Unknown's avatar

About Joanne M Denison

Former Patent and Trademark Attorney practicing in Chicago, Illinois accepting clients nationwide. We also did trademarks, general intellectual property and business litigation. See our website at www.DenisonLaw.com. Now suspended for 3 years by the Illinois Atty Regn and Disciplinary Commission for blogging about corruption and telling truths that the ARDC wants to cover up. And while I am doing that, I will continue on my blogging work. Now I work full time on court corruption and corruption at the ARDC and JIB (Illinois attorney and judge discipline boards)

More Fraud in Healthcare–this time from a Hospice Nurse

Sick of Fraud

By   /   January 9, 2015  /   Comments Off

Hospice programs offer medical services and emotional support to patients who are facing the end of their life. Hospice workers are required to be licensed and certified in order to provide this specialized care. (Obviously, you wouldn’t want someone who is not qualified to administer your end-of-life care plan. The point is to stick around as long as possible, not exit this world early because of a caretaker’s mistake.) An article published in The Dallas Morning News follows the story of a woman who stole the identity of a registered nurse and used it to get a job as a hospice worker at eight different hospice companies over a three-year period of time.

The story states that the woman did apply to take a nursing exam, but her application was rejected because the university where her coursework was supposedly completed was not accredited. Since she was unable to obtain a medical license the correct way, she stole the driver’s license, Social Security number and other personally identifiable information of another woman who happened to be a registered nurse.

See more on this story at watchdog.org

http://watchdog.org/191846/sick-of-fraud/?roi=echo3-24451127512-24810895-b274f1b36e53245e488301658820784d

From Ken Ditkowsky–plenty of employment in Saudia Arabia and N. Korea for Larkin and his ilk!

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jan 8, 2015 10:35 AM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Tim NASGA , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , BILL DITKOWSKY , Janet Phelan , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Ginny Johnson , Bev Cooper , Cook County States Attorney , FOX News Network LLC , Diane Nash , Barbara Stone , Scott Evans , Fiduciary Watch , “Y. ACLU” , Illinois ARDC , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Edward Carter , Glenda Martinez , Cook Sheriff
Subject: PLEASE CHECK AND DETERMINE IF JEROME LARKIN HAS ANOTHER DISCIPLINARY EMPLOYMENT.

Illinois and the Illinois ARDC under the administration of Jerome Larkin and his friends in the cottage industry of elder cleansing have demonstrated to America that the First Amendment can be abrogated by corrupt political and judicial officials.    Larkin’s racially motivated ethical prosecution of Attorney L Amu should have raised a hue and cry – it did not.    His ethically challenged attempt to remove JoAnne Denison’s blog should have brought out the tar and feathers – it did not.
We are now taking up a collection to send Mr. Larkin to Dubai or North Korea where he will be not only welcome but fit in much better.    The attached article explains all!
He was also fined $270k and his family had to flee to Canada for protection.
Atty Ken Ditkowsky
Chicago, IL Suspended by the ARDC for blogging the truth!
From Joanne;
Mr. Larkin and his litigation staff–Attys Leah Black, Sharon Opryszek and Melissa Smart would well fit in.  So would Steven Splitt for taking on my case up to the Review Board.
I wonder when the cat o 9 tails will be shipped to the Illinois ARDC so they can do their job properly and stop attorneys from telling truth, covering up strings of felonies and promoting and insisting on a code of silence that benefits only crooks and thieves?
JoAnne

From Barbara Stone — to the Florida Judges Labarga and Soto $1.4 mil drained by thieves

From: barbara stone
Sent: Jan 8, 2015 8:34 AM
To: chiefjustice@flcourts.com, bsoto@jud11.courts.org

JoAnne M Denison

Subject: Anatomy of a judicial racketeering scam – Michael Genden corrupt criminal racketeering ring.

TO:  Chief Justice Labarga and Judge Soto:

 

The anatomy of Michael Genden’s racketeering court is so very simple – the purest form of criminal racketeering: 

 

Payment to a criminal enterprise for crimes and fraudulent acts they themselves orchestrate.

 

Michael Genden’s criminal racketeering “court” consists of 3 matters:

 

  1. Fraudulent Petitions, mock hearings on Pre-signed and illegal Orders for various types of isolation and caging of my mother: fraudulent illegal stay away orders, isolation orders, orders of no contact, restraining orders, injunctive orders, no visitor orders, orders denying my mother of freedom of religion, retaliation orders and other  restriction and secretive orders.
  2. Fraudulent and illegal petitions and orders for legal fees, guardians fees, court fees and accomplice fees  for the orchestration, preparation and implementation of the fraudulent and illegal petitions and orders
  3. Barbara Stone’s frantic pleadings to object to the corrupt, retaliatory,criminal actions.

This illegal judicial activity culminated in the issuance of an illegal, unconstitutional and fraudulent order prepared in conspiracy between Michael Genden and Roy Lustig entitled “Order prohibiting Barbara Stone from filing anymore Pleadings, motions and objections in this court”. 

 This order was issued in a corrupt and illegal effort to retaliate against Barbara Stone for providing irrefutable evidence of Michael Genden’s scam racketeering ring that is epitomized in Roy Lustig’s fraudulent, perjured, fabricated, fake and staged petition attached entitled “Petition for Court Direction as to the Court Order Authorizing Hospital Visitation between the Ward and the Petitioner Dated November 15, 2013” which “petition” had nothing to do with its fake name. 

The petition, filed by Roy Lustig  was filed to accomplish 3 purposes:  1. extort fees for a fraudulent petition, 2. criminally and  illegally misrepresent the life threatening illnesses which Barbara Stone’s mother suffered and 3. Preposterously ask Michael Genden, a blathering arrogant idiot of a judge to act as medical authority to determine if Barbara Stone’s mother should have nurses see to her care rather than the miscreant “aides” who almost caused her death.

The medical conditions of Mrs. Stone were documented as exactly those that Roy Lustig fraudulently denied – pneumonia , malnutrition and dehydration among other life threatening illnesses caused by these criminals.  Thus Roy Lustig lied and perjured himself in his petition. The petition was never heard because it was not intended to be heard because it was a staged fake petition to charge fees to Mrs. Stone as evidenced by the one sentence email the following day indicating RN’s would be provided to Mrs. Stone which of course was not done because this is a racketeering ring and lies and deception are its foundation.

Roy Lustig is a fraudulent, perjured, fabricated, faked and staged purported “attorney” found guilty of crime by the 3rd DCA.  Barbara Stone reported this to Michael Genden repeatedly – Roy Lustig, like a child predator and molester is an adult predator and exploiter.

MICHAEL GENDEN KNOWINGLY, MALICIOUSLY AND VICIOUSLY PLACED AN ADULT PREDATOR IN CONTROL OF MY MOTHER AND ACTS AS A CONSPIRATOR TO HIS CRIMES.

You, the supervising judges know.  Thus you have no alternative but to suspend him and report his crimes.   This racketeering scam has been exposed. 

 Michael Genden is disgusting vermin who commits crimes of torture like those committed by Dick Cheney against war criminals.  Waterboarding by feeding tube, drugging, caging, isolation.  The same crimes engaged in by Dick Cheney are the acts of Michael Genden and  Jacqueline Hertz and other adult predators of their ilk. 

My mother’s assets were approximately $1,600,000.

This is Michael Genden’s money trail of embezzlement:

Larry Levy, my mother’s fake pretend Court appointed attorney who  was described by

Michael Genden as the “mouthpiece of the guardians” – his disdain for my mother’s 

best interest could not be more obvious:                                                                                                          $25,000

 

Steven Dolchin, the first attorney predator of my mother who represented the

guardians and thus purportedly “represented” my mother but in fact never met her:                                      $50,000

Either Dolchin got fired or he actually was repulsed by the guardian crimes and

was replaced by Roy Lustig, a criminal thug with a law license who together with Jacqueline

Hertz’s spouse, Steven Hertz is the mastermind assassin of the elderly and their rights.  He  was hand picked by this cartel as he has already been found guilty of crimes by the 3rd DCA so he needed no indoctrination into the racketeering ring – he was a professional criminologist:                                                                    $225,000

 David Pollack a cohort in the racketeering ring. 

Michael Genden illegally presigned orders awarding his fees for representing the adult predator guardians in the federal action I broughtagainst them notwithstanding the fact that it is illegal for him to force my mother topay David Pollack as he has absolutely nothing to do with her and is acting contrary to herinterest by abeting in the removal of her rights…

Racketeering at it’s purest in Michael Genden’s highly corrupt  court                                                                                                                                    $65,000

 

Eric Virgil acting in conflict of interest as an “expert” for Roy Lustig’s illegal fees to Whom Barbara Stone had already consulted with and did not hire as she found him a corrupt Sleazy adult predator:                                                                                                                                                     $  2,000

Blaire Lapides, “guardian” as a result of her own criminal acts, unvetted andin violation of scam oversite requirements:                                                                                                                                                                    $63,000

 

Anthony Romano, the first fraudulent “guardian” who fraudulently Petitioned for “guardianship” of my mother                                                                                                                                                                                                                               $60,000

 

Candice Trusty, criminal racketeer extraordinaire who has precipitated theSlow death of hundreds if not thousands of elderly vulnerable adults like my mother And the isolation of their children for which I have evidence.                                                                                                                                                               $90,000

 

Alan Stone documented embezzlement (understated estimate) :                                                                                                                                                         $625,000

 

Other cover up conspirators- Don Eisenberg and Lapides’ cohorts:                                                                                                                                                 $200,000

TOTAL:                                                                                                                            $1,405,000

 

All of this fraud, crime, racketeering and extortion is the result of my objection to the administration of a laxative, Miralax to my mother that these scumballs regularly force on their victims as it causes “agitation” and heart and kidney failure.  Michael Genden extorted $1,400,000 from my mother and orchestrated an agenda of torture against my mother because I objected to her being administered a laxative.

 

Racketeering at its purest. 

 

IT HAS BEEN EXPOSED. 

 

I expect my mother to be returned to me today and in order for you to mitigate your liability for the myriad of other victims, for you to shut down his court. Further, send me confirmation of your disciplinary action against Michael Genden pursuant to your December, 2024 order.  Please contact me immediately to arrange for the return of my mother.

 

Barbara Stone

212.994.5482

212.994.5481 (fax)

Bstone12@hotmail.com

Bstone 575@gmai.com

From Joanne:

It is time to take the profit motive out of guardianships and go to an all volunteer system where only NFP’s and volunteers are used, with oversight from the city, county and state to ensure these massive bills never occur again in ANY guardianship

How it feels to be a probate victim by anon

Re:  How it actually feels to be a probate victim–by anonymous

(this probate victim is currently writing complaints, grievances and requests to the authorities)

I am a morning person, so will do this in the morning, it is kind of painful for me to rehash all of this story each time, it is as if I living the pain each time, really.
This has been a very painful traumatic thing in my life, and I dread even talking about this, but I have to get used to this, what a battle for me this is, it literally pains me in my chest and around my heart area.
And to be abused, defamed, and completely bullied by a Bully and his Sociopath attorney, really makes me wonder what on earth have I ever done to deserve this?! They are like a permanent headache, permanent pain in the neck, literally.
Most of my life I was a bookworm over achiever,  upper middle class, classic, attractive to all, young lady;  and now, these abusive people seem to hate and abuse me for no reason whatsoever! Other than I have the respect and love of someone whom they wanted to own, to use his money for themselves, and I am in the way I guess!!
Look forward to answering all questions in the morning. Thanks ken,

G——-

On Judge Michael Genden in Florida from Barbara Stone

Dear Chief Justice Labarga and Judge Soto:

Although Chief Justice Labarga issued an order for the Chief Justice to discipline their judges, that does not appear to be working as the probate court in South Florida, in fact all over the State are a vehicle to loot and plunder the assets of elderly disabled persons.

This is particularly true in Miami, Broward and Palm Beach.  In Michael Genden’s court, which no longer even has a veneer of legitimacy he has been a very busy accomplice to the looting and draining of my mother’s assets.  He of course has no jurisdiction to do that and the Federal Courts cannot abet his crime regardless of the unlawful and unconstitutional orders they issue.

Attached are all the petitions by predator attorneys who have emerged from the woodwork and guardians for fake bills in an illegal guardianship that any reasonable person could see has nothing to do with the best interest of my mother.

No court can authorize a judge’s crimes.  The DOJ mandate  prohibits the abetment of starving, drugging, extorting and exploiting the elderly.     Michael Genden is engaged in crimes that any reasonable person and now he is using my mother’s assets to cover up.  There is substantiation of crimes that almost caused my mother’s death.  There is substantiation of embezzlement.

I don’t like Michael Genden.  In fact, I find him repulsive.  He was offended in his court and stated on the record that I don’t respect him.  He prohibits me from having witnesses in his court.  He does nasty illegal acts.  He and Lustig change transcripts.  He changes his orders. He ordered me out of his court at the beginning of this matter.  He has terrorized my mother and I.  As you can see, all of the abuse he has heaped on my mother and he is causing her death and my arrest for saving her life was because I objected to her being administered a laxative as shown below.

The fact that he is still on my mother’s case and still on the bench is a disgrace.  He is an emperor with no clothes. Justice Labarga and Judge Soto, please have him removed from the bench – I am only one of his dozens of victims who are being blind copied.

The crimes being committed against my mother and his other victims have four elements:    1) the placing of a senior citizen or disabled person into a guardianship; 2)   Isolation of the senior or disabled person from family and prior life; 3) restriction of senior or disabled person’s liberty and/or property; and 4) the subsequent threat to the life of the senior or disabled person.

The guardianship relationship creates a fiduciary relationship between the disabled person and the person appointed as guardian and therefore, the theft (unauthorized control) of the person or property of the disabled person or senior citizen is a felony.      Thus, it is incumbent on every citizen to report the criminal activity of elder abuse and exploitation.      18 USCA 3 points out the scope as to who should be reported and 18 USCA 1 (and 18 USCA 371) provides authority for the prosecution of those who act in concert:

  1. a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b)   Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.      18 USCS § 2

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571 [18 USCS § 3571]) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.    18 USCS § 3
Michael Genden’s ordering over $1,400,000 of my mother’s assets to be drained is not an accommodation to her.  Forcibly removing her from her home is not an accommodation to her.   Isolating her from her family and prior life is not an accommodation to her. life.  Isolating her from her spiritual leader is not an accommodation to her. Allowing a person like Roy Lustig who have been found guilty of crimes by the 3rd DCA is an abuse of power and misconduct.  Forcing her to have surgery to implant a feeding tube so it can be laced with drugs is not an accommodation.

Michael Genden has no immunity or authority to violate the law.  He is a common variety abuser as no doubt you are aware.  He paraded into probate court clueless about the needs of elderly and vulnerable adults.

He arrogantly approved an illegal settlement agreement whereby others removed all of my mother’s rights.  This is illegal.  He is a blathering idiot if truth be told and he is taking taxpayer money to commit fraud.  When I submitted the attached petition seeking that he hold Roy Lustig who has already been ruled by the 3rd DCA as committing criminal acts, instead of holding Lustig responsible , Genden illegally ordered that I can no longer file pleadings in his corrupt court.

Genden is not impartial by any stretch of the imagination. Certainly he should not be on the bench in my matter and his remaining on the bench is any matter is improper.

All of the  scenarios he orchestrated are shameful.  They are crimes.  He is tainting you and all other judges.

Genden came into the probate court without an inkling of the guardianship or probate law or any awareness of the myriad of laws protecting the elderly.  He was a liability at the start and is now a public relations nightmare.  He and Roy Lustig orchestrated my arrest  for protecting my mother and now they are in a frenzy to empty my mother’s assets and cause her death to shield and cover up her conduct..

Mark Adam’s grandmother death was caused in guardianship.  Hs grandmother’s photos will follow.  Attached are the photos of my mom with me before Genden terrorized her and the after photos.   My mother almost died and looks like a child in a third world country.  Mark’s grandmother was so drugged she looks like a prisoner of war.   I have dozens and dozens of photos of abused elderly people caused by your courts.

Michael Genden is ordering the death of my mother and the draining of her assets.  He has caused the death of others and the draining of their assets of whom I am aware and who are being blind copied

Death by court order in the 11th circuit probate court. So many court ordered deaths    

Jeff Weinkle, one of the attorneys who is copied on Pollack’s petition to extort fees is an attorney who I paid to defend me from Michael Genden’s vicious entrapment, of which you are aware. Instead Weinkle sabotaged me and purposely colluded to leave Genden’s illegal isolation order in place.  It was shown to be illegal by the Miami Police but the law has no place in Genden’s court.

Fred Glickman, another attorney who is copied on Pollack’s extortion demand precipitated my mother’s being humanly owned. These so called attorneys are involved in the theft of assets by court order.
Blaire Lapides the “guardian” who is seeking the draining of my mother’s asset does not have credentials.  Oh yes, Michael Genden  has a fake guardian, an attorney who is a criminal, another guardian who is a known predator in this blood sport.

As you may be aware, Genden  isolated my mother, an elderly woman on the basis of a laxative. A laxative.  I objected to her being administered a laxative called Miralax.   It was pulled from the shelf by the FDA for causing heart and kidney failure in elderly people.  Nothing is too demented for Michael Genden – the laxative king of death.

I and the other victims are reporting these crimes pursuant to 18 USC 4.  Attached are articles that describe the abuses that occur in probate court.   These thugs who benefit from elderly disabled people are committing special victims crimes.

All of the diversions and fake orders are obvious scenarios by this racketeering industry to steal.
If these are acting with altruistic intention, they should provide their services for free.  Not for $1,400,000.

The guardianship was built on a fraud.  And perpetuated – Michael Genden can’t seem to get over his convoluted fixation that he purported  I “authorized” an agreement, I can’t authorize an illegal agreement.  Or the commission of his crimes.

Michael Genden –   Terrorizing elderly and disabled person.  Michael Genden – court ordered abuse and exploitation of my mother because he doesn’t understand a laxative.  A laxative.  Michael Genden’s reign of terror over a laxative.  Daughter falsely arrested for objecting to the administering of a laxative to her mother .Michael Genden has admitted his orders are based on fraud.  He knows her assets have been embezzled by Alan Stone at the time of the guardianship.

Michael Genden is a huge public relations nightmare – his engaging in and abetting  criminal activity is just not politically correct.   I sought his protection for me and my mother and he embarked on a terror campaign.

By copy to Joanne Denison this will request she post this information virally.  The reporter who freed several captives of human ownership in central Florida just won an Emmy for his coverage.  This is the blockbuster story of the decade and the press is finally reporting the abuse, arrests and fraud (to follow).

Please put an end to Michael Genden’s  reign of terror, abuse and draining of my mother’s assets.

Sincerely,

Barbara Stone
212.994.5482
212. 994. 5481 (fax)

From Larry Suffredin.org – what do the twin daughters of Judge Timothy Evans do for a living?

It would appear they just help out daddy during the day, but they claim he is not really their boss:

As Cook County’s chief circuit judge, Timothy C. Evans has been his twin daughters’ boss since 2001, but an aide says he steers clear of any matter involving them.

According to the Code of Judicial Conduct, “A judge should exercise the power of appointment on the basis of merit, avoiding nepotism and favoritism.”

Catherine Evans is paid $95,307.68 a year as a legal systems analyst in the Office of the Chief Judge, county payroll records show. She was making $39,255.84 when her father became chief judge. She serves as assistant director of a program that provides free legal help to people trying to become guardians of minors.

Cynthia Evans makes $89,627.20 as deputy jury administrator. She was making $42,224 when her father became chief judge. She oversees the jury assembly room at the Daley Center.

The 41-year-old twins have received promotions since their father was elected chief judge in 2001, after nine years on the bench, the payroll records show. Catherine Evans got a promotion a year after her father succeeded Donald O’Connell as chief judge. And Cynthia Evans has subsequently gotten three promotions, the records show.

Thanks  to Larry Suffredin for this enlightening report.

Next, we would like publicly available, on the internet, court records and documents.  Those belong to the people and there’s no reason to have to go to the Daley center and go to computer terminals and printers by division (Probate, Law, Chancery, etc.) to get images of court documents in 2015.  That is ridiculous.  Also, the charge is outrageous $1 for the first few pages, fifty cents and twenty five cents when Pacer is 8 cents per page and you can sit on your butt at your office to get copies.

