Property Records (ARDC, OPG, judges, etc.–pay attention). Money laundering, Hobbs Act violations and Dishonest Services

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwZWphX3lxd3VoM3M

Once again, I am publishing the questionable property records of judges, attorneys for the OPG and ARDC which appears to indicate a pattern of one person taking out a loan and another nefarious person paying it off to avoid passing cash over the table or bench but which really amounts to nothing but the standard and prosaic crimes of money laundering, Hobbs Act and Dishonest Services violations, which it is.

I have had a request from an annoying person who couldn’t find it on the blog and started to be a pissant, even tho she is a professional highly talented writer, blogger and activist.

I have no idea why her self esteem is so low.  She should be proud and happy and solicitous to everyone beneath her, which I am most certainly am.

I am only a poor lowly nobody who serves the poor, the trod upon and the disenfranchised.  Why she seems to think I am some one special is way beyond me.

So here it is again.  I have already reported this to the FBI, the Illinois attorney generals and the Illinois OIG’s but I think they are busy with their Starbucks.

Someday, I believe, they will put down the Starbucks and start to write criminal complaints, but that’s for another day.

Go figure.

Joanne

 

From Ken Ditkowsky and Elena Federova–stopping the corruption in the courts and in health care

While Jerome Larkin and the IARDC laugh at us all the way to the bank it should be noted that the United States of America is doing some prosecution of the bad guys, to wit:

March 2017

March 17, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice Medicare Fraud Strike Force Case
Houston-Area Registered Nurse Pleads Guilty to Conspiring to Defraud Medicare of More than $5 Million
A Houston-Area registered nurse pleaded guilty today for his role in a Medicare fraud scheme that resulted in losses to Medicare of more than $5 million.
March 17, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Puerto Rico
Doctor Sentenced To Seven Years In Prison For Health Care Fraud
SAN JUAN, P.R. – Doctor Juan José Tull-Abreu was sentenced to serve 63 months of imprisonment for health care fraud, and a consecutive term of 24 months for aggravated identity theft, for a total term of imprisonment of 87 months, announced United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez.
March 16, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Washington
Spokane Area Cardiologist, Dr. Romeo Pavlic, to Pay $300,000 Resolving Alleged False Health Care Claims
Spokane, WA – Today, the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the Eastern District of Washington announced a settlement agreement with Dr. Romeo Pavlic and various companies he owns. The settlement resolves allegations that for years Dr. Pavlic, a Spokane-area cardiologist, falsely billed Medicare and Medicaid by repeatedly and falsely claiming to have provided services and tests to vulnerable patients when in fact he had not.
March 14, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice Medicare Fraud Strike Force Case
South Florida Home Health Owner Charged for Role in $15 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
A South Florida home health care owner was charged in an indictment unsealed today for his alleged participation in a $15 million health care fraud scheme involving fraudulent claims for home health services.
March 14, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Connecticut
Stamford Dental Office Manager Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Insurance Companies
Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, today announced that ELENA ILIZAROV, 44, of Stamford, waived her right to be indicted and pleaded guilty yesterday before U.S. District Judge Victor A. Bolden in Bridgeport to one count of wire fraud stemming from her use of an identity theft victim’s personal identifying information to submit fraudulent bills to private insurance companies offering dental insurance.
March 13, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Charles River Laboratories International Inc. Agrees to Pay United States $1.8 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
Charles River Laboratories International Inc. has agreed to pay the U.S. government $1.8 million to settle claims that it violated the False Claims Act by improperly charging for labor and other associated costs that were not actually provided on certain National Institutes of Health contracts, the Justice Department announced today. Charles River is a for-profit corporation headquartered in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
March 10, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Middle District of Pennsylvania
Lancaster County Woman Guilty Of Healthcare Fraud
HARRISBURG- The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that Tammie Sensenig, age 45, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty March 8, 2017, before United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson to a criminal information charging her with healthcare fraud.
March 7, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Middle District of Florida
Tampa Man Pleads Guilty To Paying Health Care Kickbacks
Tampa, FL – United States Attorney A. Lee Bentley, III announces that Anthonio Miller (26, Tampa) today pleaded guilty to conspiracy to pay kickbacks in connection with a federal health care benefit program. He faces a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison.
March 6, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
California Clinic Owner Sentenced to 63 Months in Prison for Role in Occupational Therapy Fraud Scheme
A rehabilitation clinic operator in Los Angeles County was sentenced to 63 months in prison today for his role in a $3.4 million Medicare fraud scheme that involved billing for occupational therapy services that were not medically necessary and not provided.
March 6, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Texas
Clinic Manager Heads to Prison for Health Care Fraud
HOUSTON – The 47-year-old owner and operator of Elite P. Care Medical Services has been sentenced for her role in a health care fraud conspiracy that billed Medicare and Medicaid for more than $1 million in fraudulent health care claims, announced U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson.
March 6, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of New Jersey
Bergen County Doctor Convicted Of Taking Bribes In Test-Referral Scheme With New Jersey Clinical Lab
NEWARK, N.J. – A family doctor practicing in Bergen County, New Jersey, was convicted today of all 10 counts of an indictment charging him with accepting bribes in exchange for test referrals as part of a long-running and elaborate scheme operated by Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services LLC (BLS), of Parsippany, New Jersey, its president and numerous associates, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.
March 6, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Vermont
Brandon Woman Sentenced for Medicaid Fraud
The Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Vermont announced that Misti Baker, 36, of West Rutland, Vermont, was sentenced on Friday by United States District Court Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford for healthcare fraud. Judge Crawford sentenced Baker to time served plus two years of supervised release and ordered her to pay $77,306.57 in restitution.
March 3, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Unlicensed Medical Professional Convicted for Role in $1.3 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
A federal jury in Houston convicted an unlicensed medical professional who was posing as a physician yesterday for his participation in a $1.3 million Medicare fraud scheme.
March 3, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Florida
Two Women Plead Guilty to Orchestrating $20 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme at Seven Miami Area Home Health Agencies
Two Miami residents pleaded guilty today to fraud charges stemming from their roles in a $20 million home health care fraud scheme.
March 3, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Maryland
Biller for Medical Equipment Provider Sentenced to Four Years in Federal Prison for Health Care Fraud, Aggravated Identity Theft and Defrauding the IRS by Failing to File Tax Returns
Baltimore, Maryland – U.S. District Judge Marvin J. Garbis sentenced Elma Myles, age 52, on March 2, 2017, to four years in prison, in connection with her role in a health care fraud scheme, aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to defraud the United States for failing to file income tax returns. Judge Garbis also ordered Myles to pay restitution of $1,207,585.38 to Medicaid.
March 3, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Western District of Virginia
Personal Care Attendant Pleads Guilty to Making a False Statement as it Relates to a Health Care Benefit
Charlottesville, VIRGINIA – A personal care attendant, who for four years lied about the amount of hours she worked for a homebound retiree, pled guilty yesterday in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Charlottesville to federal false statement charges, Acting United States Attorney Rick A. Mountcastle and Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring announced.
March 2, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Third Detroit-Area Physician Pleads Guilty in $5.4 Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
A Detroit-area physician pleaded guilty today for his role in a $5.4 million Medicare fraud scheme involving phony physician visits and drug prescriptions.
March 2, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Texas
All 12 Convicted in Health Care Fraud Conspiracy Involving Area Mental Health Centers
HOUSTON – A federal jury has convicted the final defendant of 12 involved in a conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks relating to the Medicare program, announced U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson. The jury deliberated for four hours following a three-day trial before convicting Cheryl Waller, 70, of Houston, of one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks and one count of receiving kickbacks.
March 1, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of New York
Cardiologist, Neurologist, And Others Charged In $50 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme, And Civil Suit Filed Against Clinic And Participants In The Fraud
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, William F. Sweeney Jr., the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Scott J. Lampert, Special Agent-in-Charge of the New York Regional Office of the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (“HHS-OIG”), and James P. O’Neill, the Commissioner of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), announced today criminal and civil actions relating to a 12-year scheme to defraud Medicaid, Medicare, and other private health insurance companies out of more than $50 million. Today’s actions include the unsealing of an Indictment charging ASIM HAMEEDI, FAWAD HAMEEDI, MICHELLE LANDOY, DESIREE SCOTT, EMAD SOLIMAN, and ARIF HAMEEDI with, among other things, health care fraud, identity theft, and making false statements, and the filing of a civil fraud lawsuit against CITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., and ASIM HAMEEDI, among others, seeking treble damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act for the fraudulent claims for reimbursement submitted by CITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES to Medicare and Medicaid between 2003 and November 2015.

February 2017

February 28, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Northern District of Texas
Sixteen Individuals Charged in $60 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
DALLAS – An indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Dallas last week, and unsealed today, charges 16 individuals with offenses related to their participation in a health care fraud scheme, announced John Parker, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas.
February 24, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Administrator of Miami-Area Home Health Agency Sentenced to 126 Months in Prison for Involvement in $2.5 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
Today, the administrator of a Miami-area home health agency was sentenced to a 126 month prison term for his role in a $2.5 million Medicare fraud scheme.
February 24, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Texas
Jury Convicts Rio Grande Valley Area Durable Medical Equipment Company Owner of Health Care Fraud
McALLEN, Texas – A McAllen federal jury has convicted the owner of an area durable medical equipment (DME) company owner on all counts for her scheme to defraud Texas Medicaid through fraudulent billings, announced U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson. The jury deliberated for six hours following a seven-day trial before convicting Maria Garza, 41, of McAllen, on all 18 counts as charged.
February 22, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Puerto Rico
Owner Of Durable Medical Equipment Company And Three Physicians Charged With Health Care Fraud And Aggravated Identity Theft
SAN JUAN, P.R. – On February 13, 2017, a Federal Grand Jury in the District of Puerto Rico returned a superseding indictment charging Dr. Dante A. Rodríguez-Rivera, Javier Efraín Siverio-Echevarría, Dr. George D. Alcántara-Cardi, Dr. Martha Nieves, Javier Antonio Aguirre- Estrada, and Carlos Maldonado-López with multiple counts of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, health care fraud and aggravated identity theft. The defendants were arrested today, announced Rosa Emilia Rodríguez Vélez, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico, Scott Lampert, the Special Agent in Charge of the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS-OIG”), and Douglas A. Leff, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Puerto Rico Field Office (“FBI”).
February 23, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Doctor Pleads Guilty To Selling Prescriptions Of Suboxone And Klonopin
PHILADELPHIA – Dr. Alan Summers, 78, of Ambler, PA, pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him in a scheme to sell commonly abused prescription drugs in exchange for cash payments. Dr. Summers pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, distribution of controlled substances, health care fraud, and money laundering, and was announced by Acting United States Attorney Louis D. Lappen, Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent-in-Charge Gary Tuggle, and Special Agent-in-Charge Nick DiGuilio with Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
February 22, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Western District of Virginia
Bristol, Virginia Woman Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Healthcare Fraud
Abingdon, VIRGINIA – A Bristol woman, who along with her husband and another woman, was accused of healthcare fraud charges, has pled guilty to federal conspiracy charges, Acting United States Attorney Rick A. Mountcastle, Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring and Nick DiGiulio, Special Agent in Charge, Philadelphia Regional Office for U.S. Health and Human Services – Office of Inspector General announced today.
February 16, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of New Jersey
Oncology Practice, Doctor And Practice Manager Pay $1.7 Million To Resolve Allegations They Billed Medicare For Illegally Imported Drugs
NEWARK, N.J. – A Monmouth County doctor, his oncology practice, and his wife, who managed the practice, have agreed to pay the United States $1.7 million to resolve allegations that they illegally imported and used unapproved chemotherapy drugs from foreign distributors and illegally billed Medicare, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced today.
February 15, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Northern District of Georgia
Atlanta-area Dentist Sentenced for nearly $1 Million in Medicaid Fraud
ATLANTA – Dr. Oluwatoyin Solarin has been sentenced to one year, six months in federal prison for filing false claims with the Georgia Medicaid program totaling nearly $1 million.
February 13, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Texas
Former CEO of Nebraska Pharmaceutical Benefits Manager Guilty in Kickback Scheme
TYLER, Texas – The former CEO of a Nebraska pharmaceutical benefits manager has pleaded guilty to engaging in illegal kickbacks in the Eastern District of Texas, announced Acting United States Attorney Brit Featherston today.
February 10, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Florida
Plantation Physician and Physician Practice to Pay $750,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Involving Medically Unnecessary Sinus and Throat Procedures
Dr. Paul B. Tartell, an ENT physician practicing in Plantation, Florida and his practice Paul B. Tartell, M.D., P.L., d/b/a South Florida Sinus & Allergy Center, have agreed to pay $750,000 to resolve allegations that he violated the False Claims Act by billing for surgical endoscopies with debridement and laryngeal stroboscopies that were not provided or not medically necessary.
February 10, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Western District of Louisiana
Federal jury finds Shreveport mental health facility administrator guilty of kickback scheme
SHREVEPORT, La. – United States Attorney Stephanie A. Finley announced that a federal jury found a former Shreveport mental health facility administrator guilty Thursday of taking part in a kickback scheme.
February 9, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Western District of Texas
El Paso Behavioral Health Facility Pays $860,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Under Civil Settlement with United States
Today, University Behavioral Health of El Paso, LLC (“UBH”) paid $860,000 under a civil settlement with the Department of Justice to resolve allegations under the False Claims Act that the hospital paid unlawful remuneration under the Anti-Kickback Act and violated the Stark Law when it improperly paid a physician who made referrals to the hospital pursuant to a personal services agreement.
February 8, 2017; U.S. Attorney; District of Massachusetts
Healthcare Sales Representative Sentenced for Obstructing Federal Investigation
BOSTON – A sales representative for multiple healthcare companies was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Boston in connection with obstructing an investigation into kickbacks paid to medical professionals.
February 7, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of Florida
Dr. Gary Marder and the United States Consent to a Final Judgement of Over $18 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
Gary L. Marder, D.O., a physician residing in Palm Beach County and the owner and operator of the Allergy, Dermatology & Skin Cancer Centers in Port St. Lucie and Okeechobee, and the United States of America have stipulated to a consent final judgment of over $18 million to settle False Claims Act allegations against Dr. Marder. Co-defendant, Robert I. Kendall, M.D., a physician practicing in Coral Gables, has also agreed to pay the United States $250,000 to settle allegations that he violated the False Claims Act.
February 7, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Delaware County Podiatrist Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for Health Care Fraud
PHILADELPHIA – Today, a federal judge sentenced Stephen A. Monaco, a former podiatrist, to 97 months’ imprisonment for defrauding Medicare, Medicaid and private victim insurance companies, announced Acting United States Attorney Louis D. Lappen. Defendant Monaco pleaded guilty to health care fraud on August 23, 2016, and surrendered his DEA license.
February 6, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Healthcare Service Provider to Pay $60 Million to Settle Medicare and Medicaid False Claims Act Allegations
A major U.S. hospital service provider, TeamHealth Holdings, as successor in interest to IPC Healthcare Inc., f/k/a IPC The Hospitalists Inc. (IPC), has agreed to resolve allegations that IPC violated the False Claims Act by billing Medicare, Medicaid, the Defense Health Agency and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program for higher and more expensive levels of medical service than were actually performed (a practice known as “up-coding”), the Department of Justice announced today. Under the settlement agreement, TeamHealth has agreed to pay $60 million, plus interest.
February 6, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Southern District of New York
Clinic Manager Pleads Guilty In $70 Million Scheme To Defraud Medicare And Medicaid
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that EDUARD ZAVALUNOV, a manager of two health care clinics in Queens, New York, pled guilty today before U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, and health care fraud, for his role in a massive health care fraud scheme through which three medical clinics in Brooklyn and Queens submitted over $70 million in fraudulent claims to Medicaid and Medicare.
February 1, 2017; U.S. Department of Justice
Former Executive of Tenet Healthcare Corporation Charged for Alleged Role in $400 Million Scheme to Defraud
A former senior executive of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, was indicted for his alleged role in an over $400 million scheme to defraud. The indictment alleges that the scheme to defraud victimized the U.S. government, the Georgia and South Carolina Medicaid Programs, and prospective patients of Tenet hospitals.
February 1, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Middle District of Florida
Fort Myers Urologist Agrees To Pay More Than $3.8 Million For Ordering Unnecessary Medical Tests
Fort Myers, FL – United States Attorney A. Lee Bentley, III announces that Meir Daller, M.D. has agreed to pay $3.81 million to the government to resolve allegations that he violated the False Claims Act by causing claims to be submitted to federal health care programs for laboratory tests that were not medically necessary.
February 1, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Kentucky
Pain Management Physician Resolves False Claims Act Allegations
LEXINGTON, Ky. – Pain management physician Dr. Robert Windsor has agreed to the entry of a $20 million consent judgment to resolve allegations that he violated the False Claims Act by billing federal health care programs for surgical monitoring services that he did not perform and for medically unnecessary diagnostic tests. Dr. Windsor owned pain management clinics in Georgia and Kentucky that operated under the umbrella of National Pain Care, Inc., including clinics in Lexington, London, Somerset, Hazard, Prestonsburg, and Pikeville, Kentucky.
February 1, 2017; U.S. Attorney; Northern District of Iowa
Iowa Nursing Facility, Its Ownership, and Its Management Agree to Pay $100,000 to Resolve Allegations that Residents Received Worthless Care
The Abbey of Le Mars, Inc., and other individuals with financial interests in the Abbey’s operations, agreed to pay $100,000 to settle allegations they violated the False Claims Act by submitting or causing claims to be submitted to Medicaid when the care provided to nursing facility residents was so grossly substandard that the care was worthless and effectively without value.
This elder cleansing fraud (retro=active abortion of the elderly) is probably the biggest crime way in American History.   The elderly kidnapped and railroaded into nursing homes for profit are to the miscreants just a commodity (their words) to be exploited.    Public officials, such as Jerome Larkin, feel totally immune however, their contribution toward the WAR ON THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED (and corruption in the courts) is a serious factor in preventing any HEALTH CARE PROGRAM (including Trumpcare) from being successful.
The list of indictments is akin to spitting in the ocean!   Philip Esformes stole a billion dollars from Medicare doing exactly the same program that is openly and notorious being carried on in Chicago under another group of names by the Chicago Nursing home Cabal.    The metastatic cancer of retroactive abortion for the elderly is about as venal as any criminal enterprise can get.   Indeed, it is not surprising that attorney disciplinary commissions are interesting in shutting down the free flow of information and people such as Jerome Larkin spit in the eye of the Rule of Law and challenge America to enforce 18 USCA 371 conspiracy charges against them!    They are the Judicial and Political Elite – we are the great unwashed!    Why should anyone listen to us??????
Maybe it is because we are part of the dissaffected who were tired of being lied to and we at this point in time are recognized as the people who either put Donald Trump over the top and made him the President of the United States or directly or indirectly back his Presidency.    The message should be very clear to the Political and Judicial elite — we are tired of writing to Senator Durbin about the American holocaust and receiving from him a copy of one of his speeches as to how he is in favor of social security.
We all know that the guardian, appointed by a corrupt judge who Larkin and the IARDC is protecting, will get the social security payment.   We also all know that this judge and this guardian are going to contribute substantially to the re-election and the retention of perfidious political figures who will perpetuate the American Holocaust.


