“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,”
Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).
Author Archives: Joanne M Denison
Quote From Patrick Henry on the US Constitution
The Constitution is not a document for the government to restrain the people: it is an instrument for the the people to restrain the government.
Fake lawyer helped clients for 10 years, made partner at firm, led county bar association
Fake lawyer helped clients for 10 years, made partner at firm, led county bar association
Now you and I know the only way this can happen is if this lady had some very excellent professional help in some high places to cover up her strings of felonies as a fake attorney.
Dean Loren, a wrongfully disciplined lawyer who runs a close cable TV program and blogs about corruption in NY, has alerted me to the fact that the NY atty general was issuing fake law licenses to clouted individuals to go to court against honest litigants and do dirty work when they could not find attorneys that were willing to engage in unethical conduct, lies and smear campaigns.
http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/03/fake_lawyer_helped_clients_for.html
Fake lawyer helped clients for 10 years, made partner at firm, led county bar association

Ken Ditkowsky and Joanne Denison on Cooper’s Corners tonight!
From 7:30 to 8:30, local access cable show serving the North Shore community of Chicago.
I believe it is the nation’s longest running weekly cable access show for community interests.
Bev Cooper is a wonderful, kind and caring host that wants to spread Truth and Justice in “crook” county, if that is at all possible.
If you do not have cable access and live in the North Shore, the program will be on Youtube some days later.
You may be interested in the past shows that Ken and I have done. I know they’re still being watched because my blog fans still call, email and discuss these shows they just saw recently and they are amazed that there are some human being attorneys out there that care and do great work for truth and justice.
2-15-11 Ken Ditkowsky and Operation Greylord
2-17-15 Ken Ditkowsky on Greylord and Elder Cleansing
1-7-15 Ken Ditkowsky and Elder Cleansing of decorated Veteran
3-10-14 Wrongful Discipline of atty Ken Ditkowsky for speaking out against corruption in Illinois Probate courts
6/19/13 Ken Ditkowsky and JoAnne Denison Wrongfully Disciplined for speaking out against Corruption in the Courts and Elder Abuse and Financial Exploitation
12/17/14 Joanne Denison on the wrongful Discipline of 3 attorneys – Lanre Amu, Ken Ditkowsky and herself for speaking out against court corruption in “crook” county Illinois
6-11-14 Joanne Denison wrongfully Disciplined Lawyer is now Illinois’ Most Dangerous Blogger for asserting her First Amedment rights in a Corrupt Court System that abuses the Elderly
1/15/14 Joanne Denison — Illinois Most Dangerous Bloggers reveals truth in Illinois probate court system
2/6/13 Joanne Denison speaks the truth about elder abuses in probate — Wyman, Sykes, Tyler, Gore
12/10/14 Joanne Denison Blogs and Speaks out against Corruption in the Illinois Court System
2/25/15 Joanne Denison speaks out against corrupt Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission for violating her First Amendment Rights and those of lawyers Ken Ditkowsky and Lanre Amu who speak out against corruption in the courts and write to the authorities about string of felonies in probate
If you can’t watch the show tonight, have yourself a private corruption marathon where we as the essential questions: 1) why does the Illinois ARDC cover up dissent and corruption with a sledge hammer pounding attorneys that dare to speak out; 2) where is the FBI and the Illinois state’s attorneys Lisa Murray Madigan, Diane Saltoun and Anita Alvarez in all of this. The beds are burning! (Nursing home beds that are, with elders forced into a nursing home by the corrupt probate courts, all assets liquidated and provided to attorneys, court tied in vendors (psychiatrists, visiting nurses, case managers, etc.) and then the elder is narcotized to death when the money runs out!
From Ken Ditkowsky–now the cover up is obvious with the non discipline for Atty Seth Gillman
Every time an attorney is indicted with a good record, you know that there were consumer complaints and other lawyer complaints about him or her. The question is, why is the ARDC hiding it.
We all know that Jerome Larkin has massive payoffs of hundreds of thousands of dollars on his property records, why won’t he make those public. Who is paying off all those loans.
Read on. Ken asks a whole lot more pertinent questions.
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To: Gene <eawrona@ptd.net>, JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com>
Cc: Katherine Hine <katherinehine@wljaradio.net>………………..
Subject: Re: Justice Served with Andy Ostrowski – disciplined lawyer series – lawyers for judicial reform
Date: Mar 23, 2016 3:51 PM
| JoAnne –
What is amazing to me is the fact that the ABA, IARDC, Supreme Court of Illinois, the media, and our friends have not raised a hue and cry over the fact that you were suspended from the practice of law for disclosing criminal activities of judges in your blog. The exact words equating the said disclosures as being akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater! Interestingly enough Seth Gilman pleaded guilty to stealing a large sum of money from medicare, etc. The government pegged the theft at about a billion dollars. Employees who paid into their pension funds also suffered breaches of fiduciary relationship. Today the IARDC site discloses: LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of March 23, 2016 at 1:19:50 PM:
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. The disciplinary results displayed above include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625. ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. For changes to contact information, including address, telephone or employer information, we require that the attorney submit a change of address form. Please consult our Address Change Requests page for details. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult ourName Change Requests page for details. THUS IT IS CLEAR – IF YOU DISCLOSE CORRUPTION you are an ethically challenged lawyer; however, if you participate your meet the Illinois criteria for practicing law! Where are our friends! Why have the civil libertarians amongst us been so silent! The silence is deafening! I would like to know how such conduct as referred to supra is reconcilable with American Democracy! Ken Ditkowsky |
Kickbacks, bribes and Cal. medical fraud scandal
Kickbacks, Bribes, and the Horrifying Truth Behind California’s Largest Medical Fraud Scandal
Long Beach hospital owner Michael Drobot spent decades bilking the state of millions for unnecessary surgeries with allegedly bogus hardware, and plenty of doctors went along with him
March 21, 2016 Steven Mikulan Business, Crime 1 Comment
Ron Calderon sat alone in the New Deal-era federal courthouse at Spring and Temple streets in downtown Los Angeles. Moments before, this scion of a California political dynasty had strolled through the room’s big Wizard of Oz double doors, his suit jacket open to expose a generous girth, as though he were casually stepping onto the floor of the state senate, where he had once been a power broker. Nobody paid attention to him, and he had a whole row to himself. On this morning last April Calderon had nothing to do but fuss with his glasses and await the appearance of a judge. At the podium Mark Geragos, the theatrically affable celebrity lawyer, was playfully straightening the tie knot of an unsmiling Doug Miller, an aggressive assistant U.S. attorney who sported a shaved head.
They were all gathered for one of a string of hearings that might eventually lead to Calderon’s trial on bribery and conspiracy charges. A conviction could, if only theoretically, put the Montebello Democrat in prison for the rest of his life. If, as Calderon sat in court, he wondered how he got here, he might have begun with his first handshake with a Long Beach hospital owner named Michael Drobot.
Drobot, then 70, was not there that day. He had pleaded guilty to bribery and conspiracy charges in 2014 in exchange for his future testimony against the man he was charged with bribing: Ron Calderon. Drobot had been accused by the Justice Department of masterminding a byzantine web of kickbacks that were paid to dozens of doctors, chiropractors, and others to steer spinal fusion patients to Drobot’s Pacific Hospital or to three other medical facilities in Southern California involved in the conspiracy. Most of the patients had back problems stemming from work-related injuries, and many were low-income Latinos who spoke and read little or no English. Their operations might have been paid for by any of several taxpayer-supported insurance systems available to Californians, including the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, the state’s workers’ compensation system, or—for low-income residents, seniors, and the disabled—Medi-Cal. The surgeries may have also been covered by various private insurance carriers. The four hospitals allegedly stuck the carriers with invoices that were stratospherically higher than the actual value of their billed services.
Calderon is not charged in connection with the medical fraud itself but with taking Drobot’s money in exchange for the senator’s help in ensuring that a highly lucrative law covering spinal surgeries remain unmolested by reform impulses in Sacramento. The broker for these bribes was Drobot’s legislative consultant and a former assemblyman, Tom Calderon—Ron’s brother.
But there is more to the story than kickbacks and creative accounting. Drobot and his associates are also being accused in a cascade of civil lawsuits of supplying surgeons with substandard, knockoff hardware that sometimes broke apart in patients’ bodies. A whistle-blower suit further claims that some of the thousands of patients who had entered Drobot’s hospital and others since 1998 went under the knife “for surgeries that were not medically necessary.”
L to R: Michael Drobot, Tom Calderon, and Ron Calderon
L to R: Michael Drobot, Tom Calderon, and Ron Calderon
PHOTO OF RON BY RICH PEDRONCELLI/AP PHOTO
The FBI raided Ron Calderon’s offices in June 2013; by November he was suspended from the senate until his term expired. He and Tom were indicted together on February 20, 2014. Calderon’s fall was spectacular, but then, Drobot’s scam was so vast, so brazen, and involved so much money that it would become California’s largest case of medical fraud—a category of criminal deceit that has experienced white-hot growth over the past few decades. Half a billion dollars had been paid out to Drobot’s hospital by government and private insurers between 2008 and 2013; the scheme’s kickbacks alone may have amounted to $50 million. While Calderon’s trial is scheduled for May 10, the suits against Drobot, who already faces up to ten years in federal prison, are drifting along in slow motion. Given the animosity between Drobot and his accusers, however, there’s little doubt of the courtroom acrimony that lies ahead. “This is going to be World War III,” a plaintiff’s attorney, Brian Kabateck, promised me.
Spinal fusion operations, intended to alleviate severe chronic back pain, have been around since the early 1900s. Doctors first used them to treat the spinal deformities associated with tuberculosis infections and scoliosis. The 1960s saw the development of special screws that allowed bracing plates and rods to be secured to the ridges of a patient’s spine called pedicles. Suddenly a range of stabilizing hardware could be implanted in patients’ backs, and corrective surgeries that in the past had spotty success rates became more common. With subsequent refinements in the pedicle screws, recovery times were cut dramatically—and the spinal fusion industry exploded. Operations jumped nationally by 70 percent from 2001 to 2011, when they reached 488,300 procedures; the most recent estimates say that more than 600,000 fusion operations are performed annually.
Although the procedure has evolved, the general approach has not: Often it involves a surgeon replacing a damaged disc in the lower back (the lumbar region) or neck (the cervical structure) with a sliver of bone. Sometimes it will first go into a threaded cylinder known as a cage. As it grows, the bone graft fuses with the vertebrae above and below it to stabilize that portion of the spine. For added support the surgeon will install plates or rods, which in the latter case are routed through small loops at the top of pedicle screws that have been drilled into bone. Once implanted, the instrumentation is there to stay—removal can lead to serious injury or death. That is why such parts are made from surgical steel or titanium, which is able to withstand the lifetime of stress a patient’s body will place on them.
The operation usually lasts at least three to four hours and is followed by up to a week’s hospital stay. The typical tab paid by insurers (inevitably more than what hospitals actually charge) is between $80,000 and $150,000, making spinal fusion not only a complex medical procedure, but one of the nation’s most expensive, according to the federal Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. An elective surgery, it’s normally not the kind of operation the average wage earner can afford, but in California spinal fusions have been available for decades through workers’ compensation to people who have suffered job-related back injuries (the procedure accounts for about 40 percent of in-patient bills charged to workers’ comp in the state) and through Medi-Cal. That may be an additional reason for the proliferation of such surgeries. In fact, a considerable number of medical experts believe the procedures are no more effective than physical therapy and can result in permanent postoperative pain. There is even a term for this condition: failed back surgery syndrome.
If injured California workers wanted their backs fixed, the state did its best to guarantee their operations were paid for in full. Until January 1, 2013, Section 5318 of California’s Labor Code mandated that the state should reimburse providers for the individual devices, instrumentation, and pieces of hardware implanted in patients. Providers could bill for the cost of each item, including shipping, handling, and taxes. They could also tack on a 10 percent surcharge, as long as that little bonus didn’t exceed $250 for each item.
The provision was known as the “pass-through allowance.” Its fundamental flaw was that hospitals were already able to charge this same amount when they included costs for pedicle screws and other hardware in their invoices for the surgeries themselves. So hospitals that were willing could double-bill for their hardware costs and inflate them in the process. As it turned out, the pass-through allowance wasn’t a license to print money; it was an ATM card to Fort Knox.
Drobot had begun his hospital management career during the Vietnam War, when as a Navy officer he had run the thousand-bed Oakland Naval Hospital’s outpatient services. Spinal surgeries were not the house specialty of the 29 other hospitals Michael Drobot had managed prior to his purchase of Pacific Hospital. Nor had they been at the seven he had previously owned, including medical centers in Tustin and Rosemead. The Long Beach facility he bought for $4.1 million in 1997 was bankruptcy-bound and catered to Medi-Cal patients. Earlier that decade he left the 15,000-square-foot home he and his wife, Patricia, owned near Seattle (asking price: $17 million) and wound up in posh Corona del Mar in Southern California.
In Washington State Drobot had maintained a low profile, and in California he remained just as inconspicuous. The single published photo of him shows a bald executive in his sixties, looking for all the world like a man trying to overcome a bout of heartburn as he has his picture taken at the DMV. Drobot surfaced briefly in the news in 2008, when he built 18 luxury condominiums in Bandon, Oregon. The coastal site had belonged to the Oceanview Care Center, which was demolished at the order of the local health district. Drobot then bought and developed the property. According to the California Secretary of State’s office, Ron Calderon’s Diversity Political Action Committee spent $104,443 on fundraising events at the nearby Bandon Dunes Golf Resort between 2008 and 2013.
One place Drobot was not low-key was in the hearing rooms of the state’s workers’ compensation board, where he became an assertive—some have said arrogant—presence as he and a bodyguard of experts fought to keep the pass-through allowance. And while avoiding court appearances whenever possible, Drobot has shown an unflinching combativeness by countersuing patients and their lawyers who’ve filed legal complaints against him. He’s also sued dozens of unindicted doctors and business associates with whom he has worked. His lawsuits had a possibly desired chilling effect: For much of last year plaintiffs and their attorneys would not talk to the media.
The hospitals named in the whistle-blower and patient lawsuits are alleged to be linked to Drobot through shell companies that manufactured, distributed, and marketed counterfeit screws and rods. Many of the doctors he is accused of bribing to perform surgeries at Pacific Hospital stand accused of accepting kickbacks to the other three hospitals as well.
Drobot would not speak to me but did, via intermediaries at a crisis communications firm, respond to written queries. Since Pacific had been losing about $21 million per year through its services to charity patients, according to a statement from the firm, “Mr. Drobot had to make changes.” Those changes included pumping up the Medi-Cal trade so that it accounted for 95 percent of Pacific’s business. “He also started,” the statement continued, “a Workers Compensation service to help offset the loss. The workers’ comp business provided a stream of revenue that helped the hospital to stay open and keep its 1,000 employees working.” That is, Drobot tapped a state money hydrant intended to give medical care to injured workers and the state’s poor.
Shortly after he began performing his economic turnaround, though, Drobot was faced with a threat to his back-surgery profits: The workers’ comp rule that had allowed hospitals to charge the state for the cost of the spinal fusion hardware was set to expire at the end of 2001. Drobot started sinking big money into lobbying efforts to maintain that allowance and the loophole that went with it.
The point man for this campaign was Tom Calderon. In 2001, the Los Angeles County Democrat received $65,000 in campaign donations from Drobot and his business ventures; as Calderon’s Assembly Bill 1177, designed to renew the existing reimbursement schedule for spinal fusions, headed to Governor Gray Davis, Drobot ponied up at least $200,000 for Davis’s reelection campaign. Davis signed the bill, which allowed the old reimbursement provisions to be extended until new regulations could be formulated by the state.
Those new regulations came soon enough: That same year Tom Calderon introduced Assembly Bill 749, a massive overhaul of the state’s workers’ compensation system. Among other things, the legislation created the pass-through allowance with the loophole that legislators were slow to grasp and even slower to reform.
For Tom Calderon, the next year proved to be mixed. He had come through brilliantly for Drobot but couldn’t get voters to elect him as their insurance commissioner, despite having received an eyebrow-raising $1.5 million in campaign donations from the insurance industry. Drobot would not permit his champion in the assembly to enter political exile; instead he hired him as his Sacramento consultant. In 2004, Calderon received $1 million from Drobot for helping him browbeat $27.5 million in disputed reimbursements out of the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). Public records suggest that for the next decade Drobot and his associates worked along two tracks: to defeat any attempt in Sacramento to close California’s hardware pass-through loophole and to find new ways of making more money off the backs of patients.
