A must watch video on guardianship

From the video:  mom has hypothyroidism.  Doctor prescribes synthroid which is a drug with a ton of negative, highly reported side effects.  Mom immediately loses ability to walk, talk and becomes incontinent.

The court case is a mess, the Oklahoma doctors are more insane than her mom, and daughter, in a heartfelt, emotional, lay out the facts style tells it all.

Highly recommended as quick training in guardianship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyQG4UT3RA4

A long list of psychotropic drugs, many have fluoride in them. So the docs drug the elders, which is contraindicated, fluoride does cause disease of the mind.  This woman was able to get mom’s list of drugs for an entire year!  As the psychotropic meds went up, the level of dementia went up.  I just found the end of her story, and unfortunately it does not end well after years of psychotropic drugging.

Please pray for Athea.

JoAnne

The way it turned out is she died. Took two years for them to kill her with a chemical cocktail. I’m sorry to hear what you went through. There is someone who posted on her saying he used to direct a nursing home and it made his stomach turn to see what goes on. He got out of the business because he couldn’t take it. He had no real power and the doctor’s orders override all else.

From the Schwager Law firm in Texas–information on another attorney’s view of probate

And while the ARDC is at it trying to suspend me for saying the same things this attorney is saying, and now that Kenneth Ditkowsky has been suspended for saying the exact same things, Atty Candice Schwager also lives the horror and terror on these families.  She has graciously given me permission to repost this, tho she warns that in Texas “professional” guardians can only serve non-family and friends.

Thank you Atty Schwager for your thoughtful posts and information on your own blog (google Candice Schwager Blog-elderlawadvocates.org) to see even more stories of seniors targeted for their wealth and then they and their families live the horrors of guardianships gone wrong, attorneys and judges acting badly.

Schwager Law Firm

ZZZLink to Schwager Firm

Rise of the Guardians? Hello McFly!

Posted: 05 Apr 2015 10:06 PM PDT

rise-of-the-guardians-0vWake up America and go get certified to be a guardian and save your elderly family members and neighbors being chewed up and spit out, taken hostage and murdered through Court appointed guardianship where the mob is in control and the lawyers are the hitmen. I’m not joking. It sounds like a very scary John Grisham Book but it’s actually a children’s superhero movie in the making and each one of you are the heroes!  You are the solution! God told the church to take care of the elderly, widows, poor, disabled, the children. We have handed them over to be slaves and if you think you will escape by looking the other way, God will not be mocked! What you sow, you shall reap.

You have a responsibility and let no one think they can look the other way and pretend what is going on is not!  It is a veritable Holocaust. I am on the front lines and I see it everyday. I am disallusioned and wonder if I am still in America sometimes!  I am in probate court!  Human trafficking! Murder for hire. It’s the most despicable sewer you can ever imagine and your “cause no.” is coming. If you sit and do nothing, you will regret it like nothing you have ever regretted in your life.

Your wealth will be taken from you and you will not enjoy it. Your children will be sold into slavery and you will become a hostage too. Wards of the state, property of Harris County and no one will hear your cry because you are no longer an American. You are an investment because the government is broke. Get up and volunteer. Your competency hearing is next and you will not get a jury trial or due process because the Constitution does not apply in probate court. I am not joking. Alzheimer’s disease is on the rise. It’s much higher than reality. What does that tell you? The panels are firmly in place in Florida–DEATH PANELS instead of juries. The dr panels decide what illness you have.

If people come to rescue you and won’t stop, you will be executed by Seroquel, Haldol Valium and Morphine or starved to death like Willie Jo and Ruby. Choose this day whom you will serve. You cannot serve God and mammon. Read all about in the Bible. What is coming on America is HELL ON EARTH if you don’t get up and help and care!

Facebook Twitter Share

Money Talks, Autism Does Not? I DON’T THINK SO

Posted: 05 Apr 2015 09:40 PM PDT

1337216652“Money Talks, the Disabled Do Not” I DON’T THINK SO!!

I went to probate court and fought as hard as I could fight, working for free in some cases and reduced fee in others. I desperately cried for help but everyone died or was sold to the highest bidder. It was not a nightmare. It hasn’t ended yet and I fear for those still in guardianship.

These people died in the protection of the guardianship program, designed to protect. They were protected from medical care, an education at the lowest federal standard, neglected in criminal ways, and kept from doctors who could save their lives. They were handed over to private professional guardians who exploited them for money and isolated them from their loved ones as they drugged them to the point of death. ”

Cause No. 415959; In re Andrew Stephen Keith Guardianship; Probate Court 3, Harris County

I am a licensed Texas attorney (1998) and certified attorney ad litem (AAL) by the State of Texas. I have represented the disabled for more than five years, with some of my work under the mentorship of Texas Education Agency Hearing Officer James Holtz. James Holtz is without question on a short list of special education hearing officers. Mr. Holtz served 25 years as a mediator and Judge for the State of Texas, charged with the duty to determine whether children received a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”), the minimum required by federal law, under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). The IDEA mandates disabled students be tested every three years unless the parent waives the testing. An IEP educational plan cannot be made without testing.

Andrew’s father waived testing for 9 years after ripping him from his mother, removing him from all medically necessary therapy for autism, and warehousing him in public school, where he languished in neglect as he further retreated into himself, unable to talk. I have never seen such an egregious case of educational and medical neglect and Randall Keith did not even care that the Family Court Judge ordered him to ensure Andrew had medical help for his severe language impairment. Andrew’s father waived all testing and all therapies because he did not want the inconvenience. Andrew was taken from his loving mother for revenge and to avoid paying child support with his multi-million dollar income.

I qualify as an expert under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 702. Ironically, Judge Rory Olsen does not qualify as an expert by virtue of his lack of familiarity with special education. During the hearing, he asked “What’s an ARD?” The appointed lawyers who were board certified were qualified by the state but not qualified in reality, but were given the authority to decide Andrew’s “best interests.” His Lawyer and Temporary Guardian were so concerned with making money off of Andrew as I worked for free that they violated all of Andrew’s rights and three him to the wolves. Andrew could be in danger. Who will help him now? WE have no right to help him and Andrew has been stripped of his rights.

I could not remove the incompetent disqualified ad litems because the Judge decided his decision would be what they recommended and they recommended that the abusive father be appointed because the father is a millionaire who could pay their bill and his expert mother had insufficient funds.

I am also a pre-med major with three years of training at the University Health Science Center after which I studied to become a psychotherapist at the University of Houston program pre-doctorate before I went to law school. I understand dementia, autism, Alzheimers, and medical / psychological conditions more than most, although my true expertise is special education. I am also an author and member of the press. With the thousand plus hours I have given to low income Texans for free or reduced fee, I have been induced in the Texas State Bar Pro Bono College. Yet, I cannot help Andrew because I cannot beat the machine–the Texas Estates Code and probate bar.

Harris County “sold” Andrew in every sense of that word by imposing an illegal cost bond on Sharon that she could not pay. Simply for making a record of the illegal bond, I was threatened with jail 10+ times and intimidated. The person on the Legislative Committee who wrote the bond was Linda Goehrs, his own temporary guardian. His lawyer submitted her bill to be paid out of the $30,000 illegal bond, which escalated to $90,000 and his guardian, Goehrs testified that Harris County had insufficient funds to pay her bill. Randall Keith did not.

We lost before we ever filed. Guardianship was awarded to a disqualified child abuser and the Judge disqualified the qualified mother, a veriable expert in autism in my professional opinion as an expert–because Harris County has insufficient funds and Randall Keith did not. His lawyers, Fatima Breland, told us up front there be no experts because Sharon had no money. Andrew was the client she was supposed to zealously represent. Harris County had no money, so no interpreter was retained so that Linda and Fatima could understand what Andrew wanted in violation of his rights. The code mandates interpreters, but we had insufficient funds and the Ad litem, Fatima, placed her duty to zealously represent on me. Andrew was denied speech therapy, deemed medically necessary for him since age three–until the time of trial, by court appointed ad litems.

Linda Goehrs wrote the bond provision in the estates code and knew in 2012 it was not effective but she petitioned the Court to pay herself $30,000 to serve as Andrew’s guardian and submitted a further bill for $90,000. Judge Olsen screamed, “you can blame Candice Schwager when you are not paid $100,000″ and I suppose you can. Linda violated the rules for indigent disabled individuals and the Harris County fee guidelines and charged $375 per hour to learn on the job as I desperately fed her autism for 2 years hoping she would understand. I was not allowed to attend the special education meetings we demanded after seeing 7 years of neglect splashed through his educational record. It’s clear to me why now. Andrew was never declared incompetent because Harris County refused to fund experts and his ad litems would not even talk to my expert, a man with 50 years Board Certified Experience in Special Education and Psychology who designs special education schools and charges $700/hour as an expert–but worked for Andrew for free because of Andrew.

