42 USC section 10201–the ADA or Americans with Disabilities Act, can it help Probate Victims and their families?

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 28, 2014 4:59 PM
To: Tim NASGA
Cc: Eric Holder , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Matt Senator Kirk
Subject: ADA

 
 Lets start putting this together.
 
Guardianship has been sued by the criminal element within the legal profession for a bunch of purposes.    In the Wyman case it was used to get rid of wife!    In **** to dissolve a business relationship.    In Tyler to steal eight million dollars, in Gore 1.5 million dollars, in Sykes almost 2 million dollars *****.   
 
I am certain that the funds obtained were not reported on either their State or Federal Income taxes!     It therefore follows that we have tax evasion.    
 
To translate into simple terms.    Let us assume that the guardianship statute was used to get rid of a business partner.  The business partner is a fiduciary and therefore no matter how many court orders are obtain from the Court, any benefit that is obtained is taxable for Federal Income Tax and State income tax purposes!     Also the partner is liable for the breach of fiduciary relationship to the subservient partner.    A fiduciary cannot profit from his/her misdeeds.
 
When others join the foray they become conspirators and share the liability – including the criminal liability.    The outrageousness of invasion of privacy adds to the liability (tort) and is entitled to redress.
 
The foregoing notwithstanding society pays a price for the wrongful conduct of the guardianship and the corrupt public officials.   An adjudicated person cannot enter into contracts and an entity that deals with the adjudicated person is guilty of a misdemeanor.    The contract is void!    However, the only rights that are taken from the victim are those that he/she cannot reasonable perform.
 
Let me suggest that the Court appointed guardian who allow a situation to exist in which a person is wrongfully placed in a guardianship  – and does not on his/her own end the guardianship has personal responsibility (pecuniary) for all the expenses incurred.    Taking the Mary Sykes case as an example – Peter Schmiedel, Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, et al are all aware that Mary Sykes was never legally incompetent and more importantly was never properly adjudicated.    The videos that JoAnn published on her blog demonstrate the wrongful incarceration, sequestration, and taking of Mary’s liberty and assets.     By participation in this fraud each has proactively caused Mary harm and should be liable to her and Gloria for this tort.  (See Article 1 Section 12) of the Illinois Constitution of 1970.     
 
Mr. Larkin for his participation and assault on the First Amendment should share jointly and severally the liability.      Certainly Larkin is aware of Congress’ statement, to wit:
 

42 U.S. Code § 12101 – Findings and purpose

Current through Pub. L. 113-142, except 128. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
prev | next
(a) Findings
The Congress finds that—
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person’s right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from doing so because of discrimination; others who have a record of a disability or are regarded as having a disability also have been subjected to discrimination;

(2) historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and, despite some improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals with disabilities continue to be a serious and pervasive social problem;

(3) discrimination against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as employment, housing, public accommodations, education, transportation, communication, recreation, institutionalization, health services, voting, and access to public services;

(4) unlike individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or age, individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of disability have often had no legal recourse to redress such discrimination;

(5) individuals with disabilities continually encounter various forms of discrimination, including outright intentional exclusion, the discriminatory effects of architectural, transportation, and communication barriers, overprotective rules and policies, failure to make modifications to existing facilities and practices, exclusionary qualification standards and criteria, segregation, and relegation to lesser services, programs, activities, benefits, jobs, or other opportunities;

(6) census data, national polls, and other studies have documented that people with disabilities, as a group, occupy an inferior status in our society, and are severely disadvantaged socially, vocationally, economically, and educationally;

(7) the Nation’s proper goals regarding individuals with disabilities are to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for such individuals; and

(8) the continuing existence of unfair and unnecessary discrimination and prejudice denies people with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities for which our free society is justifiably famous, and costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity.

(b) Purpose
It is the purpose of this chapter—
(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(2) to provide clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(3) to ensure that the Federal Government plays a central role in enforcing the standards established in this chapter on behalf of individuals with disabilities; and

(4) to invoke the sweep of congressional authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth amendment and to regulate commerce, in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced day-to-day by people with disabilities.
 
