Watch COOPER’S CORNER tonight to discuss troubles in the courts!

Dear Readers;

 

I will be on COOPER’S CORNER tonight discussing all the problems in the probate courts and what will happen with the IARDC next week who says that I am lying about the Sykes case and there are no gold coins missing and the court has jurisdiction.

 

Subpoenas have been served and depositions have been taken.

The trial is at 10 am each day Jan 21 to 24, 2014 and the public, of course, is invited.  I will have a blogger there to blog and post each day.

Gloria Sykes and Kathie Bakken, Yolanda Bakken and Scott will be there. The IARDC struck my expert witnesses declaring that each of Bev Cooper, Ken Cooper, Sylvia Rudek, director of Nasga, etc. are not experts in probate blogging and cable shows, which is utterly ridiculous.  I will have them talk about their own cases and how my blog doesn’t lie and is like other blogs they have seen.

 

Come and watch the show, come and comment on the blogs–we still have the First Amendment even if SOME authorities don’t believe that is the case.

And remember, no matter what the IARDC does next week, I am totally here for all of YOU, my beloved PUBLIC and Court abuse victims.  I will NOT abandon you.  Atty Curt Sakarian told me to take down my blog and abandon all of YOU who don’t pay me and many don’t appreciate all I do, but I absolutely refuse to abandon a one of you.

JoAnne

From Rosanna Miller — Fraud on the Court

“Fraud On The Court By An Officer Of The Court” And “Disqualification Of Judges, State and Federal”

1. Who is an “officer of the court”?

A judge is an officer of the court, as well as are all attorneys. A state judge is a state judicial officer, paid by the State to act impartially and lawfully. A federal judge is a federal judicial officer, paid by the federal government to act impartially and lawfully. State and federal attorneys fall into the same general category and must meet the same requirements. A judge is not the court. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill.App.3d 477, 410 N.E.2d 626 (1980).

2. What is “fraud on the court”?

Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the court”. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated “a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final.”

3. What effect does an act of “fraud upon the court” have upon the court proceeding?

“Fraud upon the court” makes void the orders and judgments of that court.
It is also clear and well-settled Illinois law that any attempt to commit “fraud upon the court” vitiates the entire proceeding. The People of the State of Illinois v. Fred E. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354; 192 N.E. 229 (1934) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters applies to judgments as well as to contracts and other transactions.”); Allen F. Moore v. Stanley F. Sievers, 336 Ill. 316; 168 N.E. 259 (1929) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters …”); In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill.App.2d 393 (1962) (“It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything.”); Dunham v. Dunham, 57 Ill.App. 475 (1894), affirmed 162 Ill. 589 (1896); Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 338 Ill.App. 79, 86 N.E.2d 875, 883-4 (1949); Thomas Stasel v. The American Home Security Corporation, 362 Ill. 350; 199 N.E. 798 (1935).
Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed “fraud upon the court”, the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.

4. What causes the “Disqualification of Judges?”

Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (“Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”).
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an “appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) (“The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

“A judge is an officer of the court, as well as are all attorneys. A state judge is a state judicial officer, paid by the State to act impartially and lawfully. A federal judge is a federal judicial officer, paid by the federal government to act impartially and lawfully.”

A judge in a statutory court, while called a judicial officer buy definition is not a true judicial officer. Unlike a common law court created by a section of the state constitution in which true judicial power resides by its own merit, a statutory court exists at the will of the state legislature and are administrative in nature carrying out the sovereign will of its creator upon those people who are not true citizens of the state but which may be citizens of the fed gov via the 14th.

While such judges exercise judicial style powers over fed subjects and the like, constitutionally they are mere admin officers.

Praise to God/Patriotic to the Republic
Rosanna

A must watch video from Gloria–this woman beats the CA system!

Dear Readers;

As you have heard it on this blog, there have been at least a half dozen cases which ran without jurisdiction:  Sykes, Wyman (death was her way out), Gore (ditto), Bedin (wrongfully evicted from hospital), Tyler (death)–in fact, once a petition is filed, death is generally the only way out.  If you ask Sylvia Rudek, director of NASGA, only a handful of people have gotten out of a filed guardianship Petition.  Wyman had the only way–and that is to run.  Carol Wyman, beaten and near death, escaped a locked down Illinois nursing home, called a son and was driven thru the night to Colorado.

Her case is famous, but still ended in the tragedy she could not see her grandchildren or any longer live in Illinois without fear she would be arrested and returned to a locked down nursing facility.

So, here is one (brave) Santa Clara woman that escaped–but the Public Guardian billed (bilked?) her $20,000 after her case was dismissed, watch on:

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=9389661&syndicate=syndicate&section

I guess if you want to avoid guardianship, have a yearly statement of sanity and competency and an RV ready to escape “the authorities.”

