.

I am aware of a letter having been sent to a judge dealing with Ms. Sirgent’s BF because the judge’s clerk called me to ask if the BF was a client of the FCVFC as she thought he was using the name of the FCVFC falsely and she intended to put him in jail. I dissuaded the court clerk from seeking jail time for the BF.

After the call from the Judge, I contacted Ms. Sirgent and told her that I was terminating all contact with her and her BF and would never agree to any further contact / work with them via the FCVFC.
I kept the BF from being jailed because of false representation of engagement with the FCVFC and intended to have no further dealings with either of them.

Following that interaction I continued to receive an incessant barrage of threatening letters and e mails from Ms. Sirgent and her BF. The e mails were referred to junk mail. Phone calls were never accepted.

I became aware of Ms. Sirgent through her web site when it appeared on Google defaming me.

I sought consultation with numerous attorney and was constantly told that there was nothing that I could with regard to having Ms. Sirgent take down her web site.
As far as I knew, the BF was homeless, had absolutely no funds.

Ms. Sirgent was unemployed, but I had no address for her and she was not the intended client.

I have ignored Ms. Sirgent and her BF, responding to their defamatory, libelous, false communications by publishing about them in the USWhistleblower – the on line press for the FCVFC.