I was thinking about your comments concerning religion as it relates to the SCOTUS brief.
I have not changed my mind concerning the use of the argument that Mr. Amu advanced, but, we still have to discuss it
The amounts of money that are generated by the cottage industry of elder cleansing are so huge that it boggles the imagination. So many of the elderly and disabled are totally helpless to defeat the predators who come into their lives as guardians, judicial officials, state officials or just medical providers. Family members are cowed and ultimately eliminated from the picture. The Sykes case 09 P 4585 in cook county, Illinois is a posterboard example.
Mr. Amu, every religion teaches us to aid and protect the sick and the disabled. These teachings are basis and well established in our Constitution and the fabric of American society. 18 USCA 4 encompasses this principle and when a Mary Sykes, Alice Gore, Carol Wyman or other elder cleansing victim is forcibly removed from her life by the profiteering predators operating nursing home, hospice facilities, ‘social service’ agencies become allies to the hospice/nursing home predators, etc., a moral call to action is sounded. Only a Jerome Larkin would consider a lawyer acting in accordance with his conscience to be unethical and warrant a suspension of a law licenses. In fact, only the nadir of society would espouse disciplinary action against lawyers who report corruption. Lawyer Amu’s situation adds a racial nexus to the mix.
We have all been subjected to the admonition by our parents, the clergy, society, et. al concerning our public duty to not only avoid sin, but to be pro-active in exposing it and protecting others from it. [Even the Wiccans advocate: “do as ye will, but do no harm”] Yes, these concepts [of protecting the elderly, the young and the infirm has sound basis in religion] are based in many religions, but it is also basic humanity. This is what makes this war on the elderly and the disabled so frustrating. How can a State agency such as the IARDC, with the attornment of the legal profession, aid and abet elder abuse, financial exploitation of the elderly and the assisted suicide of an involuntary subject. How can the Illinois Supreme Court elected judges not raise a hue and cry? Where is the Bar Association? Where is the ACLU? Where is law enforcement?
Mr. Amu, NASGA, Probate Sharks et al – some of us are standing tall! WE do it out of conviction our moral upbringing, our humanity, and the fact that is the right thing to do. We do it because we are Americans. Our religious conviction is irrelevant because we would stand up for those seniors and disabled persons who are being elder cleansed without religious affiliation. No human being (except for Jerome Larkin and his ilk) could tolerate or stand by when he/she observes a senior citizen such as Mary Sykes be:
1) spirited off and separated from her family, her friends, her church and her [rich and all encompassing] prior life. 09 P 4585 contains the proof that jurisdiction was ignored!
2) stripped of her freedom and liberty. Imagine not allowing a mother to even talk to her child, or an individual not being allowed to enjoy social intercourse with her siblings. (Oh yes, Re Hab Assist was to provided supervised visitation – ReHab is reputed to be a Morrris Esformes company [and there are many, many complaints regarding their prior behavior])
3) Stripped of her life savings. No [correct] inventory necessary – NB: Adam Stern (even faced with written notes from Mary requesting a lawyer) represented to the Court Mary Does not want a lawyer
What we have is our Court system, the 2nd oldest profession, many of our elected officials, et. al, aiding and abetting elder cleansing for fun and profit! Opposing the miscreants (no matter what the consequences) is not religion – it is humanity. For lawyers and public officials it is protecting the American Constitution.
In the 1930′s German and Russia societies ignored their humanity and the dividend was Hitler and Stalin. In 2014 America is ignoring its humanity and ********
(from Taos N.M 6/3/14)
Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/
From Joanne:
Please note that Ken wrote this while on a one month+ long, well deserved vacation after fighting in deep dark trenches of evil and perfidy. He has promised every probate victim out there, and potential victims, as I have, to work tirelessly on resolving these issues and bringing justice and integrity to the 18th floor. He is officially retired at age 77, but still he writes and researches daily and has become a industry leader in court corruption consulting. As has Mr. Amu and as have myself.