From: chicago summer <summer.chicago@yahoo.com>
To: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>;
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: Wells Fargo bank MASSIVE crimes covered by judges- sales of illegal securities and respond from SEC

Hi, Ken,
It was nice to learn about your blog and speak about your fight against  Illinois corruption. I found particularly interesting your research on Attorney Disciplinary Committee corruption,which I can confirm with 100%. ALL my complaints against lawyers who forged documents, made false statements, obstructed justice, ect. were closed. Lawyers who even mentioned words “judge has a record of corruption” are mercilessly attacked and disbarred. Even JUDGES admit oppression in our Courts and disagree with its  practices, as well as most prominent lawyers like Mr. Clifford. See the link attached.
Thank you for respond to my letter to the Senate Committee on Judiciary for audit of Illinois Court and place corrupt judges under personal criminal liability.
However, the roots of corruption as well as the Government betrayal of American people  are much deeper and nastier because those Americans  whose properties are confiscated by judges  already paid the ultimate price and are entitled for justice and protection against criminal banks.
One of my favorite Presidents,  Thomas Jefferson, said:
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
Thomas Jefferson, 3rd president of US (1743 – 1826)  
Foreclosures  filed on behalf of non-existing REMIC Trusts by Servicers like Wells Fargo bank  are not only illegal per se since they directly violate the fundamental  doctrine  of the Constitution ( if this document still means anything to our judges and “political elite“) – the Plaintiff must have a standing and show a real harm, which non-existing  Trusts obviously do not have. I attached a Motion filed by Mayer Brown LLP lawyer Charles Woodworth where he insists that “a foreclosure complaint presents a justifiable matter REGARDLESS OF STANDING!”So, all other parties must  have standing, except BANKS!
 
In other words, who needs Constitution if “frankly, they [banks] own the place?!” [Senator Richard Durbin, re US Senate ].
 
American people non-voluntarily gave banks trillions of dollars, for free, which disappeared on banks’ CEOs accounts, and shared with corrupt judges and crooked politicians to cover for this fraud. Now we all have to deal with a criminally divided County and   balance on the brink of a civil war and revolution, thanks to the reckless “elite”, crooked judges  and criminal banks.
 
I consider it as a high treason and criminal disloyalty.
 
I will provide more information and share new developments in my case, as well as in other cases. Attached is 2013 letter from Brennan Center of Justice to IL Supreme Court re corruption. Of course it was ignored: our businessman Justices are too busy distributing  judicial seats to their cronies and their political friends , for money, of course, that today’s skyrocketing crimes and falling apart Chicago apparently took them by surprise.
 
Thanks again for respond.
Elena
 
 
On Monday, March 20, 2017 7:06 PM, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Banks acted very badly as to foreclosures.
The government regulations created the problem as they barred the lenders from asking very important questions, however, the government made it possible for large sums of money to be made by bundling mortgages and selling them as mortgage backed securities.    These mortgages in many cases were mortgages that were under water on day one and had little probability of being paid off.   When the scam became public the mortgage backed securities had to be bundled and individually foreclosed.    This was a disaster as many of the lenders were fly by night operations and thus paperwork was in a sorry shape.
To solve the problem the Political and Judicial elite set up Mortgage courts.   These were basically Cafeteria Courts designed to expedite the mortgage foreclosure and eliminate any defenses.   This is where many people stand today. A judge who has ethics has such a backlog in his courtroom that he can never be out on the golf course by 3:00 – he might have to work all day every day!

From Facebook-First Documented case of Child Abuse was reported to Animal Cruelty Agency in 1874

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/11/09/the-case-of-mary-ellen-the-first-documented-case-of-child-abuse-in-the-us-was-reported-to-the-animal-welfare-agency-in-1874/

An Interesting piece of trivia. What took the authorities so long to protect abused children in the US?

The case of Mary Ellen – the first documented case of child abuse in the US was reported to the Animal Welfare Agency in 1874

Nov 9, 2016
SHARE:

This may come as a surprise to many but the first documented case of child abuse which was reported and dealt with in 1874 in the United States was in fact first reported to an animal welfare organization.

Not because children were considered animals, but the regulations and resources were so scarce that no government agency thought of this as a serious issue. So one can safely make this argument based on the evidence that animals had welfare rights well before children in the United States.

The case in question was of a young girl, Mary Ellen, who was born into a poor family in New York City in 1864 to Fanny and Thomas Wilson.

Mary Ellen
Mary Ellen

After Mary’s father died in the civil war, her mother struggled to raise her and could not find time to raise her and work at the same time. Fanny Wilson decided to leave her young child with a caretaker and kept on working days and nights and made the regular payments to the carer.

However, when poverty and unemployment restricted her from regular payment, the carer left Mary with Department of Charities. When Fanny came back for her girl, she was told that Mary had died and that they had buried her; Mary was alive and had just turned two at the time she was handed over to the Depart of Charities.

Mary’s life took an abrupt turn towards pain and misery when she was adopted by Thomas and Mary McCormack who had come into the charity and claimed to be Mary’s biological parents.

They were never asked by the Department of charities for any proof of parenthood, and the child was handed over the couple. Soon after Mary arrived in her new home, Mr. McCormack died, and Mary remarried to Francis McConnell.

Mrs. McConnell was a cruel person who showed no love or kindness towards the child and scolded her badly even when she could barely speak.

Neighbours could hear Mary scream all day when Mrs. McConnell used to beat her, often fifteen minutes straight without any remorse. Mary was not allowed to leave the house and had to stay indoors, and was beaten by anything that Mrs. Connelly found nearby.

Mary’s ordeals didn’t end even when Mrs. Connelly left the house for her works: Mary was kept in the chain in a small closet with an old piece of carpet to rest on and a dirty quilt to warm her.

Mary was beaten, starved, cut and burned for more than seven years and no one came to her aid. By that time Mary had only seen violence, scolding, torture and beating and did not know anything about the outside world.

When the family moved to another apartment, the neighbours took notice of the beating and a visiting Methodist mission sent Mrs. Etta Angell Wheeler to investigate the matter further.

When Mrs. Etta managed to enter the house, she found Mary in a terrible condition; scars all over her arms and faces Mary was only wearing a shirt and pyjamas, despite the fact that it was freezing cold in New York.

Mary Ellen McCormack in 1874
Mary Ellen McCormack in 1874

Mary was standing on a stool and washing dishes while Mrs. Connelly continuously scolded her for all that was wrong in her own life.

After observing little Mary’s plight, Mrs. Etta decided to do something to save the child from any more abuse, but it took Mrs. Etta another three months to make any progress in the matter.

Everywhere she went for help she was met with ignorance and stubborn bureaucracy; Mrs. Etta was told that despite the ‘unideal’ conditions Mary had to live in, she was better off in the care of Mrs. Connelly then living on her own.

Despite spending days knocking at the doors of countless agencies, Mrs. Wheeler failed to convince the authorities that the little girl needed attention and had to remove from the custody of this evil woman.

Desperate for help and utterly saddened, Mrs. Wheeler spoke to her niece about the matter who suggested seeing Mr. Henry Bergh who was the founder of American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Mrs. Wheeler initially got agitated upon hearing her niece’s suggestion and replied that Mary was no animal, but her niece convinced her that Mr. Bergh was a kind man and he had connections in many government agencies and surely he was the man who could help the little girl get out of the hell.

Mrs. Wheeler was desperate for help and memories of Mary’s scarred face, and helpless eyes convinced her to meet Mr. Bergh. Upon meeting Mr. Bergh, Mrs. Wheeler was told that she needed documentary evidence to back her claims, only then Mr. Bergh would be in better position to help her in the matter.

After obtaining the written testimonies from the neighbors, Mrs. Wheeler presented the evidence to Mr. Bergh who sent an agent to the neighborhood to confirm the testimonies.

Mary Ellen
Mary Ellen

The case was then presented to the court via ASPCA’s attorney Elbridge T. Gerry who prepared the petition and asked the court for the permission to remove Mary Ellen from the apartment.

The case was heard by the Supreme Court Judge Lawrence who approved Mary Ellen’s removal from Mrs. Connelly’s custody.

Mary Ellen was brought to court and testified that she was beaten day and night by her ‘mother’. Mrs. Connelly was found guilty by the court and was sentenced to five years of hard labor whereas Mary Ellen was sent to a safe custodian.

Here is another story from our vault:Coogan Act: Stopped parents of famous child actors seizing all the childs money

Mary Ellen slowly but surely recovered and lived until 1956; she died at the age of 92 after having lived a happy and long life.

 

 

Secrets to Jewel Monopoly Card

The ones I don’t have after collecting about 100 of these are the ones that likely win.

Contact me if you have the missing ones and don’t want to collect 100 and we can share the prize 50/50.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwdC16U0pnOGd2aGs

you can also use this table to easily use a find and mark off the ones you have too.

the gameboard is nutz and impossible to use.

Hoping you (and maybe I) win $1 million.  I’m using my winnings for my charity. So far, I have won a container of salt and a donut, so exciting.

 

From Ken Ditkowsky on another Dishonest Response from the ARDC as it pertains to the Sykes case

(I will post their response later)

Now as we all know, and from all the publicity surrounding the Sykes case on Facebook, blogs and other social media, the Sykes 09 P 4585 case is nothing but a classic in the world of guardianship were the mantra “target, guardianize, isolate, drain the estate and then narcotize to death” clearly applies.  The murder of Mary G. Sykes, for whom this blog is named, has clearly not been investigated, nor has some $3 million missing from her estate ever been investigated.  No Trust accounting for Trust assets was ever filed with the court or provided to Gloria.  The court never seemed to care, why is that?

Worse yet, documents have recently been uncovered which were dumped in her court file–not stamped by the clerk–but indicate ex parte communications between Judge Stuart and Cynthia Farenga and others that they knew about the disappearance of valuable coins fro the get go.

Not it has erupted that my court reporter was uncliensed and not just for a few months–but 10 long ears and she claims she “just forgot”.  The ARDC backs her up (for some strange unknown reason, if the court reporter is unlicensed to practice shorthand, then why do I need a license to practice law?  Seems to me to be fair I get 10 years unlicensed practice of law now and the ARDC should protect me on that one).  Basically, they have painted themselves into the  proverbial corner with all their legerdemain.

Below is Ken’s response to their absurd pleading, filed with the Ill. Supreme Court a couple days ago.

To:
Subject: Re: More packs of lies from the ardc
Date: Mar 16, 2017 8:15 AM
JoAnne,
The patent and basic DISHONESTY
 that is exhibited by the IARDC response to your motion is indeed evident.
Lets start at square 1.   How is it dishonest on your part, or in fact any lawyer’s part to disclose to the public corruption in the Court?.   Mr. Larkin is well aware that in his possession is the deposition that his attorneys took of Judge Maureen Connors and therein is contained her admission that she was dishonest i.e ‘wired’ in her handling of the Sykes case.  09 P 4585 wherein she stated if the case were running without jurisdiction she would just dismiss it and refile it and come to the same result–which is a statement consistent with case fixing (judges are supposed to rule on the evidence before them).  It was dishonest on the part of Jerome Larkin and the IARDC in prosecuting the attorneys who disclosed Judge Connors’dishonesty.     Indeed, had Larkin and the IARDC done their jobs they would have discovered that in the Sykes case Judge Connors acted without jurisdiction.   The summons required by 755 ILCS 5/11a -10 was never served on Mary, and the Sheriff in his letter points out that his office never served summons at all.
Let’s go a step further – the file demonstrates the criminal intent of each of the miscreant guardians (including but not limited to the guardians ad litem and the judge).    The direction to the Sheriff was to serve Mary in COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.   Even Mr. Larkin was aware that Mary had been removed from Cook County and was being held (against her will) in DuPage County.    In fact the Judge appointed GAL Adam Stern as the 2nd GAL because he resides in DuPage County.   This appointment was at the request of GAL Cynthia Farenga.
The perfidy and FRAUD continues as Mary’s next of kin (755 ILCS 5/11a -10) were never notified of the hearing that is mandatory to determine if Mary was incompetent and pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/11a -3b must be held.   Had Larkin not been engaged in an 18 USCA 371 cover-up and breaching his public trust he would have observed that NO HEARING WAS EVER HELD as to Mary Sykes’ competency.   Judge Connors just entered an order without any compliance with due process.  Every time Mary appeared in court to protest the abusive guardianship headed her way, she was told to be quiet or not speak.  How convenient for the nefarious planners.
How disclosing these facts and facts concerning numerous other similar frauds being processed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Probate Division was or is dishonesty on your part is amazing and so outrageous that an Honest Federal Investigation of not only the guardianship fraud is essential, but the cover-up and the illegal and excessive pecuniary remunerations that appear to flow toward all the miscreants.    A Philip Esformes does not steal a billion dollars from Medicare without some government connivance, case fixing and overt corruption.
The SCOTUS cases, Rule 8.3, and 18 USCA 4 require that all attorneys (including Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators) report to law enforcement authorities the felonies that are so obvious in the Mary Sykes, Alice Gore, Carolyn Wyman **** cases.     These Frauds are serious stuff.    18 USCA 371 also by definition assessed FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAX LIABILITY to Jerome Larkin’s conspiratorial actions and Rule 8.3 requires that we report this tax fraud (evasion) to Federal Authorities.   Please note that the Attorney General of the United States is notified.    (There is no just reason that Larkin and his co-conspirators should not pay the FEDERAL and State Income taxes that are due – I’ve also notified that Attorney General of Illinois pursuant to Rule8.3)   If these reports are under Illinois criteria dishonesty – so be it!
The Petition that you filed with the Supreme Court of Illinois objects to the inherent dishonesty that Mr. Larkin and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission has exhibited from day one in regard to the elder cleansing War on the Elderly and the Disabled that Larkin and his co-conspirators are raging.   ( I realize that Mary’s million dollar gold coin collection was a terrible temptation (see Gloria Sykes affidavit on file with the IaRDC) but the exploitation and dehumanization of Mary Sykes is so despicable that the Court should sua sponte revoke the law licenses of every one of the attorneys who had a part in the criminal enterprises of guardianship abuse reported on the MARYGSYKES blog.   (The MaryGSykes blog was referred to as being akin to “yelling fire in a crowded theater!” as it disclosed dishonesty in the judiciary!)   
The aforesaid Petition also addresses recently discovered addition dishonesty of the IARDC and Mr. Larkin.     The Court reporter engaged by Larkin was not licensed.   Larkin and the IARDC were well aware (or should have been aware) of the fact that they were engaging a Court Reporter who was unlicensed!    Instead of being truthful concerning the engagement of an unlicensed Court reporter, the IARDC and Larkin tried to intimidate you into silence with a claim for costs that included the fees for the non-licensed Court reporter.    Larkin knew that by statute a non-licensed court reporter could not charge for her services!
The response filed by the IARDC of course does not mention this fact nor disclose to the Supreme Court of Illinois that it appears that Jerome Larkin and his co-conspirators paid public funds in derogation of State Law.   Also not mentioned by Larkin is the fact that the testimony of Judge Stuart was altered to prevent disclosure of the fact that the Judge lied under oath as to material facts (perjury).    Also not disclosed is the fact that shortly after the perjury was disclosed by court watchers Judge Stuart resigned.    (Judge Stuart was another presiding judge in the Sykes case!)
I’ve included the President of the United States’ e-mail on this message as in order for any health care program to be successful the FRAUD element has to be removed.   The guardianship abuse which is sweeping the United States of America is a serious drain on precious funds of Medicare and other Federal Programs.   Mary Sykes’ husband was a Chicago Policeman.  Pursuant to his pension, health insurance was provided her.   Gloria Sykes complained as to charges that were literally duplicates, but the corrupt judges assigned to the Mary Sykes case, the two guardian ad litem, et al looked the other way as the maximum dollar was stolen from the designated victim and Federal and State programs.   I am calling for an HONEST and complete investigation of this elder cleansing WAR ON THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED and the cover-up, coercion and intimidation that is apparently the policy of the State of Illinois.
We have to take America back and restore the RULE OF LAW once again so that it is safe to grow old in America!
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky

 

 

From FB–White House Announces Plans to cancel Meals on Wheels for Seniors

Trump Just Announced Plan To End Funding For ‘Meals On Wheels’ For Seniors

Welcome to the New World Order.  Every person is out for themselves and the safety nets fly away.  Seniors are now to work until they keel over, even if that means work until age 110 years of age.

Throughout his campaign for president and since his election, DT has promised to reduce the size of government, cut taxes, eliminate regulations and slash numerous social programs, even as he boosts defense spending by billions.

His recently released budget proposal makes it clear he’s going to follow through on those threats.

One popular program facing elimination is “Meals On Wheels,” which uses federal funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to mobilize volunteers, businesses and donors to provide nutrition to thousands of senior citizens on a daily basis. It supports over 5,000 community-based organizations across America, reaching people in both urban and rural areas.

The money for Meals On Wheels is part of the Older American Act, first passed in 1965 as part of LBJ’s Great Society, and endorsed by every president until DT. The total cost, which includes other programs, is about $2 billion a year, which is less than the government hands out in fossil fuel subsidies every year.

Meals On Wheels alone costs about $3 million a year, which is the cost of just one trip to Trump’s “winter White House.”

On top of that, Trump’s proposed budget would “drastically reduce” the budget of the Food For Peace program, a State Department program that distributes desperately needed food supplies to areas across the globe that have been hit by famine or natural disaster. Since its creation in 1954 by President Eisenhower, it has helped feed more than 3 billion people.

It too has a budget that barely scratches $2 billion dollars – a drop in the bucket compared to the $54 billion that DT is planning to pour into the military budget.

Overall, the entire State Department budget also faces the ax, with a proposal to cut the $50 billion budget by almost one-third. It could have been worse, but Secretary of State Rex Tillerson made a plea to ease the cuts, which in an earlier version were at a staggering 37 percent.

The needless cuts to critically important programs like Meals on Wheels and Food For Peace are literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry people. The State Department’s work around the world helps millions of people and builds much-needed goodwill for America’s international reputation, which has been dragged through the mud by DT’s abrasive isolationism.

Luckily, there was immediately Republican opposition to many of the proposed cuts. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky says his party will not go along with the massive cuts to the State Department budget. Among the cuts, he said Republicans will oppose cuts in funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Elderly people voted overwhelmingly for President Trump – and this is how he’s choosing to repay them. In 2014, 10.2 million American seniors faced the risk of hunger – a staggering 15% of all elder Americans. DT needs to be pouring money into “Meals On Wheels,” not taking an axe to it.

It is absolutely appalling that in the richest nation in the world, our seniors cannot live their golden years without worrying where their next meal is coming from. DT’s budget priorities tell you all you need to know about how he really feels about the struggles of the American people.

DT has made it clear once and for all that he cares nothing for the American people who are unlikely to ever dine with him at Mar-A-Lago and is willing to send millions of the most vulnerable into food insecurity and poverty just so that he can funnel the public’s money into the pockets of defense contractors and the ultrawealthy.

From Eliot Bernstein–yet another Gship horror story — Dizenso in Conn.

How does gship slavery happen, sooo many different ways to enslave, strip of all assets and kill the elderly.

This article is at:  http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/JulietteFairley/American-Slavery-Probate-Court/2016/04/05/id/722405/

 

Marcia DiZenzo was only 46 years old when she says she fell ill and was admitted to a hospital in downtown Jacksonville, Florida. That was some four years ago and DiZenzo was never returned to her rented condo near the beach.

Instead, she says she walked out as a ward of the state of Florida under the command of a professional guardian.

“I didn’t have health insurance at the time and somebody filed an emergency guardianship petition with the local court while I was hospitalized,” said DiZenzo who moved to Florida from Connecticut for the sunny climate.

DiZenzo is among the 58% of Americans who became wards of the state based on a probate court order of emergency temporary guardianship, according to the Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship (AAAPG), an advocacy organization in Florida.

“Probate courts in America have a sordid history,” said Dr. Sam Sugar, founder of the AAAPG in Miami. “They were the primary mechanism for dealing with legal issues in the slave trade until slavery was abolished in 1865. These equity courts committed and continue to commit egregious abuse against the most vulnerable in society.”

When slavery was legal in the U.S., bounty hunters would travel across state lines to reclaim runaway slaves while slave masters thought nothing of heartlessly alienating children from their parents by selling them off to other slave owners. Although DiZenzo is of Italian-American and not African-American descent, she says her family experienced something different but very similar.

