From Eliot Bernstein on the importance of Personal Jurisdiction

Treason Ruling
“We (judges) have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” –Cohens v. Virginia, (1821), 6 Wheat. 264 and U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200.
REMEMBER THIS CASE WHEN YOU CHALLENGE THE JURISDICTION AND THE JUDGE TRIES TO REFUSE YOU YOUR RIGHT TO DO SO

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1821/1821_0

From: kenneth ditkowsky [mailto:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com]

Many of the acts complained of by Jerome Larkin, head of the Ill. Atty and Discipline Comm, Sharon Opryszek, Leah Black Guiterrez and Stephen Splitt, senior litigators there do not consider what they do treasonous (dismissing scores of valid consumer complaints regarding corruption in the courts–situations of fraud, conversion, theft (civil) embezzlement (civil) and other tortious actions) because they will not go after clouted attorneys (Peter Schmeidel, Deborah Jo Soehlig, Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern (Sykes case, et. al) CP, TR (Al Frake case for knowingly drugging him and using chemical restraints on him, selling his home when he wants to go home, etc.) Lyle Harrison (for allowing Judges Flannel and Broach to imprison him for 7 months, his brother Andrew for 2 months and their past brother Pastor Roger for 2 weeks merely for filing counter claims, while pretending it was something else (UPL) and thus violating their civil rights.

These victims and others consider these to be highly treasonous acts (not upholding the US and Illinois constitutions, watching others commit a string of felonies against innocent citizens and doing nothing.  Then actively participating in trials to deny myself and Ken Ditkowsky our Constitutional rights (US and Illinois) to warn the public of this behavior soon as it occurs.

Now we are right.  Mary Sykes was just narcotized to death on May 23, 2015 and dumped in a grave without a funeral but with quick embalmning soon as the money ran out ($5,000)

Someone came to me yesterday and said that he worked in a nursing home to pay his way thru college and everytime the family could not pay, everytime the govt shut off checks, the staff were told by accounting to narcotize the senior!

How many times does this go on each and every day.

We need a federal law that once a senior has no assets, that they be given no narcotics, place in no hospice until reviewed by a hospital committee that the act is not in fact murder.

(This contrasts with Europe where a couple of countries in a T4 Hitler like style have passed involuntary euthanasia bills).

The murder of our seniors and disables is nothing but murder. Those who participate or, worst yet, cover up (Larkin, Opryszek, Smart, Splitt, Sykes case attys, Drabik case attys, Tyler case attys, Al Frake Attys (attempted murder), etc. may also be found guilty of treason and conspiracy 42 USC sec 371)

What they are all thinking, I don’t understand.

Ken and I were right about the Sykes case. Mary is gone, having been murdered soon as the money ran out.  About $150,000 went to attorneys fees.  $200,000 of Gloria’s money was stolen for attorneys fees.  Another $90,000 went to nursing home fees–a place Mary specified in her advance directives she did not want.  This was judges Connors, Stuart and MacCarthy.

Ken and I were right.  Mary would be murdered when the money ran out and her estate would go to attorneys fees and a nursing home.  NOT for anything she wanted in her estate plan.  That was tossed aside by a greedy guardian and her greedy attorneys and the judges that act in concern with them.

MacCarthy went storming down the halls screaming at Gloria she wanted to jail her merely because Gloria brought her service dog to court.  He is trained to bark as a last resort when stress levels indicate lasting damage to Gloria.  MacCarthy has just denied Gloria’s ADA request for accommodation to Gloria and her mother and her Service dog and did so in a nasty and wrongful manner.  Why is this woman still judge?

The blood of Mary is now on the hands of Larkin, Opryszek, (not so) Smart, Splitt, Guiterrez. We warned them.  How could anyone kill or endanger a 95 year old widow?

It is time for Larkin to go to the Illinois Supreme Court, apologize to myself and Ken and drop and withdraw all the charges.

Otherwise, a serious evil and corruption permates our probate hallways.

JoAnne

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “From Eliot Bernstein on the importance of Personal Jurisdiction

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s