I had to work for free because Sharon could not stay in the case if I was paid, but managed to get one speech pathologist to testify speech was medically necessary. The family court ordered that the guardian give Andrew speech therapy, which his guardian refused to allow because, as she testified under oath, “I did not understand autism.” Too bad for Andrew, I suppose. Linda ended up quashing my subpoena to violate Andrew’s right to testify about his wishes. He wanted to be with his mother and made no secret of not wanting to even see his father again.

The Judge was not competent because he asked during the hearing “what is an ARD meeting?” I was left in the position of trying to qualify a board certified lawyer in probate who was incompetent to testify as an expert with an incompetent judge who never read Andrew’s educational and medical file since age 3, and unable to remove them, while also unable to qualify them because they were all incompetent. I was the expert under Rule 702 and my expert opinion is Sharon, his mother, was the expert of all of us. But Sharon was disqualified for money and the abusive thief was disqualified, but qualified for money.

Linda Goehrs did not read the summaries of 864 pages of Andrew’s medical records I provided or a two year stream of emails about child abuse, as I hoped against hope that a light bulb would turn on. She’s had 2 ½ years to do so. So did his lawyer, the attorney ad litem. Linda testified that she did not allow us to take Andrew to speech therapy because his incompetent abusive father said “it was a waste of time” and she “did not understand autism.” Linda committed crimes against Andrew by not providing medically necessary speech therapy, ordered by the family court judge. Apparently, she did not read the 10 years of family court files I sent to her and summarized. I gave her a pile of school and medical records 1 1/2 feet high and summarized them all. Were they read?

The Code says if a person is indigent, the County pays. When I begged that Section 665A be enforced and revealed the Legislative History, I was threatened with jail and then Judge Olsen stated on the record “Wouldn’t it be nice if Harris County had the money?” He denied my plea for a jury trial on the disqualification before he threw out mom and said I would not get a jury “because he was the ultimate arbiter of fact.”

I could not disqualify or qualify the attorney or temporary guardian because the judge never understood they weren’t qualified under the rules of evidence. And at the end of the day, I ended up representing Andrew and my client in a system that cared only about money and we had insufficient funds to beat the system. I lost and Andrew is a hostage because these reckless incompetent people think they are competent and have no idea what they have just done. I do and I am horrified. Now Sharon cannot file any more court actions or she will “never see Andrew again.”

When the case began, I prayed Charles Bearinger would stick with us. He volunteered pro bono when his rate is $700/hour. I offered him to Linda and Fatima and they did not call him on the phone or to trial. I could not call him because he was afraid to testify. Charles is Board Certified in Special Education and Psychology/Counseling with a combined total of more than 50 years of experience. The case was tragic and I fear for Andrew’s life because Randall once told his older son, who got away, “no one will hear you cry for help now.” Imagine Andrew’s nightmare.

Cause No. 380624; In the Guardianship of Willie Jo Mills, deceased, Harris County Probate Court 4

In December of 2013, I sought a TRO to save the life of Willie Jo Mills—notifying the Judge that death was imminent if the TRO was not granted. Willie Jo Mills died being starved with only spoonfuls of water as she was given morphine Haldol and Valium and died in hospice, when she had only a urinary tract infection. The reason? The guardian was incompetent and the Doctor had a conflict of interest. Dr. Guerini was bought out and almost lost his license for being loose with pills for cash. Dr. Guerini was the doctor who put Willie Jo in guardianship illegally with no due process, as the attorneys appointed to protect her signed a Rule 11 Contract stripping her of her rights and placing her in a lock down facility.

Dr. Guerini was the doctor who the guardian, David Dexel, used to try to place Willie Jo on hospice in 2012 when she only had a urinary tract infection. Guerini was the Doctor was her treating doctor at Emeritus but also had a side job as medical director of hospice. He placed Willie Jo in guardianship illegally with no jury’s finding of incompetency as she cried “why are you doing this to me?”

Willie Jo was dying for a drink. Willie Jo DIED WHILE THE COURT DENIED MY PLEAS TO HELP HER. I filed two TROs and three motions for a jury trial but after being threatened to get out, Sherry learned that speech is not free. Sherry happened to be present at the recusal hearing in Sharon Keith’s case. She was critical of the Judge, but fair. I don’t know if I will ever get over thinking that the affidavit she filed against Judge Rory Olsen to recuse him cost her Willie Jo. Sherry almost felt as if her mother’s death was intentional. Sherry was the expert when it came to her mother. But Sherry was disqualified for making people angry by making too much noise.

Dr. Guerini was called back in 2014 to finish the job and placed Willie Jo on hospice because of “family conflict,” rather than any illness. He said that on tape! Family conflict is the reason families lose their loved ones. Sherry was denied guardianship because of family conflict and her power of attorney was ignored. Willie Jo Mills was never evaluated by a physician who wasn’t biased against her for continued payments from her own money.

Lawyers made hundreds of thousands of her money to neglect and kill her. The Court signed an Order taking her millions into a Court created Section 867 Trust prior to the illegal rule 11 contract which placed her into guardianship against her will by the signatures of lawyers with a duty to oppose the guardianship. They would not honor the estate planning documents naming Sherry because of family conflict, but the person objecting was Sherry’s brother, who lacked standing to object by virtue of his theft of several hundred thousand from his mother’s estate prior to guardianship. Sherry sued him in district court and he was forced to return the money but the Court then seized it against Willie Jo’s rights as she cried for weeks, desperate to stop them.

The Judge knew this and ignored it, allowing the unqualified brother’s power of attorney to control, while blocking the caring daughters from access to information and their mother with threats of trespass if they rocked the boat. Willie Jo was taken to Methodist at which time medical records were shredded which stated what foods, liquids and medications she was given. Willie Jo had to sign herself into the Methodist Hospital as she was left with a note on her stomach from her guardian and Sherry by her side. The prior court coordinator of Probate Court 4 who was so incompetent, I have hardly ever witnessed a more reckless guardian being in charge.

I saw Willie Jo within days of her death and will never forget the feeling that she was blind. She was terrified and her eyes did not track my movements, so I quietly stepped away. I later learned that her official cause of death was multiple organ failure involving untreated diabetes, all of which puzzled everyone because she did not have diabetes. The pain of watching your mother die slowly and painfully is inconceivable but for watching it in Realtime.

Reports of abuse, exploitation and neglect were made to the Department of Aging and Disability, who has jurisdiction over assisted living facilities. It was at this time I learned that out of 78,000 Texas facilities, only 11-actions were pursued by the Attorney General, suggesting that Texas’ elderly were doomed without even knowing it.

Cause No. 415959; In the Guardianship Application of Ruby Peterson; transferred from the District Court of Harris County to Harris County Probate Court No. 1

In July of 2014, I filed an application for emergency TRO and Temporary Injunction to save the life of Ruby Peterson. After 4 days of testimony, establishing that she was being falsely imprisoned and assaulted via illegal chemical restraints (Seroquel, FDA black box warning), the injunction was summarily denied. The emergency that took Ruby’s life was Seroquel, which is NOT to be given to elderly patients with dementia—particularly if they had cardiac complications, which Ruby did. Despite my pleas, the Court ignored Ruby’s screams for help and she died January 2015 after being ill a mere three days. In the life of an elderly individual, three days can be fatal. I can hardly describe the emotional suffering her children have endured.

I was sickened to see lawyers sit around waiting to be paid after not even pretending to comply with their duties as ad litems. Jill Young, guardian ad litem and Russ Jones, attorney ad litem, read books and never even paid attention as the hearings which would decide the fate of a now dead mother–proceeded through 4 days. The expert retained by Sarah Pacheco, Dr. Chris Merkl, testified on the stand that he was retained to create a legal document stating that Ruby was incompetent (when the Code says she is presumed competent and the doctor admitted not knowing the law). Dr. Merkl testified that he “just gets together and DECIDES WITH SARAH PACHECO whether people are incompetent or competent, stating that a few occasions, Sarah had the idea that no guardianship was needed, so he found them competent and SARAH was perfectly happy with that. I have no doubt that was true but was shocked he admitted it under oath.

Our Doctor was extremely qualified and the Judge fought to not allow him to see Ruby, but reluctantly gave me a two hour window to get an expert with a huge practice from San Antonio to Houston and try to make the deadline. We did it and his report was phenomenal, revealing Ruby had cardiac insufficiency and would die if she did not get treatment. The Judge denied subsequent visits to follow up on Merkl’s gross negligence of not treating Ruby’s cardiac insufficiency, which caused her to fall and almost bust her skull at Silverado.

Silverado threatened me and my clients with federal crimes, requiring us to remove my blogs and videos of Ruby screaming for help from the internet–or my clients would not be able to see their mother again. The Sugarland Police threatened my clients with arrest for trespass for trying to rescue their mother, saying my clients could see their mother “when she’s dead.” Ruby’s lawyer threatened the only doctor who could save her life because he was going to ensure her heart was treated. She died surrounded by medical professionals exactly as we said she would.

