From Ken Ditkowsky —

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: May 30, 2014 5:03 PM
To: JoAnne Denison , NASGA , probate sharks , j ditkowsky , Harry Heckert , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk , Janet Phelan , Cook County States Attorney
Cc: Chicago Tribune , “” , “” , “” , SUNTIMES , “” , “” , “” , Chicago FBI , “” , GLORIA SYKES , Ginny Johnson Justice4 Everyone Blog Fan , Janet Phelan
Subject: Fw: I2F – Transaction Review Result

I thought it was rather interesting that knowing that the Supreme Court has in about a dozen cases pointed out that government cannot limit, impede or interfere with Free Speech.  Larkin has the temerity to no only continue to prosecute me, but he filed a petition for costs.  
I filed a response once again suggesting that the Illinois Supreme Court and the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission are required to follow the law as set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States.   Equally interesting is the fact that Jerome Larkin demonstrates his total disrespect for the law in that 18 USCA 4 provides for a three year penalty for not reporting felonies such as are found in the Sykes and similar cases.   Larkin decrees that an attorney who complies with 18 USCA 4 is ethically challenged and therefore he meted out a four year suspension to me.   
Catch 22 is alive and well!    Three years for not complying with the law and four years for doing so!    Ever wonder why the public has no respect for the Law.   It will be interesting to see is the Illinois Supreme Court is embarrassed by Larkin, the IARDC, and the obvious aiding and abetting of corruption in the Illinois courts.
As Mr. Larkin is openly and notoriously defying the mandate of the United States of America and openly and notoriously obstructing justice, I’ve forwarded this information to the Mr. Holder.  (Mr. Larkin does not approve of lawyers writing to the Justice Department – his stooge asked me on cross examination if I repented for a letter I sent to the Attorney General of the United States.   People in the Gallery were shocked by the question and are still buzzing over the fact that an attorney paid the State of Illinois demonstrated gross ignorance by asking such a question.  Apparently the law schools do not teach the first amendment or the policy and practice of the IARDC is to maintain a code of silence so as to protect as much corruption as is possible).    
The question that is presented is – does the Rule of Law mean something – or is like the Soviet constitution – meaningless words!  
I requested an HONEST intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of the entire elder cleansing scandal – No only has Larkin and the IARDC indicated they are not interested the have prosecuted JoAnne, Amu and myself for making such a suggestion.
For Larkin’s edification – please be advised that I do not repent for complying with 18 USCA 4, and routinely now write to law enforcement not only requesting an HONEST COMPLETE INTELLIGENT AND COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION of the IARDC, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel, Miriam Solo et al and their respective roles in the Sykes, Gore and similar cases but I intend to press not only for the investigation but for an investigation of why Larkin, Black et al are so opposed to such an investigation and how they justify aiding and abetting the criminal conduct that has been performed on Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Tyler and others!   It will be very interesting to hear under oath explanation concerning *****
Ken Ditkowsky

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s