The Fraud Business as usual–Billing Medicare multiple times for many drugs

To: Eric Holder <>, “FBI- ( (” <>,……
Subject: The HHS Inspector General report on hospice billing, released today, found Medicare was billed inappropriately for $268 million in 2012 for hospice general inpatient care.
Date: Apr 5, 2016 4:34 PM
The link that I underlined in yellow is another indication of the massive health care fraud that the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission administered by Jerome Larkin is attempting keep lawyers from making public.   The exposure of this fraud in the MaryGSykes blog warranted – according to the Illinois Supreme Court and Mr. Larkin — an interim suspension of one attorney followed by a three year suspension.   Just calling for an Honest Investigation of the Mary Sykes case was worth a four year law license suspension.    Of course, Seth Gillman’s participation in the Hospice fraud and admitted theft of medicare/medicaid funds does, not according to the IARDC warrant even disciplinary proceedings.   (He was indicted in Jan 2014 of $100 million in Medicare, Medicaid and Illinois Health Care Fund fraud, pled guilty to 3 counts last month, agreed to make restitution of the $100 million, and the IARDC has yet to discipline him.)
To the general public the question must have arisen as to why would the Illinois Supreme Court, Judges in secure positions, and lawyers who have clout would jeprodize their careers to steal a few dollars from the Medicare/Medicaid program on the backs of sick old people?    The answer is money.    In 2012 $268 million was billed inappropriately for hospice care.   It was estimated that the enterprises of Attorney Seth Gillman bilked the government out of a billion dollars.
Unfortunately this almost $300 million in theft from the government is chump change!  Once a guardian for profit gets involved in an elder cleansing program every dime of savings of the elderly victim is fair game and you can rest assurred will be stolen or redistributed to the guardian and/or his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators.  With the help of a gullible public and dishonest political figures who are saving the social security of the elderly the miscreants obtain not only the social security payments, but pensions, trust funds etc.   In the Sykes case,  $3 million dollars was never inventoried.   In Gore $1.5 million dollars disappeared.  In Lydia Gore, $8 milion domestic.   In Wyman *******.    Answer 1:  there is ton of money available to be stolen with little or no consequences.   (Yes – these funds are taxable – but do you see Attorney General Lisa Madigan banging on Jerome Larkin’s door to collect the taxes that are due to the State of Illinois?   Larkin as a co-conspirator has joint and several liabilty!)
The last Illinois election provided another revelation.   Answer 2:   To be a Judge in Illinois requires a very substantial payment to the party organization (reported to now be $150,000)   It also take money to get elected.   Judge jobs pay well, but the investment may mean raiding college funds, retirement, or prevent the wife from getting a new Lexus.    Therefore, more than one judge is reported to be open to a little persuasion.   The Sykes jurist on page 90 and following of her evidence deposition admitted that she was wired!   The IARDC took the deposition and certainly read it, but ignored it as part of the cover-up.   To prevent further dissemination of their participation in the health care fraud, the IARDC and their co-conspirators have trashed the Illinois and the United States Constitution.    They openly misrepresented in presentations to the Court the SCOTUS case decisions.   For instance, to the Illinois Supreme Court, they represented an rejected argument in the Alvarez case and ignored the last pargraph of the Sawyer case.  (Alvarez held that even lies are protected by the First Amendment and in Sawyer the SCOTUS rejected sedition as a ground for lawyer discipline.)
The net net is if the USA desires to provide health care to the public it is going to have to enforce the law and put Jerome larkin and his co-conspirators out of business.   The guardianship laws, Americans With Disabilities, and the First Amendment will have to be more than laws on the books to placate  gadflies and assorted do-gooders.   The guardianship situation is per se a deprivation of civil rights!    It is justified on the basis of protecting the rights of the disabled person to participate as fully as possible in the American experience.   New flash!   being a non-person who is routinely exploited, abused and deprived of the rights of citizens is not the American experience.
We need instanter an HONEST INVESTIGATION  of this serious corruption.   We cannot wait until ******* is President!

