A Yale professor got on television and told us that the reason ******* received he support it got was because the American people are stupid.   Recently another Administration lackey told us how the Iran deal was sold to twenty something members of the press and the Stupid American public.  In fact, the contempt for the intelligence of Americans exhibited by our elected leaders – this is not just Obama administration people – it is cross board arrogance.

In our Universities we have bunches of narrow minded students and faculty who want to censor all opposing thought – and they are rubbing our noses in it.   Hillary Clinton’s UBS deal and her campaign rhetoric is a reaffirmation that she and her republican and democratic allies have little respect for you and me.

the truth of the matter is she is right – we are not worthy of respect as we have consistently elected people of low morals and high degrees of intellectual dishonesty.

Now – getting back to basics.    The people in power, especially judges, are well aware that they are walking very close to the line.   If they cross the line they could be a Dr. Richard Fine, Grant Goodman (Ariz), Lanre Amu, JoAnne Denison *****.    If that happens- bingo – disgrace, dishonor, *****.

No matter how Judge Connors twists, turns, or postures she admitted on page 91 she admitted to being wired.   No matter who Jerome Larkin postures he is aware that Mary Sykes was railroaded into her elder cleansing scenario and Alice Gore was not robbed of the gold in her teeth by nazi storm troopers – it was a guardian ad litem with connections to nursing homes that orchestrated the atrocity.   It was obvious that avarice was her credo and Larkin and his gang of 18 USCA 371 hoodlums *****.

Yes, the individual members of the Supreme Court of Illinois might routinely deny the motion, but they do not know if the SCOTUS having it in the record might cheat the 17,000 to 1 odds and look at this case!   Or the Wall Street Journal might *****, or ******.

As your mother used to warn – doing bad things has consequences.   Doing the good and/or the right thing may not have consequences – most of the time it yields good consequences.   Arguing for Justice for Mary Sykes or Alice Gore is not a vain act – it makes us feel virtuous.   It also might attract the 1 in 17ooo chance!

sunita, you fail to note, where is the judge and where is the otherside?  In the case of the ARDC, the lines are blurred. The ARDC acts as judge, jury and executioner in one neat package. also, we are not before the trial court judge. we are before the Illinois Sup. Ct.  and Ken is right, on multiple occasions 7 justices have had an opportunity to do the right thing, pick up my pleadings and make a stink over the fact my case is defaming  the State of Illinois. what should happen is that one justice, one brave justice, should have picked up my pleading and done a “In re Weddigen” concurring opinion on it and wrapped the flag around himself and made a glorious grandstand for Truth, Justice and the American Way. there’s still a chance.  the elections are coming up, candidates with poor records on protecting the rights of the people are searching for some BS grandstanding, and this is the perfect case for one party to redeem itself. political prisoners, grave injustices are always fodder for errant pols. my blog just gets more and more popular.  probatesharks is now getting 10,000 hits per day joanne