Few people driving past Drobot’s little hospital tucked on a dowdy stretch of Long Beach’s Pacific Avenue would have imagined that behind its brick and stucco walls operated a surgical assembly line that carried out more workers’ comp spinal fusion procedures than Cedars-Sinai. Now sold and transformed into College Medical Center, Pacific Hospital was a split-level complex of one- and two-story wings built in a midcentury Legoland style, too far away to see the ocean, close enough to hear gulls wheeling overhead. The neighborhood’s cluster of rehabs, pharmacies, and medical offices marks it as a place where the old or injured go to recover or die: “Wound Management…Falls Prevention” announces the nearby Royal Care Skilled Nursing Center.
Pacific Hospital’s former Long Beach campus
Pacific Hospital’s former Long Beach campus
PHOTO BY BRITTANY MURRAY/PRESS TELEGRAM
By the time Drobot had built his Oregon condos, he had turned the 184-bed medical center around, and with the help of Ron Calderon’s skill at beating back reform measures from the likes of state senators Ted Lieu and Kevin De León, he succeeded in retaining the pass-through allowance. Under Drobot, Pacific reaped industry praise for curbing hospital-generated infections.
There was even a brief moment in 2008 when Pacific seemed poised to take over Martin Luther King, Jr./Drew Medical Center, the troubled giant that served low-income neighborhoods ten miles to the north in depressed Willowbrook. With Los Angeles County supervisor Yvonne Brathwaite Burke’s blessing, Pacific Hospital was tapped as the outside agency that could restore King/Drew to a semblance of functionality. In fact, through the county’s vetting process, Drobot’s hospital was declared the only facility to completely qualify as King/Drew’s savior, partly because larger, marquee-name hospitals preferred to keep their distance from the controversy-racked medical center.
Doubters, however, questioned how such a small hospital could be chosen to provide administrative triage to King/Drew and protested the closed-door secrecy of the board’s negotiations with Pacific. Those talks fizzled, and the hospital’s candidacy was withdrawn. Then in 2012, a Wall Street Journal report on suspicious billing charges for spinal fusions at Pacific would throw an unwelcome glare on the hospital until it was sold in 2013.
Drobot’s 2014 plea deal closed the door on only one problem, and he entered 2016 free on $5,000 bond while facing several major civil lawsuits. One was filed in federal court under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, in which the SCIF claims Drobot and a list of doctors, business associates, and hospitals massively overbilled the state. A separate whistle-blower suit claims that Drobot and the three other accused hospitals—Tri-City Regional Medical Center in Hawaiian Gardens, Riverside Community Hospital in Riverside, and St. Bernardine Medical Center in San Bernardino—fraudulently overcharged the SCIF and gave kickbacks to doctors who performed back surgeries at these facilities. The suit was filed by Mark Sersansie, who had been employed by one of Drobot’s associates, and by William Reynolds, an insurance fraud investigator who also alleges that Drobot and company illegally manufactured, marketed, and used counterfeit hardware in spinal fusion surgeries.
Until last November Drobot was the only person in the case known to have cut a deal with the federal government. (His sentencing date has continually been postponed, presumably until after he testifies against Ron Calderon.) “Right now the defendants are operating in a pack,” plaintiff’s attorney Brian Kabateck told me last summer. “Nobody’s peeling off yet, but they will.”
Sure enough, on November 24 the Justice Department announced that five key suspects had entered plea agreements with the government. The defendants were James Canedo, Pacific Hospital’s chief financial officer, who admitted his involvement with mail fraud and money laundering; Mitchell Cohen, a spine surgeon who faces a single count of filing a false income tax return; Philip Sobol, another orthopedic surgeon, who pleaded guilty to mail fraud and other charges connected to his receiving kickbacks from Drobot’s hospital; and Alan Ivar, a chiropractor, who admitted to receiving kickbacks in return for referring his patients to surgeons who would then recommend spinal fusion surgery at Pacific Hospital. A fifth defendant, Paul Randall, had been an important marketer for a couple of the implicated hospitals and was accused of paying doctors to steer patients to their operating rooms.
Derika Moses, one of Drobot’s victims
Derika Moses, one of Drobot’s victims
PHOTO BY GREGG SEGAL
In a third civil complaint, 106 former surgery patients sued Drobot, his former associates, and the four hospitals on the grounds they were harmed by substandard hardware that was not approved by the Federal Drug Administration and that broke off in their bodies.
One of those patients was Derika Moses. She was working for Pepsi, delivering sodas to a Riverside County supermarket on Labor Day 2007 when her problems began. “I lifted a case of two-liter bottles when I heard pops in my back and felt it. It took a while for me to leave the store, and when I did, I was still bent over.” Despite months of steroid injections, ice packs, MRIs, and X-rays, her pain persisted. “ ‘The only way I can get you feeling 85 to 95 percent better is with spinal fusion surgery,’ ” Moses recalls her orthopedist saying. She was terrified at the thought of having her back opened up but wanted to be free of her pain. “He went through my workers’ comp insurance and got the clearance. Eight months later I was in for spinal fusion.”
Moses is telling me this in the living room of her Riverside tract home, owned by her parents, where she lives with her 16-year-old daughter, 13-year-old son, and an in-home caregiver who carries her groceries and helps her cook. She says she has remained in pain ever since her spinal fusion. Perhaps that would have been the case without the surgery. Still, in 2013, after more X-rays and MRIs, her surgeon told her a screw had come loose and was hitting a nerve, which explained the constant numbness in her toes.
“Then he said, ‘Well, we can take them out,’ ” she says. “He told me he could never take the cage out because the bone has fused through it. He couldn’t take three pins out because they were holding everything in. But he took out the screws, connectors, and rods.”
Now those 20-plus pieces of fusion hardware might become evidence in the patient suits against her orthopedist and others. Because her operation was not performed at Pacific Hospital, Drobot was severed from Moses’s case last year by a judge, who concluded the same for dozens of other complaints. After that ruling, Drobot still faces 16 patient complaints about substandard hardware.
It’s unclear why the federal government isn’t pursuing the claim that Drobot used knockoff screws. Assistant U.S. Attorney Josh Robbins declined to comment when asked, while SCIF spokeswoman Jennifer Vargen replied by e-mail to say, “As an insurance company, we wouldn’t have a direct cause of action for issues stemming from counterfeit medical hardware allegedly harming a patient.”
The counterfeit hardware charge remains an important accusation in two other complaints. The whistle-blower suit, for example, contends that “plaintiffs are in possession of the counterfeit screws and rods that Defendants have knowingly implanted in hundreds, likely thousands, of California workers.” But the screws were not confined for use in California; they were also sold to hospitals throughout the country.
////
Crowder Machine and Tool Shop occupied space within an anonymous business park in the Riverside County town of Temecula. That’s where, according to lawyers, William Crowder, an octogenarian, fabricated screws and rods that were copies of those manufactured by two legitimate medical equipment suppliers: South Korea’s U&I Corporation and a South African company, Ortho Sol Development. He was working for Roger Williams, a Drobot codefendant who operated a Murrieta, California, distribution company called Spinal Solutions.
The allegedly bogus hardware removed from Moses’s back
The allegedly bogus hardware removed from Moses’s back
PHOTO BY GREGG SEGAL
To an undiscerning eye, the pedicle screws allegedly used by the implicated hospitals might appear legitimate. But not only was U&I’s logo in the wrong font, the screws’ manufacturing lot numbers didn’t correspond with actual serial numbers. In addition, the patients’ suits claim, the screws came with varying thread sizes. One person familiar with Crowder’s work, speaking on condition of anonymity, told me the screws were so roughly executed that their threads bore tiny metal fragments. Citing poor health, William Crowder declined to return phone calls and e-mails requesting comment for this article.
The two whistle-blowers, Sersansie and Reynolds, claim that he billed Drobot’s associates $65 to produce a single screw for which a legitimate surgical hardware manufacturer might charge $400. To be sure, the four hospitals named in the civil complaints are not the only medical centers to use “alternative” hardware. The high price of pedicle screws has motivated some to explore the possibility of manufacturing their own, according to Alan Hilibrand, the director of medical education for the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Rothman Institute at Philadelphia’s Jefferson Medical College. “It’s really gaining more and more traction as a concept,” he says of house-brand spinal hardware. “People are talking about doing it because [the hardware] is so expensive and there’s less money to pay for these surgeries. Some places—not many—are trying to manufacture their own implants. Whether that’s OK or not depends on if they’ve been tested mechanically to show they can stand the stresses required to do the operation.”
Crowder’s screws, though, do not seem to have been made with lowering surgical overhead in mind. At least they didn’t save the state’s health insurance funds any money. Tri-City Regional Medical Center would bill California’s workers’ comp $12,000 or more per screw in an operation that would often require half a dozen screws. But the price wasn’t only jacked up nearly 200 times, according to complaints. The screw was also laundered through a chain of “distributors” and “marketers” that were really shell companies run by Drobot and his confederates. It might ship from Crowder’s shop to Spinal Solutions. Spinal Solutions would then “sell” the product to the Drobot-owned International Implants, which sold the hardware to Drobot’s hospital or to one of the other three defendant medical centers.
An anonymous source familiar with the charges against Drobot and his associates says the alleged counterfeits began rolling out of Crowder’s shop at least by 2008 and possibly earlier. The scheme came to light in 2009, when Spinal Solutions defaulted on its payments to Ortho Sol, the South African company from which it had been purchasing pedicle screws for resale in the United States. “Spinal Solutions,” Ortho Sol’s CEO, Richard Walker, said in an e-mail to me, “not only counterfeited our products but as our distributor stole over a million dollars of our consignment stock.” Ortho Sol dispatched a company auditor to California, who recovered about 5 percent of the screws for which it was owed money. But most of those, Walker said, turned out to be counterfeit.
////
Fridays may be the busiest day of the week for bank robbers, but medical insurance scams occur with metronomic regularity in California. Over the past year eight people in Los Angeles were accused of Medicare grift totaling $66 million, while three Orange County women were convicted of bilking insurance companies out of $71 million in claims for medically unnecessary procedures. Then there were the 16 Glendale residents convicted of running a $20 million bogus prescription-drug racket involving the recruitment of homeless people from Los Angeles’s skid row.
The figures involved Lotto-size jackpots, but the stories barely scratched the news cycle. They are part of an expanding phantom zone of crime seldom reported by the media. Adam Weintraub, a spokesman for California’s Department of Health Care Services, told me that while state agencies are making strides to catch and analyze more quickly the warning signals that go up almost every day from health care providers, staying ahead of scammers is an almost Sisyphean task. “It’s a little like an arms race,” he says. “Criminals are clever and innovative. We have to be the same to keep up.”
In the case of Drobot and his cohorts, what’s amazing is the large number of warning signs there seemed to be. Among them was the fact that many patients, as the Justice Department charges, were encouraged to travel hundreds of miles to Pacific Hospital for their surgeries, even though they could have had them performed closer to home. From 1998 to the end of 2013, Drobot admitted, he offered money to doctors in exchange for their referral of thousands of spinal fusion patients to Pacific Hospital—a transaction that the other three hospitals also allegedly engaged in. Surgeons were typically kicked back $15,000 for a lumbar operation and $10,000 for each cervical fusion surgery performed at Pacific Hospital. Paul Randall, one of the five who’d entered a plea agreement last November, admitted to recruiting chiropractors and doctors to refer patients to the Hawaiian Gardens hospital; the government claimed he had given one chiropractor alone $30,000 in cash.
The kickbacks didn’t exactly arrive in anything so obvious as bags of money. At least not all of them did. According to one of the civil lawsuits, “flights were provided to a large number of spinal surgeons…and transported medical devices and/or instruments, cash, and prostitutes or other ‘adult entertainers’ for the spinal surgeons’ enjoyment.” The doctors’ payments were also allegedly cloaked by invoices for sham consulting agreements, marketing deals, research and development agreements, overinflated pharmacy reimbursements, lease and rental contracts, management arrangements—even rare coins.
All three civil suits allege that the accused hospitals vastly “upcharged” their billing for surgery and prescription drugs by “unbundling” traditional surgical costs. A spinal operation involves an array of medical services (doctors, imaging systems, blood-saving processes, et cetera) that are discounted when they are bundled for an individual operation. Yet Pacific Hospital is accused of billing SCIF separately for each service and at the highest rate possible. It was the equivalent of a car dealership charging for each individual part of an automobile instead of just for the car. And for several years the state paid, but not just for unbundled services and marked-up screws. The hospital also had a habit of billing the state and other insurers for attending nurses who should have been included in the basic surgery bill but who were additionally itemized as “assistant surgeons”—an exaggerated job description that allowed the hospital to claim the nurses cost it more than they did.
What seems to have put Drobot and his schemes on the federal radar were the extraordinary consultant fees he was paying Tom Calderon (who wasn’t a registered lobbyist) and the suspicion that his brother, Ron, was running interference for Drobot in Sacramento. Drobot allegedly supplied the senator with entrée to luxury golf courses, bought him expensive dinners, and flew him around the country on private planes—all in violation of state ethics laws. Ron Calderon returned Drobot’s favors by setting up meetings between himself, Drobot, and a director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, as well as with state senators and others whose ears Drobot was eager to bend on the subject of the pass-through allowance. The senator had been able to spike legislative attempts to close the pass-through loophole in 2011 and then again in 2012. But later that year a third bill came up in Sacramento, and this time Calderon could not stop the pressure for reform. By then, an FBI investigation of Ron Calderon was well under way.
The Bureau started in 2011 with an undercover investigation called Operation Spinal Cap, to dig up enough incriminating evidence to obtain a search warrant for Calderon’s office that would look for, as the document would later state, “all records relating to the spinal surgery legislation” from January 1, 2008, onward. In 2012, three undercover agents set a honeytrap for the senator, posing as people connected to an independent film company based in downtown L.A.’s Arts District. The agents told Calderon they were seeking inclusion in a newly expanded version of the state’s film tax credit program. The cover story made sense—in 2009, California, alarmed by the number of film and TV productions being shot elsewhere, launched a tax credit program aimed at keeping the movie business in state. After all, the author of the bill creating the tax credits had been Ron Calderon, who chaired the state senate’s Film and Television Industries committee.
In order to qualify for a credit, a project has to have a minimum $1 million budget. The FBI “filmmakers” told Calderon they were seeking legislation to lower that threshold to a level that seemed more reasonable to them: $500,000. The senator expressed sympathy for the indie producers before he added that lowering the cutoff to $750,000 would make it easier for him to move it out of his committee.
As part of the alleged bribe, Calderon persuaded the FBI agents to hire his daughter, Jessica, for a $3,000-a-month job that didn’t exist, for more than a year. The FBI was seeing a pattern: Between 2010 and 2012, Drobot had spent about $30,000 bribing Calderon by paying the senator’s son, Zachary, for summer jobs in which the son appears to have been a ghost employee. What had worked for the son was being proposed to the indie filmmakers as a way to grease the legislative wheels.
Sprinkled throughout the affidavit of one undercover agent are snatches of conversation with Calderon. In several instances Calderon sounds like a man trying to cover his tracks. Especially when he explains his contractual precautions while instructing the FBI agent on how to set up payments for his daughter’s ghost job: “The second problem I have…that…um…and again this is an uncomfortable thing to do, OK, but because of my position, you cannot…we cannot have a conversation we just had. We cannot have a quid pro quo conversation.”
A moment later he tries to clarify things: “What…what…what I have to say…what I have to say…is…that I cannot guarantee that I can help you. I can’t. And I cannot take payment…or…uh…negotiate payment for Jessica in any way with the…with the…with the understanding that I’m gonna do this for you, and it’s gonna be deliberate.”
The FBI had no trouble understanding what the senator was hemming and hawing about. “Ronald Calderon,” the undercover agent wrote, was telling him that “you never take money directly from people and you have to be careful about a tit-for-tat relationship.”
Calderon didn’t deliver on lowering the project budget threshold for the FBI’s movie people. He failed to keep the pass-through allowance from being terminated in 2013, too. In the year following closure of the loophole, California’s billing costs for spinal surgeries plunged 56 percent, saving the state $110 million. That figure is only a slight indicator of how much medical fraud bleeds taxpayers.
