From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Sep 8, 2014 12:01 PM
To: “Dr. Sam Sugar” , Tim Lahrman
Subject: Re: Malpractice

From Lane v. Franks where an employer fired an employee for testifying against him when he was engaged in fraud, is the sworn testimony protected speech or ordinary speech?  SCOTUS held:

Lane’s sworn testimony outside the scope of his ordinary job duties is entitled to First Amendment protection. Pp. 6–13.
(a) Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty., 391 U. S. 563, 568, requires balancing “the interests of the[employee], as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.”Under the first step of the Pickering analysis, if the speech is made pursuant to the employee’s ordinary job duties, then the employee isnot speaking as a citizen for First Amendment purposes, and the inquiry ends. Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U. S. 410, 421. But if the “employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern,” the inquiryturns to “whether the relevant government entity had an adequatejustification for treating the employee differently from any other member of the general public.” Id., at 418. Pp. 6–8.
(b) Lane’s testimony is speech as a citizen on a matter of public concern. Pp. 8–12.
(1) Sworn testimony in judicial proceedings is a quintessential example of citizen speech for the simple reason that anyone who testifies in court bears an obligation, to the court and society at large, to tell the truth. That obligation is distinct and independent from any separate obligations a testifying public employee might have to his employer. The Eleventh Circuit read Garcetti far too broadly in holding that Lane did not speak as a citizen when he testified simply because he learned of the subject matter of that testimony in the course of his employment. Garcetti said nothing about speech that relates to public employment or concerns information learned in the course of that employment. The critical question under Garcetti is whether the speech at issue is itself ordinarily within the scope of an employee’s duties, not whether it merely concerns those duties. Indeed, speech by public employees on subject matter related to their employment holds special value precisely because those employees gain knowledge of matters of public concern through their employment. Pp. 9–11.
(2) Whether speech is a matter of public concern turns on the “content, form, and context” of the speech. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147–148. Here, corruption in a public program and misuseof state funds obviously involve matters of significant public concern. See Garcetti, 547 U. S., at 425. And the form and context of the speech—sworn testimony in a judicial proceeding—fortify that conclusion. See United States v. Alvarez, 567 U. S. ___, ___. Pp. 11–12.
(c)
Turning to Pickering’s second step, the employer’s side of the scale is entirely empty. Respondents do not assert, and cannot demonstrate, any government interest that tips the balance in their favor—for instance, evidence that Lane’s testimony was false or errorenousor that Lane unnecessarily disclosed sensitive, confidential, orprivileged information while testifying. Pp. 12–13.

Interestingly enough, an even more important question is whether the employee could seek damages from the employer and the government agency because could the employer have held a reasonable belief that his action was protected.  That, it turns out was a  question for another day because it was not part of the brief submitted to SCOTUS.

Nonetheless, the decision by SCOTUS was unanimous that government employees when speaking out against corruption do have First Amendment protection.

Ken’s Writ of Cert. has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Approximately 4,000+ Writs for Certiorari are submitted.  Only about 300 get a decision, with about 100 summary confirmations, another 100 short or slip opinions, and only around 70 get a full blown opinion.  Let’s hope and pray that Ken’s brief is considered and the decision of the ARDC dismissed on grounds similar to Lane v. Franks.

Read the entire opinion here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwVm03ZnBSWi1VdWs/edit?usp=sharing

The decision was unanimous and I think SCOTUS makes it clear that when speaking of corruption, very wide berth must be given to one’s First Amendment rights.

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Sep 7, 2014 4:20 PM
To: Barbara Stone , “JoAnne M. Denison”
Subject: The War on the elderly and the disabiled – and in particular the ultra vires assault on Barbara Stone

Barbara Stone:

The Americans with Disabilities Act applies to all persons with disabilities in that it levels the playing field   for the disabled by requiring reasonable accommodation of person so that they will not be deprived of their ‘core’ privileges and immunities.   I refer you to the U.S. Department of Justice Publication entitled Commonly Asked Questions about the Americans With Disabilities Act and Law Enforcement .

As you have read in the GAO Report to Congress and numerous other publications persons appointed as guardians have been noted to have been miscreant in the manner in which they have carried out their duties.     The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that the guardian and the Court make a reasonable accommodation for the disabled person.     This is not a license to separate the disabled person from his/her prior life, bar family from having social intercourse with her, or exploit her.     In too many cases the guardian acts (with the Probate Court attornment) entirely contrary to the mandate of the act.     In such cases 18 USCA 4 requires that such conduct be reported to law enforcement.      It is my opinion that such conduct whether approved by a judge or not is a very serious matter and an assault on the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Cons titution.

I find the information that you have related to me to be extremely disturbing and I have forwarded the same to Attorney General Eric Holder.      If the guardians and/or the attorneys for the guardian do not know what disability your mother suffers from they in my opinion are committing a fraud on the Court.      In the Federal Court notice pleading is the criterion and the fact that a guardian has been appointed for your mother ipso facto (the fact speaks for itself) avers that Florida Probate Court found your mother suffered from some rather serious disability.     Why else would the Court have appointed a guardian. [1]

The guardian whether legally or illegally appointed by a Court is a fiduciary and therefore, the guardian owes your mother (and you as a ‘associated’ person) the highest degree of fidelity and honesty.     If a guardian is ‘churning   the file’ whether a Court awards the excessive attorney fees and other fees is yet another violation of Americans with Disabilities.    Dishonesty (even if inadvertent or well intentioned) is not a reasonable accommodation!

Enforcement of ADA is a Federal obligation.     There is similar legislation at the State level, but, Congress has not delegated to the State the exclusive authority to determine what is a reasonable accommodation and what is not.     The reason for this is the fact that there is a long history of dishonest guardians, receivers, and other appointed judicial officials.      The disabled have been deemed a special class of citizens in need to protection so that they can enjoy the rights, privileges and immunities of all citizens.    (see answer to question 1).

As I read your documents what you are asking for from the Federal Court is that the guardians and certain other people (including some Judges) by ordered to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act .      America is a Nation of Laws and even if we do not like the particular law we have to obey it.      The problem that has developed is that a cottage industry of elder cleansing has developed and across the United States certain judges and their appointed guardians have chosen to ignore the Americans with Disabilities Act and the core values of America.

This e- mail may be used by you in any way that you deem to be appropriate.

Ken Ditkowsky.

[1] The games playing that you and other family members of ‘elder cleansing’ victims have had to endure is outrageous and contrary to the ‘core values’ of American civilization.     The Court and all attorneys are charged with being aware of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the requirements of reasonable accommodation.     If your mother was appropriately awarded a guardian under Florida law (as I read it) the Court must make specific findings as to what, if any, disability your mother had before appointing a guardian.    That guardian is limited in his authority to in a reasonable manner (at minimal expense) addressing only the disability found by the Court.     The guardian is not elected God, nor can a State Court abdicate its responsibilities to a professional guardian.     

For the record – if the averments that you make are 5% accurate the miscreants under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title 18 of the United States Code   have some very serious accountings to do.     Read 18 USCA 371.   

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Only the US government can come up with such a poster:

http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm

If you read the poster carefully, it says 1) the animal must be individually trained; 2) PTSD is a recognized disability; but 3) the purpose of the animal cannot be just to calm and/or simply providing emotional support is insufficient.

Many smaller dogs and cats already have been bred to sit and be petted–and that’s all they want to do all day long.  The only training they would need to be a therapy animal would be to ignore everything around them, which is often what these animals naturally do–especially when comfortable in a lap and being petted.

If PTSD or LAS (Legal Abuse Syndrome) can cause anxiety and emotional outbursts and a therapy animal simply being present or being petted quells the condition, then that should be part of the ADA.

Stress is extremely taxing and detrimental to the health of the human body.  People have died of anxiety attacks or they have provoked seriously and deadly diseases within a short period of time in a normally healthy human being.

