To: “JoAnne M. Denison” <email@example.com>,
Subject: Time for law enforcement to enforce the law – TIME FOR JEROME LARKIN, LEA BLACK, and the other co-conspirators to be disbarred! Human rights and the Constitution are not technicalities!
Date: Mar 17, 2016 4:05 PM
It occurred to me that after reading today’s newspaper that too many of us operate under the credo – do not bother me with the facts, I’ve made up my mind.
For months I’ve been referring to the protections afforded by statute to disabled people that corrupt judges and lawyers ignore and 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 violators such as Jerome Larkin of the Illinois lawyer disciplinary commission (IARDC) seek to obfuscate. If we examine 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 as an example, I can illustrate exactly why Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators do not wish any investigation of their conduct much less an HONEST INVESTIGATION.
By use of footnotes, I’m going to explain the statute , to wit:
Information maintained by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Updating the database of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) is an ongoing process. Recent laws may not yet be included in the ILCS database, but they are found on this site as Public Acts soon after they become law. For information concerning the relationship between statutes and Public Acts, refer to the Guide.
Because the statute database is maintained primarily for legislative drafting purposes, statutory changes are sometimes included in the statute database before they take effect. If the source note at the end of a Section of the statutes includes a Public Act that has not yet taken effect, the version of the law that is currently in effect may have already been removed from the database and you should refer to that Public Act to see the changes made to the current law.
You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or canceled if you do not attend.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE.
Service of summons and the petition may be made by a private person 18 years of age or over who is not a party to the action.
(f) Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing. 
(Source: P.A. 98-49, eff. 7-1-13; 98-89, eff. 7-15-13; 98-756, eff. 7-16-14; 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)
This type of statutory language is universal. Every State legislature has made an effort to protect the rights of citizens from the guardianship abuses including but not limited to elder cleansing; however, the corrupt judges, lawyers, judicial officials have all joined in an overt agreement to enhance their pecuniary stature by herding senior citizens into abusive guardianship so that the senior citizen estates can be looted, and last drop of Medicare, Medicaid, social security, pension et al money can be garnered in their personal accounts. As an example, in the Mary Sykes case the estimate of theft is $3 million dollars. In Alice Gore it is 1.5 million plus the value of the gold harvested from her mouth *****.
It has been respectfully suggested that the miscreants and their co-conspirators have not paid the Federal or State taxes on these monies. If we use the Sykes case as a poster board, the intentional misuse of the guardianship (and governmental position) is not an issue. Take any of the miscreants whether it be Judge Connors, the two guardian ad litem, Jerome Larkin, Lea Black **** and you have open and notorious evidence of intimidation, fraud, kidnapping, fiduciary theft, income tax evasion, violation of civil and human rights, spoliation of evidence *****. The road map of 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 is not a secret document – it is a statute of the State of Illinois.
Jerome Larkin, Lea Black, **** and the Supreme Court of Illinois have committed very serious crimes against the State of Illinois by their participation in the ‘cover up’ and by ignoring Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4. Not one of the miscreants called for an HONEST INVESTIGATION! They fought it tooth and nail and used their governmental positions to deny not only the senior citizens due process but the whistleblowing attorneys and member of the public their First Amendment Rights.
Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators deserve and should be prosecuted to the full leader of the law and be required to pay every dime of the State and Federal Income taxes that ordinary citizens routinely have to pay when they err.
 By making particular provisions darker, and underlined I will call attention to important sections.
 A prompt hearing is necessary to assure due process for the alleged incompetent person.
 The appointment of a guardian ad litem is supposed to provide a neutral in the picture to inform the Court of the circumstances that are before the Court. The petitioner has the burden of proof and must prove incompetency by clear and convincing evidence – however, the experts are very unreliable and of easy virtue.
 Service of Summons is the traditional manner in which a person is informed that he/she has to appear in Court to protect his/her rights. This summons has to be served in a very procrustean manner. This is not a Willy nilly procedure it is deadly serious. The summons as noted in the following verbiage must contain some very particular warnings and they must be written in a very special manner.
 Note – the print must be large and bold. During the Sykes and Gore case proceedings the Circuit court did not even print a summons that complied with the direction of the Statute . If you examine some of the probate files it is respectfully suggested that you will few, if any, that comply with the statutory direction.
 Notice and hearing are the keystones of due process. The Illinois legislature sought to make the notice meaningful. The corrupt judge and lawyers treat jurisdiction and due process as mere technicalities. To protect them 18 USCA 371 criminals go to extremes to hide the statutory protections from the public and the silence attorneys who are willing to risk their licenses to comply with the oath that they took when originally sworn to the bar.
 As a disabled person may actually be disabled, to prevent that person from being taken advantage of – and so that the proceedings (i.e. hearing) are not secret or disregarded interested parties are supposed to be given 14 days prior notice. This technicality in the Sodini case was held to be jurisdictional. When Larkin was faced with the fact that in Sykes that not only was Mary not served with the proper summons in the proper manner, but no effort had been made to notify the required family members he resorted to his usual method of addressing the problem. He and his kangaroo panel without a scintilla of evidence told an untruth. They claimed that the required family members knew of the hearing. Unfortunately, the court record in 09 P 4585 (Sykes) reveals that no hearing was ever held. According to GAL Stern, he (Stern) met with GAL Farenga, and the attorney for the petitioner and they drafted an order and Judge Connors signed the order appointing a guardian. Judge Connors in her evidence deposition at page 90 and following admitted she was wired – i.e. She had made the decision prior to a hearing. Thus, the result was predetermined.
[i] Every effort is to be made to make certain that the alleged incompetent is provided with notice of the proceedings and its dire consequences. In the Sykes and Gore cases we had guardians’ ad litem who have been alleged to have been part of the elder cleansing scheme.