“Health care fraud and waste costs somewhere in the tens of billions of dollars, but no one knows the real figure,” says Louis Saccoccio, the CEO of the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, a Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group. “Many of these providers started off completely honest and went down a road they should not have.”
Lawyers aren’t complaining—Drobot’s business activities have practically created a legal employment agency in Los Angeles. During a pretrial hearing in the Superior Court Building near Lafayette Park, about half of Department 323’s seating capacity was taken up by attorneys. There were so many, it was not possible to divide the court between plaintiff and defendant lawyers. Those attorneys who could not find table space immediately before Judge Elihu Berle had to fill the jury box so that one of Drobot’s lawyers, former chief deputy city attorney Terree Bowers, sat next to lawyers who were suing his client. The last time I’d seen such an attorney cattle call was at a hearing for Bernie Madoff’s Los Angeles accomplice, Stanley Chais.
////
The legal complaints against Michael Drobot and the doctors and hospitals associated with his business model stagger the imagination not only because of the money or the number of people involved or even its audacity. What may be most disturbing of all is the notion that those we entrust our health to will harm us for profit—that suspicion may surface only as we drift off on a surgery table counting backward from 100. It’s a reality, however, that Derika Moses, like other patient plaintiffs, awoke to in 2007.
The medication Moses has been prescribed since her surgery
The medication Moses has been prescribed since her surgery
PHOTO BY GREGG SEGAL
“A good day is when I’m not falling over every five seconds,” she says, her smile evaporating as she leans to one side at her dining table. Against a wall behind her stand a walker and a back brace. As a teenager at Riverside’s Arlington High School, Moses reigned as the school softball team’s Most Valuable Player for three years and held track and field records in discus, shot put, and running. Since her surgery, she has become a recluse, rarely allowing old friends or even family members to visit and see her in her handicapped state.
Moses hadn’t heard the first fleeting news reports about Ron Calderon or Michael Drobot, but in March 2014 she got a letter from one of the law firms searching for spinal fusion patients who may have received counterfeit hardware. “Normally I’d throw it away,” Moses recalls, “but it said, ‘You might be a victim of counterfeit screws.’ I never suspected this was going on—not a clue.”
She joined the dozens of other former patients in their complaints and is among those who were sued last year by Drobot. He alleged that all the patient plaintiffs and their attorneys were defaming him with their charges. Drobot’s complaint was thrown out in court, and Moses hopes the people involved in his purported enterprise of kickbacks and counterfeit hardware will be “prosecuted or held accountable for what they did. I want to see them lose their licenses.”
Drobot’s plea agreement required him to surrender his passport, but in late September the government handed it back to him so he could travel to Vietnam. The reason he gave to the federal court was his desire to participate in another business venture—specifically, to help his son Greg expand his Oregon-based cheese business. (Another son, Michael Jr., is a defendant in the RICO Act complaint.) None of the doctors accused of having knowingly used counterfeit hardware or who persuaded their patients to undergo unneeded surgery have had their licenses suspended. When I’ve spoken to people connected with this case on or off the record, each has focused on one specific corner of it—screws, prescriptions, kickbacks—leaving the impression that it is too vast to fully comprehend and might yet produce allegations of even more crimes.
Regardless of the outcome of her lawsuit or of what happens to Drobot, his business associates, the doctors, or Ron Calderon, Moses will be in pain for the rest of her life. She says she must go to three or four doctor’s appointments each week and that she has been diagnosed with major depression. Her tone remains stoic when I ask what she regrets most about her life after her accident and surgeries. “I wish I could teach my daughter softball,” she says.
Contributing writer Steven Mikulan is the editor of the online publication Capital & Main. He wrote about the arrest of Whitey Bulger in the October 2013 issue of Los Angeles.
From Headache to Hostage: Terror in Houston against 87 year old woman
FROM HEADACHE TO HOSTAGE: ELDERLY BLACK WOMAN FORCED INTO GUARDIANSHIP AND HOME BEING TAKEN AFTER COMPLAINING OF A SIMPLE HEADACHE
Ms. Doris Davis, 87, has lived in her southeast Houston home since she had it built in 1959. In speaking with the Forward Times (FT), Ms. Davis shared her stories about her upbringing in Houston. She was one of the founding members of Pisidia Missionary Baptist Church when it started in 1972. For over 37 years, she worked her way up from housekeeping all the way to becoming a licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) at Jefferson Davis Hospital.
Ms. Davis knows a thing or two about medicine and about working in a hospital, which is why she called her primary doctor when she felt something strange going on with her health.
According to Ms. Davis, her church mission had gone to a home where she had just taught a Bible lesson when all of a sudden her head began to hurt really badly. Ms. Davis states that she called her Primary Care Physician, Dr. Sandra Scurria, and told her that she was not feeling well and that her head was hurting, to which Ms. Davis states that Dr. Scurria told her that she would call an ambulance to take her to Park Plaza Hospital. Ms. Davis says she never made it to Park Plaza, but was instead taken to Memorial Hermann Hospital, and didn’t know why. Ms. Davis doesn’t remember much of what happened at Memorial Hermann, but states that one day she woke up and was no longer there. This time, she found herself at Garden Terrace Alzheimer’s Center of Excellence in Houston on May 6, 2014, and had no idea why she was there either.
Because she was regularly given drugs and heavily sedated the majority of the time, Ms. Davis vaguely remembers how she got to Garden Terrace, which on their website prides itself as a premier Alzheimer’s and dementia-focused nursing home in Houston; but she says it has nothing to do with her suffering from Alzheimer’s or dementia. Her recollection of that day’s events and past events were as crystal clear as if they had happened a few minutes prior. Ms. Davis does, however, remembering the frustration she had with the staff who she says refused to allow her to call her family or her pastor. She kept a book with important phone numbers in it, including her pastor, but states she was denied use of the phone and no staff members would make any calls for her. She felt like a prisoner and was terrified, she recollects.
“No one knew where I was and how to come visit me,” said Ms. Davis. “All I can remember is one day an elderly tall lady with blonde or gray hair came in to check on me and I was so happy she did because she told me I could call my pastor, so I did.”
Ms. Davis states that she was given medication by needle on several occasions, as soon as she asked the hospital staff to call her family or her pastor, and that she was knocked out after receiving every shot. This happened for about 2-3 days, she recollects. After a few weeks at Garden Terrace, Ms. Davis was then moved to La Hacienda Nursing Home on West Orem, where she currently resides.
It was during this entire time that Ms. Davis’ nightmare became even darker.
Monica D. Shaw has served as the president of the Bayou Terrace Civic Club for over ten years. She has had the responsibility of looking out for the interests and protection of all residents in her community over that period, especially the most vulnerable – the elderly.
On May 10, 2015, Shaw went to visit Ms. Davis and deliver her some Mother’s Day flowers when she received some disturbing information involving Ms. Davis’ situation which forced her to jump into action on behalf of this senior citizen. Shaw has been aggressively seeking to stop the actions that have displaced Ms. Davis from her home; allowed her money to be spent and made her an unwilling “ward” of state through the Harris County Guardianship Program (HCGP).
According to Shaw, Ms. Davis had been forcefully removed from her southeast Houston home, and legally ordered into the HCGP by a judge. She contends that not only has Ms. Davis been taken from her home against her will, her house has been placed on the market and is in the process of being sold as part of a cash sale orchestrated by the HCGP. Shaw has been on a mission to find out how this elderly 87-year old African American female could feasibly be in this situation when she has all of her wits about her and is still able to walk and care for herself.
People are generally referred for Guardianship services by Adult Protective Services, physicians, hospitals, family members or friends. According to Shaw, it was Dr. Chris Merkl, a known Psychiatrist, who initiated a Guardianship referral request on May 16, 2014 for Ms. Davis to be placed in the HCGP. Another doctor is listed as having seen Ms. Davis, but he did not complete the referral. Interestingly, Dr. Merkl is also an “Appointed Doctor” in Probate Court #1 for the same HCGP that he made the referral concerning Ms. Davis to. Dr. Merkl has also been mentioned in an article from April 2015, called “Guardianship in Texas Qualifies the Disqualified and Disqualifies the Qualified,” written by Attorney Candice Schwager that appeared on Examiner.com, where she talks about the issues she witnessed surrounding the Guardianship process here in Texas and specifically highlights Dr. Merkl’s role in certain cases.
The FT reached out to Dr. Merkl to find out more about his initial assessment of Ms. Davis and his recommendation she be placed in the HCGP, but was unable to reach him or hear back from him after leaving a message with his office prior to this story going to print.
Because these doctors are deemed credible professionals, it is not uncommon for a judge to accept a referral from them and move forward with their recommendation. Such was the case involving Ms. Davis, as she was placed in the HCGP and her case has been handled by Judge Mike Wood in Probate Court #2. Ms. Davis was deemed Incapacitated in July 2014 and a Guardianship (Person/Estate) was established with the HCGP. Upon entering the HCGP, the process of liquidating all of Ms. Davis’ assets began and several of her accounts were closed at different respective banks, and a single new account was opened in her name under the HCGP.
On July 29, 2014, the court ordered that Attorney Chris Forbes be appointed Guardian Ad Litem.
The FT did speak with Judge Wood, who indicated that the case was still pending and that he was not at liberty to speak on the status of pending cases or could not discuss any medical and other health information with us due to HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) laws which keeps that information private and protected.
Going even further, Attorney Valerie Milholland, Asst. County Attorney for the Office of Harris County Attorney Vince Ryan, went before the judge and insisted that Ms. Davis’ house be sold, along with its contents, in order to take care of Guardianship expenses and her personal needs.
To date, Ms. Davis states the HCGP has not spent a dime on her, with the exception of paying some select Guardianship expenses, legal expenses and nursing home expenses. According to court records, thousands of dollars have been expended and several thousand dollars are consistently being spent from funds of her estate every month. Per Shaw, the following funds have been ordered to be distributed from her estate to date:
05-19-2015 Ordered to pay Attorney Chris Forbes $1245.00
06-08-2015 Ordered HCGP to Expend $5422.00 per month
10-22-2015 Ordered HCGP to Expend $3715.00
10-22-2015 Ordered HCGP to Expend $6592.00 per month
The FT reached out to Attorney Milholland and spoke to a representative from the Harris County Attorney’s Office to get more information on the status of Ms. Davis’ home and why she was placed in the HCGP, but did not hear back from them prior to this story going to print.
When the order was given to allow HCGP to spend that amount of money from the estate, Monica Shaw knew she had to do something more, so she had an application to Appoint Successor Guardian filed by Attorney Andrew McGee on her behalf. It was then that Attorney Milholland, on behalf of HCGP, sought to sell her home in order to pay for these Guardianship expenses ordered by the court. On Aug. 6, 2015, an order was signed by Associate Judge Ann Green to sell Ms. Davis’ personal property, including her home, at a private sale for cash.
Soon after the order, an Application to Sell Real Property was executed by Aline Kyle-Taylor, the appointed Harris County Guardian who has the Power of Attorney to act on Ms. Davis’ behalf. Ms. Davis was served with a Notice of Sale by a Precinct 7 Constable, although she states no prior notice had been given. The process to sell her home was well on its way.
The FT spoke to Aline Kyle-Taylor to discuss Ms. Davis’ case, but she declined comment and indicated her supervisor would reply, but did not hear back from them prior to this story going to print.
Shaw immediately filed an Objection to Sell of Property in order to stop the sale of Ms. Davis’ home, and started to see that things had seemingly gone from bad to worse.
“The way this situation has gone down, I feel like Doris (Ms. Davis) is being legally abused and taken advantage of because of her age,” said Shaw. “I want to give Doris what she wants, and that is to live in her own home and be out from under a program that she doesn’t even know why she was placed in the first place. The community needs to be aware that families and concerned citizens have to stand firm, because being involved in the daily lives of our senior citizens is imperative. This is terrifying and should concern us all.”
On Feb. 23, 2016, Shaw took Ms. Davis to court for a hearing on the Objection to Sell her property. Upon hearing the case, Shaw states that Judge Wood gave her one week to have Ms. Davis seen by a doctor that would state that she is “Not Incapacitated” and submit a report to court indicating that by Mar. 2, 2016. Shaw helped Ms. Davis schedule an appointment the very next day, Feb. 24, 2016, to visit Dr. Ivan Spector, who had previously treated Ms. Davis from 2007 to 2010. Dr. Spector performed an exam to determine her incapacity, and it was determined, per a letter submitted to courts by Dr. Spector on behalf of Ms. Davis, that she was “Not Incapacitated” as initially reported by the initial referring doctor.
To date, the case is still pending in Judge Wood’s court. Per Judge Wood, the letter was received from Dr. Spector and is being reviewed. In the meantime, he also indicated that the Ad Litem Attorney has requested another doctor re-evaluate Ms. Davis to determine her status.
The HCGP was organized in 1992 by the Harris County Commissioners Court to provide management and monitoring services to indigent persons who were deemed incapacitated by the Probate Courts and to serve as a last resort service for poor adults who are unable to care for their own physical needs or financial affairs because of physical or mental conditions. Currently, the HCGP provides Guardianship services to over 1,400 wards and is the largest Guardianship program in the entire state of Texas. About 40 percent of Harris County wards are 40 to 59 years old and 28 percent are 60 to 79. The majority of them have mental illness, a developmental disability or mental deterioration, such as Alzheimer’s disease or dementia.
The HCGP is also designed for poor adults who have been exploited, neglected or abused, and have no family members or friends willing or able to care for them. This is not the case concerning Ms. Davis. Her nephew lived with her at the time of her forced removal from her home, and he had no say concerning the Guardianship decision.
Ms. Davis states that she is being forced to be in a Guardianship program and pay for a nursing home that provides nothing but a roof over her head. She has been under constant worry about the status of her house, because she doesn’t know if it has been sold to someone else. She is being given psych meds regularly; makes her own bed; changes her own sheets; bathes herself; feeds herself; never sees the doctor assigned to her care; takes walks alone; dresses herself; and her church members wash her clothes for her.
Ms. Davis has a home that is paid for, where she was peacefully living prior to this fiasco, and she wants this nightmare to end so that she return to the only place she has called home for over 50 years. Shaw is seeking to become Ms. Davis’ legal guardian and has several concerns that she hopes to see addressed and several questions she is seeking answers to.
One of the most pressing questions she has is, “If there are reliable and competent individuals, including family members, who are interested in caring for their loved one, why would they deny them that ability and force them to be a “ward” of the state?”
The FT will continue to monitor this situation and seek answers to the question that Shaw has, as well as the many other questions surrounding how Ms. Davis, who appears to be of sound mind with a near spotless recollection of things, ended up in the HCGP in the first place.
Exactly what we need in probate for our victims the DOJ did for family court victims
Now, this was 2 years ago, but take a look:
US Department of Justice calls for examples of outrageous child custody outcomes

Concerned parents were elated this week when a much awaited segue for them to speak came forward as an invitation from the federal government, asking for clarifications on identified problems with child human rights in court, family rights in court and the lack of a uniform structure to respond to child sex abuse investigations, child abuse investigations and placement of children with a parent who is not known to them, has committed crimes against the other parent or is convicted of crimes that put the child at risk in their care.
Following a march on Washington DC and a Congressional Briefing this Summer members of Congress heard and were concerned about the severity and frequency with which child custody issues are mishandled, to the point of injury to the child or protesting parent. http://www.examiner.com/article/justice-and-mercy-national-safe-child-co… It is remarkable that BOTH events happened despite the sequester, AND that these actions generated interest and an invitation.
Some cases are so problematic, as with the classic case illustrated in the October 2012 Documentary of Holly Collins, called “No Way Out But One”, that the parent is forced to flee the situation, due to deafness in authorities, investigators, systems system law and policy, court law and policy, and court systems. Succinctly, the definition of being run into the ground by such system based problems is called “Systems Induced Trauma.” Beyond victimization in a specific social or family situation, the family, one or all members are further agitated, abused or traumatized by the applied services and policies of systems that interlock without oversight, basically trapping the persons perpetuating a complaint without safety and resolutions.
The US Department of Justice is ready now to consider cases of chaos caused by State child and family courts. USDOJ is calling for child custody outlines in a format. The purpose of providing the outline is for the writer to simply and systematically give structured information regarding the problem case in question.
The US Department of Justice wants timelines of these outrageous cases.
