Why did they disQ my attorney, again?

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jul 15, 2013 8:54 PM
To: Eric Holder , matt senator kirk
Subject: Unethical conduct and attempted intimidation

I understand why the IARDC does not want JoAnne Denison to be represented.
JoAnne has a blog in which she creates a successful forum in which people who are victims of elder cleansing can voice their opinions and demand an investigation of the miscreants.   In particular she can and does call attention to such notables as CF – who without a scintilla of knowledge as to what was in a safety deposit box has not problem in denying facts that the actor (Carolyn Toerpe cannot deny and does not deny).  AS, who actively has prevent Mary Sykes from enjoying her liberty and property and has participated in the outrageous attempted intimidation of Gloria Sykes.    Miriam Solo who is reputed to have been the ‘force’ behind the stripping of Alice Gore of her 1.5 million dollar estate and the gold in her teeth.   Ms. Solo’s activity are legend.   Her latest escapade was to induce a judge to enter a citation judgment based upon promissory notes that her client claims not to know if they are in writing or not!
The fact that Congress provided 47 USCA 230 and our founding father the 1st, 5th and 14th amendments is irrelevant to the IARDC and its activities in reference to Greylord Jr.   The Zimmerman case was investigated by the FBI, and we all know that any further government involvement therein is going to either give America a ‘black eye’ or waste precious money that could go to protect those amongst us who cannot protect themselves.   The attack on the First Amendment by the IARDC in the Denison case as illustrated by their latest filings is beyond the pale and over the top.
The politics of the Denison case is at this point in time under the radar; however, like Greylord the Chickens are coming home to roost.   It may not be tonight or tomorrow, but, rest assured they will and the embarrassment is going to be obscene.   We are watching the Constitution of the United States raped and murdered by people paid by the State of Illinois.   How do we justify these expenditures when the State fails to fund the pensions of people who worked for it in good faith!   How do we justify a state agency ignoring the Rule of law!
Attorney General Holder – I urge you to have an assistant take a gander at the Sykes case and then at the IARDC complaint filed against Ms. Denison.    As your assistant – HOW CAN THIS OCCUR IN AMERICA!     Was there a revolution last night in which the Bill of Rights was suspended?   President Obama deserves a proud legacy – not the legacy of the perfidy and the terrorism that is exemplified in the Sykes case 09 P 4585 and the ARDC vs. Denison case.
It is ironic that we should have to deal with Buck vs. Bell and Dred Scott in the 21st Century.  It is too bad that America cannot free its senior citizens from the yoke of Farenga, Stern, Schmiedel, Solo etc.
Ken Ditkowsky

1 thought on “Why did they disQ my attorney, again?

  1. Solo stripped the gold from Gore’s teeth? Yuck! And this person is still not in jail?

    Thanks for letting us other seniors know what exactly is going on in the Chicago area courts. And remind me never to even visit the region! I still have two gold fillings that I would rather keep.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s