Lisa Nadig is a highly acclaimed bel canto (opera) singer.  Her son was ripped from her nearly two years ago when she asked her son to put away his laptop at 3 am because he had school the next day and he attacked her.  She called the police. The police recommend that charges should be filed so that the child may get court ordered therapy.  However, the judge in her divorce case ruled that since he ordered that mother cannot call the police on her son (what judge has jurisdiction to rule that?), she violated his recommendations and therefore custody passed to the ex-husband 100%. She became under a “no contact” protective order because she called the police and showed them bruises on her arms from an attack by her son because he did not want to shut off his laptop on a school night at 3 am they told her to press chargew so son could get free therapy. What  divorce judge does that?  Apparently Cook County Circuit Judge Levinson does.

Lisa N. believes this physical attack was programming from her ex-husband who has told the child repeatedly that mother is crazy, not to listen to her and the son can beat her at any time because no one will listen to a woman in court.  (Ex husband’s background is Iranian, and that should tell you something.)

The ex-husband is clearly a psychopath (someone with anti social behaviors, as reported to the court by court appointed evaluators). He attacked Lisa on a basis repeated and unwarranted during their marriage, both emotionally and physically. Now he is on a terror campaign to keep custody of his son with both the judge (Levinson) and the child rep (Natalie Koga) on his side, knowing that the ex-husband suffers from “anti social” behaviors, which is a nice term for a socio path, or someone that has no good feelings of love, tenderness, caring, empathy, sypathy, etc., but whose feelings only become ehightened when experiencing terror, nastiness, inhumanity, violence, war, anything destructive, etc.  This is what the court appointed evaluator wrote in his report.

Lisa has now lost her child to a known sociopath.  Please pray for her and for her court hearing on Wednesday.

Lisa needs to next file a motion to have an MRI or Pet scan on her ex to clearly show he is either a psychopath or sociopath, but first she needs to regain custody.

Natalie Koga and Judge Levinson support psychopaths.  Both need to be removed as judge and as child representative.  Permanently. Support the testing of both judges and attorneys, GAL’s (guardians ad litems) and child representatives for PET and MRI scannings and pretesting for MMPI’s for psychopathy. DNA testing can also reveal alleles for problems such as lack of remorse and violent tendencies.

We now have the science and technology. Let’s use it to get psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists out of our lives.

Her pleadings to read are here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwWUVUQnF5NFpoRXM

thanks

joanne

PS – here are quotes from Mike Volpe, a renown investigative reporter and author:

Michael Volpe

Dec 11 (4 days ago)

to JoAnne, JoAnne

https://www.facebook.com/Theres-no-place-like-home-1481661518775517/

This page tells a harrowing story of guardianship abuse with a tale of fleecing this woman’s estate by churning the charges, drugging her with chemical restraints, forcing her to live in a small assisted living room when she already has a 4 bedroom home she loved, etc.

Please pray for this mother and daughter.

There are photos of her writing “I do not want to be here.  I am not a criminal.”

This woman begs to go home and says she was “slammed dunked” into this guardianship for her money and property.

The woman calls her daughter every night begging her to figure out a way she can go home again.

The court ordered the Mother to live in a tiny cochroach infested room rather than her own 4 bedroom home.

Mother’s hair did not get washed for 3 weeks under a court order guardianship.

She did not get to see her grandchildren on Halloween because visiting hours were only 1 to 5 pm (many guardianship activists are petitioning for access 24/7 to their loved ones.  It is an act of discrimination under the ADA to force restricted visiting hours.  In the elder’s own home, they could stay up late watching movies with the family.  Nursing homes often don’t do this, and as a result, they discriminate under the ADA or Americans with Disabilities Act.)

JoAnne

But now she needs a place to stay.  She needs psychological help, patience and a whole lot of caring and kindness.  She does not do drugs or alcohol.  She does not smoke.  She does have a very distrustful personality that is very abrasive and wearing.  Her background is Roman Catholic.

If you know of a place for her to stay where she can be helped and the persons involved will have a great deal of patience and understanding, that would be very helpful.

She is looking for a roommate situation where she can have a small area for a desk, computer and lamp. She prefers a neat and clean environment.

Any leads anyone can provide for a safe, clean envirnment for her where she will be around tolerant, understanding people will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

JoAnne

PS–thank you so much to all the people donating bail money on such short notice.  Your donations were greatly appreciated and have allowed her to leave a dangerous environment–26th and California lock up.

PPS–and no, I have faxed 4 entities and no one has contact me with any help for this person, who is likely a victim of sex trafficking.  Not the ARDC, Sheriff Dart, the Women’s Justice Center, the Lithuanian consulate or the FBI.  My investigator has also contacted the help line for women human trafficked, but they have not provided any help for her either. She needs pscyh counseling, career counseling, a clean, safe environment to stay in and a lot of kindess and patience. She is out of jail and I pray safe for now, but she still needs a lot of assistance.  Please pray for her.

Please call or email if you know of some help for her.

Katherine Hine will be co-hosting a broadcast TONIGHT with activist journalist Dr. Bob Fitrakis on his live call-in show, Fight Back, from 7 – 8 p.m. Eastern time. You can listen to the show by going to http://talktainmentradio.com/shows/fightback.html. The call-in number is 877-932-9766. Fight Back is also syndicated on several Ohio terrestrial radio stations including Columbus stations WVKO-1580 AM and WCRS 102.1-98.3. There may be others now carrying this great broadcast.

The topic tonight will be the growing instance of psychiatric detention and indefinite incarceration of citizens identified as undesirables – including whistleblowers, members of religious groups, returning veterans who disagree with the government’s actions overseas, those who blow the whistle on psychiatry itself, even dissident police officers, among others. Also to be discussed is the fact that our courts and legislatures, like those in the former Soviet Union, Communist China, and Nazi Germany are not only refusing to protect citizens’ legal rights, they are collaborating with government psychiatrists to lock up and force drug those who are sane – all at taxpayer expense. Folks are reminded that every Tuesday Katherine broadcasts the psychiatry exposé, Bedlam in America, on http://www.wljaradio.net.

These books are very important because they help us understand the mindset of the psychopath/sociopath.

Good people never understand how the psychopath brain works.  They think everyone is good like them and evil acts are just a “mistake”.

No, they are not.  The psychopath brain thinks and likes evil. They have no feelings for love, affection, empathy, sympathy or remorse.  They are only happiest when then engage in cruelty, torture, bullying, humiliation, war, violence, theft, etc.

So what’s a good person to do? Start reading books on corruption.  Find out how they think, what makes them tick and with knowledge you can feel empowered, fight and overcome.

Retired Arizona Judge Reveals Corruption in Legal System

Someday I will let you all know in a book what has happened to this woman.  I have already written Sheriff Dart, the ARDC, the Women’s Justice Center and the FBI.  The fraud surrounding her case is deep as the Sears Tower.

I don’t have the money, but please paypal or chase quick pay and I will try to get her out tomorrow.

Thanks for your assistance and please cross post.

