From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Oct 27, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Lawrence Hyman , “Complaint ADA (CRT)”
Cc: Eric Holder , “FBI- ( (” , Chicago FBI , Probate Sharks , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Harry Heckert , Tim NASGA , “J. Ditkowsky” , Nasga Us , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Janet Phelan , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Ginny Johnson , BILL DITKOWSKY , Bev Cooper , FOX News Network LLC , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , Alyece Russell , Glenda Martinez , Jay Goldman , Diane Nash , Scott Evans , Kathie Bakken , Kevin Pizzarello , Garr Sanders , Bill Kristol , “Kirk@kirk.senate.gov”
Subject: Blood money
Until I ran across Mr. Larkin and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Distortion Commission I believed that at least at some level the political elite and justice system worked. Larkin has taught me in the Amu case that Jim Crow is not dead, but, has changed its name to “legal ethics” and a uppity man with a skin color that is a hue darker than Mr. Larkin’s warrants a three year suspension of his law license if he complains that a judge hearing one of his cases has tilted the playing field a bit. In my case I learned that it was absolutely proper for corrupt judges and lawyers to railroad senior citizens into guardianships, isolate them from their loved ones, redistribute the seniors’ estates to themselves and some friends, and ultimately kill of the victim; however, to comply with 18 USCA 4 and report the felonies is a heinous ethical breach warranting a four year suspension of a law license. Larkin further taught me in the Denison case that he does not believe that he is subject to the First Amendment or any law. Then, I learned that even due process is irrelevant when Larkin is involved.
Thus, I decided to pay the ‘blood money’ that Larkin wants as his “costs” The $1000.00 check number 4582 was mailed this morning along with the following letter, to wit:
5940 West Touhy Ave
October 26, 2014
Mr. Jerome Larkin
Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
3161 West White Oaks Drive
Springfield, Illinois 62704
Dear Mr. Jerome Larkin :
I am in receipt of your letter of September 26, 2014 notifying me of what appears to be an out of term time ex-parte judgment of $1000.00 entered against me in direct violation of the retaliation provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Without waiving any rights including the Right to seek remediation and prosecution for your continued aiding and abetting elder cleansing, enclosed please find a check for the $1,000 judgment wrongfully in inappropriately entered. Please forward a receipt and satisfaction of judgment.
cc: Honorable Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States of America, Americans with Disabilities Complaint Department.
Let me make the record very clear. I am personally by this e-mail filing an ADA complaint for retaliation on the following basis:
1) Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 and other Federal and State statutes I complained pursuant to ADA and other statutes of the elder abuse and exploitation of Mary Sykes, 09 P 4585. In particular I complained to Mr. Holder by letter (which letter was produced during disciplinary proceedings by Larkin, whose attorney asked me if I was repentant for writing the letter of complaint) concerning the attempted elder cleansing of Ms. Sykes.
2) That from time to time I have complained to law enforcement and demanded an Honest complete and comprehensive investigation of malpractice of Guardian ad litems Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, and others in that they have participated with Mr. Larkin in preventing certain disabled (senior citizens) from obtaining a reasonable accommodation for their alleged disabilities and have acting in concert with certain judges acted in concert with those judges (sans jurisdiction) to deprive disabled persons and in particular Mary Sykes of equal protection of the law and the reasonable accommodation to which the said senior citizens are absolutely entitled. An example that I have given is the prospecting in the mouth of Alice Gore for her gold filings, the removal of the same and the non-inventory thereof.
3) That from time to time I have complained to law enforcement and demanded an Honest complete and comprehensive investigation of Mr. Larkin and various attorneys who receive public funds in their efforts to intimidate, and harass family members who have complained of the elder cleansings of various disabled and elderly persons.
The demand of Mr. Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court of $1000.00 is a clear retaliation against me for invoking the ADA. By a separate cover I will forward a copy of the check and my covering letter. An Honest intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of the violations of ADA complaints filed by myself and by others is requested. We believe that a Grand Jury investigation of the Mary Sykes, Alice Gore and related cases is called for as the violations have been committed by Attorneys who know or should know the Law of the Land.
Thank you for your courtesy and co-operation