When is that going to end.  I understand the state legislature passed a law to get these high copy charges, it’s still ridiculous in light of the 8 cents a page copies for Pacer

From Ken Ditkowsky — N Korea is closer than we think

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jan 6, 2015 11:46 AM
To: “bstone12@hotmail.com” , RosANNa Miller , Mark Adams , Probate Sharks , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , “FBI- ( (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Fiduciary Watch , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Janet Phelan , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Chicago FBI , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Candice Schwager , BILL DITKOWSKY , The Wall Street Journal , Bev Cooper , Diane Nash , Scott Evans , Doug Franks , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Cook County States Attorney , FOX News Network LLC
Cc: JoAnne M Denison , “kev_pizz@hotmail.com” , Robert Sarhan , Skender Hoti , Angela Woodhull , Antoinette Greywol , Lisa Meuche , Kathleen Dunn , Kathleen , Dr Sam Sugar , Glenda Martinez , “jmaddux@tampabay.rr.com” , Beverly Newman , Teresa Lyles , Theresa Pizzarello , Louise C Elmes , “frangrady.rn@gmail.com” , k_bakken , Alyece Russell , John Lobianco , Sherrin Smith , Alicia Rook , Carol Holden , Patty Reid , Elliot Bernstein , Ginny Johnson , “bonnie.reiter@yahoo.com”
Subject: Did we wake up this morning and discovery that we are in North Korea?

 Over the past several years the families of the victims of elder cleansings have been sending to the Attorney General of the United States, the Justice Department, the United States Attorneys as well as local law enforcement a sincere plea to Enforce the basic Constitutional Protections as connoted in the Bill of Rights, the Guardianship laws as written by the various State Legislatures and by the Congress of the United States in the Americans with Disabilities Act.   
 
Congress enacted a law that in words and phrases states:
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.    18 USCS § 4
 
Elder Cleansing has four elements:    1) the placing of a senior citizen or disabled person into a guardianship; 2)   Isolation of the senior or disabled person from family and prior life; 3) restriction of senior or disabled person’s liberty and/or property; and 4) the subsequent threat to the life of the senior or disabled person.       
 
The guardianship relationship creates a fiduciary relationship between the disabled person and the person appointed as guardian and therefore, the theft (unauthorized control) of the person or property of the disabled person or senior citizen is a felony.      Thus, it is incumbent on every citizen to report the criminal activity of elder cleansing when it occurs.      18 USCA 3 points out the scope as to who should be reported and 18 USCA 1 (and 18 USCA 371) provides authority for the prosecution of those who act in concert:
a)   Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b)   Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.      18 USCS § 2
·          
—————
 
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571 [18 USCS § 3571]) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.    18 USCS § 3
 
Literally hundreds of citizens have written to law enforcement seeking as an intelligent, honest, complete and comprehensive investigation of this situation.    The result has been not only unsatisfactory, but in many cases outright retaliation and loss of valuable rights in retribution.      In Illinois using the guise of administrator of the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission Jerome Larkin has made a laughing stock of the Illinois and the United States Constitutions (and particularly the First, Fifth and Fourteen Amendments.)     
 
The Mary Sykes case filed in Cook County, Illinois (09 P 4585) illustrates the scenario and the need for law enforcement to act vigorously and bring law and order back to Illinois [1] .     So obscene is the process that in the Gore case the Nazi practice of harvesting the gold filings from the teeth of victims was reinstated.     Dozens of cases have been reported to law enforcement and it does not appear that a single miscreant has been prosecuted for these felonies.      The rape of the Estates of the elderly and the disabled continues unabated. The Larkin response to these serious strings of felonies primarily consists of nonsensical letters such as “that attorney is now your guardian ad litem” or there’s nothing wrong with pulling a few gold teeth!
 
So arrogant are the Illinois miscreants that Jerome Larkin openly and notoriously attempts to intimidate the legal profession with disciplinary proceedings that are even less fair than the kangaroo gulags or North Korean criminal trials.    An ISIS mullah deciding the fate of Christian who looks like a Jew comes closer to due process.    Larkin and his crew of over-paid attorneys make it very clear that they are not concerned about the facts or the law, their mission is to intimidate the legal profession so that they do not comply with 18 USCA 4 and in particular the money flow to the cottage industry of elder cleansing [2] .
 
The cases that have been brought to the attention of law enforcement from just about every State in the Union all have a common tread – they have the elements of elder cleansing and in particular sport the appointment of “guardians for profit”  isolation, segregation of the victim from prior life and family, the control of life savings and assets of the victim,  unjust enrichment of the guardian for profit, and the absence of a reasonable accommodation or any illness or disability of the senior or disabled person. [3]
 
Few of the cases that are the subject of elder cleansing meet the ADA criterion of reasonable accommodation.    There can be no reasonable accommodation if the degree and extent and nature of the disability is not ascertained!     It is just common sense that no reasonable accommodation can be made in a vacuum.      Illinois as an example makes it clear that the need for a guardian be proven by clear and convincing evidence and that the guardianship is limited to a reasonable accommodation, to wit:
Sec. 11a-3.   Adjudication of disability; Power to appoint guardian. (a) Upon the filing of a petition by a reputable person or by the alleged disabled person himself or on its own motion, the court may adjudge a person to be a disabled person, but only if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the person is a disabled person as defined in Section 11a-2 [755 ILCS 5/11a-2]. If the court adjudges a person to be a disabled person, the court may appoint (1) a guardian of his person, if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning the care of his person, or (2) a guardian of his estate, if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he is unable to manage his estate or financial affairs, or (3) a guardian of his person and of his estate.
(b)   Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations .    755 ILCS 5/11a-3   
 
Using the Sykes case as an example who does the appointment of two guardian ad litem and a plenary guardian meet the criterion of the American with Disabilities Act – reasonable accommodation?       The transferee of the alleged disabled person’s wealth to ‘clouted favorite attorneys”   to the common citizen is not a reasonable accommodation.        The segregation of the disabled person from his/her family and the loss of liberty is not a reasonable accommodation.      It therefore follows that both State and Federal Law are openly and notorious violated.
 
The Laws of the United States of America have to have some meaning.      When Congress enacts a law public officials such as Jerome Larkin and the Courts of the State of Illinois – and the several States have to honor them or civilization breaks down.    Being an elderly person in Illinois might not be politically correct, but this form of political correctness is barred by the Illinois Constitution, the United States Constitution, and the statutes of the United States of America including but not limited to 42 USCA 12203.     
§ 12203. Prohibition against retaliation and coercion
(a)   Retaliation. No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this Act or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this Act.
(b)   Interference, coercion, or intimidation. It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this Act.
(c)   Remedies and procedures. The remedies and procedures available under sections 107, 203, and 308 of this Act [42 USCS §§ 12117, 12133, 12188] shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to title I, title II and title III [42 USCS §§ 12111 et seq., 12131et seq., 12181 et seq.], respectively.  42 USCS § 12203
 

The impotent protests by the various victims of elder cleansing (and their families) appear not be heard by law enforcement, but,   they should be as it is in everyone’s self-interest (as everyone ge ts ol


[1] Mary Sykes was an active and articulate senior citizen who discovered that her older daughter had made an unauthorized withdrawal from Mary’s back account.     When the daughter made threats Mary made application to the Circuit Court for a Protective order.    It has been charged that the daughter used the Cook County corruption system to effectuate a defense and to get herself appointed as the plenary guardian for Mary.    An examination of the Court file 09 P 4585 demonstrates the extra=judicial nature of the proceedings and the presence of the elements of elder cleansing, to wit:  1) all the due process requirements set forth as jurisdictional in 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 were ignored.    Not only was the petition for guardianship defective – it failed to disclose Mary’s two surviving siblings – but no hearing was actually held, the judge and a guardian ad litem counseled the petition on who to contact to obtain a certificate of incompetency, and the Illinois jurisdictional requirement of 14 days prior notice to the nearest family members was ignored.    (The guardianship was a rubber stamp order agreed to by the two guardian ad litem and the petitioner’s attorney – see Adam Stern e-mail to Gloria Sykes).   2)  Mary was isolated from her prior life.    It also appears that the Presiding Judge was notified by one of the two guardian ad litem that the proceedings were being conducted in the venue.    3) Mary’s assets came under the control of the guardian appointed by a court lacking jurisdiction ******.
[2] An ARDC attorney asked me on cross examination whether I was repentant for writing the Attorney General of the United States a letter complaining about elder cleansing.    As you see I am not repentant and continue to write and ask for an honest complete and comprehensive investigation of this National scandal.
[3] The jurisdictional criterion of 755 ILCS 5/10 (Illinois Guardianship Act) is routinely ignored in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court sitting in Cook County, Illinois.     The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions are jurisdictional; however, it appears to consider the reporting of the violations by attorneys to be ethically challenged and warranting long suspensions of the right to practice law.
§ 755 ILCS 5/11a-10. Procedures preliminary to hearing
·         Sec. 11a-10.   Procedures preliminary to hearing. (a) Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to Section 11a-8 [755 ILCS 5/11a-8], the court shall set a date and place for hearing to take place within 30 days. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to report to the court concerning the respondent’s best interests consistent with the provisions of this Section, except that the appointment of a guardian ad litem shall not be required when the court determines that such appointment is not necessary for the protection of the respondent or a reasonably informed decision on the petition. If the guardian ad litem is not a licensed attorney, he or she shall be qualified, by training or experience, to work with or advocate for the developmentally disabled, mentally ill, physically disabled, the elderly, or persons disabled because of mental deterioration, depending on the type of disability that is alleged in the petition. The court may allow the guardian ad litem reasonable compensation. The guardian ad litem may consult with a person who by training or experience is qualified to work with persons with a developmental disability, persons with mental illness, or physically disabled persons, or persons disabled because of mental deterioration, depending on the type of disability that is alleged. The guardian ad litem shall personally observe the respondent prior to the hearing and shall inform him orally and in writing of the contents of the petition and of his rights under Section 11a-11 [755 ILCS 5/11a-11]. The guardian ad litem shall also attempt to elicit the respondent’s position concerning the adjudication of disability, the proposed guardian, a proposed change in residential placement, changes in care that might result from the guardianship, and other areas of inquiry deemed appropriate by the court. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act [740 ILCS 110/1 et. seq.] or any other law, a guardian ad litem shall have the right to inspect and copy any medical or mental health record of the respondent which the guardian ad litem deems necessary, provided that the information so disclosed shall not be utilized for any other purpose nor be redisclosed except in connection with the proceedings. At or before the hearing, the guardian ad litem shall file a written report detailing his or her observations of the respondent, the responses of the respondent to any of the inquires detailed in this Section, the opinion of the guardian ad litem or other professionals with whom the guardian ad litem consulted concerning the appropriateness of guardianship, and any other material issue discovered by the guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem shall appear at the hearing and testify as to any issues presented in his or her report.
o    (b)   The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent’s request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. The respondent shall be permitted to obtain the appointment of counsel either at the hearing or by any written or oral request communicated to the court prior to the hearing. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation.
o    (c)   If the respondent is unable to pay the fee of the guardian ad litem or appointed counsel, or both, the court may enter an order for the petitioner to pay all such fees or such amounts as the respondent or the respondent’s estate may be unable to pay. However, in cases where the Office of State Guardian is the petitioner, consistent with Section 30 of the Guardianship and Advocacy Act [20 ILCS 3955/30], where the public guardian is the petitioner, consistent with Section 13-5 of the Probate Act of 1975 [55 ILCS 5/13-5], where an adult protective services agency is the petitioner, pursuant to Section 9 of the Adult Protective Services Act [320 ILCS 20/9] , or where the Department of Children and Family Services is the petitioner under subparagraph (d) of subsection (1) of Section 2-27 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 [705 ILCS 405/2-27], no guardian ad litem or legal fees shall be assessed against the Office of State Guardian, the public guardian, the adult protective services agency, or the Department of Children and Family Services.
o    (d)   The hearing may be held at such convenient place as the court directs, including at a facility in which the respondent resides.
o    (e)   Unless he is the petitioner, the respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition and a summons not less than 14 days before the hearing . The summons shall be printed in large, bold type and shall include the following notice:
                        NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
   You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that 
you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a 
guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is 
attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge’s name and phone number is:
   If a guardian is appointed for you, the guardian may be given the right to 
make all important personal decisions for you, such as where you may live, 
what medical treatment you may receive, what places you may visit, and who may 
visit you. A guardian may also be given the right to control and manage your 
money and other property, including your home, if you own one. You may lose 
the right to make these decisions for yourself.
    You have the following legal rights:
§  (1)   You have the right to be present at the court hearing.
§  (2)   You have the right to be represented by a lawyer, either one that you 
retain, or one appointed by the Judge.
§  (3)   You have the right to ask for a jury of six persons to hear your case.
§  (4)   You have the right to present evidence to the court and to confront and 
cross-examine witnesses.
§  (5)   You have the right to ask the Judge to appoint an independent expert to 
examine you and give an opinion about your need for a guardian.
§  (6)   You have the right to ask that the court hearing be closed to the 
public.
§  (7)   You have the right to tell the court whom you prefer to have for your 
guardian.
   You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. 
If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that 
a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or 
canceled if you do not attend.
   IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A 
GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE 
GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE.
Service of summons and the petition may be made by a private person 18 years of age or over who is not a party to the action.
o    (f)   Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing.    755 ILCS 5/11a-10

From Gloria Sykes — she wants a party for her mother on her 96th birthday.

Joanne M Denison's avatarMaryGSykes.com

From: GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com>
To: Peter Schmiedel Carolyn’s 2nd attorney <pschmiedel@fischelkahn.com>; Cynthia GAL <cfarenga@comcast.net>; Adamm Stern GAL <sternlaw@ameritech.net>; carolyn Toerpe <toerpecm@vvsd.org>; carolyn Toerpe <toerpecm@wil.org>; Kristin Toerpe <kristin.toerpe@gmail.com>
Cc:k_bakken@att.net” <k_bakken@att.net>; scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>; “kenditkowsky@yahoo.com” <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>; Elaine NAsga <elaine@abusiveguardianships.com>; LUCIUS VERENUS <verenusl@gmail.com>; Lucinda <michiganadvocacyproject@gmail.com>; Sgt. Tom Kammerer Naperville Police <kammerert@naperville.il.us>; Chief David E.. Dial Naperville <masonp@naperville.il.us>; Michael Hoffman Naperville Police <hoffmanm@naperville.il.us>; states attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>; “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>; Sherrif Dart <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>; “illinoisadvocacy@y-me.org” <illinoisadvocacy@y-me.org>; “ecarter@atg.state.il.us” <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>; mary wooley state police <mary_woolery@isp.state.il.us>; Annie NASGA <lilati@aol.com>; barbara nasga <bmontrond88@gmail.com>; Maddie nasga <poopsiebaloopsie@yahoo.com>; Rose West NASGA…

View original post 1,399 more words

From Gloria Sykes — she wants a party for her mother on her 96th birthday.

From: GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com>
To: Peter Schmiedel Carolyn’s 2nd attorney <pschmiedel@fischelkahn.com>; Cynthia GAL <cfarenga@comcast.net>; Adamm Stern GAL <sternlaw@ameritech.net>; carolyn Toerpe <toerpecm@vvsd.org>; carolyn Toerpe <toerpecm@wil.org>; Kristin Toerpe <kristin.toerpe@gmail.com>
Cc:k_bakken@att.net” <k_bakken@att.net>; scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>; “kenditkowsky@yahoo.com” <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>; Elaine NAsga <elaine@abusiveguardianships.com>; LUCIUS VERENUS <verenusl@gmail.com>; Lucinda <michiganadvocacyproject@gmail.com>; Sgt. Tom Kammerer Naperville Police <kammerert@naperville.il.us>; Chief David E.. Dial Naperville <masonp@naperville.il.us>; Michael Hoffman Naperville Police <hoffmanm@naperville.il.us>; states attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>; “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>; Sherrif Dart <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>; “illinoisadvocacy@y-me.org” <illinoisadvocacy@y-me.org>; “ecarter@atg.state.il.us” <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>; mary wooley state police <mary_woolery@isp.state.il.us>; Annie NASGA <lilati@aol.com>; barbara nasga <bmontrond88@gmail.com>; Maddie nasga <poopsiebaloopsie@yahoo.com>; Rose West NASGA <rosewest@windstream.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 4:30 PM
Subject: Mary G. Sykes’ demand to spend her 96th birthday with the People she loves and trusts…
Peter Schmiedel, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga and Carolyn Toerpe,
            January 5, 2015 will be my mother’s 96th birthday.  Under normal circumstances, I and other family and dear friends, would have been celebrating her life by throwing her a surprise party – or at least, taking her out to a place where we all know she would love to be and share with all of us.  But as it has been since this unconstitutional, abusive, discriminatory, and financial exploitative hostage of my mother, (commencing on June 30, 2009), she has been denied association with all people she loves and trusts.  In fact, I recall with great intensity that on January 4, 2010,  I filed an emergency motion for visitation with my mother, and on January 5, 2010, being that Toerpe’s other attorney (Harvey Jack Waller) had silently withdrawn, Adam Stern showed up and argued on behalf of Toerpe and prevented my mother from spending a few hours with me on her birthday.  Reading the transcripts would break the heart of even the most hardened person, but clearly give an understanding that Adam Stern could not allow my Mother to associate with and enjoy herself in the company of all of the people she loves and trusts.  Nonetheless, under the Title II of the ADA, my mother has a right to spend her birthday with whomever she wishes, and I know she wants most to spend it with me, and her sister Yolanda and so, MAKE IT HAPPEN.
            When I spoke with her on Christmas Eve, as I reported to you, she was very ill: her throat was swollen, soar, and she could barely speak: she had chills and was seriously fatigued.  As I also reported to you, Toerpe was monitoring and controlling every word my mother spoke, and when my mother told me she had the chills, “and this can’t be good” she said, Toerpe did nothing.  But when mother tried to speak to me in private, and had her mouth close to the telephone receiver, Toerpe commanded her, “Take the phone away from your mouth,” she said, like Hitler ordering another hundred children, elderly or ill people into the “Showers”.
            As the Illinois and Chicago Bar Associations stated, Judge MacCarthy is not competent to be a judge and therefore, ignorant of the law.  I’m certain you Peter Schmiedel and Adam Stern, feel empowered after the 29th December, 2015, but I would not be so quick to pull out the pillow(s) and suffocate my mother!  In deed what happened was upsetting, but any NORMAL person would have been saddened by the actions of this judge — as well as your actions, or non-actions.  Peter Schmiedel, the ex parte communications with the judge was evident and well orchestrated.
            Since you are all protected by the ARDC it is a waste of my time, or the time of any of the many court watchers present to file any complaints against you Peter Schmiedel or Adam Stern.  That said, be certain I have not been intimidated and I will not stop doing all that can be done within the law to protect my mother and save her life.  In the meantime, while litigation continues, it’s my Mother’s 96th birthday and she would like to be with the people she loves and trusts and so, I will pick her up around 2 p.m.  We will go to her favorite restaurant in the Norwood Park area.  People present will be Yolanda, Art, Kathie, and Arty Bakken, Scott and Doris Evans, and R.S.V.P.’s are still coming in from a few more family and dear friends.  If need be, I will ask for the Naperville Police to be present in the exchange.  As I am a lawful person, also be assured that my mother will be brought back to Toerpe’s abode, if that’s where she is living, or to the nursing home where Toerpe has locked Mother away promptly.  It is and has always been my intention to resolve this issue through the courts, and so as I have, there is where justice will be served.
            I will begin to call Toerpe’s home phone and cell phone at 9 a.m.  I will call every 30 minutes or so until I speak to my mother and make certain she is okay and ready for her surprise 96th birthday party.  If I’m not allowed to speak to my mother and visit with her, I will take the silence as something is terribly wrong and will do what I need to do to make certain law enforcement puts eyes on my mother.
            Again, this is my Mother’s 96th Birthday.  All of you have done a great job isolating and financially exploiting my mother – and preventing her from associating with me and all the people she loves and trust for six years: it’s time to stop the evil and give my mother what may be her last birthday alive, the gift of her life and that is a surprise party as I planed and held for her every year since my daddy, her husband, died in 1998.  Let me close with a quote from Gerry Spence’s famous plea in closing argument,
            ““… So the smart-aleck boy sauntered up to the old man and said, “Old man, what do I have in my hands?”  And the old man said, “You have a bird, my son.”  The he boy said with a malevolent grin, “Old man, is the bird alive or is I dead?”
            And the old man, with sad eyes said, “The bird is in your hand, my son.””
            And so, Peter Schmiedel, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, and Carolyn Toerpe, my mother’s life – well being, happiness – is (unfortunately) in your hands.
            Like thieves in the night, you’ve stolen everything from my Mother she held dear: her home of 52 years, her lifelong savings, memories and most of all, from  your discrimination against her because she is an older person, you’ve stripped her of the relationships with all family and friends she loves and trust. January 5, 2015 is my Mother’s  96th birthday, for God’s sake!  You have prevented her from celebrating her birthday with family and dear friends for 5 years: don’t let this one pass without her right to associate with me, her sister Yolanda, and the Bakken family, Doris and Scott Evans, other dear friends and family and me.  This is her right as an American Citizen.  Let her have one good memory of the love and laughter we – family and friends mother’s trust – will share with her as she has had celebrating all of her birthdays, ‘cept for 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 .
            There’s nothing normal about being discriminated against, held against her will, financially exploited and emotionally and physically abused — and denied all association with the people (Mother) loves and trusts.  All of this is so not normal, that to the average person, it’s unbelievable.  But for those who are actually reading this and missed the “Schmiedel” show on December 29, 2014 in Courtroom 1804, let me assure you, what happened and is happening to my mother can and may happen to you.  In sum, I believe in our laws and I know that my mother, and all older persons and people with disabilities who are discriminated against are protected under Title II of the ADA.  It’s now time for those who are in authority to step up and do the right thing…
            I’ve copied law enforcement just because, and the IARDC, only because I’m creating a paper trail:  No one can say they were not included or informed.  I’m also sending a copy to Chief Judge Evans for his file on the Sykes case.  Hopeful that one of the public entities will comply with the Title II of the ADA.
                                                Gloria Jean Sykes
                                                Mary G. Sykes’ youngest daughter.
                                                Mary G. Sykes’ named POA for Healthcare
                                                Mary G. Sykes’ best friend.
 
 
Gloria Jean Sykes
BELIEVE (Be-Live) LLC

From Atty Barbara Stone–court watchers needed in Miami Florida

I would like to listen in, but I already have a call tomorrow, so I can’t attend by phone.

Barbara is going to ask the judge to remove her ankle bracelet since she was only trying to protect her mother from a drug not approved by the FDA for use in older people called Miralax which is some sort of polymer (plastic) used to soak up water and is used as a harsh chemical laxitive.

For this she was charged with something along the lines of “interfering with the care of a disabled person” and a bracelet was put on her.

Of course, she has been banned from trying to see her mother for the typical issues:  objecting to excessive fees by court appointed attorneys, the probate attorney, tied in service providers, the nursing home fees, a feeding tube for merely eating too slow, and all sorts of tortures for the wards and their families.

Please pray for Barbara and Helen Stone that they might be reunited and that Helen may be returned to Barbara and they can return to New York.

thanks

JoAnne

From Atty Barbara Stone–the problem as she sees it

Thanks (othre probate victims) for “getting”it.

This is a special victims crime.
There are other terms for it:
Check it out in wikipedia: Senicide or geronticide is the abandonment to death, suicide or killing of the elderly.

The only thing worse than what these perpetrators of crimes against humanity have done is the victims or family members who stay silent or abet or align themselves with and pander to these criminals for their own agenda.

These criminals will ignore us as long as we stay silent and allow them to. Labarga got 3 letters from us that I am aware of. All different in tone giving him a completely mixed message. From how I see it, he is abetting human trafficking and should be reported.

We have lost our loved ones, our jobs, our home, our livelihood. Our families have been destroyed. They have body snatched our loved ones, stolen our legacies.

If we don’t speak up in protest of depraved crimes like this, then why should the perpetrators stop.

The DOJ issued a mandate in December 2014 trying to put this debacle back on the states.

Wake up people.

The only thing worse than those who do this are those of us who do nothing or defeat us by pandering to them.

Pandering to criminals. As we have seen over and over, THAT DOES NOT WORK. In fact it empowers them. U need look no further than the newly enacted albeit unconstitutional bill rolled out by Passidomo who brazenly made theft and adult embezzlement and exploitation lawful .
Passidomo by the way should be the subject of a Petition for impeachment.

Everything must be done in unison or nothing will happen.

Nothing will happen unless we make it happen.

No one else will do it.

The complaint will go to every major press organization. It will be filed Tues. I need the 5 to 10 most egregious criminal acts and examples of human trafficking in everyone’s case.(I.e., forcible removal from home against one’s will, waterboarding by feeding tube, drugging, forced to be in a nursing home against an elder’s will, etc.) I am firming up a commitment from national media.

Wake up and speak up. They are “gauging” how much they can get away with by seeing our response. G-, Rosanna, R–, A– and A– get it. This won’t stop until you all get it and speak up.

Barbara Stone
Tel: 212.994.5482
Fax: 212.994.5481

Congratulations to Sylvia Rukek, a tireless volunteer, for being recognized by Money Magazine

https://webmail.earthlink.net/wam/msg.jsp?msgid=207234&folder=INBOX&isSeen=false&x=1426719141#14aac4d4219c7620_14aabd8a8d33d6e5_14aa75a3e168f092_2

Sylvia has done a lot of hard work for many, many probate victims, working long hours each day for no pay.

I am glad that Money is recognizing the fact there is a need for this assistance and that there are courtrooms to clean up.

Kudos and many, many blessings to Sylvia for her very hard work.

She is truly an angel.

JoAnne

From Atty Barbara Stone in Florida–Press Release and her mother is suffering terribly

PRESS RELEASE

All documents and photos mentioned herein maybe accessed at:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwLXdUNU5jR21pVUE&authuser=0

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAstone-BG

stone-AG2 Stone-AG

RE:           Racketeering scam run by attorneys such as Fred Glickman, Roy Lustig and slimy predators who call themselves “guardians” and in conspiracy with thug judges like Michael Genden to defraud our elderly, disabled vulnerable adults and commit terror tactics like Dick Cheney employed on war criminals for which he is being held accountable

Contact:   Barbara Stone 212.994.5492 (tel) 212.994.5481 (fax)  bstone12@hotmail.com / bstone575@hotmail.com

Date:         January 2, 2015

Attached is the Federal lawsuit I filed in an attempt to save my mother’s life from a racketeering enterprise known as “guardianship” who operate out of probate courts throughout the country that are human trafficking, money laundering rings utilized by Fred Glickman, Roy Lustig, David Pollack and a myriad of thugs with a bar license to terrorize senior adults like my mother and loot their assets and cause their death by aggravated abuse and terror tactics.

Despite the clear mandate of the Department of Justice that adults such as my mother must be integrated into the community, Michael Genden and his band of accomplices operate above the law and violated Federal and State laws and the mandate of the ADA and the Olmstead Act.

Attached is the Department of Justice mandate issued on December 15, 2014 affirming the integration directives established by the ADA and the Olmstead Act that mandate seniors like my mother be integrated into the community, not isolated.

(see prior post on DOJ letter)

The DOJ states therein:

“The Department of Justice and OCR enforce the rights of people with disabilities to live integrated lives free from unnecessary segregation in institutions. Specifically, Title II of the ADA requires that “no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from  participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.”2 As directed by Congress, the Attorney General issued regulations implementing Title II, which are based on regulations issued under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.3 The Title II regulations require public entities to “administer services, programs, and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities.”4 possible . . . .”

The preamble discussion of the “integration regulation” explains that “the most integrated setting” is one that “enables individuals with disabilities to interact with nondisabled persons to the fullest extent   In Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), the Supreme Court held that Title II’s integration mandate prohibits the unjustified segregation of individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, compliance with Title II’s integration mandate requires that public entities reasonably modify their policies, procedures, or practices when necessary to avoid discrimination.6 The obligation to make reasonable modifications may be excused only where the public entity demonstrates that the requested modifications would “fundamentally alter” its service system. Moreover, the ADA and the Olmstead decision are not limited to individuals currently in institutional or other segregated settings. They also apply to persons at serious risk of institutionalization or segregation. For example, a public entity could violate Olmstead if it fails to provide community services, or reduces those services, in a way likely to cause a decline in health, safety, or welfare leading to an individual’s eventual placement in an institution.”

These directive have and are been ignored by Fred Glickman and the Federal Courts in a series of lawless opinions in violation of laws and the Department of Justice mandates apparently in order to collude with and protect predator judges like Michael Genden who engage in thug like activities and whose courts deteriorate to a terrorist, Mafia like threatening operation to embezzle from vulnerable defenseless elderly citizen like my mother.

Fred Glickman brazenly engaging in fraud on the court by his email to “confer” a veiled threat.

My matter, like all of the vile, corrupt, fraudulent, scam “guardianships” is all about fraud.  There is so much fraud, it is virtually impossible to expose it all much less keep up with it all.  The fraudulent guardianship was originated by Fred Glickman, a self-serving con artist who is an integral part of this racketeering scam that was unbeknownst to me when I misguidedly thought I was protecting my mother from the financial fraud and physical abuse she suffered by my estranged sibling Alan Stone.

Katherine Williams may not be enlightened.  Still operating in the dark ages of slavery and entrenched in the highly corrupt Miami courts that are rated the most corrupt in the country, apparently she opined that I, the daughter of an elderly disabled person who is being viciously abuse by thugs have no “standing” to object to the attempted premeditated murder of my mother by thugs like Roy Lustig and Fred Glickman.  I no longer participate in her proceeding because I have no use or patience for lawless judges who render unlawful and unconstitutional “edicts” that result in death sentences for elderly disabled citizens like my mother in collusion with highly corrupt judges like Michael Genden who violates DOJ mandates.

The parties involved knows of the thug tactics used by Roy Lustig, the purported “attorney” for criminal guardian scammers.  Lustig has subjected my mother, Helen Stone and other elderly victims to horrors that Dick Cheney used on war criminals for which he is now being held accountable.

My case, like all others starts with a fraudulent guardianship and the isolation of their prey. Roy Lustig separated me from my mother because I objected to the use of a substance called Miralax that predators who call themselves guardians routinely administer to elderly and disabled people. I did not know at the time the FDA had pulled it off the shelf as it was contraindicated for elderly people, causing their heart and kidneys to shut down. All I knew was that it was harmful for my mother.

Roy Lustig’s predecessor took me to court, filed a fraudulent petition turning inside out the facts stating I authorized my mother to be given “unauthorized” medication. My attorney at the time was actually the owner of a guardian company acting in conspiracy with this crap – slimy lawyers who use lies, fraud and perjury to isolate and put the lives of victims  and their family members in purgatory. Thus I was isolated from my mother on the basis of a fraud. More important, my mother was isolated from me. Isolation is the key for thugs like Roy Lustig and the scam guardian enterprise so they can commit their crimes in secrecy. This opened the door for them to terrorize my mother, deprive her of food, medical attention, services and drug her mercilessly for being “agitated” a condition which they intentionally cause to use for their own purpose of drugging her.

My mother was admitted to the hospital by emergency where she was diagnosed with dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia, infection, hernia, fractures and a host of other life threatening condition where she almost died. To punish her further because of the abuse they inflicted, her stomach was cut open by force and without her consent to implant a feeding tube. This is the means by which it is convenient for the scum ball guardians to not have to take the time to feed her and to be able to conveniently lace my mother with drugs through the feeding tube.  In the vicious world of guardianship where nothing is too deranged, I was separated from my mother FOR OBJECTING TO A LAXATIVE. And thereafter my mother almost died because she was so badly abused by attorney thugs and the predator guardians scam operators with whom the concoct criminal acts.

As an example of the mound of filthy fraud, after my mother was almost killed by these swamp creatures, I asked that the aides who were stealing her food and drugging her be replaced by RN’s who spoke literate English.  In response, Lustig filed the attached “Petition” slandering me and without a thought to the fact that he was committing fraud and perjury  denied that my mother  suffered dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia and other life threatening conditions, complete fabrications as this was the medical report by the doctors (which Lustig tried mightily to deny my access).   The next day, he sent an email stating the aides would be replaced by RNs.  Which of course did not occur, because Roy Lustig would not know how to tell the truth because he is a swamp creature from the depths of purgatory with a Florida Bar license protecting him.  He charged my mother for this fraud on the court and to engage in her abuse.  He thereafter filed charges against me for making a phone call to try to locate my mother after they removed her from the hospital.

When this crap is exposed in court,  it only gives Roy Lustig and the other criminals posing as attorneys more devious ways to create sham “petitions” “ore tenus motions” “confidential” reportings and other disgusting crap.  Lustig used Eric Virgil, a piece of vermin with a law license as the “expert” to testify for his fake bills when I objected to the bills.  this is the game…. object and these creatures from the swamp put their heads together to figure out how to make more money.  If we don’t object, they steal less and become more empowered.   I had previously consulted with Virgil – of course he was conflicted out and of course the fees are a bogus scam but in the lawless courts of guardianship where scum like Lustig and Virgil are protected by judges  THERE IS NO LAW, there is no accountability.  There is only collusion with their participating in the slowly played out premeditated murder of our loved ones by isolation, drugging and abuse. 

My mother’s guardianship is not legal because of issues at the onset WHICH I CANT EVEN DISCLOSE TO THE highly corrupt probate court because they will be covered up.    Every day, I and all of the other family victims are stunned that our loved ones are being deprived of their lives and their families and their homes and their possessions.

My dad was in the army.  He got an honorable discharge and married my mother, the town beauty of a small own.  He worked hard and saved for his family.  This criminal cartel, Mafia like mobsters have raided my family and terrorized us.  These criminals are devastating mine and other families.

Jacqueline Hertz, the fabricated schemer who calls herself a “guardian” has been at the “guardian” game for so long that she routinely puts herself on the trust as a beneficiary of her victims that she snatches into her human ownership.  She is shown as Esq on various documents.  She is the antichrist.  She hand-picked Roy Lustig, who has already been found to be a criminal to participate in her crime spree against my mother.

This predator extraordinaire who loots the elderly, disabled children, his own partner, nursing homes, shady loan provider and much more.  Attached is a copy of some of his volumes of bills filled with the schemes he orchestrated to steal from my mother and keep her isolated from her daughter.  After he deliberately caused me to be arrested for saving my mother’s life, he went into overdrive.  He “consulted” with the police, the SA, the “guardians” the slimy aides, etc etc.  He went to criminal court, he went to probate court, he went to mock hearings – this was the bogus probate proceeding of the century.   My fragile, vulnerable defenseless mother is dying because of the abuse he has heaped on my mother.  He stripped her rights and her assets.  Roy Lustig is causing my mother to die.  Fred Glickman knew or should have known.

Is this story disgusting enough yet? Apparently not to Miami Courts

For you see, I am an attorney and because Roy Lustig and his racketeer guardians abused my mother so horrifically and almost caused her death, when I intervened, he fraudulently caused me to be arrested for protecting my mother and saving her life.

I have been falsely arrested twice for seeing my mother. For protecting her and intervening when she was admitted to the hospital where she almost died because she was so badly abused. I have been in jail twice wondering if I would be killed by other prisoners for saving my mother’s life. The people in jail could not believe this depravity goes on the courts.  They understood that it is a crime for someone to abuse an elderly vulnerable person and cause her to be admitted by emergency to the hospital for life threatening conditions where she almost died.

They understand that aggravated abuse of an elderly person is a felony crime under Florida Statutes 825. They understand that it is a felony crime for an attorney to bogus up and stage litigation that he orchestrates for the purpose of fabricating fees. They understand that is a first degree felony under Florida Statutes 825.

They understand the parties have violated the Department of Justice mandate.

WHY DOESN’T THE MIAMI COURTS?

As you can see from the attached information, removing my mother from me wasn’t sufficient abuse for Roy Lustig who purports to represent my mother in this otherworldly fraudulent scheme of guardianship so he illegally directed the “nursing facility” (which is in fact a caging facility where rampant Medicare fraud is committed) where she is kept against her will to deny her ability to see her Rabbi of 15 years. Because attorneys like Roy Lustig are protected” by highly corrupt “judges” like Michael Genden, it is not of the slightest concern to him that his is violating Federal and Florida abuse laws, the constitution, my mother’s civil rights and due process, the ADA, the Elder Justice Act, the Olmstead Act, the Patient Bill of Rights and a myriad of other laws.

Google ROY LUSTIG. He has been reported as stealing from disabled children by stealing the funds of United Cerebral Palsy. He have been accused of stealing from his partner. He has been accused of making shady loans. He has been accused of stealing from his homeowner’s association. He is involved with many other schemes of which I am aware and will inform you once you commence an investigation.

Attached is a copy of my mother’s photo with me at a surprise party I gave her before her becoming dead in the eyes of the law in an illegal guardianship and before she because Roy Lustig’s prisoner and his embezzled paycheck.   Attached is a photo of her in the hospital after suffering unimagible abuse.

This is a call for the disbarment of Roy Lustig and the impeachment of Michael Genden and for them to turned over to law enforcement as the 3 rd DCA professed was going to happen when they rendered their opinion finding Roy Lustig guilty of crimes.

Since the time Roy Lustig and the guardian scam operators almost killed my mother, my mother has been forcibly removed from her home and forced into a nursing home where she is held against her will in a locked down unit. She has not been allowed out. She is in a feeding tube when she is perfectly capable of eating, she is diapered when she is perfectly capable of performing her functions, she is bound in a wheelchair and not allowed to stand – shoved down when she attempts to get up although she is perfectly capable of walking and her body is being shut down by psychotropic drugs.

I pray each day she will hold on for another day and those engaged in these crimes agaist our vulnerable loved ones will be held accountable. Please do not allow my mother to die. Roy Lustig, Michael Genden and Fred Glickman and the guardian cartel are committing crimes against humanity as do the other monsters who abuse and steal from the elderly and disabled.

Family members of predator attorneys like Roy Lustig have been devastated.  They watch in horror as this scene goes on all over the State of Florida when predator vultures like Roy Lustig roam. Their lives are in ruin emotionally and financially.  They have lost their homes to foreclosure paying legal bills to attorneys who take their money on the pretense they will rescue their loved ones but they are really working in collusion to perpetuate the fraud.  They have gone into bankruptcy.  Their families are shattered.

Attached is a statement from the DOJ which requires that seniors must be integrated into the community.  What makes Roy Lustig above the law?  What gives him the right to deprive my mother of her life?  What gives Roy Lustig the right to deny my freedom?

A court cannot circumvent criminal acts.  Michael Genden has no jurisdiction and no immunity for committing crimes.

Start this year by cleaning up the courts and removing the lawyers and judges who are involved in crimes against our most vulnerable citizens – the elderly and the disabled.. Our loved ones are being slowly drugged, isolated and abused to their death.

It is the New Year.  My mother is in a fraudulent, illegal guardianship.  Mu beautiful 87 year old mother is locked up in a facility against her will, forcibly removed from her home, caged, chemically restrained, isolated, her stomach cut open to implant a feeding tube laced with drugs, her personal possessions looted and her assets almost drained. Roy Lustig has embezzled over $150,000 of her assets and she has no idea who he is.  In total, over $1,400,000 of her assets have been drained by these predators.   There is nothing left.

  The media is all over my story. By copy to Joanne Denison and Candice Schwager, this will ask that they post this on their probate blogs and circulate it virally.

What are you going to do Florida Courts? How are you going to protect the public from predator attorneys and judges?

ROY LUSTIG AND MICHAEL GENDEN…..the Bernie Madoff of elder predators.   Fred Glickman, part and parcel of these crimes.

WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THE FLORIDA COURTS?  TO ABET AND COLLUDE WITH CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED BY JUDGES?

My mother’s life is in your hands.  The enforcement of the DOJ mandate is in your hands.
From Barbara Stone, JD, licensed attorney and probate victim.

All she wants is her mother back and to get the heck out of Florida.

From Barbara Stone–an open letter to the Florida Bar Assn President

She wants to know why her mother was 1) forcibly removed from her home; 2) given a drug that causes great harm to the elderly (Miralax) shutting down the kidneys and causing death; 3) drugged; 4) a feeding tube was implanted in her mother because “she ate too slow” at the nursing home; 5) she is confined to a wheelchair when she can walk and continually told to sit down with an alarm between her and the chair; 6) she is diapered when she can get up and go to the toilet–all for the convenience of the nursing home.

Mrs. Stone has an estate in excess of $1 million. She can well afford to live out her days in her home.  Barbara is fighting for this and both of us have been rebuked for merely asking to take Mrs. Helen Stone home to Barbara where she will have 24 hour nurses under a POA.

Roy Lustig and Mark Raymond are both fighting this, they say Barbara Stone has “no capacity” to take her mother home, etc.

Barbara Stone has filed valid bar complaints (and I will publish with her permission) all to no avail, the Florida Bar Association has dismissed these serious human and civil rights violations out of hand.

