Unknown's avatar

About Joanne M Denison

Former Patent and Trademark Attorney practicing in Chicago, Illinois accepting clients nationwide. We also did trademarks, general intellectual property and business litigation. See our website at www.DenisonLaw.com. Now suspended for 3 years by the Illinois Atty Regn and Disciplinary Commission for blogging about corruption and telling truths that the ARDC wants to cover up. And while I am doing that, I will continue on my blogging work. Now I work full time on court corruption and corruption at the ARDC and JIB (Illinois attorney and judge discipline boards)

From Ken Ditkowsky — Is Jerome Larkin our friend?

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 16, 2014 9:24 AM
To: “Mr. Lanre Amu — honest atty unfairly persecuted by ARDC”
Subject: Confronting the Demons

This morning my agenda requires me to finish the book DEATH OF THE ADVERSARY by Hans Keilson.
America gained its success by being a no-holds barred Nation wherein we wore our heart, our prejudices, our vanity, and our stupidity all on our sleeve and right out in the open.  It was a ‘love me, love my dog’ and if you did not like – tough turkey.
The immigrants who came to America bought into the scenario and joined in the politically incorrect melee.   We as a Nation were uncouth!    Today, the same bias exists except we are two faced and just as brutal as before, but we mask it with more hypocrisy.    Mr. Amu, the actions Mr. Larkin and the IARDC and their reports do a poor job in masking the racial bias manifest.   You are reacting to it as any American immigrant by spitting in Larkin’s face by telling him and his cronies that you are an African.
Like HELL!   you are an American!   Yes, you have an heritage that takes you back to somewhere in Africa, but, you are one of us!    That fact you cannot get away from and like or not when push comes to shove the legacy that you provide your children is the same as is provided to mine.   I want my children to grow up in an America that I can be proud of, not the America of the miscreants!
The America we decree to our children must not prey on the elderly, prey on the helpless, and it must not strip itself of honor, dignity, and our core values.   Our America cannot remain silent for a minute when public institutions exhibit racism, sexism, or dishonor.  I urge you to accept Bev Cooper’s offer and speak out today, tomorrow, Wednesday and everyday for the principles that you I and our brothers (including our sisters) stand for.    The fact that Jerome Larkin does not agree with them should not deter you in the slightest!   He is not your friend and he has demonstrated that he does not respect Rule of Law.   Lets revive our heritage and give the bad guys their due in spades, doubled and redoubled.  (yes I know that statement is not politically correct! – who give a damn)
Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

An open letter to Mr. Lanre Amu–stand up proud and report those who overlook, engage and promote unethical and immoral behavior in the courts!

Dear Readers;

This morning, Mr. Amu provide Ken Ditkowsky with a copy of his brief to the Ill. Supreme Court.  Atty Ditkowsky expressed his disappointment that Mr. Amu didn’t mention the most important right he has — and that is to unfettered non commercial speech under the First Amendment to the US constitution.  (Sawyer, Alvarez, Citizen’s United, etc.)  Apparently some people are telling him that if he “lays low”, goes along with the program, shuts up and does not mention “corruption” or the fact his judges have public records indicating reasons for their bias, or further investigate the root cause of the corruption which he alleges–all will be forgiven.

Then Mr. Amu says he will not go on the cable TV show “Cooper’s Corner” because it would further inflame his situation with the IARDC.

NOT.  This is the road to perdition.  The slippery slope. The wedge with the edge. It’s when the devil comes to you directly and says “do what I say and I’ll fix everything for you, I have the ‘easy’ button.”

The devil does not.  If he asks to you look the other way, do not speak, do not tell on miscreants and scallywags, it IS the road to perdition for sure.

You will note that JL, MS, SO, MG, LB, SA, etc. are NOT your friends.  In my case they have gone out of the way to tamper with witnesses and obstruct justice (Gloria and her service dog, Justine Sia Rosa and her testimony).  Ken and I are suing JL, AS, CF and PS for gross violations of our civil rights.  The IARDC is a slavish copyright infringer.  They can cite no case for “fair use” in litigation.  That is because the first amendment will run up head on with copyright laws.

jmho

JoAnne

Dear Lanre

I agree wholeheartedly with Ken.  You got some very, very bad advice where ever it came from.  You will note that in my trial I am using it as a showcase that the Sykes case was fixed and tied in, that there is a system of corruption that is ignored and even CYA by the IARDC, and right on up the ladder, that Gloria, Kathie, Scott and Yolanda will testify the case is filled with problems and issues and Mary was railroaded (no service, no discovery, ignoring Gloria’s POA and just issuing an order trashing it contrary to the ILPA sec. 45/2 which requires notice, a hearing and findings).

why are you shying away from the media anyway?  you are a smart, handsome, well spoken attorney and if you get on that show you will show the world you are NOT a nut case.

it would be one thing for you to go on the show DURING your trial to TALK about some witnesses when others still haven’t testified, but even then THE IARDC HAS NO RIGHT AND CANNOT CONSIDER YOUR MEDIA ENDEAVORS TO CLEAR YOUR GOOD NAME.

There are 2 amazing and important avenues of justice in this country.  One is the court system.  In your case, the IARDC has woefully failed you.  It was a kangaroo court making the decision ipso facto you are a liar and all the judges are saints.  What utter nonsense.  The second one is a free and open press.  Media can often put pressure on crooked govt officials to stop the nonsense.

And I don’t know who told you that advice (lay low, don’t tell, sweep the dirt under the rug), and perhaps you will not reveal it, but either the person is naive, young or stupid and should not be giving any sort of advice about IARDC proceedings OR HE IS A PLANT!

Both Ken and I have been “planted”.  That means a “nice attorney” will show up at our door or in our email box and tell me, you know if you only complied (take down the blog, shut up, stop emailing your elected politicians, the FBI, the states attorney, etc.–all the people I in fact have a duty to report to as an attorney), perhaps the IARDC will take pity on you and eventually give you your license back.