From Ken Ditkowsky–Protecting the First Amendment from Goons and Thugs

To: “” <>,
Subject: Re: Left-wing Riot Gave Trump a Larger Audience
Date: Mar 12, 2016 10:07 AM
Apparently we are reaching the insane stage of the political season a bit early this time around.     Historically, the partisans demonstrate their hypocrisy closer to election day, however, right out in the open are intelligent thinking people who discussing limiting the political speech of those that they disagree with.    As an example, a ‘kid’ who had been a soldier opened his big mouth and proclaimed that he was going to middle east to fight for ISIS.     He bought a ticket, traveled to Turkey where he was arrested and charged.
Where was the Civil Liberties Union?    Where were all the liberals?    Where were all the conservatives?    Indeed, where were you and I?     Uniformly, we are all outraged by “thought police” and limits on our freedom; but we all joined together in our outrage and contrary to the core values of America none of us (me included) uttered a word of protest.     Uniformly we looked at the situation and said good riddance!
As a victim of a civil rights violation I should be more sensitive and understanding.   I have and am yelling bloody murder as Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators have tried to stop me from demanding an HONEST investigation.    Indeed, I and others are outraged that government officials were ravaging the core values and principles of America – our rights of free speech.     Could I as an attorney and a citizen lose my right to practice law for advocating for Bernie Sanders?   What if my favorite candidate was Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?      According to Jerome Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court I could indeed lose my license.       I wrote to the Attorney General of the United States and was asked if I was repentant!    When I stated that I was not and would do it again I got a four year suspension of my law license!    JoAnne Denison wrote a blog – she got an interim suspension and three years.   Lanre Amu, lost his license for practicing law while black.
Getting back to the point.     The SCOTUS has made it abundantly clear that all political and content related speech is protected by the First Amendment.    Thus, an American supporting ISIS, the National Socialists, the Democrats, the Republicans etc. is protected.     The distinction between speech and action unfortunately is blurred.    Some of the blurring is intentional and therefore if the blurring is done by government we as citizens must view it with suspicion.
The travel to the Mideast to join ISIS is a special case as ISIS has made a uniform threat to America and its existence and has committed overt acts in pursuance thereof.    The action is thus reconciled as treason or its equivalent.     BUT THIS BEGS THE QUESTION!     Is it treason to support Bernie Sanders.    He is an admitted socialist!    Is it treason to support Donald Trump?    He is overtly politically incorrect.    Contrary to some of the partisans the answer is still no – it is not treason to support candidates that the mainstream media does not support.    Then – why is it treason to support ISIS?
The answer is – pursuant to Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution and the First Amendment it is not.     However, when that support crosses the line it may be an expatriating act.     Voting in a foreign election, taking up arms in causes that are against the interests of the United States of America, intentional renunciation of citizenship, or doing acts that are overtly contrary to the Laws, customs, and serious interests of the United States of America (Treason).     Thus, when this young man actually donned the mantel of ISIS he committed an expatriating act and became an enemy combatant!     As such he forfeited the protections of America and our core values .  
The foregoing is not a rationalization, but, part of America law from day one.     Citizenship comes with responsibility and duties.    Both Mr. Larkin and myself took the same oath to defend the Constitution.    Thus, both of us had the responsibility to speak out in outrage when Justice Connors on page 90 and following of her evidence deposition admitted that she was ‘wired!’   (i.e.   she was predetermined to find Mary Sykes incompetent and predetermined to appoint a particular guardian for her) [1]
I point this all out as the elder cleansing scandal is so voracious and public officials and corrupt judicial officials have expended so much effort to destroy America’s core values.    Worse yet, we are buying into the problem and not standing up and being counted.     If we allow the civil rights of one citizen to be compromised we guaranty that all our rights are in jeopardy.      Our National motto has always been – I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death to protect your right to say it!      It is also for this reason every day I donate a few minutes of my time to write these e-mails urging an HONEST investigation.     I am not ‘cowed’ by Larkin’s intimidation and criminal behavior!     I am disappointed that he has been able to get away with his criminality (and felonies) for so long.    In a perfect world, Larkin and each of his co-conspirators would be in an orange federal issue jumpsuit rather than his usual shark skinned garb.   ( There is no place in public life for predators or their apologists – see 18 USCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 and 18 USCA 4)

[1] On page 90 and following Judge Connors points out that had she known that she did not have jurisdiction she would have stopped the proceedings, corrected the deficiency and then reached the same result.     The further perfidy exposed by this evidence deposition was the fact that Connors admitted not only that she was ‘wired’ (fixed) but she did not do her job.   With this deposition of record, Connors was elevated to the Appellate Court of Illinois.    It is no wonder that Larkin and his ilk are so ready to abandon their responsibilities, misrepresent the decisions of the SCOTUS and thumb their noses at their legal and ethical responsibilities.

From: GOPUSA Weekend Update <>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 9:15 AM
Subject: Left-wing Riot Gave Trump a Larger Audience