Ironically, the daughter and son responsible for her death, Carol Ann Manley and David Peterson, knew that their mother fell and that her skull almost cracked at Silverado Senior Living. They also knew that their power of attorney gave them no authority to falsely imprison her, as did the Judge. Yet the Judge refused to “Let Ruby Go” and punished me with $15,000 sanctions for making too much noise. ,Dr. Merkl did a fellowship in Cardiology and testified he and Dr. Lalani were looking to see if the cause of Ruby’s confusion was her heart. Dr. Merkl knew too but was too busy creating legal documents and handing over his medical license to a lawyer, Sarah Pacheco. Why?

Ruby was never getting out. Ruby wanted to disown Sarah’s client, Ruby’s daughter, Carol Ann Manley, from inheritance. Carol Ann devised a scheme to lock her mother up at Silverado Senior Living until she died so that the Will could not be changed. My clients were threatened with arrest for trespass because Ruby was “their property” and we were trespassors in their mind. Ruby was presumed competent until proven uicompetent by a jury trial that never came and she died. Ruby was kidnapped and falsely imprisoned in the protection of the probate court and never determined incompetent. She was presumed competent by the law but the Judge refused to let her out.

Doctor Merkl should return to practicing medicine if the Medical Board does not strip him of all licensing. He is a doctor and never assessed Ruby’s competence because he and Sarah Pacheco “decided” Ruby was incompetent. The problem is that Sarah is board certified and the Doctor knew better, but violated the very code they tried to use to incarcerate her. The reason? Truth is irrelevant. Money is not. Merkl was not a member of the AMA, which is why he said all elderly should be locked up over 65 forever against their will and drugged illegally. Merkl also testified that it’s okay to lie to patients to get them to take dangerous psychotropic drugs that kill because the ends justifies the means.

Ruby was drugged by Seroquel, which is fatal for heart patients and denied a pacemaker which would have saved her life because apparently, that was not the goal. Ruby’s son David Peterson testified that “if you gotta lie, you gotta lie. Bill Clinton did it.” We tried to introduce the fraudulent Will David Peterson, Ruby’s son, admitted to probate, as he bragged to his sisters and brothers that he stole his cousin’s inheritance by having a disabled aunt with dementia change her will at 98 for $300. The Judge refused and we were accused of being on a witch hunt by Sarah Pacheco.

Ruby was kidnapped and assaulted with dangerous psychotropic drugs at Silverado Senior Living by CAROL ANN MANLEY AND DAVID PETERSON, with the help of Sarah Pacheco and Dr. Chris Merkl. RUBY PETERSON’s medical records (entered into evidence by her own lawyer) demonstrate false imprisonment and repeated assaults—crimes. Ruby was found screaming and crying to leave SILVERADO or drugged to the point of being passed out in her wheelchair.

Not once did any of DEFENDANTS’ five+ lawyers and guardian ad litems deem their crimes problematic! Russ Jones mocked Ruby as he entered her records and sealed her fate—and left for golf. Her lawyer never read the medical records he introduced into evidence against his own client, because they had instance after instance of falls for the low blood pressure and blood pressure low, high and everywhere because it was not regulated. Ruby’s lawyer was Board Certified and I was not. But Russ Jones only wanted to get paid. I wanted to help save Ruby’s life. I lost and was mocked throughout the entire proceedings. She died in 6 months and the Judge punished me $15,000 for too much publicity.

RUBY PETERSON DIED OF NEGLECT WHILE SURROUNDED BY MEDICAL CARE PROVIDERS. RUBY’S LAWYER threatened Dr. John Tennison, M.D. with arrest for trespass if he came on the premises again with not one shred of evidence that his refusal was reasonable–simply because he was the Dr. we brought and we were not going to win. The mediator suggested we file kidnapping and criminal false imprisonment charges–seeing the crimes. Why didn’t all of the “experts?”

Dr. Tennison was the only physician to deem RUBY’S cardiac problems important enough to follow up on but when he attempted to visit her, Dr. Tennison was threatened with arrest for trespass. Keeping Dr Tennison away probably killed her.How can experienced probate lawyers be so ignorant? RUBY PETERSON was a person in need of protection while in the protection of Harris County probate courts. RUBY was isolated in a predictably lethal combination of circumstances. Ironic is the fact that the entire system designed to protect RUBY killed her. Absurd results: the lawyer that Ruby told to hire was sanctioned for making too much noise to get her out of Silverado!

In re Lynn Paxton Guardianship, 2010; G-00204, In the Probate Court No. 2 of El Paso, County, Texas

This case is one of the most unbelievable cases I have ever had, but no less tragic. It has gone on for 6 years and is now in the appellate court because the Judge wrongfully dismissed my bill of review to free Lynn Paxton, incapacitated, from her exploiter, Terry Hammond. Terry Hammond is the one who started this nightmare in Texas as he ran through the legislature throwing Adult Protective Services under the Bus to build his empire of human trafficking to get rich while exploiting his own clients. Hammond is the former executive director of the national guardianship association. He has sold this nightmare to 38 States and is quoted by the media as some kind of hero. If they only knew. Terry Hammond is unqualified to serve because he serves himself, not the disabled people he is appointed to represent.

Terry’s scheme involves abusing the El Paso County Indigent Fund by lying about the funds and resources disabled wards have to “make” them appear indigent when they are not. In doing so, the County pays his exorbitant attorneys’ fees which he is now trying to hide by sealing cases of disabled and elderly “hostages” he keeps for profit. He manipulates the judiciary and bragged about getting the Honorable Judge Yvonne Rodriguez to lose an election so he can pick judges who will rule in his favor. Judge Rodriguez is now an honorable justice of the 8th Court of Appeals.

Hammond has sealed Lynn’s case to hide from me, a lawyer trying to help her, because he wants to hide his fee bills in violation of the Texas Public Information Act and Supreme Court Orders mandating fees be disclosed to the Office of Court Administration of Texas. Indigent fees will soon not be funded to counties if attorneys do not report and 40% are not reporting.

Hammond was hired by a woman whom I believe has mental problems in 2008, Miriam Lundy, to file guardianship over her father, George Paxton, deceased. Hammond knew it was not legitimate but filed the guardianship to stop George from moving his very disabled daughter out of a State Supported Living Center to El Paso–to be close to family. In doing so, Hammond sought to violate the Olmsted Act because the elderly and disabled have a right under Title II of the ADA to be integrated in the community with family and friends. After losing the TRO in Abeline to keep Lynne incarcerated for life, the guardianship in El Paso was dismissed by Hammond, proving he was manipulating the process and lying.

Terry Hammond non-suited the guardianship and neither Miriam, Terry, or any of the heirs currently trying to bankrupt my clients, Lorri and David Burnett, complained about the care Lynne, George, or his ailing wife Helene received–until they died and money became the objective. The Judge of Probate Court No. 2 certified that George was competent by renewing George’s guardianship of Lynne in 2011 after court investigator, Raquel Lauretano certified George was competent.

The heirs of Helene and Miriam, who was disowned by her father for stealing $85,000 from him, proven by Adult Protective Services, then sued the loving caretakers, Lorri Burnett and David Burnett and tried to extort them for every penny they have in malice. Whereas before the deaths of Helene and George, Lorri and David were praised for their amazing care of all three as they aged and needed more advanced care, suddenly once George and Helene died, Lorri and David became the targets to steal everything they own. Why? Lorri and David were convenient targets because they were not blood relatives.

Never mind the fact that the heirs treated Lorri like a sister for 45 years and helped design the nursing home environment that has become their home. Never mind the fact that George and Helene paid Lorri only a fraction of what they would have paid in a nursing home and she worked 24/7 taking care of three bed ridden people at one point. Never mind that every lawyer has admitted Lorri’s care was immaculate. The guardian who was pressured to remove Lynne from Lorri–causing 6+ years of suffering to Lorri because Lorri truly loved her angel, Lynne.

They want money and will commit extortion and a litany of federal and state crimes to forcibly take it from Lorri and David, believing they cannot lose. This is despite Lorri having years of training and advanced state certification to care for Lynne before she was ever permitted to leave the institution. Lynne has cerebral palsy and Helene, George’s wife had Alzheimer’s. George was just up in age and though he has never been deemed incapacitated, 19 lawyers have looted his estate as Lorri, David, Coleen Paxton (Lynne’s cousin), and I fight to save Lynne.

The same Judge who determined George was competent to remain Lynne’s guardian in 2011 now is considering taking the home Lorri and David bought in 2007 and bankrupting them–when no one has any evidence they ever did anything wrong. The Burnetts are in a nightmare that we cannot escape because the lawyers are extorting her to give up her home or face $150,000 in sanctions and costs, to stay in a case they cannot get out of because they are Defendants. They also seek a like amount in costs for the guardianship of Lynne Paxton, incapacitated, when Lorri was wrongfully kicked out of the guardianship of Lynne twice and is no longer a party. The true agenda is Terry’s attempt to pull the case out of the appeals court in a court that no longer has jurisdiction.