The do not think that the American government has ever had to deal with a cancer such as elder cleansing.      The corruption of certain judicial officials and certain members of the legal profession who facilitate this criminal behavior is so obnoxious that it warrants the strongest rebuke!     The Florida case of Stone is so obnoxious as stripped to its core is extortion by court order and misuse of the Courts.    It has the same ugly twin that give rise to the foreclosures of homes in which the plaintiff had no mortgage or note!    The distinction is that human beings are being treated as chattels!     Shades of Dred Scott and Buck vs. Bell!     
 
Democracy is not a spectator sport!     If we could just get State law enforcement to enforce the law diligently and honestly all of this will go away – unfortunately there is too much money to be made by the dishonest court appointed guardians and those who conspire with them.    
 
Ken Ditkowsky

An appeal to a Floria States Attorney to protect Barbara Stone and her mother from Elder and Family Abuse by the authorities

From: JoAnne M Denison[SMTP:JDENISON@SURFREE.COM]
Sent: August 28, 2014 3:56:18 PM
To: donlhorn@MiamiSAO.com; Barbara Stone; Alyece Russell;
Michael Nofsinger; Kenneth Ditkowsky [Ditkowsky Law]; Sylvia Rudek NASGA;
Ask the Dept of Justice.com
Subject: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Dear Mr Horn

I am an attorney in Illinois who writes a blog about probate cases* and I also practice  our probate decision handling dozens of cases involving guardianships where family members are isolated from their loved ones and placed in locked down nursing homes and are drugged.  Estates are drained by tied in attorneys and court appointed agencies who bill but do not protect or even care very much at all other than their financial renumerations.

The use of psychotropic drugs on persons over 60 and under 20 is contraindicated by the FDA and is not an FDA approved usage of those drugs.  As such, any licensed physician or physician’s assistant issuing such prescriptions should be promptly reported to the appropriate disciplinary authority for their licensing abuses.

I have heard that Ms. Barbara Stone has been isolated from her mother when she in fact has made diligent efforts to protect her mother and follow Federal and State laws pertaining to  Elder Abuse.  I also understand that Ms. Stone’s mother was drugged without notice and authorization by her.  This was a civil assault against her.

I understand that  it has been reported that Barbara’s mother had to be  admitted to the hospital emaciated and near death from lack of food and hydration.  I have received dozens of reports of such crimes, and I am appalled by the inappropriate response of law enforcement to typically blame the good family members that report these abuses and seek to protect the elder, but instead they become the victim and are prosecuted for their attempts to protect while the miscreants are granted immunity and allowed to continue in practices that foster these situations.  Such is a horrendous tragedy.  Simply due to their position, power and authority, nursing homes, hospitals and other institutions are not infrequently found with starved, dehydrated elders, and then when a family member reports, the family member is banned, false protective orders are obtained–all in an effort to deflect the true criminals, the licensed professionals that allow these crimes to happen under their own roofs.

I hope that you will cease putting Barbara through this turmoil that is the result of law enforcement’s and the state attorney failure to protect her mother while granting immunity to miscreants. It is time to stop these common practices.

Barbara and her mother must be reunited immediately–without restrictions and without any supervision. To deprive an 86 woman at the end of her life the comfort of her daughter is discriminatory under federal and state laws and is an act of cruel and unusual punishment under the US and Florida Constitutions.

Sincerely,

JoAnne Denison

* my blogs are located at http://www.marygyskes.com and http://www.justice4every1.com

cc: marygsykes.com and Atty Barbara Stone
Please see the following relevant Florida statutes:

(2)  “Caregiver” means a person who has been entrusted with or has assumed responsibility for the care or the property of an elderly person or disabled adult. “Caregiver” includes, but is not limited to, relatives, court-appointed or voluntary guardians, adult household members, neighbors, health care providers, and employees and volunteers of facilities as defined in subsection (7).
825.102  Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties. —
 
(1)  “Abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
(a)  Intentional infliction of physical or psychological injury upon an elderly person or disabled adult;
(b)  An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult; or
(c)  Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult.

A person who knowingly or willfully abuses an elderly person or disabled adult without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2)  “Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult” occurs when a person:
(a)  Commits aggravated battery on an elderly person or disabled adult;
(b)  Willfully tortures, maliciously punishes, or willfully and unlawfully cages, an elderly person or disabled adult; or
(c)  Knowingly or willfully abuses an elderly person or disabled adult and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult.

