then go to go fund me and make a donation to Patty and her blind son for her courageous efforts in fighting corruption in Florida

http://www.gofundme.com/bd2w8mty

Another family who carefully cared for their handicapped, special needs son all his life has the son ripped from them, all because they reported a federal agent for covering up cocaine sales to a judge!

The penalty for being a whistleblower in Florida, if you are a woman, is to have your children ripped from your care and your visitation.

Another similar story is Patty Reid, now in hiding from the law, because she testified for Barbara Stone, another whistleblower in a case where Roy Lustig, attorney and Michael Genden, knew of severe abuse to Helen Son (rushed to ER with contusions, lacerations, pneunomia, bed sores, rashes, dehydration and malnurtrition, spent 3 weeks in the hospital) and incredulously Judge Genden returned Barbara’s complaints of abuse right back to the abusers–Atty Lustig and Guardian Lapides.  The day after Patty Reid testified that Lustig was a liar and abuser, her parental visitation rights were terminated.  She has left the state.

Please watch these two brave women who bucked the system and do what is right and for this they isolate them from their precious children.

Please pray for Helen Stone who has gone up and beyond her call of duty to stop corruption in the system of Florida by writing countless documents, pleadings and filing grievances with the judges, the courts, the judicial inquiry boards, the attorney disciplinary boards.  You name it, she has done it all to protect her mother.  And every time she finds more corruption and reports it, or more abuse and reports it, they jail her!

Right now Barbara is in jail and it’s for who knows what.  Typically, when Genden gets mad he calls his buddies at the state’s attorneys offices and makes a complaint and then they arrest  Barbara for “interferring with the care of disabled”, meaning she reported abuse.

Please pray for all these brave ladies.

thanks

joanne

PS–it should be noted that in mid-eastern countries when women fight for equal rights, the authorities likewise take away custody of the woman’s children.  It is indeed a sad day when you have to explain to a disabled person, a senior citizen or your own child that you are going to report corruption and fight it and therefore they must be prepared they might not see you again for a long time or ever, but it is something you have to do.

The code of silence is not working.

An article by Terry Schiavo’s brother.  Terry Schiavo (like many of our seniors narcotized to death) had no diagnosis.  She didn’t voluntarily enter hospice to die, she was an involuntary assisted suicide sanctioned by a judge knowing not what he did.

I Will Never Forget the Look of Horror on My Sister Terri Schiavo’s Face the Day She Died

The story is graphic and tells exactly what it looks like to have a sweet, vunerable woman die of dehydration and malnutrition over 10 days after her feeding tube was removed–BY COURT ORDER.

I’m not Catholic and I realize this is from a RCC website, but it makes correct points.

Someday this judge and all involved will cross over and there they will encounter Terry Schiavo asking why they pulled her feeding tube when all that happened was she was disabled.

This article is dedicated especially to Jerome Larkin, head of the IARDC when complaints were filed by family members to save Alice Gore, Lydia Tyler, Rose Drabik and now our dear Mary G Sykes, the sweetest woman you will meet who did nothing wrong, but when her money ran out (down to $5,000) she was narcotized to death.

The brave soldier Gloria Sykes, fights on for justice for her mother, tho post humous.

Attorneys Larkin, Farenga, Stern, Judges Connors, Stuart and MacCarthy all looked the other way as probate attorneys feasted on Mary’s estate and suppressed discovery on $1 million in valuable coins.  They can easily be found. Everyone in probate and at the ARDC fights it.  $160,000+ went to attorneys fees for Mary. The ARDC can’t deny what they sought to cover up and Ken and I are finally vindicated.  Mary said she wanted to die at home cared for by 2 daughters.  One daughter fought for guardianship and ignored that directive, dragging Mary to Naperville from Norwood Park in Chicago and then selling her home for 25% of value to some tied in real estate company.  Then soon as she got some money spent $97,000 on a nursing home when Gloria cared for Mary in Mary’s own home!  The Farenga-Schmeidel-Stern rip off team then went after Gloria’s own settlement funds for damage to her body, her home and property and of course got it–some $200,000 that went mostly to their attorneys fees.

Mary never wanted any of that.  How about Mary’s wishes?  Is that what Probate court does in Illinois–ignores the wishes of the disabled, in her own handwriting, in validly drawn up Powers of Attorney, in a number of videos posted on Facebook and on Vimeo and then tears apart Gloria?  Shameful Conduct that Larkin and company condones, covers up and supports.  The time is to end all of that.

Some believe our probate courts and ARDC have become hopelessly corrupt. I believe a few removals and escorts out the building of a few key personnel will get others to stand up straight again and yet about a 1/3 of the staff to applaud that justice was finally done when they were afraid to stick their own necks out.

Ken and I and Amu are the only attorneys in 83,000 who have the guts to stand up to this insidious evil and demand something more–that attorneys do their jobs and root out corruption.

Do we need a Terry Schiavo case in Illinois before it gets that far?  A disabled woman who’s feeding tube is removed so ex-hubby can get $800,000 and a judge with a heart of stone?

Why aren’t we requiring our judges and attorneys to take a test for psychopathy before,during and after they take the oath of office?  We have that scientific test now, let’s use it before we destroy all morality and ethics from the Core Values of the US.

We say we are a church going nation, and the Divine Ones clearly demand love, mercy and grace, so why do we expect people with none of that to provide it?

Please put Larkin, Opryszek, Smart, Splitt first down to take the test. Then you can move on to the rest of the IARDC, then to the Judges, then to every attorney and doctor licensed in Illinois.

Crimes against humanity, the elderly and disabled must stop.  The time is now. A call for action and justification of the $20 million + budget of the ARDC is in order.  A call for justification of judges making $150,000 per year or more is in order. Clear the benches of the Daley Center and then move on to 220 S. Dearborn and the federal courts.

If a judge can’t cough up a tear, a bit of sympathy, compassion and understand s/he should not be sitting on the bench and the taxpayers paying for it.  It’s obscene.

Instead of psychiatrists Shaw, Rabin and Amdur declaring every wealthy senior incompetent because they don’t know the name of the President, etc., why are they testing the attorneys and judges in court first for being psychopaths and narcissists?  And then they can undergo the testing.

JoAnne

Recently Barbara Stone was defaulted on a defamation case by Roy Lustig–but only after a Federal judge kicked the same case out of his courtroom in another jurisdiction.

A witness for Barbara Stone in another courtroom as a handicapped child and the judge, in retaliation took all rights from the mother, so she grabbed the child and left Florida.  Let’s pray for them to be safe.

This is Eliot’s response:

Yes Candice, attorneys are threatened when they speak up and write affidavits like Rochlin, Esq. stating Judge Genden threatened her to get off Barbara’s case and then who more bravely testified to same in a Federal Court only to get slapped with a bar complaint for doing the heroic and RIGHT thing as required by her attorney conduct codes.  She deserved it anyway for helping Barbara.  As for Patty who also wrote affidavit in support of Barbara and more important stating her mother’s plight first hand she should also be targeted and fired from the facility where she was giving Helen hope whilst visiting hell and so serves her right that her son is targeted for removal and torture at the hands of another of goons, bet ya saw that coming.  Then local counsel after seeing what happened to the first attorney then refuses to file further pleadings and thereby precluding you from representing Barbara who gets creamed with NO DUE PROCESS and all this sounds so predictable and kosher in our courts, we should all be proud we have such judicious courts.  And then, lest we not forget the judge who basically terrorizes you at the opening of a hearing for a mistake and threatens you repeatedly with big bad sanctions and a smack bottom baby and rudely interrupts your proceedings with your witnesses basically terrorizing them and silencing them with his compassion and kindness.  Oh yeah, let us not forget Judge Pearlman a true pearl of a judge who reviewed Barbara’s pleading and expressed sympathy and the need for Barbara to get protection for her whistleblowing and who was then filed on for disqualification by PIG ATTORNEY ROY LUSTIG, who was found guilty of FRAUD ON A COURT and LYING and more by the 3^rd DCA and thus forced this lovely judge off the case, perhaps a gun went to her head or she was threatened from that Top Judge, ya know Labarga, who disbarred Barbara for her whistleblowing but she deserved it too as she was compassionate to Barbara and so stated on the record.

However, I am shocked you knew people would be targeted for trying to help Barbara, especially since that extortionary behavior is committed by JUDGES and ATTORNEYS who are torturing her mother and her.  And oh, by the way, these esteemed and honorable Judges and lawyers are PSYCHO KILLER CRIMINALS of a mob nature who deserve the respect of the people and Barbara because they are so dignified and act so above the law.  So in a corrupted court system with protection to the top of justice and down, well I guess the odds were good that everyone would cut bait and run from Barbara now that the heat is on, instead of facing sanctions or prison or more to help her, let’s just blame her and Patty and Rochlin.  I guess doing the right thing for Barbara will cost Patty the kid and everyone can say it was her fault for helping Barbara, she deserved it too and her kid.  Just like I have heard in these rants that its Barbara’s fault for speaking truth to power her way, in your FACE, won’t back down.  Or it’s her fault for her not being an obedient girl and playing by the dirty judge murdering her mother for greed, and even worse for her talking back to the judges and exposing them to the bar.  So I guess she had it coming and she should have her mother murdered for that and she should rot in prison and we can all say well her mother had it coming for Barbara’s acts and Barbara should have done what all the others here do and watch their loved ones killed and their families wealth stolen instead of rocking that apple cart or making the big bad judge mad.   Makes me wonder if those affidavits everyone says do nothing and showing up in court in support that everyone is too busy for may actually be having profound effect in Barbara’s case in showing how scary and dangerous these mobsters are and how they will retaliate against anyone in their way.  This is why they need to be put down like rabid dogs, as in criminally tried, convicted, fried and then stripped of all their ill-gotten gains.  Makes me think of what heroes all these people who stood in support of Barbara and did the right thing and did not cower like you and do not turn on her now but in fact yell louder and fighter harder at any cost and for that Patty is added to my HEROIC PATRIOTS, anyone else wanna join?  Now my question is who is not afraid to help Barbara and fear no evil or repercussion and be next up to be hunted by the judges and corrupted to the core lawyers (criminals disguised as lawyers who fear the light and exposure?

Anyone of the disbarred lawyers or lawyers in this rant want to help Patty Pro Bono on character, I know she needs it bad. eb

from Eliot Bernstein.