Anything over the amount needed will be declined or refunded

Joanne@denisonlaw.com

Recently I took a survey on improvements to current guardianship laws and this is my Christmas wish list for federal and state laws:

Every guardianship statute should say it is the public policy of the state: 1) to have family members serve as guardians over non family members; 2) that wards should never be moved to institutions against their will; 3) that disabled persons should always be placed in the least restrictive environment; 4) that no disabled person should be restrained with chemical or other restraints and the use of psychtropic drugs is illegal; 5) waiver of any substantive rights (ie, right to an attorney, right to a trial, right to a jury) shall be recorded by a GAL or attorney for the disabled and made available publicly and may be revoked at any time prior to trial; 6) volunteer guardians and attorneys shall be preferred over for profit guardians and attorneys and the state shall institute programs to recruit and train volunteer or low cost GAL’s and attorneys; 7) a volunteer senior assistant program should be developed to help the disabled pay bills, make good decisions and stay safe shall be preferred over a guardianship; 8) all attorneys, judges and managers of the disabled making any placement decisions or spending the ward’s money shall file Ethics Reports with the Office of the Attorney General annually disclosing all sources of income and any campaign donations; 9) enforcing a patient’s bill of rights in all nursing homes in every state and notifying the disabled of same in large, bold print, 10) lists of all attorneys, GAL’s, case managers, social workers shall be made public with the hourly rate and the senior and family members shall be able to rate their services and costs and publish to the public; 11) ban gag orders and isolation orders, unless the person is a known felon or psychopath– if the disabled person wants to see the ward and the ward wants to see the vistor, this should be their right; 12) make all guardianship records publicly availble and the transcripts for all hearings and hearings must have a court reporter or audio recording; 13) provide funding for those that need to appeal termination of right, POA, etc. incluign money for transcripts and a public defender; 14) all wards have the right to attend any guardianship proceedings if they desire and any family member may bring them and no one–GAL, court appointed attorney, etc. shall interfere with that right; 15) gaslighting and failing to inform the ward of the status of the court proceeding is prohibited; 16) all states must have a tort law that prohibits loss of consortium between parent and child and siblings in a guardianship situation.

Remember, in Chicago, corruption and passing cash and suppressing evidence is all fun and games–until someone dies.

http://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-justice-department-investigate-chicago-police-063652789.html

While the article tells the sordid tale of the city covering up the video of a teen boy being gunned down with 16 bullets (he apparently had a small knife on him), it appears that it is most likely that quite a few scape goats will find themselves on the outs and even in prison.

With complete disgust and utter shame, city attorneys were actually PAID to suppress  the crucial video for 14 months.  The family was paid by the city $5 million to shut up even before suit was filed.

We know that the Mayor was in on this, why he still goes to work and not South America or the Caribbean is anyone’s guess.

We further know a cadre of city attorneys were in on the felonies (obstruction of justice 18 USC sec 4, misprison of felony or failure to report and turn over the video to the feds).  My hunch is likely complaints were filed with the ARDC, and the ARDC did nothing.  Again, this is 18 USC sec 4 violation for misprison of felony.

How long will the public allow city employees to be paid to perform cover up operations as part of their jobs?

The “honest services” provision of 5 USC sec 2635 does not allow for that.  and the Illinois Ethics Act of 2009 does not allow for that.

Illinois and Chicago are repeatedly in the top 5 of all newspaper and University studies as most corrupt in the nation.  Year after year, decade after decade.

And it’s all fun and games, until someone dies.  In this case, a 17 year old teen boy took 16 bullets and was clearly dead or near dead after the first one.  The video was covered up.  Attorneys were paid to do this with tax dollars.  In the Gov. Ryan case, Mr Ryan looked the other way as Commercial Drivers Licenses from the Illinois DMV were traded for $200 or more in cash. That was fun too, until 5 children died in the back of a van because some part broke off a truck, lodged under the mini van and it caught fire because the truck driver bought his CDL from the Illinois DMV.

You don’t see Jerome Larkin and James Grogin announcing on the ARDC website they are committed to disbarring unethical attorneys using public funds to perform cover up operations for politicians, even though it is strictly prohibited by law.

When my First Amendment rights were violated by attempts by the ARDC to suppress this blog, there was no public outcry.  The ARDC’s position is that media, including this blog, cannot report instances of corruption in the court because that would make the judges cry. This blog finds and reports corruption right away.  We publish what we find, good or bad.  Ken Ditkowsky has written thousands of letters and emails of protest to the authorities because seniors are dying by the hundreds each year of forced druggings, their human and civil rights stripped from them by a miscreant court of law.  Where is the outcry?  Mr. Lane Amu first made public his knowledge that Judge Egan was fixing cases and ruling against his clients in favor of opposing counsel who was a close relative of the Judge.  Crain’s Chicago Business later would come to announce that fact to the public officially by mega media after their investigation.  Corporations where the judge sat on the board but litigants appeared before her and she ruled in favor of the corporations booted her off the board and publicly apologized, but Judge Lynn Egan still wear a black robe.

Recently, Dorothy Brown was caught red handed taking envelopes of cash for promotions. She only promoted the “right kind” of city worker–one who brought cash and could be counted on to keep their mouths firmly shut.  It’s not too late for Ms. Brown, she can probably get a package deal with RM, that is unless the feds have already pulled passports.

If those who are outraged by the McDonald coverup want to be sure to get get everyone in the city who is part of the cover up, please do not forget Jerome Larkin and James Grogin over at the ARDC.  They protect attorneys that want to cover up. They suppress the First Amendment rights of attorneys to publish, expose and eradicate the attorney vermin that kill our children in the street with 16 bullets, and hundreds of drugged, fleeced senior citizens.

If the case of Mrs. Ellbogan isn’t enough, if the video I had taken of a perfectly competent, sentient Mary Sykes would have been great, if the miscreants had not ordered the Naperville police to destroy it.

Destruction or Spoilation of evidence is a most serious crime, yet in probate court and at the ARDC it is not a crime.  That crime was reported on this blog, to the ARDC, talked about at the Tribunal as if what I did was wrong, when it was like Adam Stern who had just talked to the Naperville police and the video was ordered destroyed.  Adam Stern has not been investigated for spoliation of evidence, tho numerous attorneys at the ARDC knew of this cover up in the Sykes case.

If we want Chicago to clean up its act, all of these instances of corruption, destruction and spoliation of evidence must be investigated and prosecuted.

The narcotizing of Mary Sykes to death on May 23, 2015 is no less a crime than 16 bullets in a child for simply being near a psychopathic Chicago police officer (if this doesn’t result in mass testing for psychopathy with MRI and pet brain scans, I don’t know what will).

The Feds apparently have a lot of work on their hands if they are to protect the First Amendment, boot out those city attorneys paid to suppress and destroy evidence in a court case, and stop the destruction and spoliation of evidence.

Gloria Sykes wanted that evidence.  It could have stopped a lot of senior deaths in probate.  But this was covered up, likely by Adam Stern, and for certain by the ARDC Tribunal and Review Board in my case.

