From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Apr 15, 2014 6:00 AM
To: Marty Prehn , JoAnne Denison , Janet Phelan , NASGA , probate sharks , Eric Holder , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , “foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com” , Cook County States Attorney , Edward Carter , mary wooley state police , Mary Richards , jim , scott evans , mary wooley state police , matt senator kirk
Subject: Re: Respect for the ADA–Americans with Disabilities Act
We are thinking of Q. T. lawsuit and/or a mandamus lawsuit against the Justice Department requiring enforcement of ADA against State Government and in particular to stop these abusive guardianships.
Yesterday we saw the arrogance of Mr. Larkin and the IARDC. It is axiomatic in Federal Court lawsuits that pursuant to FRCP 4 that defendants when notified of the lawsuit cut the red tape and just file their appearances (consent to the jurisdiction).
As you are aware JoAnne has a blog. This blog reports concerning elder cleansing cases and is a forum for everyone to report these horrific cases. In some of the blog reports JoAnne places her intellectual contributions. As is JoAnne’s right she has copyrighted her blog. Mr. Larkin was aware of the Copyright and received the statutory warnings. So wedded to the idea that he is above the law Larkin and the attorneys in the employ of the State of Illinois hired a company and they infringed on the copyright by copying all 1200 pages of the blog. They then used the pages for their parochial purpose in violation of Federal and State law to try to intimidate JoAnne from exercising her First Amendment Right.
As you are aware infringement on copyright and violation of civil rights are serious breaches of the law. Mr. Larkin and the IARDC however feel that they can tap the treasury of the State of Illinois at will in their efforts to aid and abet elder cleansing by our favorite miscreants. An ARDC attorney was thus designated not to protect the public from dishonest attorneys but to use State of Illinois funds to defend Larkin’s efforts to prosecute the war against the elderly and disadvantaged. This IARDC attorney had to be ‘shot down’ by the Judge as she tried to create technicalities (not in the FRCP) designed to make the simple process of notifying the defendant (Rule 4) and placing a burden of voluntary submission to jurisdiction into a procrustean enterprise.
Enforcement of the Laws of the sovereign is the responsibility of the Administration of the STATE/Federal government. This task is undertaken by the Attorney General. It is obvious that there are elements in the Administration of State/Federal government that are waging ‘war’ on the efforts to protect the victims of elder abuse, financial exploitation, and either present or future involuntary assisted suicide.
We have an election coming up. The timing is perfect. An indictment of several of our miscreants (including Larkin) would for a time scare the pants off of the proponents of the War against the elderly and disabled. Like Syria they might have to give up their ‘chemical weapons!’ This would make the drugging of the victims much more difficult and *****.
Tim has been harping on the fact that the Americans with Disabilities Act must be given credence by State Government. Indeed, if the State of Illinois and the judicial branch of Illinois government (probate division) follows the criteria of 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3 (b) there is no problem -HOWEVER there is no profit either. Thus, both the State and the Federal Attorney Generals have a strong incentive to stop the obstruction of justice by executives such as Jerome Larkin.