So that means I am to turn my back on corruption and harm to the disableds and elderly and poor?  Are they kidding?  Mestopheles has enough souls, kindly thank you very much.

Don’t you see how they are leading you into perdition?

You HAVE to report to the authorities–Misprison of Felony 18 USC 4 provides you have to report corruption.  As an Attorney, you should be pulling public and non public records and consulting with a good PI to investigate the corruption and get rid of it.  You should ask for a new trial based upon these judges are frauds and scallywags and their dirt was hidden and it took you awhile to find it.

If you don’t have a spine, take out a loan and get one, is my advice.

You do not have the right to be stupid in this lifetime (I’m sure you can find a biblical quote for that).  All the great leaders in the bible stood up to corruption–Ruth, David (as in the Goliath story).  He got his stones and threw them back.  The truth is the writing on the wall (OT) and the writing in the sand (Mary Magadalene was a saint and not a sinner and was wrongfully accused of adultery when a Roman soldier courted her and it turns out he had a wife and 3 kids in Rome.  The Mrs. wrote a letter to his commander so what did they try to do?  stone HER and not HIM.  It was not MM’s fault, she did not know.  Yeshua stopped that nonsense with the famous “writing in the sand.”)  All the heroes and heroines of the bible had one thing in common–they repeatedly stood up to corruption.  And they NEVER hid the fact they were going to expose it and eliminate it.  The three men in the fire survived their ordeal and you will too.  Ken and I will and we get to go back with all our tail feathers.  Don’t be a  wuss.

I know you have strong faith and convictions to do truth and justice.  You need to do prayer and meditation to get your answer and what I’m hearing right now is YOU NEED TO GO FOR IT!  Go full bore, media, blogging, your church groups for support–everywhere.  Beat the bushes and drum the drums.  Don’t hide that light of yours someplace to appease the IARDC and the Crook County Court system.

First step, do Ken and Bev’s show.  Go look at mine and Ken’s on YouTube

Bev and Ken are saints to do this week after week after week.

I also have disks for you. Bev, can you send Mr. Lanre as many disks as you can find of myself and Ken on your show?

Use what you can to fight this.  Doing so after the fact will weaken your position.

I send you all my best.  We are in this together.  WE ARE A formidable force when we band together.  My blog has 45,000 hits so far, Probate Sharks gets 70,000 per year, NASGA gets 140,000 and Janet Phelan just announced an amazing quarter million per post and she is actively posting on a regular basis statements about myself and Ken.  Gloria does protests outside the Daley Center and the probate court and attys know it and have seen it.

The secret is out.  The Code of Silence talked about in the Greylord books is gone.  We are now discussing billboards, print and other media ads, John Wyman has a book about all this corruption, Gloria is soon to finish a book/movie/documentary and is going to California momentarily.

The devil is a sexy, lusty temptress and her pretty red lips are whispering in your ear “don’t tell, don’t be mean to my friends, I will satisfy your desires.”  Don’t go lusting after that road.  It’s the wrong path.  Next thing you find, your wallet is gone, your wife and family hate you, you have a disease and it hurts to pee!

JoAnne

From Ken Ditkowsky on Limitations Period for Civil Rights actions

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 14, 2014 10:19 AM
To: Jo Anne M Denison , Tim NASGA , NASGA , probate sharks , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , Lawrence Hyman , “Mr. Lanre Amu — honest atty unfairly persecuted by ARDC” , GLORIA SYKES
Subject: Fw: WestlawNext – Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.

 
JoAnne,
 
Apparently the Supreme Court of the United States decisions are a nuisance to Stern, Farenga, Schmeidel.    The attached case holds that civil rights suits are governed by a 4 year Federal Statute of Limitations not the shortest State Statute.   In addition please note:
 
1. Legal Standard for Rule 12(b)(6) and Statute of Limitations
123 A defendant may raise the affirmative defense of statute of limitations via a Rule 12(b)(6) motion when the facts that give rise to the defense are clear from the face of the complaint. Smith–Haynie v. District of Columbia, 155 F.3d 575, 578 (D.C.Cir.1998). Because statute of limitations issues often depend on contested questions of fact, however, the court should hesitate to dismiss a complaint on statute of limitations grounds based solely on the face of the complaint. Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.Cir.1996). Rather, the court should grant a motion to dismiss only if the complaint on its face is conclusively time barred. Id.; Doe v. Dep’t of Justice, 753 F.2d 1092, 1115 (D.C.Cir.1985). If “no reasonable person could disagree on the date” on which the cause of action accrued, the court may dismiss a claim on statute of limitations grounds. Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456, 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).   Lewis v. Bayh, 577 F. Supp. 2d 47, 51 (D.D.C. 2008)
 
2.We thus hold that the Illinois five-year statute of limitations applies to statutory claims brought under the Civil Rights Acts. Jones v. Jones, 410 F.2d 365 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1013, 90 S.Ct. 547, 24 L.Ed.2d 505 (1970), is hereby overruled.   Beard v. Robinson, 563 F.2d 331, 338 (7th Cir. 1977)
 3.  Holdings: The Supreme Court, Justice Stevens, held that:
1 cause of action is governed by federal “catch-all” four-year statute of limitations if the claim was made possible by a post–1990 enactment, and
2 employees’ hostile work environment, wrongful termination, and failure-to-transfer claims were governed by federal “catch-all” limitations period.   Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 541 U.S. 369, 124 S. Ct. 1836, 158 L. Ed. 2d 645 (2004)
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky
 

From Ken Ditkowsky

In 1933 a funny looking no-account rose to power in Germany and by 1936 had International acceptance was a ‘world leader.’    In Russia a similar situation was occurring.  The world was fully informed of what was going to be tagged as the Holocaust, but, nothing was done.  Today, many countries exist with hostile neighbors on all sides and our Department of State overlooks hostile acts.   Americans watch, moan a bit, and contribute money to the very people who promulgate the outrage [munitions dealers].