Just complete and send your case in this format to
+++++++++++++ ADDRESS Corrected 12.24.2013 Mary Seguin at ricourtcon@gmail.com
by January 15, 2014 so she can provide them to the DOJ. The USDOJ invitation was issued to the representing group at the Summer March and Congressional Briefing :
The California Protective Parents Association.
Format for the Letter to the USDOJ
Who you are:
1. Contact information:
2. Background:
3. Education:
4. Former employment:
5. Criminal record (arrests and convictions):
Who your former partner/husband is:
1. Background:
2. Education:
3. Former employment:
4. Criminal record (arrests and convictions):
Reports of physical or sexual assault/battery and/or incest:
Law enforcement (give name of office and address):
Date, Name and title of officer, Outcome of investigation and report:
Child Protective Services (give name of office and address):
Date, Name and title of worker, Outcome (including not reporting to criminal authorities to investigate):
Court personnel (give title and address):
Date, Name and title of professional, Outcome(including not reporting to criminal authorities to investigate):
Other government entities:
Date, Name and title of professional, Outcome (including not reporting to criminal authorities to investigate):
Intimidation against you that deterred you from reporting:
1. Who intimidated you:
2. How were you intimidated:
Gag orders:
1. Who gave you a gag order (name, title, date, place):
2. Rationale given for gag order to not talk about these recurring crimes of incest and assault and battery.
Removal of child(ren) from you after you reported criminal physical or sexual assault/battery and/or incest:
1. Name and title of person(s) recommending your children be removed from you
2. Date of recommendation and where recommendation was filed:
3. Name and title of person ordering your children removed from you:
4. Date of order and where order was filed:
Supervised visitation:
1. Name and title of person recommending you be placed on supervised visits
2. Reason given for recommendation:
3. Name and title of person who ordered you to supervised visits:
4. Date and place order was made:
5. Name of specific visitation center you were ordered to attend:
6. Amount of fees:
7. Dates and times you were ordered to attend:
8. If you were not ordered to a specific visitation center, name of visitation center you chose:
9. Was this center paid by the county:
Motions you filed for relief:
1. Date and place filed:
2. Who filed the motion:
3. What lawyers were involved:
4. Outcome of the motion:
At the end of the time line, please provide a note,
“Supporting Evidence is being compiled in Exhibits.”
Parents in and out of cps courts and family/divorce courts face a hamsterwheel of demands, which beyond the direct trauma to the family, often exhaust financial and emotional resources, cost jobs and personal assets.
Most everyone knows at least ONE case like this one. Please pass this article along to others who may be affected.
Also, subscribe to Diana Winslow on examiner.com, OKC. Winslow, a 25 year provider of clinical mental health and addictions writes and advocates regularly for better care of her own family members and the community at large. Diana has planned professional retirement in December 2013 and seeks supports to continue work such as this and other issues that affect the quality of life for children and families.
Other articles such as this, explain struggles here that may match struggles or solutions in your community. http://www.examiner.com/article/policy-custom-or-law-oklahoma-courtrooms
Penn. RCC church scandal continues–where was law enforcement?

How low can the Probate court system go? Marriage and Love annulled in court
Of course, we all know from Eliot Bernstein’s troubles in Florida and from the absolutely horrendous miscarriages of justice for Attorney Barbara Stone, the court system can reach the 7th level of Dante’s Inferno and just keep on digging together with the back hoe from Satan comes this truly terrifying article.
For sure Satan never sleeps.
Appeals court allows marriage to be annuled in guardianship
Access to MyPalmBeachPost.com included for Post subscribers
Senior Glenda Martinez’s quest to reverse a Palm Beach County judge’s decision annulling her marriage in a controversial guardianship case took a hit Wednesday when an appellate court ruled against her.
A blistering dissenting opinion, though, might fuel the issue right up to the Florida Supreme Court.
The annulment of the 2011 marriage between Martinez and 85-year-old J. Alan Smith, formerly of Boynton Beach, came at the urging of a court-appointed guardian. The judge in the case had initially ignored Smith’s preneed health directives naming Martinez as his health surrogate.
Both issues underscore the great power the courts have over seniors found to be incapacitated.
Martinez set legal precedent last year when the 4th District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach ruled in her favor and ordered a judge to return Smith — sent to a nursing home by the guardian — to her care. On Wednesday, a three-judge panel ruled against her in upholding Circuit Judge David French’s annulment of their marriage, saying Smith failed to ask the court’s permission to exchange vows.
Appeals Judge Martha Warner, who authored the first opinion on the pre-need directive, wrote an 8 1/2-page dissent that sets the stage for a review by the whole 4th DCA and maybe the Florida Supreme Court.
“This frail gentlemen has been deprived of his fundamental right to marry, in proceedings which violated his fundamental rights to due process and without a consideration of his best interest,” she said.
Warner wrote the right to marry is a fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, stating that French could easily have ratified the marriage. She said French’s ruling violated the legislative intent of lawmakers that the rights of seniors in guardianships be protected.
Warner also noted that the lawyer appointed to represent Smith cooperated with the guardian to petition the court to annul the marriage even though Smith couldn’t speak.
The majority opinion of the panel — Judges Dorian Damoorgian and Melanie May — reiterated the guardianship statute, which says that incapacitated seniors who have lost their right to enter into contracts cannot marry unless the court approves.
Martinez’s attorney Jennifer Carroll said she has 15 days to ask the panel of three judges or all of the judges on the 4th DCA to review the case. She can also ask the Florida Supreme Court to look at it, as well.
“This gentleman was deprived of this fundamental right,” Carroll said. “He was also deprived of other fundamental constitutional rights, including his right to be represented by independent counsel. I believe this case has serious constitutional ramifications, and I believe the opinion raises issues of great public importance.”
An annulment in guardianship can have a domino effect after the incapacitated senior dies in determining the benefits for the surviving spouse. The Palm Beach Post reported how annulment proceedings initiated by a guardian can drain the estate of the senior in its series Guardianship: A Broken Trust.
The Post wrote how the judiciary appears to do little to stop the funnelling of the life savings of incapacitated seniors into the pockets of guardians and their attorneys — even when families believed they’d found evidence of malfeasance. Numerous statewide complaints about professional guardians taking financial advantage of incapacitated seniors in guardianship spurred the state Legislature to pass regulatory reform last month.
After The Post’s series, Chief Circuit Judge Jeffrey Colbath announced guardianship reforms, including training, a new system of appointing guardians and the transfer of Circuit Judge Martin Colin, whose wife works as a professional guardian.
Martinez now takes care of Smith at her home in Miami, but said the guardian left Smith’s finances in ruins and she has trouble paying his medical bills. She called the DCA’s decision upholding the annulment, “a horrible, horrible thing.”
Her case is particularly unsettling, Carroll said, because a previous judge told professional guardian John Cramer that Martinez and Smith’s marriage was valid and for him to back off. Instead, he aligned with the attorney who was supposed to represent Smith’s interest: Lynne Hennessey.
Warner was particularly perturbed at Hennessey’s role in the annulment.
“As there is not evidence on the record that Smith himself expressed any wish to annul his marriage, there is nothing to support Hennessey’s filing of this petition,” Warner wrote.
Hennessey could not be reached for comment.
Dr. Sam Sugar, who is co-founder of Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship in Aventura, said court-appointed attorneys for incapacitated seniors are often co-opted by the professional guardian. If they don’t cooperate, they may have their fees opposed by the guardian, he said.
“If they rock the boat to actually represent the best interests of the ward rather than the system, their income will suffer,” Sugar said. “The ward’s interests are always secondary to that.”
WHAT THE POST FOUND
The savings of incapacitated seniors flow into the household of Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Martin Colin.
courtesy of Colin’s wife — professional guardian Elizabeth “Betsy” Savitt. Fees in most of her cases were approved by another judge who is a friend of her husband’s. Colin approved the fees of her lawyers in other cases.
HOA program on fraud and deceit 3/19/14
From Cynthia Stevens Homeowner’s accountability advocate:
From: Cynthia Stephens <cynthiastphns1@aol.com>
Sent: Mar 18, 2016 8:36 AMSubject: OTC with Shu and Bill Davis – Saturday, March 19th, 2016 at 2:00pm, or anytime thereafter, on http://www.onthecommons.us, or http://www.onthecommons.net!
“The veil needs to be lifted” and the truths need to be told!
I trust this will be another incredible On the Commons with Shu Bartholomew and Bill Davis!“The earliest deed restricted communities were exclusionary and were honest enough to admit the reason of their existence. It wasn’t until we got to the mass production of these neighborhoods that we see the entire HOA house of cards was built on a foundation of deceit. It started as a way of allowing local municipal governments to collect “free” tax money while the homeowners ended up paying twice for the same services. At one point Declarations started off by saying, “The purpose of this association is to protect property values”. Unable to substantiate that claim, I don’t think they include that statement any more. But the “purpose for HOAs” was out there. And once you start off by telling a lie, more and more lies will have to be told to cover up for the first one. And of course, every lie will need some form of enforcement mechanism.
Dismantling this house of cards before the entire system collapses and millions of people are hurt financially and emotionally is a tough job. It is, however, something that will need to be done. ” Shu Bartholomew, onthecommons.us
The entire show announcement for Saturday, March 19th, 2016 with Shu and Texas HOA homeowner attorney, Bill Davis:
Hosted and produced by Shu Bartholomew, On The Commons is a weekly radio show dedicated to discussing the many issues surrounding mandatory homeowner associations, the fastest growing form of residential housing in the nation.
This Week’s Show
The earliest deed restricted communities were exclusionary and were honest enough to admit the reason of their existence. It wasn’t until we got to the mass production of these neighborhoods that we see the entire HOA house of cards was built on a foundation of deceit. It started as a way of allowing local municipal governments to collect “free” tax money while the homeowners ended up paying twice for the same services. At one point Declarations started off by saying, “The purpose of this association is to protect property values”. Unable to substantiate that claim, I don’t think they include that statement any more. But the “purpose for HOAs” was out there. And once you start off by telling a lie, more and more lies will have to be told to cover up for the first one. And of course, every lie will need some form of enforcement mechanism.Dismantling this house of cards before the entire system collapses and millions of people are hurt financially and emotionally is a tough job. It is, however, something that will need to be done.Bill Davis joins us On The Commons. Bill, an attorney in Texas, switched his practice to representing homeowners and consumers. And having made that switch, he has been very busy ever since. I love listening to his stories about some of his cases. I am not sure if the “interesting” cases just naturally gravitate towards him or if Bill has a natural talent for zeroing in on the absurdities of HOAs, board members and the attorneys and managers who spend their time propping them up. I always enjoy talking to Bill and listening to his theories and his stories and this interview is no exception.Share your stories on
On The Commons is broadcast every Saturday from 2-3 PM ET on Radio Fairfax. In the Northern Virginia area, On The Commons can be heard on Cox Cable, Channel 37 and Verizon Channel 37. On Comcast channel 27 in Reston in addition to several more cable channels all across Northern Virginia. To listen LIVE globally on the internet, go to Radio Fairfax and click on “Stream Radio Fairfax” and if you are on the go, on your mobile devices, Radio Fairfax Mobile The show will be available on On the Commons shortly afterwards. Please also visit our archives at On the Commons.Shu BartholomewHost and producerOn The Commons is produced by OTC Multimedia Productions
On The Commons │ onthecommons@cox.net | Visit our website2929-Eskridge Rd. Suite SFairfax, VA 22031
On The Commons, 2929-Eskridge Rd, Suite S, Fairfax, VA 22031
From Atty Candice Schwager–Granny, get your gun!
Granny Get Your Gun! Guardians coming?
Homeland Security! Love it! Don’t think I’m joking Granny. It’s not if, but when..
The most sacred thing Americans have been willing to die for since the beginning—is FREEDOM—and that is no where more true–than during the time of the Revolutionary War in America. The founding fathers picked up their guns and fought a tyrannical government, seeking to enslave them all over again—because they had just a taste of freedom. Thomas Jefferson reminded the people of the dangers of big government to individual liberties, stating that a government big enough to give you everything is strong enough to take everything you have.
Our fathers learned these truths through personal suffering and giving their lives to change it for future generations. Our founding fathers were PATRIOTS who loved this Country and Freedom with everything they had and some gave just that much. Why? Death was preferable to returning to slavery in an oppressive government of tyrants where they were involuntarily made slaves to the monarchy. For them, death was preferable than going back, leading Patrick Henry to shout, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”
Jefferson was painfully aware of this truth, stating “the price of freedom is eternal vigilance,” [because] “when the people fear the government, there is tyranny, [but] when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” He insisted that inevitably, freedom would demand more bloodshed, stating “the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of Patriots and Tyrants”—on occasion. He believed America had two enemies: “criminals and the government; so let us tie the Second down with the chains of the Constitution so the Second will not become a legalized version of the First.”
Benjamin Franklin similarly could not fathom returning to bondage and said “those would would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” This is because, as John Adams warned, “Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.” Our founders “understood” and joined in unity—facing death to find life. George Washington, said “it is infinitely better to have a few good men than many indifferent ones,” stating “the thing that separates the American Christian from every other person earth is the fact that he would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.” Oh, that men and woman had even a clue of that kind of honor anymore.
Patrick Henry helped motivate those with lingering doubt, saying, “We should not forget that the spark which ignited the American Revolution was caused by the British Attempt to confiscate the firearms of the colonists.” He then famously said, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” and charged ahead win or lose.
After the founders risked their lives—for our freedom, we find ourselves bound in chains all over again with the Obama Administration proposing that our guns be seized. The Supreme Court is now dissecting the meaning of ordinary words to determine that our 200 year understanding of the Second Amendment was wrong and convince us that ordinary citizens are not granted the right to bear arms but only “well regulated militia.” See Heller vs. District of Columbia, 2008
The few rights we still have as American citizens hang by a thread—in the form of one swing vote on the Supreme Court that could go either way. In this climate, I am not hopeful after reading the Heller case. Though the case was a victory for those who cherish their right to protect their families by the use of firearms, one vote and we would all be wondering “what happens next, without guns to protect ourselves”—or headed straight into another American Revolution.
Truly frightening is that realization because for the founding fathers who authored the Declaration of Independence and Constitution’s Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment was never remotely ambiguous.
Samuel Adams said “the Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” Somehow, that statement is not clear to Barack Obama or the Supreme Court, 4 of whom actually sided with Obama. For the time being, the five justices who authored the majority opinion have bought us time.
It’s high time to go shopping, guys. You coming granny?
******************************
from Joanne:
Thanks for posting this! It is excellent.
From Ken Ditkowsky to Atty Gen. Loretta Lynch
|
Attorney General Lynch –
I am forwarding this e-mail to you to demonstrate that my e-mails are not lone Cries in the Wilderness. Nationwide, the elderly and the disabled who have a few dollars in their jeans are being exploited. Elder Cleansing is a way of life for the corrupt and amoral political and judicial elite who prey on the aforesaid elderly and disabled and their families.
Florida, Illinois, Texas, Arizona, California, Pa, Ohio ***** all have the same problem. As I live in Illinois, I’ve had the opportunity to witness some of the most disreputable of the miscreants including Jerome Larkin, the administrator of the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (IARDC). The GAO has written four reports to congress and they all can be found on the NASGA website. Probate Sharks blog and MaryGSykes blogs detail some of the most horrendous civil rights violations by sitting judges and their corrupt co-conspirators.
Only the Nazi war criminals invaded the mouths of their victims for the gold in their teeth; however, Alice Gore was victimized right in Cook County, Illinois. Anguished cries of horror from her family were met with Larkin informing the family that the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission found the infamy perfectly ethical, and when Attorney JoAnne Denison exposed the corruption on her blog the Illinois Supreme Court issued an interim suspension of her law license and accepted Larkin’s thesis that reporting corruption in compliance with Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4 was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater!
Criminals such as Larkin belong in jail – his claim to be a lawyer is ‘akin to a material misrepresentation of fact! and consumer fraud.’
Enjoy to book review and the book!
Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/guardianship-how-judges-and-lawyers-steal-your-money.html
GUARDIANSHIP: How Judges And Lawyers Steal Your MoneyBook Review: GUARDIANSHIP: How Judges and Lawyers Steal Your Money M. Larsen, Ed., 2016; Pub: Janet Pipes; ISBN: 9780692586211. Price: $13.38. Available HERE
Setting the stage for Michael Larsen’s collection of personal accounts of escalating crimes against the elderly in probate courts, one typical story from the reference manual, GUARDIANSHIP, describes the techniques probate judges, attorneys and predatory guardians use to plunder the wealth of the elderly, destroying their remaining years:
|
From Ken Ditkowsky –numerous statutory provisions not adhered to by courts
|
It occurred to me that after reading today’s newspaper that too many of us operate under the credo – do not bother me with the facts, I’ve made up my mind.
