By State Law, nursing homes are regulated by the State and are to regularly inspected.

 

Unfortunately the nursing home is a treasure trove.

 

1) Government funds flow almost unimpeded to the well connected nursing homes.   

2) When an inspection is to occur, the facility is warned by co=operative public officials and major money deficiencies are covered over.

3) creative book keeping is virtually undetectable and ethically challenged doctors are well paid to fictionalize medical conditions and acceptable procedures.

4)  treatment such as PT are figments of imagination however the charges are not.

5) Enron type corporations dot the landscape so as to provide bills for such items as nursing care, drugs, transportation, utilities, laundry, etc.   If you want the nursing home to make a profit – bingo!   If you want it to operate a loss that is also readily obtainable.

6) come election time between a controlled pooling place in the facility and absentee ballots we can deliver 100% of the votes cast to Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse, or whomever.  

 

We have legislation!    The  salons can pass more if they wish, but as long as the large nursing home operations have public officials in their pocket, judicial officials in their pocket, etc – the elderly are merely predator targets. 

 

Unfortunately across America there are dozens of cases that are similar – Elder Cleansing is a cancer.  

With senior citizens as the prey for corrupt public, judicial, and other officials we need law enforcement to enforce the law.   Tim Lahrman has suggested that our legislative remedy has already been enacted – i.e. Americans with disabilities title 2.   

 

Last night I was confronted by a question – how does a public official who makes a serious mistake correct it?       The question arose out of a discussion of Judge McCarthy’s violation in open Court of Gloria Sykes’ Americans with Disabilities right to reasonable accommodation for a historically recognized disability.     As Judge Serving in the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois McCarthy is presumed to be aware of the strong policy of the United States of America to make certain that a disability does not create a discrimination that prevents full enjoyment of the benefits of American democracy.     Simply put Judge McCarthy was required to provide Ms. Sykes with the reasonable accommodation of having her ‘working dog’ or ‘service dog’ Shaggy with her. [1]     

The proposition was presented:   “Suppose that Judge McCarthy really did not know of ADA or in the alternative had a blind spot?”     The answer is quite simple .     McCarthy as a Judge could ‘sua sponde’ vacate the order of September 5, 2014 authored by Guardian Adam Stern and Attorney Peter Schmiedel and do two things:   1) acknowledge that it is a reasonable accommodation for Gloria to have Shaggy with her as she presents her case in Court, and 2) set Gloria’s Petition (also under ADA) requesting that the Circuit Court comply with the law in reference to guardianship and ADA as it relates to the ‘elder cleansing’ that is illegally continuing in which her mother is a victim.    

ADA is not a ‘gotyou’ statute – it is a good faith recognition that minor disabilities including but not limited to deafness, blindness, old age, etc. are not forfeitures of the core protections of America.   This concept is recognized in America Law and our fight against elder cleansing is aimed at preventing guardian miscreants and those who aid and abet them from exploiting their judicial position for their (the miscreants) personal benefit.      A senior citizen who is losing some of his abilities is entitled to a reasonable accommodation for the age related disabilities pursuant to ADA.     The concept and practice of elder cleansing that is being recognized as occurring in probate divisions across the United States is a felony and prohibited by not only ADA, but by State law as well.     The Sykes case 2009 P 4585 is a poster board case and exhibits the most obscene picture of ‘elder cleansing’ in most of its forms.    In re: the Estate of Alice Gore and the prospecting of Ms. Gore’s mouth for the gold in her teeth represents the nadir.

Corruption does not have to have the element of avarice associated with it.     Judge McCarthy during term time has the ability to sua sponte correct her order.     Yes, if she does do such a thing she will offend some of the predators who are conducting the War on the elderly and the disabled.     Yes, she will have to admit not being knowledgeable of some very basic law.    Yes, she might feel embarrassed.     But – so what!     A Judge (and lawyers) complying with the law is what America expects of the 2 ^nd oldest profession.         In a similar manner, Jerome Larkin had the opportunity to recognize that Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission was assaulting the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights in its prosecution of Mr. Amu, Ms. Dension, and myself for speaking out against corruption in the Circuit Court of Cook County.     Larkin knew or should have known that compliance with 18 USCA 4 was not ethically challenged.    Yet to mollify Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel, Judge Connors, Judge Stuart and other clout heavy individuals who were engaging in the elder cleansing of Mary Sykes or other corruptions, Larkin seized upon complaint letters to the Attorney General of the United States and wired his ‘hordes’ to suspend Amu for three years, and Ditkowsky for four years!       The felons who stripped Mary Sykes of her Liberty and ravaged her estate removing with inventory of more than a million dollars were protected by Larkin.     Larkin had every opportunity to recognize that such conduct on his part violated the core values of the United States and ADA – he of course continues in his assault on America!      Larkin by my definition is corrupt even if he does not obtain a penny of graft!     Judge McCarthy will be corrupt if she does not sua sponde comply with ADA.

[1] Shaggy is a lovable animal who is well trained and totally benign.     Even individuals who a terrified of dogs find him to be so attractive that a few minutes in his presence results in a virtual ‘love affair.’     Shaggy claims Gloria’s anxiety disorder and allows her to perform complex intellectual tasks.    Only Larkin’s hordes have prior to this time failed to recognize ADA, but, even they relented when they realized that this was one act that was guaranteed to bring them personally and individually to the bar of justice.      This is what made Judge McCarthy’s refusal to comply with ADA so obscene.

 

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/