From Ken Ditkowsky — the letter from Ms. Guzman is fairly amazing. I have to agree!

To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: ardc response Alice R. Gore 8-18-14 -COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Date: Aug 21, 2014 7:58 PM
 
 The letter is indictment of Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman!    When this letter is matched to the July letter of Ms. Guzman falsely claiming that Adam Stern was appointed the GAL for Gloria Sykes it is very clear that Federal Felonies are being promulgated in the office of the IARDC as well as  being covered up.   (It took Guzman 17 days to discover that no one was buying her intentionally false statement concerning Ms. Sykes and thus her prevarication designed to provide cover for not investigating Adam Stern was exposed) 
 
Thus pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I have reported to Federal and State law enforcement the criminal conduct of Larkin and certain attorneys who are paid by the State of Illinois as to:
 
1) aiding abetting numerous felonies committed by judges and court appointed guardians in which senior citizens are robbed of their liberty, property and human rights (see Sykes 09 P 4585)
2) assaults on the Bill of Rights and core values of the United States of America
3) violations of Human Rights.    As Tim has indicated violations of Americans with Disability act and as demonstrated by Ms. Guzman’s letter to the Coopers – violations of human rights and the law of civilization.    Imagine a public body and an attorney paid a substantial salary by citizens of Illinois attempting to condone lawyers and judges ganging up on a 90 year of widow to mine her mouth for the gold filings!    ********
 
Remember in the early days of Television there was program called Ripley’s Believe it Not.    Every day absurdities were exposed.    I can top any that were ever published!   I read the Jerome Larkin teaches CLE (Continuing Legal Education) classes on ethics!!!!!
 
Half of the people in the United States are below average in intelligence!!!
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky
 
My response: I think Janet Phelan is right on in invoking international treaties against torture.   Forced druggings, false imprisonments in nursing homes, intentional and strenuous isolation from a multitude of family members and close friends are rampant.  It is psychological and physical torture that did not come with a declaration of war or the “undeclaration” of war.  It is clear and insidious torture on the elderly and disableds nonetheless==and their families.

From Ken Ditkowsky –just who is aiding and abetting the Sykes, Gore, Wyman, IL, Spera and other tragedies

To: Glenda Martinez <glenest03@yahoo.com>, Sam Sugar <ssugarmd@msn.com>, “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” <gcoleman@bclclaw.com>
Subject: Fw: Frankel v State of Indiana
Date: Aug 21, 2014 8:23 PM
What should be attached is a document filed in that case which addresses your problem to a tea!     According to Indiana lawyers the Chief Judge of the Indiana Supreme Court was forced to retire  because of this Frankel case.    It appeared that the Department of Justice clamped down on him after he refused to accommodate.
 
This ‘elder cleansing’ scandal is massive and bit by bit the USA is getting more pro-active.   The bad guys are the nursing home/hospice operators who are spreading bribes around like money was water.    (The days of the white envelope filled with cash are over).    I’ve been watching Illinois and waiting for the IRS’ political corruption unit to show up on Mr. Jerome Larkin’s door and *******.    (saw them operate during the Dan Walker (Illinois) administration – and also in connection with *****).     These guys are so intimidating you want to confess to whatever they want you *****.     In the early 1980’s I was having lunch with one of the my opponents in the Cigarette Use Tax case and watch his hands shake when one of the IRS agents came by our table to say hello to me.    Phil ***** could not eat another drop of food.     For months afterwards I implored my IRS friend to market his appeal to some of my friends who were having a weight problem.
 
As the United States of America is developing a choir in South Florida and apparently intends to present a concert in the near future – it really would be in the best interests of the political populations to ‘get religion!’     They should read Federal Statutes for penitence and in particular, the Americans with Disabilities Act.    Doing the right thing and complying strictly with the Federal Statutes is strongly advised.      The consequences of avarice can be fatal to *******.    
 
I am recommending that the Justice Department get verified full and complete statements of your complaints   =  Mr. Coleman promised that he would “look into” this guardianship infamy – I would recommend that he be called on his promise and he also receive all the information that is relevant or MAY LEAD TO RELEVANT INFORMATION.      If the FBI gets the information that it desires there are a large number of lawyers and judges who are going to populate our jails very soon.    In my opinion, any lawyer who is involved in this ‘elder cleansing’ scenario who does not sojourn to the nearest Federal building an offer the join the choir is not very bright!  
 
