for questioning Atty Ditkowsky “does he feel sorry for reporting (felonious activities) to the authorities.
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 18, 2013 9:06 AM
To: “email@example.com” , NASGA , Diane Nash , GLORIA SYKES , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , NASGA , GLORIA SYKES , probate sharks , j ditkowsky , Harry Heckert , Eric Holder , “email@example.com” , Kathie Bakken , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “email@example.com” , Chicago Tribune , matt senator kirk , rudy bush , JoAnne Denison , John Howard Wyman , matt senator kirk , Janet Phelan , Cook County States Attorney , “firstname.lastname@example.org” , “email@example.com”
Subject: 18 USCA 4 Concealment of criminal activity
18 USCA 4 states:
“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”
18 U.S.C.A. § 4 (West)
There is absolutely no question that CT removed from Gloria Sykes’ and Mary Sykes’ safety deposition box the contents thereof and did not inventory the same. There is no question that the value of the contents exceeds the threshold so as to make it a felony. There is no question that Attorney CF and Attorney AS did not report the substantial change in the lifestyle of CT after she was appointed guardian of Mary Sykes. (it is now reported that prior CT was insolvent, however today she sports expensive jewelry.) CT has never denied the charges – however AS, CF have without any personal knowledge issued denials.
Gloria, yours truely, JoAnne Denison and many others have reported the alleged felony to law enforcement, the IARDC, etc. The IARDC if it undertakes to prosecute an attorney for reporting pursuant to the duty under 18 USCA 4 it (the IARDC) has an investigative duty. Thus, you are absolutely correct that staff of the IARDC is thwarting 18 USCA 4. (Even Judges and Attorney regulators are not immune to Federal Law and the responsibilities of citizenship). When Gloria first reported to Court and then to IARDC the theft of over a million dollars in gold coins a duty developed in the Court to protect Mary. When Gloria and others reiterated the charges of serious theft, tax evasion etc a duty arose that required an investigation by AS, CF, and PS. When the lack of action against CT was noted and the obvious assaults on Gloria occurred this scenario transformed from a benign complaint to more positive duties. The IARDC for instance had to investigate the attorneys.
The law presumes that government agencies do their jobs. Therefore, the Administrator of the IARDC is presumed to have done an HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation of CF, AS, PS, and the Judges. Thus, the prelude to 18 USCA 4 has been raised and the law (in my opinion) suggests that Mr. Larkin and the IARDC have actual knowledge of all the facts in the Sykes case. The same situation would exist in Wyman, Gore, Tyler, etc.
Yes, Tim I am complying with 18 USCA 4. I’ve sent a copy of this e-mail to the States attorney, Mr. Holder, and the IARDC. The non-inventory of the gold coins and other valuables by CT in my opinion is a felony and thus as we know about it it makes “whoever having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony” us!
Let me take a moment out to wish that we can end Mary Sykes years of torment now and that you and all who receive this e-mail a Happy, Merry and Prosperous Christmas and New Year.