When a body is stressed, temperature can wildly fluctuate, heart, lungs and all internal organs go into “fight or flight” mode–which is seriously abnormal and can lead to severe and/or permanent damage.  Adrenalin and other stress

I have therefore no idea why a therapy animal for PTSD or LAS or PTLD cannot just simply “be there”.  I assume the disabled person must, when stressed, then pet the dog or cat to stop the anxiety attack or emotional outburst.  Is being petted a job or task that the dog is trained to do?

Anyway, if it takes this much analysis to figure out what the ADA means, and the poster isn’t clear, that’s a huge issue in and of itself, since the statute is supposed to be remedial in nature and to be interpreted broadly.

We have seen what happens when the ARDC interprets the statute narrowly.

JoAnne

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Sep 5, 2014 6:47 AM
To: Candice Schwager , Theresa M , Barbara Stone , JoAnne M Denison , Sherry Johnston
Cc: Nasga Us , Eric Holder , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Probate Sharks , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Tim NASGA , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , BILL DITKOWSKY , Cook County States Attorney , Ginny Johnson , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , Barbara Stone , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , Bev Cooper , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “Chicagotonight (” , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “hannity@foxnews.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Rudy Bush , The Wall Street Journal , Mary Richards
Subject: Re: Using_Law_and_Regulation_to_Protect_Nursing_Home_Residents_Updated_sept82006.doc

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Sep 1, 2014 7:11 PM
To: Candice Schwager , Tim Larhman , Barbara Stone , JoAnne M Denison
Subject: Re: “GOOD NIGHT, SLEEP TIGHT” | TERRY W. HAMMOND & ASSOCIATES

Please call me if you have anything. She was rendered homeless and penniless in cases either without summons and complaint and no jurisdiction, or she received orders without notice or hearing.

She needs a clean place to stay, preferably with loving and very patient support.  She is clean, honest and a staunch conservative Roman Catholic.

Anything you might find or hear of would be most grateful.  Experience dealing with Legal Abuse Syndrome will be helpful (see book on this blog or youtube.com and search “legal abuse syndrome” for more information.

Please call me on my cell or text me.  773 255 7608 joanne

take care and thanks

From: bstone12@hotmail.com
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com; schwagerlawfirm@live.com; joanne@justice4every1.com; verenusl@gmail.com; nasga.org@gmail.com; vahrh1135@aol.com; jdit@aol.com; askdoj@usdoj.gov; matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov; janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com; tips@tribune.com; chicago@ic.fbi.gov; letters@suntimes.com; civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov; drditkowsky@aol.com; ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com; statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov; scottcevans@hotmail.com; foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com; aclu@aclu.org; ada.complaintadmin@usdoj.gov; bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com; ecarter@atg.state.il.us; sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov; sa3456@msn.com; chicagotonight@wttw.com; isba@list.isba.org; tips@cbschicago.com; loamu@aol.com; jimdit@earthlink.net; kozakm1@gmail.com; fiduciarywatch@gmail.com; 60m@cbsnews.com; support@wsj.com; utterby@sbcglobal.net; jana.neethi.7@facebook.com; activistpost@gmail.com; fox2newsdesk@foxtv.com; ssugarmd@msn.com; zamirkatan@aol.com; consult4lj@yahoo.com; illinoislawyernow@isba.org; wmrcls@hotmail.com; acluofillinois@aclu-il.org; llessura@gmail.com; information@iardc.org; truthbetoldradio@gmail.com; glenest03@yahoo.com; nvallone1@gmail.com; prov2828@hotmail.com; yjdmd@msn.com; johnhowardwyman@gmail.com; jdenison@surfree.com; hannity@foxnews.com; drrob2007@yahoo.com; chachaangelina@yahoo.com; tozzolyles@gmail.com; today@nbc.com; michael.miller@miaminewtimes.com; evening@cbsnews.com
Subject: My beautiful mom whose death was ordered by a black robed predator
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:16:16 -0400

Dear Mr. Holder and Mr. Commey

Please protect my beautiful defenseless elder mom, Helen Stone from life threatening danger.  She has been abused by being punched and shaken until she is black and blue.  She is being drugged by drugs so powerful that a 300 pound man would be knocked out.   Her speech is very slurred – she cannot speak because of the chemical restraints that are forced on her.  She was given fake glasses and cannot see.  She is isolated and is forcibly kept in a lock down facility in Miami, Florida. 

 My mom weighs less than 90 pounds because she was deprived her food money.  She was emergency admitted to the hospital after my spiritual leader visited her and found her unconscious and incoherent.   My vibrant mom who was always impeccably dressed now looks like a refugee from a third world country because she was emaciated.  She suffered surgery to implant a feeding tube although she is perfectly capable of eating because the criminal enterprise that owns her does not want to spend the time to give her food. 

My mom’s property and her treasured possessions have been looted.  She has been forcibly removed from her apartment that I found for her that she and my father proudly fixed up and made it their home.  My dad always wanted to be on the ground floor of an apartment building so I spent months finding them the perfect place that would suit their needs.

My mom always called me her heart.  We were inseparable – wherever we went, we were always told we looked alike. 

Now my mom can’t see me because someone who wears a black robe, operates under color of law abuse and issues death edicts wants her to die in isolation so the cabal that operates a criminal enterprise called “guardianship”  can steal her assets and possessions.  

Taking my mother’s possessions by theft ordered by a black robe predator is a sordid, discriminatory and criminal felony under Florida laws statute 825 and Federal laws 18 USC 4, 42 USC 1983 and 1985.  It is a heinous affront to a law abiding citizen.  Yet the plundering and beatings and atrocities committed on a vulnerable defenseless widow that has now been made public is tyrannical.  

 I wonder why the word ‘guardian” seems to have some different connotation when it is referenced by that term instead of the definitions that accurately describe the activities being perpetrated by the guardian enterprise- human trafficking, money laundering. crimes against humanity, color of law abuse, criminal enterprise, RICO crimes, identity theft, social security theft and discrimination.   

These are Federal and State crimes that fall under the purview of the Department of Justice and the FBI.    

I am the target of malicious retaliation for trying to protect my mom that is so vicious that I have no frame of reference to even comprehend.  I have been slandered and vilified with perjured with repeated stay away orders.   I have been denied the right to see my mother.  My mother does not even know why she cannot see me. 

The mastermind of this operation is an attorney who was found guilty of fraud, perjury and lying under oath by the 3^rd DCA.   He uses my mother’s assets as his slush fund.   He has taken the law into his own hands with the collusion of a criminal wearing a black robe. 

This attorney, a criminal is thumbing his nose at you and taunting the law enforcement profession.  I have notified the police.  In utter astonishment and disregard for their duty to investigate, instead of doing so, they contact the very people who are abusing her who shut them down.  I have contacted Governor Rick Scott who is well aware that Florida’s citizens are being deprived of their life  by this criminal enterprise who informs me that although “he cares for our citizens”, there is “nothing” he can do.  

These are crimes of abuse, exploitation and discrimination. 

Please deputize me to enforce the law if law enforcement will  not enforce their laws..

How is it that our American justice system has come to this – where I must plead for my mother’s life? 

How can you tolerate this shameless unlawful abuse of an innocent law abiding defenseless citizen? 

Mr. Holder and Mr. Commey- my parents were the foundation of America.  They meet in college after my dad did a tour with the army and served in Vietnam.  He received an honorable discharge and married my mom. the town beauty of a small town in the deep south – Canton Mississippi.  They moved there after college and opened a retail store.  The Kl Klux Klan reigned at that time.  My grandfather would go to the jail in the middle of the night to bail out persons who were discriminated against.  My parents would give clothes from their store on trust alone to the townspeople to take home and try on without being bullied by other customers.  My dad was a steadfast believer in human rights.

 This is a photo of my mom and I when I arranged a surprise birthday party for her before our encounter with this underworld operation.   The other attached photo is my mom’s emaciated body after the cabal took human possession of her and her money and deprived her of food.