For months I’ve been referring to the protections afforded by statute to disabled people that corrupt judges and lawyers ignore and 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 violators such as Jerome Larkin of the Illinois lawyer disciplinary commission (IARDC) seek to obfuscate. If we examine 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 as an example, I can illustrate exactly why Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators do not wish any investigation of their conduct much less an HONEST INVESTIGATION.
By use of footnotes, I’m going to explain the statute [1], to wit:
Information maintained by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Updating the database of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) is an ongoing process. Recent laws may not yet be included in the ILCS database, but they are found on this site as Public Acts soon after they become law. For information concerning the relationship between statutes and Public Acts, refer to the Guide.
Because the statute database is maintained primarily for legislative drafting purposes, statutory changes are sometimes included in the statute database before they take effect. If the source note at the end of a Section of the statutes includes a Public Act that has not yet taken effect, the version of the law that is currently in effect may have already been removed from the database and you should refer to that Public Act to see the changes made to the current law.
|
|
|
You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or canceled if you do not attend.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE. Service of summons and the petition may be made by a private person 18 years of age or over who is not a party to the action. (f) Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing. [7] (Source: P.A. 98-49, eff. 7-1-13; 98-89, eff. 7-15-13; 98-756, eff. 7-16-14; 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.) |
Dorothy Brown, while under Fed probe, declares victory
One of the things you notice about the Clerk of Court for Cook County is that the Federal Courts went electronic almost over night back in 2000, and here we are in 2016 and no electronic access to court records! Why? You can’t fudge with electronic records as easily as you can paper files. It took DB years to get this done–2016, and you still can’t search court records for 8 cents per page on the internet.
But what has DB been doing during all that time? Feathering her nest. Court records show she was exchanging jobs for cash. This was all recorded by an employee months ago and given to the FBI to start a federal probe to remove her.
Read on to see what KKD has to say about all of this. I will get the amended civil complaint against DB to publish.
|
Very well said, Ken. Very sad reality though!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:19 PM, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
Unbelievable–shocking report that Ohio is running T4 programs in hospice
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwbVR5VUJTUnU1RWs
If you take a look at this police report you will find out that the Ohio police are refusing to do tox screens on elderly people in “hospice”. They claim that excessive amounts of drugs that kill the people are required to “alleviate suffering.” That is absolutely utter nonsense. Drug limits are put in place to protect people while at the same time providing pain relief. It is a violation of the license of doctors and nurses to give patients excessive psychotropic drugs to “alleviate suffering and pain.” The FDA controls what drugs and how much of the drugs may be given to these patients. Only a court may order that food and hydration may be with held to kill a person — ever.
Take for example, the Michael Jackson case. It is reported he was in great pain, he had severe sleep disorders and his doctor was giving Propofol–a drug never used outside a hospital, it is a strong sedative. The following wiki page documents the entire case:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Murray
Michael Jackson was obviously a beloved celebrity so the police had to do the right thing or the public outcry would have been deafening.
But an elderly, unknown person in guardianship–Sykes, Claire Miller, Tyler, Drabik, Frake, etc. are just people to target, drain the estate and eliminate.
Claire Miller was obviously put to death under Ohio’s new T-4 program (T-4 is the program Hitler used to kill deformed, babies, children and then the mentally, and then he went on to kill ****. The T-4 program is reported on this blog in another post in greater detail and on Wiki).
Michael Jackson’s doctor was sentenced to 4 years of incarceration for involuntary manslaughter when he was blatantly using a hospital grade sedative Propofol, to treat Jackson’s pain and sleep disorder without the appropriate precautions, treatment standards, safety equipment and protocol–as determined by the FDA for dispensing such a drug.
Why is it that Michael Jackson’s death matter, but not that of Claire Miller? How is it that the Ohio police are running what is in essence a T-4 program for the elderly and disabled without court orders and denying loved ones tox screens and investigations. Roseanne Miller believes that her father was murdered by the lawyers and judge in her father’s case. I would like to know the difference between this linked police report and Hitler’s T-4 program.
Elderly lives do matter and that is not how a free, open and civilized democracy is supposed to function.
Gloria Sykes and others have asked the authorities for a tox screen in her mother’s death. So far no action. Bev Cooper has asked for a tox screen in her mother’s death when she was narcotized to death, after having a feeding tube implanted against her will, being forced into a nursing home 30 miles from her beloved daughter’s home because the name Es**** was on it, then 29 gold teeth were pulled and not inventoried.
These demands have been made to the authorities.
How is it Jackson’s doctor can be convicted, autopsies and tox screens done, but not for a 94 year old and a 99 year old widow?
These women were important too and beloved by their children, friends and family.
Nope, not Michael Jackson, but still beloved and cherished.
Joanne
From Ken Ditkowsky–some thoughts on election day
It’s Chicago, get out there and vote early and often.
A turkey for every democratic voter on the way out the polls.
|
Apolitical Aphorisms
If God wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates. ~Jay Leno~ The problem with political jokes is they get elected. ~Henry Cate, VII~ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~Aesop~ If we got one-tenth of what was promised to us in these State of the Union speeches, there wouldn’t be any inducement to go to heaven. ~Will Rogers~ Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river. ~Nikita Khrushchev~ When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I’m beginning to believe it. ~Clarence Darrow~ Why pay money to have your family tree traced; go into politics and your opponents will do it for you. ~Author unknown~ Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go out and buy some more tunnel. ~John Quinton~ Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich, by promising to protect each from the other. ~Oscar Ameringer~ I offer my opponents a bargain: if they will stop telling lies about us, I will stop telling the truth about them. ~Adlai Stevenson, campaign speech, 1952~ A politician is a fellow who will lay down your life for his country. ~ Tex Guinan~ I have come to the conclusion that politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians. ~Charles de Gaulle~ Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks. ~Doug Larson~ There ought to be one day — just one — when there is open season on senators. ~Will Rogers~ Ken Ditkowsky
|
Suspension from NC–the system of corruption is endemnic!
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwR2JlN05CSmtOSEk
|
Dear Mike I was recently served with your notice of suspension. See attached.
I have to tell you that I was extremely disappointed in your conduct as an attorney and officer of the court of North Carolina.
I invite you to read my blog about probate corruption and in particular the case of Mary G Sykes, which I was disciplined over. She was targeted, her estate was drained for attorneys and nursing home fees, she was isolated from 20+ friends and family, including a beloved and long time care giver her daughter, Gloria Sykes. http://www.marygsykes.com. Almost all of her estate went to attorneys fees and she was drugged and placed in repeated nursing homes against her will. It is utterly not true that there was no basis for my statements, all the pleadings and evidence are published on my blog. Mary Sykes is now dead, having passed over on May 23, 2015 when she was narcotized to death because no one intervened, not the Illinois ARDC, the NC state bar which was informed of the controversy, the Illinois Supreme Court, nor any of the numerous states attorneys and police that were well informed of the facts of the situation well in advance of this occurence.
Ms. Gloria Sykes, who fought for her mother courageously, is an award winning investigative journalist with a degree in Journalism from Northwestern University Illinois. She is highly respected in her industry and has done interviews with Gacy and other serious cases. She fought hard to get her mother out of an abusive guardianship with no jurisdiction (I assume you did not read the pleadings on this which I send you. Please find jurisdiction in this case, you have the Record on Appeal, where is it?)
My case involved blogging about corruption. In Illinois, the Appellate court has declared that the courts have no jurisdiction over the media because we do have First Amendment rights. (In re Weddigen, 4th district, appellate 2015 Illinois).
I consider this to be notice to you that you have suppressed my first amendment rights which violates 42 USC 1983, 42 USC 242 and other statutes relating to First Amendment suppression. The FBI division on human and civil rights has been bcc’d on this email.
I am asking at this time that you turn over the names of any others that you know of who have participated in this crime according to 18 USC sec 4 which makes it a felony not to report this activity to the authorities. Suppression of First Amendment rights is a Federal Felony. Further, just because someone says “zero tolerace” that does not mean zero brains in reviewing a case. You ought to take that notion seriously. Go ahead at Westlaw, Lexus and Fastcase the cases on “zero tolerance” in Illinois. A justicable decision must still be made.
I appreciate your prompt cooperation.
I would appreciate your making a statement. I am scheduled for a TV show on abuse guardianships and corruption in the courts on 3/23/16. You are welcome to appear. Please email Bev Cooper at her address above if you wish to appear and she will give you directions to the studio and the time to appear before broadcast. If I do not hear from you I will inform the viewers you did not respond to media requests for statements and inquiry.
Thank you for sending this to me. At least we have your name for supporting nationwide corruption from the lawyers in North Carolina. You should note that the Illinois Supreme Court will NOT name any justice responsible for suspending me. The ones at the ARDC have already been outed for fixing cases (my chair Sang Yul Lee and Anna Loftus, the puppet of Anne Burke on the Illinois Supreme Court. None of these have responded to inquires concerning their behavior but I have reported them to the local FBI and asked that their offices be bugged for “special deals” to support corruption in the courts.) You should be made aware. I am from Illinois, the land of most governors in orange jumpsuits in 2 decades)
JoAnne Denison
cc: www.marygsykes.com and dozens of other probate blogs and new media.
|
From Ken Ditkowsky — a real public outcry is out there
|
Take a look at today’s WSJ. Then brose the articles and notice that our democracy is being made a mockery.
Sedition is becoming a norm. Even though we have a First Amendment, a lawyer who exposes or protests corrupt judges, lawyers, judicial officials etc can kiss his/her law license goodby; however, a lawyer who pleads guilty to breach of fiduciary relationships, health care frauds in the 100s of millions of dollars is given a pass. A presidential candidate has zero tolerance for dissension in his audiences, and billionare George Soros is lauded for sending hoodlums to attempt to disrupt rallies. No one seems to care about the First Amendment.
Tomorrow there will be vote fraud of monumental proportions. Every senior being elder cleansed can be expected to turn out and vote for ******, if they have not voted early, by absentee ballot etc. Need proof. Count the number of signs on homes and businesses for Mrs. Clinton! Ride by the Auditorm Theater and see the crowd! Indeed, I am biased! However, I am not deaf and I am not blind.
My friend Lanre Amu lost his license for practicing law while black! I have a bit of trouble reconciling that act with democracy. Seth Gilman breached a fiduciary relationship, stole from the USA and he is given a pass by the Illinois Disciplinary Commission (ARDC). JoAnne Denison exposed in her blog criminal action in the Court – her blog has been found to be akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater by the Illinois Supreme Court and the disciplinary commission!
We are in real trouble!
Ken Ditkowsky
|
Thank you Obama/AG Lynch–no more chemical restraints for the elderly/disabled
More health care fraud in the millions dispensed with:
And we are NOT running concentration camps, gulags or workhouses in the US. it’s time to empty the nursing homes and get the disabled and elderly back in their own homes, communities and with their own families. We need to get laws in place to do this.
Nursing homes are simply gulags, ghettos and slums for the elderly. It’s a nationwide scam. And the taxpayers pay for the abuse of the elderly and disableds.
|
The elderly and the disabled are (or should be grateful) to Attorney General Lynch for having the courage to send a message to the political and Judicial elite who are engaged in elder cleansing. The Seth Gillman, and Reinstein prosecutions are steps forward.
I’ve been exercising my First Amendment Rights crying out for an HONEST investigation and the prosecution of the predators. With little fanfare, and in the best traditions of American Justice Attorney General Holder and Attorney General Lynch have been quietly enforcing the Rule of Law.
There is much to do, and there are many miscreants out there receiving the protection of corrupt public officials, and it might be said that these events are akin to spitting into the ocean – BUT they are positive steps and encouragement to Tim, JoAnne, Sam, Bev, Janet, Gloria Sylvia, **** who have been tireless in the Quest to rein in the elder cleansers and overcome the ‘cover up’ orchestrated by Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371, 18 USCA 242, and 18 USCA 4 co-conspirators.
Doctor given prison for taking kickbacks to prescribe risky drugDr. Michael Reinstein, right, leaves the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse on March 11, 2016, after being sentenced to nine months in prison for accepting almost $600,000 in kickbacks to prescribe a risky antipsychotic drug to thousands of patients in Chicago nursing homes and mental health clinics.
(Phil Velasquez / Chicago Tribune) Jason Meisner Contact ReporterChicago Tribune
A Chicago doctor who was once the nation’s most prolific prescriber of the risky antipsychotic drug clozapine was sentenced to nine months in prison Friday for taking cash, vacation trips and other kickbacks from the drug’s manufacturers.
Dr. Michael Reinstein, the subject of a 2009 Tribune-ProPublica joint investigation, admitted to pocketing nearly $600,000 in benefits over the years for prescribing various forms of clozapine, known as a risky drug of last resort, to hundreds of mentally ill patients in his care.
In rejecting calls by defense lawyers for probation, U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman noted that like so many other doctors convicted of fraud schemes, Reinstein served a largely underprivileged group of people who are unable to fend for themselves.
The judge also said that regardless of whether he thought the drug was helping his patients, Reinstein violated the sacred doctor-patient trust by accepting the cash.
Promoted stories from Politics Chatter.comPhotos from the Chicago protest that shut down Trump rally
“That is the biggest danger here,” Coleman said. “It leaves a cloud over the patients and their families over whether they were put at some unnecessary risk. All of those questions are in their heads. … When money is inserted into the equation, there is no trust.”
When he pleaded guilty last year, Reinstein also settled a massive civil lawsuit brought by the U.S. attorney’s office alleging that he submitted more than 140,000 false Medicare and Medicaid claims as part of the kickback scheme. He was ordered to pay more than $3.7 million in penalties to the U.S. government and the state of Illinois.
In addition to the prison time, Coleman ordered Reinstein to forfeit an additional $592,000 and serve 120 hours of community service when he’s released from custody.
Reinstein, 72, of Skokie, showed no reaction to the sentence. Moments earlier, he had stood in the courtroom and apologized for his crime and the embarrassment it caused his family members, many of whom choked back tears in the courtroom gallery.
But as he had in the past, Reinstein defended his use of clozapine, which he said has been unfairly portrayed by prosecutors as dangerous.
“I’ve been working with this medicine since 1971,” said Reinstein, whose medical license was indefinitely suspended by state regulators in 2014. “It has helped many, many, many patients who were not helped by other drugs.”
First licensed in Illinois in 1968, Reinstein built a lucrative practice providing psychiatric care to mentally ill patients in nursing homes concentrated near his strip mall office in the city’s Uptown neighborhood.
The Tribune-ProPublica investigation found that Reinstein had amassed a worrisome record of assembly line care that was linked to three patients’ deaths and triggered lawsuits as well as accusations of fraud. But the federal charges did not include any accusations of patient deaths.
In his plea agreement, Reinstein admitted that, beginning in the 1990s, he prescribed the brand-name version of clozapine to hundreds of his patients while receiving $234,000 from the manufacturer. Reinstein admitted that the payments, ostensibly for speaking engagements touting the drug, were in part for prescribing the drug to so many patients.
When Ivax Pharmaceuticals began making a generic form of clozapine in 2003, Reinstein struck a $50,000-a-year consulting agreement with the company, quickly becoming among its largest prescribers in the country.
Over the next three years, Ivax provided other perks to Reinstein and his associates, including expensive meals, tickets to sporting events and an all-expense-paid trip to Ivax’s headquarters in Miami, where Reinstein went on fishing trips, a cruise and a golf outing, according to prosecutors.
Reinstein faced up to three years in prison but was given a break in his recommended sentence because he cooperated with prosecutors on several other health care fraud investigations, including secretly recording conversations with other doctors, court records show. It was not disclosed whether any of those investigations led to criminal charges.
In asking Coleman for a sentence of a year and half in prison, Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Pruitt said only 4 or 5 percent of all the patients nationwide who are on antipsychotic drugs are taking clozapine. Meanwhile, the “vast majority” of Reinstein’s patients were on the medication, Pruitt said.
“It is a staggering difference,” Pruitt said.