The title company is defending them, as am I and a board certified appellate Lawyer. An appellate attorney is fighting their efforts to rip the case out of the Court of Appeals with a cost bond after the plenary power of the trial court has expired. I am fighting with him and we are finally gaining some ground after 6 years.

Lynne is being exploited by her own lawyer who really works for Miriam Lundy, but is pretending to represent the best interests of the disabled person, Lynne. Lynne is the virtual prisoner of her exploiters and the family is threatened for trying to see her. The file is now sealed, which violates the Texas Public Information Act and Supreme Court Order mandating transparency in attorneys’ fees. No hearing was held to seal it. It was ex parte, like everything Terry does. Jury trials are denied and people are punished for trying to help their loved ones. The qualified are disqualified and disqualified are qualified.

Lynne is in the HCS program and her guardian, Lisa Lunceford, does not even know what that is. She waived the benefits for Lynne. Now that she sees the financial benefit and ability to exploit more elderly and disabled by the HCS waiver program, she is educating herself. But Lorri was the only person qualified to care for Lynne and Lorri is threatened with restraining orders for even trying to see Lynne or send a Christmas Card. Lorri is being blocked from helping others because they do not like her. People could be helped if the experts knew what they were doing and were not exploiting the people they were entrusted and have a duty to protect.

Judge Max Higgs said ithat Lynne Paxton should never have been removed from Lorri and David’s care. They were the most qualified, but were disqualified by Terry Hammond’s schemes to exploit Lynne. Terry Hammond is disqualified but was qualified by the system that exploits rather than protects. Lynne’s cousin, Coleen Paxton, has said she no longer believes in justice. I’m not sure I do either.

I have many more cases and people calling me from Florida, New York, and Georgia. My phone is ringing off the wall and I cannot help them because I don’t have funding and neither does Harris County. I am left fighting a battle I cannot win. I need your help.

The Senate is considering multiple bills to protect the disabled and elderly because the Texas Estates Code does not protect them. A hearing was held by Senator Joan Huffman Monday of the State Affairs Committee and victims of the guardianship program testified. Senator Huffman has vowed to do an interim study on guardianship. Get involved and help the elderly and disabled in this cause! Your loved one could be the next “cause number” in probate court and your personal nightmare will never end.

From Barbara Stone–a simple request to protect her mother

Joanne M Denison's avatarMaryGSykes.com

From: barbara stone
Sent: Mar 31, 2015 2:12 PM
To: Annette Del Aguila , Luis Pino , robertjordan@miamisao.com
Cc: Candice Schwager , JoAnne M Denison , “Peter Coen,Esq” , Mindy Marques , Adam Walser , Gary.fields@wsj.com, helpmehoward@wsvn.com, clue@wsvn.co, jjburdi@tribune.com, musgrave@pbpost.com, Janine Gibson , Stuart Millar , John.emshwiller@wsj.com, Michael.siconolfi@wsj.com, barbara.hollingsworth@cjonline.com, BNorman@wplg.com, scoop@huffingtonpost.com, chamby@publicintegrity.org, wkroustan@sunsentinel.com, raolmeda@tribune.com, mediarelations@publicintegrity.org, membership.inquiries@publicintegrity.org, contact@icij.org, investigations@icij.org, ediarelations@icij.org, drphil@drphil.com, ashby.jones@wsj.com, Jacob.Gershman@wsj.com, Janet Christensen Obrien , barbara stone
Subject: Helen Stone

I have repeatedly requested protection for my mother from the guardian predators who are abusing and drugging her.   My mother is being deprived of her life and it appears your office continues to abet her abuse.
My mother was admitted to the hospital TWICE last week.  What is being done by your office to protect her?
She was…

View original post 528 more words

From Barbara Stone–a simple request to protect her mother

From: barbara stone
Sent: Mar 31, 2015 2:12 PM
To: Annette Del Aguila , Luis Pino , robertjordan@miamisao.com
Cc: Candice Schwager , JoAnne M Denison , “Peter Coen,Esq” , Mindy Marques , Adam Walser , Gary.fields@wsj.com, helpmehoward@wsvn.com, clue@wsvn.co, jjburdi@tribune.com, musgrave@pbpost.com, Janine Gibson , Stuart Millar , John.emshwiller@wsj.com, Michael.siconolfi@wsj.com, barbara.hollingsworth@cjonline.com, BNorman@wplg.com, scoop@huffingtonpost.com, chamby@publicintegrity.org, wkroustan@sunsentinel.com, raolmeda@tribune.com, mediarelations@publicintegrity.org, membership.inquiries@publicintegrity.org, contact@icij.org, investigations@icij.org, ediarelations@icij.org, drphil@drphil.com, ashby.jones@wsj.com, Jacob.Gershman@wsj.com, Janet Christensen Obrien , barbara stone
Subject: Helen Stone

I have repeatedly requested protection for my mother from the guardian predators who are abusing and drugging her.   My mother is being deprived of her life and it appears your office continues to abet her abuse.
My mother was admitted to the hospital TWICE last week.  What is being done by your office to protect her?
She was rushed out of the hospital the first time in less than 2 days in order that Jacqueline Hertz, Blaire Lapides, Roy Lustig, Michael Genden and Alan Stone could return her to the nursing facility warehouse where she is being caged and continue their financial extortion.
My mother was readmitted the following day because of ongoing aggravated abuse and neglect.  The same illiterate, unfit, unqualified “aides” who caused her admission continue their attempts on her life.  Hertz and Lapides use “caretaker” agencies that are grossly unfit to handle the needs of an elderly person – I have notified your office the “caretakers” are part and parcel of the abuse and must be removed from my mother’s care.  They need to be replaced by qualified English speaking RNs who are licensed and hired from a top notch agency.  Please let me know how I can facilitate in that regard.
I would again like to point out that my involvement in the criminal court was the result of a corrupt “probate” court who caused my false arrest in order to engage in their embezzlement of my mother’s assets in secrecy.  Her assets have almost been drained by this enterprise and still lives in a caged lock down filthy facility where she is drugged and abused
The “court” hands my allegations of abuse back to the abusers.  The abusers stop at nothing to remove my eyes from their enterprise so just like child molesters. they can engage in their operation in secrecy.  This enterprise has substituted their state actors, attorneys, illiterate “aides” and these corrupt guardians as my mother’s family.  This charade is so brazen that it is becoming extremely tiresome that your office continues to go along with this openly lawless operation.
I am again referring you to  the film “Eyes on Predator Guardians” produced by Janet Christensen Obrien that exposes this operation.  This film has been ranked by IMDb and is part of an ongoing series of programs exposing the criminal guardianship enterprise.  It can be found by googling the film and producer’s name.
The media is aghast by your office keeping me on false “house arrest” for saving my mother’s life and exposing this corrupt enterprise.  It is a public relations nightmare for your office.  My mother is in the hospital TWICE because of abuse, and shamelessly the state attorney is still engaged in this charade and keeping me from my 87 year old mother who is being killed by criminals, Jacqueline Hertz, Blaire Lapides, Roy Lustig, Alan Stone and Michael Genden.  The state attorney appears to have a policy of abetting the genocide of  elderly vulnerable residents of Dade County and the state of Florida.
Jose Arroyo indicated he would not be involved in the investigation because of the doctor involved.   This will request a written confirmation to that effect and that I be informed of the special prosecutor who is in charge of the investigation.
This will further request:
– a copy of your prosecutorial procedure for the investigation of elder abuse.
– the protocol you are following to insure my mother ‘s safety.
– the status of the investigation and the status of the subpoena for my mother’s records
-investigation transparency.
Sincerely,
Barbara Stone

From My Reply Brief to the ARDC – 60 points the Trubunal Got Wrong

While the Tribunal argues that I am lying, here are 60 points they got wrong:

EXHIBIT B – 60 FACTS THE ARDC GOT WRONG (NOTE THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THEY DO THIS–SEE THE 60 POINTS FROM KEN DITKOWSKY’S CASE)