This enterprise is a massive financial fraud scheme that dwarfs the Bernie Madoff and Enron scandal.   It is way overly ripe for your investigation.  It is rampant and as our population ages, it will explode and infiltrate crime into every pore of our country.

Massive emergency measures are needed.

Mr. Holder and Mr. Commey, my mother is in imminent danger.  She is being kept isolated, denied her right to eat, she is being chemically restrained, denied her right to see me, her daughter and is kept in a lock down facility in Miami,  Florida.  Her body is frail and she is in life threatening danger.  

Please take my mother to safety and save her life.

Please, please have someone from your organization contact me and proudly carry out your law abiding protection of my mother.   

Sincerely,

Barbara Stone

212.994.5482

212.994.5481 – fax’

bstone12@hotmail.com

bstone575@gmail.com

Below is a very sad story sent to me today from another state where a woman was isolated from her children after the children posted in detail how the nursing home was abusing the mother and other residents.

The nursing home used the GAL then to isolate the children from their mother and lock her down.

http://silveradosucks.com/silverado-senior-living-threats-censorship-tied-to-medicare-violations/

Unfortunately, these stories are rampant. Nursing homes get worse and worse with little meaningful inspections. Resdients (and the US govt) pay $4,000 to $7,000 per month (depending on the size of the estate), to put the resident in a nursing home bed, provide 1/10 of a $8 per hour employee per day (at home you would spend $150 per day for 100% hands on care and it would be less), feed the seniors cheap processed food from a food service (read, balogna sandwiches, processed eggs or mostly cereal for breakfast, etc. or about $2 per day for meals) and reap huge profits in a variety of ways already published here.

Nursing homes are inspected about once every 5 years across the US, if that.  A report of abuse (beating, starvation, hydration) will NOT bring an inspector out necessarily.  As in the Sykes case, the agencies are peppered with “inspectors” that ignore and do no meaningful inspections and just about always find in favor of the nursing home (ask John Wyman, his mother was beat with bruises, near death, and he had to submit the paperwork 3 times to get a finiding of “abuse indicated”–months later).

Now the nursing homes check social media, Yelp, etc. and demand the information come down.

Then they further abuse and isolate the senior–with permission of the court and the investigative agencies.

Dissidence in the US is no longer protected in the US where lucrative nursing home contracts are involved–it is crushed, the seniors further abused, and with a vengeance.

Of course, Ken and I have reported to askdoj@doj.gov and you all should do the same.

joanne

From Ken Ditkowsky:

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 31, 2014 10:39 PM
To: Candice Schwager , Barbara Stone , JoAnne M Denison , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Tim NASGA , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , SUNTIMES , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , Fiduciary Watch , “hannity@foxnews.com” , Janet Phelan , Human Rights Watch
Subject: Re: Texas Complaint: Eligible for Steward v Perry?

See  http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/SupremeCourt/1998/October/Opinions/HTML/84117.htm

where the Ill. Supreme court confirmed that lawyer’s fees are excluded under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, but for those of you out there that are livid over your trust’s or estate’s legal fees, read the case:

This court’s regulatory scheme extends to the area of attorneys’ fees. Rule 1.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct specifically addresses the subject, providing, in pertinent part:

“(a) A lawyer’s fee shall be reasonable. The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following:

(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;

(2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;

(3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;

(4) the amount involved and the results obtained;

(5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances;

(6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;

(7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and

(8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.” 134 Ill. 2d R. 1.5(a).

Rule 1.5 also addresses the attorney’s obligation to communicate to the client the basis or rate of the fee. 134 Ill. 2d R. 1.5(b). 

1.5 sets forth guidelines for contingent fee arrangements and the division of fees among attorneys. 134 Ill. 2d Rs. 1.5(c) through (j).

I think there is an argument that while the Illinois legislature said legal fees are not to be included under the CFA (which provides for legal fees in the enforcement thereof), the Illinois Sup. Ct. could have said, THEY are adopting the CFA as it applies to lawyers.

They had a chance to do some good, but did not.

JoAnne

This information was was Pat Smith, a new volunteer at Justice4 Every1, NFP.  We are always looking for volunteers to do investigations, case research and file research. Thanks

From a blog fan who pointed out an interesting legal concept that is alive and in force in Illinois

The Summary from the Reporter of Decisions:

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 28, 2014 4:59 PM
To: Tim NASGA
Cc: Eric Holder , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Matt Senator Kirk
Subject: ADA

From: JoAnne M Denison[SMTP:JDENISON@SURFREE.COM]
Sent: August 28, 2014 3:56:18 PM
To: donlhorn@MiamiSAO.com; Barbara Stone; Alyece Russell;
Michael Nofsinger; Kenneth Ditkowsky [Ditkowsky Law]; Sylvia Rudek NASGA;
Ask the Dept of Justice.com
Subject: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother
Auto forwarded by a Rule

JoAnne Denison, Executive Director
Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 28, 2014 4:24 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , “donlhorn@miamisao.com” , BILL DITKOWSKY , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com”
Subject: Re: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 27, 2014 12:40 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , SUNTIMES , Tim NASGA , “FBI- ( (” , Cook County States Attorney , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Cook Sheriff , Bev Cooper , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , “Chicagotonight (” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Fiduciary Watch , “Jim (” , Martin Kozak , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Human Rights Watch , The Wall Street Journal , “info@bettergov.org” , “information@iardc.org” , “information@elderaffairs.org”
Cc: Tim Lahrman , The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right <3d@mail.americanbar.org>, “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Martha Jantho
Subject: Fw: Fw: WestlawNext – Busse v. Motorola, Inc.

From: Barbara Stone
Sent: Aug 26, 2014 12:15 AM
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky , “joanne@justice4every1.com” , Janet Phelan , Eric Holder , Human Rights Watch , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Probate Sharks , “J. Ditkowsky” , Harry Heckert , Matt Senator Kirk , ISBA Main Discussion Group ,  etc.
Subject: Guardianship fraud

Certain of the members of the Florida Bar use their organization as a front for their orchestrating and acting as an accomplice to cause atrocities, embezzlement and death of certain classes of citizens, the elderly, disabled and the vulnerable in a scheme operating under the guise of guardianship. 

My 86 year old mother, Helen Stone is being abused, extorted and her death is being orchestrated by a criminal enterprise that operates under a guise of “guardianship”. 

Federal and State Laws prohibit abuse, aggravated abuse, exploitation, embezzlement and discrimination.  They prohibit murder and premeditated murder.

This lawless operation has taken human ownership of my mother. She is a chattel in their possession with less rights than a criminal. 

1. This criminal enterprise takes the assets of their victim pre-death.  This is the most byzantine of concepts.  The predator attorney for a family member of course knows that once a person is placed in a guardianship, their assets will NEVER be returned to them.  Like the Third Reich confiscated the assets of their victims in Nazi Germany, so is the activity of the attorneys who engage in extorting ill gotten gains .

1. Dr. Swier describes this treasonous conduct in his expose of the atrocities that were committed against Marie Winkleman

http://drrichswier.com/2014/02/14/free-marie-winkelman-pray-for-justice-now/

3. Once the assets of their victim get transferred to the criminal enterprise their agenda becomes shifts to the manner in which to cause the death of their prey while making it appear they are being attended and while gauging how to most effectively cause their death .  It is a known fact the elderly die and deteriorate without stimulation and their loved ones in their life.    The masterminds of this murderous industry employ stay away orders as the tool to effectuate the isolation.  All family members except those who are participating in the premeditated death plot are vanished by the stroke of a pen from their loved one.  All over the state,  children are prohibited from seeing their parents.  Verboten –  Third Reich activities. How is it possible that children and family members are harmful to their loved ones and their loved ones are being “protected” by these mobsters? It is not possible.  It is crime so heinous that EMERGENCY MEASURES ARE NEEDED.