Please note, I constantly have to remind these victims who are terrorized by corrupt officials, judges and attorneys that they are NOT responsible for anyone’s evil or bad deeds.  As Sarah Barrielles says, “what good has silence ever done you?” and she wants us to speak the truth and be Brave too.

Too many victims feel guilty when they stand up to crooked judges, attorneys, a probate system, their idiot family members who shut up and look the other way in a feeble “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” manner that creates and fosters a code of silence.

Well, 18 USC sec 4 does not allow ANYONE to shut up when a string of felonies are being committed.  Many lawyers, in fact, recently have been proseucted by the feds for shutting up when they knew a crime was being committed and did not report it. (Note the atty disciplinary boards and esp. Jerome Larkin in Illinois loves it when lawyers shut up when they see a string of felonies in probate.  It seems this is the real definition of “probate exception”–let judges and attorneys steal and abuse and do nothing.

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 USC sec 4

I and this blog continually relay information concerning the corruption in US governement with a string of emails to the FBI.  You too can send along your concerns to: askdoj@usdoj.gov or get the local FBI office email for a particular dept. by calling them. You should be able to get an email to court corruption and to civil rights.  If you are a victim, go there with a list of the statutes violated and demand to file a complaint and don’t leave until you get a complaint number.  That complaint number will give you victim’s rights.  It might be worthwhile to hire a lawyer to draft up a criminal complaint to hand to the FBI so all they have to do is investigate and then file with your affidavit or declaration the statements are true.

thanks

joanne

from Candice Schwager:

If I ever had a question about Barbara Stone’s case I’d say the Defendants have cleared it up. My witnesses have been threatened and retaliated against for testifying and to keep them from helping Barbara. Her criminal lawyer was 2000 miles away the day before a critical hearing and told me he was withdrawing immediately. Deborah Rochlins law license was threatened after the judge called her cell. And the day before my federal court hearing everyone left the state on vacation to Alaska and far away destinations. Now a witness has been told they’re taking her son but won’t say where. My local counsel refused to file my pleadings and told me her office was closed down for medical emergency indefinitely

<kenditkowsky@yahoo.com><joanne@justice4every1.com><verenusl@gmail.com><nasga.org@gmail.com><matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>

Subject: Time for an HONEST INVESTIGATION

Throughout history, mankind has been faced with the problem of what do you do with someone when they have lived beyond their useful life.    As most people did not live long, it was a minor problem; however, the advent of modern health care, better nutrition, and a bunch of other factors people started living longer and longer.    The problem is become acute and move and more people suffer heinous illnesses and require greater and greater care.     This problem masks a new industry that has developed.    The least desirable people in our society have discovered respectability without pain and without resort to overt criminal activities.

After WW2 as part of fringe benefit packages companies offered ‘health insurance.’  Suddenly one of the poorest paying professions became one of the most lucrative.    The dedicated physician who donated his time to free clinics for the poor wherein anybody with a problem was welcome disappeared.   The concept that anyone who felt ill could go to the nearest hospital and receive treatment free disappeared to be replaced with insurance cards, Medicaid cards, etc.     The idea of refusing care to a human being was foreign; however, today, the University of Chicago hospitals avoids having a trauma center because it allows it to avoid treating gun shot victims – who might not pay for services.    St. Francis Hospital (where my father and uncle donated thousands of hours of time) will not treat a patient who has no insurance, no welfare card, and no visible way of paying for services.

However, if you could pay the ‘coverage’ of the carrier is the limit.    The twentyfive dollar aspirin is not rare.     Rare is the hospital bill that a patient could pay out of pocket – though individual practitioners are not necessarily compensated dollar for dollar.

The urge of hospitals to be profit centers gave rise to another industry – the nursing home.    This facility at first was a poor relative to the hospital and competed directly with ‘home care.’    Home care being defined as care administered by the family out of love or necessity.      The nursing home industry grew with the advent of insurance and government subsidy.     The hospital still was a profit center, but, the nursing home increased its importance and profitability by in essence becoming an ‘old folks home.’     If Johnny wanted to warehouse grandmother, it and ‘day care centers’ grew into vogue.     Long-term insurance and easy to reach assets made it practical.

(NB.  I am going to assume a degree of knowledge as to the operation of these facilities.    The group of operators who dominate the industry in a particular locale are referred to as the cabal.     These operators are politically savvy, very ‘smart,’ and very knowledgeable.   They hire very clouted lawyers and have the ability to fix any case that might be filed in the Court system.)

The nursing home abuses and role in the saga of ‘elder cleansing’<zzz!–[if !supportfootnotes]–=””>[1]<zzz!–[endif]–> has been a systemic element in the health care industry growth.    Hundreds of seniors find themselves in ‘care’ and are warehoused for the benefit of the nursing home owners.    So competitive is the business that ‘finder’s fees’ are quite common in the industry.   The Federal government watching from the sidelines periodically calls these gratuities “kickbacks” and indicts a small operator.    The program conducted in the nursing home is so foolproof that the criminally insane in many instances are housed right next to grandmother.   Both are drugged out of their skins.

Supply of patients is a problem for the avarice of the operators.     Warehousing costs between $1000.00 to $1500.00 a month and routine nursing home charges are approximately $8000.00 a month.    To keep a supply of patients (at $8000 a month) it is not usual for select lawyers and judges to be selected for rewards.    Investing in a nursing home owned by one of the cabal of top tier operators is also very lucrative.    A limited partner (who invests upwards of $100,000) is usually promised a 16 percent return on investment.     For approximately ten years the profit flows, however, thereafter, it reduces itself dramatically until it is gone.   The original investment is usually returned upon the sale of the facility.

Friends of the cabal are rewarded handsomely.     Enemies are punished.      The corruption is absolute and you are either a friend of an enemy.

The guardianship relationship  755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq (in Illinois) is a vehicle for certain favored lawyers to 1) make a living, 2) service favored nursing homes and hospice facilities, and 3) maintain control in the Courts so that the cabal does not have to reinvent the wheel each time they are sued or a hue and cry is raised as to nursing home conditions.      It is also a method for dishonest lawyers and judges to profit from the troubles of others as well as cash in on the fact that so many of the elderly have large estates that a just prime for the taking.

Starting at square one.

“ Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary in promotion the well-being of the disabled person to protect  him from neglect, exploitation or abuse and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence.   Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessary by the individual’s actual mental and adaptive imitations.  “ (Illinois Probate Act)

The Americans with Disability Act provides for “reasonable accommodation” for the disabled person, and the Constitution worries about due process, liberty, freedom of speech, protection of property etc.     It is very difficult to operate a predatory health care facility or other enterprise under such circumstances, Ergo a new cast of characters  is brought into the mix.     To protect the dishonest judges and lawyers the Attorney Disciplinary Commissions are recruited.      Their job is to protect the miscreants from HONEST investigations by law enforcement.      They do so by filing disciplinary actions against any lawyer who wanders in the Probate Division of the Circuit court and is upset sufficiently to communicate to law enforcement what he observes.

The code of silence is necessary because contrary to the clear statement quoted supra concerning the nature of the guardianship and the Federal limitations of the Americans With Disabilities Act an adjudication of incompetency is a death sentence for the elderly or the disabled person.    The senior or the disabled person becomes a non- person.     Routinely,  the guardian isolates the victim from his/her prior life and family and places the ward (victim) into a facility wherein contact with the outside world is severely limited.    The assets are stripped from the victim and every dime that can be extracted from the victim’s insurance or other benefits is removed.     A dwelling is ordered sold by the dishonest judge, and it is sold to a ‘friend’ of the cabal.     The price is a fraction of the value, thus, when there is a legitimate sale further down the line the gain is a capital gain.    The purchase price of the sham sale is usually awarded to the miscreants as attorney fees.

The Sykes case 09 P 4585 (Circuit Court of Cook County) is a text book example of ‘elder cleansing.      Mary Sykes was an active articulate and very competent elderly lady of advanced years.    She conducted her own banking, drove her own vehicle, and was active in her church and garden club.     Mary discovered that her elder daughter was stealing from her and wound up in the Circuit Court seeking a protective order against the daughter.

This case was ripe for the picking and the miscreants did not miss the opportunity.    The daughter filed a guardianship proceeding after forcibly removing Mary to DuPage county.    The guardian ad litem and the attorney for the daughter orchestrated the guardianship proceeding so that all dissent was eliminated.    755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 is Illinois’ senior protection against such conduct.    It requires 14 days prior notice of any incompetency hearing  to not only the alleged incompetent but the closest family members, i.e. children, spouse, siblings etc.          In the Mary Sykes case – even though 5/11a – 10 is jurisdictional it was totally ignored.     The younger daughter and Mary’s two sisters (siblings) were not notified of any hearing.     In fact no competency hearing was held and no determination as to the degree of assistance Mary might need was ever  made.      The hearing was obviated by an agreement between the petitioner, her attorney and the two guardian ad litem – they got together and submitted a draft order to the corrupt judge who signed it<zzz!–[if !supportfootnotes]–=””>[2]<zzz!–[endif]–>.

When Gloria Sykes complained, one of the guardian ad litem accused her of stealing about a million dollars from her mother.    It appears that Gloria had recovered an insurance settlement from her homeowners carrier and was using the money to repair to covered casualty.      Arbitrarily the GAL claimed that this money was Mary’s and should not be used to repair the home.       Gloria’s attorneys were frightened off.   JoAnne Denison appeared on the scene – she was not frightened so the Guardian ad Litem arbitrarily claimed that she had a conflict of interest – it appeared that she once notarized a document that Mary signed.     Ms. Denison was disqualified.   Some similar technique was used to make certain that Mary was not afforded any legal representation.

The guardian ad litem complained to the corrupt Judge that Mary was agitated when she saw her family, and the Judge ordered supervised visitation.    A corporation related to the cabal was designated as the supervisor.    This corporation’s fees were outrageous and patently obnoxious.    Amongst the charges approved were charges relating to a dog that Mary allegedly owned.    Mary’s assets were expropriated.    Over a million dollars in gold coins disappeared when removed from a safety deposit box.    The Guardian did not have a key because only Mary’s name and Gloria’s name appeared on the box so she drilled out the lock and did not report any of this activity or inventory to the court.  Value antiques and cash disappeared  – they were partially inventoried.  *****

As similar scenario was followed in the Alice Gore case.     The Gore case was particularly horrid as it sunk to some new lows.     The Guardian ad Litem promulgated the prospecting for Gold in Alice’s mouth.  29 teeth were removed so that the gold could be harvested before Alice’s death was arranged.     The family was so carefully isolated from Alice that they did not discover her death for about a week after she died.   Inquiries by family were ignored.    The gold was never inventoried.