Ken Ditkowsky
 
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:25 PM
Subject: Frankel v State of Indiana
Attached is a document found in the case of Frankel v Indiana       This is a case arising under the Americans with Disability Act and the facts are very simple.     The attachment was sent to me.
 
What this attachment demonstrates is that the position of the Attorney General of the United States is very clear.   A disabled person does not lose any rights by action of government, the only rights lost are those which nature takes from him/her.    Congress has decreed that government shall do its level best to accommodate the disabled person so that the person’s handicap is limited as much as possible.
 
JoAnne – what makes this position paper so important is that while Mr. Jerome Larkin and Ms. Guzman do not believe in the Rule of Law as set forth by the Constitution, the Supreme Court decisions, et al,    Larkin is alone with his cronies in very serious violations of the law.    Mr. Holder in Frankel points out just how far he expects government to go to protect the disabled person.   This is far cry from what happened and was approved by Larkin in reference to Sykes, Gore etc.    In point of fact it appears that Larkin is not only aiding and abetting the criminal felonies that have been committed, but he is doing so in the fact of yet another Federal Statute.
 
Few public officials, except for a house painter in the 1930’s, went as far as Mr. Larkin.    Ms. Guzman in her recent letter to the Coopers apparently, with the consent of Larkin, compounds the felony.     Read the Statement of Interest of the United States of America that is attached.    
 
As a matter of courtesy and pursuant to Himmel, I have sent a copy of the position paper to the IARDC so that if there is anyone present who takes the oath of an attorney seriously, an Honest, complete, intelligent and comprehensive investigation of Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman will take place expeditiously and honestly.     Larkin is reported not have filed an Ethics statement (for many years) and investigators have informed me of irregularities hinted at *****.     The IARDC should not have as its administrator a person who is demonstrating no respect for the law and who is consistently misusing his position.
 
Ken Ditkowsky
 
 
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: 
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: WestlawNext – RETHINKING GUARDIANSHIP (AGAIN): SUBSTITUTED DECISION MAKING AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
I am just catching up to the return home …. 
 
attached is the “PrakelDOJ Statement of Interest  ——  pay particular close attention to the issue of “associational discrimination” and the role family members play in support of one and other in court proceedings …..   then think about all this family interference taking place and all the victims screaming about their family members …..    once you have digested this DOJ doc …..  let me know and I want to send you a particular SCOTUS case  
to read with this DOJ statement
 
 

—–Original Message—–

Sent: Thu, Aug 21, 2014 4:13 pm
Subject: Fw: WestlawNext – RETHINKING GUARDIANSHIP (AGAIN): SUBSTITUTED DECISION MAKING AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

Another Dose of Justifiable Out Rage from Ken Ditkowsky after an ARDC Response to the case of Alice Gore

 
Another letter from Ms. Guzman at the ARDC in response to a complaint against Ms. Solo (aka Soloveichik)
 
 
Of course, this is the letter in which the Coopers detail the fact that $1.5 million was missing from Mother Alice Gore’s estate and further, 29 gold teeth were pulled from a 99 year old woman.  Does all of that faze the ARDC?  Of course not!
 
Favorite quote:
 
After carefully reviewing the information and documentation you submitted, we have
determined that many of your complaints are essentially disagreements regarding the legal
actions taken, advice given and decisions made by Ms. Vidal. The attorney for an Estate
maintains certain discretion in conducting the business of an estate, which would not generally
provide a basis for the discipline of the attorney.
 
From: Lucius Verenus <verenusl@gmail.com>
To: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: ardc response Alice R. Gore 8-18-14 -COMPLAINT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ken,  another point of interest is the claim by Ms. Guzman and Ms. Hays that Ms. Hays is a “guardian” as mentioned in the court transcript.  Ms. Hays is an employee of the “American Bank” that handled the financial aspects of Alice’s estate.  She was never appointed by the court as a guardian.  While Alice was alive Kimberly Cooper (a disabled person) was her guardian and Kimberly’s guardian at that time may have been the Katten law firm. kc
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 PM, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. and Mrs. Cooper,
 
Thank you for forwarding to me the latest response of Ms. Guzman and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
 
I had occasion this past week to have discussions with Tim concerning the Americans With Disabilities Act.    I had previously read the act, but, I had not previously read the regulations promulgated by the Department of Justice.    Briefly the Act is Congress’ statement as to protecting the all disabled people including senior citizens such as Alice Gore.       The action seeks to prevent exactly what happened to Alice Gore, Mary Sykes, ********.       
 