Mainstream media WON’T publish this truth.  They are either too worried about litigation, or old people don’t matter or they don’t want to get in the middle of ongoing litigation involving grandmas.

Please pray for Barbara, that she gets her mother and her life back.

JoAnne

Subject: An Urgent Open Letter to the Florida Bar

Date: Jan 1, 2015 9:15 PM

Attachments: An urgent open letter to the Florida Bar.pdf letter to Greg Coleman, Esq.pdf Probate Courts – human trafficking courts.pdf Financial fraud and guardian profiteering.pdf vulture guardians.pdf Activist Post Article – human trafficking.pdf lawyer arrested.pdf attorney arrested 2.pdf mom and me surprise 4.bmp mom in hospital.jpg

AN OPEN URGENT LETTER TO THE FLORIDA BAR

To:       Gregory Coleman, President of the Florida Bar

              Ramon A Abadin, President Elect of the Florida Bar

              David C. Prather – Candidate for President Elect of the Florida Bar

              Bill Schifino, Jr – Candidate for President Elect of the Florida Bar

  From: Barbara Stone and on behalf of other Family Members of Victims of Guardianship and Attorneys who use their Florida Bar License to Steal the assets of Elderly Disabled Persons,   use terror and criminal tactics to defraud their families and commit fraud on the Court

Contact:  212.994.5482 (tel) 212.994.5481 (fax) bstone12@hotmail.com
                       

Date:   January 1, 2015
________________________________________________________________________________

We are a group of family members who are being terrorized and threatened by Florida Bar attorneys who have conspired with guardian predators to engage in the conduct of Mafia-like thugs to destroy our families and loot their assets and force us into financial ruin in our efforts to protect our families.

We have personally met with Greg Coleman, we have pleaded with him, we have sent letters, we have notified the Florida Bar, we have each personally written to Greg Coleman, we have disclosed some of the attorneys involved, we have notified Greg Coleman under 18 USC 4, he is violating the law for his failure to report criminal activity, we hereby so notify you and that under 18 USC 371 and 241, all lawyers involved are engaged in a conspiracy.

We have informed him of the criminal activities of attorneys involved in the scheme known as guardianship. Attached is one of the many letters submitted to Greg Coleman that described this scam and the terror inflicted on the families.

Attached are articles that describe this atrocity.  The media and law enforcement are beginning to expose this crime against humanity with a vengeance.

Greg Coleman never responded.  He has not made this guardian scam the highest of priorities for the Florida Bar.  He has never accepted responsibility for licensing people who purport to be lawyers but who are actually engaging in tactics of street thugs and terrorists.  Greg Coleman knows of the thug tactics used by Roy Lustig, a Florida Bar attorney and others of his ilk who brings shame to the Florida Bar.  He has subjected my mother, Helen Stone and other elderly victims to horrors that Dick Cheney used on war criminals for which he is now being held accountable.

My case, like all others starts with a fraudulent guardianship and the isolation of their prey.  Roy Lustig separated me from my mother because I objected to the use of a substance called Miralax that predators who call themselves guardians routinely administer to elderly and disabled people.  I did not know at the time the FDA had pulled it off the shelf as it was contraindicated for elderly people, causing their heart and kidneys to shut down. All I knew was that it was harmful for my mother.

Roy Lustig’s predecessor took me to court, filed a fraudulent petition turning inside out the facts stating I authorized my mother to be given “unauthorized” medication.  My attorney at the time was actually the owner of a guardian company acting in conspiracy with this crap – slimy lawyers who use lies, fraud and perjury to isolate and put the lives of victims and their family members in purgatory.  Thus I was isolated from my mother on the basis of a fraud.  More important, my mother was isolated from me.  Isolation is the key for thugs like Roy Lustig and the scam guardian enterprise so they can commit their crimes in secrecy.

This opened the door for them to terrorize my mother, deprive her of food, medical attention, services and drug her mercilessly for being “agitated” a condition which they intentionally cause to use for their own purpose of drugging her.  My mother was admitted to the hospital by emergency where she was diagnosed with dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia, infection, hernia, fractures and a host of other life threatening condition where she almost died.  To punish her further because of the abuse they inflicted, her stomach was cut open by force and without her consent to implant a feeding tube.  This is the means by which it is convenient for the scum ball guardians to not have to take the time to feed her and to be able to conveniently lace my mother with drugs through the feeding tube.

In the vicious world of guardianship where nothing is too deranged, I was separated from my mother FOR OBJECTING TO A LAXATIVE.   And thereafter my mother almost died because she was so badly abused by thugs with a Florida Bar license and the predator guardians scam operators with whom the concoct criminal acts.

Is this story disgusting enough yet?  Apparently not to Greg Coleman.  He colluded with the Florida Bar to remove my license when I exposed the crimes being committed by Florida Bar attorneys.

For you see, I am an attorney and because Roy Lustig and his racketeer guardians abused my mother so horrifically and almost caused her death, when I intervened, he fraudulently caused me to be arrested for protecting my mother and saving her life.  Incredibly, Greg Coleman who knows of the deaths, the terror, the embezzlement that attorneys like Roy Lustig have orchestrated, has allowed this disgusting conduct to continue and perpetuate.

I have been falsely arrested twice for seeing my mother.  For protecting her and intervening when she was admitted to the hospital where she almost died because she was so badly abused.  I have been in jail twice wondering if I would be killed by other prisoners for saving my mother’s life.  The people in jail could not believe my story.  They understood that it is a crime for someone to abuse an elderly vulnerable person and cause her to be admitted by emergency to the hospital for life threatening conditions where she almost died.

They understand that aggravated abuse of an elderly person is a felony crime under Florida Statutes 825.  They understand that it is a felony crime for an attorney to bogus up and stage litigation that he orchestrates for the purpose of fabricating fees.  They understand that is a first degree felony under Florida Statutes 825. 

WHY DOESN’T GREG COLEMAN AND THE FLORIDA BAR?

I also wonder, why doesn’t Greg Coleman understand he is colluding in culture of crime.  Why doesn’t Greg Coleman call for the disbarment and arrest of attorneys who engage in terror tactics and plunder the assets of vulnerable elderly people.  Why would Greg Coleman tolerate the besmirchment of the Florida Bar with these creatures from the swamp.

Adria Quintela, the inside attorney for the Florida Bar who is using the same tactics as thug attorneys like Roy Lustig actually closed the file before she opened it when I sent her the attached information about Roy Lustig’s criminal conduct.   As you can see from the attached information, removing my mother from me wasn’t sufficient abuse for Roy Lustig who purports to represent my mother in this otherworldly fraudulent scheme of guardianship so he illegally directed the “nursing facility” (which is in fact a caging facility where rampant Medicare fraud is committed) where she is kept against her will to deny her ability to see her Rabbi of 15 years.

Because attorneys like Roy Lustig have been “protected” by the Florida Bar, it is not of the slightest concern to him that his is violating Federal and Florida abuse laws, the constitution, my mother’s civil rights and due process, the ADA, the Elder Justice Act, the Olmstead Act, the Patient Bill of Rights and a myriad of other laws.  Your organization has licensed a criminal.  And your Florida Bar has engaged in this abuse of authority for so long that Adria Quintela in violation of the same laws used my reporting of his criminal activities as an opportunity to forewarn Roy Lustig so that he could embark upon a new round of Machiavellian schemes against me.

Adria’s collusion with Roy Lustig worked as she intended. Roy Lustig then unleashed a fury of vicious Petitions against me and has been looting my mother’s bank account at the speed of light.  Because Adria gave him carte blanche to do so, tacitly giving him Florida Bar consent to his Mafia like terror, he submitted a 68 page bill for my mother to pay him the sum of almost $50,000 so he could abuse her in his latest round of terror that he waged against me to orchestrate fake and fraudulent bills.  He has now extorted over $150,000. Attached are some of his fraudulent bills filed with staged litigation he connived.  Any moron can see the only thing accomplished by the crap he submitted was the theft of my innocent, defenseless vulnerable mother who Roy Lustig has tortured and terrorized.

For Roy Lustig to have any involvement whatsoever in my mother’s matter is inexcusable at the onset because the Florida Bar should have disbarred him or taken drastic measures against him 10 years ago when he was found guilty of fraud on the court, repeatedly lying under oath and perjury by the 3 rd DCA.  The Florida Bar did nothing, thus leaving this criminal to prey on my mother and who knows how many other victims.

Google ROY LUSTIG.  He has been reported as stealing from disabled children by stealing the funds of United Cerebral Palsy.  He have been accused of stealing from his partner.  He has been accused of making shady loans.  He

has been accused of stealing from his homeowner’s association.  He is involved with many other schemes of which I am aware and will inform you once you commence an investigation.

Attached is a copy of my mother’s photo with me at a surprise party I gave her before her becoming dead in the eyes of the law in an illegal guardianship and before she because Roy Lustig’s prisoner and his embezzled paycheck.

This is a call for the disbarment of Roy Lustig and for the Florida Bar to turn him into law enforcement as the 3 rd DCA professed was going to happen when they rendered their opinion but it never did.  Have Roy Lustig investigated for his embezzlement of my mother and for the disabled children and the shady loans and the other schemes I will reveal to you once a meaningful investigation has commenced.  And remove Adria – she is an emperor with no clothes to whom you should have no fear – and an embarrassment to the Florida Bar.

Since the time Roy Lustig and the guardian scam operators almost killed my mother, my mother has been forcible removed from her home and forced into a nursing home where she is held against her will in a locked down unit. She has not been allowed out. She is in a feeding tube when she is perfectly capable of eating, she is diapered when she is perfectly capable of performing her functions, she is bound in a wheelchair and not allowed to stand – shoved down when she attempts to get up although she is perfectly capable of walking and her body is being shut down by psychotropic drugs.

I pray each day she will hold on for another day and the Florida Bar attorneys who are engaged in these crimes agaist our vulnerable loved ones will be held accountable. Please do not allow my mother to die.   Roy Lustig is committing crimes against humanity as do the other monsters who abuse and steal from the elderly and disabled.  Roy Lustig is the ideal candidate for disbarment – the3rd DCA has already found him guilty.  He runs a one man show when he eludes accountability.  He has perpetrated irrefutable crimes.

Start this year by removing the lawyers who are involved in crimes against our most vulnerable citizens – the elderly and the disabled..  Our loved ones are being slowly drugged, isolated and abused to their death.

It is New Year’s Day.  I have been preparing this letter to the Florida Bar for hours.  I can’t see my beautiful 87 year old mother who is locked up in a facility against her will, forcibly removed from her home, caged, chemically restrained, isolated, her stomach cut open to implant a feeding tube laced with drugs, her personal possessions looted and her assets almost drained.  Roy Lustig has embezzled over $150,000 of her assets and she has no idea who he is.

What did each of you do for the holidays?  Did you spend it with your families without the Florida Bar protecting criminals who are committing crimes against you and your families?

The media is all over my story.  By copy to Joanne Denison and Candice Schwager, this will ask that they post this on their blog and circulate it virally.

In order to evidence your commitment, I seek a response and commitment within 24 hours.

What are you going to do Florida Bar officers?  How are you going to protect the public from criminals with a Florida Bar License?

Enclosures

Top Page of Google News today–Wrongful Death of 95 year old linked to Probate court decisions

And from today’s top new story on Google, probate again raises its ugly head where family member split up a bonded couple.  In this case the split was even more unbearable when the couple, bearing different skin colors, was barred from marriage for decades–the 20s to the 1950s, due to miscegenation laws in the south.

http://news.yahoo.com/newlywed-man-95-dies-wife-taken-away-165117134.html.

It’s interesting they talk about the two sisters fighting, but don’t mention who the GAL is that let this happen or the judge.

New Illinois Eavesdropping Law covers up corrption

I believe this is the current version of the bill signed into law by Gov. Quinn.

Click to access 09800SB1342ham006.pdf

Very troubling about the bill is that it actually solves no problems and creates more.

First of all, as any honest Chicago lawyer or judge will tell you, or a litigant, the issue of altered court transcripts is huge.  Mine were altered at my ARDC trial.  Judge Stuart then about 6 weeks later “suddenly retired”.  Coincidence?  I think not.

In jurisdictions where the public are allowed to record the police, the incidence and costs of altercations litigated between the public and police drop dramatically.  Ditto for use of police cameras in uniforms and in the cars.  No surprise there.

Recording only help honesty, it does not help a crook.

The question is, who is putting the anti-recording measures in these bills and what do they have to hide?  Why won’t they let Illinois drop down or out of “most corrupt” state in the nation.  Is it really so very hard to be honest for Illinois public servants?

Let’s face it, you write an email, once you hit “send”, it’s gone.  You no longer have control over it.  You make public statements, they should be recordable as news.

What the Illinois legislature doesn’t get about that, I don’t understand.

The public has to be allowed to record in courtrooms and with the police.  The police are not special, but non-recording makes them special–and vulnerable to charges of corruption.

JoAnne

Time to declare ABA model rule 8.2 unconsitutional!

From the attorney blogs:

http://disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com/2014/02/commentary-to-model-rule-limiting.html

http://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/litigationnews/top_stories/100512-sanctions-free-speech.html

http://work2bdone.com/live/

Lawyers are beginning to report on their blogs that ABA Model Rule 8.2 saying a lawyer cannot:

Rule 8.2: Judicial & Legal Officials

Maintaining The Integrity Of The Profession
Rule 8.2 Judicial And Legal Officials

(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.

Is now only being used to silence lawyers that are reporting on corruption in the court system, and in particular, probate.

From the blogs, it is widely reported that the rule was simply “thought up” by the ABA, it has never been passed by any state legislature, federal legislature, and there were no public discussions, legislative history or studies of any kind–and especially those that would look at the chilled speech it created, or what effect it might have at all on the First Amendment.

In other words, it was promulgated in a vacuum, has never been properly studied, and it certainly does not comply with the precepts enumerated in Alvarez, Citizens United and any of the very far reaching recent First Amendment cases that SCOTUS has now mandated as law of the land.

Lawyers are starting to widely and publicly complain all the rule is being used by is miscreants for their own personal felonious nests and featherbedding–something the rule was never intended to do.

The ABA took down about 1/3 of the blog it ran on my 3 year suspension, and has not responded to my direct communication to them, even tho it sent me an auto responder it would.

I also don’t see the comments back up.

What sort of an organization is the ABA and just whom is it protecting from what?

ABA model rule 8.2 needs to be put out with the trash in light of Alvarez, Citizens United, Snyder, and others that take a very broad view that the public can say just about anything, and even lie, and it’s a constitutional right.  Everything written today is so easily verifiable and researchable on the internet, what possible benefit can there be for limiting free speech?

What protections do lawyers and judges need anyway?  Is it even possible to malign the reputation of an Illinois politician, esp. when so many are in the clink at the present time?

It is even possible to insult a judge or lawyer, other than in their own egotistical minds?

This blog told the story that the Emperor had no clothes and continues to have no clothes.

The ARDC then clings to the optical illusion of clothes in a desperate attempt to justify that fact that there exist dozens of valid consumer complaints of a very serious variety against certain favored attorneys on the 18th floor (Sykes, Cooper, Wyman, Bedin, etc.) that it flatly refuses to investigate, and even worse, they send out nonsensical letters of response worthy of the literary skills of those addle minded by some serious mind altering substances.

Rule 8.2 is then used as a sword to chill free speech–a rule the people never passed, the state legislature never passed, and a rule which most of the Illinois public would claim unfairly protects Illinois judges and lawyers–a group that for certain needs no special protections.

Lawyers have constitutional rights and we don’t leave them at the door.  Honest lawyers don’t want or need a code of silence to protect miscreants.  Honest lawyers don’t go after other honest lawyers.

Mr. Steven Splitt has now been replaced as litigation counsel on my 3 year suspension as opposing counsel for the Review Board.

My message to him today is loud and clear:  you are violating my constitutional rights with a “rule” that was never studied, never passed by any legislator, and was implemented without public discussion.  It is now only being used as an excuse by the ARDC to cover up serious issues that it refused to investigate on behalf of the public, leaving dozens of lawyer victims in its wake.

This needs to stop.

Mr. Splitt, you now need to figure out your own karma, your own ethics and morals.

If I were you, I would just quit rather than prosecute an honest attorney.  You can come work with and for me. There may not be much money, but you can start to heal the karmic damage done the ARDC to the likes of Sykes, Bedin, Gore, Tyler, Drabik/Richards and others who have suffered years of horrors on the 18th floor and in other Illinois court rooms.

Or not.  Your karma is only your business, but those experienced in karma, will tell you that the longer to wait to fix your karma, the more of a b**** she will be when you get there. And there is absolutely no avoiding Ms. Karma–she will hunt you and track you down to the ends of the earth and back again.  There is no where to hide from her.

Please join with me in demanding that the ARDC rescind Rule 8.2 so it can start doing it’s job of actually reading the blogs, hauling in miscreant attorneys and disciplining them–the job which was its original mission.

I am doing the work for free now.  I serve probate victims for free or low cost.  Mr. Splitt, now you can do the same.

I promise to make room for you.

Sharon Opryszek has turned me down, Leah Black has turned me down, Melissa Smart has turned me down, but you have a new opportunity to walk with the angels and do a whole lot of good in Illinois, publicly one of the top most corrupt states in the US>

joanne

PS–and today I was supposed to give “a statement” to Ms. Opryszek at 1 pm about another case where the lawyer was acting like a total miscreant and ruined the life of my client for months.  I discussed his bar complaint which he so richly deserves and next thing you know, SO is saying I can’t say that.  I withdrew the email and apologized, but now Ms. Opryszek is demanding documents that don’t exist and that I don’t have and insisting that they must be there.  Turns out she has no idea what the definition of “clipboard is”.  she probably thinks it’s an ISIS torture device.  But what was she doing at 1 pm when she was supposed to be doing my statement?  Eating birthday cake.  That’s right.  And the ARDC operators were on the phones telling everyone about how Mr so and so was in a meeting.  Not.  They were all eating birthday cake from 1 to 1:30.  Then Ms. SO rounds the corner, chewing me out for documents I don’t have and I told her so and then she leaves.  Whew.  The song “Happy” was playing when I got into the car so I knew there are no coincidences.  What obnoxious, rude, insulting behavior.  Her attitude clearly was bordering on “if you don’t have it, you better make it up–or else because you’re on my ‘go after’ list.”  She can stuff her ‘go after’ list.  I’m not interested.

Here’s my response to Ms. SO.  No.  I won’t make up your crappy evidence you want, no matter how much you insult and berate me.  I am an attorney and you can’t insult, berate, extort or coerce a good attorney into lying for you.  Not you or good Lord Larkin himself will get me to lie to make your jobs easier, so just lay off.  You might have gotten away with that with poor Ms. Justine McGinty, but I am not a 19 year fresh out of the country girl.  You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

And that other attorney deserves a big hefty bar complaint against him and I’m saying it again.  the judge wouldn’t sanction him,  so I have no idea why you are all getting involved.  You want to hide behind rule 8.2 so I can’t talk honestly to this other attorney, so be it, but I see no reason to give credence to a rule that was made up without any studies, information or evidence it does any good other than to harass honest attorneys.