A person who commits aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3)(a)  “Neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
1.  A caregiver’s failure or omission to provide an elderly person or disabled adult with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the elderly person’s or disabled adult’s physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2.  A caregiver’s failure to make a reasonable effort to protect an elderly person or disabled adult from abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person.
 
 
825.103  Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties. —
 
(1)  “Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:
(a)  Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person’s or disabled adult’s funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who:
1.  Stands in a position of trust and confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2.  Has a business relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult;
(b)  Obtaining or using, endeavoring to obtain or use, or conspiring with another to obtain or use an elderly person’s or disabled adult’s funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who knows or reasonably should know that the elderly person or disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent; or
(c)  Breach of a fiduciary duty to an elderly person or disabled adult by the person’s guardian or agent under a power of attorney which results in an unauthorized appropriation, sale, or transfer of property.
(2)(a)  If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b)  If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $20,000 or more, but less than $100,000, the offender commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c)  If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult is valued at less than $20,000, the offender commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History. — s. 4, ch. 95-158; s. 5, ch. 96-322; s. 1, ch. 97-78; s. 29, ch. 2009-223.
 


JoAnne Denison, Executive Director
Justice 4 Every1, NFP 5940 W. Touhy Ave, #120 Niles, IL 60714

 

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 28, 2014 4:24 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , “donlhorn@miamisao.com” , BILL DITKOWSKY , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com”
Subject: Re: The illegal assault, prosecution and persecution of Barbara Stone and her mother


 Tim sent me the following which indicates that Congress also made a strong statement in enacting ADA, to wit:
 

42 U.S. Code § 12101 – Findings and purpose

Current through Pub. L. 113-142, except 128. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
 
(a) Findings
The Congress finds that—
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person’s right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from doing so because of discrimination; others who have a record of a disability or are regarded as having a disability also have been subjected to discrimination;

(2) historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and, despite some improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals with disabilities continue to be a serious and pervasive social problem;

(3) discrimination against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as employment, housing, public accommodations, education, transportation, communication, recreation, institutionalization, health services, voting, and access to public services;

(4) unlike individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or age, individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of disability have often had no legal recourse to redress such discrimination;

(5) individuals with disabilities continually encounter various forms of discrimination, including outright intentional exclusion, the discriminatory effects of architectural, transportation, and communication barriers, overprotective rules and policies, failure to make modifications to existing facilities and practices, exclusionary qualification standards and criteria, segregation, and relegation to lesser services, programs, activities, benefits, jobs, or other opportunities;

(6) census data, national polls, and other studies have documented that people with disabilities, as a group, occupy an inferior status in our society, and are severely disadvantaged socially, vocationally, economically, and educationally;

(7) the Nation’s proper goals regarding individuals with disabilities are to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for such individuals; and

(8)  the continuing existence of unfair and unnecessary discrimination and prejudice denies people with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities for which our free society is justifiably famous, and costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity.

(b) Purpose
It is the purpose of this chapter—
(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(2) to provide clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(3) to ensure that the Federal Government plays a central role in enforcing the standards established in this chapter on behalf of individuals with disabilities; and

(4) to invoke the sweep of congressional authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth amendment and to regulate commerce, in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced day-to-day by people with disabilities.
 

It therefore follows that the State officials who are not following their statutes and ADA are flirting with some very serious problems = including jail time.     The  refusal of lawyer disciplinary commissions to honor the mandate of the United STates of America and local law enforcement to not pro=actively protect the disabled and their families is of very serious concern.   

I am under the impression that Mr. Horn in the Stone case is a new broom.     We know that Mr. Coleman is the newly elected President of the Florida Bar.    Thus, both are blessed with a fresh start and the ability to make things right in the Stone case.    It is too late in some of the other cases;however, we have to start somewhere.     With a grand jury acting on health care fraud in South Florida it is an ideal time to clamp down on this guardianship fraud.
 
