Dear Readers;
Apparently this is what the miscreants have in store for Gloria. As you are aware, there is supposed to be set a hearing on the Partition motion for July 6, 2012 at 2 pm. No one knows if Gloria is participating. The entire Probate matter is without jurisdiction, so Gloria has no obligation. I could not find a summons/affidavit in the Probate file when I looked earlier, and as you all know, having previously published a copy of the Probate file from Mar of 2011 to present, it appears no where in there either.
Ken brings up good points below. So where is the summons and affidavit served upon Gloria for the partition? I believe Chase got a general one and I have seen that. How can they proceed without Gloria. What judge would proceed without a duly filed and sworn to Summons and Affidavit.
Perhaps this explains the recent bizarre behavior of LB allegedly calling up Gloria and being nasty to her AND serving her with a summons for her deposition in the ARDC on July 5, 2012, when Gloria has other plans and will not be available. When Gloria said “no thank you” to that date, LB apparently did not take that well and things got nasty from her. Gloria complained to LB’s superiors in Springfield, and got an apology. Gloria sent numerous other dates.
What did the LB/Farenga party plan? A deposition and the next day the Motion on Partition?
Pretty sneaky. No one know what Gloria is doing about July 6, 2012. I have not seen any summons for any of the court (wired) connected doctors that keep on saying Mary is incompetent despite the videos, despite having passed her driver’s exam in Jan. of 2009.
The miscreants want her declared incompetent back to August of 2008. But how can that be with her passing a written driver’s license exam?
This crazy plot continues. No jurisdiction. Doctors that are paid handsomely for about an hour of work ($950 to one doctor according to CT’s 2011 accounting).
Too bad there are now waaay tooo many people besides Gloria noticing and publishing all the dirty little tricks and secrets of this case.
JoAnne
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jul 2, 2012 4:27 PM
To: JoAnne M Denison , NASGA , probate sharks
Cc: Tim Lahrman NASGA , states attorney , Cook County Sheriff , “Edward C. Carter” , “David (NBC Universal WRC) Silver” , “tips@tribune.com” , SUNTIMES , Joseph Hosey
Subject: escalation of intimidation on Gloria sykes in progress
This afternoon, right after being threatened with contempt of the Supreme Court of Illinois for going on vacation after being served with a subpoena for deposition on June 29th for July 5 (short notice), the three guardians got in the act! Gloria received an e-mail from Cynthia Farenga informing her of a competency hearing on July 6. To comply with Sodini the persons to be notified have to stated in the petition and each has to be notified. The plenary guardian in her petition did neither. This gross act of intimidation just makes my blood boil! Gloria Sykes is a key witness in my disciplinary case and this attempt to intimidate her is clearly violative of my rights (as well as hers) I would suggest to law enforcement that these actions taken together are as close as anyone will get to ‘witness tampering!’ Ms. Sykes is expected to testify that the conclusions of the ARDC in bringing the disciplinary action against me are false and not supported by the facts. By intimidation of Ms. Sykes my meeting the spurious allegations put forth by the two guardian ad litem becomes more difficult, especially before a panel that has denied me interrogatories, limited my Request to Admit, and refused to enforce my Notice to produce documents. Please note – I not complaining or suggesting that I will not have a level playing field. The ‘truth’ is on my side, and unless somehow it is barred by intimidation of my witnesses etc I should win on a field that is at a 45 degree angle against me.
That said, the witness that Ms Farenga intends to put forward is Dr. Shaw. Dr Shaw has never examined Mary Sykes, but has (allegedly) testified previously that it is his opinion that in 2008 Mary was incompetent. As Dr. Shaw knows or should know that immediately prior to the filing of the petition for guardianship Mary passed a written examination administered by the Illinois Secretary of State in my opinion his testimony will or is perjury! The tendering of Dr. Shaw to the Court in my opinion is subordination of perjury.
Pursuant to Himmel, I have an obligation to report this attorney misconduct. I will be doing so this afternoon. My draft letter is as follows:
Ms. Lea Black
Dear Ms. Black,
I do not believe in coincidences and therefore after being informed of the verbal exchanges that you had with Ms. Sykes the receipt of the attached e-mail is most disturbing.
The failure of the plenary guardian to name and serve the close relatives of Mary Sykes is one of the prime protections that keeps an individual from being railroaded by Court order into a situation in which he/she is illegally deprived of his/her liberty and property. The docket and the record in the Sykes case are clear that these statutory protections (which are jurisdictional) have not been complied with. If the ‘ex-post facto’ testimony of Dr. Shaw is intended to now fill the gap and approximately three years late obtain nunc pro tunc jurisdiction the statutory protections are still not be complied with and more seriously it apparently has still not been disclosed to the Court that just prior to the filing of the Petition for guardianship being filed Mary Sykes passed a written examination administered by the Secretary of State. It is therefore my opinion that upon learning of this maneuver I became vested with a Himmel obligation to respectfully suggest that subordination of perjury must be considered as Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel and Cynthia Farenga have knowledge of the fact that a person with dementia does not usually pass written examinations administered by the Illinois Secretary of State. We know what Dr. Stern’s conclusions are going to be!
I also find the timing of Ms. Farenga’s e-mail to Ms. Sykes to be more than a little disturbing. Apparently you had a conversation with Ms. Sykes about noon today, and shortly thereafter, Ms. Farenga is advising Ms. Sykes of a hearing on the 6th of July. I would hate to have to tell you about the paranoia attack I would have if the alleged proceeding were scheduled for the 5th.
The plot thickens as Ms. Sykes indicated to mutual friends that she is hoping to meet with a publisher immediately after the 4th of July. A number of attempts have been made to interfere with Ms. Sykes intellectual property rights. She will address that situation at the time she finds convenient and appropriate.
As the ARDC apparently is disinterested in the actions of Ms. Farenga, Mr. Stern, or any other attorney engaged in the active ***** of Gloria Sykes and Mary Sykes I am copying this letter to the United States Attorney Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. This letter fulfills my Himmel requirement.
I would like to urge the ARDC to examine fully, honestly and completely the Sykes case. The embarrassment created by Greylord should be an incentive.
Yours very truly,
As approximately a million dollars in collectibles has been removed from a safety deposit box at the Pullman Bank (now Chase) and not inventoried everyone who has objected to the ‘cover-up’ has been subjected to harassment of various degrees it seems to me that with substantial State and Federal Taxes due (Breach of Fiduciary relationship is a taxable event) law enforcement should be interested – at least to collect the taxes due.
In any case – I did my duty and the ARDC has been notified. The Department of Justice has also been notified. It is ironic that on the 4th of July we have to be cynical as to the basic institutions of our government! Shame on us!
Ken Ditkowsky
www.ditkowskylawoffice.com
MaryGSykes.com 