JoAnne

From Ken Ditkowsky — when due process, the US and State constitutions become “mere technicalities” to be swept away by errant courts

One of the major problems that the friends and family of the designated victims of elder abuse is frustration and the fact that law enforcement moves so slowly.     The adage:  “Justice delayed is Justice denied” is a truism.     How much time does a 90 year old victim have?     If rescued after in the later stages of elder exploitation and abuse what life does this victim enjoy?
The reason that the scam of elder cleansing is so successful is that time is an enemy – not a friend.    When a criminal guardian (usually a guardian ad litem) tells the Court that the family and friend agitate the victim, and the unthinking (and therefore corrupt jurist) orders supervised visitation a/k/a isolation. The victory of evil over the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State, and the Rule of Law is almost a foregone conclusion.      The simple order entered by a corrupt jurist separates the victim from his, her former life and defeats any reasonable accommodation for any disability that might appropriately be addressed.     For instance, in the Mary Sykes case the simple order of Judge Connors (entered without the required jurisdiction or hearings) removed Mary Sykes from her home, her church, her garden club, her sewing jobs, her mobility (and her vehicle), the companionship of her two elderly sisters, the companionship of her younger daughter, including trips and vacations all over the United States.
For Mary’s liberty was substituted drugs reasonably calculated to turn her into a zombie, day care facilities with little or no stimulation, and the unlimited and involuntary distribution of her estate to the elder cleansers.     Even her pet (dog) was taken from her.    Stimulation (i.e. social intercourse with family and friends who were her companions before she was involuntarily restrained) in the words of Cynthia Farenga – agitated her!    Indeed, had she not been competent she would not have been agitated!    An honest and competent jurist would have recognized that agitation was the expected and predictable reaction that involuntary incarceration in direct opposition to the Core values of America.     The more competent the victim the more agitated they would be expected to become!
The same game plan is reported in just about every one of these elder cleansing cases!      The supervision by the Court appointed miscreants is reasonably calculated to thwart any ADA reasonable accommodation that the elderly or disabled person might accidentally receive!      In Mary’s case separation for the stimulation that the younger daughter provided was a major blow to Mary.     A goggle search of Mary G. Sykes turns up Newspaper articles demonstrating how vital a person she was even at 90.     (She even visited President Clinton!)     Her long term relationship with her sisters was terminated by the void order of Judge Connors doing both sisters severe harm.     As Peter Schmiedel pointed out “ Mary is making wonderful progress!”
When one judge after another refused to address the violations of law that are obvious to everyone time and time again not only is Justice denied, but a serious ISIS type assault on the Bill of Rights is promulgated and carried out.     Even though 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 (b) reminds the legal eagles of the very very  limited jurisdiction that is provided a guardian as the legislature recognizes the guardianship has infringing on Civil Rights not only is the mandate “reasonable accommodation) ignored, but,  total usurpation of Human, Civil, Liberty, and Property rights removed.
 In Mary Sykes case the Jurisdictional criteria were all sweep aside as technicalities!      For instance, 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 sets out each criterion.     It states in detail (including how the printing is to long) as to a summons.     The Circuit Court clerk did not bother to print a summons meeting the criterion prior to Mr. Larkin and the IARDC jumping in to aid and abet the criminal conduct.      The Sheriff wrote that he had no record of service of summons so it really did not matter what, if anything, or whether Mary was served with Summons – she was designed to be a victim and as the Court intended to act illegally and contrary to the Constitution – indeed, one fraud on the court more or less did not matter to the elder cleansers and those who acted with them to obstruct justice.  (NB – so that no one forgets – pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I report Mr. Larkin’s felony to the Department of Justice as he acted in concert with the miscreants.  18 USCA 371.    18 USCA 1341, 18 USCA 242)
In a similar manner 11a – 10 requires the close or near relatives to be served 14 days prior to a hearing on Mary’s competency with notice of the aforesaid hearing.     As the miscreants had no intention of allowing such a hearing there was no need to serve the jurisdictional 14 days prior notice.     It thus was ignored!    As Judge Connors pointed out – the same result would have been had whether or not the law was followed!     The need to elder cleanse Mary trumped the Rule of Law.     It should be noted that the three guardians and their attorney admitted that Mary’s two sisters were not disclosed in the Petition for Mary’ to be railroaded into  guardianship and were not notified of any hearing – as no hearing was held so as to determine 1) whether Mary was incompetent and 2) the extent of any infirmity notification.    The corrupt Court signed an order appointing a guardian.
It should be noted that family came to the Court house believing that a hearing was to be held on Mary’s Petition for a Protective order (based upon domestic violence of the Petitioner seeking to be appointed guardian ).     It has been reported that the two guardian ad litem and the attorney for the petitioner just prepared an order appointing a plenary guardian and the presiding judge just rubber stamped it.      Any attack on this extra-judicial procedure was meet with threats of sanctions, Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission sanctions – such as suspensions and disbarment!      This was no idle threat.     Kangaroo Commissions were available to demonstrate that Justice in Illinois was what Jerome Larkin said it was!     The United States Constitution, the Illinois Constitution, the Rule of Law and Justice were merely technicalities.     So confident were the conspirators (18 USCA 371) that they decreed that Mary’s younger daughter was bi-polar because she protested the felonies being committed openly and notoriously.
Of course it should be noted as late as December 29, 2014 another of the probate judges when faced with the ADA claim of the younger daughter as to a disability the younger daughter (Gloria) was at the urging of the very people who claimed prior that she was disabled objected to a reasonable accommodation.    GAL Adam Stern authored the order denying the relief that Ms. Sykes requested!     Mr. Larkin’s cadre of aiders and abettors have been  placed of record  –   senior attorney for the IARDC wrote that Adam Stern had been appointed as Guardian ad litem for the younger daughter and therefore the Commission could not engage in an investigation of the ‘elder cleansing’ that was reported. [1]      These miscreants are paid with public funds!
The record in the case of Mary Sykes 09 P 4585 (Circuit Court of Cook County) verifies the statements that I and others have made concerning this abortion of Justice.      Mr. Larkin by suspending my law license for four years and threatening JoAnne Denison with suspension for three years ****  thought that he could intimidate us and eliminate us from standing up to his comrades prosecuting the War against the elderly and the disabled.       Every day we and others are recruiting citizens to man the barricades and resist the American holocaust directed against the elderly and the disabled.     We will continue this quest until Mr. Larkin and his comrades assaulting the elderly and the disabled are brought to Justice and an elderly or disabled person can enjoy the fruits of America citizenship!
Recruitment of legal talent is not easy for the victims of elder cleansing and their families.   Lawyers are intimidated by Larkin and do not want to sacrifice their law licenses for 90 year old victims of elder cleansing.     Lawyer reason that the elderly will die soon anyway!     It too bad!   But why must I place myself on the line and risk losing my ticket to practice Law.     Indeed, such thought is justified.   Do you see the American Civil Liberties Union leading the fight against this horrendous demonstration of disrespect for Liberty?     Do you see the Media decrying the assault on America?     Do you see the Sheriff of Cook County ordering the arrests of jurists who in the presence of his deputies act well beyond their authority and approve of the harvesting the gold from the teeth of an elderly guardianized victim.  Most people have grown up with the caveat – “do not volunteer!”         Health care fraud has a surcharge of 300% and thus the miscreants are flush and have money to distract the cause of Justice and the Rule of Law.     Thus, most victims lie in their own urine in ‘extended care’ facilities doped to the gills as their hard earned savings and assets are redistributed amongst the guardians and those allied with them.    Law enforcement is aware that it has the burden of proof of “beyond a reasonable doubt” so it painstakingly gathers the evidence that crimes have been committed as the victim go to their final rewards!
The families of victims are desperate!     Mary Sykes is not going to live forever!     The plenary guardian is now so bold as to openly exhibit the redistribution of Mary’s estate by sporting expensive jewelry!     The younger daughter has filed judicial proceedings pro se.     Finding a lawyer to represent her is slightly less difficult than obtaining a Motel reservation on the moon for New Year’s 2015.
What can the victims do!    What can their families do?     The desperation manifests itself in rehabilitating action that makes the advocate appear as a ‘kook!’       This conduct accelerates and ultimately eliminates the advocate from all sympathy of his/her peers*****      The miscreants glory in the spectacle.     Any chance of accomplishing the rescue of a ‘loved one’ entrapped by the cottage industry of elder cleansing is lost irrevocably.      Others join groups that profess to be fighting for Freedom of Speech, Civil Rights, etc.     Some of the groups actually are engaged in such activities; however, there appear in some prolific individuals who are using these groups as cover from racial cleansing, religious cleaning and conduct inconsistent with the core values of America.     Thus, indiscriminate associations also claim casualties that obstruct the cause of justice.
Since I have undertaken this fight as a full time matter I‘ve seen many fine people engaged in the defense of America’s core principles not only in the elder cleansing fight but in the outrage against the ISIS assaults on the Bill Rights self-destruct.     I’ve also seen individuals arise who are not interested in Justice but are interested in using the group to promulgate a parochial bias, malady, etc.     I had to block several individuals who advocate that certain religions and races are the root of all evil.   You name the evil and they will name the religious or racial group that they decree responsible.       Hate sells easily and these individuals are persistent marketers.      They and the elder cleansing miscreants share disrespect for Justice and Honor.
Guilt by association is alive and well in America.       Many of us still believe that “birds of a feather flock together.”    Many of us do not see the color “gray!”      We see only “justice” and “injustice.”       In addressing criminal conduct on the part of corrupt judicial officials and corrupt public officials the concept of “any port in a storm” is not appropriate.        “Hurt feelings” is a luxury that is unavailable.     For the bulk of the friends of the elderly and the disabled we are limited to that HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation.  We have to rely upon law enforcement – even if it takes a long time!      I’ve placed my faith in the Justice Department and Senator Kirk.      I’ve done this because I recognize my limitations and that it appears in Illinois that the ‘ fix is in!’      I learned a long time ago that when the ‘fix’ is in you have to ride it out – Benjamin Franklin’s picture on a treasury note is much more persuasive than “little old me!” [2]
The miscreants are looking for any excuse that they can muster to continue on their very lucrative quests.        Being able to discredit us is a winning strategy.       Our cause is just.      We however are imperfect and impatient and like our children we have been trained to want instant gratification.     It is not going to happen.      The pernicious public officials engaging in the cottage industry of elder cleansing are entrenched and flush with the live savings of their victims.      I’ve been reminded many times that Eric Holder (AG) many times has demonstrated that he is a fighter for Justice and a standup guy.    He is reported to have prosecuted Representative Daniel Rostenkowski, the speaker of the House of Representatives for stealing postage.      He and his successor are our hope that we can save some of the elderly and the disabled who are in dire straits.
Victories are fleeting, defeats are forever.     We need a victory.       The Honest intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation that Jerome Larkin of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission so vigorously opposes would be a first step victory!     Tax enforcement and seeing the miscreants pay the Federal Income taxes that they owe would be a first step victory!

[1] 17 days later after the younger daughter threatened suit the outrageous prevarication became a ‘typo.’   
[2] As I indicated previously bribes no longer are regularly paid in cash.    Corruption is not only the payment of money.    Yes, it usually boils down to a pecuniary gain – however, corruption also includes accepting (or placing) an individual in a position for which he/she is unqualified.     A judge who does not read the statute that she is administrating is corrupt!    A lawyer who ignores the Constitutional mandates is corrupt.   A lawyer who refuses to recognize ADA is corrupt.*****

From Ken Ditkowsky — his view on assults against the ADA and the 18th floor of the Daley Center

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 30, 2014 6:46 AM
To: Eric Holder , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Matt Senator Kirk , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , BILL DITKOWSKY , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Janet Phelan , Ginny Johnson , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Cook County States Attorney , Barbara Stone , Bev Cooper , FOX News Network LLC , Diane Nash , Scott Evans , Fiduciary Watch , “Y. ACLU” , Illinois ARDC , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Harry Heckert , Glenda Martinez , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , The Wall Street Journal , Sam Sugar , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , Eric Blair , “JoAnne M. Denison” , RosANNa Miller , “Jim (” , Alyece Russell , Martin Kozak , Len Holland , Elaine Renoire , Candice Schwager , Tom Fields , Martha Jantho , Rudy Bush , Nancy Vallone , Kathie Bakken , Robert Sarhan , Wsj Lts , “Truthbetoldradio (” , John Howard Wyman , Jay Goldman
Cc: “adacoordinator@illinoiscourts.gov” , Mary Richards , Doug Franks , ACLU of Illinois , “information@iardc.org” , “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” , “ABAJournal.com”
Subject: Americans With Disabilities Act – and the Illinois credo – “do not confuse me with the facts, I’ve made up my mind” erstanding that Judge Evans, the Chief Justice of the Circuit Court of Cook County made a special effort to require the Court system to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.    The Justice Department made in very clear to the Indiana Court system that ADA had meaning a harassment of disabled people (including those who were blind and deaf) were entitled to reasonable accommodation.

Ms. Denison reports today on how a Judge in the Circuit Court of Cook County treated a woman who has a recognized disability.    

**** see post ****

The hostility that is constantly reported by the elder cleansing victims and their families does cease for moment.    The corrupt judicial officials (like Judge M) are as open and notorious as Jerome Larkin and the IARDC in their bias and vendetta against the elderly and the disabled who have been slated for extinction of Civil and Human rights.     Court watchers have reported ex–parte communications between the legal parasites, and corrupt judicial officials.  (Of course the IARDC and apparently the judicial inquiry board do nothing about these communications – censorship and the “exceptions” to First Amendment, and the interpretations of the Canons of Ethics for lawyers apply only to apply to reporting criminal activity involving the Courts.    Operation Greylord was totally unethical in the world of the Cook County, Illinois courts and the IARDC  – however, they very wisely choose to ignore their version of ethics rather than attempt to suspend or disbar the Attorney General of the United States even when he convicted more than a score of judges and forced several score of judges into early retirement.

Now that Ms. Denison has made the events of December 29, 2014 public, let’s see if the court reporter’s notes disappear.    That was the ‘old way’ of dealing with sticky wickets!    Mr. Larkin and the IARDC are bolder – a few words left out of a transcript and a word or two changed accomplishes the same purpose.   (As the Court reporter records the sounds uttered in the courtroom this gambit is dangerous as the changes can be ascertainained.  It leaves a nasty trail.  HOWEVER when pushed by a victim of this wrongful conduct to disclose the recording  it either disappeared, was stolen, lost etc.  We need the Justice Department to obtain the naked recording of not only this proceeding but the questioned misreporting of Judge Stuart’s testimony in the Denison hearings. 

If the law applies to a merchant it certainly applies to the government and particularly the Justice System.    It is time for the law to be enforced and for the Illinois Justice System (and every other State justice System) to comply with the law.   Law is not “do what I say, not what I do!”     Equal protection of the Law is a core value of America!  


 
Ken Ditkowsky
And I would think the investigation of the above court room dramas where Judge M argued forcibly the ADA did not apply to her, grilled a disabled woman, threw out a dog that barked once or twice, ought to be a priority of Chief Judge Evans where the courts are under scrutiny for violations of the ADA (see past posts from the US DOJ emphasizing equal access to the courts and enforcement of the ADA to provide full public access to courtrooms, that translators should be paid for by the courts and that the ADA means seniors should not be marginalized into institutions), should be receiving top priority.
The fact that a sitting judge made fun of myself and Mr. Evans as court room watchers and note takers is also troubling.  Our democratic courtrooms only thrive on being open and transparent.  I have yet to be allowed to use my laptop to blog in 1804.  It always turns into a such a hassle and often detracts from the proceeding when reporting should be seamless.

Can a trained service dog bark under the ADA? Judge Aicha MacCarthy answers the question today, and a whole lot more

Dear Readers;

As you know, there is fairly not much more entertaining than the Sykes case, ARDC decision or not withstanding that this blog is now the MOST DANGEROUS BLOG IN ILLINOIS–and it’s for reporting on the Sykes case.

So, let’s state the facts ma’am and only the facts of what happened to day in court.

1) Gloria files an ADA pleading, and no, I don’t have it yet, but I will get it, I promise.  The essence of the complaint is a) Mary Sykes has rights under the ADA and she is being discriminated against in that b) she is isolated from 20+ former friends and neighbors, including her beloved younger daughter Gloria; c) she can’t live where she wants, which is with Gloria; and d) Gloria’s POA was summarily suspended without notice or hearing, etc.  That’s the gist I got from Gloria today who braved 1804 again, this time with the very formidable Judge M.

2)  We all show up at 10 am, and I would bring out my laptop but I get harassed from the court, AS and PS, and I figure, the ADA is going to be a real kicker out the door today, they’ll hear it first, MOTION DENIED, and I’m outta there.  No reason to fight over the laptop, so I grab some order forms and prepare to take 2 notes:  Gloria steps up, MOTION DENIED.  ADA?  are you kidding on the 18th floor?  What a loser.  Okay, I’m the legal  pessimist today.

3)  Neither Carolyn nor Mary shows up.  No surprise there.

4) AS and PS show up–eventually.  But here’s the weird part.  Judge M keeps on going back and forth from bench to back door, about 3 or 4 times from 10 am to 11 am.  Interesting.  PS is here, but apparently wandering.  AS is waiting, for Godoh, I’m sure.

5)  Finally after about an hour the case is called.  Curiously, Judge M seemed to know where PS was and what he was up to even tho it was not disclosed in open court.  Gloria has been wandering in and out and say PS walked to the back hall and disappears.  Okay, I would put 2 and 2 together, but that takes work.  The ARDC says stuff like that never happens, and Lord Larkin has ruled those are actually 18th floor optical illusions and that’s that.  No more stating the obvious.  Let the reader figure that out.

6)  Right away, the argument ensues between Gloria and Judge M.  It takes on a rather personal, nasty tone for some strange reason.  Judge M declares “no dog and this is my courtroom.”  Gloria retorts with the ADA and the dog is not a service dog like one for the blind or deaf, but a working dog and it is covered under the ADA.  Gloria repeats firmly 1)  I have a disability; 2) the dog mitigates my disability.  Judge M says you have to also assert training.  Gloria:  no I don’t.  Judge M: yes you do.  Gloria:  fine, he’s trained.  Judge M:  Get him out of here.  I already ruled and issued a court order and you’re openly defying me.  Gloria’s friends comply and dog leaves.

So much for that.  I’ve really never seen a judge or any court employee challenge a disabled person and grill them, but hey, this is cook county court, right?  We have judges that jail court room observers for pants too low. Got it. Those weenie disableds with all those problems better get their act together and put together a cohesive legal argument and get it done–or else!

Gloria then argues her motion and her ADA claim about her mother and Judge M just says MOTION DENIED.  Finally.  What I came for. There’s no ADA on the 18th floor, not with all those sick people who need to be billed by attys and gotten rid of, right?

You’d think it was the end, but oh, no, there are more points to be made.

A dog bark is heard.  Judge M flies into a flury over how service dogs don’t bark.  Gloria says Shaggy is a working dog and sometimes, yes, they do bark.  I have to agree with that, even tho I don’t have the immediate authority of Google or Wiki, and I’m a reporter at this point, so I have no need to get involved in all that.

But Gloria argues the dog barking point, the working dog point and Judge M kicks Gloria out.  In fact, Judge is fairly rude and condescending to Gloria, like usu., making faces, laughing at times, probate victims know the rigamarole. So do I.  Yawn.

Gloria leaves.

Here’s the weird part.  Judge M then stands up, arms a flying and points at me and yells “And Mrs. Denison, you can go ahead and write down whatever you want in your notes!”  (in a sarcastic condescending tone) (Since when do court watchers get a comment from the judge???  Interesting)  I leave.  I am mostly puzzled and not at all bothered by the comment other than it didn’t seem appropriate from a sitting circuit judge.

Scott reports later that she then turned to him and yelled at him from the bench sarcastically “Mr. Evans, and you too can write down whatever you want to!”

After I leave get in the hall, Gloria bursts into tears.  I comfort and tell her to leave with Shaggy ASAP.  I trust no one, absolutely no one on that floor.

Shaggy gives a few barks on the way out and I guess that was the cue for Judge M to come a flying off the bench, arms waving about the dog that’s never supposed to bark.

But even with all that, Gloria and Shaggy have already made the turn to the elevators.  They are safe.  My work is done.  Gloria would have gone back on the anteroom work bench in silver bracelets and Shaggy down to the pound for assisted involuntary suicide.

Scott says he heard she wanted to put Gloria in contempt again and arrest her (for a barking working dog).

So I close with this article

http://dogcare.dailypuppy.com/can-service-dogs-bark-1135.html

and I suggest Judge M get a 4G wireless table with google to try to keep up on these things.

But we then made it to Starbucks!  Yeah, Starbucks.

But then a guy in a sheriff’s white shirt and a gun walked up to Gloria and said “lady, is this your dog, you ain’t blind or nothing, he has to leave.”

Groan.

One of our party that shall be kept nameless simply said, “officer, are you trained in the ADA?”  “Well, actually, no I’m not.”  “But you’re a deputy, right, with over 200 hours of training, right?”  “Okay.”  “Maybe you ought to think about getting some ADA training before you talk to this young lady about her dog, okay?”  “Okay.”

He left to give directions to a kid.  Good idea.  He’s trained in getting that kid to the State of Illinois building in the pedway.  Good choice.

JoAnne

More on the US DOJ and the ADA and keeping seniors out of institutions:

Click to access doj_hhs_letter.pdf

What a nice holiday present from the US DOJ that recognizes the importance of keeping seniors out of institutions that do not want to be there and that the ADA IS in fact meant to accomplish that goal.

So far, it has been my experience in the Illinois court system they are basically ignoring the ADA when it comes to putting a senior in a nursing home versus his own home (Frake).  Chemical restraints are common to accomplish those goals, even though illegal (Wyman, etc.)

Let’s hope the US DOJ can put out more guidelines and help seniors use the ADA to stay in their homes, avoid chemical restraints, and have freedom to choose their POA and caretaker (Thomas, Sykes) without interference from the state.