In Illinois and in the other states wherein elder cleansing is spreading it cancerous venom a strong response is also called for.    Mr. Jerome Larkin’s ARDC alteration of the transcripts of Judge Stuart’s testimony is a starting point.   The sudden demonstrable wealth of the guardian in the Sykes case is another starting point.    There can be no justification for the conduct of the guardians in the Illinois cases – what benefit was there to the Estate of Gore by the prospecting for Gold in the teeth of Alice Gore?     There is similarly no justification for Larkin’s assault on the First Amendment. 

Ken Ditkowsky

From Ken Ditkowsky — Bill of Elder Rights for Floridians is excellent statutory detail

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 27, 2014 12:40 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago Tribune , Chicago FBI , SUNTIMES , Tim NASGA , “FBI- ( (” , Cook County States Attorney , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “Y. ACLU” , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Cook Sheriff , Bev Cooper , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , “Chicagotonight (” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “tips@cbschicago.com” , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , Fiduciary Watch , “Jim (” , Martin Kozak , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Human Rights Watch , The Wall Street Journal , “info@bettergov.org” , “information@iardc.org” , “information@elderaffairs.org”
Cc: Tim Lahrman , The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right <3d@mail.americanbar.org>, “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Martha Jantho
Subject: Fw: Fw: WestlawNext – Busse v. Motorola, Inc.

Following through on yesterday’s memorandum, it is important to note that when you examine the statutes it is clear that they are consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act.   Thus, Mr. Lahrman is 100% correct in his analysis.    
 
The tort of outrageous intrusion provides a cause of action that is available to the aggrieved.   As I have a right to the companionship of my spouse, my brother, my mother et al, I have standing!    As Tim Lahrman has pointed out there is no immunity under ADA.    Thus,  as an example, Jerome Larkin is ‘naked’ as to such an action – just as he is naked as to any immunity to aid and abet the felonies of elder cleansing.    
 
I am impressed with the detail of the Florida Statute:
 
 (1) A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: [1]
(a) To have an annual review of the guardianship report and plan.
(b) To have continuing review of the need for restriction of his or her rights.
(c) To be restored to capacity at the earliest possible time.
(d) To be treated humanely, with dignity and respect, and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
(e) To have a qualified guardian.
(f) To remain as independent as possible, including having his or her preference as to place and standard of living honored, either as he or she expressed or demonstrated his or her preference prior to the determination of his or her incapacity or as he or she currently expresses his or her preference, insofar as such request is reasonable.
(g) To be properly educated.
(h) To receive prudent financial management for his or her property and to be informed how his or her property is being managed, if he or she has lost the right to manage property [2] .
(i) To receive services and rehabilitation necessary to maximize the quality of life.
(j) To be free from discrimination because of his or her incapacity.
(k) To have access to the courts.
(l) To counsel.
(m) To receive visitors and communicate with others. [3]
(n) To notice of all proceedings related to determination of capacity and guardianship, unless the court finds the incapacitated person lacks the ability to comprehend the notice.
(o) To privacy.
 

[1] This retention of Rights is important as it is consistent with ADA, the uniform act and the State of Illinois Act.    1(d) is the most important as essentially it means that a disabled person is not prey!      It incorporates the provision of Americans with Disabilities.    Section 1(f) is more specific in incorporating ADA as it changes the standard from “best interests” to the preference of the disabled person.
[2] This second recognizes that not every guardianship gives the guardian carte blanc to the life savings of the victim.    It is only in the situation wherein the individual cannot manage his/her money.   Exactly what this means is left open.   It does not mean that the guardian is to be presumed to be more capable than the presumed incompetent.    In point of fact, the standard of competency is not very high.
[3] Isolation of the ward is prohibited – this is the most ignored portion of the act.   The guardians and the Court universally separate the ward from family and friends.
 
This is not Einstein stuff!     Florida has laid bare the Law of the Land and its legislature’s attempt to comply with the basic values of America.    Like our Jerome Larkin, many in the judiciary have chosen to ignore the obvious protections for their own pecuniary benefits.     (I make the assumption of pecuniary benefit based upon the fact that Larkin appears not to have filed the ethical disclosures required by statute and his continued proactive assault on the First Amendment).
 
