From Ken–
With political correctness the meaning of words has changed dramatically; however, the acts depicted by the words are much more vivid. For instance, on the MaryGSykes blog the word “gangbanging” is used to describe the atrocity that is now common place in the Circuit Court of Cook County and a number of other courts across the country. Indeed, when I saw the word used in context with the elderly victims of elder cleansing I was a bit shocked as I envisioned that the people protected by Jerome Larkin, and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission had engaged in a new sport – now that the Illinois Supreme Court by dismissing the Rule to Show Cause directed to Jerome Larkin had clearly indicated that Rule of Law did not apply to those who were the elite. It was thus perfectly fine for Larkin to misuse public funds, breach his public trust and make a mockery out the long time mores of the legal profession. (such as correctly citing cases, telling the truth to Court, showing respect to opponents, refraining from filing false pleadings *****).
Indeed, the disgusting image of corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, corrupt guardians appointed by the corrupt judges and those who violate 18 USCA 371 in acting in concert with the miscreants “gangbanging” grandma turned my stomach. I then read the post and discovered an equally disgusting scenario. The National Socialist torture of Alice Gore certain ranks among one of most reprehensible acts in human history! How dare public officials using public funds to prospect for gold in the teeth of a helpless 90 plus year old woman as they were elder cleansing her. This disgusting scenario ipso facto warrants filing a Petition in the International Court of Justice seek remediation for the obscene human rights violation! (It is obvious that the Courts in Illinois are disinterested in providing protection for grandma! And it is obvious that Supreme Court of Illinois is hell bent in protecting those who commit elder cleansing and those who cover-up for it).
Indeed, the saga of Tim Lahrman, Helen Stone, Carolyn Wyman **** and Mary Sykes evokes equally horrendous images of the rape of the Justice System by the very people who are sworn to protect it. Yes, I know that exposing the human rights violations by corrupt judges, corrupt judicial officials and a corrupt system if unethical in the eyes of the Supreme Court of Illinois. However, in the eyes of the core values of America not only is exposing these human rights violations mandatory, but it is also mandatory as a human being to not rest until the criminals who prey on the elderly and the disabled are removed from public office and positions of authority.
The words used to describe the horrors committed by the corrupt judges and their appointed corrupt guardians et al are not really important. The act itself cannot and will not be swept under the rug. Right today we who object to elder cleansing may be ignored, but, those who ignore us may regret the day – as anyone who gets old or infirm can be subject to these cowards and scavengers who prey on the weak, the elderly and the disabled. In fact, the miscreants are more likely to enjoy being gangbanged by a corrupt justice system and impotent public officials who cannot or will not honor their commitment to serve and protect!
With Illinois on the verge of Bankruptcy, would you not think that the Illinois Department of Revenue would be at Jerome Larkin’s door seeking to collect the enormous sums of money that he owes the State of Illinois because of his overt acts in support of elder cleansing! How is he able to get away with his obvious criminal behavior? How are all the corrupt public officials were read about in the daily media able to get immunity for obvious criminal conduct? Indeed, the gang rape of the Constitution by some of our public officials has to STOP right now!
Ken Ditkowsky
From Joanne;
I was fairly shocked when a genuine, born and raised south of Madison Street regular kind of South Sider, explained his experience to me in challenging a corrupt judge, then she “pushed the button” under her desk and he was instantly surrounded by 3 or 4 of the finest bailiffs that Cook County had to offer. He told me he was “gang banged”. Now there is no way to challenge what a South Sider has to say about certain activities and styles of court room management. I do not doubt it when he says this is a gang technique to firmly inform your gang rival that certain behaviors are seriously objectionable and will not be tolerated and you have brought “the gang” to make your point clear.
And I want to further clarify, that he did not threaten the judge or anyone else, he was merely stating his objections for the record; however it appears that certain objections are simply “not allowed” and challenging the court in the arena of clearly fictitious accountings and scurrilous behavior by court appointed persons with Letters of Office and certain clouted attorneys are often tresspassing into verbotten territories, so they must be left alone. And if that means that 3 or 4 of the finest bailiffs have to put their searing hot breath down your neck to make this point clear, so be it.
I also forgot to mention, that an important part of a successful court room “gang bang” is to further instruct the victim, well out of earshot of anyone that might rat them out, that so and so has it in for you and that if you come back, you will likely be arrested.
I just wanted to make those finer points clear. The gang bang by a court judge does not come on the threat by a litigant against person or property of the court–it comes primarily after someone has brought to the court’s attention some aspect of a Fraud on the Court being committed and the judge does not believe this is a proper subject to bring up in the polite, friendly company you find in a courtroom.
Then, the bailiffs are called for a hot neck breathe down.
The final step of a successful gang bang is then where the disgruntled litigant is told out of ear shot of anyone who might rat this process out, that the judge or a clouted attorney has it “in for you” and they intend to have you arrested if you continue to challenge anything and it is best you really not show up again.
I have been told by my dear South Side friend that the technique is extremely effective, and all superfluous courtroom characters often choose wisely to stay away after being courtroom gang banged and they generally comply and curtail any pleadings that might challenge our most efficient courtroom activities of transferring cash from the estate into the hands of needy attorneys, nursing homes, court room vendors, scurrilous parties not mentioned in the will, etc.
I just wanted to make it clear for the record what a proper court room style gang bang consists of.
Of course, Gloria Sykes, who was often surrounded by bailiffs giving her the neck breathe down, just didn’t understand what the court was trying to tell her. Silly her, she kept on filing pleading after pleading in a fruitless attempt to protect her mother over 5 years while 2 gals and a string of clouted attorneys laughed at her and wrote whatever they wanted to in a string of fairly scandalous orders that prohibited her from seeing her mother about 99 per cent of the time, from keeping her mother out of at least 2 nursing homes, from the sale of her homestead, etc. And when things got really bad, Judge Aicha MacCarthy took these issues into her own hands running out the courtroom after Gloria, the robe flying, demanding to have her arrested and Gloria’s service dog “put down” when Shaggy let out a bark in the courtroom hallway.
You just cannot make this stuff up.
Anyway, I believe Gloria filed a JIB complaint and that was fully ignored and then the 7th circuit recently dismissed her ADA complaint over all of this, so you know where sympathies lie within the courtrooms of Cook County, both state and federal.
Personally, I don’t even know why Jerome Larkin and James Grogin went after myself and Ken for producing this blog. I bet he is learning a whole lot of new tactics to put down, confuse and intimidate the public. I mean, after all, covering over outlets in the ARDC hearing rooms to make sure that people don’t bring their laptop and blog is fairly childish. There’s a whole world out there he can learn from this blog. I don’t go to court any longer and blab about everything that is going on and all this interesting stuff, and I know he and his staff don’t either–they have to rely upon what is put on their piddly complaint forms by members of the public who really don’t know much about where the real corruption is, so sometimes I really wonder why he even wanted to shut down me or my blog.
He obviously doesn’t understand the concept of “keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”
Reblogged this on Justice for Everyone Blog.