The Jaycox case was another Illinois fiasco.     Mr. Jaycox was never incompetent.    He was admitted to a nursing home because there was no one to take care of him and he had severe leg cramps which were debilitating.      It turned out that a benign medication that Jaycox was administered had a side effect of severe cramps.     (Had anyone read the bottle supplied with the medication Jaycox would have been cured).     Jaycox had severe depression as at 80 years old he lost every dime of his substantial estate in a Con scheme.    He and his significant other were essentially wiped out!      Our health care community did not take the time to look for side effects of preventative medications as the cause of Mr. Jaycox’s illness.

The nursing home augmented the problem.     It is common practice for nursing homes to administer chemicals designed to “keep the patient calm.”      Doping is necessary as live people require live caregivers and complain about the quality and quantity of food, housekeeping, and quality of life.    A zombie can be wheeled into the hall and such called Physical Therapy,  or visited by pseudo medical personnel etc.      The ‘dope’ also had a side effect of severe leg cramps.

Thus Jaycox was in agony most of the time.   The cabal (nursing home) found that it was no long before Jaycox’s insurance stopping paying, and a search discovered that his assets were in the hands of a criminal who was being prosecuted for his crimes in the Federal Court.      Thus, a guardianship was called for.     Jaycox was not incompetent, and did not want a guardian.    He hired me.     With my appearance the guardianship started to go South!     It was useless to ‘talk to me’ and intimidating me was already known to be very difficult.     Thus, the miscreants were compelled to go to Court.     Unfortunately, I demanded a hearing and the Judge assigned the case was not going to put her neck on the line.

On the date of the hearing Jaycox fell out of bed and  hit his head.       He could not attend, and I would not waive his presence.    The Judge ordered the hearing to be held in Jaycox’s room at the nursing home.     Fortuitously, a day or so before the hearing Mr. Jaycox again fell and this time he broke his hip.     He was in surgery at Swedish Covenant Hospital.

The hearing was removed to the Hospital.    Jaycox was wheeled into the room, but he was in such pain that he could not testify or observe the proceedings.      The  Shrink who certified that Jaycox was totally incompetent and unable to manage his affairs had made a special trip to the hospital and the Judge wanted to accommodate him.    I agreed.

The hearing was wild.   The cabal’s attorney did not know how to present an expert witness and the Court had no choice but to sustain each objection.    Rather than prolong the hearing the Judge asked me I would object to her examining the witness.   I had no objection.    The Judge did a masterful job of presenting the Cabal’s case and it was very clear that in the opinion of the expert Mr. Jaycox had no mental capacity whatsoever.

When a proceeding is conducted in a manner that follows the rules, even the ‘likes’ of yours truly is afforded the opportunity to ‘play lawyer’ and cross examine the witness.     I did!    I asked a couple of benign questions and then got to business.    A person who undergoes surgery must consent to the surgery.    A hospital cannot helter skelter go around cutting people up.    Thus I inquired as to who authorized the surgery on Mr. Jaycox.     Mr. Expert testified that Jaycox had.     I shut up and moved for a finding.

By that motion, I cost Mr. Jaycox his life!     Robert Jaycox almost immediately contacted an Aspirated pneumonia which is fatal!

There was no inquiry, no protest, quickly Jaycox was cremated and as there was no estate *****.

This is the future!   Unless law enforcement does it job and protects us from the corrupt lawyers, judges, judicial officials and corrupt public officials.     The attempt to shut off protest or discussion of this problem has been very successful.     Lawyers who speak out have their licenses to practice law pulled.    A judge who complains becomes once again a private person.     Law enforcement people who do not toe the line are walking a beat in Far Rockaway.      The time for an HONEST investigation and Honest and vigorous law enforcement is now before it is too late.

The remedy is quite simple.     In Sykes about two million dollars is unaccounted for.    The Department of the Treasury (IRS) and the Illinois Department of Revenue are each owed substantial taxes and penalties by the co-conspirators.   (See 18 USCA 371 for the definition of conspirator).      Each uninventoried dollar most probably was not reported on the 1040 tax form.      Thus, I suspect that substantial income taxes, interest and penalties are due.    Conspirators have joint and several liability not only for the damages, but for the taxes, interest and penalties.     In Illinois Mr. Jerome Larkin and some lawyers employed by the IARDC have committed overt actions in pursuance of the conspiracy.    An assessment of the taxes, interest and penalties (civil) will stop the ‘cover up’ and send a message.  NB.  In civil tax collection the taxpayer has the burden of proof.     Without the protection of Mr. Larkin and the IARDC the miscreants will be at the mercy of the Rule of Law.

Elder cleansing is defined as  a combination of the isolation, abuse, and exploitation of a senior citizen.   It is usually followed by an involuntary assisted suicide.

The Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois could find in his files and in the Court file no evidence that Mary was ever served with summons in the incompetency proceeding.    The particular summons required by 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 was not a printed form of the Clerk of the Circuit Court.    The required summons was never filed in the Court.

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

Why isn’t the NY Bar association audited by an independent auditor to determine that valid citizen complaints are not being routinely dismissed?

Can’t we have that in Illinois?

Ms. Sassower is a second generation whistleblower.  Her father was disbarred for reporting corruption and standing up to a judge where corporate assets went missing and undistributed to those that were owed them.  Her mother was indefinitely suspended without notice, hearing, complaint, trial, appeal or even a chance to appeal. What justice is that?

What an invigorating and eye opening video.  Apparently Ms. Sassower worked for years to get a public hearing. What did they giver her?  Onlly 15 minutes and then the state bar walked out and security came right away to tell her to leave.

This is the treatment the public gets for a shopping cart chock with files that should have been studied?  Honest complaints that should have resulted in discipline?

Shame on the New York bar.

But I like the idea of a public hearing, of public accountability.

In the end, Ms. Sassower had to bet for a few more minutes, but all she got was security to escort her away.  And in the end, the NY State Bar staff walked out on her and did not support her.  The audience applauded her efforts.

What a heronie.  Or wait, was she just one of the few attorneys in NY actually doing her job?

A huge thanks for Eliot Bernstein to send this link to me.

And please watch or hear the 18 min. video then post a comment of support for Ms. Sassower’s wonderful efforts to clean up New York

JoAnne

From the Wall Street Journal yesterday.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/even-speech-we-hate-should-be-free-1440165276

And in the time honored Jerome Larkin, the article describes in detail why Melissa Smart was citing improper case precedent when she started out my trial with this blog is “like yelling fire in a crowded theater”.  Of course, this blog is not the same as that and that standard quote by Justice Holmes was made at the turn of the 19th century and had to do with war time speech and divulging war strategy information.  It since has been replaced with the speech must incite its audience to imminent violence, and in fact do so.

One more case misquote from the ARDC who dismisses out of hand the complaints in the Sykes case (where everyone predicted Mary’s assets would be liquidated primarily for attorney’s fees–they were, she would be put in a nursing home a place she did not want to be–she was, her estate would be drained and then she would be narcotized to death).

This blog is someone wrong.  But killing a senior when the money runs out is not.  Nope, no reason to investigate that.  But we have a long line of cases in Illinois–when the money runs out, the senior must die–Sykes, Tyler, Gore, Drabik, Rector, Jaycocx, Baker, etc.

Seniors that know better run and hide when the money runs out.

Seniors heavily drugged and still at risk and the ARDC looks the other way:  Thomas and Frake.

From Ken Ditkowsky:

I hope someday this blog will turn into an endless string of these.

This week I saw one story in Oregon where a man planned on painting a senior’s home that had become decrepit, put the plan on his Facebook and thousands turned to support him, help paint an and pay for supplies!

Today, Kris Hood (thanks Kris) had on her Facebook the following story and a must watch video:

Home Page

These are seniors learning FaceBook to communicate with their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.  How wonderful is that?

Take a couple of minutes and look at this amazing video trailer of teens teaching seniors who have never used a computer how to write and read email and access Facebook and Youtube where a world of information awaits them.

All good news, all feel good.

We need to stop asking “what’s in it for me” but rather “how can I save the world, one day at a time?”

JoAnne

While the likes of Jerome Larkin and Sharon Opryszek are running around and saying the Sykes case was not a lie and a scam, it was, one brave woman in Florida was able to escape and this got in the mainstream media for a change–abc

http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/i-team-investigates/another-ward-speaks-out-after-spending-nine-years-in-floridas-professional-guardianship-system

Mary Sykes is now dead.  All her money went to attorneys or over priced nursing home bills when she wrote in her POA for health care specifically she did not want to live in a nursing home, she wanted to stay at home.  The Connors-Stuart-MacCarthy team ignored all that, forced her to live in a nursing home and took away all her rights to be and live with her daughter Gloria.

Eventually she was narcotized to death.

The ARDC and Larkin say I was lying, the flying monkeys in probate say I was lying, but the world knows better now.

I am still suspended, but the truth is now out.

The ARDC has turned black into white and white into black–like a house painter.

For Mary G Sykes, the 09 P 4585 proceedings were a death trap in a place she did not want to live, with nearly a million dollars in valuable coins stolen, all discovery quashed, and then she was forced to live in a nursing home–a place she specifically said she did not want to be in.  All the money ran out, and she was narcotized to death.

Mary is now in a far better place, but her poster child like story lives on on this blog, and the ARDC, Jerome Larkin and Sharon Opryszek have not reversed their positions in light of the truth.

Larkin is getting older, and like his brother will be in need of a guardian.  Perhaps the time is now when black is white and white is black for him, protecting all his cronies.

The only one thing the lawyers of Illinois are asking him, and the public also, is to do his job and get rid of all these flying monkeys.  Stop harassing and persecuting those attorneys like myself that work primarily for free for truth and justice and to preserve and protect the US and Illinois constitutions.

Right now, the lawyers he protected in Sykes–the Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel and Waller team have not been investigated and they prey on more elderly and disabled.

