From KKD: status of guardianship in Illinois is still code red

On Monday, September 9, 2019, 08:25:55 PM CDT, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:
Indeed – Shame on me – in my America every day the HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN GRANDMA CONTINUES unabated.

I heard from an Illinois citizen that his wife was seized by the Illinois Public Guardian and he and her son have been barred from any contact with her.     Exactly how a guardian (including the public guardian) could have been appointed is a major mystery.     Several medical professionals have denied that the wife is incompetent – however, the Court is reported to have determined that the citizen (and his wife) failed to meet the standard of determining that she is not in need of guardian.

It appears that on the 18th Floor of the Daley Center in Chicago the 14th Amendment has been abrogated and Statutes regulating guardianship have been reduced to the criteria of human trafficking in the elderly.

The Illinois Statutes define guardianship and the standard of proof, to wit:

(755 ILCS 5/11a-2) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 11a-2)
Sec. 11a-2. “Person with a disability” defined.) “Person with a disability” means a person 18 years or older who (a) because of mental deterioration or physical incapacity is not fully able to manage his person or estate, or (b) is a person with mental illness or a person with a developmental disability and who because of his mental illness or developmental disability is not fully able to manage his person or estate, or (c) because of gambling, idleness, debauchery or excessive use of intoxicants or drugs, so spends or wastes his estate as to expose himself or his family to want or suffering, or (d) is diagnosed with fetal alcohol syndrome or fetal alcohol effects.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)

 

    (755 ILCS 5/11a-3) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 11a-3)
Sec. 11a-3. Adjudication of disability; Power to appoint guardian.
(a) Upon the filing of a petition by a reputable person or by the alleged person with a disability himself or on its own motion, the court may adjudge a person to be a person with a disability, but only if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the person is a person with a disability as defined in Section 11a-2. If the court adjudges a person to be a person with a disability, the court may appoint (1) a guardian of his person, if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning the care of his person, or (2) a guardian of his estate, if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he is unable to manage his estate or financial affairs, or (3) a guardian of his person and of his estate.
(b) Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the person with a disability, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)

 

The statute is quite clear – the burden of proving the need for a guardian is not only placed on the petitioner, but requires the highest standard of proof (in a civil case), to wit:

Clear and Convincing evidence

This standard was not determined by the Illinois legislature as a whim – it is mandated by the 5th and the 14th Amendment, the Illinois Constitution, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.     The statute is also very limited, to wit:

(b) Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the person with a disability, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15

 

The words of the Statute unfortunately are being routinely ignored by ‘corrupt’ judges, attorneys appointed as guardian ad litems, and persons appointed as guardians.     What has occurred however is the ‘birth’ of a cottage industry – i.e. the HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN THE ELDERLY.

If you google the subject of the appointment of guardians you will get a sanitized impression of a legal process designed to assist the elderly = not a predatory criminal enterprise.    That impression is wrong in a great number of cases.     Even more serious is the fact that these criminal enterprises have been and are being documented by many – and almost totally ignored by the judiciary, the judiciary disciplinary commissions, our elected officials, local law enforcement,  the public, the media, and until recently even Federal Law Enforcement.

There is no shortage of expose’        Blogs have been published exposing in vivid detail that modern Holocaust and Gulag, to wit: Probate Sharks, NASGA, MaryGSykes, AAAPG *****.     The Oct 9, 2017 NEW YORKER, the Wall Street Journal, the New York times ***** have written articles exposing the criminal enterprise, and currently in Florida another Guardian has been exposed well exceeding any possible authority she might have had.    Dr. Samuel Sugar has written a book (Guardianship) that leaves all doubt as to the MO of the miscreants and just how they get away with overt Kidnapping, extortion, intimidation, theft, tax evasion, money laundering, conspiracy, civil rights violations etc.    Janet Phelan has similarly exposed details concerning the nitty gritty of the ‘elder cleansing’ ******

The Government Accounting Office has also published several (4) reports to Congress detailing the cottage industry and while mostly generating yawns, a couple of bills duplicating remedies that should be inherent in the RULE OF LAW and primary laws of a Democracy have been passed.     Only recently has the Federal Law authorities been noted to be looking into this massive and incredibly lucrative criminal enterprise.       The fact that some victims and their families are reporting the emergence of Federal law Enforcement doing HONEST INVESTIGATIONS is heartening.

