From Ken Ditkowsky–The War on Truth by the ARDC continues–with a false judgement

This proves there is no end to the perfidy spewn by the ARDC (Illinois Attorney and Registration Commission)

Today I found their false and fictitious judgment against me recorded at the recorder’s offices and this is well after they had been informed the court reporter at my trial was unlicensed.

See the link: False $18,000 Judgment

Now from Ken Ditkowsky:

JoAnne;
 
The document that you sent to me  represents a very serious BREACH OF THE PUBLIC TRUST and it requires me to Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and lawyer Rule 8.3 to report the felony that it represents.   It is my duty as a citizen to report the actions of Mr. Larkin and the IARDC (and others) for this case of very serious extortion, Wire Fraud, violation of Civil Rights.   The aforesaid promulgation of the submitted document  by Jerome Larkin, individually and as the administrator of the IARDC steps far over the line of decency.     Such action cannot be tolerated in Illinois or any State that has come under the Jurisdiction of the United States of America.     The aforesaid conspiracy by Larkin and others to violate Federal Law brings into play 18 USCA 371 and it is further averred that unknown persons employed by the public entity IARDC are similarly involved, and must suffer the consequences of their miscreant behavior and breach of Civil protections guaranteed by the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF THE ILLINOIS CONSTITUTION OF 1970.
 
I base these allegations on the fact that Mr. Larkin commenced his fraud by joining into an agreement to deny you your Civil Rights and in particular you First Amendment Right to petition your government and demand an HONEST INVESTIGATION of a Conspiracy to defraud Federal Health Care programs, Insurance carriers, and senior citizens entitled to the protection of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
 
It is alleged upon reliable information and belief as follows:
 
1) Mary Sykes was against her will removed from her home in Cook County, Illinois and isolated from her friends, family members who loved her (in particular Gloria Sykes) and kept a virtual prisoner.
 
2) That to accomplish certain nefarious and wrongful acts, the Circuit Court of Cook County was enlisted and in particular Judge Maureen Connors.     Connors pursuant to the agreement of certain individuals was to assume jurisdiction over the victim so that:
 
    a) A certain petition for a protective order filed against Carolyn **** would not be heard by the Court.  (This protective order “fell” from the docket and the file was later found secreted away in Judge Flanagin’s ante room.)
 
    b) A certain safety deposition box containing approximately a million dollars in gold coins cold be accessed and control thereof could be appropriated.  (see Gloria Sykes Affidavit and order to drill safe deposit box in Jan 2010 signed by Carolyn Toerpe)
 
    c) Mary Sykes property could be removed from her and distributed to the co-conspirators.
 
    d) Mary Sykes could be used as a vehicle to obtain Federally funded Health Care funds including but not limited to Medicare that were excessive and fraudulent.
 
    e) Mary Sykes could be used as a vehicle to obtain from others, including the health insurance company insuring spouses of Chicago Police Department officers over-charges and other moneys that were wrongful and fraudulent.
 
3) That pursuant to an agreement between Attorney ***** representing the guardian, Guardian ad Litem ******, Guardian ad Litem ******, Judge Connors, and others a lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois as case 09 P 4585.
 
4) That at all times relevant each of the co-conspirators was aware of provisions of the Illinois guardianship at 755 ILCS 5/11a -1 et seq and in particular sections 3, 3b, and 10 and was aware that a special summons disclosing the RIGHTS of a person being accused being declared incompetent.
 
5) That the Attorney from the petitioning prospective guardian in an attempt to deceive ignored the provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Law and the aforesaid 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 and tried to create the impression that the statute was complied with by instructing the Sheriff of Cook County to serve summons on Mary Sykes in Cook County when he, his client, the two guardian ad litem, and Judge Connors were all aware that Mary was being kept isolated in DuPage County, Illinois.
 
6) That Judge Connors was fully aware at all times relevant that:
 
    1. No service of summons was had on Mary Sykes (according to the Sheriff of Cook County) and the Court file did not contain any return of service.
 
    2.  The required Notice of a hearing (as required by the 5th and 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United STates of America) referred to by the Illinois Supreme Court as jurisdictional was not given to the next of kin of Mary Sykes.   In particular no notice of a competency hearing for Mary Sykes was ever given to Gloria Sykes daughter or either of the two siblings of Mary Sykes.
 
    3) that to determine a person to be incompetent the said person must be proven incompetent by clear and convincing evidence  755 ILCS 5/11a -3
 
    4) no hearing was held to determine competency.  Instead GAL ***** submitted an order to Connors appointing a guardian knowing full well that not a scintilla of honest proof had been presented to establish incompetency of Mary Sykes.
 