The nearly $200,000 legal bill for the Sykes case is a disgrace.  Farenta, Stern, Schmeidel and Fischel and Kahn should be ashamed.  They are a disgrace.  The $87,000 spent on a tied in nursing home (and I would like to see the kickbacks that were paid for this given the fact that Sunrise Park Ridge is advertising a $2,000 kickback for every senior), was specifically prohibited by Mary.  Moving her to Naperville, when she allegedly suffered from dementia was also a disgrace.  As pointed out in a recent article on dementia, why are we isolating seniors and moving them to nursing homes without their permission when in fact, as shown by the monkey with the wire mother experiments of the 50’s (you can youtube these, they’re disgusting animal experiments), seniors and disableds need their families more than ever, to be in their own homes and with the people they have known and loved for years.  If children do not flourish, and in fact go crazy with a wire monkey mother, why do toss our seniors to the “wire monkey caregivers”?

This afternoon I plan on publishing the final accounting in Sykes.  It is a disgrace and nadir of the legal profession.  If anyone doubts her POA specifically prohibits what happened, I will publish that too.

I want subpoenas served in the Sykes case on all sources of income from the GAL’s, I want to see their tax returns for 5 years, I want to see who is paying off any mortgages and loans they have as well as any interests in nursing homes, or beds in nursing homes, etc.

JoAnne

JoAnne

http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/2015/06/casey-kasems-daughter-fights-for-new-guardianship-visitation-laws.html

Kerri Kasem, the daughter of the late American Top 40 DJ, Casey Kasem, has been on a mission to make sure what happened to her and her siblings does not happen to others. When her father’s health deteri  orated from Parkinson’s disease, it sparked an ugly court battle between his children and his wife, Jean Kasem, which did not end until he died.  By then, Casey Kasem was suffering from serious bed sores, a urinary tract infection, and sepsis.  

Kerri Kasem feels that her father’s death could have been prevented if she and her siblings had been able to see him and monitor his care better, but there were not sufficient protections in the law to help.

Like many other adult children in her shoes, Kerri Kasem went to court to be able to see her father and make sure he was protected.  She faced a very difficult time doing so in California.  First, she and other friends and family members of Casey Kasem staged protests outside his house, begging for the right to visit.  Next, Kerri and her siblings filed for conservatorship (which is what guardianship proceedings are called in California), eventually winning the right to visit and have contact with their father, after initially being denied those rights.

Finally, Kerri’s lawyer convinced a California judge to remove Jean Kasem — Casey Kasem’s wife — as his decision-maker, and name Kerri in her place.  Once Kerri was appointed as the conservator, she rushed to try to protect her father.   But, by then, it was too late.  Casey had been moved around to various states, his health deteriorated, and he died shortly thereafter.

Kerri and her relatives pushed for elder abuse charges to be filed against Casey’s widow, Jean Kasem, contending that removing him from a nursing home against medical advice, and moving him around the country, caused or contributed to his death. After Casey died, Jean then had Casey’s body moved to Canada and finally to Norway, where he was eventually buried – without an autopsy having been performed.

Recently, the L.A. District Attorney’s office announced it would not prosecute the case due to lack of evidence of criminal neglect or abuse.

From: Eliot Bernstein <iviewit5@gmail.com>
Sent: Aug 11, 2015 2:04 PM
To: ‘Bill Scheidler’ <billscheidler@outlook.com>

They are not immune from acts outside of the color of law like felony criminal or misdemeanor acts.  This is why I suggest before filing fraud on court or in conjunction go to the local PD department first and file a criminal complaint as Barbara has done against Genden.  Get a FORMAL COMPLAINT NUMBER, make sure they intake properly and DO NOT let them push you to the bar or JQC who have no jurisdiction over criminal matters.  Your criminal complaint should have:

1. Code sections you are complaining about from Statutes, ie Obstruction, Aiding & Abetting, Fraud, etc.
2. Brief description of each crime (usually take code and rewrite to fit to crime against you) and no more than two paragraphs.
3. One to two of best evidence, not all, set traps if you can as you will next be dealing with PD trying to evade investigating judges and attorneys
4. Name and address of each accused party, do not title them unless forced to, so don’t say Judge Genden or attorney Lustig, just names.
5. Tape entire conversation
6. If they refuse intake, move up ladder to supervisors and take notes of what they are saying
7. The process should take NO MORE than 20 minutes
8. DO NOT SELL YOUR WHOLE STORY AT THIS TIME, BREVITY IS THE KEY, you can add to it later and add evidence.  Telling your whole story here will get them room to wiggle out “oh that’s a civil matter” is common evasion, just say the civil allegations are in the civil courts and these are criminal statutes violations that the Civil Court CANNOT touch and demand docketing and intake.
9. Be firm, DO NOT LEAVE WITHOUT FORMAL DOCKETED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT NUMBER
10. Same if you are going to fed with criminal acts.
11. Once that is complete now Fraud on the Court is a part of criminal Fraud too.

Barbara should do another petition to have Michael Genden’s Criminal Complaint investigated according to Florida and US statutes and force PD to investigate now that she is getting run around and claims that Judges are not investigateable and “above the law” but she has done great job of documenting this and this too is a crime.

Comment: I would like to add in, for Fraud on the Court, also go to your local FBI and states attorneys and demand to file a grievance against the court and attorneys involved.  Get a case number and the email for your local FBI office’s court fraud unit AND civil and human rights unit.  Also go to the joint task force on Medicare fraud and file a complaint and get their local fraud unit.  Forcing a person to live in a nursing home when they can live at home with a caretaker there IS medicare fraud.  Killing a senior when the money is gone by narcotizing it is also medicare fraud.  Putting a senior in hospice to die without a diagnosis of an immediately terminal illness so they can be narcotized to death is also medicare fraud.

If the victim is dead, insist that the cororner perform an autopsy and a tox screen for letal levels of opiates and check for dehydration and malnurtrition or evidence the senior was starved to death.  No “guardian” or other relative can narcotize a senior to death or withhold food and water without a court order, and I have never seen anyone either ask for such a court order or any court order be granted to narcotize a ward, or withhold food and water till death.  I have heard of relatives and guardians saying it’s okay to do this, but it’s not–it’s wrongful death.

From: Bill Scheidler [mailto:billscheidler@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:39 PM
To: Barbara Stone; Eliot Bernstein; prayinglory7@hotmail.com; ‘Robert Sarhan’; ‘Deborah Ferris’; corruptcourts@gmail.com; ‘JoAnne M Denison’; Skender Hoti; tmkrautheim@gmail.com; ‘Teresa Lyles’
Subject: RE: Florida State House and Senate: Impeach Michael Genden a probate judge who is using the courthouse to run a racketeering enterprise

Barbara,

It is my belief that we must focus in on the “immunity” doctrine as a “Fraud upon the Court” and is “VOID”.

The GREATEST FRAUD UPON OUR SOCIETY — the “Judicial Immunity Doctrine”

by Bill • August 11, 2015 • 0 Comments

inShare3

Print

Email

Share

Republish

Today we cannot sue certain individuals for the harm they inflict upon their victims because they have one of several types of immunity from suit — “propsecutorial immunity” for prosecutors who fabricate evidence and engage in perjury; immunity for officials engaged in “judicial-type” functions, such as administrative hearing officers; and “immunity” when judges give out immunity to such others as board members and other governing officials.

These “immunities” have their root source in the “judicial immunity” doctrine that was given life by the U.S. Supreme Court in its decision in Stump v. Sparkman 435 U.S. 349 (1978). And once “judges” gave themselves “immunity” they were on the hook to start giving out immunities to others or be exposed. WHY should “others” get immunity if they are not “judges”, you ask? Because the Supreme Court’s ruling is a fraud and those who engage in the act of defrauding need to be protected by others or their fraud will sooner or later be disclosed.

The first group of individuals to be bribed with immunity are prosecutors. And for good reason – although not a legal reason. Prosecutors are the only “ENFORCEMENT” segment of government that can “prosecute” criminals. Clearly if the Supreme Court Judges have committed a criminal act in granting immunity to themselves they risk having a brave Prosecutor sue the judges who established this ‘fraud’ of judicial immunity and send them to jail or at least put an end to the fraud. For this reason the Supreme Court Judges needed to expand their “immunity” to the “prosecutors”. Otherwise “prosecutors” may prosecute the judges for their criminal act in establishing immunity.

What makes the “judicial immunity doctrine” unlawful? The doctrine violates 28 USC 455, which PROHIBITS a judge or “JUSTICE” from sitting in a case in which he or she has an interest, or his or her impartiality may be questioned. Let’s ask this as a questions…. How does a “judicial immunity doctrine” flow from a civil lawsuit in which a “judge” is a defendant? Is it not true that “judges have a direct interest” in the “powers of judges”? If the answer is YES, then all “JUDGES AND JUSTICES” cannot decided such a case because they are “DISQUALIFIED” under 28 USC 455 for the very fact their “IMPARTIALITY” can be questioned due to their “INTEREST” in their own power. Clearly the Supreme Court Judges used the case Stump v Sparkman to further their own powers and immunites — an act that violates 28 USC 455

Our Society has suffered so much because corrupt judges and lawyers get away with unlawful conduct because of the “IMMUNITY DOCTRINE” — the FRAUD UPON SOCIETY.

Once again it seems true that “At the core of our rotten government we find lawyers”!

Regards,

Bill Scheidler

chief activist at www.corruptwash.com

From: bstone575@gmail.com
To: iviewit5@gmail.com; billscheidler@outlook.com; prayinglory7@hotmail.com; drrob2007@yahoo.com; tdferris1@bellsouth.net; corruptcourts@gmail.com; JoAnne@justice4every1.com; skendertravel@hotmail.com; tmkrautheim@gmail.com; tozzolyles@gmail.com
CC: bstone575@gmail.com
Subject: Florida State House and Senate: Impeach Michael Genden a probate judge who is using the courthouse to run a racketeering enterprise
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:49:12 -0400

Hey,
I just signed the petition “Florida State House and Senate: Impeach Michael Genden a probate judge who is using the courthouse to run a racketeering enterprise” and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name.
Our goal is to reach 100 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:
https://www.change.org/p/florida-state-house-and-senate-impeach-michael-genden-a-probate-judge-who-is-using-the-courthouse-to-run-a-racketeering-enterprise?recruiter=272316401&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive&rp_sharecordion_checklist=control
Thanks!
Barbara

Judicial Fraud Upon the Court

Go to WEFT in Champaign website

got to WEFT 90.1 fm

new.weft.orf

Then select how to stream — I just selected TUNEIN

Then select WEFT (Station and your listeing live stream

The interview is live starting at 5:30 p.m. – 6 p.m.

