Who are they protecting? Medicare fraud continues–Drugs for the dead

Here is an interesting article on how Medicare is paying for drugs for the dead.

Approximately half the prescriptions were file more than a week after death, costing the taxpayers nearly $200,000!

HHS Inspector General: http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-11-00172.pdf

With this kind of fraud and no apparent apologies on the horizon, there certainly have to be hundreds of prescribers and drug dispensing companies involved that haven’t been investigated or prosecuted.

Who is protecting these people?  Is that the reason why Mr. Larkin is so adamant that attorneys must not run a blog about troubles in the courtroom, troubles in probate and troubles in nursing homes?   I don’t see him going after a single attorney that works for the Suntimes or Trib?  Why a blog that sticks up for individuals who have little or no voice?  For grandma and grandpa having their assets mined and gold teeth mined, and no investigation? (Gore, Sykes).  In Sykes, the probate attorneys and GAL’s actively blocked the nvestigation, and so did the ARDC.  I wanted to serve subpoenas on US Bank and get the records on drilling out the safe deposit box,

Gloria sent me a scathing email last night saying in essence, how could you screw up the basic fact that I never hired Ken Ditkowsky as my attorney, my mother hired him!! She was furious at me, but the fury was misdirected.  We never said that in a brief.  I know very well that Mary talked to Gloria, told her to get Ken Ditkowsky to represent her because he would know what to do.

I told Gloria to chew out the 7th circuit for that inane opinion.  I have never seen anything like it from the 7th circuit.  Basic facts are wrong, there’s no law, just another request to “hush up” the Sykes case. They called blogs, websites, emails and faxes to the authorities to report strings of highly likely felonies “a vendentta.”  Who are these people they do not understand basic first amendment rights and that the blog contains all the evidence needed to support the problems.

The public understands.

Why are subpoenas being blocked?

Why did Judge Stuart prevaricate at my trial and then suddenly retire?

Why did the ARDC and the GAL’s block Gloria’s and my subpeonas that indicated Mary and Gloria’s safe deposit box was drilled and the contents emptied soon after the plenary guardian was appointed and she was never required to inventory the contents?  Why can’t either I or Gloria subpoena her about it to ask her about the contents?  Why can’t we subpoena her bank account records and find out why and how she paid for a lavish wedding?  Why can’t either of us depose Carolyn Toerpe, Fred Toerpe and Kristin Toerpe and ask them about these events and see if the stories match.

Where are the contents of the safe deposit box and why is the 7th circuit been handed erroneous statements of fact which they publish in opinions without case law and statutory law (the Illinois Probate Act was curiously missing).

Everyone in authority in that cottage industry group wants no investigations and thy actively block subpeonas and discovery and the court and the ARDC rubber stamp it.  The public and other attorneys write me all the time and want an investigation.

I want to know why, don’t you.

Now the media and asking questions and serving discovery and subpoenas is somehow “a vendetta” but only in the Sykes case.

The 7th circuit hasn’t explained enough about that decision.  3 Justices were involved:

Chicago used to be famous for voting by dead people.  Now they need drugs?

JoAnne

Leave a comment