Why these attorneys aren’t gone, I am not sure

PS– and while the feds are at it investigating the ARDC, a seat of corruption and coverups in Chicago, they can pull the OPG case where 6 people died and see about the complaints and what Patrick Murphy was up to that day and why the stairs were locked.  Go ask him.  I also want to know why initial reports indicated arson, an accelerant and homocide by the CFD, which was later changed weeks later to an accident and a faulty light fixture.  Right.  I also want to know why the Chicago Trib and Suntimes did not do their job by reporting that FILES burned during these fires and this was not just any storeroom but a file store room.  These families deserve closure.  6 dead bodies and families with no closure deserve much more from our public officials.

Here is an excellent article on the dangers of cooking and aluminum and how Al gets into our foods in baking and cooking.

http://www.healthy-holistic-living.com/new-study-alzheimers-aluminum-link-can-no-longer-be-ignored.html

Al is often used as an adjutant in vaccines, which is what many people complain are causing or inflating severe vaccine injuries.

We can’t always avoid Al or aluminum in our foods and cookware, so detoxing by use of curry powder (contains turmeric) and green vegetable juicing is the next best thing.

Certain species of spices and plants in compost piles are able to bind to and remove heavy metals from the soil (Mother Nature knows best).  One of the problems of modern farming is that we do not use natural manures or composts on our crops.  Instead we only spray them with about 6 nutrients, just so they look good and grow fast.  However, this does not mean our foods are getting all the phytonutrients our bodies need each and every day.  That is why many farmers are switching back to small scale, old fashioned farming which was and always is best for society.  That is why many people eat mushrooms or take mushroom extracts.  Mushrooms are experts at removing edible nutrients from the soil and delivering them to the human body.

http://abc7news.com/336963/

the actual study is published here:

http://impactaging.com/papers/v6/n9/full/100690.html

Many people swear that exercise, diet, yoga, keeping fit, reading, playing music, etc. keeps away dementia, or may even reverse it.

Supplement can also easily alleviate:  cancer, dementia, heart disease, depression, anxiety and other mental disorders (your gut is connected right to your brain and both contain the exact same type of tissue).

Vitamins and supplements are linked with reversing and preventing dementia, such B vitamins, C vitamins (Lyphspheric or Lyposomal type) D3 (get tested first), probiotics and MSM sulfur, Iodine, etc.

However, these supplements are pennies each and there is no patent on them.  Many health food stores sell them at reasonable prices (note, the supplements found at big box stores may not be as effective as those, or they may even be slightly toxic, so either research the studies yourself, or as a good medical researcher or Natural Doctor).

In this study, patients admitted to a nursing home were able to return home and some were even able to work again.

I think this is excellent work  the teaching hospitals are conducting and I encourage them to continue these studies.

I personally believe that no person should be admitted to a nursing home without first exploring and testing for basic nutrients.  So often MD’s gloss right over this and go for the harsh chemical drugs of Mega pharma because the doctors often get benefits* from expensive, patented medications. In some countries, medications cannot be patented so that advances in medicine are always available to everyone at reasonable prices.

Nursing homes really should be required to test for vitamin D and C levels prior to admission, and unless there is some reason not to, patients should get regular supplements of vitamins B, C, D3, probiotics and sulfur.  Patients should be offered yoga, meditation and other activities to improve mental and physical functioning.  The food provided should be low carb, with green juicing available and fresh vegetables, both raw and lightly cooked.

But then that would have the propensity to empty the nursing homes after a while, right?

• note, while doctors are not allowed to take direct kickbacks, they will often vacations, business trips, fancy dinners, etc., as long as they are giving or sitting in at lectures on drugs and health.

Recommended amounts to reverse cancer, dementia, heart disease and viral disease and bacteria disease;

Vit C.  take 2 to 3 gr per day for optimal health.  Be sure to take lyposomal vit. C (mercola.com) or LivonLabs.com Lypo Spheric vit c because these are coated with lecithin.  Vit C is easily destroyed in the gut within minutes which means conventional vitamin C is worthless.  LivonLabs.com has the sina quo non of vitamin C which is lypospheric.

Vit C is well known to cure cancer, dementia, heart disease.  Get the book, The Real Story about Vitamin C from Amazon.com. http://www.amazon.com/Vitamin-Remarkable-Controversial-Healing-Factor/dp/159120223X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1453662176&sr=8-1&keywords=the+real+story+about+vitamin+c

Vit B or fish oil  Take 2 to 4 gr per day until you have good blood pressure.  Krill oil is even better because it is made from krill or the tiny shrimp whales live off of.  Many report to me they have plenty of energy naturally, feel great and need less sleep.  If you have the money, go for the krill.

Vit D3, like C and sulfur is essential to every cell in your body.  Get tested (Mercola has a test online for $60) or your doctor can do it under insurance. Insist on it at your next appointment.  Take 5,000 to 10,000 IU’s per day until blood levels reach 80 to 100 ngr/mL which is optimal.

probiotics.  eliminates IBS, diarrhea, constipation, all types of disease and improves brain functioning and libido.  take 20 to 120 billion units per day.  Mercola brand or Flora jen.

Sulfur.  Necessary for healing and joints.  Any brand will do from a reputable mfgr.  Take 2 to 4 gr per day maintenance.  More if you have suffered trauma (bruises, cuts, broken bones, etc.)

Hotflashes or menstrual problems:  Take iodine supplements until better.  Reproductive tissues and the brain need a lot of Iodine/Iodide. http://www.1-thyroid.com/  Dr. Andrew Jones, MD, Austin, Texas

From Candice Schwager comes a proposal for a Class Action against the court system to prevent the abuses that we frequently see in guardianships across the nation.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwLUNtVHlfeWJmYWc/view?usp=sharing

This lawsuit will force the court system 1) to acknowledge the ADA and that it applies to guardianship proceedings; 2) to force evaluations of 7 basic areas of decision making in adults and to state specifically which areas are retained by the prospective ward and which are not; and 3) (most important) to appoint a trained, pro bono, attorney in each case for the benefit of the proposed ward to ensure that the ward is always represented in a proceeding.

the current situation is best exemplified by this article, which exposes only one of many scams in the nursing home arena:

http://www.naturalnews.com/033770_nursing_homes_profits.html

Of course, my only questions are, given the greed, the propensity for fudging with bank account and other assets which often disappear, valuables from the home disappear, seniors are forced into nursing homes against their will, their homes and cars are sold against their will, how will this stop all of that?  And can the courts just recreate the “secret list” of attorneys the judge appoints for them and then business is traded with the attorneys on these secret lists?  When case managers and companies are appointed, it often leads to forced drugging, degradation of the health of the senior because they are often given chemical restraints, harsh drugs they do not need but are expensive rather than checking Vit. D3 levels and vitamin C, B vitamins, etc.–all of which can and will make the senior competent again and fully functional. (See recent study out of LA

I applaud the fact the courts need to declare that guardianship Respondents are fully covered by the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) and their family members  There was no reason for Judge Aicha MacCarthy to exclude Gloria’s service dog via court order and then run after Gloria in the hall and threaten to jail her when the dog barked.  All that was covered under the ADA.