What is interesting is the loyalty that Larkin exhibits to the miscreants.    At this point in time he is well aware that the jig is up!     Miriam Solo’s alleged role in the mining of Alice Gore’s teeth cannot be ‘covered up’ any more.   Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel’s role in the wrongful conduct conducted in Judge Stuart’s courtroom (intimidation of Gloria Sykes by chaining her and threatening her) no longer can be sweep under the rug.   Judge Stuart admission under oath whether wrongfully purged from the transcript or not is still of record and was heard by onlookers!       Thus, Larkin is certainly aware that the rope is tightening.     All he had to do a few months ago was to do the job he was hired to do and he would escape!    However, like a suicide bomber, Larkin continues his assault on the First Amendment and in particular the Bill of Rights!     Why?
 
It would have been easy to dismiss his prosecution of JoAnne Dennison.    Win lose or draw 47 USCA 230 cannot be ignored, nor can the SCOTHUS decisions!     At some point in time law enforcement will have the courage to indict Larkin!     Even Larkin’s clout will not be enough to protect him – unless the clout wishes to share a jail cell!
Thus – why is he so pro=active!!!!
 
The answer to question will become evident very soon.    
 
Our focus however is not Larkin or his counterparts – our focus is the senior who has been railroaded and had his/her liberty, human and civil rights forfeited by our miscreant nazi captors.      If we get the information as to the felonies to law enforcement we stand a good chance of prosecution of the miscreants.    Health care fraud is killing all health care reform including insurance.    At 70% plus even the most inept bureaucrat has to recognize this fact!    Thus nursing homes, hospice facilities, guardianship, and suppliers of health care products have to obtain religion.    The religious training will have to be  by force as voluntary measures have failed.    Our current president has staked his legacy on health care, and unless he wants his administration to be an embarrassment the Administration has to forthwith start the prosecution of people such as Larkin!    
 
Providing the law enforcement people with accurate and concise information as to the miscreant activities means a tax revenue windfall for not only the Federal government but the State government.   Let’s look at Carolyn Troepe.      Prior to her wrongful (lack of jurisdiction) appointment as Mary Sykes’ guardian she and her chronically unemployed husband were insolvent.    Today, they host expensive parties, have made substantial improvements to their home, and Ms. T sports very very expensive jewelry.    Adam Stern sports a 60,000 dollar Federal Tax lien.  Mary’s substantial estate has been reduced to virtually zero!     How much Jerome Larkin, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel et al have received from the Estate is unknown.       Whatever they received is taxable income!     A similar scenario is present in every one the cases.    In Gore it is 1.5 million.   In Tyler it is eight million, etc., etc.    
 
The only logical reason that I can up with for these fiduciaries to be so resistant to the Statutes, and their obligations to the disabled person is that the amount of money to be gained is so great that ******.
 
IN THE EVENT THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT is also not interested in doing its job we may have to go to Court ourselves.    Attached is information on one of the causes of action that we should consider.     HOWEVER  at this point in time lets keep law enforcement appraised and keep demanding that they end the American gulag and put an end to the 9/11 attack on American values augmented by people such as Jerome Larkin, et al.
 

From Barbara Stone–a lawyer/probate victim in Florida under house arrest–merely for protecting her mother

From: Barbara Stone
Sent: Aug 26, 2014 12:15 AM
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky , “joanne@justice4every1.com” , Janet Phelan , Eric Holder , Human Rights Watch , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Probate Sharks , “J. Ditkowsky” , Harry Heckert , Matt Senator Kirk , ISBA Main Discussion Group ,  etc.
Subject: Guardianship fraud

Certain of the members of the Florida Bar use their organization as a front for their orchestrating and acting as an accomplice to cause atrocities, embezzlement and death of certain classes of citizens, the elderly, disabled and the vulnerable in a scheme operating under the guise of guardianship. 

My 86 year old mother, Helen Stone is being abused, extorted and her death is being orchestrated by a criminal enterprise that operates under a guise of “guardianship”. 

Federal and State Laws prohibit abuse, aggravated abuse, exploitation, embezzlement and discrimination.  They prohibit murder and premeditated murder.

 

This lawless operation has taken human ownership of my mother. She is a chattel in their possession with less rights than a criminal. 

