From George Mason Law Review
This is an excellent Article on the First Amendment and what medical advise you might give someone.
Now from Ken Ditkowsky:
It is time to call a spade a spade and to address the fact that Mr. Jerome Larkin and others who are associated with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission are openly and notoriously engaged in a ‘cover up’ and are aiding and abetting the WAR ON THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED that allows certain miscreant attorneys and judicial officials to railroad a senior citizen (usually a widow) into a guardianship so as to separate her from her liberty and property. All of this is unfortunately done for the pecuniary benefit of the miscreants. These miscreants no matter how they slice it dissipate the estate and ultimately kill off the victim.
Like Operation Greylord the IARDC is first in line to attempt to silence the disclosure of the criminal behavior; however, today, it appears that some of the IARDC personnel have more than academic interests. The prosecution of JoAnne Denison for operating a blog is so obscene and wrong that the interference has to be deemed intentional. See 18 USCA 371. The IARDC and Mr. Larkin are well aware that 47 USCA 230 prohibits exactly what they are doing, and Article 1 Section 4 of the Illinois Constitution of 197O could not be more offended. Mr. Larkin and the IARDC of course are assaulting the First Amendment, but that they do regularly.
I have attached a law review article that is consistent with the First Amendment cases that I cited in my personal petition for cert addressed to the United States Supreme Court and forwarded a copy to the IARDC and Mr. Larkin in the hope that the IARDC will demonstrate some intellectual honesty and of its own motion dismiss its frivolous proceedings (Rule 137) against Ms. Denison. Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I have copied law enforcement so that they have a copy of this e mail and the law review article – I do not wish to have Mr. Larkin and/or his cohorts in the position wherein they can claim any legal basis for their intentional violation of human and civil rights – thus *****