“My dad was successful in relocating me back to South Port, Connecticut but the guardian followed us and threatened to charge him with kidnapping if I was not extradited back to Florida,” said DiZenzo of her 86 year old father who has since passed away.

Hiring a personal attorney to fend off an emergency temporary guardianship requires a considerable amount of money, which DiZenzo didn’t access fast enough while she was sick.

“When I called the bank to inquire about my bank account, customer service refused to disclose any information,” she said.

That’s because once under guardianship an individual becomes a ward of the state and loses all rights, even financial ones.

“A guardian has the power to help themselves to the assets of wards without any oversight,” Sugar told Newsmax Finance. “The guardian’s power is total and cannot easily be challenged. They are lord and master over that person’s life, assets and existence and in some cases guardians buy and sell wards to one another.”

Court appointed attorneys are mandatory for people who find themselves entangled in guardianship proceedings depending on the state.

“The legislature in Texas is concerned with ensuring that a proposed ward is represented by an attorney who has special experience in handling guardianship matters,” said Don Ford, an attorney and partner with Ford + Bergner, a boutique law firm that specializes in litigating and appealing guardianship cases across the state.

“In determining whether you want to rely on the court-appointed attorney or instead choose a privately-retained attorney, if possible, the proposed ward should carefully consider the quality and expertise of the lawyer and also the facts of the particular case.”

In Harris County, a retired nurse named Doris Davis was reportedly admitted to a hospital emergency room after experiencing a reaction to new medication.

There, a psychiatrist deemed Davis incapacitated and the 87 year old subsequently became a ward of the state under the county’s guardianship program, according to Monica Shaw, a distant relative of Davis who works as an assistant at a law firm.

“It’s my understanding that she was overly medicated, not allowed to call family or friends and was transferred to a retirement home from the hospital against her will,” Shaw told Newsmax.

“She had several bank accounts and CDs that have since been liquidated and the county guardianship program sold her house, which is awaiting approval from Judge Mike Wood who has authorized the county guardianship program to spend $6,500 a month from her estate.” Judge Wood declined to comment because he told Newsmax that the case is pending.

In response to circumstances like Davis and DiZenzo, Glynnis Walker Anderson is organizing a movement called Gray Rights.

“Aging women are the most vulnerable but entire families are affected,” said Anderson who wrote the book “Stealing Joy: A True Story of Alzheimer’s, Elder Abuse and Fraud.” “Relatives, spouses, children and grand-children, employees and the community at large are also impacted.”

Still in Florida, miles away from her Connecticut family of origin, DiZenzo has adjusted to life in the American South but believes she has lost her inheritance.

“The sale of my parent’s home was to be split four ways between me and my three siblings,” Dizenzo said. “I was supposed to get $120,000. I haven’t seen a penny.”

From Ken Ditkowsky on Pena Rodreiguez v. Colorado–Serious Misconduct will not be tolerated

You can find the case here:

Click to access 15-606_886b.pdf

Most important quotes

A Colorado jury convicted petitioner Peña-Rodriguez of harassment and unlawful sexual contact. Following the discharge of the jury, two jurors told defense counsel that, during deliberations, Juror H. C. had expressed anti-Hispanic bias toward petitioner and petitioner’s alibi witness. Counsel, with the trial court’s supervision, obtained affidavits from the two jurors describing a number of biased statements by H. C. The court acknowledged H. C.’s apparent bias but denied petitioner’s motion for a new trial on the ground that Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) generally prohibits a juror from testifying as to statements made during deliberations in a proceeding inquiring into the validity of the verdict. The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed, agreeing that H. C.’s alleged statements did not fall within an exception to Rule 606(b). The Colorado Supreme Court also affirmed, relying on Tanner v. United States, 483 U. S. 107, and Warger v. Shauers, 574 U. S. ___, both of which rejected constitutional challenges to the federal no-impeachment rule as applied to evidence of juror misconduct or bias. Held: Where a juror makes a clear statement indicating that he or she relied on racial stereotypes or animus to convict a criminal defendant, the Sixth Amendment requires that the no-impeachment rule give way in order to permit the trial court to consider the evidence of the juror’s statement and any resulting denial of the jury trial guarantee. Pp. 6–21. (a) At common law jurors were forbidden to impeach their verdict, either by affidavit or live testimony. Some American jurisdictions adopted a more flexible version of the no-impeachment bar, known as the “Iowa rule,” which prevented jurors from testifying only about their own subjective beliefs, thoughts, or motives during deliberations. An alternative approach, later referred to as the federal approach, permitted an exception only for events extraneous to the deliberative process. This Court’s early decisions did not establish a clear preference for a particular version of the no-impeachment rule, appearing open to the Iowa rule in United States v. Reid, 12 How. 361, and Mattox v. United States, 146 U. S. 140, but rejecting that approach in McDonald v. Pless, 238 U. S. 264. The common-law development of the rule reached a milestone in 1975 when Congress adopted Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which sets out a broad no-impeachment rule, with only limited exceptions. This version of the no-impeachment rule has substantial merit, promoting full and vigorous discussion by jurors and providing considerable assurance that after being discharged they will not be summoned to recount their deliberations or otherwise harassed. The rule gives stability and finality to verdicts. Pp. 6–9. (b) Some version of the no-impeachment rule is followed in every State and the District of Columbia, most of which follow the Federal Rule. At least 16 jurisdictions have recognized an exception for juror testimony about racial bias in deliberations. Three Federal Courts of Appeals have also held or suggested there is a constitutional exception for evidence of racial bias. In addressing the common-law no-impeachment rule, this Court noted the possibility of an exception in the “gravest and most important cases.” United States v. Reid, supra, at 366; McDonald v. Pless, supra, at 269. The Court has addressed the question whether the Constitution mandates an exception to Rule 606(b) just twice, rejecting an exception each time. In Tanner, where the evidence showed that some jurors were under the influence of drugs and alcohol during the trial, the Court identified “long-recognized and very substantial concerns” supporting the no-impeachment rule. 483 U. S., at 127. The Court also outlined existing, significant safeguards for the defendant’s right to an impartial and competent jury beyond post-trial juror testimony: members of the venire can be examined for impartiality during voir dire; juror misconduct may be observed the court, counsel, and court personnel during the trial; and jurors themselves can report misconduct to the court before a verdict is rendered. In Warger, a civil case where the evidence indicated that the jury forewoman failed to disclose a prodefendant bias during voir dire, the Court again put substantial reliance on existing safeguards for a fair trial. But the Court also warned, as in Reid and McDonald, that the no-impeachment rule may admit of exceptions for “juror bias so extreme that, almost by definition, the jury trial right has been abridged.” 574 U. S., at ___–___, n. 3.

The Court has interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit the exclusion of jurors based on race, Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 303, 305–309; struck down laws and practices that systematically exclude racial minorities from juries, see, e.g., Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370; ruled that no litigant may exclude a prospective juror based on race, see, e.g., Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79; and held that defendants may at times be entitled to ask about racial bias during voir dire, see, e.g., Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U. S. 524. The unmistakable principle of these precedents is that discrimination on the basis of race, “odious in all aspects, is especially pernicious in the administration of justice,” Rose v. Mitchell, 443 U. S. 545, 555, damaging “both the fact and the perception” of the jury’s role as “a vital check against the wrongful exercise of power by the State,” Powers v. Ohio, 499 U. S. 400, 411. Pp. 13–15. (d) This case lies at the intersection of the Court’s decisions endorsing the no-impeachment rule and those seeking to eliminate racial bias in the jury system.

Racial bias, unlike the behavior in McDonald, Tanner, or Warger, implicates unique historical, constitutional, and institutional concerns and, if left unaddressed, would risk systemic injury to the administration of justice.

This case is important because it illustrates the fact that SCOTUS is still pushing the integrity of the US judicial system–at the same time many of us are seeing the integrity degrade more than ever before. (Taking bags of cash to the DNC chairman to get elected or appointed to a judge’s position).

From Ken Ditkowsky:

It is my impression that this case is a bit like the Free Speech cases such as CITIZEN’S UNITED.    This is mile maker telling the Court that FAIRNESS is the goal and form does not trump substance.   Pena – Rodriquez may be the banner of the Judicialmisconduct group, as it essentially holds that judicial misconduct cannot and will not be tolerated in America.
If you read the due process cases of the SCOTUS the are clear that all that is required is NOTICE and HEARING.    Thus, due process was granted Lanre Amu when he got notice of the fact that a hearing was to be heard (and was heard)by racially biased individuals on the subject of whether or not he was practicing law while black.   They found he was and he received not only an interim suspension but a 3 years suspension.   It was irrelevant to due process that Mr. Jerome Larkin (the administrator of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission and his henchmen all were not only biased, but either suborned or committed perjury.
The Courts are the scape goat of America, and when relief has to be purchased by outbidding the miscreants it ceases to function.

 

 

 

From Paul Abramson in California–Demand to ARDC to reverse my suspension

This is  copy of a fax Paul Abramson sent to the ARDC:

March 9th 2017
Re:13PR0001   request for reconsideration of Suspension of JoAnne Denison 
(sent by email and fax)
Dear Counselors (Smart and Opryszek)
I request you to reconsider the suspension of attorney JoAnne Denison which I believe was a wrongful conviction. Ms. Denison is a citizen of the United States of America and has the First Amendment right  of free speech to voice her opinion (in this instance judicial corruption in Illinois).
She is a tireless advocate of the unfortunate victims of the Illinois Judicial system which also in my opinion is a swamp that needs to be drained. The little guy seeking justice in your state does not stand a chance. That is why we need more people like Ms. Denison who not only should be exonerated of all the ARDC charges against her but commended for the work that she does to try and get justice served for those that need it most in this world.
Respectfully Submitted
Paul Abramson
Glendale CA
From Joanne:
Thanks so much Paul for doing this.

Fundraiser on Sunday 2 to 4 pm 5940 W. Touhy, #120–Justice4 Every1, NFP

On Sunday from 2 to 4 pm we will be holding our first in office fund raise and selling raffle tickets, drinks (wine) and providing free cheese and crackers from Whole Foods (healthy and all natural).

I will have printed out my famous “list of supplements” that will keep you healthy and energetic during your unfair court room battles.  You all need the stamina and have no time to be sick.

I will have a number of beautiful handmade quilted art wall hanging for a donation too.

Drinks will be $5 and you will purchase a ticket for each glass of wine.  Please come and donate a hot dish, salad, dessert, bottle of wine and buy a raffle ticket. All leftover food will be donated to Pacific Garden Mission on the near South Side.  We will hold the drawing during a  fundraiser and have one of our court room crime victims pull the ticket by doing a drawing for that too! Winners need not be present.  You can text or email for a ticket, pay by paypal or chase quick pay or text a check and you will get a numbered receipt and a copy will be put in the drawing.  Raffle Tickets are $20 each.

We need ro raise money for fees, transcripts, rent, phones, etc.  I do your work in filing complaints to the authorities without pay.  We help people and I have a staff of many attorneys and paralegals who also work without pay, and I can’t even disclose their names, they are afraid of the ARDC as corrupt as it is, so we need to keep the underground network going to fight crime and these strings of felonies in the courts.

Join me on Sunday and I’ll answer your corruption questions and we’ll have a great time.

Joanne

PS–please, no one from the ARDC or corrupt authorities.  If I don’t know you, your ID will be checked at the door.  If I don’t know you, please email me in advance with your name and address so I can check you out.  We want my office to be a safe place for court crime victims.

From JL–Court orders are voidable if Opposing Counsel has not filed an appearance or Leave to File an Appearance

Click to access 1112401.pdf

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
Springfield, Illinois | http://www.iadtc.org | 800-232-0169
IDC Quarterly | Volume 23, Number 1 (23.1.36)
Civil Practice and Procedure
By: Edward K. Grassé
Busse, Busse & Grassé, Chicago
Leave to File an Appearance?
Yes, it is Required.
A recent Illinois Appellate Court First District decision has found that leave of court is required to file an appearance if 30 days has lapsed since service was perfected, and this is true even if the appearance is an additional appearance for a party already having appeared.
In J.P. Morgan Mortg. Acquisition Corp. v. Straus, 2012 IL App (1st) 112401, an attorney
attempted to vacate an order of foreclosure which had been entered against his clients after the attorney had filed an appearance for his clients. The court reviewed the order of foreclosure and sale and found that since the attorney had not sought leave of court to file his appearance, notice to the mortgagors was sufficient to validate the foreclosure order. J.P. Morgan had issued a mortgage to Joseph Straus and his wife, Alice. J.P. Morgan obtained service of process on both Joseph and Alice.
Joseph Straus filed a pro se appearance and answer. Subsequently, an attorney filed an ”additional appearance” on behalf of Joseph Straus and then a short time later an appearance for Alice Straus.  There was no dispute that the attorney’s additional appearance was in fact filed with the court. There was a dispute as to whether or not the additional appearance was served on opposing counsel. It was undisputed that the only appearance filed within 30 days of service was the pro se appearance filed by
Mr. Straus. J.P. Morgan, 2012 IL App (1st) 112401, ¶¶ 3-4.
After filing the additional appearance for Mr. Straus but before the appearance was filed for Mrs. Straus, J.P. Morgan filed and presented a motion for judgment of foreclosure and sale. This motion was purportedly served on Mr. and Mrs. Straus, but was admittedly not served on counsel for Mr. Straus. The court granted the motion for foreclosure and sale. The judicial sale was held and a motion was filed for approval of the judicial sale. Id. ¶ 6. Counsel for Mr. Straus filed a motion to vacate the judgment based on the fact that he was not served with notice of the motion pursuant to the additional appearance that he previously filed. J.P. Morgan argued that the additional appearance was never
served and that leave was never obtained to file the appearance in the first place. The trial court denied the motion to vacate and approved the judicial sale. Id.
On appeal, defendants asserted a single issue: that the trial court erred in denying the motion to vacate as the foreclosure judgment and all subsequent orders were void for lack of complete notice.
Defendants pointed to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 11 which states “[i]f a party is represented by an attorney of record, service shall be made upon the attorney. Otherwise service “shall” be made upon the party.” J.P. Morgan, 2012 IL App (1st) 112401, ¶ 7. Defendants argued that the use of the word “shall” makes this language mandatory and that this cannot be disregarded by the court. Id.
The court first considered whether the order was considered void or voidable. After considering several Illinois supreme and appellate court cases, the court determined that the order was voidable, not void. The court found that it properly had jurisdiction, therefore, the order was simply voidable and only subject to direct appeal. Id. ¶ 13. Defendants also disputed plaintiff’s argument that leave was required to file an appearance. Defendants cited to Rule 13 which states “[a]n attorney shall file
his written appearance or other pleading before he addresses the court unless he is presenting a motion for leave to appear by intervention or otherwise.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 13(c) (1) (“Rule 13(c)(1)”); J.P. Morgan, 2012 IL App (1st) 112401, ¶ 15. The court then addressed the need to seek leave prior to filing an appearance. The court analyzed Rule 13 which requires leave to file an appearance unless “presenting a motion for leave to appear by intervention or otherwise.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 13(c) (1). The court held that this language “leads us to the conclusion that leave of court must be sought prior to filing an appearance after 30 days.” J.P. Morgan, 2012 Il. App. 112401, ¶ 15. The court went on to state that “leave of court is regularly sought when an additional appearance is filed whether to replace an attorney or for a pro se defendant who has secured representation.” Id. The court concluded that the
arguments raised by the defendants did not demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Id. ¶ 14. This opinion raises several issues.
First, is leave of court truly required under Rule 13? The court makes the definitive statement that “leave of court must be sought prior to filing an appearance after 30 days.” Id. ¶ 15 (emphasis added). However, Rule 13 (c) (1) has two parts. The first part makes the filing of an appearance mandatory before addressing the court: “an attorney shall file his written appearance or other pleading before he addresses the court.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 13 (c) (1). The second part provides for situations wherein an attorney may address the court without filing an appearance: “unless he is presenting a motion for leave to appear by intervention or otherwise.” Id. The mandatory “shall” of the first part does not make the permissive of the second part correspondingly mandatory. It appears that the court could
have reached its decision in a more narrow context—limiting its ruling to situations involving additional or substitute appearances, without requiring leave of court in all instances where an appearance has not been filed within 30 days of service.
Second, does this ruling only apply in situations where an additional appearance or substitute appearance is being filed? The court seems to hold that leave is required in all instances after the passage of 30 days but the court’s reference to authority is limited to scenarios involving additional or substitute appearances. J.P. Morgan, 2012 IL App (1st) 112401, ¶ 15. Commonsense considerations would seem to dictate that additional or substitute appearances should require leave of court.
Unfortunately, the court’s ruling here ostensibly requires leave in all instances where 30 days have elapsed. It should be noted that the court based its ruling also upon the failure of the defendants to establish that their attorney’s additional appearance was properly served upon the plaintiff.
Lastly, what is the impact of failing to seek leave to file an appearance? If leave is not sought to file an appearance but an appearance is filed, is the attorney entitled to notice? Is an order entered without notice to an attorney who has filed an appearance and properly served the appearance on opposing counsel subject to a Rule 11 defense? These questions remain unanswered.
About the Author
Edward K. Grassé is a partner at the law firm of Busse, Busse & Grassé, P.C. He has practiced in the area of tort litigation for over 10 years and concentrates his practice in the defense of personal injury, construction, fire and explosion and premises liability suits.
He is presently the co-chair of the IDC Civil Practice Committee and is a former chair of the Civil Practice and Procedure Committee of the Chicago Bar Association.
About the IDC The Illinois Association Defense Trial Counsel (IDC) is the premier association of attorneys in Illinois who devote a substantial portion their practice to the representation of business, corporate, insurance, professional and other individual defendants in civil litigation. For more information on the IDC, visit us on the web at http://www.iadtc.org.

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel, PO Box 588, Rochester, IL 62563-0588, 217-498-2649, 800-232-0169, idc@iadtc.org

From Facebook–April Parks, “professional guardian” in Nevada indicted on over 200 charges of bilking and over billing clients

Joanne M Denison's avatarMaryGSykes.com

Grand jury indicts Nevada guardian on more than 200 charges, including racketeering, theft and exploitation

View original post 1,077 more words

From Facebook–April Parks, “professional guardian” in Nevada indicted on over 200 charges of bilking and over billing clients

Grand jury indicts Nevada guardian on more than 200 charges, including racketeering, theft and exploitation

As a guardian, April Parks was tasked with caring for the elderly and infirm in Southern Nevada.

As a guardian, she had full control over those people’s finances, their property and nearly every aspect of their lives.

ADVERTISING

And as a guardian, Parks exploited at least 150 of those vulnerable Nevadans and “systemically bilked them out of their life savings,” law enforcement officials said Wednesday.

A Clark County grand jury indicted Parks on more than 200 felony charges that include racketeering, theft, exploitation and perjury. Parks and her husband were arrested in Pennsylvania just hours after the indictment came down. It was unclear Wednesday night what agency made the arrests.

Three other people were indicted Wednesday: Parks’ business partner, Mark Simmons; her husband, Gary Neal Taylor; and her former attorney, Noel Simpson Palmer. Simmons was arrested in Indiana sometime Wednesday, according to a Metropolitan Police Department press release.

But Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson made it clear in a press conference that Parks “was the No. 1 target in this investigation.”

The 123-page indictment, which laid out the 212 felony charges levied against Parks, claimed she used her position and her company, A Private Professional Guardian, LLC, “to steal funds belonging to elderly and disabled persons over whom they had guardianship authority.”

The indictment said that Parks used fraudulent billing practices, and that Parks and Simmons organized and directed a “criminal syndicate” while stealing roughly $559,000 from 150 victims between 2011 and 2016. Most of those victims, Wolfson said, are no longer alive.

Simmons faces 134 felonies similar to the charges levied against Parks. Taylor faces seven charges, and Simpson was charged with one count each of theft and filing a false document.