  1. This criminal enterprise takes the assets of their victim pre-death.  This is the most byzantine of concepts.  The predator attorney for a family member of course knows that once a person is placed in a guardianship, their assets will NEVER be returned to them.  Like the Third Reich confiscated the assets of their victims in Nazi Germany, so is the activity of the attorneys who engage in extorting ill gotten gains .
  1. Dr. Swier describes this treasonous conduct in his expose of the atrocities that were committed against Marie Winkleman

 

http://drrichswier.com/2014/02/14/free-marie-winkelman-pray-for-justice-now/

 

  1. Once the assets of their victim get transferred to the criminal enterprise their agenda becomes shifts to the manner in which to cause the death of their prey while making it appear they are being attended and while gauging how to most effectively cause their death .  It is a known fact the elderly die and deteriorate without stimulation and their loved ones in their life.    The masterminds of this murderous industry employ stay away orders as the tool to effectuate the isolation.  All family members except those who are participating in the premeditated death plot are vanished by the stroke of a pen from their loved one.  All over the state,  children are prohibited from seeing their parents.  Verboten –  Third Reich activities. How is it possible that children and family members are harmful to their loved ones and their loved ones are being “protected” by these mobsters? It is not possible.  It is crime so heinous that EMERGENCY MEASURES ARE NEEDED.
  1. Once isolated the victim is alone and the crimes become insidious. Committed in secrecy with no eyes.   Their house becomes a house of horrors.  My mother had no food.  My mother was left in her bed with soiled clothes and drugged mercilessly.    She was rushed by emergency to the hospital after I sent my spiritual leader to see her and he reported she was incoherent.  She was diagnosed in the hospital with dehydration, malnutrition, pneumonia, fractures, and other life threatening conditions.  She was emaciated.  She was forcibly implanted a feeding tube although she was perfectly capable of eating. She has now been forcibly taken to a lock down facility where she is chemically restrained. She was given fake dime store glasses so has constant headaches as she cannot see.  Her torment is masterminded by a monster / mobster with a law license. 
  1. Web sites are prolific describing the new Third Reich.
  1. The new atrocity is the “feeding tube” guise.  This has been exposed as a deprivation of life tactic.  Feeding tubes are forced on people perfectly capable of eating   because it is convenient for and serves the interest of their “caretaker” who has no need to tend to them or feed them.  These people are DEPRIVED OF THEIR RIGHT TO EAT AND FORCED TO UNERGO SURGERY TO IMPLANT A FEEDING TUBE.   This atrocity was forced on my mother.   Mrs. Schindler, Terri Schiavo’s mother has discussed this with me and others in great depth. 

Guardianship is a crime against humanity.  We are watching our loved ones being deprived of their life under our eyes.  They are helplessly watching their own death occur.  Can you imagine?   

 THE BAR SHOULD ACCEPT NO LESS THAN  ZERO  TOLERANCE – these lawyers denigrate all lawyers.

BRING MY MOTHER HOME TO ME.  NOW.  IMMEDIATELY.  MY MOTHER IS 86 YEARS OLD.  SHE IS BEING ABUSED.  SHE IS BEING EXPLOITED.  SHE IS BEING SUBJECTED TO  ATROCITIES.  SHE HAS SUFFERED ABUSES FOR A THOUSAND LIFETIMES.  SHE DESERVES TO AND MUST LIVE HER REMAINING DAYS IN COMFORT AND WITH HER DAUGHER. 

This is a call for the immediate disbarment of the lawyer engaged in this crime, his arrest and indictment and the arrest and indictment of the criminal enterprise.

  

Barbara Stone

bstone12@hotmail.com

 

Dearest Barbara;

 

My heat goes out to you.  The feeding tube ruse, I agree is a game of death.  Ask Bev and Ken Cooper about her beloved mother who was capable of eating, loved to eat.  So what did they do?  The family protested a feeding tube, so her 29 gold teeth were pulled and she was starved to death!  Cold, calculated and merciless. 