JoAnne

An open letter to the ABA on removing supportive commentary on the article regarding the ARDC’s (flawed) decision

Dear ABA Journal Editors:

As someone who runs my own legal blog, I am extremely disappointed by your recent actions, which I believe represent unethical journalism in that you removed about 1/3 of the comments in support that my 3 year suspension by the Illinois ARDC was extremely suspect and wrongful.

Ninety five percent of the entire Sykes family and friends have come to my aide, and continues to come to my aide in supporting my assertions that I have told the truth on my blog, I continue to tell the truth on my blog, and it is the Ill. ARDC that continues to discipline those that report miscreant behavior and strings of felonies against the innocent elderly and their families via the guise of “probate court” and “guardianships” that turn out to be very far from protecting a elderly person–instead they victimize and abuse the elder.  The Ill. ARDC currently prosecutes the journalist lawyer, and not the perpetrators of these grave and serious crimes against our nation’s elders.

The truth in probate across the nation is ugly.  Elders are targeted by hospitals, nursing homes, visiting nurses – and even attorneys, for paid up homes and cars and wealthy elders and then they are railroaded into guardianships (Sykes, Bedin, Wyman, etc.) without jurisdiction, their homes and cars are sold, often at great discounts (in Sykes, the home was appraised for $700k and was sold a couple months later for $238k), and while the attorneys say in court “it’s for the care of the Ward”, often 90% of the fees (or more) go to the attorneys! (Wyman, Sykes, Stone, Martinez/Smith) These seniors are forcibly put into nursing homes where they are isolated (Sykes, Wyman, Stone, etc.) from 90% of former friends and family.  In an incredulous letter from Ms. Stone, a Rabbi was told he could not visit because the daughter asked him to!  I’m not sure if that’s guilt by association or collective punishment, but it’s all wrong and another form of elder abuse.

So many, many victims of this abusive system have come to read and support my blog, that in a very short period of time, I have garnered 70,000 views and the discussions are lively and timely.

I do NOT remove comments from my blogs unless they are spam.  I publish both sides.  And I have to tell you 99% of the feed back is positive of my blog and very supportive.

I would like to remind you of the rules of ethics for journalists:

“Seek Truth and Report It

Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.

Journalists should:

    – Take responsibility for the accuracy of their work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original sources whenever possible.

    – Remember that neither speed nor format excuses inaccuracy.

    – Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story.

    – Gather, update and correct information throughout the life of a news story.

    – Be cautious when making promises, but keep the promises they make.

    – Identify sources clearly. The public is entitled to as much information as possible to judge the reliability and motivations of sources.

    – Consider sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Reserve anonymity for sources who may face danger, retribution or other harm, and have information that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Explain why anonymity was granted.

    – Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing.

    – Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public.

    – Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

    – Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.

    – Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all.

    – Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate.

    – Boldly tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience. Seek sources whose voices we seldom hear.

    – Avoid stereotyping. Journalists should examine the ways their values and experiences may shape their reporting.

    – Label advocacy and commentary.

    – Never deliberately distort facts or context, including visual information. Clearly label illustrations and re-enactments.

    – Never plagiarize. Always attribute.

From the Society of Professionals Journalists, http://www.SPJ.com

I do not believe that you have followed some of the above rules, and your removal of comments with facts clearly in support of what I have been doing violates those ethics.  It presents a one sided commentary and reaction to your story.

 In addition, your own “rules of commentary” state as follows

“But there are also limits to that debate. Don’t use profanity or resort to name-calling, threats or personal attacks. Don’t spam the site with advertising. And don’t masquerade as someone you’re not. We reserve the right to delete comments that are inappropriate and block users who consistently violate our policies.

By posting a comment on this site, you are agreeing to follow the ABA’s Code of Conduct and allow the ABA Journal to reprint your comment in all forms of media at any time.

If you believe a commenter has violated our rules or if you spot an error in a post, please let us know.”

By removing the comments, it appears that the posters (who support my cause) have engaged in name-calling, threats or personal attacks, or have spammed the site or they are someone they are not.

I have never removed a comment from my blog.  I might respond with my own commentary, but my blog is open and honest and transparent.  I published the facts.

You published an article without even a scintilla of research from other lawyers involved, the family and friends of Mary Sykes, and you didn’t even look at the pleadings and the record on appeal with respect to Mary’s case.  It’s right on my blog.  In addition, you didn’t even review the court file or records. You just published what the ARDC did and you did no investigation of the fact yourself, even though they are all on the blog.

You should read the briefs and the pleadings that Ken Ditkowsky and I have filed in numerous cases against the miscreants.

You will then find that the Sykes case 09 P 4585 was a sham, Mary’s home appraised in one month for $700k and then was sold a couple months later for $238k because “it was for the care of Mary” but the attorneys involve have asked for and obtained at least $150k in attorneys fees, if not more.  The younger daughter, Gloria, held a valid POA for health care that was summarily invalidated by the court without notice or hearings, or any findings–in derogation of Illinois law, and there is no evidence of service upon Mary Sykes, either in the court file or the Sheriff’s department.  In fact, Sheriff Dart even wrote Ken Ditkowsky a letter that no evidence of service can be found!

The entire case is just about the nadir of the legal profession, and then the ABA goes and abuses the Sykes family all over again by removing positive commentary from the public, friends and family of Mary Sykes that the case contained dozens of procedure defects rubber stamped by judges (Conners and Stuart).  Stuart suddenly retired after lying at my ARDC trial.  You want a good investigative story, here’s a few:

1) Ask Jerome Larkin why he and the attorneys do not Ethics Report yearly, even though this is required by the Illinois Ethics Act of 2009.  (NB – JL may claim the ARDC is not a state agency, but in the cases Mr. Ditkowsky and I filed against the ARDC they responded they have immunity as a state agency.  Go figure).

2) Ask JL why he has large mortgage payoffs on his home, Melissa Smart’s $250k condo was paid off and others at the ARDC have had their mortgages paid.  Ask them who is paying those large sums directly to the banks of the attorneys involved.

3) Ask JL why they do not report staff salaries at the ARDC as other state agencies all do.

4) Go and see the videos of Mary G Sykes at http://www.vimeo.com as see how Mary Sykes clearly displays high cognitive brain function during the months surrounding her guardianization, causing one Cook County Judge to proclaim to Gloria, “Oh, my goodness, this woman is clearly competent.”  He had been a probate judge for a long time and was familiar with who was competent and who was not.

5) Go and look at the “Table of Torts” on my blog, http://www.marygsykes.com for more egregious errors and the railroading of Mary G Sykes, and when you are done with that, I have at least a dozen more cases.

And the public wants to know why and how this is happening.

Please put back the comments that “someone in power didn’t like” and show that you are not a corrupt organization.

I would also appreciate an apology for 1) making the comments one sided and 2) your reporter’s failure to conduct an appropriate investigation by reading the blog and the evidence presented on the blog.

If your reporters cannot or will not take the time to fairly, honestly and reasonably conduct an investigation, they should not be reporting on what the Illinois ARDC does.

My blog tells the truth and only the truth.  I publish all the records and all the pleadings, including the Record on Appeal for Sykes.

I would suggest you either withdraw the story, or conduct a proper investigation and tell the truth, starting with, who and why asked that you remove much of the commentary from your blog on Monday morning.  Was it someone from the Illinois ARDC?  Was it Jerome Larkin?

JoAnne Denison

From Ken Ditkowsky–consider the tax consequences

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 26, 2014 12:29 PM
To: ginny johnson , Barbara Stone
Cc: RosANNa Miller , Glenda Martinez , “joanne@justice4every1.com” , “kev_pizz@hotmail.com” , “tozzolyles@gmail.com” , Robert Sarhan , Doug Franks , Patty Reid , Tim Lahrman , “ken@ditkowskylawoffice.com” , Janet Phelan , Theresa Pizzarello , “iviewit@iviewit.tv” , Angela Woodhull , Sam Sugar , Skender Hoti , Mark Adams , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , “abc.news.magazines@abc.com” , “thisweek@abc.com” , “virginia.moseley@abc.com” , “adam.walser@wfts.com” , Ana Beciana , “barbara.hollingsworth@cjonline.com” , “beltway@foxnews.com” , FOX News Network LLC , “negerp@abc.com” , “neroplace@yahoo.com” , “news12wc@news12.com” , “news12ct@news12.com” , “news12nj@news12.com” , “news@netmio.com” , “news@kshb.com” , “newspath@cbs.com” , “newsrm@woodtv.com” , “newswatch@foxnews.com” , “news@whec.com” , “newsletter@mail.observer.com” , “ontherecord@foxnews.com” , “penny.britell@abc.com” , “reutersnews@msnbc.com” , “scoop@huffingtonpost.com” , “exopolitics@exopolitics.com” , “toastedpecan523@gmail.com” , “themost@msnbc.com” , “dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com” , “nytimes@e.newyorktimesinfo.com” , “newyorklawjournal@alm.com” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , “mikehuckabee@mikehuckabee.com” , Peter Schmiedel Carolyn’s 2nd attorney , Adamm Stern GAL , Cynthia GAL
Subject: Re: predators have to pay US Income taxes

Tax consequences of Elder Cleansing
Al Capone was brought down not by convictions for the crimes that he committed as an ‘outfit boss’ but for not paying the taxes due on his criminal enterprises.    As the history of Operation Greylord revealed the forces of law and order meet extreme resistance from the political establishment and codes of silence imposed by corrupt judicial entities who correctly pointed out that if you punished the jurists and their associates for their crimes you would undermine the justice system.    Fortunately, courage prevailed and over a score of judges became guests of the Department of Justice.
One again Illinois is faced with corrupt judicial officials and once again the self-policing system has failed.     The Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission has become venal in its ‘cover up’ of corruption and has actually assaulted the core values of American democracy.     Jerome Larkin has actually been noted to have acted in concert with criminal elements amongst the 2nd oldest profession in direct defiance of 18 USCA 371.     The miscreant elements have openly and notoriously railroaded one or more disabled persons into guardianships wherein the aforesaid senior citizens could be isolated from their prior lives, be stripped of their humanity, and liberty, and have their estates looted.   For illustration purposes the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 (Circuit Court of Cook County) is addressed [1] as an illustration.      Most if not all of the ‘elder cleansing’ guardianship cases bear the same deficiencies including those cases originating in States other than Illinois.
The following jury instruction explains that the act of one conspirator is the act of all, to wit:
If these defendants, or any two or more of them, conspired together, with or not with any other person or persons, to excite the people or classes of the people of this city to sedition, tumult and riot, to use deadly weapons against and take the lives of other persons, as a means to carry their designs and purposes into effect, and in pursuance of such conspiracy, and in furtherance of its objects, any of the persons so conspiring, publicly, by print or speech, advised or encouraged the commission of murder, without designating time, place or occasion at which it should be done, and in pursuance of, and induced by such advice or encouragement, murder was committed, then all of such  conspirators   are guilty of such murder, whether the person who perpetrated such murder can be identified or not. If such murder was committed in pursuance of such advice or encouragement, and was induced thereby, it does not matter what change, if any, in the order or condition  of society, or what, if any, advantage to themselves or others, the  conspirators   proposed as the result of their conspiracy; nor does it matter whether such advice and encouragement had been frequent and long-continued or not, except in determining whether the perpetrator was or was not acting in pursuance of such advice or encouragement, and was or was not induced thereby to commit the murder. If there was such conspiracy as in this instruction is recited, such advice or encouragement was given, and murder committed in pursuance of and induced thereby, then all such  conspirators   are guilty of murder. Nor does it matter, if there was such a conspiracy, how impracticable or impossible of success its end and aims were, nor how foolish nor ill-arranged were the plans for its execution, except as bearing upon the question whether there was or was not such conspiracy. 
SPIES v. PEOPLE, 122 Ill. 1, 100, 12 N.E. 865, 914, 1887 Ill. LEXIS 969, 115-116 (Ill. 1887)
On the Civil Side the Illinois courts have ruled that:
the theory of jurisdiction based on the acts of a co[] conspirator   must be that co[] conspirators   are each other’s agents; thus[,] the argument would be that when a  conspirator   commits a tortious  act within Illinois[,] he does so as agent for his co- conspirators , who thereby also become subject to this [s]tate’s jurisdiction.”  Green, 86 Ill. 2d at 440-41, 427 N.E.2d at 1208.

Ploense v. Electrolux Home Prods., 377 Ill. App. 3d 1091, 1105, 882 N.E.2d 653, 666, 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 1401, 30, 317 Ill. Dec. 773, 786 (Ill. App. Ct. 4th Dist. 2007)
Herein in the Sykes case, therefor the actions Farenga are the acts of Larkin and the other conspirators.     18 USCA 371 is just one of the statutes that affirms this matter.
As fiduciaries even the corrupt judicial officials in guardianship cases and their appointees owe the ward the highest degree of responsibility.    It is an axiom that a fiduciary cannot profit from his relationship with the ward except for legitimate compensation for work done was intended to reasonably benefit the ward’s estate and then only to the extent that the charges for the work are reasonable and the work was indeed necessary to the estate.
The court held that embezzled money constituted gross  income   of the embezzler in the year in which the funds were misappropriated under 26 U.S.C.S. § 22(a) and § 61(a). Both lawful and unlawful gains were comprehended within the term “gross  income .” Congress intended to tax  income   both from both legal and illegal sources to remove the incongruity of having gains of the honest laborer taxed and the gains of dishonest immune. Further, the language of 26 U.S.C.S. § 22(a) and of § 61(a) encompassed all accession to wealth clearly realized and over which a taxpayer had complete dominion.  
James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 213, 81 S. Ct. 1052, 1052, 6 L. Ed. 2d 246, 250, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2014, 1, 61-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9449, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1361, 1961-2 C.B. 9 (U.S. 1961)
Thus, the breaches of fiduciary relationship by the corrupt judicial officials, the corrupt appointees and all who act in concert with them create taxable income and United States Income taxes must be paid in the year in which the particular breach of the fiduciary relationship occurs.
Thus, when a guardian enters the safety deposit box of his /her ward, removes approximately a million dollars in gold coins the guardian creates a taxable event for herself and all who have acted in concert with her.   This includes the guardian ad litem who without knowledge as to what if anything was in the safety deposit box denies that the gold coins were in the safety deposit box.    This includes the attorneys who join arms to prevent public disclosure of the theft including the public official (Jerome Larkin) who attempts to intimidate whistleblowers and retaliates 42 USCA 12203 because of the disclosure of ADA violations.
The foregoing is pretty basic.     If you aid and abet or steal money from a ward if you are a fiduciary you have Federal Income taxes to pay on the proceeds of the theft.    (When you return the money you may get a deduction for the return – however, the statute of limitations is three years.)        We do not have to discuss compensation awarded by the Court – it is clearly taxable when paid [2] .
The question that presents itself arises from the unique nature of the Fiduciary relationship.     No one ever put a gun to the fiduciaries head and required the guardian and those who act in concert with the guardian to serve.      The position of guardian was sought quite aggressively by the individual who was appointed.     This individual knew or should have known that he/she was undertaking a serious position in which substantial expertise is required and absolute honesty and honor demanded.         The guardian and the corrupt judicial officials were well aware that:
No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.”  Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford,  141 U.S. 250, 251, 35 L. Ed. 734, 737, 11 S. Ct. 1000, 1001 (1891)   V.H. v. K.E.J. (In re Estate of K.E.J.), 382 Ill. App. 3d 401, 412, 887 N.E.2d 704, 715-716, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 357, 22-23, 320 Ill. Dec. 560, 571-572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2008)
guardians are to apply a substituted judgment standard, where they attempt to discern what the  ward would have wished if she were competent, and then substitute that judgment for their own. See,  e.g., In re Estate of Greenspan,  137 Ill. 2d 1, 558 N.E.2d 1194, 146 Ill. Dec. 860 (1990)
V.H. v. K.E.J. (In re Estate of K.E.J.), 382 Ill. App. 3d 401, 418, 887 N.E.2d 704, 720, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 357, 35, 320 Ill. Dec. 560, 576 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2008)
The fiduciary (all three guardians in the Sykes case) were aware that the statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 mandated that the guardianship could only address the infirmities, if any, that the disabled person had.   Thus, to know the extent and nature of the guardian’s authority the Court and the guardians each had to know what, if any, infirmity existed at the time of the appointment.   Thus, to have a guardian appointed the Court had to hold a hearing and make specific findings as to 1) that a disability exists, 2) what the disability was, 3) the extent and nature of the disability and 4) what, if any, reasonable accommodation was required to address the disability so that the ward could enjoy the fruits of American civilization.     Without such a finding based upon competent evidence that met the standard of clear and convincing the appointment of a guardian for the ward was and is an invitation to disaster!     In point of fact having no direction that guardian could not make appropriate decisions and ip so facto could not serve.
As a protection for the ward from being railroaded into a guardianship the  Court was required to obtain  jurisdiction over the person of the ward  by the full and complete compliance with 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 (in Illinois).     Anything short of full compliance did not vest the Court with jurisdiction.     Half price methods of obtaining jurisdiction were and are assaults on the Civil Rights and Human Rights of the alleged disabled person.     As the record in Sykes demonstrates virtually no compliance with the statutory requirements a serious problem exists.   Ex post facto vesting of jurisdiction is a per se fraud.   Jurisdiction is not a technicality!       Without jurisdiction the guardian and the court cannot make any decisions and every dollar of the ward’s estate that is removed is removed without authority and is a theft!!!!    In America strangers cannot access a senior citizen’s bank account and remove the senior’s funds to pay for items that the stranger believes must be spent.      If one wants to be Good Samaritan he/she has to do it on their own expense.
 However, jurisdiction aside the grant of authority is limited by the Constitution of the United States and the State to only those areas of life in which it is necessary to invade to provide the disabled person with the reasonable accommodation of the disability.     In other words – as Mary Sykes had been successfully and appropriate managing her money no guardian was necessary to address those issues.    The fact that Mary recognized the theft of $4000 from her checking account and the fact that a 90 year old woman was no eligible for an IRA account is clear proof that the guardianship was inappropriate as ordered.    The applicant for guardian must prove the extent and nature of the incompetency by clear and convincing evidence.
When coupled with the fact that Mary Sykes today knows the objects her bounty, it is submitted that the guardianship imposed was illegal and a ‘taking’ in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.      Examining the facts of the Mary Sykes case further there was never any hearing to determine the extent of Mary Sykes’ disability, if any.    Thus to reiterate,  as the proof of incompetency and the extent thereof has to be proven in Illinois by clear and convincing evidence prior to an adjudication the guardianship was illegal and the expenditure of funds of any kind and nature un=necessary and wrongful.
Theft is a taxable event [3] .     It therefore follows that when the guardian transfers the ward out of her home and isolates her so as to separate her from her human rights and civil rights any dime that is used from the ward’s estate is taxable income to the fiduciary de facto guardian.     Similarly every dime of the ward’s funds use is taxable and must be reported on the 1040 tax return of the de facto guardian and his/her co-conspirators.
The doctrine of Constructive receipt is also applicable.       By this I mean, Mary Sykes had over a million dollars of assets that were taken from her by this guardianship.      Is 100% of those assets taxable in the year in which the illegal guardianship is established?      There is an argument for such an approach; however, it fall down when dealing with tangible property.    For instance, Mary owned some real estate.     By false pleadings a judge whose honesty has been questioned entered inappropriate orders allowing for the real estate to be sold at a fraction of its value.     (This property had been previously appraised at $700,000 and the sale price was pegged at less than $250,000).       There is no question that the entire $700,000 is ordinary income at the point of sale in a legitimate guardianship as the guardian is well aware that his nominee sales fool everyone but the Department of the Treasury.     The question however is whether upon receipt of the property the taxable event occurs.
It is my analysis that constructive receipt would apply only to fungible property such as cash, collectibles etc.     The tangible property that is titled in the name of the ward are still owned by the ward until removed from his/her name.
In Summary it is my opinion that the illegal guardianship when initiated is per se a breach of fiduciary relationship and results in immediate ordinary income tax liability for not only the miscreant guardian, but all his/her co-conspirators including the attorneys who are presumed to know that the guardianship for profit (or guardianship for elder cleansing) are illegal and the public officials such as Mr. Jerome Larkin who aid and abet the criminal conduct and who act in concert with the criminals.     This liability encompasses not only the items purloined but all the fungible property that can be converted to cash including but not limited to the funds used solely and specifically for the ward.    (Volunteers who take it upon themselves to impose their will on senior citizens cannot require the aforesaid senior citizens to dissipate their estates at the will and caprice of the aforesaid volunteers who may or may not have a corrupt jurist on retainer).
Like Al Capone’s situation the War on the elderly and the disabled senior citizens may be won by application of the tax code rather than directly prosecuting the corrupt judicial and other officials under the criminal code.     The tax is due when the property is or could have been removed by the fiduciary who has violated his/her duty.    In the Sykes case this is 2009.      There is a fraud penalty of 50% to be applied in every one of these cases, plus interest and general penalties.
Merry Christmas!       It is suggested to the guardians for profit and those who have conspired with them (such as Jerome Larkin) that interest is running as 1040 forms have not been filed disclosing the theft there is no relief from this fraud upon the United States of  America.     The time for filing the appropriate tax reports is now and the time for ending the elder cleansing is now.    The Constitution and the state statutes are designed to protect seniors and the disabled.    The tax laws are designed to tax legal and illegal profits!