4. Once isolated the victim is alone and the crimes become insidious. Committed in secrecy with no eyes.   Their house becomes a house of horrors.  My mother had no food.  My mother was left in her bed with soiled clothes and drugged mercilessly.    She was rushed by emergency to the hospital after I sent my spiritual leader to see her and he reported she was incoherent.  She was diagnosed in the hospital with dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia, fractures, and other life threatening conditions.  She was emaciated.  She was forcibly implanted a feeding tube although she was perfectly capable of eating. She has now been forcibly taken to a lock down facility where she is chemically restrained. She was given fake dime store glasses so has constant headaches as she cannot see.  Her torment is masterminded by a monster / mobster with a law license. 

5. Web sites are prolific describing the new Third Reich.

6. The new atrocity is the “feeding tube” guise.  This has been exposed as a deprivation of life tactic.  Feeding tubes are forced on people perfectly capable of eating   because it is convenient for and serves the interest of their “caretaker” who has no need to tend to them or feed them.  These people are DEPRIVED OF THEIR RIGHT TO EAT AND FORCED TO UNERGO SURGERY TO IMPLANT A FEEDING TUBE.   This atrocity was forced on my mother.   Mrs. Schindler, Terri Schiavo’s mother has discussed this with me and others in great depth. 

Guardianship is a crime against humanity.  We are watching our loved ones being deprived of their life under our eyes.  They are helplessly watching their own death occur.  Can you imagine?   

 THE BAR SHOULD ACCEPT NO LESS THAN  ZERO  TOLERANCE – these lawyers denigrate all lawyers.

BRING MY MOTHER HOME TO ME.  NOW.  IMMEDIATELY.  MY MOTHER IS 86 YEARS OLD.  SHE IS BEING ABUSED.  SHE IS BEING EXPLOITED.  SHE IS BEING SUBJECTED TO  ATROCITIES.  SHE HAS SUFFERED ABUSES FOR A THOUSAND LIFETIMES.  SHE DESERVES TO AND MUST LIVE HER REMAINING DAYS IN COMFORT AND WITH HER DAUGHER. 

This is a call for the immediate disbarment of the lawyer engaged in this crime, his arrest and indictment and the arrest and indictment of the criminal enterprise.

Barbara Stone

bstone12@hotmail.com

Dearest Barbara;

My heat goes out to you.  The feeding tube ruse, I agree is a game of death.  Ask Bev and Ken Cooper about her beloved mother who was capable of eating, loved to eat.  So what did they do?  The family protested a feeding tube, so her 29 gold teeth were pulled and she was starved to death!  Cold, calculated and merciless. 

Our country made fun of Russia for it’s orphan children of the poor mothers who were housed cheek to jowl in rotten orphanages, hands tied above their heads or behind their backs so food could be shoved in without hands in the way.  As a result, Russian orphans preferred to eat with hands above their heads or behind their backs.  Americans called that cruel, all the while forcing feeding tubes down seniors that enjoyed leisurely dining with one problem– a caretaker had to help for 15 to 30 minutes.  Greedy nursing home operators won’t pay for that. It’s $5,000 per month for balogny sandwiches tossed at the senior and 5 cent cups of coffee– or nothing.  I hear from seniors in “retirement homes” which are paid for by medicare.  It’s cereal for breakfast, a cheap sandwich for lunch and dinner.  Maybe a couple of slices of cold canned deboned turkey for 2 or 3 holidays per year.  That’s where the state puts them.  Our OPG does it and drains estates of $300k, $500k and up, leaving seniors in these places.  The OPG and probate attorneys take the money for fees and their tied in friends, and eventually the senior is left homeless and penniless.  They take all the money while the senior’s social security pays for dumps to live in with sandwiches for meals.

Again, my heart goes out to you and your mother.  You will both be in my hearts and prayers with 1000 angels to pray and light candles for you both too.

This has to end.   Barbara, they can put you under house arrest, but they cannot silence your truth.  Keep on speaking out.  Don’t stop.

JoAnne

Read the below article on how a woman with tapeworms that became physically and mentally disabled fell under the Florida guardianship program and lost $250 in fees!

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2014-05-08/news/florida-guardian-elderly-fraud/

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 25, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Barbara Stone , Sam Sugar , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , “FBI- (”
Subject: Some thoughts on the Barbara Stone matter – and complaint pursuant to 18 USCA 4 to Law Enforcement.

Ms. Stone – the atrocities committed against your mother are barbaric and wrong and to be blunt, the acts of a terrorist. ISIS has more respect for the law than appears to be the situation that you face!

I have previously suggested that as attorneys and judges are involved the corrupt actions must be as a matter of law reported to not only the Florida Bar, but law enforcement pursuant to 18 USCA 4.  

As I pointed out to you and Dr. Sugar yesterday the Florida Statute is very specific in protecting the rights of senior citizens and the disabled.    Thus, every member of the Florida Bar is charged with the knowledge that the usurping of the Civil and Human Rights of your mother was not only wrongful but a Felony.    The act of lawyers in preying on an elder vulnerable person by orchestrating the deprivation of food, medical attention and services designed to cause her death and stockpile her assets so this attorney can get sequester them is garden variety theft.    The Charade of Judicial Proceedings in these elder cleansing case is so reprehensible that it warrants the most severe reprimand including disbarment and jail time.   

The fabricating litigation (including quasi criminal proceedings) against you as her (your mother’s) heir is part of an ongoing scheme that discredits not only the legal profession but the State of Florida.   The action labels the Florida justice system in the most derogatory terms and converts the proceedings to the worst category of national socialist gulag [1] .   The Court in prosecuting you in a criminal vein for protesting the exercise of your Civil Rights is an independent violation of the law that cannot be condoned by the United States of America, the State of Florida, or any legitimate Court.    I am therefore urging the FLORIDA BAR and Mr. Coleman to instanter intervene in the travesty of proceedings that you are involved and abrogate the Taliban experience that you are having in Florida.

A Judge ruling that you have no standing to protest the total vitiation of the Florida remedial Statute designed to protect people such as your mother is a clear violation of 42 USCA 1983 and an assault on the First Amendment that cannot be tolerated.   To then press “criminal charges against you” (non-contempt) is an absurdity.   Prefatory rulings in criminal proceedings are ipso facto unconstitutional and a demonstration of bias, and just as serious is for you to not have an appointed attorney and be informed of your RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL.   An honest intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of your case not only required it is mandated by the fundamental credos of America.

  If Judges and lawyers ignore the ‘core values’ of America and the Rule of Law as set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States were have anarchy and chaos.             

[1] I am aware that Gulags were soviet inventions –

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 23, 2014 6:17 PM
To: Barbara Stone , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Ginny Johnson , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , Glenda Martinez , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Illinois ARDC , BILL DITKOWSKY , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (”
Subject: verification of claims

Dear Readers;

The purpose of this blog is to promote truth and justice.  We must work together. There are too many dark and evil entities out there in the form of lawyers, court appointed workers and companies, judges and others who are victimizing and terrorizing wards and their families.  Justice and truth must prevail.

From Dr. Cordero– another advocate for justice:

Dear Ms. Denison,

Thank you for your email and for your words of appreciation.

You may post the previous email as well as its follow-up, which is below.

Can you, your coreaders, and we work together as proposed in those two emails?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

*****************************************************************

First join forces to inform & outrage public re wrongdoing judges, remove them, then new legislation

Dear Mr. Roland and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,

Thank you for all your emails concerning my 3-step plan of action for exposing wrongdoing judges and bringing about judicial reform. I appreciate your kind words about it.

In particular, I am encouraged by the possibility that we may be able to work together. As I have repeatedly stated, we, advocates of honest judiciaries, need to join forces or we will continue to achieve only what we have achieved so far: nothing( ol:127¶4 ).