Our country made fun of Russia for it’s orphan children of the poor mothers who were housed cheek to jowl in rotten orphanages, hands tied above their heads or behind their backs so food could be shoved in without hands in the way.  As a result, Russian orphans preferred to eat with hands above their heads or behind their backs.  Americans called that cruel, all the while forcing feeding tubes down seniors that enjoyed leisurely dining with one problem– a caretaker had to help for 15 to 30 minutes.  Greedy nursing home operators won’t pay for that. It’s $5,000 per month for balogny sandwiches tossed at the senior and 5 cent cups of coffee– or nothing.  I hear from seniors in “retirement homes” which are paid for by medicare.  It’s cereal for breakfast, a cheap sandwich for lunch and dinner.  Maybe a couple of slices of cold canned deboned turkey for 2 or 3 holidays per year.  That’s where the state puts them.  Our OPG does it and drains estates of $300k, $500k and up, leaving seniors in these places.  The OPG and probate attorneys take the money for fees and their tied in friends, and eventually the senior is left homeless and penniless.  They take all the money while the senior’s social security pays for dumps to live in with sandwiches for meals.

Again, my heart goes out to you and your mother.  You will both be in my hearts and prayers with 1000 angels to pray and light candles for you both too.

This has to end.   Barbara, they can put you under house arrest, but they cannot silence your truth.  Keep on speaking out.  Don’t stop.

JoAnne

From Ken Ditkoswky–Atty Stone in Florida has been arrested for protecting her own mother

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 25, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Barbara Stone , Sam Sugar , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , “FBI- (”
Subject: Some thoughts on the Barbara Stone matter – and complaint pursuant to 18 USCA 4 to Law Enforcement.

 

Ms. Stone – the atrocities committed against your mother are barbaric and wrong and to be blunt, the acts of a terrorist. ISIS has more respect for the law than appears to be the situation that you face!

I have previously suggested that as attorneys and judges are involved the corrupt actions must be as a matter of law reported to not only the Florida Bar, but law enforcement pursuant to 18 USCA 4.  

As I pointed out to you and Dr. Sugar yesterday the Florida Statute is very specific in protecting the rights of senior citizens and the disabled.    Thus, every member of the Florida Bar is charged with the knowledge that the usurping of the Civil and Human Rights of your mother was not only wrongful but a Felony.    The act of lawyers in preying on an elder vulnerable person by orchestrating the deprivation of food, medical attention and services designed to cause her death and stockpile her assets so this attorney can get sequester them is garden variety theft.    The Charade of Judicial Proceedings in these elder cleansing case is so reprehensible that it warrants the most severe reprimand including disbarment and jail time.   

The fabricating litigation (including quasi criminal proceedings) against you as her (your mother’s) heir is part of an ongoing scheme that discredits not only the legal profession but the State of Florida.   The action labels the Florida justice system in the most derogatory terms and converts the proceedings to the worst category of national socialist gulag [1] .   The Court in prosecuting you in a criminal vein for protesting the exercise of your Civil Rights is an independent violation of the law that cannot be condoned by the United States of America, the State of Florida, or any legitimate Court.    I am therefore urging the FLORIDA BAR and Mr. Coleman to instanter intervene in the travesty of proceedings that you are involved and abrogate the Taliban experience that you are having in Florida.

A Judge ruling that you have no standing to protest the total vitiation of the Florida remedial Statute designed to protect people such as your mother is a clear violation of 42 USCA 1983 and an assault on the First Amendment that cannot be tolerated.   To then press “criminal charges against you” (non-contempt) is an absurdity.   Prefatory rulings in criminal proceedings are ipso facto unconstitutional and a demonstration of bias, and just as serious is for you to not have an appointed attorney and be informed of your RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL.   An honest intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of your case not only required it is mandated by the fundamental credos of America.

  If Judges and lawyers ignore the ‘core values’ of America and the Rule of Law as set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States were have anarchy and chaos.             

[1] I am aware that Gulags were soviet inventions -

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Finding again the Nation of Laws and effective Law Enforcement

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Aug 23, 2014 6:17 PM
To: Barbara Stone , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Nasga Us , Harry Heckert , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Ginny Johnson , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , Glenda Martinez , “FBI- (” , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , ISBA Main Discussion Group , “gcoleman@bclclaw.com” , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Illinois ARDC , BILL DITKOWSKY , GLORIA Jean SYKES , Scott Evans , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (”
Subject: verification of claims

Hundreds of citizens have complained to law enforcement, public officials, the courts, lawyer disciplinary commissions and just about anyone who will listen concerning the felonies of elder cleansing.    Most of the complaints have fallen upon deaf ears.
 