Item    Page    Got it wrong…
1.        5    ¶ 2.  Administrator fails to mention that CT filed a petition when she was accused by Mary of swiping $4,000 out of one of her bank accounts.  ARDC fails to mention the handwritten letter from Mary telling her that she wants Carolyn to stop it with her “old tricks”. Where is that information?
2.        5    Fails to mention that CT alleged Mary suffered from dementia and memory loss.  Offer of Proof (see ROA) from Scott Evans testifies that Mary was playing canasta in a local card group at the time and beating the pants off everyone (fall of 2009).  It also fails to mention she was declared incompetent by Dr. Shaw who never actually met with her, in derogation of the Illinois Probate Act requiring examination by a licensed MD.
3.        6    Whatever was filed, Mary’s home with a lot of approx. 75 by 200′ in depth in a desirable neighbohood, Norwood Park was likely worth $1 million.  It was appraised at $700k in Jan. 2012 and sold in Feb. For $213k.
4.        6    ¶ 1.  Fails to mention that Gloria Sykes held last POA and the GAL’s blocked that POA and so did Judge Connor. Judge Connor constantly told Gloria that the POA was not important until the day Mary was guardianized and then she told Gloria it was “too late” to bring it up–a typical game on the 18th floor.  One day it’s too early and the next it’s too late.  See, c.f. Sophie Reichert case.  Same ploy by court
5.        6    IPA makes it clear that Mary’s wishes have to be followed unless and until it is shown that they are unreasonable.  None of this happened.  Illinois is a sliding scale guardianship case.  Mr. Splitt ignores that law.
6.        6    ¶ 2.  Stern and Farenga did not split fees.  Mary’s home was sold, about $80k was netted and Farenga, Stern and Schmeidel took that money.
7.        6    ¶ 4, Gloria filed a counter petition in case a guardian was appointed.  There has to be a reason stated and it does not say she agreed with the court’s assessment, only that there were allegations of dementia and memory loss.  In addition while it says “Gloria was represented” her counsel quickly withdrew because “he did not want to get involved in this case, they would sell Mary’s home and possessions and use it for attorneys fees and she would be left with CT, whom she did not want to live with.  Atty Dolgin was right. He was never subpoenaed by the ARDC, but was on the witness list.  This is evidence of a cover up in the Sykes case. The witnesses are not fair and balanced. They are carefully culled and selected.  Mary was actually doing fine with Gloria as her POA.
8.        7    Top of page. The $1 million in valuable coins is not listed because Gloria did not know of the value of the coins. Ken Ditkowsky was Mary and Charles’ Sykes estate attorney and the value of the coins is/was part of his business records–records the ARDC conveniently never subpoenaed and never deposed Ken D. about.
9.        7    Dr. Mar Amdur, like Shaw, is part of the “cottage industry” in probate.  He did not examine Mary either but declared her incompetent. See her video (which the ARDC tribunal refused to watch) on Vimeo by searching Mary Sykes.
10.        7    The disqualification was bogus. It was taken up on appeal and the same Justice that denied all of Gloria’s appeals denied this one.  How random is that?  Respondent was never called to be a witness.  Had she been called she would have pointed to the vimeo evidence she already posted.  Mary was competent enough to choose Gloria as her POA and she had that right.
11.    `    8    top of page. Gloria was clearly the last POA for health care and should have been chosen.  To invalidate a POA you have to have notice and a hearing.  None of that was done.  CT was appointed in derogation to the Illinois POA act. The ARDC never investigated the lack of hearing, due process or violations of Mary’s and Gloria’s human and civil rights. They did what they wanted.  Mr. Splitt’s statement ignores the Ill. POA Act and does not mention it.
12.        8.    Discussion regarding Peter Schmeidel and his “talents.” The ARDC is invited to investigate the case of LGV, which he was involved with, where the person met with Dr. Shaw on a Friday and was guardianized on Monday with out notice, summons or complaint properly served.  Her home was sold and estate drained. She lived on the streets for 2 years and begged the OPG for money and food, but they told her she had to go live in a locked down nursing home where she would be drugged and most likely killed.  She files complaints with the ARDC and they dismiss them out of hand and never investigate. Today the estate of a bungalow ($250k) and bank account ($150k) is drained and she lives in poverty. Good going there, Mr. Schmeidel.  Most of her money went to attorneys fees and fees of people and businesses she did not want in her life.  To date, she is furious.  Mr. Splitt does not mention this complaint.
13.        8    Bottom of page. This is a common ploy in probate with the attorneys.  If the ward does not have enough money for lavish attorneys fees, make up a false claim and get it from another relative (Steven Schwartz case and Miriam Solo, Michael Hubbard and Janie Thomas–cases the ARDC does NOT investigate).  The entire paragraph is a lie.  A furor was created in Judge Stuart’s testimony when asked by Respondent “is it true you chained Gloria in your ante room and had her pets threatened with euthanization”.  Stuart: “No, I would never do that.”  Courtroom goes into a panic.  A few more benign questions, then “how many times have you chained a family member in your ante room.”  Stuart: “You know, that was the first ti—, let me change that, I never chained anyone in my ante room.”  Yeah right. She knows it, you know it, and even PS and AS bragged later to Judge Hollis what you did in chaining Gloria on a ND Ill transcript.  Does the ARDC investigate? Never and of course. 6 weeks later, Tim Evans would call Judge Stuart in his office and then she would announce she was “suddenly retiring” in 2 days.  Does Mr. Splitt address this or investigate it, certainly not.  Chaining any civil litigant is a flagrant Abuse of Power.  Judge Stuart had other means.
14.        8     top of page.  Gloria was allowed to ask limited questions and it was clear at hearing the elderly sisters had not been notified that Mary was to be guardianized.
15.        8    POA of Mary says she wanted to live in her home until she died.  Mr. Splitt forgets this.  Mr. Splitt does not even mention the video on Vimeo of Mary clearly indicating her wishes. Respondent will be glad to play that during the hearing it is only 10 minutes long.  Judge Garber said it clearly indicated Mary’s competence.
16.        8    The determination by Judge Stuart that any money belonged to Mary was plain wrong and she knew it at the time. Gloria owned 6016, it was her home that suffered ice damming one winter and by fall it suffered a massive black mold outbreak due to shoddy repairs.  Only Gloria paid for the insurance, only Gloria’s name was on the insurance  Mary’s name was added to the home title for testamentary purposes only.  Mary’s name was added immediately prior to settlement for res judciata purposes only.  Mary had her own attorneys in the Lumberman’s case and with Center of Concern in Park Ridge.  Mr. Splitt skips over all of those facts–facts published on the blog.  Only Gloria suffered breast cancer due to the black mold the insurance company grew in her home.  Any claims by Mary are specious.  Mary had her own home at 6014.  She had insurance and her personal possessions there.  To date, 6016 lies in ruins. The insurance money was to repair the home.  Chase sold the mortgage to Fannie Mae and put the property in foreclosure but Gloria has stayed the case because Fannie Mae  is in receivership with home mortgages and only the receiver can approve a foreclosure, which it has not.  Mr. Splitt again neglects these points and does not discuss them.
17.        9    Notice of hearing to guardianize. There is no certificate of service in the file to either of Mary Sykes, or her two elderly sisters Josephine DePietro or Yolanda Bakken.  Neither filed an appearance.  Neither was represented by counsel.  Again, Mr. Splitt skips the important facts.  Soldini requires actual notice, not wishful notice.  There is no evidence either sister was actually served with anything in that file, and in fact neither was in fact service with the requisite 14 day advance notice to take jurisdiction of the case.  Gloria has filed some appeals on that–all turned down by Justice Bernstein who apparently does not get cases on a random basis.
18.        10    Peter Schmeidel denies “churning fees” (his name is not mentioned in the blog statement, is Mr. Splitt telling the Review Board and Respondent something they do not know, that Mr. Schmeidel is in fact behind a quest for all attorneys to churn fees in the case?  Mr. Schmeidel testifies that he has $200k in fees, but puts in a petition for $100k in the court records.  What is the discrepancy?  Mr. Splitt does not answer that question.
19.        10    The $100k amount is wrong.  The amount taken from Gloria to pay Mary’s attorneys fees is $200k.  Further, Mary lives at her daughter’s.  She had complete health insurance, being a CPD widow, and she had SSI and the CPD pension of her husband, approx. $2500 per month.  Mr. Splitt does not mention this or acknowledge it. What is CT doing with that money every month?  And why do duplicate credits show up on CT’s accounting under insurance?  Is that insurance fraud?  Medicare fraud?  Why does not the ARDC investigate when Gloria reports it?
20.        10    ¶ 2.  Cynthia Farenga. Why does CF insist Mary needs funds when in fact she lives with CT and has her own income of $2500. Why did not the ARDC subpoena the bank for the safe deposit records containing the approx. $1 million in gold coins.  CF never put in or showed a fee petition. She took the funds out of the trust selling the home, but the court already warned (this disappeared from a transcript one day), not to commingle the trust with the estate or the trust would come into the estate for accounting purposes.  Nonetheless, the monthly mortgage on the house in the trust was always paid from estate funds by the Guardian, CT.
21.            10    bottom of page.  Same questions as item 20 for CF. Why are the fees the same? Why was there no fee petition?  Why does not the ARDC investigate? Even more important, why does not the ARDC dispute the fact that the testimony for AS and CF show that over 4 years they took out over $30k in fees from the trust, but only saw Mary for minutes (less than an hour) in all that time? (Emphasis added).  See their testimony on transcript.