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I am forwarding Ms. Guzman’s letter to the Justice Department.    The letter is another in a series of Cover-up and aiding and abetting communications designed not to do the job that was delegated to the ARDC – i.e. protecting the public and in particular disabled people.    As an example – Ask Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman how it accommodates a senior citizen to have her separated from her family, have her assets removed from her, and have her teeth mined for the gold content of her filings!
 
When Ms. Guzman suggests that the complaints made are disingenuous she and Mr. Larkin (who is her supervisor) are not only being disingenuous, but are aiding and abetting the felonies that you have reported!     I do not know where Mr. Larkin and Ms Guzman are coming from in making the statements that they made.   Both are fully aware that 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq.  is not a ‘ carte blanc‘ delegation of Mrs. Gore’s civil and human rights to whomever a corrupt judge wishes to reward.     Like ADA the guardianship act is designed to provided whatever limited assistance that Alice Gore reasonably needed and wanted.    
 
The stand to be determined was no “the best interests of the ward” as determine artificially by a avarice inspired political hack who was appointed by a Judge.    The standard is what the alleged then and there and there disabled person reasonably wanted as best could be determined.   (If the alleged disabled person is not disabled as to the particular subject matter the guardian has no jurisdiction or discretion – without a special court hearing complete with notice and hearing and a finding by the court based upon the notice hearing.  Asking Adam Stern or Miriam Solo what the disabled person desired is not compliance with the law – it is another lawless action that violates basic civil rights).
 
Getting back to the violations of federal law that Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkin are engaged.   (see 18 USCA 371).    It is apparent that both Ms. Guzman and Larkin knew that Congress has decreed that citizens with disabilities are no second class citizens.    Both are aware that government and others must make reasonable accommodation for the disabled senior citizen and a instrumentality whose actual purpose as demonstrated in a bunch of reports to congress by governmental agencies is pernicious and abusive is not compliance – IT IS A CRIMINAL ACT.
 
THUS, I am forwarding the letter you received to the ADA administration and the Justice Department and I am advising you that you should do the same.   In your complaint you should report chapter and verse and forward copies of all the CYA and other disingenious communications that you reveived from Mr. Larkin, Ms. Guzman et al.       What we have in the attached letter is a serious violation of the law that Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman knows is such a violation.     
 
As I am lead to believe that both Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkin are lawyers, pursuant to Himmel I have copied the IARDC.     It is their obligation to investigation both Ms Guzman and Mr. larkin and determine why they have violated the clear mandate of the ADA and its regulations and continue to aid and abet the violation of the liberty and the property rights of senior citizens.     (I expect that the IARDC will continue the cover-up – but at least the required Himmel Report will be made).    
 
For the record – my response is intended to be public and may be reproduced at your discretion and desire.   
 
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky

More reports of Nefariousness from the IL case

Originally posted on MaryGSykes.com:

One of the things I have warned repeatedly about on this blog are probate attorneys that do nothing while the miscreants are committing torts left and right, and those that promise “you will be back in your house in 6 months if you (fill in the blank– pay us money, don’t object to our felonies, abuse, ridiculous gag orders and illegal restraints on visitations or visits with tied in agencies on secret lists that are never bidded out or have performance bench markers and parameters.  Go figure.)

So today, dedicated son calls me and says “I’ve had it with court”, they have lied to me, it’s taken me 2 years to get supervised visitation they want all of $800k which has been in both my name and my parent’s names for a decade, my evil sib is telling the court I owned nothing at the home, there are pipes burst…

View original 700 more words

More reports of Nefariousness from the IL case

One of the things I have warned repeatedly about on this blog are probate attorneys that do nothing while the miscreants are committing torts left and right, and those that promise “you will be back in your house in 6 months if you (fill in the blank– pay us money, don’t object to our felonies, abuse, ridiculous gag orders and illegal restraints on visitations or visits with tied in agencies on secret lists that are never bidded out or have performance bench markers and parameters.  Go figure.)

So today, dedicated son calls me and says “I’ve had it with court”, they have lied to me, it’s taken me 2 years to get supervised visitation they want all of $800k which has been in both my name and my parent’s names for a decade, my evil sib is telling the court I owned nothing at the home, there are pipes burst in the home with slow repairs (as published on the blog as a typical scheme/scam) and now they want to move the contents out of the home into storage and they have valued it at about 10% of it’s value and don’t want an independent appraisal.