The foregoing aside – it is apparent that the ‘beat goes on’ and the arrogance of the POLITICAL AND JUDICIAL ELITE who are actively engaged in the human trafficking in the elderly continues unabated.       In almost every case we note the following:

1.   Isolation of the victim.      Grandma is seized, and separated from her family and prior life.    A guardian ad litem or some other Court official points out to the Court that grandma is upset when she finds herself isolated and the GAL concludes that the family agitates Grandma.    Thus, to visit Grandma the family has to pay a Court related firm to supervise visitation.

2.   Appoint a guardian and seize assets.    If the Statute is followed prior to a guardian being appointed the Court must hold a hearing and comply with DUE PROCESS.     This is obviated by the Gal reporting to the Court that grandma has waived her right to due process, notice, hearing, clear and convincing evidence of her actual disability if any, and her humanity.       The Court without further then appoints a guardian who immediately seizes all the assets that can be located – including but not limited to the assets of Grandpa and any member of the family who objects to the human trafficking in grandma.   (NB.  Sometimes a family member has to be appointed guardian – if that family member does not co-operate in the elder cleansing felonies he/she is accused of stealing from grandma and punished.    A then more co-operative guardian is appointed.

3.   Opioids and other chemicals are routinely administered to grandma so that she is docile.    Federal and State health care programs (and some insurance programs) are very generous in providing the cash to support the continued kidnapping and isolation.     The Nursing homes are usually owned by large contributors to the dominant political party and they are grateful to their benefactors.   Come election time grandma votes for the candidates of the political party.     The Government supplies ample fund to fully compensate all the miscreants.

4.   A family member or interested person who objects to the HUMAN TRAFFICKING in Grandma is hauled before the Court, threatened with sanctions, contempt (jail), and other punishments.    If that family member should accidentally remember that this court’s venue is the United States of America and not Soviet Russia he/she is terrorized and subjected to criminal judicial criminals that would shock a Soviet Judge’s conscience.     Lawyers who interfere with the process are suspended from the practice of law by the State Supreme Court.    (All hearings are of the Kangaroo variety – i.e. the result is determined prior to the hearing)

5.   When Grandma’s assets are depleted and there are no more funds to be stolen – Grandma suddenly expires!      To alleviate the sadness of the even, cremation occurs as if grandma were an Orthodox Jew.

6.   The court approves all the accountings of the guardians and closes the estate.

 

Dr. Sugar’s book suggests that the ‘feeding tube’ scenario is used to make certain that the Carolyn Wyman situation is not repeated.   (Ms. Wyman’s son recognized that his mother was perfectly competent and that she was going to be ‘[elder cleansed’     The son, entered the nursing home, and spirited his mother not only out of the home, but to a Western state.     His mother opened her business and made a substantial income to support herself not only embarrassing the corrupt GAL, Judge, Attorneys etc.     She did not return to Illinois leaving the miscreants with an embarrassment.    Had the guardian not been negligent and installed a feeding tube, Ms. Wyman would never have escaped and her son could never have written a book detailing the trafficking in his mother.      (If you want to learn more about Mrs. Wyman give JoAnne Denison as call.    Attorney Denison is actively exposing the criminal conspiracy (my words) – Mr. Jerome Larkin, the Illinois Disciplinary commission – refers to Attorney Denison’s exposing of criminals in black robes as “yelling fire in a crowded theater!)

The Illinois Statute is clear – even if it is ignored.     It also is the Standard and consistent with the mandate of the 14th Amendment.     The guardianship for grandma is not a trivial thing – it is a terrorist attack on America that now has claimed more victims that 9/11!        The home grown terrorists in Illinois are elected to public office year after year and will be continued to be elected – UNLESS the United States of America gets really serious and demonstrates that the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA actually has meaning and is not just a collection of words.

When the bleeding hearts go on their scavenger hunts for alleged atrocities conducted by our government it is interesting that they ignore the modern holocaust / gulag that is being committed against GRANDMA!      The irony is that YOU and I are both potential victims of the human trafficking in Grandma!     It is in our self interest to demand and see to it that the corrupt judiciary and their co=conspirators are brought to Justice.     It is either them or us!     Intelligent people should recognize their own self interest?

 

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

Remember the words of the statute lost in the translation by the corrupt judges who have anointed those criminals who would separate us from our liberty, humanity, property and Americanism, to wit:

 

 

(b) Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the person with a disability, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual’s actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15

Advertisements

1 thought on “From KKD: status of guardianship in Illinois is still code red

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s