22.        11    Why doesn’t Dorothy Brown put up publicly the images of all documents?  Don’t those belong to the public?  Why is she hiding them?  Why is it when you go to law division you can’t print documents from other divisions?  Why doesn’t she put them up when the printers often don’t work in law, chancery or probate divisions?  A 12 year old could hack this stuff and put it up.
23.        11    ARDC does not counter money grubbing attorneys.  But the ARDC does not publish any figures, any statistics of who, what and when bills these large estates.  The court system keeps everything in its files and charges of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees for large estates go unanswered. There is no transparency, accountability, ratings, etc. of any fee billed to an estate. As noted above, the attorneys, GAL’s and others come from “secret lists” not available to the public. These attorneys have no Google ratings and they are not yelped by the families forced to use them, or the wards forced to use them.
24.        12    Judge Stuart cannot refuse to go over Gloria’s claims of lack of jurisdiction, which she did in fact refuse–all the time.  When jurisdiction is brought up, at any time, whether first day of the case, 10th day of the case or 100th day of the case, it must be seriously considered.  When brought up on 1st or 10th appeal it must be seriously considered.  This Judge Stuart did not do.  Judge Stuart denies corruption but has to chain a civil litigant.  She then denies jurisdiction has to be addressed each time it is brought up.  She curtails Mary’s guardianship proceeding and does not care about notice or service upon Mary or her elderly sisters.  This is similar to Clinton saying “I did not have sex with that woman” because what he did was not sex–in his mind only.
25.        12    While Stern and Farenga deny corruption and ignoring Gloria, what do you call it when the court has no jurisdiction and Mary was not served.  Not the ARDC, CF or AS or PS or HW can explain how Mary got served by a Cook County Sheriff when she was living in Naperville and why Exhibit A which goes into great depths on how there was no service, was never countered at trial by any of these actors.
26.        12    Rolling eyes, strike pleadings, cutting off Gloria, ignoring what Gloria and her attorneys had to say, all not countered by the ARDC.
27.        13    ¶ 2, Judge Stuart denies a cover up, but then why is Mary guardianized without notice to sisters, or service of summons and complaint? Why did Judge Stuart testify she was never told CT drilled out safe deposit box without a court order–a court order which is necessary to obtain before touching jointly held assets.
28.        13    PS testifies there were no exparte communications, but there is in fact on every door to the judge’s private areas a sign saying “staff and judges only.”  Gloria and Scott frequently complained of PS, AS and CF going in and out those doors.  They said it happened “all the time.”  So why didn’t the ARDC subpoena tapes in the court room and out the hallways and when Respondent subpoenas those tapes her FOIA requests are not returned?  Interesting.
29.        15    PS denied he or the GAL’s were fraudulently taking money, but what about others?  Why are they covering up instead of serving subpoenas and discovery?  Isn’t that their jobs?  KD has business records indicating valuable coins.  Gloria, Kathie and Yolanda confirm hearing of this.  No GAL or probate atty questions CT or serves her with a supoena or deposition. Also, why did the ARDC quash subpoenas for the bank records?
30.        16    “Corruption reaches the highest levels” does not just mean the ARDC.  It is now becoming apparent that mortgage payoffs of certain judges are coming from known mobsters and that info will be coming out shortly.  In addition, the Tribunal and ARDC ignore the letter to Gloria regarding her complaints that “AS is her guardian”–a veiled threat. Who investigated that and why did it take weeks before the ARDC issued a retraction.
31.        16.    Judge Evans refused to allow her to blog with a computer, not just in general. The ARDC does not mention the fact that everyone is allowed under relevant US Supreme Court law to take notes in court. What difference does it make if it’s a pen and paper or with a computer.  And the bailiffs often stop people from even taking notes with a pen and paper, let alone a computer.  Of course, even assuming a computer were recording, what difference would that make unless you were a miscreant who liked changing transcripts.  Computers and note taking are freely allowed in the ND Ill. Courts but not in the circuit courts. Again, the difference is if someone needs to have a transcript fudged you can’t do that when someone else is making an honest recording.
32.        17.    Respondent has the right to tag postings as she desires and is necessary. While one judge refusing to allow blogging and computers is a story, many others experiencing the same thing and also finding corruption (deviation from law, morals or ethics) now becomes litigation and a clear and obvious trend.  By tagging a post with “corruption” it allows internet users to band together and to make a formidable group of those that are denied their constitutional right to free and open and democratic courts.
33.        34.    “Scary shades of Greylord” is a feeling. Respondent has a right to blog her own feelings.
35.        18    AS testified that he never changed the order in question, but the ARDC does not investigate at all the who, when, why and how of the order being changed and double stamped.  Peter Pan didn’t come and do it. The Order being scratched out in portions and double stamped speaks for itself.
36.        18    No other judge had discussed or ruled on the issue of jurisdiction to that date.  Mr. Splitt skips over the part where Respondent went downstairs, had all of the prior orders printed out and challenged all the attorneys where there was any finding of fact or motion on jurisdiction.  PS put his head down and ran out the court.  AS denied the challenge and CF wasn’t there.
37.        18    Respondent’s blog is now up to about 80,000 views and is very popular with no complaints.
38.        20    While Kathie would not know of churning or over charging, PS testified to over $200k in fees over 4 years and never met Mary.  Gloria and Scott considers that an outrage and so does most of the general public.
39.        20    Kathie Bakken testifies that important evidence was ignored.  Kathie did not use the term “railroading” Jay Dolgin did.
40.        21    Evidence in Mitigation. Mr. Splitt fails to state that both Ken and Bev gave glowing reports on how hard Respondent works and how she helps so many probate court victims on a daily basis, whether they have money or not.  The reports were glowing, not just factual, and Mr. Splitt never says that Ken Cooper compared her to “A Man without Season”
41.        21    It is very intellectually dishonest for CF to complain about being sued over a civil rights dispute when every day, and in Mary’s case she sues and guardianizes so very many victims.  Since she complains of a “detrimental effect” by filing a lawsuit, then why did she do what she did to Mary?  Why is she even a lawyer when lawyers sue people for a living.  She guardianizes Mary but spends minutes with her.  Respondent spends hours with the Sykes family, years seeing Mary in the neighborhood and then decides to sue CF for ruining Mary’s rights and her own civil rights.
42.        Fn3, p21    “Frivolous lawsuits” is not well founded.  Little to no case law was mentioned in either suit upon dismissal. In the copyright suit perhaps 10,000 copies were made, of not just Respondent’s creative works, but those of dozens of other authors that write for a living and who were unhappy with the ARDC copying their works (Sykes, Phelan, etc.)  In the civil rights suit, it is proposed that under the Loving case, the ARDC has no jurisdiction to regulate blogs concerning public matters and corruption, esp. when the ARDC is part of a code of silence and the coverups themselves, as noted by dozens and dozens of letters ignoring valid citizen complaints (Sykes, Gore, Bedin, Wyman, etc.)
43.        22    PS is disingenous he has no way to counter what is said of him on the blog. The blog has a comments section.  He has been repeatedly asked to go on Cooper’s Corners (a local cable show) to explain his actions. He is NOT a judge.  He can defend himself.  He has most likely 7 years of college. He is not a disabled person.  He blames Respondent and others (Probate Sharks, Nasga, etc.) for his lousy reputation in the marketplace but he has a remedy–do some good works and then have people click on them and he can repair the horrid things he has done.  He just chooses not to do anything good in his life. ( personal opinion).  So it is by his own choice all the criticisms (and not just Respondent) of his past behavior rise to the top of the internet search engines.  He needs to take responsibility for his own karma he himself created over the years.
44.        22    Respondents blog causes “unnecessary court time and satellite litigation.”  1) PS has no evidence of that and Gloria states openly she does her own litigation and 2) we do not yet live in a police state where the powers that be can claim “blame the media” and “shoot the messenger” when they don’t like media content.
45.        22    PS claims the real Lumberman’s money belonged with Mary because he had outstanding legal fees, just like Michael Hubbard in the Janie Thomas case and Miriam Solo in the Steven Schwartz case.
46.        22    Judge Stuart claims “Mary needed money” but all will go to attorneys fees.  Mary had income of $2500 per month and lived with CT.  She had 100% health insurance. What money did she need?  Gloria took care of her for 10 years and never went into court asking to sell her home or liquidate bank accounts.  Why suddenly Stuart, Farenga, Stern and PS “need money” for Mary when in fact, 100% has gone and will go to attorneys fees over her $2500 per month income.
47.        23    Again Mr. Splitt, does not tell the whole truth. Gloria has a therapy dog Shaggy and was going to bring him to see Mary.  Mary loves the dog.  Gloria wrote her name on the sign in sheet as “Sykes”.  The police aren’t even allowed to delete photos. Likely AS requested it, a gross violation of Respondent’s rights and Mary and Gloria’s rights, but the ARDC never investigated that.  The footage would should high level cognitive thinking on Mary’s part. AS wanted it destroyed. Mr. Splitt did not check the law, he does not protect anyone’s civil or human rights.  He helps the ARDC cover up such violations.  Mr. Splitt also does not mention that Respondent asked Mary if it was okay to video her and she gave consent.  Employees watched videos and pictures being taken for 35 minutes and no one said anything.  Mr. Splitt is not being honest about the transcript. He needs to try honesty for a change.
48.        24    Interestingly, Mr. Splitt decides that Vig is a mob term. Why does his brain go that way?  VIG is shown in all caps because it is an acronym for “Very Important Gain.”  It is not just a loan shark term.  Respondent does not speak Russian and is not part of any mob family. Is Mr. Splitt?
49.        24-25    Resondent did not investigate the OPG fires with the police department or the fire department or some law firm.  Why would she do that? It is clear from the comment she recalls them herself from Suntimes and Tribune articles.  The ARDC does not counter they could not find the articles themselves. They are there. They don’t want to look.
50.        25-26    The conclusions of “false statements” are not made with any proof. The ARDC can’t even respond to Exhibit A, which is, where is the jurisdiction in the case of Mary Sykes and why do they cover up repeatedly discovery of the gold coins? The recommendation to suspend is also baseless.  There is no evidence of failure to follow rules.  The Respondent wanted to email, as the Ilinois Supreme Court now recommends and use fax communications. The ARDC wants to run a trial like it is 1960.  This is just not done any longer.  Attorneys share files on Gdrive, Drop Box, Boxbe and others. Attorneys cooperate. The ARDC attorneys at every turn impede progress and technology. They refuse electronic filings in favor of paper which ruins trees and the environment on a massive scale and promotes pollution and a decay of the earth.  Respondent wants no part of that. It is irresponsible and short sighted.
Simply because there is a dispute between the ARDC and Respondent (who is a practicing patent attorney and has a degree in engineering) and the ARDC which has none of that, does not mean that her behavior is inapropriate.
There is absolutely no basis to suspend Respondent for 3 years and dozens of her clients will be left without probono or low cost counsel.
Will the ARDC and the Ill.Sup. Ct find these clients pro bono counsel?  Mr Splitt does not seem to care these are mainly probate vicitms who have suffered grave injustices.  The respondent fully intends to send each and every one of them to Mr. Larkin and Mr. Splitt and ask THEM to help these people out, without pay or expectation of pay.
51.        27    Waiver of argument and facts.  As shown by this Exhibit, Mr. Splitt and the ARDC have waived at least 51 facts they got wrong. They also clearly ignore the law and cite hearing administration cases and low level non appellate cases over and over, which they know they are not supposed to do.  Respondent only cited appellate court cases.  Everything respondent has mentioned is well known and citable. Further, the behavior of the Tribunal to the members of the public and Respondent herself was so scathing and condescending, the Review Board should find the transcripts of proceedings mandatory reading.  The ARDC has met no burden of researching and following the law itself.  The public is furious with the behavior of the ARDC in recent years.  The ARDC ignores this.
52.        29    The ARDC misreads the following cite: “judges are presumed to be impartial.”  Note, the word is ‘impartial” and not “infallible”.  The ARDC reads the conduct of judges to be conclusively “infallible” when they clearly are not. The media is ablaze with the Pennsylvania “Kids for cash” scheme, judges investing in prisons schemes and all sorts of unethical acts of judges acting badly across the nation. What the ARDC attorneys should take of note is that they seem to believe they have absolute immunity and that they too will be infallible in future litigation.  But a recent 2nd circuit decision just told the “kids for cash” judges and attorneys there will be no immunity for them.  Being a felon is not part of the job of being an attorney or judge.  Judges Stuart and Kowamoto are gone, suddenly retired. Judge Quinn is currently running a probate case outside the 120 window allocated by the legislature for temp guardianships.  No, they are not infallible.
53.        31    last para. “Judges Connors and Stuart were presumed to have acted properly.  See all the probate blogs, talk to Ken and Bev Cooper and all the probate victims mentioned above.   Ask them.  Again, the presumption concept is not accepted by everyone, and especially not by the myriad of probate victims and blogs out there.
54.        32    No objectively reasonable basis for Respondent’s statements is a bit premature. Note there are already 53 points the Tribunal got wrong.  The investigation is ongoing. The bank records of many judges have not been investigated.  Stuart is gone. Kowamoto is gone. Why otherwise would these judges one day get up and leave suddenly?  The investigations are not over and the ARDC refuses to help out.  The public is outraged and not protected and the ARDC ignores it.
55.        33    ARDC cites again “attorney’s offensive and profane language” is not the issue. Also “resort to epithets or personal abuse” is also not the issue.  Claiming judge was biased because he was paid by the state is also not the issue.
56.        35    Palmissano, who repeatedly yelled and screamed at judges is not a case that shows the issue herein
57.        36    Martin-Trigona making profane and defamatory statements to the ARDC is not the issue.
58.        36    Then the ARDC finally and begruginly cites SCOTUS cases, but clearly does not read them all or is familiar with the facts.  In the Citizens United case a scathing and ridiculous movie was issued right before elections about the Clintons.  SCOTUS said that was okay and protected by the First Amendment.  The ARDC says neither Alvarez, Brown, Ashcroft, Snyder, Citizens or McCutcheon involves attorneys, but obviously they didn’t read the cases.  At least TWO attorneys were involved in the production of the Hillary movie (Ann Coulter and another attorney) and the US Supreme Court said it was okay and no disciplinary actions were brought against either attorneys. Further, likely the video game company either had an attorney on staff, or hired one to protect its violent video games.  No one went after that attorney either.
59.        37    The ARDC cites Gentile, but the Gentile court found the attorney had the right to make statements about a case ongoing before a jury.
60.        38    The ARDC neglects to mention the fact that no one in particular has been accused of any crime or corruption. Rather, all the Respondent has done is asked, begged and cajoled the ARDC and the authorties to investigate the Mary Sykes case.  No one knows what is going on. The ARDC, rather than protecting the public and victims, protects the miscreants. They create a code of silence, quash subpoenas, fail to take depositions and investigate when they should do so, and make the public and victims furious with numerous reply letters which dismiss valid citizen complaints out of hand on a regular basis. They do not Ethics Report as required and their public property records are highly questionable and they refuse to answer valid questions from concerned citizens and the news media.  Almost all other Ill. State agencies publish salaries and require Ethics Reporting. The ARDC does not do this.  THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ARDC MUST THEREFORE BE REVERSED.