*NOTE: All ( parenthetical ) and [ ^bracketed ] blue text is references to supporting sections § or paragraphs¶, and foot- and endnote superscripts, respectively, found in the study downloadable through either of these links:

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/14-8-18DrRCordero-MrCWilson_DignityAlliance.pdf

or

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqw00v30ex3kbho/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

or

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx26luEuzfjgZTUwUkJIc3FNYnM/edit?usp=sharing >ol:127

or

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

or

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf >ol:127

In the downloaded file, the blue text represents active cross-referential links that facilitate jumping to the corresponding references to check them..

If you cannot download the file through any of those links, please let me know by emailing me at Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail.com .

1. Timing: the public must be informed of the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing before politicians adopt window dressing provisions

1. Your points, Mr. Roland, are well taken and presuppose for their implementation that we join forces. The pertinence of your 5 ^th point should be highlighted because it deals with the critical issue of timing. You wrote:

5. If you can, try to present the more appealing and easily understood reforms to the voters before the referendum, because it might persuade some to cast a yes vote.”

1. Wrongdoing judges now on the bench will still be there to misapply in self-interest any new statutory and constitutional provisions

2. Even constitutional amendments, let alone a statute, will leave in place wrongdoing judges to apply them. They will apply the new provisions in the same manner as they have current ones up to now: to protect themselves and each other to the detriment of parties and the rest of the public:

3. Federal chief circuit judges systematically dismiss 99.82% of misconduct complaints against their peers( jur:10-14 ) and together with other judges in circuit councils ⁹⁶ ( jur:20 ) deny up to 100% of petitions to review those dismissals( jur:24§§b-d ). In effect, they have arrogated to themselves the power to nullify in self-interest through their dishonest application the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 (28 U.S. Code §§ 351-364 ^18a ), enacted by the other two branches to enable any person to file a complaint against a federal judge (hereafter the Act).

4. Likewise, they routinely disregard 28 U.S.C. §455 ⁴⁰ , which imposes on them the duty to dis-qualify themselves on their own motion where “[their] impartiality might reasonably be ques-tioned” or where they have a bias ²⁷¹ or conflict of interests affecting them or their relatives, never mind their denial out of hand of motions by parties for their disqualification on such grounds ²⁷² .

5. Today’s wrongdoing judges will not be forced to respect the provisions against their own inter-ests contained in a new ink-besmirched piece of paper issued in future from Congress or a consti-tutional convention any more than they have been forced by current similarly besmirched paper. Their self-serving performance of their office will ensure that no complaint or motion ever crosses whatever new threshold is set for judges to take disciplinary action against themselves.

2. Politicians who do not investigate for wrongdoing ‘their men and women on the bench’ will not adopt effective provisions against them

6. Politicians have no interest in adopting, much less enforcing, provisions against judges, whom they recommended, nominated, and confirmed to judgeships( 77§§5-6 ). In fact, they disregard their own checks and balances on judges( 50¶¶95-97 ) in the form of the Annual Report that they require the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts ^{10 http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/28usc601-613_Adm_Off.pdf} to submit to Congress ^23a http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/28usc601-613_Adm_Off.pdf with the statistics ^19a on judges’ handling of complaints against them.

7. Through their covering-up and encouraging disregard, politicians act as accessories after the judges’ Act-nullifying conduct in the year covered by a Report and accessories before such conduct in the following year.

8. By so holding ‘their own men and women on the bench’ unaccountable, politicians expect them to declare the statutes that form a party’s legislative agenda constitutional or unconstitutional ^17a , as the case may be. Just examine how the majority of 5-4 votes in the Supreme Court are in har-mony with the party affiliation of the presidents who nominated the several justices.

9. Likewise, politicians expect that by not investigating judges, the latter will have no reason to retaliate against them if they appear before their bench charged with their own wrongdoing ¹⁵ .

3. Only an informed and outraged public can force wrongdoing judges out of the bench and hold the remaining and new judges accountable

1. Before any referendum is held, and even before any discussion begins about amending the Constitution –rendered opportune after Michigan became last June the 34 ^th state to call for a constitu-tional convention ( jur:139fn ^{270 >Ln:309} ) -, the public must be informed about the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing( ol:127¶4 ) and its harm to the public’s property, liberty, and lives( jur:5§3 ).

1. Indeed, the national public will be outraged upon learning that the unaccountability of federal judges, who constitute the only national jurisdiction, induces them to engage risklessly in wrongdoing. The latter includes the judges’ arbitrary and harmful disregard for the constraints of due process as well as for the law applicable to, and the facts of, the cases that parties bring before them, which judges fob off with dishonest adjudicative services( ol:128 § c ).

2. Judges also do wrong by participating in criminal activity, such as concealment of assets to evade taxes and launder money( 65§§1-3 ), whereby they serve themselves indulgence in boundless conduct. By what they wrongfully deny others and allow themselves to do they usurp the status of Judges Above the Law.

3. The information about wrongdoing judges’ abusive and unequal treatment will outrage the pub-lic. It will also make understandable the far-reaching changes in statutory( 158§7 ) and consti-tutional provisions necessary to ensure that judges comply with the rule of law and administer to others and themselves Equal Justice Under Law, e.g.,

1. the establishment of independent citizen boards of judicial accountability and discipline( 160§8 )

1. establishment of an inspector general for the judiciary ( 158§6 );

1. the elimination of tenured judgeships;

1. the holding of all judicial meetings on an open door basis( ol:127 ¶ 4a ); etc.

4. A public outraged through information and assertively demanding those changes is indispensable. Without it, neither conniving politicians nor wrongdoing judges can be reasonably expected to make changes entailing their loss of power or privileged status.

5. Nor will wrongdoing judges apply any change honestly to give it effect in practice, for their interest lies in a cover-up and the frustration of all accountability measures. This calls for their removal from the bench. It can be effected under the current constitutional provision of Art. III, Sec. 1 ^12b , which allows the holding of a judgeship only “ during good Behaviour ” ^12a .

6. Only an outraged public can generate the opinion pressure needed to cause the resignation or impeachment of wrongdoing judges, the way it caused S.Ct. Justice Abe Fortas to resign in 1969 ( 92§d )…or to terminate the careers of politicians indifferent to its demands, the way voters in the Virginia primaries terminated the career of HR Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

7. Only politicians frightened at the prospect of having their political careers similarly terminated can find it in their highest interest, survival, to push through far-reaching statutory provisions and constitutional amendments for judicial reform and ensure that they are effectively applied.

8. Information about wrongdoing judges can enlighten the public about its status as the source of political power in ‘government of, by, and for the people’ ¹⁷² and about the need and its means( ol: 129¶9 ) to assert such status. It can so outrage the public as to stir it up to change the We the People -government balance of power:

9. The People are the employer of public officers, including judicial ones, and can change the terms of employment, which they can enforce through citizen boards rather than those officers to require transparency of performance, accountability, disci-pline, and liability to compensate their wrongdoing’s victims.

1. An informed and outraged public can develop into an assertive, Tea Party-like civic movement: the People ’s Sunrise( jur:164§9 ).

1. The time is now, before the elections and a constitutional convention, for us to join forces to inform and outrage the people

1. I have proposed a 3-step plan of action( ol:127 ) for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform: read the study of it( title ), continue it, and propose action. The proposed action is reasonable and feasible in terms of effort and money: to inform through presentations( Lsch:9 ) of:

1. the evidence already available of judges’ wrongdoing( jur:§§A-B );

1. investigative activities( ol:115 ), e.g., the pursuit of two stories( ol:100 ) that can outrage the public at the nature, extent , and gravity of judges’ wrongdoing in connivance with politicians :

1). the President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story and the Follow the money! investigation; and

2) the Federal Judiciary-NSA story and the Follow it wirelessly! investigation; and

1. the material and moral rewards( ol:3§F ) that can be earned by pursuing those activities and stories, such as winning a Pulitzer Prize, being played in a blockbuster movie, and receiving the recognition of a grateful nation as We the People ’s Champions of Justice.

