—–Original Message—–
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Sep 16, 2014 11:07 PM
To: “J. Ditkowsky” , “JoAnne M. Denison”
Cc: Harry Heckert , Probate Sharks , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Janet Phelan , Chicago FBI , Chicago Tribune , “FBI- ( (” , SUNTIMES , BILL DITKOWSKY , Ginny Johnson , Illinois ARDC , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , “Y. ACLU” , “Foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242 (” , Scott Evans , Bev Cooper , Edward Carter , Diane Nash , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Cook County States Attorney , “Chicagotonight (” , Fiduciary Watch , Human Rights Watch , “tips@cbschicago.com” , Barbara Stone , “Mr. Lanre Amu — Honest Atty Unfairly Persecuted By ARDC” , The Wall Street Journal , “Jim (” , Sam Sugar , 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Cook Sheriff , Martin Kozak , Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik , Martha Jantho , Eric Blair , Len Holland , “JoAnne M. Denison” , Rudy Bush , “illinoislawyernow@isba.org” , Elaine Renoire , Alyece Russell , Kathie Bakken , ACLU of Illinois , “information@iardc.org” , Glenda Martinez , “Truthbetoldradio (” , Tom Fields , RosANNa Miller , Nancy Vallone , John Howard Wyman
Subject:
Today’s talk at the Northshore senior center had a dividend that I did not plan and did not anticipate.
As you know I have been suggesting that judicial corruption includes the situation in which a Judge is uninformed as to basic or core values. Judge Connors in her evidence deposition illustrated the point when therein she demonstrated she had in fact never read the very act that she was administrating and which had an enormous effect on the lives of countless seniors. I was discussing this type of situation and during the question and answer session a former Judge had the temerity to explain to me that a defendant can waive his or her personal jurisdiction. Of course it can be, but not by an alleged incompetent. No said the former judge – “ the guardian ad litem can waive jurisdiction!”
As we had an intelligent audience they were shocked! This is basic! If you are going to declare someone incompetent you have to protect their rights. This means that actual service of process along with a copy of the complaint not only has to be accomplished, but a surrogate who has the interest of the alleged incompetent also has to be give prior notice. Our Illinois Supreme Court and appellate court have both pointed out this prior 3 rd party notice is jurisdictional! [See, In re Soldini and In re Seinfeld]/
The foregoing is Constitution 101. The pre-teens who have to pass their Constitution test to go to high school have to know this fact – HOWEVER judges who are highly paid (as well as lawyers and lawyer regulators ) who we have encountered in relation to these cases, all appear ignorant of America’s core values.
Exactly how does a society survive when those persons who are charged with administrating the law lack a clue as to what it is, where to find it, and its basis. It is no wonder that the public has no respect for the judicial system and the lawyers who are in charge.
Ken Ditkowsky
MaryGSykes.com 
Do you folks sense that with the heated oral argument in the Edmond’s case between Jerome Larkins and the Supreme Court when taken together with Karavitasthat the Court has received your messages and and and now gets it as to what has been going for years.Iif so do you think it is now cleaning up the ACT from its end?
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:20 AM, MaryGSykes.com wrote:
> jmdenison posted: “