Yesterday I received a bit of input informing me that the issue is no longer if, but when.  I do not know if the source has any credibility but a great number of people are starting to realize that ‘elder cleansing’ is a serious cancer that if it is not eliminated could cripple – if not destroy – America.    The ‘coverup,’ ‘intimidation,’and ‘ retaliation’ by corrupt public officials such as Jerome Larkin is metastatic.    Larkin not only encourages, aids, abets, acts in concert with the felons, but, provides official protection for their venal activities.  (NB.  In the Sykes case 09 P 4585 there still has been no attempt to vest the Court with Jurisdiction.  In fact, it has not been discussed at all in court, other than to deny that Mary was never served with summons and complaint!)   A  5 ILCS 5/11a – 10 type hearing has never been held!

It is quite humorous in that all Larkin had to do to CYA was to demonstrate a scintilla of pretended good faith and join in the call for an Investigation.   Instead, at the request of Cynthia Farenga and Adam Stern, JL set up a kangaroo court to retaliate against the call.   Most seriously, the continued prosecution of JoAnne Denison for owning and operating a blog that joins in the call to do a clean up of dirt in the court system on her blog is not only outrageous but a demonstration of lack of respect for the core values of the United States.   Just how deep the cancer has penetrated will be disclosed in the future –

Larkin and the Illinois Courts are aware that the Supreme Court of the United States has addressed the issues a number of times, to wit:

Private right of action implied by Title IX ( 20 U.S.C.S. §§ 1681 et seq. ) for victims of sex discrimination by recipients of federal education funds held to encompass  claims  of  retaliation  for complaining about sex discrimination.     Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 544 U.S. 167, 171, 125 S. Ct. 1497, 1502, 161 L. Ed. 2d 361, 361, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2928, 1, 73 U.S.L.W. 4233, 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 669, 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41,871, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 193 (U.S. 2005)

The same principle applies to ADA violations and First Amendment matters. I hope the information that I received yesterday is accurate and will result in at least one massive festering tumor being removed.   The actions of Larkin in mistreating the victims and families of elder cleansing and attempting to silence lawyer cries of corruption are not only disingenuous but reduce him to the below the nadir of society!

Larkin must be made an example of so that in the future public officials who are paid to protect the public realize that the public they are to protect is the victims of dishonest judicial corrupters.    It should be noted that even at this late date, Larkin has not used his agency to investigate the Sykes case, the Gore case *****.   He has been granted wide supboena powers by the Illinois Supreme Court, yet he fails to use them, except to suppress a blog that disseminates facts and information regarding the frauds perpetrated in the Illinois court system.  He has instead used his agency in concert with the felons who prey on the elderly and the disabled.