From Ken Ditkowsky:
Sent: Jun 20, 2012 12:32 PM
Subject: elder Abuse
Here in Illinois we have a bunch of senior citizen cases in which a number of seniors have been deprived of their liberty, property, civil and human rights by court appointed miscreants. Illinois government ignores the problem until after the senior dies and the Judicial watchdogs stand squarely protecting the miscreants.
If you are interested Attorney JoAnne Denison maintains a website that has the Mary Sykes matter as its keynote. Probate Sharks and NASGA maintain more comprehensive blogs. The details are the same. A Gulag exists! An individual who is targeted can be declared incompetent, and have his/her rights terminated. GALs serve to protect the new status quo until the estate is stripped and the victim is allowed to die. In the Sykes case a person who the ‘ward’ complained about to the authorities was the preferred plenary guardian.
In spite of her treating doctor refusing to declare her incompetent, and Mary Sykes passing a written examination administered by the Secretary of State of Illinois Mary Sykes was declare incompetent. Of course no medical testify was need – the GAL told the Court that the written protestations of the victim were ‘undue influence’ of a close family member (the younger daughter) and the victim did not want a lawyer. As the treating physician was unwilling to certify, the Court counseled the miscreant applicant to find a doctor who was more co-operative.
It has been a scandal that some our expert witnesses will testify to just about anything for a price = Naturally one of those doctors was found. The rest is history.
The scary thing is that placed in proper context one of the compliant judges could and would declare you or me as incompetent and appoint a plenary guardian for us depriving us of our liberty, property, and civil rights.
When a group of citizens requested I investigate, I did. I was first subjected to a sanction motion. It did not bother anyone that the Court had no jurisdiction over me, I was sanctioned. As I am a lawyer, I took an appeal. The Appellate Court vacated the sanction award and dismissed it on jurisdictional grounds. The two GALs in the Sykes case filed ARDC complaints against me for the unethical activity of protesting the violation of my First Amendment Rights (and that of my clients). Believe it or not the ARDC refused to investigate the GAL who misused their positions, but it has filed a disciplinary action against me.
In Illinois exercising First Amendment Rights is unethical.
From JoAnne Denison;
While the GAL’s have repeatedly alleged that KD (and I have seen this erroneously reported on other blogs) state that he allegedly sent a letter to Dr. Patel stating he represented Mary and needed her medical records, I have not seen a copy of that letter anywhere. It should have been attached to the complaint against KD. Did the miscreants forge such a letter? In any case, KD had the authority of Gloria who undoubtedly had the authority of Mary to obtain medical records. I am certain that Gloria was listed as a person to disclose Mary’s medical information to.
Has the ARDC subpoenaed Dr. Patel for those authorization forms? I bet not.
I believe that KD received quite a few medical records for Mary from Gloria nonetheless.
All good questions for Ms. Black at the ARDC, since her complaint seems to turn on all of these issues.