The real question is, why does he put up with a lawyer that stands by and “just goes along.”

Probably money  Probably some promised deal that will never materialize, not in 1000 years or down below gets colder than a polar bear’s bum on the arctic circle. And this lawyer is not the only lawyer I have heard sold out this month.  Another Ms. LR is on the docket for that scam. (They promise opposing counsel if they “go along” they will get more business or the coveted fee petition paid 100%.  I propose asking your attorney if their fees are cut by about 80 to 100% like mine–see the Janie Thomas case where they cut my fees 100% and the OPG was proud of this nefariousness, then your lawyer isn’t doing his or her job)  In Olson, for keeping a man in his own home for 1.5 years, I got a fee cut of 80%.  Go ahead, ask your lawyer if they are part of the problem or part of the solution.  Not being paid in probate is the golden ticket of honesty.

So, I will say this again, why put up with an attorney like that who will not remind the court of the law, each and every time an issue is brought up.

In this case, mom repeatedly says she wants to go home.  At least 3 attorneys are ignoring her pleas.  The law is, if a senior wants to go home, they get to go home.

I asked Mr. IL if his attorney put that in writing and filed it with the court.  Answer: no.

The GAL’s have also told Mr. IL they want 100% of his joint account.  I want to know why, after 2 years of litigation that account has not been partitioned with him getting half?  Son responded “I don’t care about the money.”  But the reality is, yes, you do because without your mother sitting on a pile of cash, the miscreants won’t go away.  They will drain, and drain and drain.  Got it?  The money also puts you in control.  Sorry about your altruistic attitude, but if you want to get them to follow the law and do what they’re supposed to do, lack of money on the 18th floor is a fine motivator.

The son has given me permission to publish and name names.  But the reality is, I’m not sure he’s ready for the backlash.  Further, names aren’t all that important on this blog.  I hear story after story of the same issues, facts and outcomes.

There is no Santa Claus on the 18th floor and if an attorney promises you your loved one back in 6 months for a payment of cash in fees (made up), it won’t happen.  2 years later this son is sitting with his mother in a locked down facility begging to go home.

Again, if you want to avoid the 18th floor, put your money off shore.  Sell the home and lease it back.  Get certificates of competency on a regular basis prepared to send to the court until they give up.  Buy an RV and leave the state.  The rats nests are on a county by county basis, far as I can tell and as John Wyman will tell you, there is no cooperation between these thieves.

Most of all, keep on praying for our cause to clean up the courts.  With your prayers each night pray for the court corruption victims and pray for truth and justice.  Just add it to your prayers and meditation.

Thanks for listening. Despite what the ARDC claims, this blog is the truth and the whole truth and I will take a polygraph to prove it any day.  Ask Jerome Larkin to do the same.  He’ll never show. Ask Ken Ditkowsky to do the same.  He’ll come with bells on and pass it with flying colors.

JoAnne

 

 

 

A link to a show for Joanne Denison on Cooper’s Corner and Elder Cleansing

Please watch and see how the probate court fostered the terrorizing of 99 year old Alice Gore pulling 27 gold teeth and how Bev Cooper and her loved ones were devastate by all of this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9WThVuXql8

If you have not seen Mr. Lanre Amu’s program, you should do so now, he details the agony of being suspended for merely telling the truth, breaking the code of silence, and protecting his own clients, who were ordinary people, like you and I, who had no clout, but the other lawyers and their clients apparently did:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTPSZNh4wj4

A LINK to Ken’s recent appearance on Cooper’s Corner where he discusses his plea to the US Supreme Court to SAVE HIS LAW LICENSE

I’ve respectfully requested a meeting for the families of the victims of elder cleansing.     I have not received a response.     This is an acute problem that is akin to the 9/11 attack on America.   The distinction is the fact that the perpetrators are people in responsible positions whose amoral agenda is a cancer attacking our core values.
 
From JoAnne:
 
Ken has written Atty Eric Holder for a hearing on “elder cleansing” or probate court abuses of the elderly and their families.
 
We have not received a response yet.
 
Please pray for this and also email Mr. Holder at “askdoj@doj.gov”
 
thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ken Ditkowsky