I do think its a great idea that wards should always get an attorney.  And I think it’s a good idea that the attorney is from a volunteer panel to avoid a conflict of interest.  I’m not so sure that most wards would do just fine with a system like they have in Europe where a volunteer or reasonably priced trained adult assists the senior with paying bills each week, hiring an assistant or companion that is low cost or free to ensure that the senior/disabled is taking meds, the home is clean, they see the doctor or the doctor comes there, would be a much better solution than forcing seniors into nursing homes against their will and drugging them.

Oversight is an obvious necessity and where estates are large, allegations of theft, missing funds and other issues should be reviewed with either the FBI or states attorneys on the spot and in an office near the court room so these situations can be promptly remedied.

I also like the “7 factors” analysis of decision making areas, but I fear it will turn into the sweeping generalizations the courts now make where a senior is guardianized with “slight memory loss” and all powers are taken away on the spot.  Perhaps that could prevent the courts from the rubber stamp of totally incapacitated which happens in most cases where the incapacity is relatively slight (Sykes, Payton, etc.)

All I really know is the system is seriously broken and it needs to be fixed.  The attorneys and greed need to be removed from it.  I favor “assistants” to pay bills and help the seniors with their life choices rather than the current system that results in the “target, guardianize, medicate, drain the estate, eliminate and cremate” motto which is going on right here right now that is a clear violation of every disabled’s and senior’s human and civil rights.  Anytime a senior is forced into assisted living or a nursing home and chemically restrained, a home forcibly sold is a clear string of felonies, as far as I am concerned and the FBI should be taking swift action against all the miscreants involved–including and especially all attorneys and judges involved that allowed this to happen.

Seniors have the right to choose if and when they go to a nursing home.  Their “assistants”,  if and when needed should not be attorneys at $250 per hour, and case (mis) managers getting kickbacks from nursing homes at $2,000 to $5,000 per month. That felony and “seniors for cash” has to end.

Seniors should be involved in their guardianships, making their own lists of assets, handling their own accounts and decisions for as long as possible and only low cost or free assistants should be used. Seniors should be involved in the process as long and possible, and never gas lighted by the court or attorneys which only makes the situation worse.

This is not hard, but something has to happen to solve these critical and common violations of human and civil rights and stop the string of felonies from happening in the first place.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-guardianship-woman-death-column-met-20151127-story.html

Excellent article on guardianship goes wrong, proposes that this woman did not need a guardianship and what good did it do her in the end.

The nursing home complained she left the home, she continued her habits of buying more than she could store and hoarding/cluttering there. She often left the nursing home and bought things.

In the end, she was run over by a train because she misjudged crossing when signals were down.

The reality is, the woman was competent. She did not need a guardianship.  What she needed was an assistant to be sure she was safe and to help organize, clean and declutter in her home.

What happened to her was the home was sold to pay gship fees, she was put in AL or assisted living against her will, and probably much of her stuff, upwards of 90% was trashed or given away.

The current system does not serve these people well.  Ms Ellbogan wanted independence and to shop.  No one was really there for her in the end.  No one provided an unintrusive companion to help her and keep her safe.

I believe that Lake County, and the judge and attorneys should refund the estate for the way they mistreated Ms. Ellbogan, the way they sold her home against her will, put her in a nursing home against her will and on a budget that she did not want or need. In the end, she was left destitute regardless.  Read her story and please work with state legislatures to defund the fraudulent for profit nursing homes of any government money, but instead provide inhome assistants for each senior according to his or her needs.  Much more humane.

Certain European cities even have made entire safe neighborhoods for seniors where they can shop, their homes are cleaned and meals are delivered and the seniors are free to do as they please and get outdoors.

Why don’t we have that in the US?  For sure in Chicago we have plenty of ghost warehouse neighborhoods, blighted neighborhoods, etc.

I also support micro homes for the homeless.  Many people are simply too poor to have a real apartment or home today.  The minimum wage has not kept up.   Mega Corp CEOs take outrageous wages of hundreds of millions per year, but pay so little the government has to provide their workers health care and churches have to provide clothes and food, and the govt provides WIC or food stamps to them.

Let’s just admit that a certain portion of the population is basically now in an open workhouse simply due to corporate greed and too high executive salaries.

Other states have passed “benefit corporations” that are allowed to take into consideration in decision making the welfare of the workers, society, the environment, pollution, climate change, etc. without fearing a shareholder’s derivative lawsuit.  Illinois needs “benefit corporations”–a hybird between an NFP and a for profit nursing home.

For profit nursing homes need to be shut until they can get their act under control.  Depriving grandma and grandpa of companionship, good care, good food and good accommodations because a CEO wants to put a few more million notch on his money charts is not the way to go.  It only breed corruption and greed.

Ms. Ellbogan should have stayed in her own home.  A financial “helper” should have stopped by once per week to manage a budget and help her pay bills.  A companion should have helped her stay safe in her own home.

What happened to Ms. Ellgogan was that she was out of control, fought the system, no one managed anything, and in the end, she was not safe and we have only the lawyers, judges and court system to blame.  They wanted the job, then they should do a good job, and that does not include fleecing an estate.

The Walking Dead, a zombie show has an awful lot of corollaries with Chicago and Illinois and it’s plethora of no show jobs.

Take a look at a case in New York from Ken Ditkowsky:

Alfonse D’Amato Tells Jury About Adam Skelos’s No-Show Job Alfonse D’Amato Tells Jury About Adam Skelos’s No-Show… Former U.S. Sen. Alfonse D’Amato testifies about Adam Skelos’s no-show job at the public-corruption trial of New York state Sen. Dean Skelos and his son. View on on.wsj.com Preview by Yahoo How does a ‘low life’ employed by government (or the public) get away with these frauds?    Why does prosecution take so long?    Are the Federal and State Income taxes being collect?   Our democracy is under attack!    There is little distinction between the Jerome Larkin 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators and the ISIS terrorists.    The Larkin group kill hundreds (if not thousands) of senior citizens (elder cleansings) over a finite period of time, while ISIS groups kill a score or two in isolated attacks.    The distinction – we pay Larkin and his band of criminals high five and six figure salaries, while ISIS terrorist pay their own way.   In addition we look the other way when the Larkin group rob their victims.   Of course = the corrupt judicial officials have our sympathy and our ear when they suggest that reporting their criminal activities is AKIN TO YELLING FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATER.     (I did not make that statement up  – Larkin actually said that in documents filed of record in the JoAnne Denison disciplinary proceeding)    Ken Ditkowsky www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

Not until it starts filing ethics reports and complying with the Illinois Ethics Act of 2009, 5 ILCS 420/4a-101 (see prior posts on how Jerome Larkin and the Illinois ARDC does NOT file its ethics reports.

I’ve forwarded the Risk & Compliance blog of the Wall Street Journal.   In particular, the piece on Morgan Stanley is interesting.   Cover-ups and diversions are not limited to the legal profession and judicial corruption.    Somehow however the misery loves company attitude does not give comfort. Corruption will always be here to stay, however, when the person’s delegated to protect us (the public) demonstrate amorality and a total disregard for the core values of our civilization our democracy is under attack.   Corruption in the Court system is a heinous crime.   The cover-up of this crime by agencies such as the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission and the Illinois Supreme Court is intolerable. We have the tools to deal with problem, but the reluctance to use them is incomprehensible.   I envision that part of the meeting on the 13th will be devoted to attempting to induce the “Government” (State and Federal) to perform the public services that “We the People” need for our survival as a Nation.   ISIS assaults that kill a bunch of people are minor compared to the assaults by public officials (including but not limited to lawyer disciplinary commissions engaged in the cover-up of corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers***).   The elder cleansing scenario that has been exposed in the NASGA, Probate Sharks, MaryGSykes **** blogs discloses the unpunished killings of hundreds (if not thousands) of senior citizens being exterminated daily, weekly, monthly. Nasga DISCLOSES four GAO investigations and reports to Congress and the Congressional record reports benign neglect — However – our guardians of the public safety are protecting social security!    The lawyer disciplinary commissions are working diligently to censor lawyers and others who without government attornment disclose the elder cleansing extra circular profit machine operating in the probate courts.    Openly and notoriously these lawyer disciplinary commissions flaunt their mission, abrogate constitutional protections and line their pockets. So confident and arrogant are these organizations that they laud themselves publicly for their criminal conduct.    In the JoAnne Denison case, my Larkin’s stooge wrote that the disclosure of corruption in the MaryGSykes Blog was AKIN TO YELLING FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATER. The authors of the aforesaid infamy are still in the employ of a public agency and still be over paid with public funds.   The ignorance of the basic tenets of the LAW now public by persons paid with public funds is ignored even though the author (and Jerome Larkin) are a real danger to the public.   Here in Illinois pre-teens seeking to enter high school are required to pass a Constitution test – Here in Illinois lawyers paid by the State  6 figure salaries cannot pass the same test. Ken Ditkowsky www.ditkowskylawoffice.com —– Forwarded Message —– From: “kenditkowsky@yahoo.com” <access@interactive.wsj.com> To: jdit@aol.com Cc: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 6:36 AM Subject: WSJ Blogs – Corruption Currents: J.P. Morgan Whistleblower Contests Complaints – Risk & Compliance * Please note, the sender’s email address has not been verified You have received the following link from kenditkowsky@yahoo.com:. WSJ Blogs – Corruption Currents: J.P. Morgan Whistleblower Contests Complaints – Risk & Compliance

And while John Howard Wyman, a victim of Corruption in Rockford Illinois is amazed the State of New York recently opened a corruption Museum and is apparently proud of this achievement, comes the following story from the New York Post:

http://nypost.com/2015/11/30/sheldon-silver-found-guilty-on-all-counts-in-corruption-trial/

On its third day of rocky deliberations, a Manhattan federal jury handed down guilty verdicts on all seven counts against Silver, despite two jurors threatening to throw the trial into turmoil by demanding to be excused.

Silver, a 71-year-old veteran lawmaker who was once one of the most powerful politicians in the state, was found guilty of honest-services fraud, extortion and money-laundering for trading political favors to enrich himself and then lying about it.

He now faces a maximum of 130 years behind bars, although under federal sentencing guidelines, he will likely get no more than 20 years. Silver, who remains free on bail until his sentencing, plans to appeal.

Albany lobbyist Brian Meara testified that he set up a meeting between Silver and an exec at the developer Glenwood Management, which hired another law firm with ties to Silver to handle its property-tax litigation.

Silver got more than $700,000 from the firm of Goldberg & Iryami, with Meara testifying that he was “surprised and concerned” when Silver revealed the fee-splitting arrangement to him. (Mike Madigan, speaker of the House in the Illinois State Legislature has a law firm that does most of the work in Illinois to reduce property taxes, sound familiar?  Where do all those cases and clients come from?  How is he so popular with a stunning track record of reducing property taxes?)

Another question:

Columbia University cancer doctor Robert Taub — who got $500,000 in taxpayer-funded research grants from Silver — testified that he steered dozens of asbestos patients to Silver for legal representation by his law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg.

Silver, who was “of counsel” at the firm, pocketed more than $3 million for delivering those clients, testimony revealed.

Health care, government grants for health care research AND property tax reduction business.  Illinois miscreants should be mighty envious.

That is, until the silver bracelets come out

from a blog fan and thanks so very much:
§ 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.
(a) Public service is a public trust. Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws and ethical principles above private gain. To ensure that every citizen can have complete confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government, each employee shall respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set forth in this section, as well as the implementing standards contained in this part and in supplemental agency regulations.
(b) General principles. The following general principles apply to every employee and may form the basis for the standards contained in this part. Where a situation is not covered by the standards set forth in this part, employees shall apply the principles set forth in this section in determining whether their conduct is proper.
(1) Public service is a public trust, requiring employees to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain.
(2) Employees shall not hold financial interests that conflict with the conscientious performance of duty.
(3) Employees shall not engage in financial transactions using nonpublic Government information or allow the improper use of such information to further any private interest.
(4) An employee shall not, except as permitted by subpart B of this part, solicit or accept any gift or other item of monetary value from any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by the employee’s agency, or whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s duties.
(5) Employees shall put forth honest effort in the performance of their duties.
(6) Employees shall not knowingly make unauthorized commitments or promises of any kind purporting to bind the Government.
(7) Employees shall not use public office for private gain.
(8) Employees shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.
(9) Employees shall protect and conserve Federal property and shall not use it for other than authorized activities.
(10) Employees shall not engage in outside employment or activities, including seeking or negotiating for employment, that conflict with official Government duties and responsibilities.
(11) Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities.
(12) Employees shall satisfy in good faith their obligations as citizens, including all just financial obligations, especially those—such as Federal, State, or local taxes—that are imposed by law.
(13) Employees shall adhere to all laws and regulations that provide equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap.
(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.
(c) Related statutes. In addition to the standards of ethical conduct set forth in this part, there are conflict of interest statutes that prohibit certain conduct. Criminal conflict of interest statutes of general applicability to all employees, 18 U.S.C. 201, 203, 205, 208, and 209, are summarized in the appropriate subparts of this part and must be taken into consideration in determining whether conduct is proper. Citations to other generally applicable statutes relating to employee conduct are set forth in subpart I and employees are further cautioned that there may be additional statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to them generally or as employees of their specific agencies. Because an employee is considered to be on notice of the requirements of any statute, an employee should not rely upon any description or synopsis of a statutory restriction, but should refer to the statute itself and obtain the advice of an agency ethics official as needed.

http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

For years, millions across the globe have indicated that there was massive coverups by nations around the world to feather the beds of mega pharma, with mega pharma refusing to turn over their actual data on vaccine effectiveness and the governments refusing valid FOIA (Freedom of Information Acts) requests.

From the article:

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.

Even as this is published, states in the US continue to make many dangerous vaccines containing known toxins (aluminum, mercury, etc.) mandatory in certain professions (healthcare workers and day care) even though they don’t know the actual risks to patients and children.

The fact that courts are now ordering the turn over of records under FOIA and typical discovery is a win for every citizen in the world.  If a child has a compromised immune system, no vaccines should be given until the immune system is boosted.  And, in cases where vaccines contain dangerous substances, at least the parents are warned and can take precautions such as breast feeding for years, boosting the body with supplements (vitamins B, C, D3 and probiotics and sulfur) and can put the child on detox programs.

