okay to publish I assume?  Well done.  What I say and you say about a case we’re not appearing on is none of the IARDC’s business.  and if you want to announce it to the world you’re investigating the lack of service upon Mary, then you should be applauded and not made a pariah.

thanks

joanne

—–Original Message—–
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 8, 2013 4:58 AM
To: JoAnne M Denison , Atty Ken Ditkowsky
Subject: Re: And I don’t care if the ladies at the ARDC are intelligence challenged

A bad complaint results in a bad answer.    The complaint filed by the IARDC concerning you (and me) has uncorrected several problems.  1) the complaint is meritless.    Pursuant to Citizen’s United it is now an absolute that no government agency (including the IARDC) has the authority to regulate citizen based speech.   A citizen, including a quasi citizen such as a corporation, has an absolute to be critical of government officials including the President of the United States.    Thus, the authorship of a ‘blog’ being critical of a public official such as Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel, or Adam Stern is not within the mission statement of the IARDC to regulate.   2) The Congress of the United States provided Statutory protection in 74  USCA 230 for the author of the blog and the blog itself.   3) The Congress of the United States provided statutory protection for the author of the blog by the Copyright laws of the United STates of America.    Complying with the dictates of Cynthia Farenga (smoking gun letter) is not an proper usage of copyrighted material.   (see Letter from Cynthia Farenga to IARDc attorney Lea Black requesting aid in stopping call for HONEST investigation of Sykes and similar cases).

I realize how important it is to the IARDC to protect the ability of certain judicial officials to protect the cottage industry created by certain favored lawyers to separate senior citizens from their liberty and property and in particular to prevent dissemination of information concerning the ‘theft’ of over a million dollars in assets from Mary Sykes’ safety deposit box, the dissipation of Alice Gore’s 1.5 million dollar estate and the lack of inventory of the gold fillings that we removed from her teeth, etc.    However, the governmental priorities of the IARDC (and its administrator) of aiding and abetting the separation of selected senior citizens from their families, friends, liberty, and property has run into the RULE OF LAW and the ethical and moral problem expressed by the words and phrases of the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Lawyers who do not recognize the RULE OF LAW and terrorists who strike at the core of America!    I’ve copied Senator Kirk’s office and General Holder as the American Taliban cancer is eating away at our Democracy.     I previously wrote Senator Durbin – his office sent me back a form letter which in words and phrase said he was not interested!    Democracy is not a spectator sport!

Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

okay to publish, I assume, she DOES need a wellness check

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:25 AM, kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:

It is time for another wellness check for Mary Sykes  –  family attempts to locate her and check on her have been un-successful.

Let me make this very clear  – there have been too many instances in which elderly people who are subject to the ‘cottage industry’ of judicially sanction ‘elder cleansing’ have conveniently ‘died.’   The death is followed with a quick cremation and the labeling of the victim’s families as bunch of nuts.   Rudy Bush’s mother (in Colorado) is one of many of those situations.

As the ‘august participants’ of the cottage industry of judicially sanctioned elder cleansing have targeted Mary Sykes and they have prevented her two sisters, her younger daughter, her friends, and family from having telephone, physical or any contact with her we do not intend to assist in the project.    We therefore demand regular welfare checks of Mary Sykes and that the information obtained, if any, be freely available to the public.

Even though it has been ruled by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline commission that it is unethical to write law enforcement or anyone else objecting to the program of ‘elder cleansing’ as a citizen without regret or repentance I want you to know that this is a serious problem and I have copied the office of Senator Mark Kirk and General Eric Holder of this request for a wellness check.

While I do not expect ‘foul play’ in the event that Mary Sykes should pass away, I want it made very clear that she is not be cremated without notification to her family and a full investigation being made.   We have no intention of allowing the ‘deserving promulgators of elder cleansing’ to not account for the approximately a million dollars of uninventoried assets that Ms. Sykes and others have revealed to have been placed in the possession of the plenary guardian.

Thank you for your courtesy and co-operation.

Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

from janet phelan:

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/misfortune-of-inheriting.html

this article shows you how to kill a disabled person, then hide assets and swipe them from the estate.   Thanks, Janet for giving me this link.  I stand behind your investigative reporting sills.