Mr Amu needs to understand that the good Lord and Lady put lawyers on this earth to read the good parts of every religious text that speaks of universal truths (peace, justice, understanding, patience, –and most of all, love) and after one’s heart has been opened up to those universal truths, then statutes such as our Bill of Rights, Free Speech under both the US and Illinois Constitution, 18 USC sec 4 for misprison of felony, Rule 11 in Fed. Ct. and Rule 137 in State Court that a lawyer must investigate before filing an appearance (Ken did and found out what concerned neighbors and friends and family said was in fact true–so true and scary, Ken was then threatened by sans jurisdiction sanctions by both PS and AS, I was threatened by Judge Connors that if I filed a Motion to appear for Gloria, I could “lose my license”–groundless, out of control threats are de rigeure in Probate) can be written and enacted. There is a laundry list of statutes that apply to Mary’s case. How, then does the ARDC respond? By filing complaints against Ken and I saying (falsely) we lied, and that the miscreants cannot be investigated or questioned (but Ken and I did exactly that, and the results are hair raising), and then prosecuting us with grueling trials, my Tribunal basically told the two family members, elderly and disabled–their (valid) claims could be dismissed out of hand, no compassion, no understanding, just excuses after excuse for why their beloved Mary is sitting in a situation she never wanted and she actively sought to avoid, by writing her advance directives–directives utterly ignored and dismissed by Judge Connors on at least several occasions in court! I was there for some. I helped Gloria file pleadings for some.
So again, I challenge the IARDC to link to the famous letter they claim was the grounds for Ken’s discipline so the world can see that they make findings of X when the letter clearly is Y. When we find incongruities like that, open and notorious, the next step is to find that there is a motive, deep, dark and greedy behind that type of nefarious injustice.
I believe that Mr. Larkin will publish that link when pigs sprout wings and fly or when H, E, double tooth picks reaches 0 deg. Kelvin.
JoAnne
Please note that Ken wrote this while on a one month+ long, well deserved vacation after fighting in deep dark trenches of evil and perfidy. He has promised every probate victim out there, and potential victims, as I have, to work tirelessly on resolving these issues and bringing justice and integrity to the 18th floor. He is officially retired at age 77, but still he writes and researches daily and has become a industry leader in court corruption consulting. As has Mr. Amu and as have myself.
Mr Amu needs to understand that the good Lord and Lady put lawyers on this earth to read the good parts of every religious text that speaks of universal truths (peace, justice, understanding, patience, –and most of all, love) and after one’s heart has been opened up to those universal truths, then statutes such as our Bill of Rights, Free Speech under both the US and Illinois Constitution, 18 USC sec 4 for misprison of felony, Rule 11 in Fed. Ct. and Rule 137 in State Court that a lawyer must investigate before filing an appearance (Ken did and found out what concerned neighbors and friends and family said was in fact true–so true and scary, Ken was then threatened by sans jurisdiction sanctions by both PS and AS, I was threatened by Judge Connors that if I filed a Motion to appear for Gloria, I could “lose my license”–threats are de rigeure in Probate) can be written and enacted. There is a laundry list of statutes that apply to Mary’s case. How, then does the ARDC respond? By filing complaints against Ken and I saying (falsely) we lied, and that the miscreants cannot be investigated or questioned (but Ken and I did exactly that, and the results are hair raising), and then prosecuting us with grueling trials, my Tribunal basically told the two family members, elderly and disabled–their (valid) claims could be dismissed out of hand, no compassion, no understanding, just excuses after excuse for why their beloved Mary is sitting in a situation she never wanted and she actively sought to avoid, by writing her advance directives–directives utterly ignored and dismissed by Judge Connors on at least several occassions in court! I was there for some. I helped Gloria file pleadings for some.
So again, I challenge the IARDC to link to the famous letter they claim was the grounds for Ken’s discipline so the world can see that they make findings of X when the letter clearly is Y. When we find incongruities like that, open and notorious, the next step is to find that there is a motive, deep, dark and financial behind that type of nefarious injustice.
I believe that Mr. Larkin will publish that link when pigs sprout wings and fly or when H, E, double tooth picks reaches 0 deg. Kelvin.
MaryGSykes.com 