Judge Jennifer Togliatti issued a no-bail arrest warrant for Parks and Simmons and set the bail at $200,000 for Taylor. Palmer, who appeared at the hearing, agreed to pay $7,500 for bail and to return to court March 22.

Parks was one of the most active private professional guardians in Southern Nevada. She often acted as the surrogate decision maker for 50 to 100 elderly and mentally incapacitated people, called wards, at a given time. As the guardian, Parks had full control of the wards’ finances, estates and even medical decisions.

Last year, Parks left Nevada, leaving dozens of wards behind and forcing the already-overburdened Clark County public guardian’s office to step in to care for them. Guardianship Judge Cynthia Dianne Steele issued a separate bench warrant for Parks’ arrest last summer after Parks failed twice to appear in court for one of the cases she abandoned. Attorneys claimed Parks grossly overbilled her wards, and they called for a law enforcement investigation of her practices.

One of Parks’ former wards, Rudy North, said he never expected these charges to come.

North, 80, and his wife, Rennie, spent two years under Parks’ guardianship.

The indictment claims Parks stole $1,300 from the couple through overbilling, but North said the impact was much larger and went beyond finances.

North said the couple was taken from their home and put into an assisted living facility in Boulder City. Parks sold nearly all their possessions shortly after moving the couple, North claimed.

He compared being taken away from their home and family to his experience living in Auschwitz, the World War II Nazi concentration camp for Jews.

“We were taken without announcement, without the ability to make a phone call,” North said. “The only thing we beat them on, really, is we’re alive today.”

The indictment and arrests mark a newfound focus from law enforcement at the state and local levels to protect the elderly and mentally incapacitated from fraud and abuse by those who are supposed to care for them.

In the past, law enforcement rarely investigated guardianship abuses, because they were seen as either a court or civil issue. But a new 10-person unit inside the attorney general’s office and a joint task force between that office and local agencies have given law enforcement the needed teeth to dig into the abuses committed because of those failures.

“There are failures in our community in how we’ve dealt with this issue,” Wolfson said.

At the court level, an overburdened system and a lack of oversight left these wards vulnerable to exploitation. A Las Vegas Review-Journal series published in April 2015 detailed those shortfalls.

In response to the series, the Nevada Supreme Court formed a commission of lawmakers, lawyers and advocates with the goal of fixing those problems.

The panel last fall made several recommendations, including ensuring every ward has the right to an attorney and adding significant oversight and accountability to the guardianship process.

The investigation was a joint effort of Metro and the attorney general’s and district attorney’s offices. Wolfson said other cases of guardianship abuse are pending, but he did not detail those cases or give a timeline for when charges could come.

Parks is expected to be extradited to Las Vegas for the trial.

Contact Colton Lochhead at clochhead@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4638. Follow @ColtonLochhead on Twitter.

April Parks’s 212 felony charges:

1 count of racketeering

42 counts of theft

37 counts of exploitation of an older person or vulnerable person

74 counts offering a false instrument for filing of record

58 counts of perjury.

From Ken Ditkowsky–On how the ARDC protected Seth Gillman, a favored, but felonious, Illinois attorney

From the Chicago Tribune:

Hospice Owner Seeks Light Sentence For $9M Medicare Fraud

Law360, New York (February 14, 2017, 6:06 PM EST) — The former owner of a hospice care center who pled guilty to involvement in a $9 million Medicare fraud scheme asked an Illinois federal judge Monday for the lightest allowable sentence, presumably much less than the 10 years the government wants him to spend behind bars.
Seth Gillman, a lawyer and one of the founders of now-bankrupt Passages Hospice LLC, did not specify how long his impending sentence should be, only saying that it should be “the shortest term of imprisonment permissible under the law.”
In support of his effort to shave years off the time he could spend in prison, he objected to two aspects of the government’s recommended sentence, described his good deeds, and noted how he has lost his business, his friends and his family as a result of his crime.
“Gillman now comes before this court extraordinarily humble and contrite. He is deeply ashamed and angered with himself for succumbing to criminal conduct,” his sentencing memorandum said. “With exception to certain decisions and transgressions that have landed him before this court, Gillman has committed his life to helping his family, friends and others in need, illustrating his genuine sense of compassion and generosity.”
The government, meanwhile, pushed for 10 years, pointing to Gillman’s role in overseeing a four-year-long fraud scheme in which Medicare was charged millions of dollars for unnecessary nurse visits and for care that patients ultimately didn’t receive — a scam he continued even as multiple members of his staff tried to change the practices.
Over the life of the scheme, Medicare paid Passages about $26.5 million for “basically nothing” because little, if any, of it went to patient care, prosecutors said.
“Unlike some defendants that come before this court and others, this defendant clearly could have had a good career and living without engaging in criminal activity, and he made a deliberate choice based on greed to put all of that at risk by defrauding Medicare,” the government said. “He chose to do this because he thought he could get away with it, and a serious sentence is necessary to punish him adequately.”
Law enforcement searched Passages’ offices in January 2012, and Gillman  was indicted in May 2014 along with three other Passages employees. He  pled guilty in February 2016.
Gillman had numerous opportunities during the life of the scheme to make things right, but “nothing changed, and the scheme went on,” the government said.
His actions included firing a nursing director who raised multiple concerns soon after the plot began in 2008, actively changing patient files in 2009, and asking a co-defendant in 2010 if an employee in the Chicago region was a “cancer” after that worker questioned how staff could be a “family” if they were swamped with work, unable to voice concerns without feeling threatened and pressured to keep a certain amount of people on “general inpatient” services — a higher level of care that pulled in higher reimbursements — the government said.
Gillman will be the first sentenced as a result of the scheme, so the court should consider his role as head of Passages, the length of the scheme, and the need to set a solid standard on which to base subsequent sentences, the government said. It has recommended 60 and 40 months for two other defendants.
Gillman did not deny the seriousness of his offense, but objected to two aspects of the government’s recommendation that increased his sentence. Both sides agree that the scheme caused $9 million in losses — which the defendants should be required to pay back — but Gillman said that his sentence shouldn’t be lengthened as a result of it being a federal health care offense or because he allegedly abused a position of trust.
Although he agreed to follow Medicare’s rules, the government would have needed to establish a relationship that’s beyond ordinary for him to have abused its trust, he said. As for the federal health care offense enhancement, the scheme was three months from ending before this enhancement went into effect, so it shouldn’t apply, Gillman said.
With his objections, the government’s recommended sentence would drop from 120 months to between 70 and 87 months. But the Probation Department, a neutral third party, has recommended that a 36-month sentence would be sufficient, Gillman said, adding that he isn’t suggesting this is an appropriate length, but that the court should consider this fact.
Gillman also said that Passages provided hundreds of elderly patients extra care and assistance that nursing homes didn’t provide, even while he, through Passages, “unjustly lined his pockets by submitting false claims.”
“Despite his illegal conduct, the fact that hundreds of elderly patients received far better care than they qualified for should not be overlooked,” his sentencing memorandum said. “The true nature of this specific offense is that Gillman improperly profited off the Passages patients who received extensive end-of-life care that, under Medicare guidelines, they were not qualified to receive.”
Also on Monday, the government filed a short sentencing memorandum for Passages itself, which pled guilty in February 2016. Although a large fine would ordinarily be warranted, the bankrupt company isn’t likely to be able to pay such a penalty, so no fine should be imposed, the government said, recommending two years of probation.
Gillman is represented by Blaire C. Dalton of Dalton Law LLC and by Edward M. Genson and Vadim A. Glozman of Edward M. Genson & Associates.
The government is represented by U.S. Attorney Zachary T. Fardon and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Stephen Chahn Lee, Abigail Peluso and James P. Durkin.
The case is USA v. Gillman, et al., case number 1:14-cr-00033, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
–Additional reporting by Diana Novak Jones. Editing by Philip Shea.
The tribune article mentioned the kickbacks that Gillman made to other nursing home operators.    Why have they not been indicted?   The ‘street’ had it that Gillman was co-operating with the Fed – was he?     Jerome Larkin acted upon the knowledge that Gillman was co-operating!   He most probably heard it from the same sources that I did!   His reaction was to try to turn the screws by disciplinary proceedings – and he did!
We need fairness in our Courts!    We also need the Courts to be administered fairly and impartially!

From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: Supreme Court Says Jury Secrecy Not Guaranteed If Racial Bias Exists

Indeed, we are dealing with a corruption that goes to the heart of the justice system.   The Court lays down a very strict rule in that there has to be a ‘clear statement.’   exactly what that means is that it will take another 100 years to have a similar case; however, the gantlet has been laid down.
In the elder cases, the statute is very clear for appointing a guardian.   Guardians should be rare as the burden set by statute is very heavy.  First proof of incompetency has to be by clear and convincing evidence and under 755 ILCS 5/11a -3 b  (and similar limitations in every statute in the USA – because of ADA) there has to be definitive proof as to specific needs to be addressed by the guardian.    As a fiduciary being a guardian is an onerous task!    The fiduciary must act in the ward’s objective best interest, and can be compensated only for the work that is reasonably in the guardians objective best interest that is reasonable and necessary.  
As every one should be aware if they actually attended some institution of learning while conscious  – objective best interest is determined by the clear light of hindsight!  
TODAY with corrupt courts we are getting too many off the wall decisions.   In Judge Maureen Connors Court lawyers heard this Judge appoint guardians without hearing a single word of testimony on a routine basis.   Ditto for some of the other Illinois Courts.    Here in Illinois we have had scandals by the dozen in which individuals totally innocent of the crime charges confessed to crimes that they could not have committed.   A little wire hooked to a electric outlet and the genitals lessens the plead of innocence!   In fact the threat itself does wonders.
Activists have suggested with a great probability of truth that a defendant who happens to have a dark skin color is more lightly to be treated to the more esoteric forms of interrogation and a quick shift by the Justice system.   Of course I have no evidence of such conduct, but if you turn to correct media outlet they will confirm the wildest accusation and double it!
A fundamental covenant of America is EQUAL and FAIR  justice, without undue delay. In Chicago such is inconvenient to too many of the Political and Judicial elite.   Thus we get cases such as the Lanre Amu DISCIPLINARY KANGAROO PROCEEDING  or a blog disclosing judicial corruption being labelled as “yelling fire in a crowded theater.”
Indeed — FAIRNESS AND HONESTY in every phase of the Judicial process is not only necessary – but essential.    It is the job of the SCOTUS to remind the great unwashed – i.e. you and me – that their decisions are not suggestions – BUT THE RULE OF LAW and as citizens we have to fight tooth and nail to protect the concept of FAIRNESS and EQUALITY BEFORE THE EYES OF THE LAW.
From Joanne;
And lest we not forget the 10,000 people who “disappeared” at Homan Ave police station since 1995.  The building is a creepy old warehouse and looks just like a place of torture for thousands.
It is said that these people were mostly poor and brown and no one would care if they disappeared.
We need an investigation.

From JP on Robert Grundstein’s wonderful book–Bad Minds, High Places

 

From Activist Post and JP:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B6FbJzwtHocwRl9DUDhTaF83UTQ?usp=sharing

New Book Exposes The Consequences Of A Politicized Judiciary

corrupt_judgeBy Janet Phelan

Book Review: Bad Minds, High Places

Try to talk to someone about how a court of law has engineered your financial ruin and, in so doing, has utterly ignored statutory and Constitutional imperatives, and it is likely that you will be met with a blank, glazed stare. After all, America has a good legal system, right? Say what you will about America’s behavior in the Middle East and that nasty little torture racket at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and goodness knows where else—America’s legal system is…well…. it is the best system there is.

Right?

A new book by Robert Grundstein, entitled Bad Minds, High Places, may dispossess you of any Disneyland notions concerning the cold reality of America’s legal system. Laced with humor and dazzlingly easy to digest explanations of convoluted legalisms, Grundstein’s book lays out a true story—his story—of how the legal system first in Ohio and then in the state of Washington retaliated against him in a nearly seamless effort to deprive him of his livelihood—the practice of law—and potentially his very freedom.

Grundstein’s story starts in year 2007, with what appears to be blowback in Ohio from some moderate activism, involving his writing an editorial about one Judge Peter Junkin. Grundstein apparently committed the unthinkable when he criticized a judge and passed out the editorial in front of an Ohio courthouse.

We follow Grundstein’s story as he is subsequently criminally charged for committing an act which he easily could have proven he was unable to commit. Robert Grundstein was not even in Ohio when the act was alleged to have occurred and had ATM receipts and more to prove his whereabouts.

As it turns out, no one cared about the evidence.

From this jumping off point, Robert Grundstein enters a landscape best detailed by Franz Kafka, or possibly depicted in the British television cult series, The Prisoner. We see judges ignoring evidence—in fact, critical evidence proving Grundstein’s innocence disappears from the record—further charges are piled on, like wobbling matchsticks on an already void foundation, as prosecutors, judges and indolent defense attorneys collude to destroy an apparently innocent man.

The fact that many of the individuals named in the book were subsequently investigated and criminally charged and imprisoned following the FBI raids in Cleveland in 2008 buttresses Grundstein’s story. Through his narrative, we meet a panoply of players, including prosecutor Joe O’Malley, imprisoned on federal criminal charges, Chief Clerk of Courts Mark Lime, subsequently Indicted on 76 counts of docket falsification, Judge Lance Mason, sentenced to 24 months for wife beating, and a slew of public officials who were forced to resign, including former prosecutor Bill Mason, former judge Lillian Greene and, yep, you got it—the judge who may have started the entire ball plummeting down the hill towards Robert Grundstein—Peter Junkin, who was removed following the FBI raids.

All told, over sixty people, including Cuyahoga county judges, prosecutors, county executives, administrators, employees and others who contracted with the county went to jail.

We also meet an array of potentially law-abiding judges and private attorneys who palpably blanch at the prospect of attending to or defending Grundstein’s rights. His narrative illuminates the unfortunate reality that all these individuals are connected through a mutual need to keep working with each other, and therefore will not cross over the invisible red line to restore a semblance of fairness to an individual with a bullseye on his back.

This is the stuff of paranoid fantasies, no? Unfortunately, the fantastic is now the real. Writes Grundstein in the epilogue to his book:

Government and organized crime are not all that different. The idea is to get something for your group at the expense of people who aren’t in it. The Jewish Holocaust can be cast as not only racism, but a planned transfer of wealth. You kill the person you’ve cheated in order to remove his voice. Andrew Jackson did it with the Cherokee Indians after gold was found in Georgia. No one is innocent.

At a time when lawyers who attempt to uphold the rule of law are disciplined, jailed, sanctioned or disbarred—Richard Fine, Don Bailey, Ken Ditkowsky, Lanre Amu, Andy Ostrowski, Grant Goodman, among others—it is heartening to see the bravery that some of these individuals are exhibiting. Ken Ditkowsky’s writings are being blogged by another attorney-under-fire, JoAnne Denison, and appear regularly at https://marygsykes.com/. After a harrowing year and a half in LA County jail, attorney Richard Fine has launched the Campaign for Judicial Integrity.

Andy Ostrowski recently made a run for a seat in the US House of Representatives and now hosts a radio show concerning justice issues.

By writing such an engaging and—frankly—disturbing account of powerful people misusing their power in shameful ways, Robert Grundstein joins a growing choir of knowledgeable voices who are declaring, in essence, the utter failure of the US legal system. Writes Grundstein,

Politics is defined as competition for resources under conditions of scarcity. It’s common for judiciaries to be politicized, especially in states where judges are elected. However, when the legal system charged with keeping your group together is politicized, it will discriminate in favor of itself at the expense of the people it’s designed to protect….There will be higher priority people in the interest group and those outside. No one will trust government or the law….

America is, in fact, simply a chunk of territory and rules governing behavior on that territory. With personal property being misappropriated through the sorts of mechanisms that Grundstein refers to in his book, and with the rules—that would be the legal system—basically a “mock-up” to serve special and powerful interests, one might well conclude that America is no longer America.

Unlike the doomsdayers, Grundstein offers suggestions to fix this broken system. In his epilogue, entitled “Solutions for a Politicized Judiciary,” he makes a number of recommendations as to how to begin to address the problem of influence peddling in state courts. His recommendations include public and comprehensive hearings for judges prior to elections, rotating judges into other jurisdictions and also thorough judicial performance reviews, based on evaluations by those appearing before the judges.

While Grundstein’s recommendations may incur a heated debate among those who see a politicized judiciary as a symptom rather than a discrete problem, I think we can all agree that this debate is long overdue.

Bad Minds, High Places demonstrates that the problem of “collusion to ruin” exceeds the general perception of how bad our legal system has actually become. This book, along with the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers and Franz Kafka’s The Trial, should be mandated reading in civics curriculums. It is only through such fearless reporting as evidenced in Bad Minds, High Places that our legal system will ever evolve into a system of liberty and justice for all.


Bad Minds, High Places is available on Amazon, along with another book by Robert Grundstein, entitled Light Nights and Wet Feet: A Walk through Modern Scotland.\

From Joanne:

I have read the book and found it excellent. If you have ever fought within a corrupt, uncaring and unkind court system that caters only to the rich, powerful and well heeled with connections, you will find solace in this book.  I greatly enjoyed reading it and Robert Grundstein I believe is an excellent writer and an attorney whose license to practice was wrongfully removed by nefarious political based motives.  So was mine, so was that of Lanre Amu and Kenneth Ditkowsky, both fine attorneys ground up like yesterday’s sausage in the carnage of a House of Bones.

We all must fight to regain our position in a land of freedom and democracy, Truth and Justice.

I know I am doing my part.

 

From Ken Ditkowsky and the US Supreme court–Jury secrecy not protected if racial bias alleged

 Fairness in our Courts is required and mandated!
Now let’s apply this to the guardianship proceedings and even traffic court!   It would be very nice have judges who have integrity by definition!   Of course this would mean that ‘cover ups’ such as are going on in Illinois and some other states by lawyer disciplinary commissions would be illegal!
They are not protected by any alleged “secrecy” or “privacy” to the Disabled Person. In any instance where corruption is involved, it is not protected by “secrecy” or “privacy”. That’s why the videos in the Mary G Sykes case are so valuable and must be protected on the internet. This woman was clearly not incompetent. Why then did the Tribunal in Joanne Denison’s case refuse to take a look at the video evidence that there was indeed corruption in the 09 P 4585 case?
Why did the ARDC tribunal refuse all discovery to both Ken Ditkowsky and Joanne Denison in their cases? Discovery is protected by the 5th amendment Due Process clause of the US Constitution.
All of these questions remain to be unanswered and become more important yet in the wake of this US Supreme Court decision.
The US people have rights and we must continue to complain vociferously until the  authorities do some and most of all, do their jobs!
The anatomy of Judicial Corruption is revealed every day in Cook County, Illinois.
Let’s start at square 1.   How do you become a Judge in Cook County?    A Chicago Tribune columnist revealed that the candidate had to get a gym bag, fill it with cash, and give it to Democratic Party official.   (a judge candidate revealed that he paid $150,000).   I am sure that there are other ways.   A District Court Judge was reported to have earned his trip to the Federal Bench by providing a well known Democratic Boss with “girls!” (This judge was named after a very famous President from Illinois whose name was NOT Obama!) 
After square 1 we go to square 2.   This lesson is taught in the Office of the Clerk of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court.   For our text, we pull out case 09 P 4585 (In re: Mary Sykes).   if you need a cheat sheet, the Illinois attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission has in its filed the EVIDENCE DEPOSITION of the presiding judge in case 09 P 4585.    She on page 91 admits that she was ‘fixed.’    Here evidence deposition reveals why case 09 P 4585 is so bizarre and Mr. Jerome Larkin, the administrator of the IaRDC, was required to perjure himself and file patently false pleadings.
Everyone knows that due process requires NOTICE and HEARING and that a guardianship is a patent invasion and forfeiture of Civil and Human Rights.   Every one also knows that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for human rights to be forfeit in the United States of America.    In fact we have serious laws on the books against such conduct.   Thus, how can such occur?    It does and occurs with great frequency.    Indeed, not only was Mary Sykes Constitutional Rights violated but she never received a hearing prior to the forfeiture!   755 ILCS 5/11a – 3b outlines the parameters of a guardianship and the Americans With Disabilities Act provides Federal sanction for violations of the criteria.    Without a hearing at which significant testimony is had the guardianship court is nothing but a criminal enterprise promulgating HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
Now let’s go back to square 1.  The cash payment by the Judge to local Democratic Party official now looms very relevant.   Why would a distinguished lawyer became a prostitute?
Now you know the answer and exactly who America has to protect!

