This afternoon we filed with the Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission a Notice to produce documents and the 3rd wave of Requests to Admit.
The first set of Requests to admit evoked an evasion of the Requests. However, by the attempt to avoid responding to the very facts that the ARDC will have to prove to be incorrect in order to prove me a liar, the ARDC admitted that they did not investigation. The horn book law is as foolows:
Rule 216 rule requires absolute good faith and truthfulness in a response, and any responses which seek to evade answering will not be countenanced.2 The answering party is required to ascertain the truth of the request if the ability to do so is reasonably within its power. 10 Ill. Prac., Civil Discovery § 16:21 (2011)
In order to brand me as a liar, even the ARDC has to meet some objective standard – not investigating and relying upon the political elite and their cronies is not sufficient unless the double standard is more overt that previously. Some of you have expressed the view that the ARDC is wired. As every word that I wrote is confirmed by my investigation, the affidavit of Gloria Sykes, the affidavit of Scott Evans, and/or the verified ADA complaint filed in the United States of America and reconfirmed in the transcripts of the proceedings in open Court it is clearly disingenious for the Requests to Admint not to be admitted.
This afternoon I requested that the ARDC join with me in requesting the States Attorney of Cook County to investigate the charges, allegations and avements made in the Sykes case. In particular starting with square one: where are the Sodini notices and proofs of service? They are not in the Court file and Mr.Schmiedel has admitted that they do not exist. As the Sodini notices were not served it is apparent that no jurisdiction exists – ergo Count 2 fails as Stern/Farenga are not properly appointed and acting at best in a defacto manner.
EAch allegation that has been made can be similarly verified in the Court record, transcripts or in other documentation. The safety deposit box that was at the Pullman Bank was in the name of Gloria Sykes and Mary Sykes. Carolyn Sykes had it drilled. The Bank is required to keep records! How could Carolyn Sykes accomplish this feat! A simple investigation will disclose this fact. The inconvenient truth is obvious! Where were the guardian ad litem? Where is law enforcement?
The list goes on and one. At some point in time law enforcement will have to investigate – it might just as well be now!
Although this is obvious, no person in this blog has been accused of any wrongdoing, crime or even arrested unless stated otherwise from a website reporting actual arrests and convictions. We are stating our opinions and we have the right to do this. Only the particular author is responsible for his or her content. (So don’t blame me if you dislike some posts from someone else. This site is newsworthy because it is picked up automatically by many other blogs and is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Illinois State Constitution and violations will be taken seriously with charges under the Illinois Citizens Participation Act. We ARE participating in government here–we are lawyers trying to make a difference to make things better for grandma and grandpa. We don’t care how much money you’re making–directly or indirectly from Probate or a nursing home or home health care wired-in business. Do yourself a favor and get a different job, it’s not worth it. And if you’re someone filing ARDC complaints against this blog, we are all exercising our rights to disseminate important news to protect the rights of the elderly and respect their wishes. Again, go get another job–it’s not worth it.
PS – This blog is primarily for entertainment purposes only and please don’t file any pleadings or documents in court without checking with the sources for errors. My rate to review is $300 per hour. Sorry, but portions of this blog have to be entertaining so we can get the word out. There is most certainly a great deal of (stinging) truth in it, esp. for the GAL’s, the probate court and a society that ignores (thereby condoning) the sleazy world of probate, and in particular the 18th floor of the Daley Center in Chicago, but everyone needs to understand, these are not pleadings, there is no Motion, Response and Reply set by any court, together with extended legal argument recorded by a court reporter and subject to a Motion to Reconsider if errors or new evidence is found. So don’t take it that way. Like a good reporter, do your own due diligence and check with the sources first. Honestly, I have to explain blogs to attorneys? Have they no life? Do they not know how to email me or use the “comments” section at all?