 
Elder cleansing is not a new scenario.   The Bible reports incidents, do you think that our Churches do not know that some of their congregants are victims or family members of victims?   do you think that the ACLU is not aware of cases like Mary Sykes/Alice Gore etc?   Bev Cooper, Janet Phelan, Gloria Sykes, JoAnne Denison and many others have been screaming from the roof tops to law enforcement and others concerning the new American Holocaust.   An advertisement in a newspaper is talking to same dead audience that is refusing to go into a pro-active mode to protect their own individual First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights.
 
What did it take to get public interest in the NSA situation?    What is it taking to get public interest in the IRS targeting of conservative groups?    What is it taking *****.     Going back to 1936 – what did it take to get public interest in the wholesale killing of innocent civilians?
 
If I had the answer I would provide it.    That does not mean that your idea does not have merit and should not discussed; however, we need a pro-active approach with some sex appeal.  JoAnne and I have filed a Federal Civil Rights lawsuit against the two guardians, the administration of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois and the attorney for the miscreant plenary guardian in the Sykes case.    Previously Gloria filed an Americans with Disabilities case in Federal court alleging that these same defendants had deprived Mary Sykes of a citizens access to the Courts.  (The case was unsuccessful).    JoAnne and I are seeking to protect our parochial civil rights from the use by the miscreants of the ARDC to punish us for speaking out.   Many of us have written to elected officials and agencies such as the Justice Department and the Department of the Treasury.
 
We have an election coming up in November in which the stakes are very high for a bunch of public officials who would like to get re-elected.   In Illinois we have Senator Durbin.   Senator Durbin is famous for receiving a complaint from a citizen and his office sending a copy of a speech that he allegedly gave in Congress.   When I wrote him about Mary Sykes I got a copy of a speech he gave on Social Security.    Imagine what pro-active message we would send if we could defeat Durbin’s re-election bid.  Or on the other hand, if we could get Durbin to lead the fight for an HONEST complete, intelligent, and comprehensive investigation of these elder cleansing cases.   
 
 
This is not partisan political issue.   Senator Durbin could have one or more of our miscreants in his future!!   He could wind up lying in his own urine in a ***** nursing home.   The irony is the fact that everyone of us (including the miscreants themselves) could wind up in a ‘hell hole’ nursing home with one or more of the miscreants as a guardian to be elder cleansed! 
 
   
the foregoing notwithstanding it is very clear that Mr. Snowdon is not interested in leaking that information and the NSA is not monitoring our e-mails.  The request that we make is very modest – all we want is an HONEST intelligent, complete and comprehensive investigation!   The reaction is amazing.  The IARDC wants to suspend my license for four years for making such a suggestion and God knows what punishment they desire for JoAnne for publishing a blog that contains the suggestion of an HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation.    
Ken Ditkowsky

From Linda Kincaid — Info on World Conference on Guardianships

see below:

http://worldcongressguardianship.org/

The World Congress on Adult Guardianship will be held in Washington DC, May 28-30.  This event is the most important meeting this year for advocates such as ourselves.
The World Congress will discuss the both problems and solutions in guardianship.  There will be sessions on person centered care and the move from surrogate decision-making toward supported decision-making.  There will be discussion of rights in guardianship and recommendations for oversight of guardians.
There is a LOT we can learn and bring back to our communities.  We may have opportunities to share our own experiences and seek guidance from leaders in the field.
Bring an open mind and plenty of paper for taking notes.  Details in the attached brochure.
Linda
________________
Linda Kincaid, MPH

From Gloria–another important file portion missing!

see below, and if you know of the whereabouts of this file, please let Gloria know.

I suggested she contact the “help desk” and see if she can get it scanned in there and back online. I would do it for her, but I know she is fearful of all attorneys after my (bogus) disqualification and her subsequent treatment by them.

From: GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com
 Sent: Feb 7, 2014 8:38 AM
 To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com, kenditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com, Kathie Bakken <k_bakken@att.net, scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com
 Subject: Re: Illinois General Assembly – Full Text of HB4216
 
 The entire file from the petition for an order if protection June 9,  2009 is gone from the domestic relations court and never copied and or fully transferred to the probate court.
 
 I filed a petition for protective order against Carolyn Toerpe and Fred Toerpe in March/Feb of 2012 and The Toerpe’s showed up with an attorney in the Domestic Relations Court and got it transferred to the probate case 2008 p 4585 and I filed copies of the PO to be heard and no files are with  the probate court or the domestic relations court. Stuart ignored the filings. This was filed after the Toerpe’s pushed and shoved me during the first attempt for me to move out my property.
 
 The petition for an order of protection against Fred Toerpe filed at the Niles Courthouse after he beat me up in and about April 2012 was denied and now also missing from the files.
 
 And finally the criminal complaint against Fred Toerpe filed by the Cook County States Attorneys office and to be heard march 11, 2013 is listed but with no case number and the files with the complaint I signed and with police reports are missing in its entirety. That the case was never given a case number and I was shuffled off to sit in the wrong courtroom and Toerpe’s representation was a recent Cook County states attorney who just left the CCSA office, and the CCSA said I was not in court and again was said to be transferred to the probate division. That all these public records and case filings are missing and point to The Toerpe’s who are holding my mother hostage under a court sanctioned guardianship should be of serious interest as the destruction of said documents are a felony.
 
 And you JD want to know why what I sent is important which draws me to the conclusion you simply don’t get it!!!
 
 These people including the court have destroyed court files which are public documents that point directly to Carolyn Toerpe’s criminal behavior as a disreputable person who upon an agreed order appointing her guardian of my mother is in violation of the Probate act and law enforcement cares little…
 
 That I’ve been accused of everything and every wrong doing Toerpe perpetrated including destroying the files should be of interest to the Tribunal that the missing records evidence Toerpe is a dangerous person who is protected by the courts, the states attorneys office and the IARDC. .
 
Gloria Jean Sykes, from her I phone.

