From Ken Ditkowsky–Ferreting out corruption in the courts

Subject: Re: [JudicialMisconduct] Fwd: Petition to Reinstate Law License and Notice of Claim for Damages against IARDC – Corrected Version
Date: Mar 24, 2017 1:48 PM
Ferreting out corrupt judges is NOT a task for the faint hearted.
With title records now on-line in many jurisdictions it is now relatively easy from the computer literate to find out where a particular judge resides, see how the title to his/her home is listed, and review the various transactions that have been placed of record.    Indeed, it is not that difficult to even ascertain the moderately hidden transactions in the spouse’s or children’s names. However, the task becomes a little more sophisticated when devices such as Land trusts and corporations are used as conduits for extra – circular remunerations.
In the blogs Probate Sharks, MaryGSykes and a bunch of others Janet Phelan’s investigations are chronicled as she unmasked a number of jurists.   Others also have done fantastic work in exposing the criminals in black robes; however,  no device designed by the criminals is exclusive or not available for usage.   In fact that only way to ascertain if the judge hearing your case is ‘wired’ or ‘fixed’ is to observe the Court record, his/her rulings and the final result.    Even then, a really clever jurists can avoid detection.
My baptism came in the Mary Sykes 09 P 4585.    Yes, in my five decades in the practice of law and thousands of files I was well aware of some shady and illegal practices by certain judges that forfeited rights of my clients.   In most of these cases I had to grin and bear it, but in Sykes the attorney for the guardian and the two guardian ad litem tried to intimidate me and stop me for representing my clients.   My wife was shocked by the content of the telephone calls I received from one of the guardian ad litem and the attorney for the guardian.   I laughed the calls off, and made a telephone call for a friend who was a former Federal Special agent.
What I did not realize at the time was the cancer that had become metastatic.   As you are aware the intimidation failed and no one has shut me up as of yet.   What has not happened however is that I have not been successful in 1) obtaining an acceptable result for my clients and other persons similarly situated, and 2) the miscreants who systematically dehumanized Mary Sykes and redistributed her 3 million dollars in life savings to their own accounts have not been forced to return the booty!   In fact these miscreants continue in their dehumanization and redistribution activities almost without interruption. 
It is a given that not one of the miscreants is committing his portion of the 18 USCA 371 conspiracy innocently or as a charity.   From my vantage point even though the State of Illinois is on the verge of Bankruptcy the Illinois Department of Revenue has little, if any, interest in collecting the taxes, interest or penalties that need to be assessed.   The mere call for an HONEST INVESTIGATION however causes the public funds to be drawn upon without limitation so that the miscreants (Political and Judicial elite) are fully protected.
It is given that public figures such as Jerome Larkin, the administrator of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission did not file patently false disciplinary pleadings because he really believes that exposing judicial corruption is akin to “yelling fire in a crowded theater!”    No one believes that Judge Connors ignored the mandatory judicial duties required by 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10 because she never read the statute which she administered for 12 years!   (On page 91 of her evidence deposition she admitted that her decisions were pre-determined i.e. wired – so it was no surprise to obtain a letter from the Sheriff of Cook County that disclosed that no summons was ever served by his office on Mary Sykes).
As we all get old and every individual reading this e-mail could be subjected to the very same elder cleansing as Mary Sykes, Alice Gore, Carolyn Wyman ******  how do we or our loved one know what is in fact happening.    How do we convince Law Enforcement to protect us from the cancer of elder cleansing and the WAR AGAINST THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED that Larkin and his co-conspirators are successfully waging?
In this battle each of us may be called on the fight, the honest political class also has a stake.   The President of the United States – if he desires to actually provide health care to America – must address this cancer.    The theft committed by the Warriors who are promulgating this War against us (the elderly, the potential elderly and the disabled) are well funded and in the case of Philip Esformes stole a billion dollars from the Medicare Program.   In the many other Philip Esformes like case hundreds of billions of dollars have been stolen from the USA.     Private savings of people such as Mary Sykes have also been stolen and not recovered.   Hell – even the gold in your teeth is not safe.
The criminals that we are all fighting are not dumb bunnies too stupid to get out of the rain – they occupy positions of trust and confidence that we pay huge sums in taxes and other remunerations to protect us.    The IARDC which Larkin administers obtains millions of dollars to protect the public from corrupt lawyers; however, when Seth Gillman stole millions of dollars from Hospice care patents (and the government) the IARDC was totally disinterested.   In fact it did not become interested until the ‘word on the street’ revealed that Gillman was co-operating with the United States of America.   Immediately the IARDC under Larkin’s administration sought and obtained from the Illinois Supreme Court an interim suspension of Gillamn’s law license.    
JoAnn Denison exposed corruption in her blog MARYGSYKES and not only did Larkin overtly violate Illinois Law (by hiring a vulnerable and unlicensed court reporter) but he has yet to “fess up” to his action, but has continued in attempting to silence Attorney Denison.
All who fight corruption in the courts had better not be of faint-heart!   Many in the health care industry and in government agencies have vested interests that you are fighting.  They cannot afford honest Courts!   An honest judge would have dismissed the Petition for a Guardianship of Mary Sykes in August 2009 when the petitioner could not obtain a physician to testify that Mary Sykes was incompetent.   As Mary had not been properly served with summons dismissal for want of prosecution would have been appropriate.   But Judge Connors was in the pocket! (see page 91 of her evidence deposition!).    Two guardian ad litem were in the ‘pocket!’   exactly why there had to be two guardian ad litem for an elderly woman who was obvious competent is still a mystery – except that the attorney for the petitioner seeking to be guardian appears to have a bit of clout!.    
JoAnne Denison and I both protested – the protest was not met with favor – the idea of an HONEST INVESTIGATION was so outrageous that hundreds of thousands of dollars of STate of Illinois money was spent to attempt to silence both of us and all those citizens who feel aggreived.
The admission of Justice Maureen Connors is unusual.   Most judges (corrupt and not corrupt) know that the first obligation of a judge is determine if jurisdiction is had.   Connors was aware that she had no jurisdiction – she did not care as she knew she was covered.
It is exactly Connor’s knowledge that her pernicious breach of trust is totally protected that make any real inquiry into just how the remunerations are received by the miscreants at best guesswork or at worse not for public knowledge except by procrustean efforts – some of which might be hazardous.   For this reason we desperately need President Trump to take a lead and direct the Attorney General of the United States to do an HONEST and comprehensive investigation of the elder cleansing that is the ISIS terrorism associated with the WAR ON THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED.