The argument of the miscreants is very simple.   How could these claims have any veracity as a Judge has examined them and found them to be frivolous.   The question then becomes – do you trust the great unwashed or a judge wearing the mantel of respectability and the justice system?    The public memory is short and thus, the miscreant’s appeal allows the conspirators to sweep even the most heinous of felonies under the rug.   It also discourages law enforcement as they recognize that the same judicial mentality is going to address the issue and the result is predictable.   
 
Thus, by the simple prevarication of claiming that the charges are all lies the felons are able to thwart any attempt to end their assaults on the Bill of Rights.    Yes – that is what was done in the 1930s and resulted in the holocaust!   Yes, that is what happened so as to promulgate Operation Greylord!    Yes, that is the story of the Soviet gulags!    
 
How do we counter the conspiracy (18 USCA 371)?   Instead of preaching to the choir each victim or family member of a victim should file verified complaints with the Administrators of the Americans with Disabilities (Justice Department), local, federal and state law enforcement, attorney disciplinary commission, elected representatives and make certain that they are published on one or more of the various blogs devoted to defeating those predators who are proactively conducting the war on the elderly and the disabled. 
 
Why will this be effective when nothing has worked in the past?   There is no guaranty; however, an errant and dishonorable public servant–whether a lawyer, judge, political figure, or an administrator charged with protecting the public from lawyers — at some time is going to be called to account.   Take Mr. Jerome Larkin.   Larkin routinely claims that anyone who does not comport with his mindset and who opposes elder cleansing is a liar.  When called to detail any statement that was untrue or inaccurate of course he never did so freely admitting that he could not – however, his kangaroo commissions had no trouble making generic false findings contrary to their mandate.    Now that 4 people without a scintilla of knowledge attest that black is white, white is black, right is wrong, wrong is right etc it becomes an accepted fact!   HOWEVER, America is still a Nation of Laws and we still have some honest law enforcement people.   Thus, at some point in time, Larkin and his ilk are going to have to provide some backup to their totally false statements — and law enforcement will have verified statements to question each of the miscreants.    
 
It has been pointed out that disabled people are not second class citizens and as to public facilities they must be afforded ‘reasonable accommodation.’   By railroading citizens into un-necessary and predatory guardianships the bad guys are outsmarted themselves.  1) they brought the last piece of remedial legislation into play – i.e. Americans with Disabilities – and Federal jurisdiction; 2) they created fiduciary relationships; and 3) they placed firm legal limits on their ability to cover up their criminal activities.   [As an example - Larkin is aware that Farenga and Stern as guardian ad litem had a duty to report to the Court the robbery of Mary and Gloria's safety deposit box, the large number of emergency room visits by Mary, the improper segregation of Mary from her younger daughter and her two siblings etc.   Larkin in assaulting JoAnne's and my First Amendment Rights committed serious criminal activity in the nature of a felony]
 
All the laws enacted are intended to work together – if a law enforcement officer has all the information available in a verified form his job is made much easier and the reward of a conviction is enhanced.       
 
Ken Ditkowsky
from Joanne
 
It should also be noted that in 2013 that the top 10 banks, from JP Morgan Chase to US Bank and Citibank, etc. paid 17 BILLION DOLLARS  in a variety of fines, from selling worthless mortgages to Fannie Mae (JP Morgan Chase) to the almost $9 billion will go to homeowners who were victims of illegal foreclosure practices.  http://online.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-america-near-16-billion-to-17-billion-settlement-1407355290
 
I just encountered someone this week that was never served in a mortgage foreclosure, but evicted any way.  Another person suffered roof leaks, moved out, the landlord stole all this person’s stuff, he came back, the landlord called the police, said the lease produced was a forgery and he changed the dates by a year.  The Victim was arrested.  We just found out this “landlord” didn’t even have title–the property was owned by the bank after foreclosure!  Please, if you lease, check the title records.  If property is involved in a foreclosure–before or after, a tenant is entitled to 90 days notice prior to an eviction, for obvious reasons.
 
The top banks will pay over 100 BILLION in legal fees to defend various nefarious actions against the US government and consumers alike.  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-28/u-s-bank-legal-bills-exceed-100-billion.html