he Isolation of the Elder Cleansing victim from family, friends, and past life.
As Florida victim’s families are writing their affidavits that will be submitted to law enforcement as complaints against an assorted group of corrupt judges, their appointees, various lawyers, and those who had and are currently aiding and abetting the felonies associated with elder cleansing, the excuses that are advanced to curtail social intercourse between the families and the designated victims.
The common trend is to suggest that there is an interference with the ‘order’ of things by the family members who protest the isolation, the usurpation of the liberty and property Constitutional Rights of victim and family, and the studied and systematic deprivations of the victim to hasten death. In each case wherein ‘elder cleansings’ are the goal of the miscreants guardian makes some form of application to the Court to bar or punish the vocal protesting family member. Retaliation for protest is swift for not only the protester but the victim as well.
The Statutory authorization for guardianship recognizes that guardianship is not benign, but an active intrusion on the core Rights of American citizenship of a targeted elderly or disabled person. The guardian is thusly delegated only those rights which are absolutely necessary to reasonably accommodate the deficiencies that the disability has created in the ward. In this regard the Court is only able to obtain jurisdiction when and if a petitioner who alleges a disability can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the ward has a disabling disability that needs reasonable accommodation as a starting point. The petitioner must prove the disability and its extent and nature. Then and only then can to court determine who, if anyone, should address the disability and manner in which it is to be addressed.
Corrupt Judges and their appointees regularly ignore the Constitutional protections afforded by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment and ravage the estate with generous remunerations for a host of appointees and their attorneys. In Illinois a guardian ad litem is appointed ostensibly to be the eyes and ears of the Court. In the Sykes case Cynthia Farenga and Adam Stern were appointed. They refused to report to the Court a large number of emergency room trips by Mary Sykes including one that the plenary guardian admitted was caused by neglect. In point of fact it is fair to suggest that they and Attorney Peter Schmiedel acted as a cadre of attorneys for the plenary guardian. In an effort to prevent me from investigating the Sykes case they filed a Sanction Petition against me knowing that the Court had no jurisdiction over me. The corrupt judge entered the sanction finding against having actual knowledge of a lack of jurisdiction. (I had to address the matter before the Appellate Court of Illinois to vacate the sanction). In the Gore case, Guardian ad Litem Miriam Solo has been accused of orchestrating the appointment of a plenary guardian who was herself disabled and had a guardian appointed for herself. (Gore is the case in which 1.5 million dollars disappeared and Mrs. Gore’s teeth were prospected for their Gold filings.)
The key in just about every case is the isolation of the elderly and/or disabled victim from their prior lives. The most common excuse accepted by the Court for this act of abuse is that certain protesting members of the victims’ family are agitating the disabled and elderly victim. The Court then in horror enters orders that restrict contact between the loving family and the elderly or disabled victim. Thus, when a Barbara Stone observed the horror that had befallen her mother she was ripe to be charged with bogus criminal conduct that the Court knew or should have known was not only a violation of Federal and State law, but a crime against humanity. Cynthia Farenga complained that Mary Sykes was agitated after talking to her younger daughter. Similarly, excuses were found of a similar nature to prevent Mary’s younger siblings from even having telephone contact. Ditto in the Gore case and hundreds (if not thousands) of others.
Agitation of the elderly or disabled victim is an interesting concept. Why would an elderly or disabled person not be agitated by being separated from his/her family, friends and prior life? The elderly person might have a bit of a hearing loss and even a bit of memory loss, but, to lose one’s freedom and be subject to the whim and caprice of a 3 rd person is quite a devastating situation. Reasonable accommodation for a hearing loss is not appointment to two guardian ad litem, a plenary guardian, and rape of the estate and the incarceration of the elderly person – it is a hearing aid!
A basic concept of human existence is “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Thus, it is not unusual that medications have side effects. One of the most common side effects is a malady that interferes with some prior activity. Pain, memory loss, and other intrusive side effects are all together more common to the aging population. It is indeed an agitating event to recognize that you lost your freedom because you took a prescribed medication and the cure is worse than the disease.
To give you an example of the side effects work. Several decades ago, I had a corneal transplant. To ward off rejection I was given a commonly used medication. Among the side effects listed on the label of the medication was manic behavior. Another was Depressive behavior. For about a month the drug had no visible side effects and then very manic behavior set in. I was happy as lark! Pollyanna had nothing on me; however, without warning and extremely suddenly I woke up one morning thinking of suicide. Fortunately for me I recognized that something was wrong and got off the medication. The termination of the medication restored me to the equilibrium that I enjoyed prior. Had I not been shocked by the fact that I had an episode that was foreign to me – such could have been an excuse to elder cleanse me. You can bet your bottom dollar I would have been agitated!
Nevertheless the corrupt judges are ignoring the facts and in most cases not holding the type of hearings that are necessary to determine if 1) there is a disability that needs attention and 2) the extent and nature of the disability. It is tragic that there are judges who are so corrupt that they do not take their responsibilities seriously due either to incompetence or unauthorized remuneration. It is tragic that these judges appoint as guardians their cronies to positions that inherently deprive the elderly and the disabled of their constitutionally guaranteed rights, privileges and immunities for profit. It is even more tragic that there are lawyer disciplinary groups such as the Illinois Attorney Registration and Distortion Commission administered by Jerome Larkin that openly and notoriously obstruct justice, aid and abet, and act in concert with the miscreants in the quest for pecuniary wealth of the elderly and disabled. It is tragic that health care funds are being stolen from Medicaid, Medicare and other State and Federal programs by these individuals.
The Holocaust directed at the elderly and the disabled cannot be effective if the Court enforce the Constitutional limitations on guardianship and the directives of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The facade created by the disreputable for profit guardians and their corrupt fellows of needing to isolate the elderly and the disabled because family agitates the victim has to be addressed as a ‘red flag!’ depicting the discrimination of elder cleansing.
Ken Ditkowsky
MaryGSykes.com 