 

 
98TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2013 and 2014
HB4216

 

Introduced , by Rep. Anthony DeLuca

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 

 

50 ILCS 205/4   from Ch. 116, par. 43.104
    Amends the Local Records Act. Provides that any person who knowingly, without lawful authority and with the intent to defraud any party, public officer, or entity, alters, destroys, defaces, removes, or conceals any public record commits a Class 4 felony.
 

Another great article on the Situation in Probate, Cook County from a wonderful reporter

Please google :”no country for old men probate article” and scroll down.

This blog makes inroads to the fact that guardianships far too many times ARE NOT WORKING.  They drain estates, they stir up troubles in families for fees from persons tied into the system, and they subject to just as many abuses than if the person had been let alone.  The Sykes case is a classic example of railroading, no jurisdiction, sisters not served, a $272k bank account of Gloria’s frozen under a TRO lasting for 150 ten day terms, a $400k home in Norwood Park laid to waste for 4 years, one sister evicting another sister from the family home, it now appears the $272 bank account will mostly go to Schmeidel who has a $200k plus legal bill on the estate.  Mary will go to a nursing home, even though her POA was summarily invalidated without due process, briefings and a hearing and findings.

I have updated my famous table of “torts”, but the IARDC doesn’t like the words “corruption”, “tort” or whatever so now it will be a table of pain, woes and agonies–for Gloria.

Gloria, Kathie Baken, Scott Evans and Yolanda Bakken have their side of the story and this blog has the right to publish that.  The miscreants (whom ever they are–there has been no investigation, but we know AS, CF and PS never told the court the appointed plenary guardian never drilled out the safe deposit box in April 2010)

The GAL’s and PS have told their story on the transcripts published on this blog. They are welcome to provide this blog with their comments, observations and more of their side of the story, but their side of the story is fairly present on the transcripts.

It’s been a very tough road for Gloria, Yolanda, Scott and Kathie. Let’s keep them in our thoughts and prayers

Immediate Funding/Office Space Needed for our new charity–Justice4 Every1, NFP

Please call your friends today and see if you can find me office space.  I need it reasonably priced, and the landlord must be flexible on rent OR in need of legal or other services in exchange (I teach violin, keyboard and crocheting).

While I am busy helping numerous people per day, I do need office space to take on pro bono clients and put together their packets for the authorities and refer them to local counsel.

The work we do is important and it fights the troubles, issues and problems (TIPS) in probate!

I now have a staff of 5 people I would like to thank–Alyece Russell, Jim Simms, Michael Nofsinger and Ginny Johnson of Ginny O’s who are also working hard with me to get funding, help various people with their probate and TIPS problems, and provide support and strength for these often long and expensive battles.

So please contact your Chicago Realtor and Broker friends today and we will scour the neighborhoods for office space which is a better fit for me today!

JoAnne

From Tim Lahrman, why is the process so different in Probate?

From: timlahrman@aol.com
Sent: Feb 6, 2014 11:56 AM
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com, gloami@msn.com, JoAnne@justice4every1.com
Cc: NASGA.org@gmail.com, verenusl@gmail.com, statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov, illinois.ardc@gmail.com, ACLU@ACLU.ORG
Subject: Re: let me suggest: if there are any Judges that think the elder cleansing cases are violating the principle stated in this case

 

in the administration and supervision of a guardianship, the judge is performing a ministerial duty and function — supervising the judges own agent.
may I also suggest that judges are not free to expand the defined class of persons intended to be served by the guardianship statutes, and do so by judicial fiat —  but it is being done all the time by these judges that believe simply being old is good enough reason to appoint a guardian.
one last thing I want to point out here — the civil practice of law —- the procedure by which a court views the process — as civil law is practiced routinely and customarily —- as applied to guardianship —– is unconstitutional because the policies, practices and procedures create a unconstitutional presumption of incompetence/incapacity …….  think about,
a petition is filed —–
in normal practice an attorney would likely file a motion to dismiss —– the court would then read the petition as presumptively true
and the burden would then be on the proposed ward to stop the machine —-  except that the proposed ward is already presumed to be incompetent/incapacitated/disabled.
add to this the fact the ward will MORE THAN LIKELY NEVER have access to a review and appeal process —–
and guardianship is a proving ground for fraud ….
From Tim Lahrman, a probate victim himself, and one who is now dedicated to helping others, he hears these stories all the time, as I do.
And I have to agree with Tim.  Normal court procedure is a Complaint, followed by strenuous Motions to Dismiss, briefing schedules, hearings, then discovery, then depositions, then expert discovery and depositions, then trial on the merits.
I would have to say this process is skipped in probate about 90% of the time, and yet the process completely strips away human rights and liberties.
JoAnne

From KDD–where is the outcry against “Elder Cleansings?”

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 5, 2014 9:11 AM
To: Cook County States Attorney , Eric Holder , “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” , Edward Carter , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , “fox2newsdesk@foxtv.com” , “foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com” , Chicago FBI , “chicagotonight@wttw.com” , Tim NASGA , NASGA , probate sharks
Cc: Jo Anne M Denison , GLORIA SYKES , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , Tim NASGA , Janet Phelan
Subject: CORRUPTION