From Ken Ditkowski –caught in the act

Subject: Re: Caught In The Act <http://bit.ly/2mB95mA> [but still being covered-up]
(link is about another attorney taking a picture of a defense attorney’s notes)
Date: Mar 4, 2017 8:14 AM
In Illinois and many States we have guardianship supervised by our Courts.   What this means is that there is an active JUDGE assigned to each guardianship who supervises the elder abuse/exploitation, and dehumanization of the elderly person.   I point to the Mary Sykes (09 P 4585) and Alice Gore cases as exhibits 1 and 2.   After the elder cleansing (i.e. isolation, abuse, exploitation, theft of savings and other assets, and denial of all human and civil rights) was completed that designated victim was subjected to involuntary suicide.   Calls for an HONEST INVESTIGATION resulted in a campaign of intimidation directed against the caller followed by a cover-up of massive proportions.   Millions of dollars of State of Illinois money (public money) was and is used in this cover=up that includes but is not limited to, fraud, and perjury by no less an public figure as the Administrator of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, Jerome Larkin.   The trail of perfidy travels right to the Supreme Court of Illinois!
The Federal courts view the criminal enterprise of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court to be untouchable and as the 2nd oldest profession is up to its eyeballs in the corruption and fraud against the elderly and their families it has taken a pass.    In fact, even though we have the red letter indictment of Philip Esformes in South Florida for stealing a billion dollars from MEDICARE and the Seth Gillman in Illinois the victims have been literally check mated by the ‘COVER UP!’   The Alice Gore case takes a page out of the 3rd Reich!    The Court appointed Guardian ad Litem orchestrated the salvaging of the gold from the teeth of the victim!
Mr. Larkin of the IARDC not only saw nothing wrong with Nazi era activity being promulgated under the supervision of a Circuit Court judge, but was totally unsympathic with the family, complaining attorneys, and common members of the ‘great unwashed!’   In fact he wrote (through one of his overpaid attorneys at the IARDC – under his signature) that the blog (MaryGSykes) exposing this type of corruption was akin to “ yelling fire in a crowded theater!” and asked for the attorney exposing the corruption receive an interim suspension.   The Illinois Supreme Court did exactly that!
In Florida, the Court was equally perfidious.   In one guardianship the guardian ran into resistance from the wife of the victim.   No problem – the judge entered an order annulling the marriage.   In another case, a complaining lawyer was jailed.   Release from jail was reportedly secretly conditioned on the lawyer giving up her First Amendment Rights and ignoring her duty pursuant to Rule 8.3.
The criminal law applies to these cases of guardianship abuse.  The common law (and its statutory counterparts) of fiduciary law apply also to this CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and War on the Elderly and the Disabled but the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION and our State and Federal Government have virtually ignored their responsibility except in some rare situations.    The Philip Esformes situation is most important.   The Federal Grand Jury indicted Esformes in Florida for stealing a billion dollars from Medicare; however, here in Chicago it is apparent that the very same activity has been going on for years and Esformes and his cohorts not only are given a pass, but protection.   The Alice Gore case has a nexus to the Esformes nursing homes!    These miscreants actually bragged that the elderly were a commodity!    Alice Gore, Mary Sykes, Caroly Wyman **** indeed were commodities.   These commodities openly are voted for by the dominant nursing home operators and keep in power the corrupt political and judicial elite.
So blantant is the cover-up that Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court are not ashamed of their conduct – -Larkin is reported to teach legal ethics!   The Gillman lawyer disciplinary  case stands as a monument to the type of legal ethics that is now standard.   The USA indicted Gillman for fiduciary fraud and for theft from Federal Health care programs.   The indictment did not “move” the Illinois attorney disciplinary commission (IARDC) or the Illinois Supreme Court.   No disciplinary proceedings were filed even though lawyers wrote to Mr. Larkin suggesting that the public needed protection.   Larkin resisted until the hue and cry rose to a fevor pitch and Gillman pleaded guilty.  Reluctant proceedings were finally filed and languished.    (Mr. Gillman, unlike Mr. Amu is not black and not complaining about judicial corruption).    A call to action occurred when Larkin was informed that Gillman was corrupting with the United States of America IN ITS INVESTIGATIONS!    Almost immediately a Petition for a interim suspension was applied for and granted.    The lesson IS clear – in Illinois it is in the highest traditions of the BAR to breach your fidiciary relationship and oath as an attorney – but it is ethically challenged for an attorney to directly or indirectly cooperate with LAW ENFORCEMENT or expose corruption by judicial or political figures! 
The American Bar Association and the political elite are weak on enforcement.    More legislation is interesting but irrelevant if not followed up by vigorous and honest prosecution.    The President of the United States wants to provide an efficacious health system but cannot do so without vigorous enforcement of the Rights, privileges and Immunities of elderly!    The Philip Esformes indictment points out that billions of dollars are available to be stolen and Jerome Larkin has demonstrated here in Illinois that no stone will be left unturned by the Establishment to steal every loose dollar.
Morris Esformes in the Alice Gore case was allegedly asked – how can you do something so terrible.   His answer was: “because I can!”    Indeed without vigorous enforcement of the law and the disbarrment of criminals wearing black robes this encouragement is another will of the wisp!

From CNN/Facebook–Rapes and Sexual Abuse in US nursing homes

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/02/health/nursing-home-sex-abuse-investigation/?iid=ob_lockedrail_bottomlarge

Some of the victims can’t speak. They rely on walkers and wheelchairs to leave their beds. They have been robbed of their memories. They come to nursing homes to be cared for.

Instead, they are sexually assaulted.

A CNN INVESTIGATION

Six women. Three nursing homes. And the man accused of rape and abuse

Luis Gomez appeared to many to be the perfect nursing aide. He loved his job and went the distance for residents in his care. But now a different image has emerged: Gomez, who insists he is innocent, is accused of being a serial abuser — moving from facility to facility despite a history of allegations against him. CNN documents his trail.

OPINION

My mother was raped at 88

A daughter describes the resilience that helped her family not only heal but fight for reform.

The unthinkable is happening at facilities throughout the country: Vulnerable seniors are being raped and sexually abused by the very people paid to care for them.

It’s impossible to know just how many victims are out there. But through an exclusive analysis of state and federal data and interviews with experts, regulators and the families of victims, CNN has found that this little-discussed issue is more widespread than anyone would imagine.

Even more disturbing: In many cases, nursing homes and the government officials who oversee them are doing little — or nothing — to stop it.

Sometimes pure — and even willful — negligence is at work. In other instances, nursing home employees and administrators are hamstrung in their efforts to protect victims who can’t remember exactly what happened to them or even identify their perpetrators.

In cases reviewed by CNN, victims and their families were failed at every stage. Nursing homes were slow to investigate and report allegations because of a reluctance to believe the accusations — or a desire to hide them. Police viewed the claims as unlikely at the outset, dismissing potential victims because of failing memories or jumbled allegations. And because of the high bar set for substantiating abuse, state regulators failed to flag patterns of repeated allegations against a single caregiver.

It’s these systemic failures that make it especially hard for victims to get justice — and even easier for perpetrators to get away with their crimes.

“At 83 years old, unable to speak, unable to fight back, she was even more vulnerable than she was as a little girl fleeing her homeland. In fact, she was as vulnerable as an infant when she was raped. The dignity which she always displayed during her life, which was already being assaulted so unrelentingly by Alzheimer’s disease, was dealt a final devastating blow by this man. The horrific irony is not lost upon me … that the very thing she feared most as a young girl fleeing her homeland happened to her in the final, most vulnerable days of her life.”

Sonja Fischer is shown here in earlier days. She is pictured at top of this story during the last years of her life, with her daughter Maya’s haunting quote.

Maya Fischer made this statement in court at the 2015 sentencing of a nursing assistant convicted of raping her mother. Choking back tears, Fischer detailed her mother’s story — recounting how she had fled Indonesia as a youth with her family to escape the rape and killing of young girls by Japanese soldiers, only to fall victim decades later to a man whose job was to care for her.

A fellow caregiver saw male nursing assistant George Kpingbah in 83-year-old Sonja Fischer’s room at 4:30 a.m. on December 18, 2014, at the Walker Methodist Health Center in Minneapolis. A bare leg was on each side of his hips, and her adult diaper lay open on the bed. When the witness noticed the 76-year-old aide thrusting back and forth, she said she knew a sexual assault was occurring.

Kpingbah ultimately pleaded guilty to third-degree criminal sexual conduct with a mentally impaired or helpless victim and was sentenced to eight years in prison. In an emotional statement directed at Kpingbah during sentencing, the judge told him he had done more than ravage the lives of his victim and her family. He had betrayed the public trust granted to caregivers who have such intimate access to the sick and elderly.

“You violated (a) position of authority, a position of trust,” Judge Elizabeth Cutter said at the sentencing hearing. “The ramifications of what you did are so far-reaching. … It also affected everyone in that facility. Everyone who stays in that facility. Everyone who works at that facility. It affects everyone who has to place a loved one in a facility.”

Kpingbah apologized at the hearing and said he planned to take his Bible with him to prison. His attorney asked for leniency. Kpingbah had endured his own personal struggles as a refugee, the attorney said, fleeing Liberia after many of his family members were killed. Kpingbah’s one “unspeakable act,” he told the judge, was completely out of character.

Yet in court documents uncovered by CNN, prosecutors revealed it wasn’t the first time Kpingbah had been investigated over sexual assault allegations. Personnel records obtained by prosecutors during the investigation and reviewed by CNN show Kpingbah was suspended three times as Walker Methodist officials investigated repeated accusations of sexual abuse at the facility, including at least two where he was the main suspect.

The earliest complaint was in 2008, when police investigated allegations he had engaged in sexual intercourse with a 65-year-old who suffered from multiple sclerosis. In another case, an 83-year-old blind and deaf woman who lived on the same wing as Fischer’s mother said she was raped multiple times — always at midnight. Police investigated her report just seven months before Fischer’s mother was assaulted. While the woman could not identify her assailant, Kpingbah was suspended by the facility along with several other male staffers who were on duty during the nights of the alleged assaults.

None of these allegations were found to be substantiated by the facility or the state. For years, Walker Methodist kept Kpingbah working on the overnight shift. Until that early morning in December 2014, when someone caught him in the act.

In that instance, the Minnesota Department of Health found that the facility acted immediately to ensure the resident’s safety and promptly removed Kpingbah. The state also noted that the facility had previously provided Kpingbah with required abuse training. As a result, the facility was not cited for any wrongdoing; only Kpingbah was held accountable for the assault.

Maya Fischer had no way of knowing about the previous allegations against Kpingbah uncovered by CNN. But she sued Kpingbah, who agreed to an unusual arrangement in which he is on the hook for a massive $15 million judgment only if he abuses again.

Walker Methodist refused to comment on the previous allegations against Kpingbah, who worked at the facility for nearly eight years, but said in a statement that it fully cooperated with authorities and that “the care and well-being of all of our residents and patients is our primary focus.”

CNN reached out to family members of other residents who earlier reported they were sexually assaulted at Walker Methodist during the time Kpingbah worked there (though he was not deemed a suspect in every case). They said the officials there were quick to dismiss the residents’ claims as hallucinations or fantasies.

What should we investigate next? Email us.

“Walker Methodist certainly failed to handle this appropriately with my mother and other residents, and there should be consequences,” said the son of the first alleged victim after learning of Kpingbah’s rape conviction from CNN.

A son of a different alleged victim, who had accused an unknown perpetrator, said he was irate he was never told that a pattern of complaints had emerged against a single caregiver. Had he known of this pattern, the son said, he would have taken his mother’s report of abuse more seriously. Instead, he trusted Walker Methodist.

The Minnesota Department of Health told CNN it is barred by state law from releasing the identity of anyone investigated over an allegation that has not been substantiated, regardless of the number of allegations.

But both family members of these two alleged sexual assault victims also questioned the state health department. How effective is its oversight if it was aware of the multiple reports of abuse at Walker Methodist and still could not intervene?

When pressed by CNN, the agency said that the reports occurred during a time when a paper system was used and that it has been working to modernize this system in the hopes of “flagging such patterns.”

A daughter’s heartbreaking story

ABUSE AFTER ABUSE

Some accounts of alleged sexual abuse come from civil and criminal court documents filed against nursing homes, assisted living facilities and individuals who work there. Other incidents are buried in detailed reports filed by state health investigators.

A 76-pound North Carolina nursing home resident who was so cognitively impaired she required assistance with even the simplest daily tasks reported that a nursing aide, behind closed doors, pushed her head toward him and forced her to give him oral sex.

The third time a resident of a Texas nursing home was raped by a nurse, the assailant ejaculated in the victim’s mouth and on her breasts. When he left, desperate to hold on to whatever evidence she could, she spit the semen from her mouth into her bra and kept the unwashed bra for three weeks. “That’s all I have,” she later told state investigators.

In Iowa, a woman who depended on a walker to move around and couldn’t bathe herself reported that a nursing aide sexually assaulted her in the shower. But the facility never flagged this accusation to authorities because the aide had left the country.

An 88-year-old California woman who’d only had sex with one man her entire life — her husband of nearly 70 years — said she awoke in her nursing home bed with her catheter removed and her bed wet. The next thing she remembered was seeing an unknown male nursing assistant staring at her naked body. “This is why I love my job,” she remembered him saying, according to what she told police. Weeks later, the woman complained of severe vaginal pain and “oozing blisters,” and she was eventually diagnosed with incurable genital herpes. To this day, the identity of the alleged perpetrator hasn’t been determined.

And finally, in a small town in North Carolina, a nursing assistant continued working for years despite multiple reports of alleged abuse. Only after a defiant nurse reported the abuse to police was he fired and arrested. Luis Gomez, 58, is in jail awaiting trial and maintains his innocence.

Most of the cases examined by CNN involved lone actors. But in some cases, a mob mentality fueled the abuse. And it’s not just women who have been victimized.

CNN FOUND MORE THAN 1,000 NURSING HOMES HAVE BEEN CITED FOR MISHANDLING SUSPECTED CASES OF SEX ABUSE.

For months, a group of male nursing aides at a California facility abused and humiliated five male residents — taking videos and photos to share with other staff members. One victim, a 56-year-old with cerebral palsy, was paraded around naked. Another, an elderly man with paralysis who struggled to speak was pinched on his nipples and penis and forced to eat feces out of his adult diapers. He was terrified his abusers would kill him. While the aides lost their certifications, an investigation by Disability Rights California found that many of them never faced charges.

Another group of nursing aides, teenagers in Albert Lea, Minnesota, tormented at least 15 male and female residents, many of whom suffered from Alzheimer’s. The female aides struck, poked and rubbed the residents and touched their breasts. They inserted their fingers into one resident’s rectum. They rubbed the residents’ crotches and laughed. One aide pulled down her own pants and sat on a female resident’s lap — humping and groping her. “I was basically appalled by the callous disregard for human decency,” a judge later said. Two of the abusers, who were 18 at the time and convicted of disorderly conduct by a caregiver, served 42 days in jail. The other teens were tried in juvenile court and faced no jail time at all.

AN UNTRACKED ISSUE

Despite the litany of abuses detailed in government reports, there is no comprehensive, national data on how many cases of sexual abuse have been reported in facilities housing the elderly.

State health investigators examine all types of abuse reported at nursing homes and assisted living facilities, whether reported by the facilities or flagged by complaints to the state from witnesses, family members or victims. In the case of nursing homes, state officials typically conduct these investigations, as well as routine inspections, on behalf of the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which regulates the more than 15,000 facilities that receive government reimbursements that pay for many residents’ care. Both state health agencies and the federal government then use the information to rate facilities and issue financial penalties for the worst offenders.

HOW SAFE ARE YOUR ELDERLY LOVED ONES?

There’s no way to know about abuse that goes unreported. But you can look up the name of a nursing home in federal inspection data and see whether it has been cited for sexual abuse or other issues in the past three years. Here’s how:

  1. Go to the federal Nursing Home Compare website to look up facilities by name or location.
  2. On the first page of results, you will see a star rating for the facility based on factors such as staffing levels. A history of abuse or other inspection problems will typically be reflected in the “health inspection” rating.
  3. Click on the health inspection rating to see a summary of the facility’s most recent inspection.
  4. From here, click on “View all health inspections.” For details, go to a specific date and click “View full report.”
  5. From the main profile page for the facility, click on “Penalties” to see if an inspection resulted in fines or payment denials.
  6. To view older citations, download archived reports here or file a public records request here. Some states may also offer detailed information. A list of state websites is here.

CNN surveyed the health departments and other agencies that oversee long-term care facilities in all 50 states. Of the states that could provide at least some data, the responses varied widely.

Illinois, for example, said 386 allegations of sexual abuse of nursing home residents had been recorded since 2013, 201 of which involved a caretaker. Hawaii said eight allegations of sexual abuse were investigated between 2011 and 2015 — five of which involved a caregiver. And when states provided a further breakdown of how many allegations had been substantiated, the results demonstrate just how few accusations end up being proven — whether it’s because of the extreme hurdles posed by aging victims, the destruction of evidence or half-hearted investigations by facilities and regulators.

Of the 386 cases in Illinois, 59 were considered substantiated. And in Texas, 11 of 251 sexual complaints in the 2015 fiscal year were substantiated. Wisconsin said it didn’t have a single substantiated report of abuse in the last five years.

But most states could not say how frequently abuse investigations involved sexual allegations, often stating that sex abuse allegations are not categorized separately from other forms of abuse.

The federal government doesn’t specifically track all sexual allegations either.

More than 16,000 complaints of sexual abuse have been reported since 2000 in long-term care facilities (which include both nursing homes and assisted living facilities),according to federal data housed by the Administration for Community Living. But agency officials warned that this figure doesn’t capture everything — only those cases in which state long-term care ombudsmen (who act as advocates for facility residents) were somehow involved in resolving the complaints.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services lumps sexual allegations into a category that includes all kinds of abuse, such as physical or financial. The agency said this is because it takes all forms of abuse seriously. When asked by CNN, the agency conducted a specialized search using sex-related keywords. But because not every case was sexual in nature, CNN had to review each case individually to filter out any irrelevant citations.

The reports show that 226 nursing homes have been cited for failing to protect residents from instances in which sexual abuse was substantiated between 2010 and 2015. Of these cases, around 60% resulted in fines, which totaled more than $9 million — though only 16 facilities were permanently cut off from Medicare and Medicaid funding. (Because the federal government only regulates nursing homes, this analysis did not include assisted living facilities.)

But these statistics only tell a small part of the story because they fail to capture the many instances in which nursing homes have been cited for mishandling allegations of sexual abuse in other ways — ranging from botched investigations to cover-ups.

Using inspection reports filed between 2013 and 2016 and a similar sex-related keyword search, CNN conducted its own detailed analysis.

The result: CNN exclusively found that the federal government has cited more than 1,000 nursing homes for mishandling or failing to prevent alleged cases of rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse at their facilities during this period. (This includes some of the cases provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.) And nearly 100 of these facilities have been cited multiple times during the same period.

Complaints and allegations that don’t result in a citation, which the government calls a “deficiency,” aren’t included in these Medicare reports. In addition, national studies have found that a large percentage of rape victims typically never report their assaults. So these numbers likely represent only a fraction of the alleged sexual abuse incidents in nursing homes nationwide.