2. The presentations are to be made to professionals( 128 § 4 ) and graduate students( 129§b ), such as:

1. journalists and media outlets ( ol:22 , 26 , 88 ) invited to private meetings or press conferences;

1. graduate schools of:

1) journalism(ol:54; Lsch:23)

2) law(Lsch:1, 21) and

3) business(jur:104¶¶236-237)

4) Information Technology(ol:42, 60);

1. public interest entities( jur:86§4 );

1. political meetings( ol:51 , 58 ); etc.

3. Swapping emails among us will get us nowhere.

4. Sending just one person to Congress, such as HR Candidate Andy Ostrowski, for him to persuade as many among the other 434 HR members as necessary, who are limited to a 2-year mandate and from day 1 are working on their ree-lection, to work against their own interest by taking on life-tenured unaccountable federal judges, is a mission impossible. If we do not provide Mr. Ostrowski with the support of like-minded candidates and eventually elected ones not only in the House, but also in the Senate, as well as the much more important support of an informed, outraged, and assertive national public, we too will fail in our effort at exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform.

5. Thus, are we willing to join forces and, if so, work actively, not just provide each other moral support, to implement that plan of action?

6. Timing is of the essence: The public should be informed and outraged before the mid-term election; the invaluable help of graduate students and others should be sought at the beginning of the academic year.

7. How can you contribute to arranging the proposed presentations?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare trigger history! ( jur:7§5 )…and you may enter it.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.

Judicial Discipline Reform

New York City

Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail.com

See also:

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/14-8-18DrRCordero-MrCWilson_DignityAlliance.pdf >ol:127

or

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqw00v30ex3kbho/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

or

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx26luEuzfjgZTUwUkJIc3FNYnM/edit?usp=sharing >ol:127

or

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >ol:127

or

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/jur/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf >ol: 1 27

If you cannot download the file through any of those links, please let Dr. Cordero know by emailing him at Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail.com .

www.linkedin.com/pub/dr-richard-cordero-esq/4b/8ba/50/

*******************************************

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwM0JwOTFEMm1qMVBzZnVvZHNWbHNPNVg1QjFr/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwNlhPWGhZUUJIZG4zS3lRcUo1QVNLMFNXcjY4/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwNlp2NmxPbFQ2a0xLNzNfeFNMWlctalVwRXNF/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwR3JvOE1TdW5EMzlCUE14ZG5la0dnRTNzTnVJ/edit?usp=sharing

You may want to check these out.  She does have a test for PTLD or Legal abuse syndrom.  I just recommend that anyone who has felt terrorized or fearful in court buy and read her book.  A bit of advice from this amazing woman can help many, many people avoid PTLD and LAS.

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 22, 2014 11:38 AM
To: “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “Complaint ADA (CRT)” , Eric Holder , “FBI- (” , Chicago FBI , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , Cook County States Attorney , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “J. Ditkowsky” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago Tribune , Janet Phelan , SUNTIMES , Ginny Johnson , BILL DITKOWSKY , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Bev Cooper , “Chicagotonight (” , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Martin Kozak , “Jim (” , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Martha Jantho , “Fox2newsdesk (” , The Wall Street Journal , Eric Blair , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” , Barbara Stone , ACLU of Illinois , Rudy Bush , Sam Sugar , Alyece Russell , “Truthbetoldradio (” , “information@iardc.org” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Tom Fields , Nancy Vallone , RosANNa Miller , Glenda Martinez , Yjd , John Howard Wyman , Robert Bissonnette , Len Holland , Marty Prehn , Maria 60 Minutes , Theresa Pizzarello , “foxbusiness_7d7b711af105dca6eb5d0f24e6c8de86@newsletters.foxnews.com”
Cc: “ABAJournal.com” , WSJ Reporter , “weekend@cbsnews.com” , The Weekly Standard

Subject: COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES CONCERNING FELONIES COMMITTED (18 usca 4) & COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO ADA ON BEHALF OF PERSONS WHO ARE BEING DENIED THEIR CIVIL, HUMAN, AND PROPERTY RIGHTS BY THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIANS – THE SAID GUARDIANS EXCEEDING THEIR AUTHORITY.

 
This morning August 22, 2014 the Chicago Tribune reports that a criminal lawyer is being prosecuted for his subordination of perjury.    There is no report that Mr. Jerome Larkin or any of his staff members are being prosecuted for their role in the alleged subordination of perjury that occurred during the kangaroo hearings involving Attorney JoAnne Denison, or the perjury that was committed during Mr. Larkin’s assault on the First Amendment in the Amu case or in my case.
The facts are very simple.    Judge Stuart was asked questions concerning the ‘chaining’ of Ms. Gloria Sykes in Judge Stuart’s courtroom.    As there were court watchers present Mr. Larkin faces some serious legal problems because Judge Stuart is reported to have first denied that Ms. Sykes was handcuffed as part of the intimidation process, and then blurted out that this was the first only time such an event occurred.     As these proceedings are tightly controlled and there is evidence of ex-parte communications between the trier of fact and Mr. Larkin’s people the subordination of perjury problem is very acute.    The problem is aggravated by the fact that the panels in spite of having to address a standard of “clear and convincing evidence” in fact require no evidence and on facts to convict.    For instance, Mr. Larkin and the miscreant guardians and judicial officials have yet to disclose a single fact that Mr. Amu, Ms. Denison or I stated that was false much less provide any proof that such fact was in fact false.  
When the transcript of Judge Stuart’s testimony was written up the transcript was reported to be altered so as to rectify and sanitize the aforesaid testimony.      As the Court reporter makes an audio recording to the testimony, Ms. Denison requested the same.      Hysterically Larkin and his attorneys have refused to provide the audio.         Mr. Larkin has a delegation for the Supreme Court of Illinois to protect the public from unethical lawyers.      How then does Mr. Larkin first present a witness who appears to be ‘frugal with the truth’ and then a transcript the uses an improper literary license in its presentation so as to alter the evidence presented so that the evidence is not in accord with objective reality?
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I am forwarding this note to the Department of Justice to report yet another felony that is occurring in the office of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.   I am also pursuant to Himmel reporting Mr. Larkin’s unacceptable and ethically challenged behavior to the Commission.   No I do not expect that they will do an HONEST intelligent complete or comprehensive investigation – from past history, I expect we will get another letter telling us to ‘pound sand!’     However, the problems reported are very serious and are a cancer that has infected the fabric of America.    Therefore, they need to be addressed.
To reiterate:
1)      First Amendment.      Even a pre-teen knows that all citizens have the duty pursuant to 18 USCA 4 to report felonies to law enforcement.     The right to petition the government is clearly stated not only in the First Amendment but in Article 1 section 4 of the Illinois Constitution and reiterated again at 735 ILCS 110/5.      Mr. Larkin is uninterested and therefore he has prosecuted lawyers for complaining about corruption in the Courts.    Ms. Denison, Mr. Amu and I have been victims of Larkin’s ultra vires and unconstitutional behavior.
2)      Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment.      Equal protection of the law is a ‘core value’ of America; however, Mr. Larkin does not recognize the same.     The proceedings before his panels are notorious for being kangaroo courts replete with ex-parte communications, perjury, bias and other deficiencies.    The proceedings against Mr. Amu smack of racism!      I am surprised that the panel did not chuck its suit for White Sheets and hoods!
3)      Discrimination against the elderly, the disabled, and the infirm.      There are several ways that one can look at Mr.  Larkin’s actions.    The problem is in every way that the actions are described the actions are reprehensible and wrong.     In both my proceeding and that of Ms. Denison the treatment of Ms. Gloria Sykes is and was totally improper and ethically challenged.    One of the most glaring acts occurred on or about July 1.     As the evidence of the criminal activity of the two guardian ad litem and the guardian mounted so that even the Judges were indicating embarrassment concerning the miscreant behavior a senior attorney (Ms. Guzman) refused a complaint against the miscreants on the basis that Adam Stern had been appointed guardian ad litem for Gloria Sykes.     Of course Ms. Guzman was operating under the standard credo of the IARDC as administered by Larkin – i.e. do not confuse me with the facts, I’ve made up my mind.     When Ms. Sykes voiced her outrage at the knowingly false statement Ms. Guzman 17 days later claimed that her prevarication was a ‘typo!’    
 