 Special Prosecutor Dan Webb wrote a report in which he disclosed serious favoritism that occurred with Mayor Daley’s nephew was involved in the death of another individual.   The nephew pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter.    Almost Daily the media is drawing conclusions concerning the transaction that suggest that we have two classes of people in Cook County, i.e. the political royals and the rest of us.
Gloria Sykes, Bev and Ken Cooper, the two Mary’s, John Wyman, Steven Schwartz and dozens of others have written to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission concerning the ‘railroading’ exploitation, and deprivation of liberties of senior citizens (elder cleansing) by a small group of lawyers and judges.   Like the infamy that Special Prosecutor Webb disclosed the very people who are paid substantial public money to protect the public and the concept of equal protection of the law are totally disinterested when the political royals are involved.
Mary Sykes was not on a drinking spree on Rush Street!   She and the other victims of elder cleansings were totally innocent.   Mary was using the Courts to seek a protective order from the very person who was appointed her plenary guardian.   So obscene is the perfidy that is disclosed in the Sykes case 09 P 45 85 (Circuit Court of Cook County) that to ‘cover up’ the actions of the miscreants that Mary’s daughter was chained right in the court house and intimidated with threats of terrible consequences unless she *****.  Attorneys who were not scared off with threats (such as JoAnne Denison and myself) are being prosecuted for doing such terrible things as calling for an HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation of the elder cleansings and the fact that citizen complaints are not investigated as the list of victims grows.
It may not be good press to make public the fact that dozens of senior citizens across the United States are being herded into abusive guardianships and denied their basic liberties as they are stripped of their savings for the benefit of a few miscreant “judicial officials”
The drain of the treasury continues daily to the detriment of the public.
Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Some Judges just need an award for outstanding efforts–Here comes “Bully on the Bench”

 

From an attorney who wishes to remain anonymous (he has more than a few submissions)

BULLY ON THE BENCH,  a weekly activist show heard around the world….

Every week we want to hear about a Bully-On-The-Bench ™ .  The “winning” Bully will be awarded a certificate suitable for framing. (We will not provide frames; but what judge would not be proud to display such a distinguished award on their “I love me wall”.)  We would like to personally award the certificate in a photo op; but as those of us on the Cook County “judicial terrorist watch list” know, the odds of doing that more than once will probably result in false criminal charges.

 

Join us on the Radio every Friday from 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM.  So far the radio station is very pleased with our listener base and our callers.  (Last week we had listeners from the Czech Republic and Germany – don’t ask me why, guess they are just radicals.)  We need you to tune in and call to keep the show going.  I know they have us set up for Facebook and probably those other social media things.  (I need to really learn all that stuff.)  And I will let you know as I know.

 

Remember, this radio station is an activist radio station.  They do not shy away from controversy.

 

So call in to 773-217-8344.

 

In Chicago, they are on the radio dial at 1710 AM (also streams on the internet at:  www.que4.org for those in the Czech Republic and Germany, or where ever you are.)

 

As always, the show will be controversial.  If you get a busy signal, it just means that all the lines are full.  Wait a few minutes and call back.  We want to hear what you have to say.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by jmdenison. Bookmark the permalink.

Just in — Hurray for Dorothy Brown–efiling in Probate!

Just in — Hurray for Dorothy Brown–efiling in Probate!

Let’s give the clerk 10 gold stars for non corruption today!

There is absolutely nothing more assuring and satisfying that e-filing!  It’s a huge step in the right direction.

Now we just have to get the documents loaded up on the internet for the public to view and download for a RESONABLE COST, similar to Pacer (the system used in Federal Court across the nation) for 8 cents per page, but I guess that can wait for next month.

We have demanded this, and it has come.  Thanks so much to the Clerk and Presiding Judge.  Now you can demand that they be put online and printed out for 8 cents per page–just like Pacer.

The public owns these documents and not Cook County.  We deserve immediate and reasonable access to all court filings and we should insist on just that!

The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County launched eFiling in the Probate Division on Wednesday, January 29th bringing the this service to six out of the seven civil case types in the Cook County Circuit Court.

 
eFiling is now available in the Child Support, Chancery, Civil, Domestic Relations, Law and Probate Divisions.
 
For more information visit: www.cookcountyclerkofcourt.org
 

From Ken Ditkowsky, how Mr. Sanders and his brother are suffering

Joanne M Denison's avatarMaryGSykes.com

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 3, 2014 3:03 PM
To: , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk , Jo Anne M Denison , Tim NASGA , “ACLU@ACLU.ORG” , NASGA , probate sharks , rudy bush , GLORIA SYKES , Edward Carter , Cook County States Attorney , “staterep-constance-a-howard@comcast.net” , “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” , “foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com” , “fox2newsdesk@foxtv.com”
Cc: Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , GLORIA SYKES , scott evans , Tim NASGA
Subject: Re: Letter about Robert Alan Sanders’ imprisonment in a nursing home.

[this was in response to a detailed report from Mr. Garr Sanders regarding his brother’s condition in a nursing home.  The Sanders brothers are still in need of your prayers and support as they are kept apart from one another.  You can see their story on NASGA at
 
 
The incident that you are describing is surreal.   Unfortunately it fits the pattern of most of…

View original post 377 more words

From Ken Ditkowsky, how Mr. Sanders and his brother are suffering

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 3, 2014 3:03 PM
To: , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk , Jo Anne M Denison , Tim NASGA , “ACLU@ACLU.ORG” , NASGA , probate sharks , rudy bush , GLORIA SYKES , Edward Carter , Cook County States Attorney , “staterep-constance-a-howard@comcast.net” , “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” , “foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com” , “fox2newsdesk@foxtv.com”
Cc: Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , GLORIA SYKES , scott evans , Tim NASGA
Subject: Re: Letter about Robert Alan Sanders’ imprisonment in a nursing home.

[this was in response to a detailed report from Mr. Garr Sanders regarding his brother’s condition in a nursing home.  The Sanders brothers are still in need of your prayers and support as they are kept apart from one another.  You can see their story on NASGA at
 
 
The incident that you are describing is surreal.   Unfortunately it fits the pattern of most of the ‘elder cleansing’ cases.   It also fits the pattern that the Illinois legislature and that of every single State of the Union seeks to eliminate.
 
Once again I invite law enforcement to not believe a single word that is written by you or by me.   Do an independent intelligent HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation.   If you find that the statements that we make have credibility then we pray that you (law enforcement) impanel and grand jury and being the miscreants to the Bar of justice.   As our government is going broke over health care costs – the miscreants should be requested to pay back to the government every single penny that they obtained for the mistreatment of the very people who they are licensed to help.    
 
As outrageous conduct such as you describe cannot exist without 18 USCA 371 violations by attorneys you should report the attorneys to the local disciplinary commission and the judges who aid and abet this action to the local Judicial Inquiry Boards.  
 