From: kenneth ditkowsky <>

Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [JudicialMisconduct] Fwd: Petition to Reinstate Law License and Notice of Claim for Damages against IARDC – Corrected Version

If anyone needs to be reminded that Jim Crow is alive and well in Illinois, the Lanre Amu case is a clear case.    The record in the Amu case suggests that Amu’s crime was having a dark skin.   This conclusion is bolstered by the outrageous treatment of Diane Nash by the Larkin IARDC conspiracy.    Ms. Nash was barred from a hearing room in which a kangaroo hearing as to JoAnne Denison was being heard.   Ms. Nash (a civil rights icon) was the only person who was not admitted. There was a empty seat right next to me (I was observing and seated right next to Attorney Amu).    I known there was no mistake to the denial of allowing Ms. Nash to attend as I personally wrote the IARDC administrator (by e-mail) and requested an apology to Ms. Nash.   To date not even the usual insincere apology has no been forthcoming.
Mr. Amu’s petition is attached along with the article from Crain’s Chicago Business.    
The maltreatment of Mr. Amu was clearly gross violation of the decency expected by Americans from their government.  Exactly how the United States of America and the State of Illinois can tolerate the outrage that Jerome Larkin and the Illinois judicial system have done to Mr. Amu is a mystery.   How such conduct on the part of public officials can be condoned is also a mystery.
I join with Mr. Amu in demanding an HONEST INVESTIGATION and I go one step further – I demand that if an HONEST INVESTIGATION finds that the allegations of Mr. Amu are accurate that a grand jury be impaneled and that every attorney associated with the prosecution against Mr. Amu who did not speak up against the civil rights violations perpetrated against Mr. Amu be subject to severe professional disciple. There is no place in the Courts of Illinois for racism!    Mr. Larkin in allegedly perpetuating it and JIM CROW has breached his public trust.    (As has every attorney involved in the Amu case!) 

From: ”Lanre O. Amu’ via JudicialMisconduct <>

Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:25 PM
Subject: [JudicialMisconduct] Fwd: Petition to Reinstate Law License and Notice of Claim for Damages against IARDC – Corrected Version

‘Lanre O. Amu, P.E. (Illinois ’89), B.C.E. (U of MN, ’84), M.S.C.E. ( U of MN, ’86 ), M.B.A. (UIC, ’89), J.D. (1995)
0909 301 3007   0815 781 6971
—–Original Message—–
From: ‘Lanre O. Amu <>
To: kgjablonski <>; jjgrogan <>
Sent: Tue, Mar 21, 2017 11:24 pm
Subject: Petition to Reinstate Law License and Notice of Claim for Damages against IARDC – Corrected Version

Attention: IARDC  (Corrected for Typographical errors)


‘Lanre O. Amu, P.E. (Illinois ’89), B.C.E. (U of MN, ’84), M.S.C.E. ( U of MN, ’86 ), M.B.A. (UIC, ’89), J.D. (1995)
0909 301 3007   0815 781 6971

1 thought on “From Ken Ditkowsky–Ferreting out corruption in the courts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s