This mainstream article is a huge win for governments that provide government quashing of information and huge payments to injured children and patients, which in effect is nothing more than corporate welfare.

Welfare for the individual in the US has ended due to citizen demands.  Now welfare for mega corporations must end also.

ABC California in depth series. Maricopa county, California

Brad Lund is in the middle of a probate court battle.  Brad is the grandson of walt disney.  Several atty. Were hired.  One atty, Joel Sanis refused to answer questions claiming attorney client privilege and found himself locked up.

The sheriff’s deputy handcuffed them and took to a holding cell.  He said this had never happened to him before.

brad has spent about $1 million in attorneys fees.

Attorney Laura Kanapanek has stated the following: “[probate] Court is a rubber stamp.  No one is held accountable. There is rampant financial exploitation and abuse of vulnerable adults. .  Accounts are drained and then the state has to take care of the individuals. Probate court not doing its job.”

ABC reports changes in law are coming to probate court with new legislation in the works.

+Courts will be required to follow the family’s wishes. (That often does not happen.)

+Not charge excessive fees.

+Budget for future expenses.

+Provide an estimate of expenses to the estate up front.

One professional Guardian spent $1 million of the ward’s money in 3 years leaving her destitute, one spent thousands on stuff animals, etc.

Joel Sanis says it is “A system that is deeply flawed.”  Regarding his incarceration, he says, “I was put into a holding cell.  I had to give my belt shoelaces, tie, etc. and it was embarrassing.”  He had never been treated like that before.

Brad has been finally ruled not incapacitated.

This Response was directed to Judge St Eve, who is apparently the new judge in charge of the Executive Committee.

Fax cover sheet:
FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
To:
Judge St. Eve and
The Executive Committee
ND Illinois
c/o Ms. Panter
Fax No: 312-554-8512
From:  Admitted Ill (suspended), NC (inactive)  and Patent Bars
JoAnne M. Denison,     Pat. Atty.  Reg.  No.  34,150
Justice 4 Every 1, NFP    FAX 312-553-1307
5940 W Touhy Ave, #120    CELL PH 773-255-7608
NILES, IL 60714    PHONE 312-553-1300
JoAnne@justice4every1.com or http://www.Justice4Every1.com
Federal Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights
Now–suspended by the ARDC for blogging about corruption in the courts for three years.  Join the Lawyer Activist Innocence Project.

For transmission problems, please call 312-553-1300
A confirmation copy       WILL   ✔   will NOT be sent.
Pages in fax, including this coversheet – (  )
November 20, 2015

Re:    Unconstitutional Suspension of Joanne Denison
Case No. 2013 PR 1 – ARDC

Dear Ms. Panter;

Attached is a further response to the Recent Order of the Northern District Court in light of new case law (Waddington, Rosemond and a Harvard Law Review Article).

I really don’t understand how difficult the First Amendment is for attorneys to understand.  It’s really quite simple, has no real limitations–especially when it comes to political speech, and it seems as though it was designed exactly to fit my exact situation, i.e., corruption in the courts, and the stripping of seniors of their human and civil rights, all their assets which are commonly handed over only to attorneys that rarely, if ever see them and who aren’t really protecting them, and then they are subject to forced drugging (at a rate of 20 to 80% in nursing homes where they do not want to be), finally after the estate is drained mostly by attorneys fees, the senior is narcotized to death (Sykes, Gore, Drabik, Baker, etc.) and then often cremated to destroy evidence (Rector) or the body hidden (Tyler) or the probate court patently refuses exhumation and tox screens (Sykes). I believe that the ARDC/Executive Committee have no jurisdiction over media/blogs under the First Amendment to regulate my blogs, and in such a corrupt, retaliatory manner.  Lawyers Kenneth Karl Ditkowsky, Lanre Amu and I are Activist Attorneys working under the umbrella of a Not for Profit to benefit the citizens of Illinois and throughout the nation. Our work is blessed and must not be interfered with.

We need to stop all of this and I and Kenneth Ditkowsky are working assiduously on all of this.  Other attorneys are helping us too, who wish to remain anonymous due to risk to their licenses, nas well as scores of citizen probate victims, but we also need the assistance of the court system.

I trust you understand.  Please deliver the attached to Judge St. Eve and the Executive Committe and I pray they change their decision in my case and the cases of Lawyers Lanre Amu and Kenneth K Ditkowsky.

Your prompt assistance is greatly appreciated.

Very Truly Yours,

DENISON & ASSOCS, PC

JoAnne Denison

JoAnne M. Denison

cc: http://www.marygsykes.com, http://www.justice4every1.com

US DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
In re: Joanne Marie Denison

Attorney-Respondent

No. 6192441

by the Illinois ARDC,

Petitioner
MR 27193

Response to Petition for Interrim
Suspension under Rule 774

Case No. 2013 PR 1

NOTICE OF FILING
RESPONSE TO CITATION TO SHOW CAUSE

To:
Atty Sharon Opryszek
Counsel for Administrator
One Prudential Plaza
130 E Randolph Dr, Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60601

Please take notice that on November 19, 2015 the undersigned Ms. Denison hereiwth filed her Response to the Citation to Show Cause.

By: _____/esign/joannemdenison/____
Pro se

Prepared by
JoAnne M Denison
Justice 4 Every 1, NFP
5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120
Niles, IL 60714
312-553-1300
joanne@denisonlaw.com

US DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
In re: Joanne Marie Denison

Attorney-Respondent

No. 6192441

by the Illinois ARDC,

Petitioner
MR 27193

Response to Petition for Interrim
Suspension under Rule 774

Case No. 2013 PR 1

UPDATED RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF FILING
RESPONSE TO CITATION TO SHOW CAUSE

The following is an updated response to the Rule to Show Cause to Remove the above Respondent from the roles of attorneys for the ND of Illinois.
The ARDC review board found two violations of the Illinois Rules of Ethics as follows:
The Hearing Board found that the Administrator proved Respondent’s statements outlined in the Complaint were false and that Respondent made the statements knowing they were false or with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity. The Hearing Board concluded that Respondent violated Rules 8.2(a), 8.4(c) and 8.4(d). The Hearing Board recommended that Respondent be suspended for three years and until further order of the Court.
Upon review, Respondent challenged the findings of the Hearing Board and argued that the First Amendment protected her statements. The Review Board concluded that the Hearing Board’s findings were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The Review Board concluded that the First Amendment did not afford any protection for Respondent. The Review Board affirmed the findings of misconduct of the Hearing Board and recommended that Respondent be suspended for three years and until further order of the Court.  Decision, p. 1.