Twitter @jmetr22b
Ken Ditkowsky
|
22 worst laws in the US
22. Bingo games cannot last more than 5 hours (North Carolina)
ridiculous-us-laws-1
21. Chickens are not allowed to cross the road (Quitman, Georgia)
ridiculous-us-laws-2
20. If you cut down a cactus, you could be sentenced to 25 years in prison (Arizona)
ridiculous-us-laws-3
19. Policemen are allowed to bite a dog if they think it will calm the dog down (Paulding, Ohio)
ridiculous-us-laws-4
18. It’s illegal to sell your eyeballs (Texas)
ridiculous-us-laws-6
17. It’s against the law to sing off-key (North Carolina)
ridiculous-us-laws-7
16. You may not sell toothpaste and a toothbrush to the same customer on a Sunday (Rhode Island)
ridiculous-us-laws-8
15. You are not allowed to eat fried chicken any other way than using your hands (Gainesville, Georgia)
ridiculous-us-laws-9
14. Marriage between cousins is against the law only if they are younger than 65 (Utah)
ridiculous-us-laws-10
13. Red cars may not drive down Lake Street (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
ridiculous-us-laws-11
12. It’s forbidden for a female to appear unshaven in public (Carrizozo, New Mexico)
ridiculous-us-laws-12
11. Bear wrestling matches are prohibited (Alabama)
ridiculous-us-laws-13
10. You may not take a picture of a rabbit from January to April without an official permit (Wyoming)
ridiculous-us-laws-14
9 .You cannot buy meat of any kind on Sunday (Washington)
ridiculous-us-laws-15
8. It’s illegal to attend a public event or use public transport within 4 hours of eating an onions or garlic (Indiana)
ridiculous-us-laws-16
7. In San Antonio, flirting is against the law (Texas)
ridiculous-us-laws-17
6. It’s illegal for a man to give his fiancé a box of candy that weighs more than 50 lbs (22.5 kg) (Idaho)
ridiculous-us-laws-18
5. A motorist with criminal intentions must stop at the city limits and telephone the chief of police as he is entering the town (Washington)
ridiculous-us-laws-19
4. If you are found stealing soap, you must wash yourself until the bar of soap has been completely used up (Arizona)
ridiculous-us-laws-20
3. If you have mustaches, it’s illegal for you to kiss a woman (Eureka, Nevada)
ridiculous-us-laws-21
2. It’s against the law for a woman to drive a car in Main Street unless her husband is walking in front of the car waving a red flag (Waynesboro, Virginia)
ridiculous-us-laws-22
1. You can be arrested or fined for harassing Bigfoot (Washington)
ridiculous-us-laws-23
(laws via)
From Ken Ditkowsky–Protecting the First Amendment from Goons and Thugs
|
Apparently we are reaching the insane stage of the political season a bit early this time around. Historically, the partisans demonstrate their hypocrisy closer to election day, however, right out in the open are intelligent thinking people who discussing limiting the political speech of those that they disagree with. As an example, a ‘kid’ who had been a soldier opened his big mouth and proclaimed that he was going to middle east to fight for ISIS. He bought a ticket, traveled to Turkey where he was arrested and charged.
Where was the Civil Liberties Union? Where were all the liberals? Where were all the conservatives? Indeed, where were you and I? Uniformly, we are all outraged by “thought police” and limits on our freedom; but we all joined together in our outrage and contrary to the core values of America none of us (me included) uttered a word of protest. Uniformly we looked at the situation and said good riddance!
As a victim of a civil rights violation I should be more sensitive and understanding. I have and am yelling bloody murder as Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators have tried to stop me from demanding an HONEST investigation. Indeed, I and others are outraged that government officials were ravaging the core values and principles of America – our rights of free speech. Could I as an attorney and a citizen lose my right to practice law for advocating for Bernie Sanders? What if my favorite candidate was Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton? According to Jerome Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court I could indeed lose my license. I wrote to the Attorney General of the United States and was asked if I was repentant! When I stated that I was not and would do it again I got a four year suspension of my law license! JoAnne Denison wrote a blog – she got an interim suspension and three years. Lanre Amu, lost his license for practicing law while black.
Getting back to the point. The SCOTUS has made it abundantly clear that all political and content related speech is protected by the First Amendment. Thus, an American supporting ISIS, the National Socialists, the Democrats, the Republicans etc. is protected. The distinction between speech and action unfortunately is blurred. Some of the blurring is intentional and therefore if the blurring is done by government we as citizens must view it with suspicion.
The travel to the Mideast to join ISIS is a special case as ISIS has made a uniform threat to America and its existence and has committed overt acts in pursuance thereof. The action is thus reconciled as treason or its equivalent. BUT THIS BEGS THE QUESTION! Is it treason to support Bernie Sanders. He is an admitted socialist! Is it treason to support Donald Trump? He is overtly politically incorrect. Contrary to some of the partisans the answer is still no – it is not treason to support candidates that the mainstream media does not support. Then – why is it treason to support ISIS?
The answer is – pursuant to Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution and the First Amendment it is not. However, when that support crosses the line it may be an expatriating act. Voting in a foreign election, taking up arms in causes that are against the interests of the United States of America, intentional renunciation of citizenship, or doing acts that are overtly contrary to the Laws, customs, and serious interests of the United States of America (Treason). Thus, when this young man actually donned the mantel of ISIS he committed an expatriating act and became an enemy combatant! As such he forfeited the protections of America and our core values .
The foregoing is not a rationalization, but, part of America law from day one. Citizenship comes with responsibility and duties. Both Mr. Larkin and myself took the same oath to defend the Constitution. Thus, both of us had the responsibility to speak out in outrage when Justice Connors on page 90 and following of her evidence deposition admitted that she was ‘wired!’ (i.e. she was predetermined to find Mary Sykes incompetent and predetermined to appoint a particular guardian for her) [1]
I point this all out as the elder cleansing scandal is so voracious and public officials and corrupt judicial officials have expended so much effort to destroy America’s core values. Worse yet, we are buying into the problem and not standing up and being counted. If we allow the civil rights of one citizen to be compromised we guaranty that all our rights are in jeopardy. Our National motto has always been – I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death to protect your right to say it! It is also for this reason every day I donate a few minutes of my time to write these e-mails urging an HONEST investigation. I am not ‘cowed’ by Larkin’s intimidation and criminal behavior! I am disappointed that he has been able to get away with his criminality (and felonies) for so long. In a perfect world, Larkin and each of his co-conspirators would be in an orange federal issue jumpsuit rather than his usual shark skinned garb. ( There is no place in public life for predators or their apologists – see 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 4)
[1] On page 90 and following Judge Connors points out that had she known that she did not have jurisdiction she would have stopped the proceedings, corrected the deficiency and then reached the same result. The further perfidy exposed by this evidence deposition was the fact that Connors admitted not only that she was ‘wired’ (fixed) but she did not do her job. With this deposition of record, Connors was elevated to the Appellate Court of Illinois. It is no wonder that Larkin and his ilk are so ready to abandon their responsibilities, misrepresent the decisions of the SCOTUS and thumb their noses at their legal and ethical responsibilities.
Ken Ditkowsky
From: GOPUSA Weekend Update <eagle@gopusamedia.com> |
How to make a profit from the Homeless and abuse them
Some articles of interest:
From Ken Ditkowsky
|
Lower Wacker Drive was a haven for the homeless, especially during the winter months. The underground area offered some relative warmth, and the doorways to the skyscrapers shelter. Dozens congregated. Many were elderly and most had mental problems. It was an embarrassment to the City, except when votes needed to be cast –
The large nursing home operators always were on the lookout for the easy score. Not all the elderly are monied. In fact most live on quite modest budgets and particularly in Chicago the rule, rather than the exception is the strong family tie – and the development of some clout.
The largest group of nursing home moguls are reported to be orthodox jews. With the advent of Medicaid and Medicare the administrators at Blue Cross/Blue Shield became dominant. This meant that if you followed the formula you could maximize the amount of remuneration received. Hospitals became profit centers, but, their compensation was limited by not only the dogooders, naive medical personnel, but oversight; however, the nursing home business and the hospice facility offered virtually unlimited profits. All you had to do was to fill your beds and money rolled in hand over fist.
One of the largest operators is an individual who claims the title Rabbi. He purchased and built nursing homes by the score. Each nursing home was a configuration of Enron style corporations designed to maximize profit and reduce risk. Like hospitals the nursing home had luxury single rooms, single rooms, doubles, triples and a series of wards. An average facility had 350 beds and/or residences. The average cost of a non-warehouse patient was between $1,000 to $2500.00 a month; however, depending on insurance coverage (and elder savings) $5000.00 to $16,000.00 a month plus pharmaceuticals, and incidentals.
The competition for patients is fierce for obvious reasons. Most ethical physicians know which facilities are criminal enterprises and which are not and steer the patients to other options and especially home care. After my prostrate surgery (cancer) I went home. An extended care facility was not an option.
Thus, as so much money is available, there is a competition for patients. Thus, kickbacks are not uncommon, and arrangements are made with Court appointed guardians and unethical lawyers to share the wealth.
The nursing home mogul has to find a way to keep his facilities full. He thus hired a gang of hoodlums to roam the lower Wacker Drive area and scope out homeless people who could become more or less permanent residents. The targeted seniors would be drugged and beaten – and taken to an emergency room for treatment. The co-operating physician would certify that homeless person as incompetent and a call would go to the public guardian. The Public guardian (an attorney) would ram an incompetency finding through a corrupt Court and obtain an order to place the homeless person in a sheltered care facility. (The guardian was necessary to arrange for public aid, medicaid, medicare, etc.)
The attorneys in the public guardian’s office at the focus time were supervised by Attorney ******. Ms ******* just happened to be a relative of of a major mogul. The public guardian and his attorneys are well paid individuals = their payment comes from the State. They receive kickbacks and other remuneration from the nursing home moguls.
Once in the facility the victim was kept doped up, assigned a bed in a ward, and warehoused. It was not unusual that a feeding tube was inserted so that contacts with life for the victim was minimized. The victim was kept alive so that maximum benefits could be obtained. If you read the patient’s chart you would think that round the clock quality nursing care was being afforded – in fact zombies had a more exciting life. Government paid the freight!
When the patient’s life was squeezed out of him, he went into hospice. Hospice continued as long as possible – death was a minor inconvenience. (As Atty Gillman will tell you, GIP or general in patient care garners $170 per day, hospice at least $780 so everyone must need hospice) When hospice could no longer be claimed, cremation occurred and another homeless captive was recruited.
I was told that the practice has been curtailed because of ‘heat!’ Several of the moguls are reported to have sold their facilities in Chicago.
I hope that this explains how this part of the business works!
Ken Ditkowsky
|
2015 — Corruption in Chicago Report, a banner year
This is a yearly report put out by the Univ. of Illinois
The year 2015 was a banner year for corruption in the State of Illinois, the third most corrupt state in the nation. Based on the evidence in this report, it appears that our elected officials, our state and local governments, and society as a whole, are losing the battle against corruption. The most salacious corruption case of the past year is rooted in Downstate Illinois. Dennis Hastert, former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and former Congressman from the town of Plano, some 50 miles west of Chicago. Hastert was indicted by federal prosecutors in May for structuring the withdrawal of $1.7 million dollars in violation of bank laws and for lying to the FBI. According to news reports, Hastert gave the money to a former student of Yorkville High School to compensate him for concealing Hastert’s alleged misconduct decades ago when Hastert was a teacher and coach at the school. Hastert was convicted in October when he pleaded guilty to a felony count of evading bank reporting laws in a hushmoney scheme. He is now awaiting sentencing. While the Hastert indictment and conviction garnered national news headlines and was the most significant corruption story of the year, Illinois experienced many additional corruption events in 2015. In this report, we document 27 convictions, 28 indictments, and the launching of 11 corruption investigation. In addition we cover the sentencing of 30 public corruption convicts last year, most of whom were convicted in a year or two before 2015.
FROM THE MEDICAL SECTION OF THE REPORT:
Medical fraud in Illinois Medical fraud is a white-collar crime that involves dishonest filling of medical claims or providing and billing for unnecessary medical treatments. This often affects elderly or disabled individuals who are recipients of federal or state medical benefits. Medical fraud schemes not only rip off the system, but also take advantage of vulnerable individuals and pose risks to their health. In 2015, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, which is part of the Health Care Fraud & Prevention Team, a joint initiative between the U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, carried out one of the largest corruption investigations in its history. The operation took place in 17 districts throughout the United States, resulting in charges against 243 individuals, including 46 doctors and other licensed medical professions, who allegedly participated in fraud schemes involving approximately $712 million in false billings. Since its inception in 2007, Strike Force operations in nine states have charged over 2,300 defendants who collectively have falsely billed the Medicare program for more than $7 billion. In 2015, a number of cases were prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney of Northern District of Illinois and twelve individuals were charged. In the Guerrero, et. al. case, seven individuals who worked at three home health care companies were charged with $45 million fraud between 2008 and 2014. The fraud as alleged included paying illegal bribes and kickbacks to obtain Medicare beneficiaries; ignoring doctors who refused to certify beneficiaries as “homebound” and eligible for care; enrolling patients who did not need or want the care; subjecting patients to pre-planned cycles of discharges and re-enrollments, regardless of their medical needs; and falsifying medical records to make patients appear to be homebound or sicker than they actually were. Three other cases involved medical professionals also charged with health care fraud. In one, Zenaida Dimalig of Bensenville allegedly paid cash kickbacks to Medicare-covered patients, who, in turn, allowed their Medicare information to be used to bill Medicare for homehealth services that these individuals did not need. Dimalig then passed on this Medicare information and records that falsely suggested that certain services were provided to Medicare beneficiaries to home health care agencies for the purpose of billing Medicare. In another case Barry Fisher of River Forest, is alleged to have falsely certified patients as “confined to the home,” requiring skilled nursing services, and falsification of information in patient medical records. 13 In the third case, a Chicago dermatologist, Omeed Memar was indicted for health care fraud for allegedly billing cosmetic treatments fraudulently as the destruction of large numbers of pre-cancerous lesions. For a period of approximately six years between 2007 and 2013, Memar allegedly falsely diagnosed patients with actinic keratosis, ordered his staff to provide intense-pulsed light treatments for his patients, and instructed his staff to document the procedures falsely as the destruction of 15 or more precancerous lesions. Other cases include: a $6 million Medicare fraud and kickback scheme at a Chicago home health care practice; kickbacks by a Chicago psychiatrist for prescribing anti-psychotic drugs; Medicare fraud by a psychologist and psychotherapy services; false billing of Medicare by a suspended physician; health-care fraud by the owner of two nursing agencies that provided unnecessary services to Medicare beneficiaries; a Medicare kickback conspiracy by owner and executives at closed Sacred Heart Hospital; a $ 23 million Medicare fraud conspiracy by leader of two health clinics ; the falsification of Medicaid Waiver Program bills by a personal assistant in the Home Services Program; a $10.8 million fraud scheme by a Wheeling Chiropractic Group; and a $2.5 million health care fraud by the owner and operator of health clinics located in Park Ridge and Skokie, Illinois. The prevalence of such a large number of medical fraud cases is evidence that corrupt acts are not confined to elected officials but can be found in the various professions, the business class and among average working men and women.
From Ken Ditkowsky–repeats we need honest investigations of Wyman, Gore, Sykes, Tyler…
—–Original Message—–
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Mar 11, 2016 6:32 AM
To: JoAnne M Denison <joanne@justice4every1.com>………………..
