So why is Chase now asking for a 60 to 90 day stay to lift the stay in bankruptcy?

Hot off the press:  see the links:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwbmhuZU1GUWtNeFU

if link breaks: cut and paste

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwbmhuZU1GUWtNeFU

Two days ago I went to court and heard Chase earnestly plead with the bankruptcy judge, the hon. Donald Cassling to lift the stay in bankruptcy and allow them to promptly file a foreclosure against Gloria’s home.  Ah, but this judge is experienced, so he set the hearing for a quick date and quick discovery, two week and just a few days to a hearing Chase claims is needed to preserve its rights in foreclosure.  Obviously prompted by the GAL’s with Deborah Soehlig agreeing and encouraging this event.

So what happens next, the very next day they file a Motion to Extend the hearing by 60 to 90 days claiming that’s how long it takes to get one of their own witnesses to court!

Do you think that’s it, or do you think Gloria has some very valid defenses against Chase?

Why did Chase come and break into Gloria’s home, smashing out walls for no apparent reason on both the first and second floors.  They claim (Peter Schmeidel?) someone called them and said the home was abandoned, when it was clearly not abandoned, and that they were “securing the premises.”  Does that involve smashing out walls?  Throwing all of Gloria’s furniture into the snow in the alley in the dead of winter?  Does it involve disabling the security cameras in a detached garage not part of that premises?  I believe the garage belongs to Mary G’s lot and not Glorias.  And what about disabling the security system in the garage and disconnecting the 4 cameras.  How is breaking and entering into a garage and disabling a security system part of “securing a premises.”  Seems to me they wanted to trash the place, scare Gloria and render her homeless hoping she would go away forever.

All good questions.

JoAnne

PS–nonetheless, Chase will assuredly get 60 to 90 days to go to hearing on their request to lift the stay in bankruptcy.  So this is a great time to ask Chase, Peter Schmeidel and anyone involved with Chase the above questions in interrogatories, requests for document and requests for admissions so the matter can properly go to trial.  I know I have 33 questions I would like to ask Chase and it’s puppet Peter Schmeidel and I would like to ask the GAL’s what part, if any, they had in all of this.

1 thought on “So why is Chase now asking for a 60 to 90 day stay to lift the stay in bankruptcy?

  1. Again, the garage is owned, used and occupied by me and me alone! Suffice, Chase doesn’t own the loan on my home… they can’t foreclose. This was all at the invitation of Peter Schmiedel as he filed an amended petition to partition my home, including Chase and summoned Chase and there’s to be a proceeding in Probate on July 6, 2012 to finalize the partitioning of my home (I’ve never been served) giving all the equity — about $150,000 to Carolyn Toerpe to pay for the services of Peter Schmiedel, Deborah Jo Soehlig, et al, for getting rid of me, causing me to be a pauper, homeless, and ****. FYI neither attorney James Popjoy or Debora Jo Soehlig have standing in the BK court and should be sanctioned! But then, their ambush worked in the past in the Bankruptcy court, as it did in the Forcible Entry and Detainer. “Confuse the Court” and “Make Gloria look bad”. Yep, had a judge who knows and practices the laws. What a concept!! The garage is owned, used and maintained by me and only me: Chase, however, under the instructions of attorney Peter Schmiedel, thought they would get away with all of this. I’ll be damned if I allow anybody to take my money, my home, all my possessions and get away with it!

Leave a comment