The Illinois model (755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq) guardianship statute is in force in most of the States of the Union.  Each legislature has made it clear that guardianship is not a sentence of death.  The guardianship is supposed to supply to the disabled person the help that he cannot furnish himself ( 11a – 3(b))    Over-reaching is prohibited and clearly prohibited; however, in cases like Sykes and Gore we see large estates ravaged and the alleged disabled stripped of his/her humanity, liberty, property and human rights.  Reports to law enforcement to comply with 18 USCA 4 and to protect the rights Congress has required government to protect pursuant 42 USCA 1983 are not protected.
 
The watchdog commissions over lawyers and judges are the first line of defense as we cannot have our own local national socialists and Stalinists  use the authority of Buck vs. Bell to create a holocaust of senior citizens.  (Maybe Mr. Larkin the administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission can help you in referring you to the people in your state who are dedicated to the defense of the Bill of Rights!)     
 
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky

How NOT to do a TRO

Joanne M Denison's avatarJustice for Everyone Blog

A great source of information is:

Click to access Ch9_final_txt.pdf

In the Sykes case, Gloria was not present in court, and PS got an Order issued regarding her TRO.

However, it did not comply with the Rules of Court:

e. Under Illinois and federal law (735 ILCS 5/11-101 and FRCP 65(b)) any order granting an ex parte TRO must:
i. be endorsed with the date and hour of signing
ii. be filed immediately in the clerk’s office
iii. define the injury and state why it is irreparable
iv. explain why no notice was given
v. expire by its own terms, not to exceed 10 days
vi. set the motion for a preliminary injunction for hearing at the earliest possible time

and what happened was, Gloria showed up on or about Mar 18, 2011 and was sandbagged and handcuffed to a chair in Judge Stuart’s ante room for THREE HOURS.

There…

View original post 161 more words

Call for Whistleblower Attorneys!

Joanne M Denison's avatarJustice for Everyone Blog

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Feb 2, 2014 8:12 AM
To: “Kenneth Ditkowsky [Ditkowsky Law]” , “ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com” , NASGA , probate sharks , “acluofillinois@aclu-il.org” , “ACLU@ACLU.ORG”
Subject: Re: FYI Whistleblowers attorneys Kline and Specter

 
Thank you.
 
Unfortunately there is no shortage of cases.  These cases are important and are fuel that keeps elder cleansing alive, but, they are all distractions – except to the victims, their families and the miscreants who obtain a few dollars.
 
The problem is that there are levels of corruptors.   At the bottom we have the bottom feeders.  In the Sykes case we have our miscreant friends.  The next level up consists of friendly judges, regulators, and assorted attorney who would sell their souls for a buck.   These individuals are visible and the ones who get sued and are expendable.   Mr. Stern as an example is a pawn.   Everyone but he is fully aware of it.    (Yes, if he…

View original post 597 more words

From Gloria, her views on the case and her mother’s status

Joanne M Denison's avatarJustice for Everyone Blog

Image

 

—–Original Message—–
From: GLORIA Jean SYKES
Sent: Jan 30, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Cynthia GAL , Adamm Stern GAL
Subject: Toerpe fails to provide adequate care for my Mother..

and this constitutes “causing death”: the ‘slayer statute” is titled, “Person causing death”  The statute bars “a person who intentionally and unjustifiably causes the death of another” from receiving “any property, benefit, or other interest by reason of the death.” The determination of whether a person has actually “intentionally and unjustifiably” caused the death of another can be made “by any court of competent jurisdiction separate and apart from any criminal proceeding arising from the death: however, as you, me, and the thousands of people who read the MaryGSykes blog, or are part of the hundreds of people I am associated with daily, it is known that Judge Jane Louise Stuart — ignores all case law(s) and

View original post 1,602 more words

Another article on Humana–the strange inability to cancel

Dear Readers;

As you know, SR has filed a civil action against Humana in ND Illinois Federal Court and we are waiting to see what the judge will say about dismissing our complaint against this mega-insurance corp that has every lawyer in the world to make sure our complaint does not succeed and that we cannot proceed further to sue for damages when a 90 year old man was left without stroke rehab for 21 days while the claim was appealed and he suffered and is now in a nursing home.

In comes more reports of problems with Humana:

http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/i-team-experts-say-court-approved-sale-was-below-market-value

The consensus so far is to drop the Advantage programs–they are in fact no advantage at all and to go with simple Medicare, which appears to have fewer problems.

This is a good and interesting read.

JoAnne

First Portion of Trial Over–Plaintiff Rests!

Dear Readers;

After a grueling week of trial, it’s finally over and I am amazingly relieved.  It was hard work and as you know I could not find an attorney.  I advertised repeatedly on this blog, I emailed every “ARDC defense” attorney on their list, BUT I AM THE ONLY ATTORNEY WILLING TO DO THIS WORK, WELL, MYSELF AND KEN, AND KEN WAS DISQUALIFIED.

I will not be publishing about the details of the trial until a decision is made, we will be filing motions to strike exhibits (no foundation or authentication) and a Motion for a Directed Finding, because I don’t believe Mr. Larkin has proved I was lying or that there is no jurisdiction, Mary wasn’t served, the sisters were never served (Yolanda is furious), numerous procedures were never followed (and many ARDC witnesses even testified to them, what a CITATION TO DISCOVER ASSETS was, what  CITATION TO RECOVER ASSETS WAS, what a PETITION TO DRILL A SAFE DEPOSIT BOX was; what a section 2-1401 petition was.

AND A HUGE, HUGE, THANKS TO ALYECE FOR ALL HER DEDICATED WORK HELP AND SUPPORT.

Aleyce Russell is the secretary/treasurer of Justice 4 Every1, NFP and she was an angel to drive up from South Carolina and come here to assist me and support me at trial.

It was wonderful.