It is still patently untrue that “the First Amendment does not afford any protection for Respondent.”  The ARDC continually miscites the Sawyer case wherein SCOTUS made it clear that a lawyer can criticize a court, a statute or a decision.  Emphasis added.  In Re Sawyer, 360 US 622 (1959).  The ARDC, Tribunal and Review Board consistently mis-cited cases to suit its own purposes.  Since 1959, the First Amendment clearly protects the political speech of attorneys, and it does so in an unfettered manner.  The ARDC rejects this notion, but it does so on unethical, immoral and intellectually dishonest bases.
Respondent continues to request that she and Lawyer Kenneth Ditkowsky receive Whistle blower protection from the ND Illinois Court system for their work in protecting innocent victims of court corruption, particular in the Illinois Probate Courts where no other lawyers are willing to help victims.
The mantra in the probate courts is still “target, quickly guardianize, isolate, medicate, drain the estate, eliminate and cremate.”
The ND of Illinois must take steps to eliminate the corruption in the Illinois court system and restore Truth and Justice and the Rule of Law.
As an update to my Prior Response, since the decisions of the ARDC and your issue of an Order to Remove, important case decisions have issued (Rosemond v. Markham, ED Ken., 9/30/15) and In re Weddington (Ill. App. 4th Dist. 2015) as well as a Harvard Law Review Article making it clear that the judicial system has no jurisdiction whatsoever to regulate the media.  These cases are based upon a long line of SCOTUS decisions cited in my prior briefs to the ARDC and Tribunal and Review Board which make it clear the ARDC does not have jurisdiction over my blog.
47 USC § 230 (Internet Decency Act) and 320 ILCS § 20/4 (Elder Abuse reporting immunity) make it clear that bloggers have immunity from prosecution for what is published on blogs.
In your Respondent’s case, numerous posts were made on the blog http://www.marygsykes.com and a mirror blog http://www.justice4ever1.com that reported on the activities of certain nefarious judges and attorneys acting in conjunction therewith to deprive seniors of their basic human and civil rights.  Most notably was disabled person Mary G. Sykes in case no. 09 P 4585, the subject matter of most of the ARDC dispute wherein the ARDC attempted to cover up a string of highly unethical and immoral actions by the following attorneys and judges: Judge Jane Louis Stuart (suddenly retired), Attorney Cynthia Farenga, who asked the ARDC not investigate her unethical actions but those of Kenneth K. Ditkowsky, a known human and civil rights activist in the guardianship field of law, as well as those of myself, a blogger and activist in the area of human and civil rights for seniors and disabled adults in the guardianship field of law.  Attorney Farenga wrote to the ARDC and asked them to cover up the following unethical actions:
1) Mary G Sykes was guardianized with GAL-attorneys Cynthia Farenga and Adam Stern and Atty Harvey Waller motioning for her guardianship fully well knowing that Mary had not be served with advance notice of the time, date and place of hearing 14 days in advance of finding her disabled, certain family members–Yolanda Bakken, a sister; Kathie Baken, a niece and Gloria Sykes, the younger daughter all objected to the guardianship and that Mary had no counsel and she also objected to the guardianship and wanted her own attorney;
2) Mary G Sykes requested and never received any independent counsel prior to the hearing;
3) Cynthia Farenga has a husband, Michael J. Crowley who has a sting of property records with numerous transactions for buying and selling homes (likely from probate) which were never investigated;
4) Cynthia Farenga has a $600,000 mortgage recently on her home which was never investigated (bribes are often passed by one person taking out a loan and another one paying it back).
5) Nursing homes frequently pay kick backs to the persons placing them there of $2,000 to $5,000 per month. This has never been investigated, and Mary Sykes was placed in at least two nursing homes–against wishes stated in her advance directives, a POA of that she remain in her home with both daughters to care for her there.  That has never been investigated.
6) The most heinous crimes were: a) Mary G Sykes was narcotized to death “in hospice” on May 23, 2015 when the money ran out, and she was found drugged and in a stupor, when she was not only a staunch Roman Catholic that did not believe in drugs or hospice, but she was also did not believe in drugs as a  dedicated vegetarian on an organic diet; b) her home was located in Norwood Park, a highly desirable area of Chicago, it was appraised in February of 2012 for $750,000 and then sold in probate two months later for $213,000; and c) approximately $200,000 or 90%+ of her estate went to attorneys fees for attorneys Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel and Soehlig.  None of this has been investigated after numerous requests to the ARDC and direct pleas to Jerome Larkin, head Administrator of the ARDC. All of this has been reported on the blog and the Tribunal found it to be “lies” when in fact it was and still is the Truth.  The Truth has not disappeared and the Sykes-Bakken family has been terrorized by these attorneys in probate and they have received no true Justice for Mary Sykes.
Instead during kangaroo court proceedings, Lawyer Kenneth Ditkowsky (a veteran lawyer of 50+ years) and myself were found to be “guilty” of making false statements on my blog resulting in a 3 year suspension when all I did was publish letters to the authorities either requesting or demanding appropriate investigations, relaying information to the public about the facts which were told to both myself and Kenneth by more than a dozen concerned citizens that Mary G Sykes was the victim of fraud and corruption in the court system.
The public has a right to know.  Respondent and others have a right to republish these letters and communications and the comments from family members that are concerned about fraud and corruption in the court system.
The blog is open, free and democratic.  Attorneys Farenga, Stern, Schmeidel and Soehlig had more than ample opportunity to deny allegations of corruption which they refused to do.  In addition, Respondent and Kenneth Ditkowsky have appeared on dozens of cable show programs, and the moderator always invited these attorneys to appear, but they never agreed to accept the invitation, even after dozens of requests.  (Cooper’s Corners, Comcast broadcast weekly, moderator Bev Cooper, herself a probate victim where her own mother, Alice Gore was isolated for 10+ months and then when she was granted one hour visitation, she found 29 gold teeth of her mother had been removed, not inventoried, and then poor 99 year old Alice Gore was narcotized to death when the money ran out).
The ARDC routinely, under the tutelage of Jerome Larkin and his in house counsel James Grogin, dismisses valid citizen complaints about seniors being guardianized without the statutory protections, placed in locked down nursing homes against their will, and then chemically restrained. The isolation and drugging of senior citizens is considered to be a violation of the Geneva Convention by many.  Convicted serial murders have more human and civil rights than a senior citizen in a guardianship in Illinois, currently.  Nursing home reports from 20 to 80% of residents of nursing homes are given some type of chemical restraint, all of which is illegal and such drugs are medially contraindicated with black box warnings by the FDA for those under 20 and over 60 years of age.
Recent Relevant Case Law: Weddington, Rosemond and Harvard Law Review