Larkin and the IARDC are aware of Congress has decreed in the Americans with Disabilities Act that disabled people are be afforded reasonable accommodation for their disability.    755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 (b) recites the goal of the State of Illinois and thus limits any adventure by judicial officials and guardians in excess of the ADA.     In a State in which school children have difficulty naming the governors who have not gone to jail and in which it has been calculated that $3008 dollars a year per capita is the cost of corruption it is not surprising that some judges and some lawyers would create a cottage industry –for profit – that preys on the elderly.   
 
Ms. Denison and I pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and our moral conscience started documenting and complaining to law enforcement concerning the infamies  of some of the more famous guardian ad litem and guardians.    Mr. Larkin in a blatant and obvious attempt to silence me and any other attorney who might protest filed ambiguous and misleading averments claiming that I was making some unspecified, unidentified, and idiopathic false statements concerning judicial officials.       Ms. Denison was accused of publishing the statements on her blog even though 47 USCA 230 provides her with complete immunity.     Mr. Larkin was aware of 1) that the statements that were published were all based upon sworn affidavits of the family members and friends of victims, and 2) the lack of denial by the averred miscreant.     Mr. Larkin was also aware that the statements were all protected by the First Amendment and several years prior a bunch of judicial officials including lawyers, judges, and court personnel went to jail for attempting and participating in a not to dissimilar stunt.
 
Never the less Larkin and attorneys employed by the State of Illinois to serve in the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission commenced a concerted effort to silence any attorney who sought to protest the criminal conduct of elder cleansing i.e.   the railroading of senior into a guardianship wherein the guardians isolated the victim from his/her family, his /her liberty interest, and whatever assets the victim might own possess or otherwise have viable claim.     After the cottage industry of judicial officials and those who aid and abet the criminal process is completed that victim is assisted to perform an involuntary assisted suicide.
 
Up to this point in time anyone who is taking the time to read this e-mail knows that I’ve made this statement dozens of times and in a dozen different ways; however, Mr. Tim Larkin sat me down this week to point out that while everything that I’ve said to this point in time is accurate and presents a horrible cancer that threatens to destroy the core values of America,  Congress and the Justice Department have been much more specific in informing the public as to how twenty-first Century America expects its disabled people to be treated.    Thus, the Americans with Disabilities Act.
 
The ADA is not another of those acts that congress or a legislature enacted so that some political hack could go back to his district and tell the public how he passed legislature that was going to bring world peace to *****.     It is a credo!     It is a manifesto!      And it says that America society shall accommodate the deficiencies of its disabled so that they will enjoy America just as if they were not disabled.     To indicate that this is serious stuff, the exceptions are few but they are significant.   Certain self-inflicted disabilities are not covered.  
 
What does this mean?    It means that when Adam Stern reports that Mary Sykes does not want **** and Mary is recorded on a video and pens a written statement that she wants ***** the Court or other provider is required to make reasonably available ***** for Mary.     It also means that if Mary is capable of doing her banking, visiting her sisters, jawing with her younger daughter the guardian has no power or ability to interfere.    The Cynthia Farenga or Peter Schmiedel excuse of the family agitating Mary is not available, applicable, appropriate or even allowable.    The ravaging of Mary Sykes’ estate even with a Court order is a violation of ADA.    I do not have to go into detail as the ADA cases and the position of the Justice Department on the subject are a matter of public record.   This public record is presumed to be KNOWN to lawyers such as Larkin Guzman, Black, Stern, Solo, Farenga, Schmiedel etc.   
 
What this means therefore is that Larkin, Guzman, Black, Stern, Solo Farenga, Schmiedel et al have acted in concert to deny Mary Sykes, Alice Gore ***** their Civil Rights and protections provided for pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act.     It also means that all those who have acted in concert with them directly or indirectly are also guilty.      The active participation in a scheme to violated the Civil Rights of a disabled person is a very serious offense and must be addressed.     ADA provides for substantial penalties for the violations.
 
As evidence of these violations I incorporate by reference the following official files:
 
1)      The bogus disciplinary proceedings including documents filed in the various courts in the cases of myself, Ms. Denison, and any other attorney who was directly or indirectly involved in a guardianship case.     (These files will  demonstrate that all attempts by private citizens to obtain an ‘accommodate’ for a disabled person was thwarted by not only Larkin, Guzman, assorted judicial officials, but a host of other co-conspirators.)
2)      The Probate Court files maintained by various Circuit Courts clerks in guardianship cases such as Sykes 09 P4585, Gore, Wyman, Tyler etc in Illinois
3)      GA0 reports to Congress
4)      Citizen complaints and protests to lawyer disciplinary commissions concerning the actions of certain judges  such as Connors, Stuart, Reynolds guardian ad litem such as Stern, Farenga, Schmiedel, Solo, administrators such as Larkin, Guzman, Black,
Supra, I referred to the incident involving Gloria Sykes.   Gloria Sykes is the younger daughter of Mary Sykes.    As part of a treatment for a disability Ms. Sykes has a ‘helper’ or ‘companion’ dog.    This animal is essential to Ms. Sykes’ health.   Such is a disability that is recognized pursuant to ADA.     The threat of a guardian ad litem to ‘kill’ Ms. Sykes treatment dog does not qualify as an “accommodation”     The arbitrary refusal of Attorney Black and Attorney Larkin to not allow Gloria to have the dog present with Gloria as she testifies in not an acceptable accommodation under the act.     This is especially true as the excuse made was a bold faced untruth – Larkin’s attorney claimed falsely that the building would not allow the animal in the building.
Reasonable accommodation is the LAW OF THE LAND.     When we elect Jerome Larkin dictator he can change the law.    Until that date he should be required like every other citizen to comply with the law.      
 
Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 23, 2014 9:08 AM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Tim NASGA , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Chicago FBI , “FBI- (” , Cook County States Attorney , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “JoAnne M. Denison” , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , Cook Sheriff , Bev Cooper , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC”
Subject: OVER-REACHING – criminal violations of civil rights – 

Overlooked in so many of the Elder Cleansing cases is square one!    In Sykes, it appears that Mary was declared incompetent by the agreement of the two guardian ad litem and the petitioner.  (see Adam Stern e-mail to Gloria Sykes).    In Wyman the determination was even more venal.    Judges in each of these cases ‘rubber stamped’ the determinations of the members of the cottage industry of elder cleansing and even though everyone knows that criminal conduct has occurred nothing has been done except CYA and cover-up.

The insidiousness of the cover-up by Mr. Larkin and the IARDC comes clear when we realize that guardianship is by its nature a deprivation of liberty and property rights and human rights of a citizen.    Everyday I and others receive anguished letters from family of the victims of elder cleansing who are aggrieved that villains are ravaging their loved ones and robbing them of all dignity.     The frustration extends to courts that are manned by judicial officials who are no more than rubber-stamps for the miscreants, law enforcement that claims to have its hands tied, and political operatives who have their hand in the till.    

 

Illinois’ corruption cost per capita $3008.    The guardianship frauds aid to the total!     By statute the person making application for a guardianship to be imposed on a fellow citizen has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the incompetency.      This is not an easy burden and it is not intended to be; however, as the Sykes file 09 P4585 reveals all it took was the agreement of several miscreants and Mary Sykes’ life was snatched from her!      In her evidence deposition Judge Connors revealed her attitude and her disdain for not only the statutory mandates but the case law, to wit:

Test of incompetency

Test applied in determining judicially whether a conservator should be appointed is whether the person is capable of managing his own affairs.   Matter of Conservatorship of Browne, App.1976, 35 Ill.App.3d 962, 343 N.E.2d 61 ;   Macdonald v. La Salle Nat. Bank, 1957, 11 Ill.2d 122, 142 N.E.2d 58 , appeal dismissed 78 S.Ct. 330, 355 U.S. 271, 2 L.Ed.2d 257 .