Mr. Larkin has rested, so now I get to put on my case and that will be Mar. 10th and 11th at 9:30 am each day.  Uuugh.  It’s hard enough to get to the backfilled area and now he’s shooting for 9:30 which means to drive there I have to be out the door at 8 am, battle the worst traffic of the day to get to the Pru Plaza by 9:30 am.

BUT I do this all for YOU, my most beloved probate victims.  I know and see how unfair and unjust it is in some cases and I am most committed to you.  I will do a trial for a week for you, and then I will do 2 more days of trial for you.  I don’t care.  I am here to tell the truth, be the truth and spread the truth because I want to be proud of our nation’s court system and lawyers admitted to the Illinois bar.

There is something truly amiss and seriously wrong right now in the Sykes case.  I have published the facts, the pleadings, the witness reports and their declarations (Gloria, Scott, Yolanda, Kathie, Tim, Judy Ditkowsky and others who have come to court, come to trial and blogged and taken notes to ensure fairness and justice via the media.

While the judges can’t read the news about the cases before them, the lawyers can. They can see their reflections in the mirror.

I don’t have any money, I don’t know if I can even keep my office, but I’m not going to stop and I’m not going to quit.  I have several new cases I have to catch up on from last week, so if anyone can make some donations, that is appreciated.  If you can’t then I send you peace and blessings and financial healing.

JoAnne

Trial is here and now–130 E Randolph St, 8th floor, bring an ID

While we are actively taking notes and blogging during this trial, the Chair has asked me to post a statement that I will blog about witness testimony, but those posts will not appear until trial is over and we reach closing arguments.

 

I didn’t put it on a prior post (which I can’t find now) because the purpose of that post was only to make everyone aware that we would be taking notes (blogging) and those would eventually get posted.

The rule is, witnesses must be sequestered during a trial so they don’t talk among themselves and change their testimony.

The Chair wanted me to make it clear that was not going to happen.  There is the rule of “witness squestration” so witnesses don’t compare notes and change testimony.

He wanted to make that clear.

Fine by me.  Come on by and see what is going on.  It is very interesting.

joanne

From Atty Margaret Dore–is assisted suicide for the elderly a good thing

Some articles to consider:

Actually, I am heavily involved in the assisted suicide issue, which takes abuse to a whole new level.  My blogs/website include Choice is an Illusion, which is undergoing a face lift, and Montanans Against Assisted Suicide.

Here’s a short article regarding some of the problems:  http://www.choiceillusion.org/2014/01/washingtons-assisted-suicide-act.html   This is a court case that I’m involved in:  http://www.montanansagainstassistedsuicide.org/2013/12/judge-hears-assisted-suicide-arguments.html

and while I am not a proponent of suicide, I do believe that a senior can self administer any and all pain meds they need, and if they want to refuse artificial life sustaining machines, that is fine also.  That’s JMHO.

 

joanne

Mrs. Bradwell. “no precedent, no English precedent and no necessity” “unsuited to many occupations in civil life” “timid and delicate” — what will happen on Tuesday

You know, I cannot, for the life of me, reconcile the fact that I must appear before the IARDC and explain this blog and how it helps the public and all of you.  KDD cites Buck vs. Bell (sterilize the stupid which was later utilized to support Hitler’s “work camps” Albreit mach Frei or Work will Set you Free) and Dred Scott (AA’s are property).  But there are more important decisions the IARDC can cite for me.

From the NY bar we can learn something:

(nycbar.org thank you– you have inspired me and I blame you for all of this)

Women as Lawyers

In Maryland, Margaret Brent, arrived in the new country in 1638, received a land grant in St, Mary’s City and subsequently handled legal matters for Governor Calvert. It wasn’t until 1869 that a women, Belle Mansfield, (pictured at left) from Iowa, became the first attorney licensed to practice law in the United States. In the same year, Myra Bradwell from Illinois was denied admission to the state bar on the basis of her sex. Also in 1869, Lemma Barkaloo became the first women law student in the nation, attending Washington University in St. Louis after being refused admission to the Law School at Columbia. The following year, Ada Kepley, became the first women to earn a formal law degree in the United States, graduating with an LL.B. from Union College of Law in Chicago, now known as Northwestern University. Katherine “Kate” Stoneman became the first woman admitted to practice law in New York. She did so against enormous odds; supporting herself as a teacher and working nights, weekends, and summers as a clerk to an Albany lawyer until she graduated in 1898. She was the first woman to pass the New York State Bar Exam, but her application to join the bar was rejected because of her gender. The reason given by the three Supreme Court justices who denied her admission were “No precedent,” “No English precedent,” and “No necessity.” She then launched a successful campaign to amend the Code of Civil Procedure to permit the admission of qualified applicants without regard to sex or race. These and many other pioneering women have built the foundation for equality in the legal profession. According to the 2005 ABA Commission on Women in the Profession, women represented almost 30% of practicing attorneys and over 47% of new students entering law school.

In the matter of the application of Mrs. Myra Bradwell for a license to practice law, 1869
55 Illinois Reports 536, 1869-1870