[1] Mary Sykes was a 90 year old widow who did her own banking and was active in her garden club, etc.   She discovered that her older daughter removed $4000 from her accounts without permission.  When the daughter was confronted she claimed that she took the money to open an IRA account for Mary.    Mary informed her that she (Mary) was not eligible for an IRA account.    Mary sought an order of protection against the daughter.   The daughter countered with an incompetency petition pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq.  (Guardianship statute).
Question is raised as to whether Mary was served with process.   Certainly the jurisdictional statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 was not complied with as neither of Mary’s two siblings or her younger daughter were notified 14 days in advance of any hearing as to competency was held.     It does not appear that any such hearing was ever held and certainly the required standard of proof was never achieved or the required findings (755 ILCS 5/11 a – 3b) determined.
[2] Compensation to a fiduciary is limited to payment for services that will reasonably benefit the estate of the ward, and can only be awarded to the extent that the said charges represent reasonable and necessary compensation.    For instance.    In the Sykes case Adam Stern made application and received money from the estate to defend an appeal of an order entered by Judge Connors that he and Judge Connors knew was entered without jurisdiction.    That compensation to Stern was wrongful and by law must be returned to the estate.    The appointment of two guardian ad litem in the Sykes case similarly represents wrongful charges against the estate of Mary Sykes.    More seriously it appears that jurisdictional events were ignored by a corrupt judicial official and her appointees and that Mary Sykes may not have been incompetent on day one etc.     Thus, all the money paid by the Estate to the three guardians and their respective attorneys is wrongful dissipation of the estate.     N.B.  Just this month it was learned that Mary Sykes knew the objects of her bounty in spite of years of isolation and drugging.    As Mary was doing her own banking when she was wrongfully abducted into the guardianship so that she could be isolated from her prior life – the entire guardianship is bogus and a sham and every dollar removed by the fiduciaries must be restored to the Estate.     It is suggested therefore that each dollar removed is by definition taxable income jointly and severally to each of the co-conspirators whether the subject of a court order or not.     A court order entered by a corrupt jurist cannot sanitize a fiduciary theft!
[3] Even though the guardian has not been appropriately appointed, the guardian is estopped from claiming that he/she was not appointed property and/or had not assumed a fiduciary role.

From Glenda Martinez–her pleas of help from Senator McCain

Please see below, and if Sen. McCain helps, it for sure will reach the dozens of probate blogs out there and other blogs protecting the elderly and disabled.

This message is regarding Alan Smith, Retired Colonel, US Army Corp Engineers.  He is being held against his will in  a nursing home, with a forced feeding tube when he can eat and chew food, the nursing home won’t take the time.  Wife Glenda desperately wants to take him back home and care for him at home.  He was put in the nursing home because he has a sizeable estate the court wants to attack and drain.  I believe they have done a great job so far.

My heart and prayers go out to you, Glenda.

Dear Senator McCain

I receive your newsletters regularly and have written to you in the past and you have responded.
I imagine this request is close to your heart because it involves a fellow Decorated WAR VETERAN  and his family.  My good friend Glenda and her husband Alan, the Decorated War Veteran is in a situation worse the VA Phoenix situation and his situation is more like a concentration camp

The content below is
1.Introduction
2. A War Veterans Needs including Discrimination and Violations .
3. Validation by advocates of this destructive epidemic across USA.
4. Center for Public Representation articles “Constitutional law, state law, the nature and scope of the legal authority to NOT control with whom an adult can associate.      .
5. In closing In the spirit of the Holidays, Compassion, Entitlement and Equal protection of the law!                         Preserving the Constitution And the Sanctity of Marriage, Family. Community and Life is more important By Ken Ditkowski, Esq
6. List of a few advocates across our Nation who can Validate the depth and breath of the epidemic fraud, theft, deception and destruction of our constitution, family and lives for self profit and self dealing .

We need your assistance to correct this horrific illegal attack at the very fiber of our Constitution, Bill of rights
Civil rights, Community, Family, Life and Morality as human beings.

I am forwarding Glenda plea for help and also Our friend, Ken Ditkowsky, Esq
pleas and emails
I know you won’t forsake them

Nancy Vallone
RN BSN MSN CNS
5017 Winchcomb Dr.
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
Nvallone1@gmail.com
330-979-1398

Glenda
May I have permission to send this email regarding
The Discrimination and Violation of All Rights, equal protection under the law and report the neglect  and abuse on all levels to organizations and individuals that SHOULD take responsibility and assist you and Allen
Yes Glenda, you are correct –
This is beyond unacceptable Criminal Behavior
And
Yes this is Torture for both of you
And
Yes this is occurring to many of our friends across the nation
And yes some of our friends and loved one have DIED in  identical situation
And
Yes this is more devastating and destructive than the Phoenix VA outpatient clinics Fraud
I live in Phoenix  have been to the Phoenix VA system and also a dependent in the military system
NLV

From:
Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>, “Nancy
If you or anyone have any suggestions AS WHAT CAN BE DONE PLEASE HELP
Lord have Mercy!!!!!
IS THIS THE WAY OUR DECORATED  WAR VETERANS ARE TO LiVE Their last days on earth
To Die Alone in a cold and uncaring nursing home.At the hands of CRIMINALS, PERPETRATORS and THIEVES????
This is one of the several pictures sent to me    Alan, my dear husband is neglected and left alone for hours and shifts and none of his hygiene protocol are taking place in this nursing home
Alan does not receive any cognitive stimulation. No cognitive activities,
No physical therapy. No speech therapy which are direly needed by Alan’s condition and standards of care .
Alan is left alone to languish in bed and probably develop bed sores, infection and die a premature death
His only pleasure (eating his food) was taken away and put on a PEG force feed tube into his stomach!!!
Alan is beet red which is  either his blood sugar or his blood pressure soaring out of control
Three days have passed and  The paid private aide is gone ??
Alan suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury, and needs continuous treatment but nothing is being done for months now, just let to suffer !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,
so Alan can die quickly and they can plunder all that is left in the Estate !!!!!
I have become completely sick to my stomach and the knot and pain wont go away!!
Nancy, you and Ken Esq., Joanne, Esq., Marti, Tom Fields, Roseanne , Beverly Newman EdD and others know how epidemic and destructive these people are across the country First Hand
They are
criminals and thieves,the”nursing homes & attorney” ”
They make a fortune living off the vulnerable and disabled
-the  young Developmental Disabled like your niece Danielle Mutphy
-VETERAN like my husband Alan
– ELDERLY like your mothers and fathers SHAME ON THEM!!!!!!!
This is TORTURE.
I asked for the Catholic Priest to visit with Alan two days ago, they would NOT even let the Catholic Priest in to visit ALAN either!!!  Unconscionable
How and why is this System allowed to get away with violating  Rights with fraudulent orders
Everyone who want to visit Alan is barred from seeing him??
To hide their criminal acts, the neglect, abuse and fraud
Even the Police are NOT allowed to do a WELFARE Check.
What stupid authority does this ABUSIVE CRIMINAL PERPETRATOR guardian have to manipulate the entire system including the nursing home director and staff, into not letting anyone in and my husband die alone ?
Alan doesn’t need a guardian What is Wrong with our Country
I am praying Alan doesn’t die over the holidays, its his birthday and our anniversary next week.
I love Alan with all my heart,
He is the most caring, brilliant and lovable person.
Everyone who meets him is always impressed at his good nature and pleasant attitude!
This is a CRIME,
THOSE CRIMINALS  CRAMER &MORRIS, NEED TO BE STOPPED from destroying
LIVES and FAMILIES  Please Help
GM
I only wish Senator McCain and others would listen and help Alan before its too late! Yesterday was Alan’s birthday, I took his gift, cards and flowers and sent them up with one of Alan’s past nursing aides, but  they would not let him go up to see how Alan was,  nor take him the gifts even! They say the guardian does not want anyone to see Alan, unless they are on his list (the list probably has only himself and the sociopath attorney of his! They are not only physically harming Alan, but also emotionally, at not even permitting someone to come and wish him a happy birthday.  The abuse is intolerable for Alan and worse for me, I became so upset,  got a migraine I’ve had all day, and my blood pressure went flying up.  This is emotionally killing me!  Today I spent part of the day calling agencies reporting the abuse, and I wish there had been more hours of the day to report it to some other ones. The kind retired judge Raab suggested  I was to go in person to the Elder Abuse Agency on Friday and speak with the manager there (if he can be found) and then put the judge on the line to speak with him also.   He says “this whole scenario stinks, something fishy going on here”! He wants to help Alan. And thank you to all that also have tried helping us during the last few days, you have been of great  The problem is that the abusive nursing home in our case, doesn’t care who or how they are harming the victim, emotionally nor physically.   They could care less as long as they can continue helping themselves to as much money each month as can —-presenting fraudulent billings and statements  for  “services provided” to the ward, which should actually read,  “services provided for actively abusing and  neglecting, so to slowly murder the ward” , and doing this by chemically restraining, taking all food and water away from victim,  and  sticking a  force fed tube into Alan’s stomach because no one has the time to help feed him.  They are predatory, deviant,  Sociopath! feeds on inflicting as much pain as can to Alan and me, and who knows to how many other of his “ward” they are doing this to!  As Ken states definitely needs to be honest and thorough independent audit and investigated
GMS
Center for Public Representation article
“legal authority to control with whom an adult ward can associate?”

http://www.centerforpublicrep.org/images/stories/docs/Q%26A-grdn-authority-friends-Sept-200
The answer will be informed by an analysis of Constitutional law, state law, the nature and scope of the guardianship order, the age of the ward, as well as his/her ability to express clear preferences. State constitutions, statutes and regulations must be part of any analysis of this question. Some states’ “mental health patients'” rights statutes, for example, Massachusetts, recognize the fundamental nature and the right of association and do not permit its restriction for any individual, unless there is a compelling clinical justification.An individual’s ability to spend time with and be in relationship with whomever he/she chooses springs from the Constitutional right to free association. Arguably, no state civil court order of any type can interfere with an individual’s right to exercise his/her constitutional rights. However, there are numerous state law guardianship cases that appear to do just that.One of the most frequently litigated issues is whether a guardian has the authority to initiate divorce proceedings on behalf of a ward. The Illinois Supreme Court has recognized a strong majority rule that, absent statutory authorization, a guardian cannot maintain an action, on behalf of a ward, for the dissolution of a ward’s marriage. In re Marriage of Drews, 115 Ill.2d 201, 503 N.E.2d 339, 104 Ill.Dec. 782 (Sup. Ct. Ill. 1986), rehearing denied, Jan. 30, 1987. The Court, however, held that annulment of a marriage was within the authority of the guardian under state law. Presumably, this power is based on the premise that the ward does not have the legal authority to enter a contract. See also Wood v. Beard, 107 So.2d 198, 200 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1958); Phillips v. Phillips, 203 Ga. 106, 108-09, 112, 45 S.E.2d 621, 622, 624 (1947); State ex rel. Quear v. Madison Circuit Court , 229 Ind. 503, 504-05, 99 N.E.2d 254, 255 (1951); Mohler v. Shank’s Estate, 93 Iowa 273, 277-79, 61 N.W. 981, 983 (1895); Birdzell v. Birdzell, 33 Kan. 433, 435-36, 6 P. 561, 561-62 (1885); Johnson v. Johnson, 294 Ky. 77, 78, 170 S.W.2d 889, 889-90 (1943); Stevens v. Stevens, 266 Mich. 446, 254 N.W. 162 (1934); Higginbotham v. Higginbotham, 146 S.W.2d 856, 857 (Mo.Ct.App.1940); In re Jennings, 187 N.J.Super. 55, 58-59, 453 A.2d 572, 574 (1981); Mohrmann v. Kob, 291 N.Y. 181, 189-90, 51 N.E.2d 921, 924-25 (1943); Freeman v. Freeman, 34 N.C.App. 301, 302-03, 237 S.E.2d 857, 858(1977); Hart v. Hart, 705 S.W.2d 332(Tex.Ct.App.1986); cf. Campbell v. Campbell, 242 Ala. 141, 142, 5 So.2d 401, 401-02 (1941) (stating the general rule but finding statutory authorization); Cohn v. Carlisle, 310 Mass. 126, 128, 37 N.E.2d 260, 262 (1941) (finding statutory authorization); Kuta v. Kuta, 154 Neb. 263, 264-66, 47 N.W.2d 558, 559 (1951) (finding statutory authorization)The parens patriae authority of the state to impose guardianship on individuals determined not to be competent carries with it all of the trappings of best interest.  However, Courts often couple the best interest standard with that of the individual’s expressed preference. One guardianship case taking many twists and turns over a seven year period involved a lesbian who had experienced a head injury in an automobile accident and whose family, although initially a co-guardian with her lover, moved for exclusive guardianship and the right to prohibit any contact between their daughter and her lover. The modification of the guardianship and the restriction on contact was originally permitted by the trial court and the Minnesota Court of Appeals, based on a finding that it was in the ward’s best interest and she was incapable of expressing a preference. Ultimately, the woman’s lover obtained guardianship based on a subsequent determination by the Minnesota Court of Appeals that it was both the ward’s preference and also in her best interest. In re Guardianship of Kowalski, 382 N.W.2d 861 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986), 392 N.W.2d 310, (Minn. Ct. App. 1986), and 478 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). See also In the Matter of the Guardianship of Miller, 1988 WL 106662, (Ohio App. 4 Dist.) (visitation of a stroke victim by previous common-law husband was not in the ward’s best interest and was consistent with the ward’s preference); In the Matter of M.R., 628 A.2d 1274 (NJ 1994) (overruling trial court’s order placing adult ward with mother when ward had expressed preference to live with father). However, the best interest standard is alive and at times is the only consideration in making a determination regarding association. In the Matter of Abbott, 1995 WL 419968 (Del. Ch.) (court applied best interest standard exclusively in determining whether to permit visitation and imposing limitations on frequency).There is a growing recognition in case law that guardianship should be narrowly tailored and that the least restrictive approach should be adopted when limiting an individual’s control over his/her life. In the Matter of Guardianship of Braaten, 502 N.W.2d 512 (Sup Ct. N.D., 1993), a case brought by the North Dakota P&A, the parents and guardians of an adult woman with mild mental retardation sought to restrict her smoking and to keep her from a boyfriend they believed to be abusive. The case challenged the broad general guardianship order that had been entered by the trial court as there was only evidence of incompetence regarding medical treatment decisions. The Court found that this  guardianship was not the least restrictive and that the guardianship order should be narrowed to only encompass medical decisions. See also, In the Matter of the Guardianship of Hedin v. Gonzales, 528 N.W.2d 567 (Sup. Ct. Iowa 1995); In re the Matter of Boyer, 636 P.2d. 1085 (Sup. Ct. Iowa, 1981).There is no simple answer as to whether a guardian can limit a ward’s association. This question is even more complicated for children. To minimize the likelihood of these possible conflicts, P&As should be vigilant in their efforts to defend against unnecessary guardianships or to have guardianships that may be appropriate to be as narrowly tailored as possible.

Have a nice Christmas Nancy and All.
I know all I want for Christmas is for all our abused, neglected and isolated loved ones to come home!
God Bless
Glenda and Alan

On Dec 22,2014, at 9:00 AM,
kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:
It would  be nice if in the Christmas Season if anyone could demonstrate some compassion and Christmas spirit.  Mrs. Martinez is not asking for anything other than that which she and her husband are entitled – Equal protection of the law!
I do not understand why this is so difficult as we do live in America.  Yes I know it is not politically correct to mention Christmas, Christ, God, Mercy, Honor, Justice or similar words as some no account ****** hypothetical individual might be offended,
kenneth ditkowsky esq
<kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
More Important to consider is
Preserving the Constitution
And the Sanctity of Marriage, Family. Community and Life
Restore and return the family
To what God and our Founding Fathers had intended by sponsoring and signing a declaration to do just that
Partial Solution
NO ONE IS TO Segregate, confine or isolate another human being unless a danger to himself or society.
NO one is to take charge of another person estate unless is granted by the person and family’s
Immediately , the rights will return to the families under the terms of our Constitution, inalienable rights , human Rights and civil rights as intended

From: Nancy Vallone <nvallone1@gmail.com>
December 22, 2014
kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>Cc: Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>, ”
Other advocates
<joanne@denisonlaw.com>,

From Ken Ditkowsky–why is the govt not collecting taxes on fraud in guardianships

To: Nancy Vallone <nvallone1@gmail.com>, Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>, “joanne@justice4every1.com” <joanne@justice4every1.com>
Cc: Tim NASGA <timlahrman@aol.com>, Probate Sharks <verenusl@gmail.com>, Nasga Us <nasga.org@gmail.com>, “J. Ditkowsky” <jdit@aol.com>, Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, Matt Senator Kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>, “FBI- ( (” <civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>, Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>, BILL DITKOWSKY <drditkowsky@aol.com>, Chicago Tribune <tips@tribune.com>, SUNTIMES <letters@suntimes.com>, Janet Phelan <janet_c_phelan@yahoo.com>, Ginny Johnson <ginny.johnsoncheeserings@gmail.com>, “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” <ada.complaintadmin@usdoj.gov>, Barbara Stone <bstone12@hotmail.com>, Bev Cooper <bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com>, Cook County States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>, FOX News Network LLC <foxnews_7d7b711af105dca690ab56169c0ff242@newsletters.foxnews.com>, Diane Nash <sa3456@msn.com>, Scott Evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>, Illinois ARDC <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>, Fiduciary Watch <fiduciarywatch@gmail.com>, “Y. ACLU” <aclu@aclu.org>, ISBA Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>, Edward Carter <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>, Cook Sheriff <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>, “tips@cbschicago.com” <tips@cbschicago.com>, “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” <loamu@aol.com>, Sam Sugar <ssugarmd@msn.com>, The Wall Street Journal <support@wsj.com>, Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik <zamirkatan@aol.com>, Eric Blair <activistpost@gmail.com>, “JoAnne M. Denison” <joanne@denisonlaw.com>, RosANNa Miller <prov2828@hotmail.com>, “Jim (” <jimdit@earthlink.net>, Alyece Russell <llessura@gmail.com>, Martin Kozak <kozakm1@gmail.com>, Len Holland <consult4lj@yahoo.com>, Elaine Renoire <elaine@abusiveguardianships.com>, Candice Schwager <schwagerlawfirm@live.com>, Tom Fields <tvfields@oh.rr.com>, Martha Jantho <utterby@sbcglobal.net>, Rudy Bush <wmrcls@hotmail.com>, Kathie Bakken <k_bakken@att.net>, GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com>, Wsj Lts <wsj.lts@wsj.com>, Robert Sarhan <drrob2007@yahoo.com>, John Howard Wyman <johnhowardwyman@gmail.com>, “Truthbetoldradio (” <truthbetoldradio@gmail.com>, Jay Goldman <jnjgldmn@aol.com>, Janet Phelan <writejanet@live.com>, Mary Richards <maryrichards45@gmail.com>, Doug Franks <info@deepfriedbrownies.com>, ACLU of Illinois <acluofillinois@aclu-il.org>, “information@iardc.org” <information@iardc.org>, “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” <illinoislawyernow@isba.org>, Greg Coleman <gcoleman@bclclaw.com>, “ABAJournal.com” <webmaster@abajournal.com>, Marty Prehn <mprehn2004@yahoo.com>
Subject: Miscreant guardians and those who aid and abet them are liable for U S Income taxes – why are these taxes not being collected?
Date: Dec 26, 2014 12:27 PM
Tax consequences of Elder Cleansing
Al Capone was brought down not by convictions for the crimes that he committed as an ‘outfit boss’ but for not paying the taxes due on his criminal enterprises.    As the history of Operation Greylord revealed the forces of law and order meet extreme resistance from the political establishment and codes of silence imposed by corrupt judicial entities who correctly pointed out that if you punished the jurists and their associates for their crimes you would undermine the justice system.    Fortunately, courage prevailed and over a score of judges became guests of the Department of Justice.
One again Illinois is faced with corrupt judicial officials and once again the self-policing system has failed.     The Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission has become venal in its ‘cover up’ of corruption and has actually assaulted the core values of American democracy.     Jerome Larkin has actually been noted to have acted in concert with criminal elements amongst the 2nd oldest profession in direct defiance of 18 USCA 371.     The miscreant elements have openly and notoriously railroaded one or more disabled persons into guardianships wherein the aforesaid senior citizens could be isolated from their prior lives, be stripped of their humanity, and liberty, and have their estates looted.   For illustration purposes the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 (Circuit Court of Cook County) is addressed [1] as an illustration.      Most if not all of the ‘elder cleansing’ guardianship cases bear the same deficiencies including those cases originating in States other than Illinois.
The following jury instruction explains that the act of one conspirator is the act of all, to wit:
If these defendants, or any two or more of them, conspired together, with or not with any other person or persons, to excite the people or classes of the people of this city to sedition, tumult and riot, to use deadly weapons against and take the lives of other persons, as a means to carry their designs and purposes into effect, and in pursuance of such conspiracy, and in furtherance of its objects, any of the persons so conspiring, publicly, by print or speech, advised or encouraged the commission of murder, without designating time, place or occasion at which it should be done, and in pursuance of, and induced by such advice or encouragement, murder was committed, then all of such  conspirators   are guilty of such murder, whether the person who perpetrated such murder can be identified or not. If such murder was committed in pursuance of such advice or encouragement, and was induced thereby, it does not matter what change, if any, in the order or condition  of society, or what, if any, advantage to themselves or others, the  conspirators   proposed as the result of their conspiracy; nor does it matter whether such advice and encouragement had been frequent and long-continued or not, except in determining whether the perpetrator was or was not acting in pursuance of such advice or encouragement, and was or was not induced thereby to commit the murder. If there was such conspiracy as in this instruction is recited, such advice or encouragement was given, and murder committed in pursuance of and induced thereby, then all such  conspirators   are guilty of murder. Nor does it matter, if there was such a conspiracy, how impracticable or impossible of success its end and aims were, nor how foolish nor ill-arranged were the plans for its execution, except as bearing upon the question whether there was or was not such conspiracy.
SPIES v. PEOPLE, 122 Ill. 1, 100, 12 N.E. 865, 914, 1887 Ill. LEXIS 969, 115-116 (Ill. 1887)
On the Civil Side the Illinois courts have ruled that:
the theory of jurisdiction based on the acts of a co[] conspirator   must be that co[] conspirators   are each other’s agents; thus[,] the argument would be that when a  conspirator   commits a tortious  act within Illinois[,] he does so as agent for his co- conspirators , who thereby also become subject to this [s]tate’s jurisdiction.”  Green, 86 Ill. 2d at 440-41, 427 N.E.2d at 1208.