    5) that Judge Connors was predisposed to create a guardianship.  (Wired) see page 91 of her evidence deposition taken by Jerome Larkin’s office.
 
7)  That during the course of the guardianship it is estimated that 3 million dollars was extracted from Mary Sykes’ assets and an indeterminate amount was taken from Federally funded health care programs and Insurance carriers.
 
8)  That when the perfidy noted supra was discovered Jerome Larkin, Lea Black, Sharon Opryszek***** (employees of public entity IARDC) were enlisted by the two Guardian ad Litem wrongfully appointed by Judge Connors and the Attorney for the wrongfully (and without jurisdiction) appointed plenary guardian.    These attorneys were enlisted in violation of 18 USCA 371 to ‘cover up’ and foster the theft of Mary Sykes assets and to stifle and prevent Attorney JoAnne Denison and Kenneth Ditkowsky from demanding HONEST INVESTIGATIONS of the violation of ADA, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Civil Rights, thefts of government health care funds *****.
 
9)  That Larkin and the other co-conspirators agreed to act in such a manner as to intimidate attorneys and in particular JoAnne Denison from disclosing the multitude of criminal frauds and wrongs being perpetrated in case 09 P 4585 and in dozens of similar cases on the 18th Floor of the Daley Center, Chicago, Illinois.
 
10) that Larkin and the other co-conspirators filed documents under oath in disciplinary proceedings with the express intention of misleading the Supreme Court of Illinois to believing that Judge Connors et al  and the Court appointed miscreants were complying with 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 et seq (and the Constitution).    At all times relevant Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators knew that an examination of the file in 09 P 4585 would reveal the human trafficking of the elderly, and in particular, that of Mary Sykes.   
 
11) That when JoAnne Denison was not intimidated and published on her blog MARYGSYKES the terrible abuse of the public trust of Judge Connors and other Judges sitting in the Circuit court of Cook County disciplinary hearings were had and perjury was fostered.    When even kangaroo hearings and extra judicial proceedings did not deter Denison from continuing to expose corruption of Larkin et al. (it is believed and therefore alleged) instituted more Procrustean measures which included altering Court transcripts, subordination of perjury, covering up false testimony of Judge *****, hiring non-licensed Court Reporters ******.   Larkin in Court documents filed with the Supreme Court of Illinois referred to the exposure of corrupt judges as being akin to “yelling fire in a crowded theater” and materially misrepresented the holdings of the SCOTUS (particularly the Alvarez case.)
 
12.   That Larkin, still unable to intimidate Denison from enjoying her First Amendment Rights petitioned the Supreme Court of Illinois for reimbursement of certain fraudulent costs.  (Illinois Statutes prohibit payment of Court Reporter fees submitted by a non-license Court reporter – these are included).   
 
13.  That it appears that the fraudulent cost petition has been reduced to Judgment and further fraud and deprivation of Rights has been had on Attorney Denison.
 
As a Citizen of the United States of America, by this e-mail I am calling on the President of the United States, the Department of Justice, and all law enforcement to Act to prevent further dissipation of the Citizen Right of JoAnne Denison and all other citizens of the State of Illinois by the 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators, and for an HONEST INVESTIGATION of the Elder Cleansing of Mary Sykes and other senior citizens domiciled in the State of Illinois.  

From Joanne;

Please join with me in writing Larkin and informing him that his continuing crimes against the citizens of the State of Illinois are not going unnoticed and that his perfidy in filing a false judgment against Joanne Denison in an attempt to shut down her blog about ongoing criminal activities against the elderly will not be tolerated under the First Amendment.

You can fax or write Jerome Larkin at:

312 565-2320

Mr. Jerome Larkin

Administrator

illinois ARDC

130 E. Randolph St, 15th Floor

Chicago Illinois 60601

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “From Ken Ditkowsky–The War on Truth by the ARDC continues–with a false judgement

  1. why don’t you focus on the current Lahody case. Joanne you and Ken have too much idle time. what ever happened to the senate hearings. you keep harpingon cases that are dead. JOANNE I don’t know if you have a personnel stake against me, but nothing happened and I have no reason to feel guilty, you approached me and offered me fake items. get over yourself.

    • I would be glad to publish anything you would like me to publish. You have not sent me anything to publish for you.

      I know your case is awful. I would suggest you put up all your pleadings on gdrive and I will put a link up to them and then we can start blogging about your case.

      What has happened recently? Can you get me a synopsis to publish?

      I am always looking for good articles, so send me your thoughts. We all want to know what is happening.

      thanks

      joanne

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s