Obviously someone is listening and the flying monkeys better take notice to either leave or dip deeper in those pockets for bribes (and maybe it isn’t worth is any longer?) because the ALJ’s in Medicare complaints are cracking down.

April 10, 2015 case of sykesblog-081015-NMSHealthcarev.CMS-nursinghomerights

the ALJ Kessel made it clear that he would not tolerate violations of Medicare regulations and he fined the facility thousands of dollars for isolating an elderly woman from one daughter based upon a POA from another daughter that the facility enforced.

 However, she eventually cooperated and returned. Id.
The resident was moved to the locked unit of Petitioner’s facility upon her return on January 22, 2014. From that date and thereafter, the resident was confined behind a locked door that denied her egress from the wing on which she was confined and from the facility itself. Petitioner not only confined Resident # 4, it restricted her access to members of her immediate family and to other individuals, including an attorney who sought to provide her with legal counsel. ……………. In November and December of 2013 members of Petitioner’s staff confronted an attorney with whom Resident # 4 was consulting and ordered him to leave Petitioner’s premises. CMS Ex. 67 at 2–3, 38–39. After being confined Resident # 4 complained that she wanted to speak with an attorney but that Petitioner would not allow her to. Id. at 9. Beginning in at least 2012 Petitioner’s staff restricted one of the resident’s daughters from visiting the resident. CMS Ex. 9 at 17, 23, 115.
When interviewed, Resident # 4 expressed a desire to leave the facility and complained about the restrictions on her freedom of movement. CMS Ex. 67 at 40. The resident’s desire to leave was known to Petitioner’s staff. Id. at 13.
The only reference in the resident’s treatment record to the decision to confine her is a social services note dated January 22 that says, laconically: “Resident moved to room 418B.” CMS Ex. 9 at 132. The clinical record suggests no basis for confining Resident # 4 against her will or for restricting her access to family members and an attorney. Nothing whatsoever in the record suggests a change in the resident’s medical or psychiatric condition prior to or on January 22, 2014 that would support confining her. To the contrary, the record of the resident’s mental status shows her to be calm and cooperative and not to be deteriorating in the nearly three years prior to her being confined. CMS. Ex. 9 at 52–110. There is no physician’s report supporting confining the resident or restricting her access to visitors. There is no comprehensive assessment suggesting a need to change her status. Nor is there anything in the resident’s care plan that either records the change in status or addresses how it is to be managed.
5
Similarly, there is no explanation in the resident’s treatment records as to why the particular restrictions employed by the facility were clinically necessary. Why, for example, were certain individuals excluded from the facility? Petitioner has no assessments or explanations of the medical or clinical reasons for this decision.
There is, however, a reason for Petitioner’s actions and it stands without rebuttal. Petitioner confined Resident # 4 and restricted her access to visitors at least in part because Petitioner’s daughter, (“JF”), who held a power of attorney (POA), wanted her mother to be confined and the restrictions to be imposed. Petitioner took the actions it took in part because JF requested that it take them. The only reasonable conclusion that I can draw from the undisputed facts of this case is that Petitioner acted on JF’s desire that her mother be confined without making any determination as to whether confinement and visitor restrictions were clinically justified or whether seclusion and restrictions were the least restrictive and most reasonable means of protecting Resident # 4. CMS Ex. 9 at 17, 23, 115; CMS Ex. 82.

Let’s give a hand to Judge Kessell for being honest about what happens in nursing homes on a day to day basis and how the probate courts across the nation support the isolation and human rights violations of nursing homes on a day to day basis, merely because many nursing homes allow both the judges and the probate attorneys to “invest” in the homes–and not always by means of public stock certificates, and there are kickbacks paid (according to Brightstar owner) of $2,000 to $3,000 per month for any relative who participates in keeping a resident there and isolated against his or her will.

Jerome Larkin knows this and does nothing.  He has $1.2 million in unexplained mortgage payoffs on his public records.  He has been challenged to release bank records showing who paid his mortgages off.  He does nothing.  Same for my prosecutor, Sharon Opryszek.  Not only was she caught witness tampering in the Hogan case and the witness still wants to testify against her (Justine McGinty), but she also has an unexplained $250k mortgage payoff.

None of this is every investigated by the state authorities and Diane Saltoun says she won’t investigate state corruption, but as the Inspector General, she is bound to investigate bribes of state employees and kickbacks.

Read the case, the language is a bright shining star in a sea of depravity at the nursing homes and in our 18th floor probate court and probate courts across the nations.

I think what you wrote is good, but it would help to be more specific for pro se’ers.  For example, most people do not know that you can get a judge recused for the following behavior:

Rude behavior, scoffing at, making noises, making faces while you are talking or saying you cannot speak at all without an attorney and then letting the other side go on and on and on and not letting you respond.

The standard in most jurisdictions for recusal of a judge is that you have a reasonable fear that you will not get a fair trial or hearing and the judge will be biased against you.

Obviously, issuing contempt and Body Attachment orders in a civil case gets you there–those are unconstitutional. Gag orders  or “you must not talk about X” are also unconstitutional and will get you there (motion to recuse).

A recusal is not an admission of wrong doing by a court or the judge–it just gets you another judge that you might find you have to recuse.

Barbara Stone is on a streak of recusals because she wants justice in probate in Miami Dade county.  None of the judges there seem to understand that  probate is not a grab the cash and let the elder suffer and be isolated and drugged and on a feeding tube she does not want.

JoAnne

—–Original Message—–
From: “Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq.” <riccordero@verizon.net>
Sent: Aug 8, 2015 8:24 PM
To: bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com, cdecoursey@gmail.com, janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com, andrew.kreig@gmail.com, joanne@denisonlaw.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net, CorderoRic@yahoo.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com
Subject: Template for presenting case information on judicial wrongdoing

Dear Mr. Grundstein and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

I would most certainly like to have a description of the federal court’s behavior in your case against the WA state bar.

1. Template to present case information on judicial wrongdoing

1. Since you are a lawyer, you can do what pro ses are most unlike able to do, namely, distinguish between, on the one hand, wishful thinking expectations that when not realized are unjustifiably characterized as wrongdoing by the judge, and, on the other hand, either indisputable violations of the law and disregard of material facts or conduct that is so suspicious, for instance, because it entails highly improbable coincidences, as to raise probable cause to believe that the conduct was intentional in disregard of a legal or ethical duty of the court.

2. The above hints at a format for your description that I respectfully suggest to you: a table with substantive columns together with referential ones:

1. description of the case;

1. wrong, suspicious, improper, unethical, and wrongful behaviors;

1. quotation of the text and citation of the legal or ethical provisions that were violated. An unethical behavior can involve, for example, the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges(* >jur:68fn123a);

1. reference to the page of the brief, motion, ruling, decision, or other document introduced in evidence or reliable enough to carry evidentiary value, that supports the claim of wrong or wrongful behavior;

1. name(s) of the judge(s) involved; the address of the court; and their respective phone numbers (to make it easier for independent and impartial third parties, such as journalists(* >ol:250) or the staff of presidential candidates(ol:292) investigating the case, to contact them and ask for their side of the story);

1. text of any question presented on appeal.

All (blue text reference) are found in my study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts, titled:

Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:

Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(* >jur:1)

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

or http://1drv.ms/1IkvhB8

or http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf

.

If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, download either of the following browsers, install it, copy the first link above into the browser search box, and hit ‘Enter’. If the file, which has over 740 pages and is close to 50MB, does not download, try using the other links:

.

Google Chrome:

https://www.google.com/chrome/

or

Mozilla-Firefox:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/firefox/download-and-install.

1. The attached template for exposing judges’ wrongdoing

3. The attachment hereto contains a template for presenting the above information in the form of a table. The information must be concise, to the point, and convincing. A table is a device that allows vast amounts of information to be distilled to its essential elements and to facilitate comparison; see:

1. jur:10, 1, 15, 16

1. jur:31§a

1. jur:65fn107c

1. ol:280 and 282, which are tables proposed as templates.

4. It is not reasonable to expect people, particularly non-lawyers, unremunerated lawyers, and even journalists, to wade through the scores or hundreds of pages of a single case to figure out on their own whatever it is that supports the unsubstantiated allegation of a party, by definition biased to its side of the story, of wrongdoing on the part of a judge…and repeat the process with each of the other cases in a set of cases presented to establish a pattern of wrongdoing of a judge, never mind of all the judges of a court.

5. No judge or judiciary promises to be able and willing to conduct a perfect trial, but only one that is fair and impartial. Likewise, not every minute error or mistake amounts to wrongdoing. Listing all of them does not make the claim of wrongdoing more credible; it only makes the presentation boring as a result of the meaninglessness of its elements. Such shotgun presentation betrays the indiscriminate handling by a pro se of alleged instances of judicial wrongdoing, neither able nor willing to assess the merits of each instance.

1. Connecting excusable mistakes into a pattern of wrongdoing

6. The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations provisions at 18 U.S.C. §1961(5)(jur:111fn249) defines a ‘‘pattern of racketeering activity’’ as consisting of at least two acts each of which constitutes racketeering activity within ten years. This shows that in order to establish a pattern what matters is not the large number of wrongful behaviors, but rather the wrongful nature of at least two of them.

7. However, individual behaviors of an excusable nature can become inexcusable when ‘the totality of circumstances’ surrounding them is assessed in a reasonable, common-sensical way, and all the more so when the assessment relies on statistics

8. Indeed, a wrong behavior may be a clerical mistake, such as an entry in the case docket bearing the wrong date. However, if all or the great majority of such ‘clerical mistakes’ and other similar mistakes by the same clerk or other clerks and people benefit one party and injure the opposing one, though statistically they should be evenly distributed(ol:19§D), then it is reasonable to suspect the totality of them of being intentional. They are not just wrong, but rather wrongful.

It falls to the presenter to articulate all those individually excusable mistakes, two or more of which could conceivably be deemed coincidences, into a set revealing an intentional pattern of wrongdoing.

1. Template as source of categories of wrongdoing, a periodic publication, and persuasion for others to dare expose judges’ wrongdoing

You, Mr. Grundstein, as a lawyer, have the opportunity to fill out the template and thereby make a concise, to the point, and convincing presentation of your case that serves as example for others, particularly the pro ses. For an example of information of judicial wrongdoing so presented but outside the columns of a table, such as that attached hereto, see ol:19fn2 >ws:76§1.

