Dr. Cordero,

I agree that every effort should be expended to expose corrupt judicial officials, and especially those judges who are corrupt because they have not educated themselves to the law and/or are ‘wired!’

The one fear that I have is the throwing the baby out with the bathwater.   Fortuitously we have a large cadre of excellent judges as well as too many judges who lack the competence to practice law, but nevertheless do through clout have a position on the bench.    We also have a cadre of judges who have flexible moral consciences.   Then again we have reform that works for the blink of the eye and them vegetates back to its own corrupt self.

A second fear is that the campaign exposes judges who are honest and just to not agree with the poetically correct and/or politically correct position.  Similarly, we want to protect the judges who have a different interpretation of the law than is accepted, and also the judge who is honest, but is just damn wrong.    Simply put our friend is the honest independent free thinking  jurist.

As no war has ever been won without someone taking the first step, I applaud  your efforts and support them.    I’ve copied Mrs. Cooper who has a program on a citizen band that I’ve appeared on several times.   Mrs. Cooper has been campaigning for honest government and an honest judiciary for decades. (more than two)   Ms. Denison, NASGA, probate sharks et al have been exposing corruption in the Judicial branch in their Blogs almost daily.

Exposing Judicial corruption of individual judges is not enough.  Yes, it is a full time job, and yes getting to square one is like swimming the English Channel without a safety boat,   However, the primary tumor of this metastatic tumor has to be removed as well.    That means eliminating the self righteous predators who aid and abet the corruption.   In Illinois we have Jerome Larkin and his band of over-paid lawyers who mimic his assaults on our American Bill of Rights.  Do you realize that Larkin is so bold and so enabled that he has made established the mafia principle that it is more ethically challenged to report pursuant to 18 USCA 4 felonies against the elderly and the disabled than to commit the felonies.    (Think about that one for a while!)

Unfortunately Larkin has not stopped with being a co-conspirator, an accessory during the fact, or just aiding the abetting.    Knowing of State and Federal statutes that prohibit interference with free speech, in direct violation of 47 USCA 230 Larkin is prosecuting under color of law JoAnne Denison for running a blog that he does not agree with!   (The US District Court dismissed the law suit under 42 USCA 1983 for not stating a claim)