Want to know how we did this? Click here for information.

Of the instances examined, at least a quarter were allegedly perpetrated by aides, nurses and other staff members, while a small portion involved facility visitors (including family members) or unknown assailants. And while most citations dealt with cases of residents abusing other residents, accusations made about caregivers and other workers tended to be far more serious, involving allegations of forced intercourse, oral sex, digital penetration and other forms of sexual assault.

Follow the trail of rape allegations against a nursing assistant in the second part of our series.

The stories found in these reports range from sad to sickening.

An aide admitted to urinating in the shower while a female resident was inside it, showing her his erect penis and kissing her — then warning her not to tell anyone. A nurse overheard two aides talking about how a resident had been given a lap dance that made him ejaculate. A woman was found gagging and trying to fight off a male resident who had his penis in her mouth. Family members viewed video footage of an aide repeatedly raping their loved one, who was on feeding tubes, after hiding a camera in a stuffed animal in the room.

CNN’s analysis found that the nursing homes themselves are a large part of the problem. More than 500 facilities had been cited for failing to investigate and report allegations of sexual abuse thoroughly to authorities or for not properly screening employees for potentially abusive pasts. One nursing director told a state inspector that “if the facility reported all allegations it would be numerous and the State Agency wouldn’t want that either.”

Because of this lack of investigation or reporting, it’s hard to determine how many of the alleged cases of abuse were substantiated or resulted in criminal proceedings. But at least several hundred were confessed to by the perpetrators or observed by witnesses.

Amid the reports of sexual abuse were hundreds of stories that painted scenes of chaos:

Residents climbing into other residents’ beds and eating their food. Running wildly up and down halls. Pulling out knives and other weapons. Hallucinating about snakes coming out of heads and little boys hiding in the curtains. Urinating in wastebaskets. Drinking and doing drugs. Falling asleep in the bathtub. Stealing walkers. Choking and hitting people with fists and wheelchair parts. Escaping out windows. Drinking lotion and oven cleaner.

Such a challenging environment provides some context for how serious allegations of sexual assault could be overlooked.

AN UNCHECKED ‘EPIDEMIC’

It’s rarely talked about, but sexual assault in the very facilities tasked with caring for the elderly is hardly a new problem, with cases dating back decades.

It’s happening all over the country. In cities, the suburbs and the countryside. In nursing homes housing low-income residents on Medicaid. And in centers where people pay thousands of dollars out of their own savings to be there. They’re owned by huge corporations and regional chains but also by nonprofits and mom-and-pop small business owners.

And the issue is only becoming more pressing as the elderly population booms, with the number of Americans over age 65 projected to more than double between 2010 and 2050.

Sign up to receive updates on this and other CNN investigations

Yet the facilities that currently house more than 1 million senior citizens typically pay low wages to nursing assistants (about $11 or $12 an hour), making it difficult to attract and keep quality workers. And during the most vulnerable hours, the night shift, there are often few supervisors.

The abuse is “an epidemic,” said Mark Kosieradzki, a Minnesota attorney who has represented a number of victims and their families, including Fischer, the woman who recounted her mother’s rape in court. “Predators find elderly patients to be easy prey. Those patients often have dementia. They can’t say what happened, or are not believed because many people find it inconceivable that a 28-year-old caregiver would want to rape someone’s grandmother.”

Kosieradzki and other experts who advocate on behalf of the elderly say strong federal and state laws are in place that require abuses to be reported and investigated. The problem, they say, is that these laws are not always followed by the nursing homes. And while federal and state officials told CNN that regulators aggressively investigate complaints and hold facilities accountable, critics say their enforcement isn’t tough enough. And investigations by facility and state officials are often cursory at best, rarely going deep enough to meet a difficult burden of proof.

Many nursing home employees promptly report abusers to authorities as required by federal law and assist in the investigations. But in numerous examples of abuse uncovered by CNN, the facilities themselves have made it possible for violent rapes and sexual assaults to go unchecked.

In these facilities, allegations are routinely questioned or dismissed because victims have cognitive conditions such as Alzheimer’s. Workers often lack the specific training needed to spot sexual abuse — keeping reports of abuse from ever reaching authorities. And the reputation and safety of the facility may take priority: There’s often a fear that bringing investigators into a cash-strapped facility may expose other issues, threaten a nursing home with closure or open the door to costly lawsuits.

Most sinister of all are administrators and employees who actively impede investigations.

“There are some situations where they don’t realize it’s happened, and they don’t want to believe it. They just don’t understand it,” said Ann Burgess, a well-known nurse and Boston College nursing professor who specializes in the assessment and treatment of elderly sexual abuse victims. “There are other cases where they try to cover it up. … They blame the victim.”

At one Colorado facility, nursing aide Antonio Nieto had already been accused of raping one female resident in her bed at Broomfield Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center when an allegation emerged from another woman. Prosecutors say the facility allowed Nieto to return to work after the first alleged assault because the facility had found the woman’s claims to be “unfounded.” The facility, which has come under new management since the assaults, said it allowed Nieto to return to work only after being told the police investigation had stalled and no criminal charges were expected.

He was fired after the other victim came forward. Nieto was ultimately sentenced to 24 years to life in prison. Broomfield paid a $51,837 fine, a paltry sum in comparison with the millions it received in annual government reimbursements for patient care.

Nursing assistants Andrew Merzwski, from left, Antonio Nieto and George Kpingbah were all convicted of raping elderly residents.

When the chef at an assisted living facility, was arrested in Louisiana last year in the alleged rape of a 78-year-old resident, a director at the facility, Julie Henry, was quick to issue an emotional statement to local media — claiming the company was “shocked and disheartened.” But not long after, Henry was arrested, accused of orchestrating an elaborate cover-up of the abuse. According to police, she had tried to prevent an investigation by instructing staff not to report the incident. She asked employees at the assisted living facility, Beau Provence Memory Care, to hand over all evidence to her, which she then allegedly destroyed. The chef, Jerry Kan, was indicted on a first first-degree rape charge and has pleaded not guilty. The case is ongoing and his attorney declined to comment.

Henry has not been indicted, and her case is under review. Henry’s attorney said he is confident the continued investigation will result in her exoneration. “The resident and the cook, Mr. Kan, initially denied anything had occurred, creating confusion as to whether this was a reportable incident. When it was learned that an incident had occurred, Ms. Henry cooperated fully with the police and continues to do so,” he said in an email. Beau Provence said it was working with police and the state health department to “verify the facts behind these allegations,” but said it could not comment further on an ongoing investigation.

Even in facilities where there were no allegations of an orchestrated cover-up, documents examined by CNN showed a failure to preserve evidence. A resident who alleged abuse would be given a shower, for instance, or the crime scene might be disturbed by the washing of bedsheets. As a result, possible DNA evidence was lost.

In Minnesota, officials transferred an 89-year-old resident at the Edgewood Vista assisted living facility to the psychiatric ward of a local hospital after she reported being raped. A certified nursing assistant, Andrew Merzwski, 28, admitted to having sex with the resident but claimed it was consensual. A director at the facility believed him and blamed the victim — who suffered from dementia — telling the sexual assault nurse who examined the victim that the resident was a “flirt.”

“She (had) come forward and spoken out against her facility and she was locked in a room,” the nurse examiner, Theresa Flesvig, told CNN. “She felt like she was in prison. She felt like she was being punished.” Her rape examination didn’t occur until almost a week after the alleged assault. Flesvig said she discovered clear physical evidence of assault, one of the largest vaginal tears she had ever seen. Merzwski pleaded guilty to criminal sexual conduct and was sentenced in 2014 to 53 months in prison, while the state disciplined the official who had sided with him. Merzwski’s attorney declined to comment.

The facility said it couldn’t comment on details of the specific case, citing privacy reasons, but did acknowledge that officials had learned from the incident. “What we learned was we weren’t prepared for anything of this nature,” said Michael Johnson, chief nursing officer for Edgewood Management Group. “We had to do better.”

Sometimes police and state investigators also fail to take complaints seriously. In one instance, a police report reviewed by CNN cited an administrator’s statement that the victim was an “avid viewer of the television show ‘Law and Order'” as a reason to dismiss her allegation. “Hallucinations seem to revolve around episodes of the series,” the officer wrote. As a result, there were no arrests, the rape kit was not tested and the case was closed.

Inside the mind of a nursing home rapist

“The ‘victim’ of this investigation has made similar allegations regarding suspects that do not exist, are physically unable to have committed the act she accuses, etc.,” the police department told CNN in a written statement. “The ‘victim’ suffers from mental illness and hallucinations, her statements are inconsistent and unfounded.”

In the Minnesota case involving nursing aide Kpingbah, the state investigator wrote that the first alleged victim had a “lengthy history of falsely accusing male caregivers of sexual inappropriateness” and “sexual promiscuity and inappropriate boundaries.” When CNN showed this victim’s son the state’s report, he said the characterizations were false.

Asked about this by CNN, the Minnesota Department of Health said the claims had been taken seriously and investigated. “In hindsight and according to current report writing practices, MDH regrets the wording of this statement and apologizes to the family for this insensitive statement,” the agency said.

While assailants such as Kpingbah have ended up behind bars as a result of their crimes, many never face charges.

The older the victim, the less likely an offender will be convicted of sexual abuse, according to a study of the elderly sponsored by the National Institute of Justice. And victims who lived in facilities were even less likely to see their assailants face charges and guilty verdicts.

In fact, victims with dementia and other diseases are often considered such unreliable witnesses that even cases in which an assailant confesses to the crime can end up being thrown out or result in little punishment for the defendant. That was true in the case of Walter Martinez, a St. Louis nursing aide who faced felony rape charges and years in prison after confessing in a resignation letter to abusing two elderly residents sexually. Martinez ended up receiving two years of probation after the alleged victims died or suffered from such severe dementia that they weren’t able to testify.

His attorney told CNN that despite the resignation letter, Martinez had never pleaded guilty to the conduct he was charged with and was prepared to defend himself in court. “Mr. Martinez had gone to counseling and admitted that he had sexual thoughts while performing his regular job duties. He felt tremendous guilt for having these thoughts and that is when he used the term ‘sexual abuse’ in his resignation letter,” he said in an email.

In the case of the Texas woman who saved her bra for weeks as evidence, a suspect was arrested and indicted in the alleged rape. But court records show that prosecutors couldn’t secure the alleged victim’s testimony. The case was dismissed last year despite the fact the DNA from the bra matched a sample taken from the accused. The lab said the chances of the DNA being from anyone else was less than 1 in 983 trillion.

Even those facilities that actively impede investigations or cover up abuse often get little more than a slap on the wrist. The vast majority of nursing homes with horror stories chronicled in the inspection reports are still in business, accepting new residents today.

“How hard is it to shut one down? It is almost impossible,” said Tony Chicotel, a staff attorney at the nonprofit group California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform. “The worst nightmare for the state regulators is a facility closing — because the residents oftentimes have no place to go.”

So instead, government regulators levy fines and withhold Medicare and Medicaid payments in the hope of getting facilities in line. But even when penalties are imposed, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services says are meant to push a facility to correct a given issue as soon as possible, the fines are often shockingly small.

When a facility in Texas failed to take proper action after an elderly man said he was raped and drugged, authorities punished the home with a $116,500 fine and by temporarily banning it from receiving government reimbursements for new patients. But the fine was ultimately cut almost in half, based on the facility’s “financial hardship.” And the ban lasted only 11 days.

A facility in California — which allowed a licensed nurse to work for weeks despite reports he had sexually assaulted a female resident multiple times, kissing her and fondling her breasts — was fined $22,000 by the state.

And then there is Walker Methodist in Minnesota, where 83-year-old Sonja Fischer became the victim of the same kind of violent assault she had fled so many years ago. There she was raped by an employee the facility knew had been the subject of abuse allegations for years.

“She was unable to speak, unable to move,” her daughter Maya recounted just a few weeks after her mother passed away last year. “She couldn’t even cry out when this was happening to her.”

The facility where she was victimized received no penalty at all.

CNN’s Ana Cabrera, Sara Weisfeldt, David Heath, Sergio Hernandez and Andrew Bloomenthal contributed to this report.

NURSING HOME SEX ABUSE: 5 THINGS THAT NEED TO CHANGE

Legal advocates, government regulators, criminal investigators and medical experts agree that sexual abuse in nursing homes can be extremely challenging to prevent and detect. But they say many facilities should be doing much more to protect vulnerable residents.

  1. “When you have a sexual assault claim, you shouldn’t go to a conclusion she’s a problem patient. You should investigate as a sexual assault until proven otherwise.” — Dave Young, district attorney for Colorado’s 17th Judicial District
  2. “Preserve evidence! Don’t bathe or change clothing, sheets, etc., when an assault is suspected.” — Sherry Culp, Kentucky long-term care ombudsman
  3. “Most abuse is undetected and never reported mainly because observable signs are missed or misinterpreted. A little training could go a long way.” — Tony Chicotel, staff attorney at California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform
  4. “As with nearly every type of abuse and neglect seen in nursing homes, the better staffed the facility the less likely sexual abuse will occur. This is a crime of opportunity, so the more supervision the better.” — Kirsten Fish, elder abuse attorney
  5. “There needs to be a reporting system. …The system doesn’t keep track of cases that haven’t been substantiated, [and] their rules for substantiating a complaint are just astronomical. It’s virtually impossible to substantiate a complaint.” — Lt. Chris Chandler, Waynesville, North Carolina, Police Department

From Law 360–More indicted in $45 million Medicare/Medicaid Scheme

https://www.law360.com/articles/873613/more-nurses-plead-guilty-in-45m-medicare-fraud-scheme

Law360, Springfield (December 16, 2016, 4:21 PM EST) — Two more nurses and an office manager pled guilty in Illinois federal court on Thursday to one count to commit health care fraud in litigation involving several Chicago-area home health care companies in a $45 million Medicare scheme.
Registered nurses Mary Mendoza and Ronald Malalis, along with office manager Janet Guerrero entered plea bargains in the alleged scheme run by the owners of Lincolnwood-based Pathways Home Health Services LLC, Donnarich Home Health Care Inc. and Josdan Home Health Care Inc. The owners of the three home health companies, Josephine, Richard and Maribel Tinimbang, are the alleged ringleaders, with help from staff.

In their time participating in the Tinimbangs’ scheme, Mendoza and Malalis allegedly made patients out to be sicker than they were, in order to gain a higher payout from the Medicare program. The nurses allegedly falsified patient care paperwork known as the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, or OASIS form.

“Defendant understood that the sicker the patient appeared to be on the OASIS form, the more the company was paid by Medicare,” Malalis’ plea bargain said. “Defendant also understood the patients he assessed were insured by Medicare, and that such patients were only eligible for home health care if they were homebound. Yet most of the beneficiaries defendant and others enrolled in home health care at Josdan and Pathways were not homebound.”

Mendoza’s plea bargain is similar, admitting she learned how to fraudulently fill out OASIS forms from a supervisor named Monette Mojares and an unnamed person referred to as “Supervisor B.”

“Defendant acknowledges that over the course of approximately two and a half years as a start-of-care nurse, defendant certified non-homebound beneficiaries for home health care more than 150 times, causing Medicare to pay Pathways more than $400,000 but not more than $500,000,” according to the Mendoza’s plea. Malalis’ plea included a similar statistic.

Both Mendoza and Malalis allegedly were pressured to fill out OASIS forms incorrectly in sweeping fashions, prescribing one ailment to many patients.

“Defendant’s supervisors told him to mark all women as incontinent because women have babies,” Malalis’ plea deal said. “Defendant’s supervisors also told him that he should not state on OASIS forms that a beneficiary had scores of ‘zero,’ indicating an ability to independently complete daily activities like walking.”

Both Malalis’ and Mendoza’s plea deals carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a top fine of $250,000.

In the case of Janet Guerrero, Thursday’s plea said Guerrero acknowledged that during her time as office manager of Josdan, she enrolled patients in home care services they did not need at the instruction of Josephine Tinimbang. Guerrero would aggressively contact Medicare beneficiaries who were referred to Donnarich and Josdan, according to her plea.

“The beneficiaries Guerrero spoke with often refused services or told her that they were driving, working, or otherwise able to leave the home regularly and without difficulty,” Guerrero’s plea said. “However, Guerrero was supervised by Josephine Tinimbang, and Tinimbang did not accept that beneficiaries who did not want, need, or qualify for services should not be enrolled. Tinimbang insisted that Guerrero and others make repeated attempts to persuade unqualified beneficiaries to accept the companies’ services, and Guerrero in fact did so.”

In total, 15 people who worked at or with the three companies were indicted as part of a wider crackdown by the Medicare Fraud Strike Force that the government announced in 2015 had swept up 243 individuals in 17 federal districts for Medicare fraud totaling $712 million.

The three Tinimbangs are scheduled to be tried in February, while some of the other Tinimbang health care agencies’ defendants have been given a September trial date. To date, four registered nurses and a president of one of the recruitment companies that sent patients to the agencies have also pled guilty.

Representatives from no parties could be reached for comment on Friday.

Mendoza is represented by Michael Falconer, attorney at law.

Malalis is represented by Gal Pissetzky of Pissetzky & Berliner and Michael Schmiege of the Law Offices of Michael P. Schmiege PC.

Guerrero is represented by MiAngel C. Cody of the Federal Defender Program.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brooke Harper.

The case is USA v. Tinimbang, et al., case number 1:14-cr-00732, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

— Additional reporting by Diana Novak Jones and John Kennedy. Editing by Ben Guilfoy.

More Fraud Charges Added Over $45M Home Health Scheme

Four more counts of health care fraud have been added to the charges faced by a Chicago couple and others who allegedly paid doctors kickbacks in a $45 million scheme to falsely certify that Medicare beneficiaries needed in-home physical therapy, according to a fourth superseding indictment filed Thursday in Illinois federal court.

Read Full Article

Alleged Leader Of $45M Medicare Fraud Blames ‘Dictator’ Mom

One of the alleged ringleaders of a $45 million scheme to defraud Medicare is pinning the blame for the operation on his fugitive mother, who was accused at the opening of an Illinois federal trial Monday of being a “dictator” who left her son at the mercy of federal prosecutors.

Read Full Article

Home Health Care Exec Cops To Role In $45M Fraud

The former director of nursing of a home health company caught up in a massive $45 million fraud scheme pled guilty Monday to falsifying medical records to make it appear as if Medicare patients were homebound when they were not.

Read Full Article

Chicago Couple Charged In $45M Medicare, H-1B Visa Frauds

A Chicago couple has been charged with paying doctors kickbacks in a $45 million scheme to falsely certify Medicare beneficiaries needing in-home physical therapy and lying to get an H-1B visa for a Filipino woman they forced to work as their maid, federal prosecutors said Monday.

Read Full Article

Latest News

HHS Asks Justices Not To Review Medicare Billing Suit

The government has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a bid for review of a determination that a Florida ophthalmology clinic connected to criminal charges against U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., overbilled Medicare by nearly $9 million by extracting multiple doses of a macular degeneration drug from a single-dose vial.

Read Full Article

16 Texans Charged In $60M Medicare Fraud Scheme

Sixteen Texas residents were charged with participating in a $60 million Medicare fraud scheme that involved improperly putting patients into hospice care and giving some of them unnecessary doses of morphine and other drugs, the U.S. Department of Justice announced Tuesday.

Read Full Article

Alleged Leader Of $45M Medicare Fraud Blames ‘Dictator’ Mom

One of the alleged ringleaders of a $45 million scheme to defraud Medicare is pinning the blame for the operation on his fugitive mother, who was accused at the opening of an Illinois federal trial Monday of being a “dictator” who left her son at the mercy of federal prosecutors.