The information that you and other advocates provide by using that template will make it possible to identify categories of wrongdoing and suspicious behaviors that subsequently other parties, especially pro ses, can consider in assessing the behavior of the judge in their respective case. Such categories can be placed on the Y axis of the table, that is, as headings of rows.

The information gathered through filled out templates(jur:122§2) can eventually lead to the composition and publication of the Annual Report on Judicial Unaccountability in America(jur:126§3).

The filled out template that you and other similarly situated parties compose can be used as a professional device to persuade journalists(ol:250) and presidential candidates(ol:296) to investigate and expose judicial wrongdoing in the context of Election 2016, as proposed at ol:271.

1. Interception of advocates’ emails: the need to alert them

Since Friday, July 31, I have not received any emails from advocates of honest judiciaries with whom I have been emailing for months or even years. I have not received emails even when their names appeared in the emails that I had sent them during the previous few days.

Are our emails being intercepted to prevent advocates from joining forces to expose wrongdoing judges and advocate judicial reform? There is probable cause to believe that is the case(* >ol:227§1). Such interception violates our First Amendment right “to assemble peacefully to petition the government for a redress of grievances” as well as our freedom of speech and of the press(jur:130fn268).

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

The motive for the interceptors lies in their interest in covering up wrongdoing by hindering advocates’ joint effort to:

1. audit the rulings and decisions of the same judge that several parties have had in their respective case and which they jointly search for commonalities that reveal patterns of the judge’s wrongdoing(infra and at ol:274);

1. reach out to presidential candidates, who are in desperate need to stand out in an overcrowded field so that one or more of them can strive to become the Champion of the huge(ol:272¶4) untapped voting bloc of all those dissatisfied with the legal and judicial system(ol:271); and

1. contribute evidence to a test case being prepared for appeal to the highest New York State court grounded on a claim of deprivation of victims of judges’ wrongdoing of their right to due process and equal protection of the law by judges who hold themselves unaccountable and not liable to compensate their victims(ol:296).

If you have sent me an email since July 31, please send it again under the above subject line to the bloc of my email addresses provided below, and keep sending it until you receive a reply from me consistent with my emails. Share your and this email with all other advocates of honest judiciaries and as widely as possible to alert advocates and the rest of the public to the interception of our emails.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare trigger history(* >jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, CorderoRic@yahoo.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

.

NOTE 1: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

.

NOTE 2: Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2362oh_dr-cordero-u-s-judiciary-goes-rogue-99-82-complaints-vs-judges-are-dismissed-u-s-justice-sonia-sotom_news

or

Dr. Cordero: U.S. Judiciary goes Rogue – 99.82% complaints vs. Judges are dismissed; U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor hides assets with impunity.

NOTE 3: All my replies are shared with the group that I am trying to form to expose wrongdoing judges and advocate judicial reform, and the national public that I am trying to inform thereof.

If you wish to engage in private communications with me, you must first retain my consulting services; otherwise, your communications are part of your contribution to advancing our common cause of judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform.

NOTE 4: For consulting services, I charge $350 per hour plus expenses and incidentals to be deducted from a retainer of $7,500-$10,000 paid in advance.

The fee for an appearance as an expert witness in a court in New York City is $1,500 per half a day in addition to preparation and any written statement for it, transportation, and any other expenses and incidentals. The fee for appearing in a court outside New York City is determined by the amount of time that it will require plus transportation, hotel, meals, and communication expenses and incidentals.

You can determine the quality of my legal research and writing by examining the articles that I post and my study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts(* >jur:1):

To evaluate my oral advocacy skills, please watch the interview referred to in NOTE 2 above.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

If you are seeking pro bono legal assistance, kindly see my suggestions for finding it(* >ol:131). I cannot afford to work for free for all the people across the U.S. who request my assistance.

I trust that I am helping all victims of wrongdoing judges and advocates of honest judiciaries with my analysis, strategy, and proposals for action in my articles. But attaining our objectives requires that we all join forces to implement those proposals. Will you join in your own as well as the national public interest? If so, please let me know.

*******************************

Re: When pro ses join forces to audit judges in search of patterns of judges’ disregard of the facts and the law and hold them accountable

Auditing Judges

Exposing judges’ wrongdoing

by finding commonalities in their disregard of the facts and the law

that reveal patterns of wrongdoing

that denies due process and equal protection of the law

When pro ses start thinking strategically,

take their hands into action for justice, and

by taking advantage of the presidential election campaign develop into a civic movement that holds judges and all other public servants accountable and liable to their victims

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:274

.

This article may be republished and redistributed, provided it is

in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,

and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

.

By

.

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England

M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School

D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

.

Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, RicCordero@verizon.net, CorderoRic@yahoo.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com

.

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

.

.

1. Anecdotic allegations v. pattern evidence of judges’ wrongdoing

.

1. A party to a lawsuit cannot merely allege in court that the judge is biased or is engaged in other wrongdoing and thereby cause a judge to recuse herself or have her disqualified. The party must provide evidence of his allegations; otherwise, the allegation will be dismissed as impressionistic and anecdotic, and the party will be disparaged by being labeled ‘a disgruntled loser’.

.

2. The most convincing way of making such allegations is by identifying in one’s case an instance of conduct, an event, statement, position, person, name, address, date, number, quantity, etc., that is the same as, or similar to, another in the same case or in several of them, or better yet, in a statistically representative sample of related cases, e.g., those presided over by the same judge or in the same court or jurisdiction: These are commonalities.

.

3. When connected, they form a pattern of wrongdoing(* >ol:154¶3). It is like finding in a judge’s conduct and written or oral statements dots with a common color or shade that when connected reveal a figure: the face of a wrongdoing judge(* >jur:10:Nature of…).

.

.

All (blue text references) herein are keyed to my study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the only national jurisdiction and the models for their state counterparts:

.

Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:

Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(jur:1)

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

or http://1drv.ms/1IkvhB8

or http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf

.

If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, download either of the following browsers, install it, copy the first link above into the browser search box, and hit ‘Enter’. If the file, which is close to 50MB, does not download, try using the other links:

.

Google Chrome:

https://www.google.com/chrome/

or

Mozilla-Firefox:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/firefox/download-and-install.

.

.

4. Pattern evidence is the picture in, “A picture is worth a thousand words” of mere allegations of parties, never mind pro ses. That is what auditing a judge means.

.

5. So a party can either:

.

1. whine about allegations without evidence, which are unconvincing and self-defeating; or

.

1. think and proceed strategically(Lsch:14§3;   ol:52§C;   ol:8§E;   jur:xliv¶C) to expose the judge’s disregard of facts and the law, bias, conflict of interests, etc.; obtain relief now; and for the wrong done to the party by the judge as well as by the judiciary that failed to supervise and discipline her obtain perhaps even compensation from both in future.

.

6. A party that chooses the latter, strategic course of action can:

.

1. gather raw data, e.g., judges’ calendars, rulings, and decisions or even the whole record of cases to glean her statements from transcripts, dockets, party contact information; and

.

1. examine them and compare notes with other parties in search of commonalities that reveal patterns of wrongdoing that deny parties due process and equal protection of the law in violation of the state and the U.S. constitutions, the laws thereunder, court rules, etc.;

.

1. use such pattern evidence in an appeal to the highest state court and thereafter to the U.S. Supreme Court, where it hardly ever reaches because most pro ses do not know how and cannot afford to appeal, so that a case that does make it there can become a test case; and

.

1. additionally produce concrete, verifiable evidence of wrongdoing(jur:5§3) reasonably calculated to attract the attention of journalists(ol:197§1) in search of a scoop(ol:199§H) and so outrage the public(ol:193§D) as to stir it up to force politicians to call for judges to be held accountable and investigated at nationally televised hearings (ol:273¶¶5-7).

.

7. Exposing judges in court with convincing evidence does not mean obtaining relief from the presiding judges. Relief can come through its publicity effect on outsiders(ol:271):

.

8. The all-too many presidential candidates that have entered the 2016 Campaign are in dire need to be among the limited number of them who will be invited to the candidates’ debates, and survive the early primaries. Whether honestly or opportunistically, they can choose to become the champions of the huge(ol:272¶4) untapped voting bloc of people dissatisfied with the legal system, especially those among them most passionately committed to exposing wrongdoing judges: their victims.

.

9. Patterns can be expressed in percentages of all cases of a given type, e.g., how many times a commonality pointing to bias was detected, such as how many times a judge dismissed a case brought by a pro as compared to similar cases brought by a represented party where she denied a motion to dismiss. Patterns can be represented in charts(jur:9); tables(jur:10,11,15,16); and classic graphs of X,Y coordinates(jur:12-14).

.

10. There are many forms of visually representing sets of values, e.g., side by side columns to compare percentages; bell curves for normal distributions; pie charts for shares of a whole, time lines that indicate fluctuations over time as well as trends; intersecting circles for shared characteristics, etc. These are statistical concepts that go from the very simple, which parties may be using without knowing it to represent the ups and downs of their income and their home budget, to the more sophisticated.

.

11. The above describes how the pursuit of an unconventional, strategic course of action in court by go-getters can provide support for, and lead to, an out-of-court strategy(ol:236) for exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform at a politically favorable juncture.

.

.

1. The use of statistics in court was introduced by Then-Attorney Brandeis

.

12. Statistics have been used in courts for a very long time since the first time, one which provides an illustrious precedent: Before Louis Brandeis became a justice of the Supreme Court in 1916, he was an effective litigator advocating progressive causes. He won his cases, not only by arguing the law, but also by writing briefs where he presented socio-economic data and treated it with as much rigor as if it were legal evidence.

.

13. The best known of such briefs of his was filed in Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412, 28 S.Ct. 324 (1908). There Then-Attorney Brandeis used social and economic studies to argue successfully to the Supreme Court that it should uphold statutes limiting workdays for women to a maximum of 10 hours. His briefs were so innovative and persuasive that they gave rise to a new type of brief: the Brandeis brief. They contributed to ushering in a more just society and thus, to making history. In time, Brandeis became a justice.

.

14. Programs such as Excel and PowerPoint turn massive amounts of numeric data into color graphs that Brandeis could not dream of and that substantially enhance their understanding(cf. dcc:11).

.

.

1. Parties joining forces to audit judges so as to advance their common cause

.