In 1869, Myra Bradwell (pictured at left) passed the Illinois Bar Exam with honors. She then applied to the Illinois Supreme court for admission to the bar. The court refused her application because she was a woman. The decision was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bradwell v. Illinois despite Bradwells’s argument based on the Immunities and Privileges Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which says: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. The opinion of Justice Bradley in the case reflected the nineteenth century society belief about women not participating in the workforce, “Man is, or should be, woman’s protector and defender. The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life.” Eventually, Illinois changed the rules for admitting women to the bar. In 1890, Bradwell was admitted to the Illinois bar and in 1892, she received a license to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Maryland, Margaret Brent, arrived in the new country in 1638, received a land grant in St, Mary’s City and subsequently handled legal matters for Governor Calvert. It wasn’t until 1869 that a women, Belle Mansfield, (pictured at left) from Iowa, became the first attorney licensed to practice law in the United States. In the same year, Myra Bradwell from Illinois was denied admission to the state bar on the basis of her sex. Also in 1869, Lemma Barkaloo became the first women law student in the nation, attending Washington University in St. Louis after being refused admission to the Law School at Columbia. The following year, Ada Kepley, became the first women to earn a formal law degree in the United States, graduating with an LL.B. from Union College of Law in Chicago, now known as Northwestern University. Katherine “Kate” Stoneman became the first woman admitted to practice law in New York. She did so against enormous odds; supporting herself as a teacher and working nights, weekends, and summers as a clerk to an Albany lawyer until she graduated in 1898. She was the first woman to pass the New York State Bar Exam, but her application to join the bar was rejected because of her gender. The reason given by the three Supreme Court justices who denied her admission were “No precedent,” “No English precedent,” and “No necessity.” She then launched a successful campaign to amend the Code of Civil Procedure to permit the admission of qualified applicants without regard to sex or race. These and many other pioneering women have built the foundation for equality in the legal profession. According to the 2005 ABA Commission on Women in the Profession, women represented almost 30% of practicing attorneys and over 47% of new students entering law school.

In the matter of the application of Mrs. Myra Bradwell for a license to practice law, 1869
55 Illinois Reports 536, 1869-1870

In 1869, Myra Bradwell (pictured at left) passed the Illinois Bar Exam with honors. She then applied to the Illinois Supreme court for admission to the bar. The court refused her application because she was a woman. The decision was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bradwell v. Illinois despite Bradwells’s argument based on the Immunities and Privileges Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which says: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. The opinion of Justice Bradley in the case reflected the nineteenth century society belief about women not participating in the workforce, “Man is, or should be, woman’s protector and defender. The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life.” Eventually, Illinois changed the rules for admitting women to the bar. In 1890, Bradwell was admitted to the Illinois bar and in 1892, she received a license to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court.

If the Tribunal declares I am “unsuited to many occupations in civil life due to my gender” I guess I must be sorry for that and hold the Tribunal in high esteem.

Got that.

Will never happen.

JoAnne

From Lanre Amu–his brief to the Sup. Ct. of Illinois

We are pleased to announce that Mr. Amu has filed his brief with SCOI and is kind enough to share it with us:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwa2trWEJYbkU4ek0/edit?usp=sharing

I think he did an excellent job this time of pointing out how difficult it is to convict anyone of political speech.  In his brief he makes it clear that discussion and discourse is essential to a vital and free society.

Kudos to him and let’s hope the briefs are well taken by SCOI.

These two lawyers (Mr. Amu and Ditkowsky) did not steal anything, they betrayed no client confidences, they did absolutely nothing wrong.

Rather, the IARDC has now entered into a campaign to defame and libel these two very good and honorable men by taking the approach (which is not legally permissible via dozens of SCOTUS cases), that “judges are perfect, judges can do no wrong, judges never have bad ideas”.

We know that is not true from Greylord and reading the Greylord books, the feds knew that plenty of hanky panky was going on in the upper case divisions too where the money is quite serious–law division, probate and chancery, but they knew they could not simply make up cases, it would be near impossible for any atty to bust out that system and wear a wire.

But now the hanky panky and shennagins have become soooo serious, and the internet connects us all together in a way never before seen, such that hiding this hanky panky and covering it up, Mr. IARDC is near impossible.

I hear complaints each and every day about new cases, so does the staff at NASGA and believe me, we talk all the time, comparing stories and putting together the pieces.

Then we turn it over to the authorities.

And I don’t care about criminal this or that, I am not a criminal lawyer and have absolutely no interest in that.  I think civil lawsuits are just as effective, if not more effective.

I have now trashed my entire law practice to dedicate my life to putting together the pieces and stopping the nonsense in court.  Our nation’s court systems should not be a playground for the powers that be and money grabbing simply because the other side is infirm and cannot speak for themselves.

Next week the IARDC will be after me for lying on this blog. I have no less than 6 character witnesses and 6 expert witnesses that say this is not true and more blogs like mine are needed and not fewer.  So what does the IARDC do?  they strike my expert witnesses saying they are “not experts” when in fact, the 9th circuit has just said that bloggers get the same First Amendment protections as do professional journalists.

Am I not a woman, said Soujourner Truth.

JoAnne

 

The truth about guardianships — from another Attorney, no less

Read what Atty Margaret Dore has to say about guardianships in Seattle:

http://nasga-stopguardianabuse.blogspot.com/2014/01/10-reasons-people-get-railroaded-into.html

It’s interesting that the title is about railroading seniors into guardianships, is it not?

Again, this blog speaks the truth and it’s not the only source out there that is giving you, the public the truth about probate courts, in Illinois and across the nation.

Thank you Ms. Margaret Dore for your honest thoughts and comments.

JoAnne

9th circuit agrees: bloggers have same 1st Amendment Protections as Professional Journalists

And in a great case found by Judy Ditkowsky (thanks so much), we now know that the 9th circuit says us bloggers get the same First Amendment Protections as conventional professional journalists.

Read on.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-usa-blogger-ruling-20140117,0,7794290.story

Now, the question is, whether my Tribunal agrees, and if they think that a private citizen who happens to have a law license, will be protected by our beloved First Amendment when she faces disciplinary proceedings for blogging.

 

Oh my, there’s blogging going on in the courtroom, what will we do?

 

I would vote the Tribunal should just reread the First Amendment, but that’s IMHO.

JoAnne

New Illinois POA forms in wordperfect and word, ready to use

 

See below, these reflect the statutory changes since 2011.

these are pretty good, but you might want to put in there you don’t ever want to be isolated from your children/grandchildren and name them all. It might help, I don’t know.

POA Health Care:

In Wordperfect

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwR3Y4WUxPRllQeTQ/edit?usp=sharing

In MS Word

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwZjQ3Qzl3SnFuUTg/edit?usp=sharing

POA Property

In Wordperfect

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwaW41eVJkYnFSUDA/edit?usp=sharing

In MS Word

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwNkktLUNRX1EwVDQ/edit?usp=sharing