Read Full Article

Feds Blast Drug Return Co.’s ‘Puffery’ Defense In $116M Fraud

Statements from Guaranteed Returns’ promotional materials used while the company allegedly stole $116 million in refunds from pharmaceutical manufacturers can show it engaged in fraud and are not simply “puffery,” Pennsylvania federal prosecutors argued Monday.

Read Full Article

1st Circ. Affirms Conviction In $19.9M Mass. Medicare Fraud

The director of clinical services at a Massachusetts home health services agency knew that she was assisting a $19.9 million Medicare fraud by falsifying paperwork to make patients wrongly seem eligible for services, the First Circuit affirmed Friday.

Read Full Article

Ex-Clinic Owner Given 5 Years In $70M Medicare Scheme

The co-owner of three New York health clinics was sentenced in a New York federal court on Friday to five years in prison for running a $70 million Medicare and Medicaid fraud in which he paid indigent people to undergo unnecessary medical tests and then billed the government.

Read Full Article

South Texas Woman Convicted In $2.5M Medicaid Fraud

A federal jury convicted a woman who formerly operated a durable medical equipment company in McAllen, Texas, on all 18 counts of defrauding Medicaid through $2.5 million in fraudulent billing for incontinence supplies, the U.S. Department of Justice announced on Friday.

Read Full Article

Medical Supply Co. Owner Gets 27 Years In $3.5M Fraud

A 55-year-old man who was involved in a $3.5 million scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid by filing false claims for powered wheelchairs and scooters was sentenced Thursday in San Antonio, Texas, to 27 years in prison, the U.S. Department of Justice announced.

Read Full Article

‘Puffery’ Isn’t Fraud, Says Drug Return Co. In $116M Case

Guaranteed Returns on Wednesday urged a Pennsylvania federal court to tell a jury that puffery or sales talk is not fraud, in the midst of a trial alleging that the company — which helps the government and providers return expired drugs — stole $116 million worth of refunds from pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Read Full Article

Gov’t Fights Health Care Cos.’ Evidence In $45M Fraud Case

Fraud in Chicago’s home health industry is so widespread that executives accused of a $45 million Medicare fraud shouldn’t be able to present a jury with examples of other companies’ billing practices, the federal government said Wednesday.

Read Full Article

Clinic Manager Cops To Role In $70M Medicare Fraud Scheme

The manager of two New York health care clinics pled guilty Monday to taking part in a $70 million scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid by paying beneficiaries to undergo medically unnecessary tests for which the clinics could then bill the government.

Read Full Article

The Missing Key To 3rd-Party Litigation Funding

Unlike other forms of commerce and unlike in other nations, litigation investment and funding in the U.S. is largely unregulated with few disclosure requirements. Where darkness exists, ignorance and mistrust breed. Disclosure and transparency in litigation investment and funding is the first and proper step to better understand this opaque dynamic in the U.S. civil justice system, says Tripp Haston of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.

Read Full Article

Ex-Chicago Contractor Pays $20M To End Bribery Suit

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Monday that a former city contractor will pay $20 million to end claims it paid bribes to secure $126 million in contracts to install red-light cameras at city intersections, allegations that sent a former official and the company’s onetime CEO to jail.

Read Full Article

RAFFLE TICKETS now on sale to benefit Justice 4 Every1, NFP

Raffle tickets are $20 and will benefit the victims of crime in the courts and provide innocence project assistance to those of your who have experienced corruption in the courts (no jurisdiction, changed transcripts, judges obviously not following the law, summary orders to terminate POAs, Health Surrogate terminations, wrongful arrests, wrongful convictions and so many other unconstitutional and Fraud on the Court Proceedings.)  We can find plenty of attorneys and others to help you in pro se pleadings and I will help you report these crimes to the authorities, but we need money to pay rent, Comcast, transcript fees, court fees (for judges that wrongfully deny pauper’s petitions as a way to keep people from appealing unconstitutional decisions).  Our attorneys work many long hours for free for you. All we need to pay is overhead so we have a private place to meet and get you the assistance you need to fight corruption in Crook County, Illinois.

We specialize in upholding your constitutional rights.

We fight granny kidnapping, grandpa kidnapping, medical kidnap, custody given to abusers and psychopaths.  Many of you are familiar with our work.

Our current raffle ends April 1, 2017 at which time $20 raffle tickets will pull a winner for $4,000 for a $20 ticket. The ticket sales end at $20,000 you you will have a 1 in 1000 chance to win $20,000 or a minimum of 20% of ticket sales at the time the raffle ends.

An independent accounting firm will handle the ticket stubs and pull the winner.

Email me for a chance to win today.  A $20 ticket will give you a 1 in 1000 chance to win $20,000 if we sell all the tickets by April 1, 2017.

If you would like to sell tickets for us, or get people to sign petitions to reinstate myself, Ken Ditkowsky and Lanre Amu for speaking out against corruption in the courts, also email me.

joanne@justice4every1.com

thanks for your support

From FB-90 year old woman foreclosed upon and evicted from home of 60+ yrs in reverse mortgage scam

For those of you even considering a Reverse Mortgage or wondering why they are such a scam, read on:

http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2017/02/90-year-old_woman_prepares_for_eviction_from_home.html

The highlights of the article are:  woman takes out $180,000 loan after paying off equity credit line.  Home is worth $300,000.  Woman falls behind in tax payments which trigger automatic foreclosure clause for failure to pay taxes.

Next thing you know she is in foreclosure court.  But wait, there’s more. The loan has now, in 10 years, blossomed to a $300,000 balance. How did that happen?

I believe that once the foreclosure process has been started, even making the taxes current won’t stop the lender from foreclosing and taking the home. These scam type loans are a boon to scammers in suits with college and even law degrees. But they are no better than the drug dealer down the street, in need of quick cash, breaking into your home with a gun and taking all the silver, artwork, cash and other valuables. Some psychopaths steal with a gun, others with a pen.

What a lucrative way to do business!

The courts don’t seem to care and there are few regulations in place to allow elders and their families to get those tax payments current.

What a shame for this woman.

The real kicker?  The company doing the scam Reverse Mortgages foreclosed on 40% of homes in the program eventually–and the person doing these foreclosures is now DT’s Secretary of the Treasury.  But I’m sure no one is surprised.  From the scamming private sector preying on the poor and elderly, there is now an open door into government, via the New World Order and the New Administration.  We are now in full Republican mode.

Joanne

From NLRG – great resource on Statute of Limitations in Civil Actions in Illinois

Click to access il_statutes_of_limitations.pdf

 

LEGAL RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, AND ADVOCACY FOR ATTORNEYS Founded in 1969, NLRG is the nation’s oldest and largest provider of legal research services to attorneys. We have served more than 50,000 attorneys in private practice, corporate legal departments, and state and local government offices at the rate of 3,500 cases per year. Our attorney staff, chosen for their outstanding academic credentials and writing ability, most of whom engaged in private practice before joining us, have on average 18 years of experience, and specialize according to area of law. Preliminary consultations and cost estimates are provided without obligation. How to contact us: E-mail research@nlrg.com Phone 800-727-6574 Fax 434-817-6570 Web http://www.nlrg.com Address PO Box 7187, Charlottesville, VA 22906 Illinois Statutes of Limitations How to use our services: • Call 1-800-727-6574. • Tell our telephone receptionist that you need to speak with the Senior Attorney who specializes in the area of law involved in your case. If you already know the attorney with whom you would like to speak, just ask for that attorney. • Tell our Senior Attorney what you need and when you need it. Our Senior Attorney will work with you to define exactly what issues should be researched and the most appropriate work product. He or she will give you a cost estimate for doing the research you have requested. There is no charge for the initial consultation and cost estimate, and you are under no obligation to proceed. We never exceed the agreed-upon cost estimate without your approval. If you prefer, you may e-mail or fax us your tentative request and the documentation you would like us to review. We will review those materials free of charge and call to discuss the matter and give you a cost estimate at your convenience. Again, there is no obligation to proceed. © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 1 Illinois Statutes of limitations The following is an alphabetical listing of Illinois statutes of limitations arranged by area of law. Only those statutes that establish a time period are included. Statutes that establish general rules for the application and interpretation of statutes of limitations have been omitted. No attempt has been made to systematically include tolling periods or rules, administrative or regulatory time limits, or appeals periods. The information presented here is intended for use as a quick reference. The applicability of each limitations period will need to be determined on a case-by-case basis through examination of the entire statute and relevant case law. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is offered with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal services. If legal advice is required, the services of a competent attorney should be sought. (From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations.) Area of Law Limitations Period Statute ABUSE OF PROCESS 2 years 735 ILCS 5/13-202 ACCOUNTING Action based on violation of the Illinois Public Accounting Act 2 years from date of violation or date plaintiff knew or should have known of violation, but no more than 5 years from date of injury 735 ILCS 5/13- 214.2 ACCOUNTS [See also U.C.C.] Actions on open accounts for services 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13-205 Actions on open accounts for sales 4 years 810 ILCS 5/2-725 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW [See also UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION] Rule challenge 2 years from the effective date the rule 5 ILCS 100/5-35 Action to review final administrative decision Appeal filed within 35 days 735 ILCS 5/3-103 ADOPTION Action to set aside waiver 12 months from date of waiver 750 ILCS 50/11 Action to set aside consent 12 months from date of consent 750 ILCS 50/11 ADVERSE POSSESSION [See also REAL PROPERTY] For vacant land on which taxes are being paid 7 years after paying taxes continually on the land 735 ILCS 5/13-110 Without color of title 20 years 735 ILCS 5/13-101 With record title 7 years 735 ILCS 5/13-107 With color of title and payment of all taxes on the property 7 years 735 ILCS 5/13-109 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 2 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute AGRICULTURE Illegal purchase of wild plants 6 months 720 ILCS 400/2 Claim alleging contract in violation of the agricultural Production Contract Code 4 years after the party claiming the violation knew or should have known of the violation 505 ILCS 17/55 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES Civil action for service of alcohol to minors 2 years 740 ILCS 58/5 ANIMAL CRUELTY Civil action for animal cruelty 2 years 510 ILCS 70/16.3 Criminal action for animal cruelty [See CRIMES] ANTITRUST Civil action for antitrust violation 4 years 740 ILCS 10/7 Criminal action for antitrust violation [See CRIMES] ARBITRATION AWARDS 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 205 BANKING Action to enforce an obligation, duty or right arising under Article 4, entitled “Bank Deposits and Collections” 3 years after the cause of action accrues 810 ILCS 5/4-111 Negotiable instruments –action to enforce the obligation of a party to a certificate of deposit to pay the instrument must be commenced within 6 years after demand for payment is made to the maker, but if the instrument states a due date and the maker is not required to pay before that date, the 6-year period begins when a demand for payment is in effect and the due date has passed 810 ILCS 5/3- 118(e) —action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft must be commenced within 3 years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first 810 ILCS 5/3- 118(c) —action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an accepted draft, other than a certified check (i) within 6 years after the due date or dates stated in the draft or acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable at a definite time, or (ii) within 6 years after the date of the acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable on demand. 810 ILCS 5/3- 118(f) —action to enforce the obligation of the acceptor of a certified check or the issuer of a teller’s check, cashier’s check, or traveler’s check commenced within 3 years after demand for payment is made to the acceptor or issuer, as the case may be. 810 ILCS 5/3- 118(d) © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 3 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute BONDS Generally 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 206 Sheriff’s bonds 3 years 735 ILCS 5/19-115 CIVIL ACTIONS 5 years for all civil actions not otherwise provided for 735 ILCS 5/13- 205 CONSTRUCTION Construction actions arising out of design, planning, supervision, observation, or management 4 years from the date person knew or should have known of defect 735 ILCS 5/13-214 CONSORTIUM The same limitations as the personal injury action filed in conjunction with the claim 735 ILCS 5/13- 203 CONSUMER PROTECTION Claim arising out of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act 3 years after the cause of action accrued; provided that, whenever any action is brought by the Attorney General or a State’s Attorney for a violation of this Act, the running of the foregoing statute of limitations, with respect to every private right of action for damages which is based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in said action by the Attorney General or State’s Attorney, shall be suspended during the pendency thereof, and for one year thereafter 815 ILCS 505/10a Recovery of payday loans action may not be filed until 28 days after default date of loan, and if repayment plan is negotiated, no default will be found 815 ILCS 122/2-45 CONTRACTS Written contracts 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13-206 Unwritten contracts 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13-205 CONVERSION Common-law conversion action 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13-205 Conversion of negotiable instruments [See also BANKING] 3 years 810 ILCS 5/3-118 CORPORATIONS Claims against a dissolved corporation 5 years 805 ILCS 5/12.80 Known claims against dissolved limited liability company 90 days from notice of dissolution 805 ILCS 180/25- 45 Unknown claims against a dissolved LLC 5 years from publication of notice of dissolution 805 ILCS 180/25- 50 Tax recovery action against corporation 7 years from filing of annual tax report 805 ILCS 5/15.90 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 4 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute CREDITORS Claims alleging a violation of the Collection Agency Act 5 years after the occurrence of the alleged violation 225 ILCS 425/9.5 Creditors claims against an estate, dissolved corporation, limited liability company, or partnership [See CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, WILLS AND ESTATES] CRIMES All offenses with limitation unless otherwise provided for 3 years 720 ILCS 5/3-5 All offenses without limitation –Child pornography under (1) 11-20.1B(a), or (2) any offense involving sexual conduct or sexual penetration, as defined by Criminal Code 11-0. 1 in which DNA profile of offender is obtained and entered into a DNA database within 10 years after the commission of the offense no limitation 720 ILCS 5/3-5 —Concealment of homicidal death, treason, arson, aggravated arson, forgery, child pornography under of Section 11-20.1(a) no limitation 720 ILCS 5/3-5 —Failure to give information and render aid under Illinois Vehicle Code 11-403 no limitation 720 ILCS 5/3-5 —Leaving the scene of an accident involving death no limitation 720 ILCS 5/3-5 —Murder, manslaughter, reckless homicide no limitation 720 ILCS 5/3-5 DEFAMATION 1 year 735 ILCS 5/13-201 DISCRIMINATION 2 years 735 ILCS 5/13-202 EXCEPTIONS TO LIMITATIONS Death of party entitled to commence an action action may be commenced by his or her representative before the expiration of the time limited or within one year from his or her death, whichever date is the later 735 ILCS 5/13-209 Death of party against whom an action may be brought action may be commenced against his or her personal representative after the expiration of the time limited and within 6 months after the person’s death 735 ILCS 5/13-209 Minors or persons under legal disability if person entitled to bring an action specified in sections 13-201 through 13-210 of the Civil Procedures Act at the time the cause of action accrued, is under the age 18 years, or under a legal disability, then action may be brought within 2 years after the person attains the age of 18 years or the disability is removed 735 ILCS 5/13-211 Out of state tolls the limitation for the period the individual is out of the State and not subject to the jurisdiction of the court 735 ILCS 5/13-208 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 5 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute FALSE IMPRISONMENT [See PERSONAL INJURY] FORFEITURE Civil action contesting forfeiture pursuant to Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act 5 years after the last conduct giving rise to forfeiture became known or should have become known or 5 years after the forfeitable property is discovered, whichever is later 725 ILCS 150/9 FINE ART Violation of the Fine Prints Disclosure Act 1 year from date of discovery or date the violation should have been discovered but no more than 3 years from date print purchased 815 ILCS 345/8 EMPLOYMENT Actions brought under Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 206 FORECLOSURE 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13-115 FRAUD Fraudulent concealment 5 years from date of fraud 735 ILCS 5/13-215 INDEMNITY Action seeking indemnity for contribution that did not arise out of litigation 2 years from the date the party seeking contribution or indemnity made payment 735 ILCS 5/13- 204 Action seeking indemnity for contribution that arose out of litigation 2 years after the party seeking contribution or indemnity has been served with process in the underlying action or more than 2 years from the time the party, or his or her privy, knew or should reasonably have known of an act or omission giving rise to the action for contribution or indemnity, whichever period expires later 735 ILCS 5/13- 204 INSURANCE Action against an insurance provider concerning the sale, placement, procurement, renewal, cancellation of, or failure to procure any policy of insurance 2 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 214.4 JUDGMENTS Generally 7 years, but renewable 735 ILCS 5/12-108 Child support judgments no limitation 735 ILCS 5/12-108 LIBEL [See DEFAMATION] MALICIOUS PROSECUTION [See ABUSE OF PROCESS] © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 6 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute MALPRACTICE Accounting 2 years from date of violation or date plaintiff knew or should have known of violation, but no more than 5 years from date of injury 735 ILCS 5/13- 214.2 Attorney 2 years from date of malpractice or date plaintiff knew or should have known of malpractice, but not more than 6 years from date of malpractice 735 ILCS 5/13- 214.3 Dentistry 3 years from date of complaint 225 ILCS 25/23 Medical 2 years from date the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury, but no more than 4 years from date of injury; however, if plaintiff is under the age of 18 at time of injury, the limitation period is 8 years from date the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury, but no cause of action may be brought after the child’s 22nd birthday 735 ILCS 5/13-212 MENTAL HEALTH [See PERSONAL INJURY] Action alleging a violation of the Sexual Exploitation in Psychotherapy, Professional Health Services, and Professional Mental Health Services Act 2 years 740 ILCS 140/6 PARTNERSHIPS Dissolved partnerships -Known claims against a dissolved partnership 120 days after receipt of notice 805 ILCS 215/806 -Unknown claims against a dissolved partnership 5 years after published notification 805 ILCS 215/806 PERSONAL INJURY [See also PRODUCTS LIABILITY] 2 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 202 Medical malpractice 2 years from date the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury but no more than 4 years from date of injury; however, if plaintiff is under the age of 18 at time of injury, the limitation period is 8 years from date the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury, but no cause of action may be brought after the child’s 22nd birthday 735 ILCS 5/13-212 Civil actions arising out of criminal acts —Action based on commission of a Class X or first-degree murder 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 214.1 —Action arising out of the Predator Accountability Act 10 years from sex trade act 735 ILCS 5/13-225 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 7 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute PERSONAL INJURY [Continued] —Action for damages based on personal injury not involving criminal first-degree murder or Class X felony 2 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 202 —Statutory penalty or personal injury action alleging childhood sexual abuse 20 years from date of abuse or date abuse was, or should have been, reasonably discovered 735 ILCS 5/13- 202.2 —Statutory penalty or personal injury action based on first degree murder no limitation 735 ILCS 5/13- 202.1 PRODUCTS LIABILITY 12 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession by a seller or 10 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession to its initial user, consumer, or other nonseller, whichever period expires earlier, of any product unit that is claimed to have injured or damaged the plaintiff, unless the defendant expressly has warranted or promised the product for a longer period and the action is brought within that period 735 ILCS 5/13-213 PUBLIC UTILITIES Claim for overpayment of fees 2 years from date service provided 220 ILCS 5/9-252 Violation of the Illinois Underground Utility Facilities Damage Prevention Act 2 years from date of violation 220 ILCS 50/12 Claim for compensation of a loss caused by the release, in Illinois, of radioactivity from the regional disposal facility 5 years from the date of the discovery of the damage or loss 420 ILCS 20/15 REAL PROPERTY Action brought alleging breach of condition subsequent in contract for real property 7 years 735 ILCS 5/13-102 Adverse possession [See ADVERSE POSSESSION] Construction actions arising out of design, planning, supervision, observation or management [See CONSTRUCTION] Exceptions to Statute of Limitations If, at the time when such right of entry or of action upon or for lands first accrues, the person entitled to such entry or action is a minor, or person under legal disability, imprisoned or absent from the United States in the service of the United States or of this State, such person or any one claiming from, by or under him or her, may make the entry or bring the action at any time within 2 years after such disability is removed, notwithstanding the time before limited in that behalf has expired. 735 ILCS 5/13-112 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 8 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute Real Property (Continued) Enforcement of liens against the property 30 years, but renewable for an additional 10 years if conditions are met 735 ILCS 5/13-116 Foreclosure [See FORECLOSURE] Home Inspector actions 5 years 225 ILCS 441/15- 30 Injury done to property 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 205 Leases —Written 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 206 —Unwritten 5 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 205 Violations of Illinois Real Estate Timeshare Act of 1999 5 years 735 ILCS 101- 15/85 PROMISSORY NOTES 10 years 735 ILCS 5/13- 206 RAILROAD ACTIONS 3 years 735 ILCS 5/13-219 REAL ESTATE BROKERS/APPRAISERS Action for damages arising out of the Real Estate License Act of 2000 2 years from date of violation or date plaintiff knew or should have known of the violation but no more than 5 years from date of violation 225 ILCS 454/15- 70 Disciplinary action for real estate appraiser must be commenced within 5 years after the occurrence of the alleged violation or within 2 years after final disposition of any judicial proceeding, including any appeals, in which the appraiser provided testimony related to the assignment, whichever period expires last. 225 ILCS 458/15- 30 ROADWAYS Personal injury action against county engineer or superintendent of highways 1 year 745 ILCS 15/2 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 9 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute SECURITIES [See also CRIMES] Civil claim for a violation of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 3 years from the date of sale provided that if the party bringing the action neither knew nor in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known of any alleged violation of subsections E, F, G, H, I, or J of Section 12 of this Act which is the basis for the action, the 3-year period provided herein shall begin to run upon the earlier of (1) the date upon which the party bringing the action has actual knowledge of the alleged violation of this Act; or (2) the date upon which the party bringing the action has notice of facts which in the exercise of reasonable diligence would lead to actual knowledge of the alleged violation of this Act; but in no event shall the period of limitation so extended be more than 2 years beyond the expiration of the 3 year period otherwise applicable 815 ILCS 5/13 Criminal prosecution for a violation of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 3 years after the violation upon which such prosecution is based provided, however, that if the accused has intentionally concealed evidence of a violation of subsections E, F, G, H, I, J, or K of Section 12 of this Act, the period of limitation prescribed herein shall be extended up to an additional 2 years after the proper prosecuting officer becomes aware of the offense but in no such event shall the period of limitation so extended be more than 2 years beyond the expiration of the period otherwise applicable 815 ILCS 5/14 SECURITY Claim alleging violation of the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004 5 years 225 ILCS 447/40- 50 SERVICE LIENS 1 year from date of service if lien is properly filed 770 ILCS 45/1; 770 ILCS 45/2 SLANDER [See DEFAMATION] © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 10 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute STATE GOVERNMENT Actions against public officers and employees —Action against public officers and employees based in tort or contract 2 years from date of injury or date plaintiff knew or should have known of injury, but no more than 6 years from date of injury 745 ILCS 10/8-101 —All other actions against public officers and employees 1 year 745 ILCS 10/8-101 All claims against the State not expressly accounted for in statute 2 years 705 ILCS 505/22 Action alleging public contractor misconduct 6 years after the date of the contract or the date upon which the State discovered the misconduct, whichever is later 720 ILCS 5/33-7 Claims against State arising out of contract 5 years 745 ILCS 505/22 Claims against State by vendors of goods or services under Illinois Public Aid Code 1 year 705 ILCS 505/22 SURVEYOR ACTIONS 4 years after person knew or should have known of negligence 735 ILCS 5/13-222 TAXES Violation of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act 6 years 35 ILCS 120/5 Claim for refund of the service occupation tax 3 years from January 1 or July 1 claim was due 35 ILCS 115/19 Claim for refund of inheritance or transfer tax within 1 year after the last date allowable by the I.R.S. for filing a claim for refund 35 ILCS 405/14 Collection of delinquent real estate taxes 20 years from date of delinquency 35 ILCS 200/20- 190 Collection of delinquent special assessment 30 years from date of delinquency 35 ILCS 200/20- 190 Collection of unpaid income tax owed 4 years from the end of the calendar year at during which tax return was filed 50 ILCS 45/30 Taxpayer’s claim for refund must be filed within 5 years from date the right to a refund arose 35 ILCS 200/20- 175 TRADE SECRETS 5 years from date misappropriation was or should have been discovered 765 ILCS 1065/7 U.C.C. Breach of contract for sale 4 years, but contract may limit time period to not less than 1 year 810 ILCS 5/2-725 © 2012 National Legal Research Group, Inc. 11 Area of Law Limitations Period Statute UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION Action for review of administrative decision must be filed within 35 days of when decision was served 735 ILCS 5/3-103 Recovery of unpaid unemployment insurance from an employer 4 years from date of contributions 820 ILCS 405/2207 WHISTLEBLOWER ACTION 3 years from date of violation or date violation should have been known of, but not more than 10 years from date of violation 740 ILCS 175/5 WILLS AND ESTATES Action to enforce a will 2 years after the death of the deceased person unless letters of office are applied for on his or her estate within 2 years after his or her death and the representative has complied with the provisions of Section 18-3 of the Probate Act of 1975 as amended, in regard to the giving of notice to creditors, in which case the action shall be commenced within and not after the time for presenting a claim against the estate of a deceased person as provided in the Probate Act of 1975, as amended 735 ILCS 5/13-221 Claim against the estate by an unknown creditor 6 months after publication of notice 755 ILCS 5/18-3 Claim against the estate by an known creditor 3 months after receipt of notice from the personal representative 755 ILCS 5/18-3 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Action alleging entitlement to compensation not based on an injury caused by exposure to radiological materials or equipment or asbestos 3 years from date of accident if no compensation has been paid or, if compensation has been paid, within 2 years from the date compensation was paid 820 ILCS 305/6

