I trust you understand that the Political Elite rather than admit that something that they did was wrong, — when caught the aforesaid ‘special people turn on their opposition in an affirmative manner. How dare the great unwashed to be critical of such august personages! Obviously, there is precedent for the actions of the political elite and the procrustean interpretation elicited by ***** is outdated, myopic, a political conspiracy, and a massive right wing conspiracy.
This elitist pattern is evident in the JoAnne Denison kangaroo prosecution by the IARDC. JoAnne caught the elite custodians of the legal professions conscience altering the testimony of Judge Stuart so as to protect the Judge from obvious perjury that was picked up and published by Court watchers. ( For the public to note a sitting judge lying under oath at the encouragement of an attorney employed by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission would be akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater!) Forget the fact that normally subordination of perjury and perjury are serious offenses, but, when the case is wired from start to and including the Supreme Court of Illinois proceedings the perspective is changed. Thus, Larkin and the IARDC can and do get away with serious felonies. Mentioning these facts is grossly unethical and a violation of Lawyer Rule 8.2 and 8.4 according to the Illinois Supreme Court, Jerome Larkin and the judicial elite.
As the charges brought by the IARDC and Larkin were so absurd – i.e. publishing information as to judicial corruptness is not only unethical but akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater – Thus, Ms. Denison and those who defend the First Amendment embarrassed the IARDC, the Judicial elite, the Supreme Court of Illinois and the silent 2nd oldest profession by publishing their ignorant assertions. It was painful to watch the legal profession grin and bear the insult to their intelligence as the kept silent out of fear of retribution. Indeed, some of us were laughing at Larkin, the Supreme Court of Illinois and the 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators as they destroyed their credibility and relevancy.
The beat continued. Larkin, and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators, recognized that their hiring of non-professional court reporters who were not licensed by the State of Illinois were prone to corruption and requests to interpret words and phrases so as to eliminate obstacles like obvious perjury, subordination of perjury and inconvenient admissions. Thus, such individuals and entities were preferred over court reporters who if they engaged in such practices – even in Illinois – could lose their licenses. However a problem existed. The statute prohibited payment for services of the unlicensed court reporters. Larkin, the IARDC and the Illinois Supreme Court are like Hillary Clinton above the law. Ergo, Larkin just dipped into public funds and paid the bills.
Illinois is on the verge of bankruptcy, so real audits might occur (doubtful but now a possibility)and the defalcation by Larkin and this co-conspirators might be noticed. Thus to give the theft of public funds the appearance of legitimacy and to intimidate Attorney Denison, Larkin by one of his lackeys sought to charge the wrongful payments by the IARDC (and Larkin) as costs to Denison. Naturally, if Denison knew of the action she might object, so as Attorney Ethics are an excuse **** Larkin just ignored the notice requirements and appeared ex-parte before the Supreme Court. The award of costs was made and bingo Denison owed another $18,000 to the criminal enterprise known as the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary Commission (IARDC).
Denison objected when she found out about the travesty and the ethically challenged conduct of the Attorney Disciplinary Comuty; however, we are in Illinois and Honor, Integrity, Honesty, and decency are all difficult and foreign words to the Elite Political and Judicial officials. (Hillary Clinton was raised in Park Ridge, Illinois).
Larkin was proud of his gambit and therefore admitted it! The Supreme Court was so used to rubber stamping anything that Larkin wanted it rubber-stamped Larkin’s actions; however, right now there is a mini revolution going on. Brexit was approved in Britain. The FBI did not totally sweep the inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s ‘gross carelessness’ with America’s secrets under the rug and some Republicans were actually upset that Hillary Clinton lied to a congressional committee not once but a number of times. Thus, the Supreme Court did a bit of ledger-domain. We are watching the maneuvering to divert attention, be totally deceitful and not appear disingenuous.
It would be nice to see the Supreme Court of Illinois honor the RULE OF LAW, The Illinois Constitution, the US Constitution and its sworn duty; however, we are in Illinois and Honor, Integrity, Honesty, and decency are all difficult and foreign words to the Elite Political and Judicial officials. (Hillary Clinton was raised in Park Ridge, Illinois).
And it is interesting to note that it has now been since May 24, 2016 a demand has been made on this blog to Jerome Larkin to correct the situation, a grievance was filed against all the attorneys involved by fax on June 8, 2016 (Larkin, Opryszek, Smart, Sang Yul Lee and Ziab Alnaqib) and not a peep has been heard from the five of them. I wonder if Steven Splitt is also involved, as an “ethics” professor at John Marshall, I think he needs to give that one up and turn himself in, primarily because it was during his “Review Board” hearing that my court reporter was not able to set up. He was the ARDC lawyer there, why was she not able to set up? I now have her affidavit.
Of course, there needs to be an investigation, but it seems like the ARDC is fighting the fact their cover ups and misuse of public funds has now been brought to light.
I have not seen an apology from the six of them–Larkin, Opryszek, Smart, Sang Yul Lee and Alnaqib–to set the record straight and turn themelves in for flagrant breaches of ethics.
Just brought to my attention is the following:
18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.