Here is a link to the petition: https://chng.it/5wVvdNpVM2

Our attornment with the breakdown in the concept of EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW, or the misuse by government directly or indirectly of the Rule of Law is relevant only if we allow the propaganda to deter us from demanding the tradition of Equal protection under the law be unabated.What we are observing in today’s Justice System is a total breakdown.    How can FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE be tolerated?  How can law enforcement be silent – and more important how can our elected officials treat this scandal with such benign neglect!    How can the Courts take affirmative action to facilitate this corruption?  Why have me and thee not done something!     The parallel at the highest levels of our government is a grim and stark reminder of the middle 1930’s and the cold war!    This distinction is it is happening here and now.It is frustrating to be helpless as leaf in ocean as the hurricane of corruption rages!  The Lanre Amu IARDC fiasco grinds more than a bit.Amu is a lawyer.  He also has a bunch of degrees in other disciplines, but they are relevant only in that the degree of official public dislike for him (we call it jealousy) is enhanced.   He is endowed with a very dark hue to his skin (as he his African) and with a naive sense that if you do right, you will be treated right and Justice will prevail.  Unfortunately, Amu ran across a Chicago Judge who had clout, and a defendant appearing in her courtroom had some special attributes.   It seemed that the Judge was on the defendant’s board of directors and her brother was an attorney for the said defendant.    To Amu this proposition seemed unfair, and he has been reported to have complained about the situation. The complaint to the IARDC (Disciplinary Commission) was not well received and Amu was accused of lying to the Commission.    A kangaroo court was convened. It heard the director of the IARDC label Amu’s complaint to be a vicious untruth, and he was suspended from the Practice of Law.   Of course the legal profession accepted the result. Fortuitously, CRAINS CHICAGO BUSINESS independently investigated the Judge and was appalled to find the same facts reported by Amu.  Naturally this being our Justice system here in Illinois the RULE OF “DO NOT CONFUSE ME WITH THE FACTS, I’M MADE UP MY MIND” was operative the Amu remains suspended from the Practice of Law. Key – you know that I’m in 1958 graduated from a small Baptist college on the South Side of Chicago – the University of Chicago – and was indoctrinated with the credo of when you can say something nice about someone – do so!    Let me then tell you about JoAnne Denison’s foray with Dean Sallas.   As you know Sallas is a year younger than yours truly, and suffers from many of the same technological deficiencies that I exhibit.  Thus ZOOM is a mystery and attending Zoom proceedings is not automatic.     JoAnne Denison is reported to have besides her JD an engineering degree! Thus, when Covit hit, and Courts continued to operate pursuant to Zoom,  Ms. Denison did not turn Sallas away when he asked for help in connecting to Zoom, she assisted him.    It appears that CHARLES P. GOLBERT and/or one of his attorneys was enraged at Ms. Denison now determined unethical behavior.   How dare she in deed defend the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution!   Everyone knows that in Illinois aiding a victim of a officially approved FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE crime is ethically challenged and even ‘form does not trump substance!’  AN ETHICS COMPLAINT WAS FILED BY THE COOK COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN against Ms. Attorney Denison. You probably do not realize how serious an offense it is in Illinois to aid and abet a victim of FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE to evade the consequences of being vulnerable and have resources coveted by the Court approved predators!    Immediately, the IARDC subpoenaed the GOOGLE account of Mr. Sallas and dispatched a “TRIAL ATTORNEY” to “investigate Ms. Denison” and take her deposition. During the deposition, Ms. Denison expressed her utter dismay that the ARDC continues to cover up corruption, dismiss valid complaints against attorneys who lie cheat and steal from their clients, and told the ARDC under no circumstances would she ever attorn to their corruption. The ARDC refuses to provide a copy of the video tape of this deposition to Ms. Denison, despite the fact she specifically requested it. 

To its credit, the IARDC did not charge Ms. Denison with any additional ethical violations.   (Previously Mrs. Denison was charged with exerting her 1st Amendment Rights and not comporting with the unpublished (and denied) censorship edits of the undisclosed political figures protecting dishonesty and corruption in the Courts.   She maintained a blog and refused to report on the blog the ‘party line!’    She received a suspension of her law license. The ARDC does not tolerate honest Attorney blogs that reveal court corruption and favors and they only promote special deals in the courtroom.

By a separate cover I received a generic petition to be signed people seeking to prevent travesties

 such as occurred to Amu and Denison.    It will not be favored, but if you wish to sign it, I’m certain I can get someone to sent it to you.   (As to computer stuff I’m an ignoramus, so do not expect me to forward it – My skills are so well known that I understand that Auto Dealers have been warned NOT TO SELL ME a Tesla, or any of EV’s ****!)

Ken Ditkowsky