From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Oct 1, 2014 10:56 PM
To: “email@example.com” , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “ADACoordinator@IllinoisCourts.gov” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)”
Cc: Probate Sharks , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Nasga Us , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago FBI , Janet Phelan , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , FOX News Network LLC , Bev Cooper , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Fiduciary Watch , Barbara Stone , Edward Carter , Cook Sheriff , Cook County States Attorney , “email@example.com” , The Wall Street Journal , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , 60m Cbs News <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Jim (” , Sam Sugar , Nancy Vallone , Elaine Renoire , Glenda Martinez , Jay Goldman
Subject: Re: this is interesting — ADA page at Illinois Supreme Court
It is quite clear that the Illinois Supreme Court’s offer of accommodation is not in insincere, but is another exercise in futility.
The Supreme Court is fully aware that in these guardianship cases the Courts that it supervises are openly and notoriously violating the mandate of the Illinois Constitution and the ADA. The Illinois Supreme Court is fully aware that in violation of 18 USCA 371 (and 18 USCA 4) is fully aware that Mr. Jerome Larkin and his merry cohorts have been consistently and openly and notoriously ‘covering up’ and ‘aiding and abetting’ the criminal enterprises that have been going on in these cases by corrupt judicial officials and their appointees. The proceedings filed by Larkin against Ms. JoAnne Denison and myself were at best spurious and clearly in retaliation for our joint complaints that the Americans with Disabilities Acts was violated in In re: Sykes 09 P 4585 and the Gore case.
The Supreme Court was very well aware that (and had before it affidavits from interested parties) there never was any compliance with 755 IlCS 5/11a – 1 et seq. and in particular 11a – 10. The Court was also aware that Gloria Sykes was being subjected to numerous ADA violations both in the Circuit Court and by Mr Larkin. Yet like the Gore case in which 90 year old Alice Gore had her 29teeth prospected for gold (and the gold removed) Larkin did nothing to remedy the situation.
In addition the Court was well aware that Larkin was openly retaliating against Ms. Dension and myself for our speaking out against these ADA violations. (For detail see my Petition in the Supreme Court of the United STates 13 -1473.) Larkin’s perfidy is also illustrated in a disciplinary proceeding with a racial nexus against attorney L. Amu. Of course the retaliation continues as the Supreme Court of the United States allows Larkin to continues his discriminatory conduct. This pernicious activity discourages attorneys from representing in an appropriate manner the hundreds of elderly and disabled people who the Americans with Disabilities Act seeks to protect.
Recently the Supreme Court further retaliated against me by fining me a $1000 for something or other on the application of Mr. Larkin. Whatever these proceedings entailed was of course tardy! Not only had 30 days elapsed but I had filed a Petition before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Just for the record – your argument that the Illinois Constitution of 1970 bars guardianship appointments just like it bars the Justice of Peace and the Master in Chancery fiascoes has extreme merit. I’ve copied the ADA (Justice Department) as in any investigation that Justice makes it should address all the violations. (I understand that in a not dissimilar situation an Indiana Supreme Court Justice had to resign)
Where to file an ADA grievance against the Illinois State Courts:
Ken’s grievance he filed: