I do not always agree with Justice Posner, and he has not ruled every time in my favor, but, he has integrity. The ABA article is interesting, to wit:
Why did Posner retire? He cites ‘difficulty’ with his colleagues on one issue
POSTED SEPTEMBER 7, 2017, 9:04 AM CDT
Judge Richard Posner had intended to stay on the federal appellate bench until he reached 80, an age he believed to be the upper limit for federal judges.
“I was not getting along with the other judges because I was (and am) very concerned about how the court treats pro se litigants, who I believe deserve a better shake,” Posner said. The issue will be addressed in an upcoming book that will explain his views and those of his colleagues “in considerable detail,” Posner said.
Posner said he did not time his retirement to allow President Donald Trump to appoint his replacement. “I don’t think it’s proper for judges or justices to make their decision to retire depend on whom they think the president will appoint as replacements,” he told the Law Bulletin. With Posner’s retirement, the 7th Circuit has four vacancies.
Posner was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, and was widely considered a conservative. He has since written more than 3,300 judicial opinions, and not all please conservatives, according to the Law Bulletin. On the one hand, he struck down the Illinois ban on carrying weapons in public, called for fewer restrictions on domestic surveillance, and limited class certification in class-action lawsuits. But he has also written opinions favoring abortion rights and same-sex marriage.
In a 2012 interview with National Public Radio, Posner said he has become less conservative “since the Republican Party started becoming goofy.” But he won’t remain above the fray in politics.
He told the Law Bulletin that his retirement will allow him to assist his cat, Pixie, in a run for president in 2020. Above the Law had endorsed Pixie last year, but Posner was unable to participate in the campaign.
“I am optimistic that by  the public will be fed up with human presidential candidates, whether named Trump or Clinton,” he told the Law Bulletin.
Currently a senior lecturer in law at the University of Chicago Law School, Posner identified other future pursuits in a statement about his retirement on Friday.
“I am proud to have promoted a pragmatic approach to judging during my time on the court, and to have had the opportunity to apply my view that judicial opinions should be easy to understand and that judges should focus on the right and wrong in every case,” he wrote.
“I look forward to continuing to teach and publish, with a particular focus on social justice reform.”
Posner told the Daily Law Bulletin that he believes his greatest impact was his advocacy for an economic analysis of the law. In an article for Bloomberg View, Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein agreed, calling Posner “probably the world’s most influential legal thinker over the last half-century.”
“Posner’s approach has a deceptively simple starting point: We should focus insistently on the real-world consequences of legal rules,” Sunstein wrot
Anyone who has a reasonable amount of human compassion and has hung around either the Daley Center or 219 South Dearborn would have to agree with Justice Posner–for sure a huge problem in the court system is the treatment of pro se litigants by other judges and the bar.
I’m not even sure that Posner knows the half of it, sitting behind his desk at the 7th circuit court of appeals. But he is right, pro se litigants are treated like dirt, their pleadings are struck , their cases dismissed, they are routinely denigrated and most of it is simply unfair and not justice.
I believe it’s a huge problem.
But you see no committees to protect pro se litigants, or give them any due regard at any bar association, and I bet if I looked at Illinois Supreme Court decisions in the last few years, I bet I see no deference to any of them.
That is a very huge problem.
Subject: The retirement of my favorite judge
Date: Sep 7, 2017 9:43 PM