From Atty Barbara Stone–another warning about the huge use of psychotropic drugs in nursing homes

And today this post is dedicated to Alan Frake and his son Gary Frake. Alan is being drugged at Sunrise and his son says he can barely speak or lift his head.  Once a vibrant, strong, outspoken and active man, in a guardianship he was quickly put in a wheelchair with undiagnosed hip pain (fall in nursing home soon after coming there?), where he was drugged and drooling with dilated eyes in days.

For weeks and numerous court appearances the opposing counsel probate attorneys (Cary Peck and Ted Rhodes) denied the abuse, then we received a report confirming the drugging with psychotropic drugs. They are obviously used as a restraint.

Barbara Stone brings this to my attention:

http://www.wtw-law.com/unregulated-use-antipsychotic-drugs-nursing-home-facilities/

from a California lawyer.  In Illinois, Lea Black, Melissa Smart and Sharon Opryszek and Jerome Larkin would discipline this attorney–for telling the truth.  That chemical restraints ARE used in nursing homes routinely, the sales records are there but the ARDC does nothing, even when attorneys know of this. Does Himmel (an Illinois case mandating that lawyers report unethical conduct by other lawyers) even apply to seniors or nursing homes or probate courts? Where is the exception for those too old or disabled to speak up for themselves. Use of unwanted and non FDA approved drugs is nothing but battery.  How do the nursing homes and probate attorneys get away with these gross violations of human and civil rights and violations of international treaties against torture (isolation and chemical restraints)

Everytime the son Gary comes to court, the attorneys rush to the bar to tell all sorts of defamatory stories and fables. But drugs and prescriptions don’t lie.

Then Judge Quinn hands back the allegations of abuse back to the abusers.  Who does that?  Answer:  it happened in Carol Wyman (held down and shot up with halodol right in front of John Wyman when she wanted to go home, which was her right) and of course the deaths recently at the Hillside nursing home.  Then there are the cases

I am begging and imploring again, that coroners start to do tox screens for the elderly they see that show any signs of dehydration and malnutrition among the elderly.  These conditions are not normal.  I applaud the Hillside coroner for doing a tox screen on someone that died after apparently being assaulted with morphine and vicodin–both not needed by the patient other than as a chemical restrain.

And please, when funeral directors see signs of abuse, those HAVE TO BE FORWARDED TO CORNORERS. It is my understanding that evidence of abuse on a dead body must be reported to the State of Illinois, but nothing is ever done with these reports.

I want to know, why is that?

joanne

From Ken Ditkowsky — When will the Ill. Supreme Court start protecting the elderly and end the probate court cottage industry?