Since the last submission of information to the ND Illinois court which Respondent provided after receiving a Rule to Show Cause, the number of horrific cases in guardianship has only grown.  She gets on average 2 or 3 new cases per week, and she is dedicated to writing up blog posts and timelines for the probate victims and their families. Her goal is to write a series of books on elder abuse in guardianships until the public is well educated on the subject.  Hundreds, if not thousands of seniors are at risk across the nation of their estates being drained and then narcotized to death in “hospice” and other starvation/dehydration programs set in motion by nefarious guardians (of death and abuse) and their attorneys and tied in GAL’s.  The streaming of cases in her email inbox never ends.
However, the cases of Weddington, Rosemont and a particularly on point article by the Harvard Law Review (Exhibit A, hereto) makes it clear that the ARDC has no jurisdiction to review, monitor and discipline (in an effort to cover up) the publication of a string of felonies occurring in our guardianship court rooms day in and day out.  This is a valid media activity and is well protected by the First Amendment on a historical basis from the New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) case up to and including US v. Alvarez case where Mr. Alvarez publicly proclaimed he was granted a Medal of Valor when in fact this was an utterly false claim.
As explained in In re Sawyer, 360 US 622 (1959), a case involving a lawyer in Hawaii, the US Supreme court made it the law that a lawyer can criticize a case, a statute or a court decision.  Mr. Rosemond asked for protection under the First Amendment for his highly popular column on psychological advice and was granted it.  Likewise, Ms. Denison is asking not only for First Amendment protection for her blog, but also protection as a Whistle blower who protects the civil and human rights of senior citizens and the disabled.
Mr. Rosemond’s column is not a commercial endeavor and therefore deserving of First Amendment protection.  Rosemond at p.12. Likewise, even the ARDC has admitted that Ms. Denison’s blogs are not commercial but composed of political speech, she does not sell any information on them and makes no money from them.  They are simply a safe forum for probate court victims to discuss their cases and strategy.  Political speech should be entitled to 100% First Amendment protection–whether true, false or in between, the blog is the same as a newspaper and the government is not allowed under the First Amendment to regulate news media–period.
The ARDC refused to all Ms. Denison to present testimony from other popular probate blogs and bloggers, including Sylvia Rudek from NASGA or trhe National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse, and Ken and Beverly Cooper from Cooper’s Corner Cable TV show and Probatesharks.com–two of the most popular probate blogs, were not allowed to testify that 1) Ms. Denison’s blog is truthful; 2) her blog is of genuine value and support to probate victims; and 3) the miscreant Judge and attorneys allowed to testify on behalf of the ARDC are not trusted in the legal community and have profound negative feedback from probate court victims.  All of this testimony was disallowed by the Tribunal because they said “they did not need it.”
It is interesting to note that Atty Schmeidel testified that he is well liked by the probate judges and other probate lawyers, but he never said that probate victims liked him as well.
The Rosemond court found that the regulatory board’s regulations for a psychological advice column were unconstitutionally applied, Rosemond at p. 21.
In a recent Harvard Law Review Article, (Vol. 128:183) p. 183 entitled “Occupational Speech and the First Amendment”, the Author, Mr. Paul Sherman  a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, carefully studied a long line of US Supreme Court cases on occupational speech and the First Amendment, including the cases of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n (sale of unlabeled violent video games to minors) , and US v. Alvarez (false public claims to a Medal of Valor), Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (teaching terror groups how to resolve disputes via humanitarian and diplomatic methods), US v. Stevens (videos of animal abuse used for erotic purposes), In re Weddington (court could not control or manage Face book posts by one litigant in a hotly contested divorce) and came to the conclusion that occupational speech can and should be protected by the First Amendment.  Also pertinent to the issue of the government regulating occupation speech are the cases of: Lowe v. SEC- (SEC had no jurisdiction to regulate an investment column run by a former licensee after numerous financial felony convictions), and IRS v. Loving (IRS had no jurisdiction to require tax preparers to become licensed by the IRS because Congress had not granted the IRS such authority).  These are additional SCOTUS authority for protecting occupational-political speech completely under the First Amendment.
In its summary, Mr. Paul Sherman makes the following conclusion with respect to occupational speech and the First Amendment:
CONCLUSION
As I have tried to explain above, granting full First Amendment protection to occupational speech is the only position that is consistent with binding Supreme Court precedent. It is also the only position that is consistent, more broadly, with the general trend of the Supreme Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence over the last 20 years, which has removed political speech from a position of privilege and now recognizes that speech on a wide variety of topics is entitled to robust  constitutional protection. Whether that was,… [as some may] argue, a “radical[] ” shift when it began in the 1990s,124 it is now merely the long-established law.  Harvard Law Review article on “Occupational Speech” at  201.

The author goes on to note that the First Amendment has uncompromising text–it does not distinguish between violent video games, or lies about receiving military honors, or lies in the press or speech about any subject, popular or unpopular.

The ARDC, in its decision, believes that it has the right to control the media, to control attorney speech outside representation of actual clients.  The blogs http://www.marygsykes.com and http://www.justice4every1.com do not speak of anything which has not already been mentioned on the internet or confirmed by family members.  The ARDC Tribunal simply told the family member witnesses (who were already probate victims and one suffered greatly from Court induced PTSD or LAS–Legal Abuse Syndrome, that the family was wrong, the attorneys and judges were right and they suppressed testimony and evidence on theft of $1 million from the estate of Mary G Sykes–a woman who would soon be murdered or narcotized to death on May 23, 2015.

It repudiates the paternalism that rests at the heart of so much regulation of speech, instead viewing Americans as capable of seeking out information on a wide variety of topics and of reaching their own conclusions about the merits of that information. This view is perhaps most eloquently stated in Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. FEC.  When Government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control
thought. This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves.  Harvard Law Review at 201

It is respectfully submitted that it is wrong for the ND Illinois court to willy nilly follow the lead of the ARDC and suspend either Ms. Denison or Mr. Kenneth Ditkowsky for their activism in representing probate victims and writing for and publishing a blog (Mr. Ditkowsky primarily writes letters to probate victims and the authorities concerning the frequent strings of felonies committed by guardianship abusers in the court room; Ms. Denison publishes these on her blog.
Conclusion:
For all of the reasons cited above, Respondent is entitled to:
1)  First Amendment protection for her blog under the case of In re Sawyer,
2)  she is requesting that the ARDC be directed not to interfere with her blogs or use her license as a weapon to curtail free speech political activity on her blog; 3)  Respondent is further requesting that the ND Illinois declare her to be a Protected Whistle blower under the policy of the State of Illinois, the Illinois Constitution regarding free speech, the policy to allow the free reporting of Elder Abuse under 320 ILCS § 20/4 to the authorities and publish copies of said communications on her blog, and that her blog is further protected under 47 USC § 230 or the Internet Decency Act.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

By: _____/esign/joannemdenison/____
Pro se

Prepared by
JoAnne M Denison
Justice 4 Every 1, NFP
5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120
Niles, IL 60714
312-553-1300 ph
joanne@denisonlaw.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a copy of the foregoing Response to Rule to Show Cause served by placing same in the US mail, first class postage, prepaid, upon counsel for the IARDC at the address below: this Nov. 19, 2015 at least as early as midnight in Niles, Illinois

and a copy was delivered to the Executive Committee Chair at

219 S. Dearborn St,
Chicago, Illinois 60603

Ms. Sharon Opryszek
Counsel, ARDC
130 E Randolph St
One Prudential Plaza, 15th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
312 565 2600 served by USPS mail

______/esign/joannemdenison/

____________________________

cc: http://www.MaryGSykes.com
http://www.Justice4every1.com
Chicago FBI

http://www.tmz.com/2013/10/16/mickey-rooney-settlement-lawsuit-elder-abuse-insurance/

The family admits to the siphoning off of cash from his accounts and physical and mental abuse.

Only one catch, the miscreants don’t have $2.8 million, but say they are insured for that.

The insurance company says the policy does not cover intentional torts such as elder abuse and exploitation.

Now the fight is over whether the insurance company must pay out.

interesting.