Evidence was insufficient to establish that mother was a disabled person, in action to adjudicate mother incompetent and appoint a guardian; two physicians, both who had recently examined mother, found that she exhibited no cognitive disabilities or mental conditions, and that she was well-adjusted and capable of managing her own personal and financial decisions.   Williams v. Estate of Cole, App. 1 Dist.2009, 333 Ill.Dec. 27, 393 Ill.App.3d 771, 914 N.E.2d 234 . Mental Health 135

Test which is applied in judicially determining whether conservator should be appointed for incompetent person is whether individual is capable of managing his person or estate.   Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health 105

To simply establish certain disabilities is alone insufficient to support determination of incompetency, for purposes of appointing conservator;  evidence must also show alleged incompetent’s incapability of managing her person or estate.   Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health 105

Capability to manage one’s person, for purposes of appointment of conservator, does not resolve itself upon question of whether individual can accomplish tasks without assistance, but rather whether that individual has capability to take care and intelligently direct that all his needs are met through whatever device is reasonably available under circumstances.   Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health 105

In proceeding for appointment of conservator for alleged incompetent, an 81-year-old woman who had voluntarily entered nursing home after giving her son power of attorney over her estate, record was barren of any evidence showing alleged incompetent’s incapability of managing her person or estate, and, in fact, supported contrary conclusion.   Matter of McPeak’s Estate, App. 5 Dist.1977, 11 Ill.Dec. 349, 53 Ill.App.3d 133, 368 N.E.2d 957 . Mental Health 135

Neither conclusion of an attorney that elderly individual was incapable of handling her business affairs nor unsubstantiated statements of two doctors to effect that it was in best interest of individual to have a conservator appointed was sufficient to establish that individual was so incompetent as to require the appointment of a conservator for her estate.   Matter of Conservatorship of Browne, App. 3 Dist.1976, 35 Ill.App.3d 962, 343 N.E.2d 61 . Mental Health 135

The belief of a person upon religious or political questions cannot be made a test of his sanity.   Belz v. Piepenbrink, 1925, 149 N.E. 483, 318 Ill. 528 . Wills 40

On an application for the appointment of conservator the true question is whether the person has sufficient mental capacity to transact ordinary business,–take care of and manage his or her property.   Snyder v. Snyder, 1892, 31 N.E. 303, 142 Ill. 60 .

The test of insanity depends upon the object to purpose for which the insanity is to be proved and what might be regarded insanity in one case would not necessarily be insanity in another.  No definite rule can be laid down which will apply to all cases alike.   Snyder v. Snyder, 1892, 31 N.E. 303, 142 Ill. 60 .

On an application for appointment of conservator the true question was whether the person had sufficient mental capacity to transact ordinary business,–take care of and manage his or her own property in view of § 37, R.S.1874, p. 685, making that the test of whether conservator should be continued.   Leefers v. People, 1907, 123 Ill.App. 634 .

 

The Legislature has defined the purpose of guardianship so as to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, to wit:

 

Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations    755 ILCS 5/11a-3

 

As everyone is aware – most of the guardianships that are under our discussion are ultra-vires usurpations of the Civil and Human Rights of the disabled person.   No-one can appropriately justify removing the alleged incompetents who are the subject of these discussions from contact with family members, friends, and prior activities. 

By the definition of most civilized and intelligent people the mining of the teeth of a elderly persons for the gold in her teeth is not the promotion of her well being!   Whether a judge authorized the action or not – such is exploitation!   Yet, as part of the cover-up Jerome Larkin and the IARDC wrote the Coopers to inform them that there was no ethical violation – indeed, the ethical violation was reporting the same!   

Let me suggest to you that when a corrupt judge enters an order finding that a particular individual is incompetent under the provisions of the Illinois Act that judge subjects himself/herself and the appointees to the Americans with Disabilities Act criterion.    Thus, the Court is limited to entering orders that are limited “to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations”   Ergo, the Judge who allows that guardian to place the ward in a nursing home against the wishes of the family, 300 – 500 dollars awards of Attorney fees and guardianship fees are all ultra vires and criminal conduct.    

The State and Federal law both mandate that the guardianship is an accommodation tool and nothing more!!!!!    Thus, involuntary segregation of the ward from family and friends is not only improper but more criminal conduct!  

PURSUANT TO 18 USCA 4  LET THIS E-MAIL BE A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THAT IN THE MARY SYKES CASE AND MANY MORE GUARDIANSHIP CASES HEREIN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS JUDICIAL OFFICIALS ARE IGNORING THE EXPRESS PROVISIONS OF ILLINOIS LAWS, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, AND CIVIL RIGHTS AS THEY ALLOW FAVORED LAWYERS AND OTHER PERSONS TO DEPRIVE SENIOR CITIZENS AND OTHERS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.     LET THIS ALSO BE A FORMAL COMPLAINT THAT MR. JEROME LARKIN AND A NUMBER OF HIS SENIOR ATTORNEYS ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE VIOLATION OF ADA AND HUMAN RIGHTS including but not limited to committing various other and different felonies such as theft, exploitation, fraud, perjury, mail fraud, wire fraud etc.    [the MARY SYKES CASE  09 p 4585 Pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois is a prime example.]

 

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Email to Dr. Huffin —

Dear Readers;

After talking to dozens and dozens of probate court room victims and their families, I think we pretty well know that people generally do NOT escape the probate court room debacle psychologically unscathed.  In fact, I am absolutely certain that most of you have learned that there are simply hugely damaged victims of court room abuses.

I received an email from someone today that had a byline of the following book:

Legal Abuse Syndrome by Ms. Karin Huffer, Mft and I bought it and was surprised at right off the bat, how she nailed the repeated saying of Legal Abuse Syndrome clients:

1) I am a a good person, clean living person, but this (LAS) is “cruel and unusual” punishment

2) the actions of (court room attorneys) are cruel and unusual, they are not normal, they are persons without souls, they have no conscious, etc.

3) what kind of a lawless country is this, where the courts allow liars and thieves to ruin people’s lives?

4) everyone says Chicago is so corrupt and no one does anything about it.  The judges let the attorneys run corrupt courts (or vice versa–the attorneys help the judges run corrupt courts).

5) the victims feel numb, depressed, disconnected and vulnerable, they many rant and rage, they may have uncontrollable rages, they often feel a need to scream and shout at everyone, or send dozens of emails before and after court appearances, esp.  sometimes, they may win on a point (visitation, or get a citation to discover dismissed, or some counts against them dismissed) and they are sooo rattled in court, they don’t even know that the judge actually handed them a win.

6)  they can’t find an attorney because either they can’t afford one, and/or when they try to talk to an attorney, they come off as emotional, disconnected, illogical and confused over facts and situations.  They know they have been gravely and severely harmed, but associate social concepts with their harm (lying as a claim, when defamation or slander is the claim, fraud on the court when they mean perjury, etc)

7) being disillusioned and depressed as an American citizen is common.

Links:

On ebay:  http://www.ebay.com/itm/Legal-Abuse-Syndrome-Huffer-Karin-M-f-t-/360730427562?pt=US_Nonfiction_Book&hash=item53fd3580aa

On Amazon:

Also check out Ms. Huffer’s videos on Youtube:

So Ms. Huffer, kudos, you’re nailing it in this book and I highly recommend the book to all of my probate victims.  Even if you don’t think you are a victim, if you feel scared, terrified, confused–any of these, before and after court appearances, this book may help you and at $7.99 on Kindle (read it on your computer in seconds, you don’t need a Kindle reader, just a PC or laptop), it should be a great help for many of you out there.

JoAnne