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Apr 1, 2015 10:50 AM
To: Elaine Renoire , Probate Sharks , Tim NASGA , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Matt Senator Kirk , Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (”
Subject: Fw: [Elders Against Guardianship] http://www.flsenate.gov/media/videoplayer?EventID=…

The video of the proceedings in the Florida Legislature are most encouraging.   
 
The major problem that I see with so much of the governmental help that we receive is Intellectual dishonesty.
 
It was very clear when I first became involved with the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois that a word that was not in their lexicon was “intellectual honesty.”      When I was punished by a four year suspension of my law license because I asked for an HONEST  investigation of the railroading of disabled and elderly people into guardianships so that they could be deprived of their liberty and their life savings[1], I realized that I was observing the nadir of the legal profession that was memorialized in literature.     As I watched the antics of Jerome Larkin, Lea Black, et al I could not help but be reviled by the cesspool of corruption that they acted in concert with and openly and notoriously aided and abetted.     The Bill of Rights was just a technicality and statutes that were inconvenient were ignored so that they could contribute the War on the Elderly and the Disabled.
 
Many Illinois citizens complained to the IARDC concerning the ‘elder cleansings’ and were rebuffed.      The over-paid under educated lawyers were disinterested in the statute authorizing guardianship or its limitation, to wit:
 
Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations. 
755 ILCS 5/11a-3
 
Larkin, Black, et al could have cared less.     42 USCA 12203 did not apply to them.   The reasoned that the Illinois Supreme Court had made each of them ‘superman’ and no subject to the Rule of Law.    Ergo, they were ‘gods’ in their own right.    I asked during my hearing if I was repentant for writing my complaint to the Attorney General of the United States.   18 USCA 4.     I was not and said so.   
 
What is disturbing is that Larkin knows that he is assaulting the First Amendment and he continues his ultra vires actions as if the Rule of Law ceased to exist.    Well knowing the immunity of 730 ILCS 20/4 and the 47 USCA 230 Larkin prosecutes JoAnne Denison for writing a blog that is critical of the ‘elder cleansers.’     On April 10, 2015 at 9:30 am, 130 E Randolph in Chicago he has scheduled a hearing for Denison to argue the appeal of the bogus and kangaroo proceeding that he previously orchestrated.      Even though an independent panel would have, after reading the documents, dismissed the proceedings against Ms. Denison and requested that the prosecutor, Mr. Larkin and the prior panel be disciplined because of their total disregard of the Constitutions of the State of Illinois and the United States of America, to date, Larkin and company have repeatedly dismissed gross human and civil rights abuses as  mere “technicalities” and they appear to have a great amount of protection to dismiss the public outcry to simply do their jobs and end the cottage industry of elder cleansing.
 
The extra-judicial actions of miscreants such as Larkin send a chill though any optimism that is engendered by the Florida Legislation and the good feelings that are expressed.     Let me explain.  Every state has some limitation just like the Illinois statute quoted supra.      In Indiana the Statute spells out who (other than minors) is to be subjected to a guardianship.
Incapacitated person” means an individual who:
·         (1)  Cannot be located upon reasonable inquiry;
·         (2)  Is unable:
o    (A)  To manage in whole or in part the individual’s property;
o    (B)  To provide self-care; or
o    (C)  Both;
o    because of insanity, mental illness, mental deficiency, physical illness, infirmity, habitual drunkenness, excessive use of drugs, incarceration, confinement, detention, duress, fraud, undue influence of others on the individual, or other incapacity; or
·         (3)  Has a developmental disability (as defined in IC 12-7-2-61).      Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 29-3-1-7.5
 
 
The appointment of a guardian with complete and unfettered powers should be relatively rare; however, as anyone who has ever been to a probate court is aware – the limited guardian is rare.    How can that be?     It is a fact because of corrupt jurists who do not believe in their oaths of office or as attorneys.     It exists because of the criminal activities of public official such as Jerome Larkin who treat their offices as personal fiefdoms so that they can flaunt their intellectual dishonesty.   
 
 
TL is known to many of the people on the barricades seeking to halt the offensive of Larkin and the elder cleansers.     I am certain that you know that about 30 years ago he was wrongfully adjudicated a disabled person so that a partner could grab his business interests.     The ploy worked and TL became a non-person.     A non-person unfortunately has few rights and is very easy to exploit.
  
 
In the Mary Sykes case, as an example, a safety deposit box was breached and a million dollars in gold coins just disappeared.     The fiduciary now exhibiting new wealth is protected by the booty, two guardians’ ad litem, several circuit court judges, the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission, etc.      It is very clear that none of the co-conspirators have paid dime one in Income taxes to the State of Illinois or the United States of America or is worried about prosecution pursuant to 18 USCA 371.     Indeed, they continue to assault the core values of America with the prosecution of Joanne Denison for mentioning their crimes in her blog!
 
 
TL as a non-person has been just over the radar trying to assist the families and friends of the elder cleansed wards of the corrupt guardians retain their rights of citizenship.    He pointed out to each of us that in addition to the statutory limitation on the powers of a guardian (and a court) to dehumanize his/her ward and strip them of their liberty and property rights there is federal legislation called the Americans With Disabilities Act that makes it clear the that criminal conspiracy of elder cleansing is ultra vires not only for the State courts, but, the entire United States of America.        Thus, Jerome Larkin’s assaults on JoAnne Denison’s civil rights are not only criminal under State law but Federal as well.      It is interesting but each attorney and each panel member who participates in these violations also commits criminal acts that could result in jail.     
 
 
If the Department of Justice going to indict Larkin for his 18 USCA 242, 18 USCA 1341 **** violations?     The evidence is overwhelming!        Are his co-conspirators going to jail with him?       In a perfect world this would have occurred already!     
 
 
The legislative action in Florida is laudable and a great victory for the elderly and the disabled who are being exploited and abuse openly and notoriously; however, law enforcement has to step in and put some of the miscreants in jail.     The legal profession has to step up and eliminate from its ranks Jerome Larkin and his ilk!      Mr. Justice Jackson pointed out during the trials of Nazi brass after World War 2 that being a ‘good German’ was not enough.     Humans have to follow their conscience and be intellectually honest.    The fact that Jerome Larkin can get away with his and his cronies assaults on the First Amendment does not legitimize them.     America Public Officials have to do more than talk or write legislation!
 
 
Everyone gets old!


[1] I defined the abusive, exploitative and ultra vires guardianships as “elder cleansing.”    Elder cleansing is the First cousin to racial cleansing and ethnic cleansing.

Must watch video–Florida’s struggle to regulate professional guardians

A mandatory watch.  A plea to get professional guardians regulated, to stop billing an estate months after a disabled person has died, to stop the fees, to stop the abuse.

The video is important.  It is admitted that there must be transparency between the court, attorneys and guardians–it does not happen right now.

There needs to be a cap on how many cases a professional guardian can handle.

http://www.flsenate.gov/media/videoplayer?EventID=2443575804_2015031531

Doug Franks represents AAAPG.net–Americans Against Probate Guardians and he gives a very good summary of the present problem.

In the video, Florida senators admit “there is a disaster on the horizon” and talk about numerous disasterous stories of guardianship abuses.

The chair of the Senate admits “everyone knows there have been abuses for awhile” and that Florida probate court has become “a cottage industry”.  These are phrases that the ARDC said that Ken Ditkowsky and myself could not say as lawyers, now we have the Fla. state legislatures saying them.

One senator that says he is never in favor of government regulation, supports a bill to regulate professional guardians and admits the abuses.

But then the ARDC in Illinois says there are no problems, when consumers with legitimate gripes complaint (Sykes, Gore, Bedin, Richards, Wyman, etc.), they get either no letter or nonsensical letters, there is a huge problem.  When Ken Ditkowsky and I state the same problems as on this video footage, the ARDC says we cannot mention it, they claim there is a “code of silence”.  When has a “code of silence” ever benefited lawyers or the judicial system:?

Man mugs the elderly in Berkley so Police work diligently to apprehend him. But who works diligently to apprehend the muggers in court?

http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2008-02-08/article/29130?headline=Police-Arrest-Suspect-in-Robberies-of-Elders–By-Richard-Brenneman

from this news article, rest assured if a black young man mugs the elderly for a few buck outside the grocery store, it will be investigated and he will be booked.

but the white collar criminals in your local probate court will  never suffer the same fate, for they have protection, cronies and they pay the right people

for they are protected. while this young man clobbered the elderly over the heads, your local nursing home drugs them, guardianizes them, drains the estate of 1,000 times the amount that this mugger did, and they’re nearly impossible to catch, investigate, indict and try.  It nearly never happens.

So what is the difference between the young man who clobbers the elderly over the head, and those that target, guardianize, isolate and medicate, drain the estate, eliminate and then cremate?  Nothing more than a white collar and a court room, if you ask me.

Thanks to Jane Stillwater for pointing this out to us.

joanne