Subject: Re: REQUEST FOR HONEST INVESTIGATION OF MORE SERIOUS CHARGES. (pursuant to 18 USCA 4)What is most disturbing about the kidnapping of the homeless people by one or more of the nursing home moguls so as to warehouse them at health care expense is the fact that last night after midnight I remembered that I had been told about this scenario before (including the involvement of the Illinois public guardian’s office) and dismissed it as tooooooo bizarre. It was in my mind in the same category as Aliens in New Mexico. I do not know if my giving it more credibility would have saved some lives – but, *****.Unfortunately, I know that ME actually did hire thugs – these same thugs beat up a client of mine. I sued ME on behalf of the client and he paid a substantial settlement. Thus, with MS orchestrating the gold mining expedition in Alice Gore’s teeth and the fact that Gore’s family did not find out about her death for an extended time after her death the pattern is not only confirmed but cemented by an admission that ME made to the Coopers. He actually bragged to them that he did the terrible things ‘because he could!’NOw lets add up the score. Why and What is Jerome Larkin so frightened of by an HONEST INVESTIGATION? Why the hue and cry raised against you when you exposed some of the antics of the public guardian’s office? Did certain of the favored corrupt attorneys harbored in the Sykes case have ties to the public guardian’s office? Why was Larkin’s 18 USCA 371 group so upset by my writing to the Attorney General of the United States? Why was your blog equated to yelling fire in a crowded theater? Why are state mandated ethics statements not filed by Larkin?Even with a mountain of evidence of fraud presented Larkin, he doggedly continues his cover=upwhen he could join the chorus of angels by the simple act of calling up the States Attorney to look into the averments of Gloria Sykes, Beverly Cooper, John Wyman, the two Mary’s etc. All he had to do was make a gesture! Yet, he and the IARDC doubled down on the cover-up with their prosecution of both you and me. The misrepresentation of the Alvarez case coupled with the equating the disclosure of judicial corruption with yelling fire in a theater was very telling and an admission of Larkin’s overt conspiratorial acts promulgating the elder cleansing crimes of elder abuse, isolation, exploitation, kidnapping and homicide!Yes – please publish this information! Let’s get these averments out there and let’s make it harder for the dishonest nursing home moguls to kidnap their clientele! Let’s start taking the profit out of elder cleansing! Most importantly – let’s put some pressure on the Illinois Department of Revenue to collect the joint and several taxes, interest and penalties that Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators owe on the Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security/Hospice frauds.(NB. We now know why the delay in the IARDC taking Mr. Gillman’s law license!)Ken Ditkowsky
From: JoAnne M Denison <jdenison@surfree.com>
To: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: REQUEST FOR HONEST INVESTIGATION OF MORE SERIOUS CHARGES.
ok to publish?—–Original Message—–
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Mar 10, 2016 8:11 PM
To: Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , Atty Diane Saltoun IAG Illinois Atty General , Edward Carter , PA Governor’s Office , Attorney General Pam Bondi , Robert Grundstein
Cc: Tim NASGA , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Bev Cooper , Janet Phelan , Nasga Us , “newseditors@wsj.com” , Matt Senator Kirk
Subject: REQUEST FOR HONEST INVESTIGATION OF MORE SERIOUS CHARGES.To: Justice Department and Illinois Attorney GeneralFrom: Kenneth DitkowskyDate: March 10, 2016Subject: Kidnapping of the homeless and incarceration of the same in nursing homesDuring my most recent and continued investigation of the elder cleansing scandal I interviewed a former member of the cabal that manages and operates some of the most disreputable nursing homes both here in Chicago and in the ‘several’ States. This former operator is co-operating with Law enforcement and making an effort to not only make restitution for his former misdeed, but to rectify the injury that he engaged in promulgating.During the course of the interview, he pointed out that a prominent member of the cabal employed thugs on a regular basis. These thugs were used for special programs, including but not limited to canvas the homeless camps. At these camps (and especially those on lower Lake Street) the thugs would grab elderly homeless, render them helpless and take them to co-operating hospital emergency rooms. Therein compromised doctors would certify the victims as incompetent and the office of the public guardian would generate through corrupt jurists, guardian ad litem, and other corrupt public officials guardianships for profit.The guardians appointed (usually employees or agents of the Office of Public Guardian) would see to the incarceration of these human flotsam in the nursing homes and hospice facilities of this prominent nursing home operator. The usual commission schedule was applicable for the jurist, the Guardian ad litem etc. I could not ascertain if the commissions were on the table or off the table. From the tenor of the conversation the payments were clandestine.In the nursing home facilities the human flotsam were kept drugged, on minimum rations, and kept alive in the same manner as barn yard animals. Medicare and Medicaid were billed for the room and board of the victims as was the services of the 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators. When the victim’s incarceration ran its course, or the patient died hospice payments were billed and sought by the ‘treating’ facility. With the co-operation of public officials, corrupt doctors, and corrupt judicial officials profits were maximized.I was further informed that the hue and cry that is being raised by Ms. Denison and her blog – MaryGSykes, the blog Probate Sharks, and yours truly the prominent nursing home operator was forced to sell his operation and abandon the sweeps of the homeless haunts. Apparently, our efforts have also thwarted similar operations in South Florida.My ego directs me to believe this information as it is consistent with certain other facts that I have previously forwarded and most important consistent with the fact that when I requested an HONEST investigation Mr. Schmiedel, Mr. Stern, and Ms. Farenga jumped the gun and filed a Rule 137 Motion seeking sanctions to be imposed upon me for making the required inquiries concerning the Mary Sykes case, 09 P 4585 and when the Appellate Court of Illinois reversed the obviously illegal sanction order that they were able to obtain, Farenga by a letter (previously furnished) was able to induce disciplinary proceedings against Ms. Denison and myself. Our crime was requesting an HONEST INVESTIGATION and the independent publication thereof by the blog Probate Sharks. As the First Amendment specifically protects such communications the conclusion and the tie in is obvious. NB. This request is also protected by the SLapp statutes, 320 ILCS 20/4, 18 USCA 4, Rule 8.3, 18 USCA 241 and 18 USCA 242, Americans with Disabilities , 47 USCA 230 ***** and a number of recent SCOTUS decisions ignored by the Illinois Supreme Court and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.The foregoing notwithstanding, I would like to join all others who have made similar averments in respectfully requesting an HONEST and comprehensive investigation into this human trafficking and possible tax evasion, Medicare, and other frauds and conspiracies.[1]
[1] Jerome Larkin, the administrator of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission has not filed the required financial disclosure statements, and is believed to be intimately involved in the elder cleansing frauds based upon his bogus ethics prosecutions, his misrepresentation of the Alvarez decision by the SCOTUS and his outrageous statement that the MaryGSykes blogs’ exposure of judicial corruption is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. His actions in these lawyer disciplinary actions against only the lawyers who object is in derogation of Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4. His failure to protect the public from a judge who appears to admit that she was wired (see Page 90 and following) of her evidence deposition, and serious criminal action – such as harvesting gold from the mouths of victim Alice Gore – are all admissions against interest.nB. I know of *****’s use of thugs. One of my first cases involving Mr. **** involved his hiring a thug to beat up a client of mine who refused to attorn to Mr. ***’s wishes. The Orthodox Jewish Community in Chicago was upset by Mr. ***’s actions and referred him to me to address the problem. I had a visit from one of the thugs. Because of my size and demeanor the thug decided that he was not interested in mixing it up with me. When I rose from behind my desk, and he took a look at the way I was carrying myself he ran out of the office. The next day Mr. **** made a generous cash settlement of my client’s claim. Mr. ***** has not forgiven and forgotten! (Or at least he has made certain that I was aware of his position)Ken DitkowskyJoAnne Denison, Executive Director Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714 Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights Email me at JoAnne@Denisonlaw.com Cell Phone 773-255-7608 Work Ph 312-553-1300 or 847-600-3421 efax 312-376-8842 See our website at www.justice4every1.com Please note that this message may contain confidential or attorney client communications. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and destroy all emails you have received in both your inbox and trash or other folders which may contain same. Thank you.
JoAnne Denison, Executive Director Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714 Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights Email me at JoAnne@Denisonlaw.com Cell Phone 773-255-7608 Work Ph 312-553-1300 or 847-600-3421 efax 312-376-8842 See our website at www.justice4every1.com
From Ken Ditkowsky–why don’t they investigate the Faskowicz murder?
To: Attorney General Pam Bondi <agnews@myfloridalegal.com>; Governor Rick Scott <rick.scott@eog.myflorida.
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:33 AM
Subject: Our Illinois miscreants invaded Florida Re: Miriam Solo/aka Greenfield.
hursday, March 10, 2016
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Editor’s note: Obviously, the State of Florida is mandated to perform “due diligence” in locating heirs especially when their appellant court found a conflict and withheld half of Irving’s substantial estate. Why wasn’t this legal action taken? Why didn’t Florida take criminal action? At least one of Irving’s brothers was a WWII veteran and tracing him would not be too difficult. Barzilia…so…so many questions…unanswered. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.comEditor’s note: If one reads the obit of Marjorie G. Ivy’s sister, one realizes that there is a huge extended Ivy Family residing in Indiana. From the many swirls in the Shark Pool, we know that lots of Ivy’s are presently reading this blog.If, in essence, Mordy’s siblings owe Mordy a large sum of money, it is apparent that there are laws governing victim’s and victim’s families’ rights to be monetarily reimbursed. Mordy may be a solvent individual. Your ProbateShark suggests that the Ivys or the Ivy’s attorneys contact the Illinois States’ Attorneys office to explore these possibilities. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.comBarzilai, Why didn’t Miriam Solo and her siblings advise the Florida Probate Court that they had a brother, Mordecai Faskowitz?Barzilai, Why didn’t Miriam stop at Zach Fardon’s office and confess while she was at the Federal Building Tuesday? Hundreds of ProbateSharks.com viewers are watching and wondering. LVP.S. Your ProbateShark was just informed that Miriam was ordered to be in Federal Court Thursday A.M….so she could easily run upstairs to Zach’s office and cleanse her soul…What boggles this fish brain is that even though we know the “authorities” read this blog and it is self evident that Miriam excluded her disabled brother, Mordecai Faskowitz from his inheritance, nothing is being done to punish her. Why? Why is she being protected? Could it be that Miriam has connections to high offices? Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.comBarzilai’s clipping.
Barzilai, Has Miriam confessed and repented?Barzilai, a response to “Assault victim fears elderly woman’s murder could have been prevented” Read more: http://wgntv.com/2013/10/14/assault-victim-fears-elderly-womans-murder-could-have-been-prevented/#ixzz2hhKezcyw Barzilai, a response to “Assault victim fears elderly woman’s urder could have been prevented” BarzilaiAssault victim fears elderly woman’s murder could have been prevented You write“To the best of Your ProbateShark’s knowledge the real decedents of Irving, his two brothers, David and Harry or their decendents were never advised using due diligence by the State of Florida as being true heirs to Irving’s Estate. In essence, total strangers with the same last name recovered the life achievements of Irving Fisk Faskowitz and the fifth unrelated sibling, Mordechai Faskowitz was excluded.”So what is it, exactly, that bothers you? That they are thieves, or that they didn’t share their ill gotten gains with their disabled brother?Are David and Harry decedents of Irving? I’m not sure what that means. Decedent means “one who is dead.” Are they the dead ones of Irving? Or maybe you mean descendants. But are brothers descendants? I thought children or legal wards were desecendants?Oh, my mistake. I thought you were a serious and rational independent investigator, but now I realize that you’re just letting off steam for a perceived injustice. It’s an emotional thing, and nothing has to really make sense. Sorry to bother you.Dear Barzilai,Thank you so much for your most helpful comments on the ProbateSharks.com blog. We appreciate all constructive comments to the blog. This Shark apologizes for errors as his fish brain is limited. This Shark has corrected 2 incorrect words in the posting i.e. decedents changed to descendants and Harry Faskowitz to Samuel Faskowitz. Your ProbateShark checked the genealogy that ProbateSharks.com commissioned after witnessing the incongruities of the genealogy prepared by the Faskowitz-Solo Clan for the court in Sebring, Florida. This genealogy along with the complete Irving Fisk Faskowitz file is being limited to law enforcement personnel only.Barzilai, what bothers this Shark is that one of the Faskowitz siblings is the same person who defrauded Alice R. Gore, a 99 year old disabled ward of the Probate Court of Cook County, removed her gold teeth, her fortune, her liberty and placed an unnecessary gastric tube into her stomach thus depriving her of one of her favorite senses, her taste of food. Yes, if these are the acts of thieves and people who would rob their own brother of any gains…legal or ill begotten…if the shoe fits…so be it.Your ProbateShark has big shoulders and accepts your criticism as he is a fish and not a professional investigator. As a sister and legal guardian of Mordy much more would be expected, but alas this was not forthcoming and the results to Marjorie Gayle Ivy were horrendous, deadly, and fatal.Barzilai, I have not corrected your errors in the word descendants in your original comment which you misspelled.From the Shark Pool, Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com Posted by Probate Shark at 12:36 PM![]()
Nursing home report card–where does yours rank?
|
Pa. nursing homes are only the 9th worst because the political corruption in Pa. still pales by comparison to Illinois, Florida, ******. In Illinois we have Jerome Larkin! This amoral public official not only has the temerity to openly and notoriously misrepresent the Rule of Law as stated by the SCOTUS in Alvarez, but, has lied about the record in Sykes, Gore *** and had the temerity to characterize complaints concerning corruption of judges as akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.*
The infamous corruption is affirmed by the Illinois Supreme Court – a body of elected Judges!
You have to visit one of the less public sections of an Illinois or a Florida nursing home run by the cabal that Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators are protecting by their assaults on the First Amendment Rights of lawyers screaming for an HONEST INVESTIGATION. A visit to the crematories of the 3rd Reich is a equivalent!
As if the Alice Gore case (the prospecting for gold in a senior mouth – and the removal of the gold from her teeth) is not bad enough, but, these “wonderful” politically recognized civic minded individuals who are so beloved by the political and judicial machinery supplement their income by trolling the haunts of the homeless. Therein, they literally kidnap the homeless, drug them and take them to hospital emergency rooms where they are subsequently released by such entities as the public guardian to pay for play nursing homes. Once in these nursing homes medicare and medicaid kick in and whatever money that is loose is garnered. A single “rich” senior being elder cleansed may yield 10 to 15 thousand dollars a month in pure profit. A couple of homeless people only a couple of thousand a month each – but, these people never bring in a JD, KD, JN, ****. four or five to a room *****.
In Illinois I understand this practice was stopped when a whistle blower denounced it and noisy law enforcement people started to get too close; however, my source suggests that the same is still going on in Florida, California etc.
In the cesspool of health care fraud no stone is left unturned to garner political and financial gain. No one is safe!
Ken Ditkowsky
* note, in Illinois, a corruption blog is only akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater, but you have to yell “police” or “fbi” and the theater has to be filled with Illinois corrupt politicians and judges, and of course lawyers from the ARDC.
From: Cynthia Stephens <cynthiastphns1@aol.com> I am shocked that Pennsylvania is not in the top 5 of the worst! Look at how innocent and unsuspecting people are treated in the courts for money. Innocent people dragged into court rooms for fraudulent and criminal wealth and property re-distribution because someone who doesn’t like them who has “high and mighty friends,” (some attorneys and possibly others) in the courts and some judges, or former judges and they can do whatever they want to whomever they want!
|
Continuing series–how to steal a retirement by Guardians
The Perils of Probate Court in Retirement
Image: The Perils of Probate Court in Retirement (Dollar Photo Club)
By Juliette Fairley | Thursday, 10 Mar 2016 07:32 AM
Short URL| Email Article| Comment| Contact| Print| A A
0
inShare
After discovering that his philanthropist grandmother Brooke Astor was medically neglected, isolated from friends and living in squalor in a Manhattan Park Avenue duplex, Professor Philip Marshall was successful in replacing his father as power of attorney with a guardian who was a family friend.
“I petitioned the court for guardianship to save my grandmother and suggested Annette de la Renta,” said Marshall, a professor at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island.
As a result of her grandson’s efforts, Mrs. Astor was relocated to her 75-acre estate in Briarcliff Manor, New York while her son Anthony Marshall, who had reportedly failed to fill his mother’s prescription medication, was sentenced to prison for stealing from the Astor estate.
“I am now advocating for supported decision making over guardianship,” Marshall told Newsmax Finance.
Although there was a happy ending for Mrs. Astor, many family members nationwide don’t have the resources to withstand the perils of probate court.
“Concerned family members involved in litigation are often accused of being drug addicts or mentally ill by the attorneys of the court appointed guardians that use those kinds of tactics,” said Michael Larsen, author of Guardianship: How Judges & Lawyers Steal Your Money (Germain Publishing, February 3, 2016).
For example, Charlie Pascal was sued for defamation by his mother in law’s court appointed guardian.
“I’m legally blind so I represented myself using the Americans with Disabilities Act,” Pascal told Newsmax.
After Marcy DuDeck, Pascal’s relative, was placed under guardianship in Las Vegas in 2007 by Clark County Family Court Commissioner Jon Norheim, Pascal and his wife Heidi were banned from visiting the 93 year old.
“We also got calls from Morgan Stanley that the guardian was withdrawing large amounts of money from Marcy’s $1.2 million dollar trust,” said Pascal who began lobbying to reform Nevada state guardianship laws.