From FB: Ashton Kucher’s efforts to save children from Sex Trafficking

 

I know that a lot of people have contacted me about their families being affected by the Sex Trafficking industry.

Today on Facebook, I found the following video submitted by several concerned members:

Apparently Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher are cofounders of Thorn which builds software to track down and eliminate sex traffickers.

I found the address of their nonprofit, Thorn, NFP, which is

Thorn nonprofit public benefit corporation CALIFORNIA 544 4th Street Manhattan Beach CALIFORNIA 90266

If you need help with your case, this charity might help and I commend these two fine actors for becoming involved in this field, where there seems to be no help for these victims.

From Candice Schwager–On Judicial Immunity–Sparkman v. Stump is actually an Indian Tribal Case!

On Feb 16, 2017, at 8:10 PM,
Indian Country is defined in Title 15.

The key case for Absolute Judicial Immunity is Spark v Stumpman. But both Spark and Stumpman were Native Americans living on the reservation. The Court Stumpman was a judge for was a tribal court, not an Indiana state court. Most lawyers don’t have a clue that the nations have their own civil and criminal laws. There is some state and federal overlap in the area of criminal law. Those are the major crimes act, the minor crimes act, the assimilative crimes act and Public Law 280. There is no state or federal overlap in tribal civil law jurisdiction. Under 1 Stat 20 section 34 the federal courts are required to use the law of the state for all state law claims. The federal court in Indiana had to use Native American civil law in resolving that case,– not Indiana state law. Native Americans are Article IV subjects and that case has no business being used as authority in Article III jurisprudence.

That would be like using a civil rights case out of China as Article III authority.
As it has been stated on this blog before, judges do NOT have absolute judicial immunity. They have limited immunity for making decisions when briefs and motions are properly put before them.  A judge must make certain that all defendants have been served by the sheriff or a licensed process server or in accordance with law before taking any courtroom action.  Judges are responsible for basic due process:  Notice, Properly filed Motion or Complaint, Discovery, a Jury Trial where permissible and properly requested by a litigant and a fair hearing.
The Ciavarella Case:  ciavarella case

From GSN Groups–End child brides in the US

While the US maligns other 3rd world countries regarding human rights abuses, we still have yet to fix our problems in our own backyard–and that is the serious problem with child brides.

If a girl is pregnant, with parental consent, a shocking 27 states have no law at which marriage is simply too young.

And a girl aged 17 or younger can be forced into a marriage she does not want, does not need and does not understand when she is young and has no real options to escape.

The US has to end child marriage NOW.  Girls can no longer be forced into marrying men, often those much older than themselves.  Many of these men will beat them, keep them at home without transportation, and the girl has no real escape options.  Children often grow up with a violent, distant father figure and are emotionally, if not physically scared for life.

Read the statistics on how these girls rarely graduate from college, bear children while being just a child themselves and incapable of properly raising children.

Girls who want to escape can’t because shelters won’t let children stay without parental consent–the same parents who provided the consent to marry a child off.  Juvenile records are often sealed to NGOs who would help them. Social services won’t intervene because the marriages are considered “lawful.” So a girl placed into an abusive marriage by abusive parents has no hope for escape, even if the man she is married off to is significantly older, does not support her and is emotionally and/or physically abusive toward her.

The state will turn its back on this girl.

Read more at

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/02/10/why-does-the-united-states-still-let-12-year-old-girls-get-married/?utm_term=.97abe7a606ff

and watch the video.

We must save these girls.

JoAnne

From Ken Ditkowsky–Fixing the broken and troubled Cook County Probate System–where is Larkin on this?

Indeed, it is good to hear from you.   It is not good to be reminded that IT IS UNSAFE TO GROW OLD IN AMERICA AND IN PARTICULAR COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.  So far, the Ill. Atty. Registration and Discipline Commission, headed by Jerome Larkin, is giving favored attorneys a pass on perfidy in the court room. Why these attorneys are not investigated is completely unknown at this time, because all probate lawyers and many general practice lawyers know this is a serious problem, yet nothing is done by the authorities and the ARDC is used to cover up the problem.   
Under Illinois law, and in particular 755 ILCS 5/11A – 3b the Illinois Legislature has made it clear that guardianship is not  an invitation to exploit and abuse under corrupt court supervision convenient elderly people. A guardianship is very strictly limited to essentially helping a disabled person (such as a senior) to be able to enjoy the fruits of American citizenship.    It is not a forfeiture of rights (as has been the case in Sykes, Gore, et al) and it is not an invitation for greedy individuals with clout to exploit or abuse elderly citizens.
Yes, I am aware that an elderly person in Illinois is treated as prey by so many of our corrupt judges and the Courts actually encourage exploitation for profit.   Yes, I am aware that certain “care facilities’ openly and notoriously exploit the elderly and disabled openly, regularly and notoriously.    Yes, I am aware that this is an open secret and most of our political and judicial elite deplore this situation in public and practice it in private.   The Philip Esformes case (the theft of a billion dollars in Medicare funds) is an example.  The immunity that is given to his Chicago cohorts is a stark example of the role of clout and corruption the permeates Illinois and the body politic.   And yes, I am aware that here in Illinois Mr. Larkin and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission along with the Illinois Supreme Court Justices are hell bent in preventing any lawyer from exposing judicial corruption.   Rule 8.3 in Illinois is meaningless and 18 USCA 4 protestations to law enforcement are fatal to a legal career.   Thus, obtaining a lawyer is a chore – no lawyer who is not willing to risk his/her career and reputation will come within fifty feet of one of these cases.   Mr. Larkin has demonstrated very clearly that he is willing to commit and suborn perjury and any other incidental crime to in violation of 18 USCA 371 to protect the exploitation, abuse, forfeiture of human rights, and retroactive abortion of senior citizens by dishonest judicial officials. 
The question of what to do is interesting.    The first step is to ascertain all the facts applicable to the case and find out what, if any, disabilitly the designated victim might possess.    If the senior has no disabilities, such as Mary Sykes, the the mere application for guardianship suggests a real fraud is in the works.   Prepare for a ‘wired judge.’    (NB.  Judge Maureen Connors at page 91 of her evidence deposition admitted to being “fixed.”). If this is the issue that has to be dealt with you have to know that no matter what evidence is presented an adverse decision is forthcoming.   You are going to have to haunt law enforcement until you can find someone who believes in America and the Rule of Law.    The petitioner must prove the incompetence and its degree by clear and convincing evidence.    As was noted in the Sykes case all Judge Connors needed with the attornment of her two guardian ad litem.   No notice – no hearing required.
The second step after all the facts have been garnered is to attempt to find a courageous health care professional – such as a doctor – to be prepared to testify as to the health care status of anticipated victim.   Fraud at this point in the process will be in the air.   The Shrink in the Jaycox case, who was being paid by the nursing home operator, had no problem with an outright lie.   (His lie was uncovered when he had Mr. Jayox sign the consents for an operation that were totally inconsistent with his(the shrink) report.   An affidavit detailing the MD’s analysis should be obtained.    As the Fraud is accompanied by intimidation in these cases take whatever you can get and garner all medical records.    As part of the 2nd step a video recorded interview of the elderly victim to be  should be obtained.  There should be questions that make clear:
1) to the extent that the elderly person knows the objects of her bounty,
2) to the extent that the elderly persons knows the extent and nature of her estate.
3) questions the bear on the business accumen of the proposed victim – for instance – can she deposit her social security check in the local bank.  Does she do her own shopping at the grocery store?  Does she pay her own bills?  *****
Photographs work very well to refute the nursing home people, the propoponent of the guardianship and the guardian ad litem.    Expect that strong objection will be made to any photographs, expecially those that illustrate the elder cleansing.   In the Sykes case, the miscreants fought hard to prevent any photographs or videos involving Mary to be viewed.   Truth and decency are also victims in these cases.
The 3rd step is to put all the evidence together, and make certain that it is scanned and submitted to LAW ENFORCEMENT and in particular the Justice Department.   As you can see I’ve forwarded your note to Law Enforcement.   If the government is going to have a successful health care program it is going to have to eliminate most of the fraud that is not obtaining a favored position with the Political Establishment.   It was no accident that Philip Esformes was able to steal a billion dollars from Medicare.   Without the facilitation of criminals imbedded in Government and the judicary he would not have been so successful.   Here in Illinois under the shepardship of Jerome Larkin and his IARDC we would have had another “Operation Greylord” and this time more judges would go to jail rather than be elevated to the Appellate Court of Illinois.     NB.  If an honest attorney can be garnered, I’d advise that the victims family seek his/her aid as soon as possible; however, based upon Amu’s 3 year suspension, Denison’s 3 year suspension and my 4 years suspension all for calling for an HONEST INVESTIGATION do not expect that any attorney with the skills to deal with the problem is going to accept the assignment.   Larkin filed a document with the Supreme Court of Illinois that in words and phrases stated that the blog MARYGSYKES in exposing corruption was akin “to yelling fire in a crowded theater.”   ( As you recall, I got an extra year suspension for not being repentant for writing about this corruption to the Attorney General of the United States!)
The 4th Step is to test the resolve of the effort to obtain a guardianship.   As your friend as a Power of Attorney, this document ought to be brought to the attention of the Court and to the division of the Court that was set up to deal with the Americans With Disabilities Act cases.   Believe it or not, we have all sorts of agencies and government groups that are set up to aid us in defending the ongoing WAR AGAINST THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED.    So far most of these government agencies have demonstrated impotency and disinterest – however, hope springs eternal.   Read 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.   These provisions are not optional – they are jurisdictional!   The fact that presiding judges in the Sykes case (and most other cases of elder cleansing) believe that the RULE OF LAW is optional and does not apply in COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS each one of the requirements is important.   Make a record, and keep bother Law Enforcment until they act to protect the loved one who is being preyed upon.
The rest of the steps at this point are irrelevant.   If you have not obtained law enforcement to do its job at this point in time, the victim is going to be subjected to RETROACTIVE ABORTION and cremated immediately after the last dollar or its equivalent is safely in the hands of the elder cleansers.
The perfidy is S.O.P.    Not only has Illinois government (and the USA) failed to investigate the Mary Sykes case, but even though the State is on the verge of Bankruptcy the approximatley 3 million dollars of taxable booty has not been taxed and not a dime of interest or penalties collected.    As the crimes are committed by conspirators, their liabilty is joint and several – no effort has been expended to require co-conspirators such as Jerome larkin to pay the taxes due!

Obamacare will be replaced by a new and possibly better health care plan – BUT IT WILL FAIL.   It will fail and become a disaster because there is a 700% fraud surcharge levied on health care services.   The new president as a businessman should address this problem if he wishes to make good on his promises!     

A good video on taking care of the elderly and making their final years fun

This  is why seniors centers are necessary and help seniors connect and have fun.

This is a heart warming video on taking care of the elderly in an excellent, thoughtful manner.  Other suggestions are pairing the elderly with college students where they life with the student in dorms (because dorms already are serving food and have exercise and athletic facilities and entertainment and parties) and pairing them in exchange for reduced room and board and tuition.  I think that’s a great idea.

From You Tube, Esta Varton herself tells of an abusive guardianship

This woman is clearly competent, so why was she guardianized?

Esta Varon tells us how she was placed in a mental institution and injected with drugs because her court appointed guardian Sam Rausman was going on vacation and did not want to leave her alone without an aide. She says she has been forced into an abusive situation by the courts appointment of a Sam Rausman as her guardian and says that the motto of the guardianship is to isolate, medicate and take the estate. Almost her entire life savings, including her home, has been depleted by this proceeding. Senior citizens beware!! http://www.stopguardianabuse.org

Does anyoe have any updates on this story?  How awful.

In Illinois–where to report abuse and/or neglect of a person

http://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item=32675

Now I’m not saying the authorities won’t do much or you might have to report it over and over until they do something, but reporting abuse and neglect is very important.

Persons with Mental Illness or Developmental Disability
OIG 24-hour Hotline 1-800-368-1463

To report abuse/neglect of persons with a mental illness or a developmental disability at a DHS-operated facility, call the OIG 24-hour Hotline 1-800-368-1463 Voice/TTY.

All other calls will be referred to the DHS Customer Help Line:

  • (800) 843-6154 English or Español
  • (800) 447-6404 TTY

Si usted sospecha que un individuo discapacitado ha sido abusado, descuidado o estafado económicamente, repórtelo a la Oficina del Inspector General del DHS al: 1-800-368-1463 Voz/TTY.

Todas las otras llamadas serán transferidas a la Línea de Ayuda para Clientes del DHS:

  • (800) 843-6154 inglés o español
  • (800) 447-6404 TTY

Other Allegations of Abuse/Neglect

For other allegations of abuse/neglect of individuals, please use the contact information below.

DHS Local Office Staff
Domestic Violence Help Line
  • Call toll free, Confidential, 24 Hour, Multilingual
    1-877-863-6338 (Voice)
    1-877-863-6339 (TTY)
Education of a Child
with Learning Disability
Elder Abuse
(not in a Nursing Home)
Abuse/Neglect of a person with a mental illness/developmental disability in a Domestic Setting
  • Adult Protective Services at 1-866-800-1409
Health Professionals
Hospitals or Nursing Homes
Human Rights Violation
Minors (children under 18)
National Human Trafficking Resource Center (NHTRC)
  • 24 Hour Hotline: 1-888-373-7888
  • If you or someone you know is a victim of human trafficking call now.

From Ken Ditkowsky–108 arrested in sex ring in Illinois, 752 across the US

Finally, the authorities appear to be cracking down on the sex rings that ruin primarily young girls and women.

I know personally they are a mess after having survived human trafficking and there is NO help whatsoever for them and they are heavily damaged.

http://abc7chicago.com/news/108-arrested-in-illinois-in-sex-sting;-752-arrested-across-us/1746351/

There are several building that everyone knows are filled with human trafficked people, and the authorities do nothing about it, but apparently the clouted and elite want their pretty women–even at the expense of ruining them.  Generally, it’s the aldermen and the DNC that are involved and they protect these disgusting life ruining businesses.  These young people should be in high school and college, not held against their will for sex for the rich and powerful.

We all know that DT has lawsuits and claims against him for rapes that occurred during paid sex, and there are sex rings that exist for the wealthy and famous.  But no young person should have to go through a rape.  It ruins them for life.  They can no longer function and society is left picking up the tab.

Thanks to ABC news for reporting on this and for the authorities trying to protect these young women and men.