Ploense v. Electrolux Home Prods., 377 Ill. App. 3d 1091, 1105, 882 N.E.2d 653, 666, 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 1401, 30, 317 Ill. Dec. 773, 786 (Ill. App. Ct. 4th Dist. 2007)

Herein in the Sykes case, therefor the actions Farenga are the acts of Larkin and the other conspirators.     18 USCA 371 is just one of the statutes that affirms this matter.
As fiduciaries even the corrupt judicial officials in guardianship cases and their appointees owe the ward the highest degree of responsibility.    It is an axiom that a fiduciary cannot profit from his relationship with the ward except for legitimate compensation for work done was intended to reasonably benefit the ward’s estate and then only to the extent that the charges for the work are reasonable and the work was indeed necessary to the estate.
The court held that embezzled money constituted gross  income   of the embezzler in the year in which the funds were misappropriated under 26 U.S.C.S. § 22(a) and § 61(a). Both lawful and unlawful gains were comprehended within the term “gross  income .” Congress intended to tax  income   both from both legal and illegal sources to remove the incongruity of having gains of the honest laborer taxed and the gains of dishonest immune. Further, the language of 26 U.S.C.S. § 22(a) and of § 61(a) encompassed all accession to wealth clearly realized and over which a taxpayer had complete dominion.
James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 213, 81 S. Ct. 1052, 1052, 6 L. Ed. 2d 246, 250, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2014, 1, 61-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9449, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1361, 1961-2 C.B. 9 (U.S. 1961)
Thus, the breaches of fiduciary relationship by the corrupt judicial officials, the corrupt appointees and all who act in concert with them create taxable income and United States Income taxes must be paid in the year in which the particular breach of the fiduciary relationship occurs.
Thus, when a guardian enters the safety deposit box of his /her ward, removes approximately a million dollars in gold coins the guardian creates a taxable event for herself and all who have acted in concert with her.   This includes the guardian ad litem who without knowledge as to what if anything was in the safety deposit box denies that the gold coins were in the safety deposit box.    This includes the attorneys who join arms to prevent public disclosure of the theft including the public official (Jerome Larkin) who attempts to intimidate whistleblowers and retaliates 42 USCA 12203 because of the disclosure of ADA violations.
The foregoing is pretty basic.     If you aid and abet or steal money from a ward if you are a fiduciary you have Federal Income taxes to pay on the proceeds of the theft.    (When you return the money you may get a deduction for the return – however, the statute of limitations is three years.)        We do not have to discuss compensation awarded by the Court – it is clearly taxable when paid [2].
The question that presents itself arises from the unique nature of the Fiduciary relationship.     No one ever put a gun to the fiduciaries head and required the guardian and those who act in concert with the guardian to serve.      The position of guardian was sought quite aggressively by the individual who was appointed.     This individual knew or should have known that he/she was undertaking a serious position in which substantial expertise is required and absolute honesty and honor demanded.         The guardian and the corrupt judicial officials were well aware that:
No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.”  Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford,  141 U.S. 250, 251, 35 L. Ed. 734, 737, 11 S. Ct. 1000, 1001 (1891)   V.H. v. K.E.J. (In re Estate of K.E.J.), 382 Ill. App. 3d 401, 412, 887 N.E.2d 704, 715-716, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 357, 22-23, 320 Ill. Dec. 560, 571-572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2008)
guardians are to apply a substituted judgment standard, where they attempt to discern what the  ward would have wished if she were competent, and then substitute that judgment for their own. See,  e.g., In re Estate of Greenspan,  137 Ill. 2d 1, 558 N.E.2d 1194, 146 Ill. Dec. 860 (1990)
V.H. v. K.E.J. (In re Estate of K.E.J.), 382 Ill. App. 3d 401, 418, 887 N.E.2d 704, 720, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 357, 35, 320 Ill. Dec. 560, 576 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2008)
The fiduciary (all three guardians in the Sykes case) were aware that the statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 mandated that the guardianship could only address the infirmities, if any, that the disabled person had.   Thus, to know the extent and nature of the guardian’s authority the Court and the guardians each had to know what, if any, infirmity existed at the time of the appointment.   Thus, to have a guardian appointed the Court had to hold a hearing and make specific findings as to 1) that a disability exists, 2) what the disability was, 3) the extent and nature of the disability and 4) what, if any, reasonable accommodation was required to address the disability so that the ward could enjoy the fruits of American civilization.     Without such a finding based upon competent evidence that met the standard of clear and convincing the appointment of a guardian for the ward was and is an invitation to disaster!     In point of fact having no direction that guardian could not make appropriate decisions and ip so facto could not serve.
As a protection for the ward from being railroaded into a guardianship the  Court was required to obtain  jurisdiction over the person of the ward  by the full and complete compliance with 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 (in Illinois).     Anything short of full compliance did not vest the Court with jurisdiction.     Half price methods of obtaining jurisdiction were and are assaults on the Civil Rights and Human Rights of the alleged disabled person.     As the record in Sykes demonstrates virtually no compliance with the statutory requirements a serious problem exists.   Ex post facto vesting of jurisdiction is a per se fraud.   Jurisdiction is not a technicality!       Without jurisdiction the guardian and the court cannot make any decisions and every dollar of the ward’s estate that is removed is removed without authority and is a theft!!!!    In America strangers cannot access a senior citizen’s bank account and remove the senior’s funds to pay for items that the stranger believes must be spent.      If one wants to be Good Samaritan he/she has to do it on their own expense.
 However, jurisdiction aside the grant of authority is limited by the Constitution of the United States and the State to only those areas of life in which it is necessary to invade to provide the disabled person with the reasonable accommodation of the disability.     In other words – as Mary Sykes had been successfully and appropriate managing her money no guardian was necessary to address those issues.    The fact that Mary recognized the theft of $4000 from her checking account and the fact that a 90 year old woman was no eligible for an IRA account is clear proof that the guardianship was inappropriate as ordered.    The applicant for guardian must prove the extent and nature of the incompetency by clear and convincing evidence.
When coupled with the fact that Mary Sykes today knows the objects her bounty, it is submitted that the guardianship imposed was illegal and a ‘taking’ in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.      Examining the facts of the Mary Sykes case further there was never any hearing to determine the extent of Mary Sykes’ disability, if any.    Thus to reiterate,  as the proof of incompetency and the extent thereof has to be proven in Illinois by clear and convincing evidence prior to an adjudication the guardianship was illegal and the expenditure of funds of any kind and nature un=necessary and wrongful.
Theft is a taxable event [3].     It therefore follows that when the guardian transfers the ward out of her home and isolates her so as to separate her from her human rights and civil rights any dime that is used from the ward’s estate is taxable income to the fiduciary de facto guardian.     Similarly every dime of the ward’s funds use is taxable and must be reported on the 1040 tax return of the de facto guardian and his/her co-conspirators.
The doctrine of Constructive receipt is also applicable.       By this I mean, Mary Sykes had over a million dollars of assets that were taken from her by this guardianship.      Is 100% of those assets taxable in the year in which the illegal guardianship is established?      There is an argument for such an approach; however, it fall down when dealing with tangible property.    For instance, Mary owned some real estate.     By false pleadings a judge whose honesty has been questioned entered inappropriate orders allowing for the real estate to be sold at a fraction of its value.     (This property had been previously appraised at $700,000 and the sale price was pegged at less than $250,000).       There is no question that the entire $700,000 is ordinary income at the point of sale in a legitimate guardianship as the guardian is well aware that his nominee sales fool everyone but the Department of the Treasury.     The question however is whether upon receipt of the property the taxable event occurs.
It is my analysis that constructive receipt would apply only to fungible property such as cash, collectibles etc.     The tangible property that is titled in the name of the ward are still owned by the ward until removed from his/her name.
In Summary it is my opinion that the illegal guardianship when initiated is per se a breach of fiduciary relationship and results in immediate ordinary income tax liability for not only the miscreant guardian, but all his/her co-conspirators including the attorneys who are presumed to know that the guardianship for profit (or guardianship for elder cleansing) are illegal and the public officials such as Mr. Jerome Larkin who aid and abet the criminal conduct and who act in concert with the criminals.     This liability encompasses not only the items purloined but all the fungible property that can be converted to cash including but not limited to the funds used solely and specifically for the ward.    (Volunteers who take it upon themselves to impose their will on senior citizens cannot require the aforesaid senior citizens to dissipate their estates at the will and caprice of the aforesaid volunteers who may or may not have a corrupt jurist on retainer).
Like Al Capone’s situation the War on the elderly and the disabled senior citizens may be won by application of the tax code rather than directly prosecuting the corrupt judicial and other officials under the criminal code.     The tax is due when the property is or could have been removed by the fiduciary who has violated his/her duty.    In the Sykes case this is 2009.      There is a fraud penalty of 50% to be applied in every one of these cases, plus interest and general penalties.
Merry Christmas!       It is suggested to the guardians for profit and those who have conspired with them (such as Jerome Larkin) that interest is running as 1040 forms have not been filed disclosing the theft there is no relief from this fraud upon the United States of  America.     The time for filing the appropriate tax reports is now and the time for ending the elder cleansing is now.    The Constitution and the state statutes are designed to protect seniors and the disabled.    The tax laws are designed to tax legal and illegal profits!

[1] Mary Sykes was a 90 year old widow who did her own banking and was active in her garden club, etc.   She discovered that her older daughter removed $4000 from her accounts without permission.  When the daughter was confronted she claimed that she took the money to open an IRA account for Mary.    Mary informed her that she (Mary) was not eligible for an IRA account.    Mary sought an order of protection against the daughter.   The daughter countered with an incompetency petition pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq.  (Guardianship statute).
Question is raised as to whether Mary was served with process.   Certainly the jurisdictional statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 was not complied with as neither of Mary’s two siblings or her younger daughter were notified 14 days in advance of any hearing as to competency was held.     It does not appear that any such hearing was ever held and certainly the required standard of proof was never achieved or the required findings (755 ILCS 5/11 a – 3b) determined.
[2] Compensation to a fiduciary is limited to payment for services that will reasonably benefit the estate of the ward, and can only be awarded to the extent that the said charges represent reasonable and necessary compensation.    For instance.    In the Sykes case Adam Stern made application and received money from the estate to defend an appeal of an order entered by Judge Connors that he and Judge Connors knew was entered without jurisdiction.    That compensation to Stern was wrongful and by law must be returned to the estate.    The appointment of two guardian ad litem in the Sykes case similarly represents wrongful charges against the estate of Mary Sykes.    More seriously it appears that jurisdictional events were ignored by a corrupt judicial official and her appointees and that Mary Sykes may not have been incompetent on day one etc.     Thus, all the money paid by the Estate to the three guardians and their respective attorneys is wrongful dissipation of the estate.     N.B.  Just this month it was learned that Mary Sykes knew the objects of her bounty in spite of years of isolation and drugging.    As Mary was doing her own banking when she was wrongfully abducted into the guardianship so that she could be isolated from her prior life – the entire guardianship is bogus and a sham and every dollar removed by the fiduciaries must be restored to the Estate.     It is suggested therefore that each dollar removed is by definition taxable income jointly and severally to each of the co-conspirators whether the subject of a court order or not.     A court order entered by a corrupt jurist cannot sanitize a fiduciary theft!
[3] Even though the guardian has not been appropriately appointed, the guardian is estopped from claiming that he/she was not appointed property and/or had not assumed a fiduciary role.
Ken Ditkowsky
posted with permission of the author

Barbara Stone publishes massive attorney fees in her mother’s guardianship case with an open letter to the Fla. Bar President Mr. Coleman

Massive unconscionable fee petitions

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwLXdUNU5jR21pVUE&authuser=0:

From Barbara Stone, probate victim

Subject: Holidays and the end of the hostage siege
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 15:43:42 -0500

Thanks Rosanna for the news below – at long last, the bar association finally decided not to tolerate pilaging.
I am copying Greg Coleman, the Florida Bar president who is aiding and abetting Roy Lustig, an elder predator with a Florida Bar law license to terrorize and loot my mother and attempt her death.  Roy Lustig, a elder predator with a Florida Bar license and his cartel of accomplices walked off with about $175,000 of my mother’s money in the last 2 weeks while holding my mother caged, isolated, drugged and in a locked down facility in a feeding tube.  
 
My mother is not in any way benefiting from these acts that violate the Americans with Disabilities Act and Federal and Florida Criminal Statutes.
Their looting sessions occurs on a regular basis and my mother’s assets are almost drained at which time her life will have no value and their murder effort will escalate.  Then my claim against the Florida Bar will  greatly escalate.
 
GREG COLEMAN is an accomplice as I and many others have reported these crimes to him.  In retaliation, he is causing my disbarment and abetting my false arrest for objecting to my mother’s being owned by criminals who are viciously looting her assets and causing her death.   
 
I have included Gloria Sykes email from this morning to this email trail directed to presidents of the bar enterprises that license terrorist to assault elderly defenseless and disabled persons.
 
Roy Lustig is the perfect candidate to disbar as the 3rd DCA has already done their dirty work for them by finding him guilty of fraud on the court and other crimes.  Further, apparently Lustig is involved in other dirty dealings with charities and nursing home “loans”
 
What the heck is it going to take?  How many murders and lootings will Greg Coleman ignore before the Florida Bar starts to comply with their ethics. 
 
It is Christmas today  -my mother is alone, caged, in a feeding tube when she can eat, diapered when she can take care of her functions, drugged to be a non human although she is a delightful person, forcibly removed from her home and being subjected to all kinds of vile acts by this cartel.  
 
How is your holiday going today Mr. Coleman?
 
I think Rosanna, just like Bill Cosby is not indestructible, neither is the Florida Bar or the other bar associations who license these predators.  We have a lot of Florida Bar victims who are coming forward and the media will be out in droves.  The media is getting an understanding that this story is the coupe of the century.  I am fielding calls from reporters who are outraged that attorneys have engineered and assembled a squad to cause our loved one’s death to take their assets and property.  
 
Mr. Coleman, as a token of your intent to cease being a part of these activities and conduct a real investigation, could you insure that I get my mother back next week as I will be so petitioning so that she can regain her life in the new year.
To my beautiful mom, I know the struggle you take on every day because you are holding on with all your might to come home to me.   This terror era is coming to an end and I look forward to giving you a million kisses and hugs and your being safe with your family for the new year.
Barbara

From Ken Ditkowsky–Tim Evans, transparency??? No laptops or cell phones, but television in the court rooms?

Now here’s the strangest anomaly of all.  Presiding Judge of Cook County Tim Evans goes from banning cell phones and cameras and laptops and electronic devices (which are NOT banned in federal court, where the most dangerous criminals are, go figure), but he bans them in the local court system claiming that they are dangerous to victims because gang members take pictures of witnesses to harass or intimidate them?  Who knew?  Of course, he says this and bans the electronics without a scintilla of published evidence, just on his say so.

Now he is apparently going to allow cameras in the courtrooms.

I assume, on cases he selects.

It will be a long and cold day before the cases we really want to hear about–Sykes, Janie Thomas, etc. are recorded for the public’s scrutiny.

JoAnne

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-cameras-courtroom-cook-met-20141216-story.html

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20141222/news/141229736/

From Barbara Stone–stop helping the criminals!

From: Barbara Stone <bstone12@hotmail.com>
Sent: Dec 20, 2014 3:34 PM
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>, Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, Probate Sharks <verenusl@gmail.com>, Tim Lahrman <timlahrman@aol.com>, “joanne@justice4every1.com” <joanne@justice4every1.com>, Nasga Us <nasga.org@gmail.com>, “J. Ditkowsky” <jdit@aol.com>, Matt Senator Kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>, FBI- <civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>, Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>, …
Subject: RE: Urgent – Alan’s Health, Welfare and Life

The attorneys and judges involved in these torture tactics are beyond the garden variety of criminals with a Bar license who steal, embezzle, sabotage and create deranged scenarios to assault and freedom and endanger our loved ones and us.

These attorneys are terrorists with a Bar license with are engaged in warfare tactics against our families.  The judges are mobsters.  

I was  terrorized in a hearing yesterday by the judge and attorney and the adult predators who own my mother.  They embezzled her assets in a mock hearing that did not even pretend to be anything other than lawless.  I was told to be silent and repeatedly threatened with contempt.  I was fearful I would be held in contempt.  The judge refused to provide his oath of office.  I was the victim of terror tactics that are used against criminals.  He brought in his bailiff and the security. These was one of me and about 10 of them. I was removed from the room and not allowed to leave voluntarily.  THESE TACTIC HAVE ESCALLATED BECAUSE WE ARE SILENT AND BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN SWEPT UNDER THE RUG FOR YEARS.

GM, I am traumatized and haunted by what is going on in my matter and yours and the torture of our loved ones.  These acts by judges and attorneys ARE WAR CRIMES, crimes against humanity.

WE MUST PUT TOGETHER A REQUEST FOR INDICTMENTS – we are fighting a war against murderers.   No one will do it for us

 So I have no use for the “balanced” politically correct cordial letters that are being sentThat just empowers them to commit CRIMES.  And it greatly harms those of us who have living relatives as it abets their abuse by CRIMINALS.   

We are dealing with CRIMINALS.  All of them –

So I ask the people who are sending the cordial letters to criminal to stop this conduct of abetting their crimes.  AND GET THEM HAULED OFF TO JAIL.

We need to file formal complaints with the police, DOJ, FBI, etc – each of us need to have our own specific charges.  Ken, I appreciate the letter you provided for charges to be files with DOJ.  It only works if the charges are filed.  I and others have spent the whole day today dealing with the criminal acts of attorneys and will be filing charges.  I will be refining the letter and will be back to everyone asap.

Barbara