Under a court ordered guardianship, the elderly lose their individual and Constitutional rights around residence, medical care, assets and property and the consequences can be detrimental for families financially and the older relative’s health.
Latest News Update
Get Newsmax TV At Home »
Special: Blake Shelton Finally Confesses How He Dropped All of the Weight
Some 90% of families who responded to a national survey commissioned in 2015 by the Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship (AAAPG) reported that the judge in their case was not acting in the best interest of the incapacitated person, 80% suspected the judge was improperly influenced and 70% felt that, once placed, the retirement home did not act in the best interests of the elderly person.
An abusive or questionable guardianship does not have to be the end of the road. Other than filing an appeal, petitioning the court as an interested party is one way to hold an abusive or neglectful guardian accountable.
“Courts have limited authority to act so litigants need to tailor their relief to something the court can consider and order,” said Don Ford, a partner attorney at the boutique law firm Ford + Bergner LLP, which litigates guardianship cases across the state of Texas.
That’s why national advocates oppose the fact that guardianship structures are imposed on an elderly individual at all.
“The fundamental problem that all abusive guardianships share in common are rampant greed, disrespect for the value of older people and families, no regard for the law and the absence of any meaningful consequence for guardianship stakeholders,” said Dr. Sam Sugar, founder of AAAPG in Aventura, Florida.
Although progress is slow, raising awareness is making a difference.
In December 2015, the Nevada Supreme Court Guardianship Commission unanimously voted to send a letter to all sheriffs and district attorneys in the state, as well as the Attorney General, requesting that they prosecute misconduct and seek restitution for people subject to unjust guardianships. Two other laws passed include one that allows out of state relatives to be named guardians and another that requires guardians to be state certified before they can practice.
“We are now lobbying for stronger laws, which will require guardians to return to victims what they have taken,” said Pascal.
Juliette Fairley is an author, lecturer and TV host based in New York. To read more of her work, Click Here Now.
© 2016 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.
Read more: The Perils of Probate Court in Retirement
Important: Can you afford to Retire?
From Atty Angela Drees–fighting for justice in Alabama
This is an incredible story of one woman’s fight for truth and justice after she has lost everything–her children, her money and her career.
Incidences of wrongful discipline by bar associations are growing when court corruption is unfettered.
Please pray for her and her children.
First Amendment Retaliation for running this blog
Dear Readers;
An old friend wrote me lately and asked which statutes were violated in my disciplinary case and I responded as follows (and I want to thank S for the question).
Feel free to use these in your pleadings where you speak out for a loved one, but you are falsely arrested on bogus charges.
You are told to “shut up” in probate or divorce court.
You are told “we don’t do things that way down here” (referring to no due process, no notice, no summons or complaint, no time for discovery and no hearing)
You are told to get your comments off of social media and don’t make any comments on this (corrupt) case.
Dear S;
You asked a good question about why an honest lawyer is being disciplined, and what laws and statutes protect a lawyer who is whistleblower. You may wish to review these statutes and cases:
Whistleblower Lawyers
First and foremost, all lawyers are supposed to be whistleblowers on other lawyers and on the judges who are also lawyers. There is no exception and lawyers are not supposed to create a “code of silence” for corruption or look the other way when it is occuring.
Under the Himmel case, an attorney is required to report instances of attorney misconduct to the ARDC and the appropriate authorities.
All my blog did was post information on the Mary G Sykes case.
Mary G Sykes Probate case 09 P 4585 Case Synopsis:
Mary G Sykes noted one day that $4,000 was missing from her bank account. The banker told her that Carolyn Toerpe took the money under a POA and that she should file for a Protective Order. Mary went downtown to file for a Protective Order. Carolyn received the Petition, hired a crooked lawyer (Harvey Waller–denounced in Indiana by the Atty General there for fleecing the elderly in a Reverse Mortgage business) and he responded with a Petition for Guardianship.
The US Constitution requires due process or a judgement is void ab initio (from the beginning). You do not have to file anything or say anything, you can reopen the case at any time and get it dismissed. Juridiction requires notice, time to prepare, discovery and a hearing. If any of those are absent, any court order is void abinitio.
Carolyn took Mary to Naperville and would not let her come home. She used the Sheriffs at Cook County to do this.
The Guardianship was filed in Cook County and the sheriff went out on several summons and all were marked “person not served” (First Vol. of Sykes appeal, on my blog).
Mary was also entitled to a hearing. In a letter from GAL Stern to Harvey Waller it was a done deal that Mary would be deemed incapacitated and that Carolyn would become guardian.
A lawyer has a duty to report all of this to the authorities. I wrote letters to Lisa Madigan, Illinois state’s attorney, Anita Alvarez Cook County States attorney and Diane Saltoun, Illinois Inspector General whose job is to prevent fraud or theft from Illinois State Agencies. Mary would be drugged and put in a nursing home when she wanted to stay in her own home, per her power of attorney. Since the State of Illinois gives significant dollars to nursing home residents together with Medicare, that is fraud. It is wasted money. Tax payer dollars.
Each of Madigan, Alvarez and Saltoun wrote back and said it was not their job to go after court corruption and fraud (which is a lie).
I wrote letters (and so did Ken) to the attorneys general, the ARDC complaining of the criminal conduct and the danger Mary was in (“target, isolate, medicate, drain the estate, narcotize and eliminate, cremate), and they all dismissed the letters (In other cases lawyers were disciplined for filing Guardianships without jurisdiction and commandeering a ward’s money to pay their own bills–Sykes is similar–Seniors for Cash)
Ken was told he should be ashamed for writing to the authorities and quoting GAO reports (US govt agency reports), that there was serious fraud and corruption in guardianship. (these are cited elsewhere on this blog)
The statutes involved are:
321 USC sec 20/4 for immunity for report the physical and financial abuse of an elder.
(b) Any person, institution or agency participating in the making of a report, providing information or records related to a report, assessment, or services, or participating in the investigation of a report under this Act in good faith, or taking photographs or x-rays as a result of an authorized assessment, shall have immunity from any civil, criminal or other liability in any civil, criminal or other proceeding brought in consequence of making such report or assessment or on account of submitting or otherwise disclosing such photographs or x-rays to any agency designated to receive reports of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect. Any person, institution or agency authorized by the Department to provide assessment, intervention, or administrative services under this Act shall, in the good faith performance of those services, have immunity from any civil, criminal or other liability in any civil, criminal, or other proceeding brought as a consequence of the performance of those services. For the purposes of any civil, criminal, or other proceeding, the good faith of any person required to report, permitted to report, or participating in an investigation of a report of alleged or suspected abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, or self-neglect shall be presumed.
18 USC sec 4 for Misprison of felony.
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
All I did was blog about the case, I did not appear in the Sykes case:
47 USC sec 230 Internet Decency Act
(a) FindingsThe Congress finds the following:
(1) The rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens.
(2) These services offer users a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops.
(3) The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.
(4) The Internet and other interactive computer services have flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a minimum of government regulation.
(5) Increasingly Americans are relying on interactive media for a variety of political, educational, cultural, and entertainment services.
(b) Policy. It is the policy of the United States—
(1) to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services and other interactive media;
(2) to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State regulation;
(3) to encourage the development of technologies which maximize user control over what information is received by individuals, families, and schools who use the Internet and other interactive computer services;
(4) to remove disincentives for the development and utilization of blocking and filtering technologies that empower parents to restrict their children’s access to objectionable or inappropriate online material; and
(5) to ensure vigorous enforcement of Federal criminal laws to deter and punish trafficking in obscenity, stalking, and harassment by means of computer.
(c) Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material
(1) Treatment of publisher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
First Amendment, US Constitution
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Illinois Constitution
Article I, Sec. 4
SECTION 4. FREEDOM OF SPEECH
All persons may speak, write and publish freely, being
responsible for the abuse of that liberty. In trials for
libel, both civil and criminal, the truth, when published
with good motives and for justifiable ends, shall be a
sufficient defense.
(Source: Illinois Constitution.)
First Amendment retaliation claims are covered under:
1. 42 USC sec 1983. Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States
or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of
any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and
laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any
action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken
in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be
granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief
was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress
applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered
to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
and under
2) Deprivation of rights under color of law–conspiracy
18 USC Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights
-STATUTE-
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the
United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the
premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured –
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in
violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an
attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Also:
18 USC 371 conspiracy to defraud the US govt (Medicare fraud–forcing seniors into nursing homes and billing Medicare)
Sec. 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
STATUTE
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.
14th Amendment
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
More laws – ADA or Americans with Disabilities
42 USC § 12203 prohibiting retaliation for protecting an Elder under the ADA;
No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.
It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.
75 ILCS § 5/8-901 to 8-909 Illinois Reporter’s Privilege Act to protect bloggers, columnists and other news media:
|
(735 ILCS 5/8-901) (from Ch. 110, par. 8-901)
Sec. 8-901. Source of information. No court may compel any person to disclose the source of any information obtained by a reporter except as provided in Part 9 of Article VIII of this Act. (Source: P.A. 84-398.) |
(735 ILCS 5/8-902) (from Ch. 110, par. 8-902)Sec. 8-902. Definitions. As used in this Act: (a) “Reporter” means any person regularly engaged in the business of collecting, writing or editing news for publication through a news medium on a full-time or part-time basis; and includes any person who was a reporter at the time the information sought was procured or obtained. (b) “News medium” means any newspaper or other periodical issued at regular intervals whether in print or electronic format and having a general circulation; a news service whether in print or electronic format; a radio station; a television station; a television network; a community antenna television service; and any person or corporation engaged in the making of news reels or other motion picture news for public showing. (c) “Source” means the person or means from or through which the news or information was obtained. (Source: P.A. 92-335, eff. 8-10-01.) |
Illinois Citizens Participation Act (Anti SLAPP lawsuits or lawsuits designed to deny citizens their First Amendment rights)
735 ILSC sec 110-1/2
(735 ILCS 110/1)Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Citizen Participation Act. (Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.) |
(735 ILCS 110/5)Sec. 5. Public policy. Pursuant to the fundamental philosophy of the American constitutional form of government, it is declared to be the public policy of the State of Illinois that the constitutional rights of citizens and organizations to be involved and participate freely in the process of government must be encouraged and safeguarded with great diligence. The information, reports, opinions, claims, arguments, and other expressions provided by citizens are vital to effective law enforcement, the operation of government, the making of public policy and decisions, and the continuation of representative democracy. The laws, courts, and other agencies of this State must provide the utmost protection for the free exercise of these rights of petition, speech, association, and government participation. Civil actions for money damages have been filed against citizens and organizations of this State as a result of their valid exercise of their constitutional rights to petition, speak freely, associate freely, and otherwise participate in and communicate with government. There has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits termed “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” in government or “SLAPPs” as they are popularly called. The threat of SLAPPs significantly chills and diminishes citizen participation in government, voluntary public service, and the exercise of these important constitutional rights. This abuse of the judicial process can and has been used as a means of intimidating, harassing, or punishing citizens and organizations for involving themselves in public affairs. It is in the public interest and it is the purpose of this Act to strike a balance between the rights of persons to file lawsuits for injury and the constitutional rights of persons to petition, speak freely, associate freely, and otherwise participate in government; to protect and encourage public participation in government to the maximum extent permitted by law; to establish an efficient process for identification and adjudication of SLAPPs; and to provide for attorney’s fees and costs to prevailing movants. (Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.) |
(735 ILCS 110/15) Sec. 15. Applicability. This Act applies to any motion to dispose of a claim in a judicial proceeding on the grounds that the claim is based on, relates to, or is in response to any act or acts of the moving party in furtherance of the moving party’s rights of petition, speech, association, or to otherwise participate in government. Acts in furtherance of the constitutional rights to petition, speech, association, and participation in government are immune from liability, regardless of intent or purpose, except when not genuinely aimed at procuring favorable government action, result, or outcome. (Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.) |
(735 ILCS 110/20) Sec. 20. Motion procedure and standards. (a) On the filing of any motion as described in Section 15, a hearing and decision on the motion must occur within 90 days after notice of the motion is given to the respondent. An appellate court shall expedite any appeal or other writ, whether interlocutory or not, from a trial court order denying that motion or from a trial court’s failure to rule on that motion within 90 days after that trial court order or failure to rule. (b) Discovery shall be suspended pending a decision on the motion. However, discovery may be taken, upon leave of court for good cause shown, on the issue of whether the movants acts are not immunized from, or are not in furtherance of acts immunized from, liability by this Act. (c) The court shall grant the motion and dismiss the judicial claim unless the court finds that the responding party has produced clear and convincing evidence that the acts of the moving party are not immunized from, or are not in furtherance of acts immunized from, liability by this Act. (Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.) |
Cases to read–US Supreme Court: 1) Citizens United (FEC prohibited any movies from coming out 60 days before an election. Citizens United made trashy “Hillary” movie which even the US Supremes said was repugnant. The Court ruled that free speech is subject to “strict scrutiny” and the US govt cannot tell anyone when to speak, what to speak or to refrain from speaking.
“strict scrutiny” means the govt must have a compelling interest, the ends must justify the means, the least restrictive guidelines must be imposed, and the law must actually work to prevent harm. Strict scrutiny means the govt will never win. The FEC rule was struck down as being unconstitutional facially under the First Amendment
None of that is present in my case. I am a blogger about corruption. People report it to me, I write to the authorities, pursuant to my duties as a lawyer and civilian, and I publish the example so others know how to do this. The govt cannot and must not regulate the media. Since this is all under 320 ILCS 20/4, my good faith is presumed.
2) False Speech. Alvarez. In Alvarez, a man went around with a fake Medal of Valor to entice the ladies to sleep with him. He also gave speeches on heroism at local VFW’s and got free meals. Congress had passed a law saying no one could say they had a Medal of Valor when in fact they did not. The US Supreme Court said that Mr Alvarez’s right to lie about his fake Medal of Valor was covered under free speech.
Federal Appellate case:
Rosemont v. Markham. Mr. Rosemont was a popular therapist with a masters degree in Psychology. He was a licensed therapist in NC but not Kentucky. One day a Kentucky therapist reported his blog and column to the disciplinary authorities for practicing psychology without a license in Kentucky because he wrote a column giving some Kentucky parents some general advice in dealing with a lazy teen son. The Kentucky Federal Dist court ruled that the state government had no jurisdiction to regulate a professional column/blog/media under the first amendment.
Illinois Appellate case:
In re Weddigen: Mr. Weddigen was unhappy with the judge in his divorce. He went on fb and told everyone how the judge was wrong and how to record court proceedings and which apps to get and how to file complaints about lawyers and judges.
Mrs. Weddigen’s attorney reported this to the court. The court sanctioned Mr. Weddigen thousands of dollars and told him to remove his fb posts about the divorce case. In a concurring opinion, a 4th district justice said that this was covered by the 1st amendment,
he was shocked that esteemed lawyers and judges did not know this, and that the trial court had no jurisdiction to regulate blog posts regarding court case activities. In the main opinion, the sanction was vacated for failure to comply with rules and procedure.
I am up to nearly 400 “friends” on my facebook. I only friend people who complain that they were in court and the proceeding was corrupt (and elder or family member was abused, a child rep was bought, a judge made a decision clearly contrary to all evidence).
I do my duty and I must be touching nerves because things are happening:
To wit:
During the last two months:
1) Largest nursing home operator in California indicted and removed on millions in Medicare Fraud;
2) Largest nursing home operator in Miami Dade county indicted and removed for millions in Medicare Fraud;
3) Seth Gillman of Passages did $1 billion in business with Medicare and the State of Illinois in fake “hospice” work. The feds indicted him in January for $100 million in fraud. Last month, he pled guilty to one count of Medicare Faud and one count of govt fraud and his sentence will be 10 years min.
Fraudsters in nursing home business Draiman and Esformes have been taken out.
You did good asking this question.
Thanks.
Joanne
JoAnne Denison, Executive Director
Justice 4 Every1, NFP
5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120
Niles, IL 60714
Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights
Email me at JoAnne@Denisonlaw.com
Cell Phone 773-255-7608
Work Ph 312-553-1300 or 847-600-3421
efax 312-376-8842
See our website at http://www.justice4every1.com
Please note that this message may contain confidential or attorney client communications. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and destroy all emails you have received in both your inbox and trash or other folders which may contain same. Thank you.

