15. Each party need not work alone to examine the data concerning the judge in his or her case in search of pattern evidence of wrongdoing. Parties who have appeared before the same judge or have an ongoing case before her can join forces to do so. These similarly situated parties can form a group of strategic thinkers and doers, rather than remain as isolated whiners and losers.

.

16. Parties will not be joining forces to search for pattern evidence so as to form a class that brings an action in court against judges. That is a futile exercise, doomed to fail at the hands of the defendant judges’ peers, colleagues, and friends, who will preside over their trials and any appeals, and protect their own and themselves(ol:158).

.

17. Rather, it is an exercise in gathering evidence in support of the two-pronged approach(supra ¶4c,d; ol:248) to exposing judges’ wrongdoing.

.

18. The parties must join forces to advance a common cause rather than each one work alongside others only to benefit his or her own personal case. They should realize that it is useless for each of them to take on coordinated(jur:88§§a-c) judges in their turf, the courts, where they arbitrarily handle and make rules as they go, and their staff, who must execute their wrongdoing orders lest they be fired without recourse(jur:30§1).

.

19. It is foolhardy to take all of them on with the arms of a pro se: ignorance of the law, TV notions of court procedure, lots of self-defeating, disruptive, blinding emotions, and wishful thinking that is no substitute at all for strategic thinking.

.

1. How a party can go about locating others wronged by the same judge

.

20. A party looks up the list of cases on the calendars of the judge in its case, which are:

.

1. posted on the court’s website or the judge’s webpages on that site; or

.

1. affixed on the wall outside the judge’s courtroom every motion hearing and trial day and of which a picture can be taken with a smartphone or tablet.

.

21. The party extracts from the calendars party names and case docket numbers to find:

1. briefs

.

1) on the court’s website to download them;

.

2) in the court’s research room or law library, where they are in paper form;

.

3) through computer research in the legal databases of:

.

1. a) PACER (Public Access to Courts Electronic Records), https://www.pacer.gov/, accessible through any computer;

.

2. b) Westlaw, http://web2.westlaw.com/signon/default.wl?vr=2.0&fn=_top&__lrguid=i1eb21045275b4acf89cde9be245fb745&rs=WLW15.04&bhcp=1, and

.

1. c) Lexis, http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/legal-solutions/default.page,

.

which are accessible through computers and WIFI at the court and public and law school libraries or a subscription later on bought by a group of parties.

.

4) Those briefs have the contact information of similarly situated parties. Most likely they will be persons, not companies. Ordinary cases brought by persons, even if represented, neither hold as much interest for judges nor command as much of their respect for due process as those filed by the likes of Pacific Coast Docks against NY Association of Importers, represented by big law firms and top lawyers ready to appeal and embarrass sloppy and wrongdoing judges(jur:45¶86).

.

5) Pro ses are trampled. Their cases can be identified by the absence next to their names of an attorney’s name. Person cases and pro ses are easy prey for wrongdoing judges; and

.

1. their phone numbers.

.

1) The phone numbers of parties are not on calendars, but should be on the cover page of their briefs; otherwise, the party names found in the calendars can be used to look up their phone numbers in the phone book or the Internet white pages.

.

22. The party uses a well-rehearsed brief message to contact those similarly situated parties, e.g.:

1. I have a case before Judge Z and found out that you do too. She has disregarded the facts and the law in my case. If you feel that way as to your case, you, I, and others like us can join forces to expose her by detecting common points of her wrongdoing that reveal a pattern of wrongdoing. That is convincing evidence to be used in a test case to go before our highest state court and as an incentive for journalists and politicians to expose her.

.

1. You and I can find other parties using the method I used to find you. When there are five of us, we can meet at a party’s home to search for common points. I can share with you an article explaining this search(ol:274) and templates(ol:280,282) for organizing our work.

.

.

1. Meetings of parties are sessions for division of labor and getting work done

.

23. Meetings are not social occasions where people who do not want to be alone come together to commiserate. They are not for chatting, so wasteful of time and effort. Sobbing together as they pass the box of Kleenex is not the same as professionally gathering the data, detecting their commonalities, and using them to establish patterns of judges’ wrongdoing.

.

24. Meetings are occasions for working. Everybody should come to the meetings with a laptop, a tablet, or a yellow pad and a smartphone. The best meeting place is where there is a large table where people can sit at in business-like fashion. There should also be power strips to plug in all the electronic devices so that nobody need stop working because their device ran out of battery power.

.

25. It should be a quiet place. A pool table in the back of a bar on a Saturday night is not conducive to working. The box of Kleenex is for the group members’ profuse sweating, but not because the place is hot and stuffy.

.

26. The invitation to the meeting must set forth the preliminary work that each party should have done in preparation for the meeting; and the agenda of the meeting; at the end of it, the agenda will provide the measure of what the group accomplished.

.

27. Everybody must bring their documents organized chronologically in a binder or on a pdf, not thrown together in a supermarket plastic bag.

.

28. Documents yield the most information when they have been scanned into a searchable pdf. Then when a group member proposes key terms to search for a possible point of commonality, such as a name of a lawyer or a clerk or a date, all group members can open the pdf’s binocular icon and enter those key terms in the search box to look for that term in all their documents.

.

29. Rummaging a hundred or hundreds of pages manually and visually every time a term must be searched is time-consuming, exhaustive, and unreliable.

.

30. Moreover, pdf’s can be annotated with electronic sticky notes that do not deface the document and can be searched with the search function. Ideas can be committed to writing, not to memory.

.

31. The parties should bring their documents preceded by a table listing each one’s title, sender, addressee(s), date, and page number, and bearing a note on whatever makes that document relevant; cf. the summarizing title of this article(ol:274).

.

32. A well-prepared table of documents serves as a summary of a party’s case. It can be shared with the group by email in advance so that as the members read it, they can spot a possible point of commonality to search.

.

33. See the table of documents template(* >ol:280); see also the table of documents of the main file(* >ToC:i) and its bookmarks.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >280

.

34. Meetings are also opportunities for the parties to realize that they eventually will have to contribute financially to the effort to find commonality points; establish patterns; bring them to the attention of journalists(* >ol:250) and politicians; appeal to the highest state court and the U.S. Supreme Court; publicize their effort through intense mass-emailing and social media use.

.

35. The parties who agree to join forces must proceed methodically. They can elect a meeting leader. The latter can organize group work by applying the fundamental principle of any organization, i.e., division of labor in accordance with each person’s skills and preferences and the organization’s needs and objectives.

.

36. Some members may be more adept at searching for parties’ contact information; if so, they may pass on that information to those members who are more articulate and can communicating with others on the phone or in person.

.

37. Every effort should be made to contact and attract the attorneys of represented parties. Their knowledge of the law is priceless.

.

.

1. Tasks of the group of searchers of judicial wrongdoing pattern evidence

.

38. The initial task of the group is to:

.

1. identify each instance of apparently disregarded or falsely alleged facts, and the law, court rules or any ethical or professional[^fn.123a] provision deemed to have been violated by the judge, clerks, and other insiders[^fn.169]; and apparently relevant characteristics of people, which may later on prove to be correlated, e.g., dismissals and form denials are signed on Fridays when the judge leaves early to play golf at his country club with some lawyers;

.

1. tabulate the data in a table:

.

1) with a top horizontal row of labels for classifying facts and provisions:

.

1. a) facts, e.g., deadline alleged missed, affidavit missing; date manipulated by clerk; ex parte meeting with opposing counsel; unadvertised auction of assets; prevented or cut short examination or cross-examination of witnesses; and

.

36. b) provisions and their citations: v. judge appointing spouse, Rules of the NY Chief Judge, 22 NYCRR Part 36.2(c)(3); and

.

2) in the vertical column on the left are listed the characteristics of people, e.g.:

.

PARTIES

.

1. a) pro se

.

1. b) represented by counsel

.

(1) a solo practitioner

.

(2) law firm with between 2-10, 11-50, 51+ lawyers

.

1. c) parties income range

.

1. d) parties educational level

.

1. e) area of residence

.

1. f) plaintiff or defendant

.

1. g) male or female and age

.

1. h) kind of party: creditor, debtor, driver, pedestrian, banker, professional, etc.

.

JUDGES

.

1. a) size of law firm where the judge worked before coming to the bench

.

1. b) work experience the judge had before coming to the bench:

.

(1) prosecutor

.

(2) lawyer at a government agency or legislative branch

.

(3) lawyer for a company or a public interest entity; etc.

.

1. c) gender, age, and years on the bench

.

1. d) party affiliation of judge or of appointing officer; etc.

.

3) square of intersection between the row of headings and the column of characteristics:

.

1. a) name of case with docket number and date

.

1. b) case decided or pending; etc.

.

Other people

.

1. a) law/court clerks, lawyers, auctioneers, accountants, real estate developers, etc.

.

.

1. From groping for sense in a fog of data to becoming Champions of Justice

.

39. Auditing a judge’s decision is an investigative exercise. At the beginning, the group will not know what is a commonality point or, if so, whether it has any evidentiary value. Patterns are not even suspected until much later, when sense starts to emerge from the points’ relatedness.

.

40. To perceive meaningful commonalities, the group must apply the two key elements of social intelligence to understand the dynamics between parties, judges, clerks, lawyers, etc.: what makes people tic –power, money, love, hate, safety, fear, job insecurity, etc.– and what makes the world turn around –interpersonal relations, clan mentality, tradition, values, ideals, the economy, politics–.

.

41. This will allow identifying harmonious and conflicting interests between parties so as to recognize who is an ally and who is a foe(* >Lsch:14§2; ol:52§C; dcc:8¶11).

.

42. The effort to find commonalities in cases, parties, and judges can reveal a pattern of bias, conflict of interests, dysfunctionality in the court, turf fighting, schemes among connected people, prejudice, etc.

.

43. The tabulation is a data organizing exercise. In its initial stage, the group will not know what is statistically relevant: what happens so frequently or infrequently for that judge, other judges, or people generally that it can only have happened intentionally. So it is a commonality point that forms part of a pattern of some form of wrongdoing(Lsch:17§C).

.

44. This requires that at the outset everything be listed. Later on the data will be sorted out into what is or is not a commonality point showing wrongdoing; see the table of commonalities and patterns template(* >ol:282).

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

.

45. At the end of each meeting, the agenda for what the members should do at home and what they will do at the next meeting should be set. That includes growing the group; getting documents; and networking to be able to present at the right time any incriminating audit results to journalists and presidential candidates(ol:269§2).

