A letter of Thanks from a supporter brave enough to say what we are doing is for the good of all US citizens

Posted on by

From: JoAnne M Denison <jdenison@surfree.com>;
To: Anthony Santiny <a.santiny@yahoo.com>; Atty Ken Ditkowsky <ken@ditkowskylawoffice.com>;
Subject: Re: IARDC punishment of lawyers for exercizing their First Amendment Right to complaint about Judicial corruption
Sent: Wed, May 22, 2013 7:28:31 PM

From: Anthony Santiny
Sent: May 22, 2013 2:20 PM
To: kenneth ditkowsky , JoAnne M Denison , Larry Chambers , Janet Phelan , Atty Amu ‘Lanu — honest atty oppressed by ARDC
Cc: NASGA , probate sharks , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , “matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov” , Eric Holder
Subject: Re: IARDC punishment of lawyers for exercising their First Amendment Right to complain about Judicial corruption

   Dear fellow U.S. taxpayers,
    I find that the actions taken by the IARDC against Mr. Ditkowsky are absolutely without merit and deplorable in the extreme! I have known Mr. Ditkowsky for more than 10 years and he has always exhibited the highest moral character in representing his clients. As a former corporate executive, Mr. Ditkowsky assisted me in winning a case against a large Chicago insurance company. He fought their army of lawyers and took the moral high ground, rallying the arbitration court to our side. My respect for Mr. Ditkowsky grew further when he represented me in a breach of contract case against former partners who without fear of repercussion unilaterally usurped company assets and funneled them into their own private bank accounts–without so much as paying a dime in taxes to the IRS! Because their acts ruined me financially, Mr. Ditkowsky has continued to this day, to represent me; although he knows I do not have the money to pay his legal fees. He has done this because he cannot stand idly by while “miscreants” take advantage of honest citizens. Such also is the case of Mary Sykes.

I have been following the Sykes case for more than a year. When judges simply look the other way, allowing dishonest people to take advantage of the elderly and infirm, I get angry. As an inter-cultural trainer, I teach other nationalities about American traditions; mostly related to business, but the rule of law is a favorite topic of discussion. Once upon a time our forefathers believed in it fervently. Protecting American citizens’ right to private property and taxation without representation were rallying cries that galvanized Americans to take up arms against terrible odds. It is this idealism that took root and flourished in America that still inspires people around the world. When we cannot rely on our justice system to protect and preserve our rights, then we are no better than the countries that starve their citizenry to enrich corrupt officials. There are many such countries and their politicians hate what we stand for. When an honest citizen like Mary Sykes is cast aside in favor of a favor, then we have lost our way as a nation, as a community, and as a shining example of democracy.

I attest to Mr. Ditkowsky’s moral character and his skills as an honest and faithful practitioner of law. When the IARDC casts out a champion of the people, then it has done its members, the taxpayers, and our elected and appointed officials a grave disservice. As my grandmother used to say, “shame on you.”

Anthony Santiny
U.S. citizen


From KDD:

 

It is time that an HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation go forth and we find out how Mary Sykes could be secretly found to be incompetent, jurisdictional requirements are ignored, and how she and other seniors are openly and notoriously deprived of their liberty and property rights and no one in authority appears to be interested.    It also will be interesting to have ‘daylight’ shine on the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission and how come they are not interested in prosecuting miscreants who aided and abetted in the abrogation of Mary Sykes (and others) liberty and property rights but they are gung ho in prosecuting and suspending the licenses of attorneys who exercise their First Amendment Rights and their Himmel Responsibilities.
In the Mary Sykes case a million dollars in Au coins was not inventoried!     Were the taxes paid.    In the Alice Gore case – in addition to the removal of her teeth – her 1.5 million dollar estate was dissipated.    Was the Au and Ag in her teeth inventoried and were taxes paid?
Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

7 thoughts on “A letter of Thanks from a supporter brave enough to say what we are doing is for the good of all US citizens”

    • AS would be far more believable if he and KDD were not using AS’s wife’s name to sue for more than $17 million dollars while also claiming that AS’s 13th amendment rights were being violated (that would be the slavery act).

      Reply ↓

      • That’s the craziest thing I ever heard. Do you have case number for that? Never heard of that. I don’t see how anyone could do that. But I will listen if you have some actual documents or pleadings to provide. What I don’t understand is for a long, long time, there have been no adverse or crazy (other than spam) comments received. In the last two days I have received about 4 very strange unidentifiable assertations that really seem out there (like this one) with nothing to back them up. I wonder what is really going on.

      • Thanks for getting this information. But without actual pleadings and a summary, it’s hard for the readers to understand what point(s) you are making. The blog is about bringing truth, integrity, honesty and transparency to the Illinois courts. I would like to say that because you seem to prove my point that computerization is either not a priority with Dorothy Brown, or to protect lawyers and judges, it’s a negative priority, meaning it is more beneficial for them to be able to hide things and play with files. I’m just saying.
        So please traipse down to the court and get copies of pleadings, documents, evidence and transcripts to make your point. A half sheet doesn’t even tell 10% of your story

    • How would you like them delivered – electronically or hard copies? Could I copy and paste them here or do want to see the court stamps? Do you want all the complaints, pleadings, orders, dismissals and misfiled appeals or just the most recent?

      Reply ↓

      • This is your project. You want to make a point. Get some evidence and write up a blurb or synopsis with the point you want to make. It should be about improving the court system–what went wrong and some suggestions on how to fix it. You can just share it with me on GDrive and email me your blurb or post it as a comment yourself. I will provide the pixels. Thanks for helping with the court system.

Leave a comment