COINTELPRO News (2016)

I had never heard of this, but of course, I have never been in a gang unless it was a gang of nerds.  However, Mr. GS tells me of the following:  He goes to court, he tells the judge she is corrupt when there are massive irregularities on an accounting.  She does not look at the file, but instead dismisses his comments, strikes pleadings AND pushes a button under her desk.  3 to 4 deputies then come to the courtroom and start breathing down the guy’s neck in an attempt to intimidate him.

He says this is “gang banging”.  Huh. Never knew that, but I know it happens all the time on the 18th floor when a citizen with a valid complaint challenges the judge directly or indirectly.  In any case, I did not know the 18th floor Daley center judges were taking cues from gang tactics.  Thank you Mr. GS.

In any case, I told him to just tell them to go get a Tic Tac and some deodorant and back off.

From the article:

“Gang Stalking” is, very likely, a disinformation term created by
U.S. intelligence agencies. It refers to the intense, long-term, unconstitutional surveillance and harassment of a person who has been designated as a target by someone associated with America’s security industry.

Such operations have nothing to do with criminal gangs. Officialdomestic counterintelligence operations of this type are – apparently – perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, sometimes with the support of state and local law enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are, apparently, perpetrated by private investigators and vigilantes – including many former agents and cops, some of whom are members of the quasi-governmental Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU), sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with connections to the public and private elements of America’s security industry.

The goal of such operations – in the parlance of counterintelligence agents – is “disruption” of the life of an individual deemed to be an enemy (or potential enemy) of clients or members of the security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for this form of harassment would be “counterintelligence stalking.” Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to the process as Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a reference to the severe psychological, social, and financial effects upon the victim). American and British victims have described the process as “no-touch torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime: cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally because it generates minimal forensic evidence.

Tactics include – but are not limited to – slander, blacklisting, “mobbing” (intense, organized harassment in the workplace), “black bag jobs” (residential break-ins), abusive phone calls, computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street theater” (staged physical and verbal interactions with minions of the people who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of bullying.

Does this sound familiar to you?

So why do the courts on the 18th floor and Sheriff Dart’s deputies go and gang bang civil litigants?

We know it’s part of the intimidation in a corrupt case.  I would not think it works, because I am or was a lawyer, but I just heard from someone that he DID stay away from court and lost substantial rights because he was “gang banged” each time he went there and one of the Bailiffs said they were out to get him and arrest him.

Is this North Korea or what?

I am further told by another person that not only was he gang banged by the Bailiffs at the Daley Center 18th floor, but when he went to the Judicial Inquiry Board, someone from the OIG started to “gang stalk” him, where they follow you all the time, take pictures, try to run you off the road and to intimidate you.  He has pictures, but I told him to get a dash cam and go sue them for their “touchless torture.” What  a mess this County is in.

I am told by a woman in Colorado, you can’t even file a complaint against a judge there because you have to do it on a form kept by 2 or 3 clerks, and you have to tell them or write them the complaint and they judge who gets the form.  Of course, certain judges are deemed “too worthy” to put their names on these forms.  I told the investigative reporter she has to go back to the people complaining about this and tell them to sue about this “pattern practice” of denial of due process rights.

Just when you think you’ve heard it all…

And Jerome Larkin and James Grogin, Melissa Smart, Sharon Opryszek, Steven Splitt, etc.  don’t want the public to know their rights either–they are the gatekeepers by oppressing and suppressing this blog to create a new dictatorship in corrupt Illionis worthy of the 3rd Reich or NK.  We need to get rid of these unconstitutional messes instead.

Joanne