.

46. The meeting will have been a success if the consensus is, not ‘that guy is a lot of fun. I wish him well’, but rather, ‘Our group leader is a slavemaster… but we got a lot done. We’re gonna get that judge! I’m coming to the next meeting with my friend’.

.

47. Working together breeds enthusiasm and optimism. It can coalesce ineffective single parties into a team of achievers with valuable skills that they can teach others in their own and the public interest.

.

48. The members will be asked to invest effort, time, and resources to grow the group of parties before their and other judges; and to spot insiders who can be persuaded to become confidential informants(jur:106§c). That is how they can become the organizers of their court’s questers for justice. As such, they will organize other courts in their city, in other state cities, and in other states.

.

49. A group that first met in an apartment garage and had to put their computers on a door resting over two trash cans can grow to become a Tea Party-like entity: a national civic movement of people who pursue strategically and with determination their conviction that We the People are the masters of all public servants, including judicial ones, and are entitled to hold them accountable and liable to their victims.

.

50. We can become the People’s Champions of Justice(ol:235§C).

.

This article and its templates are at

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:274

.

So I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare trigger history(* >jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, CorderoRic@yahoo.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

.

NOTE 1: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

.

NOTE 2: Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2362oh_dr-cordero-u-s-judiciary-goes-rogue-99-82-complaints-vs-judges-are-dismissed-u-s-justice-sonia-sotom_news

or

Dr. Cordero: U.S. Judiciary goes Rogue – 99.82% complaints vs. Judges are dismissed; U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor hides assets with impunity.

NOTE 3: All my replies are shared with the group that I am trying to form to expose wrongdoing judges and advocate judicial reform, and the national public that I am trying to inform thereof.

If you wish to engage in private communications with me, you must first retain my consulting services; otherwise, your communications are part of your contribution to advancing our common cause of judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform.

NOTE 4: For consulting services, I charge $350 per hour plus expenses and incidentals to be deducted from a retainer of $7,500-$10,000 paid in advance.

The fee for an appearance as an expert witness in a court in New York City is $1,500 per half a day in addition to preparation and any written statement for it, transportation, and any other expenses and incidentals. The fee for appearing in a court outside New York City is determined by the amount of time that it will require plus transportation, hotel, meals, and communication expenses and incidentals.

You can determine the quality of my legal research and writing by examining the articles that I post and my study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts(* >jur:1):

To evaluate my oral advocacy skills, please watch the interview referred to in NOTE 2 above.

* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf

If you are seeking pro bono legal assistance, kindly see my suggestions for finding it(* >ol:131). I cannot afford to work for free for all the people across the U.S. who request my assistance.

I trust that I am helping all victims of wrongdoing judges and advocates of honest judiciaries with my analysis, strategy, and proposals for action in my articles. But attaining our objectives requires that we all join forces to implement those proposals. Will you join in your own as well as the national public interest? If so, please let me know.

*******************************

JoAnne Denison, Executive Director Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714 NOW SUSPENDED FOR 3 YEARS FOR BLOGGING ABOUT CORRUPTION AND THE DEATHS OF SENIORS IN ILLINOIS BY THE HANDS OF THE ARDC, THE UNJUST PROBATE COURTS AND THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT.  ALL OF THEM HAVE THE BLOOD OF SENIORS ON THEIR HANDS

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/court_and_probation_company_are_running_extortion_racket_alabama_judge_says/

Depositions indicate that criminal defendants appearing in the Harpersville Municipal Court

“have been subjected to repeated and ongoing violations of almost every safeguard afforded by the United States Constitution, the laws of the State of Alabama, and the Rules of Criminal Procedure,” Harrington wrote in an order (PDF) issued Wednesday.

Harrington temporarily enjoined the city from incarcerating individuals on probation or in post-conviction proceedings unless it first holds a hearing and then obtains his permission. He also said individuals who are convicted must have at least 30 days to pay fines and court costs without being assessed additional fines.

Harrington said the constitutional violations are “so numerous as to defy a detailed chronicling in this short space.”

Defendants are placed on probation with the company, he said, when they are unable to pay the entire amount of assessed fines and court costs on the day of trial. Defendants are jailed, without adjudication, for failure to pay fines or appear in court. Because of the failure to appear or pay, there is a new criminal charge for contempt of court with incarceration and additional fines, again without adjudication. In some cases, fines and fees amounts to “thousands upon thousands of dollars.”

. “When viewed in a light most favorable to defendants, their testimony concerning the city’s court system could reasonably be characterized as the operation of a debtors prison,” he wrote. “The court notes that these generally fell into disfavor by the early 1800s, though the practice appears to have remained commonplace in Harpersville. From a fair reading of the defendants’ testimony one might ascertain that a more apt description of the Harpersville Municipal Court practices is that of a judicially sanctioned extortion racket. Most distressing is that these abuses have been perpetrated by what is supposed to be a court of law. Disgraceful.”

Let’s hear it for the brave judge to buck the system and say the Emperor has no clothes.  For certain, someone tied in is getting kickbacks to get this predatory criminal system into the court system.

It is most interesting the ABA turns off comments.  You will note when my suspension for blogging about corruption resulted in an avalanche of posts coming to my defense, denigrating the behavior of MacCarthy’s flying monkey team, the ABA pulled all of those comments.

They, however, were saved on this blog and you can search for them.

I applaud the ABA for publishing the truth of what the court systems have become in recent decades.  Ken and I will tell you that before there was a great deal of integrity.  But my research shows that the court system, the attorney registration boards have become infiltrated with mob types.

That has to end. We have to reclaim our state and US constitutions.

Lyle Harrison was recently in prison, they refused to treat a broken tooth properly, they drugged prisoners against their will for filing grievances, and they fed the prisoners a diet of 1,000 calories or less–to grown men.  I asked the 4th district to investigate and they returned my Motion to Appeal as denied but not signed by any justice in particular–just the clerk.   (Moultrie County, Illinois)  Both Lyle and his brother lost significant weight.  Andrew, a grown man of taller than average size went down to under 100 lbs in the prison system after 2 months.

And Lisa Madigan, Anita Alvarez and Diane Saltoun “don’t do” court corruption, or any other corruption it seems.

http://texastombraiders.com/get-ready-to-stand-your-ground-granny-shoot-first/

Now I want you to know, I didn’t write this and I don’t advocate violence.  I certainly don’t advocate shooting all the miscreant GAL’s and “professional guardians” out there by grandma and grandpa, but probate blog followers certainly are creative and imaginative.

I have published on this blog (somewhere) the name of a grandpa, who, when targeted, the miscreants (court appointed jerks) showed up at his door step with a court order and police and told he had to leave and go to a locked down nursing home.  What did grandpa do?  Get on his motorcycle and smash into a tree down the block at 60 mph. Worked.  He was dead on the spot.

But what if he stood his ground and argued (correctly) the order was unconstitutional, it violated due process, the 14th amendment for equal protection, the Americans with Disabilities act and draining an estate, isolating a senior and drugging him, and wrongfully imprisoning him in a locked down nursing home entitled him to “stand his ground”.

Others argues that the Geneva Convention on preventing torture of prisoners (false imprisonment, drugging, isolation, etc.) violate that international treaty.  Janet Phelan, a renown international investigative reporter is working on that.

So what are all the laws and what if granny stood her ground? Would she be acquitted?  Apparently victims of domestic abuse are not supposed to be charged with murder when they finally get the upper hand, but they routine are, and only a handful since the domestic abuse and criminal prosecution actions were published have been exonerated–may times they were only acting in self defense.

So the Texans are apparently working on this point.  I guess if you’re going to have guns and violence, it must be Texas and it must be a senior with a gun.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Daughter-of-Casey-Kasem-breaks-her-silence-about-dads-death-320832971.html

If you read the story, by the time the daughter got a court order to see her own dad, from an evil second wife and guardian, dad was too sick.  Typical story of bedsores, neglect, fluid filled lungs–belonged in a hospital weeks ago.

He could not be saved, but the kids could visit.

She now supports visitation laws and enacting them across the country — as does the Catherine Falk Organization so that ailing parents do not have to be isolated from caring loving children.  Let’s pray for them and their work.

JoAnne

http://www.playbuzz.com/gregs/can-you-pass-the-psychopath-test

And you know that I am pushing for a professional test for doctors, lawyers, the ARDC, teachers and nurses–anyone in control of the lives of others.

See my results on my FaceBook page–completely the OPPOSITE of a psychopath/narcissist!

We need more people that are loving, giving, caring, willing to go the extra mile to bring a light into the world and stop darkness whereever it may lurk.

Right now I’m looking at the ARDC, the OPG, Schmeidel and his firm.

I highly doubt anyone of them could pass this test, so the challenge is on.

We are looking for professional psychological testing of the following individuals and if they flunk, they should resign:

Jerome Larkin, ARDC

Sharon Opryszek, ARDC

Melissa Smart, ARDC

Stephen Splitt, ARDC

Leah Guiterrez Black, ARDC

Lisa Madigan, states attorney

Diane Saltoun, Illinois Inspector General

Anita Alvarez, Cook County States attorney

Peter Schmeidel, probate attorney

David Martin, probate attorney

Miriam Solo (cka) Solotevich

Carrie Fung, OPG

Thomas Brennan, OPG

Daniel Stilton, OPG

Richard Harris, OPG

I would like to see their results–and NOT certified by any of doctors Amdur, Rabin, Dinwoodie or any other “probate” psychiatrist.

A psychopath/narcissist is a dangerous person and should RESIGN.  The public should demand it.

JoAnne

http://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/corruption-in-our-courts-what-it-looks-like-and-where-it-is-hidden

“If experience demands a presumption that a judge will seize every opportunity presented to him in the course of his official conduct to line his pockets, no canon of ethics or statute regarding disqualification can save our judicial system.” —Justice William Rehnquist1

A judiciary without honesty has little chance of executing its moral and constitutional duties, no matter how many rules of ethics exist. This is especially true in the United States, where the judiciary is afforded wide discretion. Facts and law require interpretation; justice and equity require judgment. Every decision to grant a motion, to follow precedent, to interpret a statute or facts, to set a sentence or damages—every decision left up to the discretion of a judge—is a potential opportunity for corruption.

Interesting article.  It does discuss the Kids for Cash program in Pennsylvania.