Smart woman, brave woman, but see how she cries for all the other probate victims.

 

thanks

joanne

Dangerous Choices – a nursing home survey

Dear Readers;

As many of you have read right here on this blog, I was recently in court when Judge Stuart informed me that there is no caselaw indicating that home placement with a kind, caring relative or friend is preferred over nursing home placement.  That was related to me in the case In re Janie Thomas, 10 P 7666.

While not to burst anyone’s bubble over how grand nursing home placement is, and you have seen wonderful stories right here on this blog and on John Wyman’s blog and on other blogs (www.stopguardianabuse.org) as to such grandeur and elegance – not, here is a wonderful, wonderful report that speaks volumes on the subject.

http://blog.levinperconti.com/Dangerous%20Choices.pdf

provides a wonderful, detailed report on how it is such a very nice idea to make that choice.

Despite the fact you can’t have your own stuff, you stuff gets immediately lost, stolen, destroyed, you live in a one room cell, people like Katherine Spera were never taken out of doors for nearly 3 years, yeah, I get all that.

Sounds like Disney land to me.

But the important part of all of this is under the law, it is not really the choice of the courts or family to make the decision, but it is the decision of the ward or alleged ward herself.  That’s all that counts.  Most people don’t want nursing home placement, if it can all be avoided.  Bad food, bad accommodations and who knows who is living with your or who is on staff.

Joanne

 

Another story of abuse in a nursing home from Garr Sanders

Please pray for this man and his brother.

Greetings All,

Bipolar runs in our family. Our mother was bipolar. Our father retired Lieut. Col. Clarence B. Sanders Jr. lives in Texas. Our mother Elaine Sanders, was living in Mississippi. And Robert’s brother Garr Sanders, myself, has lived in Pennsylvania my entire adult life. My brother Robert Sanders lived alone in Columbia, Missouri; when Robert started experiencing signs of bipolar he sought help. Turns out the help Robert sought for his bipolar disorder illness somehow caught the eye of Connie Hendren, a public administrator in Columbia, Missouri, Boone County. Apparently, and correctly so; Connie Hendren saw Robert as an easy target with all his family out of state Connie Hendren determined it would be easy to deceive Robert’s family. This public administrator Connie Hendren had herself appointed as Robert’s Guardian without telling Robert’s family of the guardianship hearing.   Unknown to me Robert was already under guardianship when Robert started
frantically calling me several time a day every day for a week saying he is being told not to talk to his family and would I please visit him. After many calls from my brother over a weeks time I asked Robert who is telling not to speak with your family? Robert said Connie Hendren and Robert asked me to speak with her. Robert gave me Connie Hendren’s number. I called right away Connie Hendren spoke with me on the phone stating Robert is very sick. You just don’t know how sick he is. I told Connie Hendren, Robert said, he’s being told by you not to speak with his family. Connie Hendren replied, Robert is very sick he doesn’t know what he’s saying. I asked Connie Hendren who are you to my brother? Connie Hendren said, I am Robert’s caseworker. I thanked Connie Hendren for her time; ending the call.  I never heard from my brother again. Robert disappeared. For seven years no one in Roberts family knew where he was or how he was. Our mother Elaine
frequently called Connie Hendren inquiring about Robert’s health and well-being, but Connie Hendren would not speak nicely to our mother. Our mother Elaine, would then call me crying about the harsh treatment she received over the phone by Connie Hendren. Robert’s mother was told to stop bothering Connie Hendren about Robert. Our mother Elaine said, Connie Hendren keeps telling me because of the [HIPPA] law she does not have to reveal Roberts location or any information about his health. I called Connie Hendren and Ms. Hendrens’ responce to me was I am Robert’s guardian and there is nothing you can do about it. And with the [HIPPA] Law in place I can not tell you anything about Robert; she then hung up on me. Our mother Elaine would send gifts to Robert at his last known residence an apartment in Columbia Missouri. Connie Hendren would yell at Elaine stop sending gifts for Robert I will not give them to him stop bothering me. This was said by Connie Hendren to our mother Elaine as well as many other insensitive and mean remarks. The most hurtful thing Connie Hendren repeatedly said to our mother is Robert does not want to have anything to do with you, stop calling me. After many years of this unprofessional and cruel treatment to Elaine, our mother had a complete nervous breakdown. Our mother died in that Mississippi hospital and it was a wrongful death. My Mississippi attorney contacted Connie Hendren so Robert would receive his portion of the settlement. Connie Hendren was so happy to hear of the money she said I can visit Robert in the Hannibal nursing home called Levering. This is how we learned of Robert’s location and that he is living in a nursing home. After the lawsuit money was distributed Connie Hendren [tried] to talk me out of visiting Robert. Connie Hendren even made up stories that Robert has changed a lot and has become violent; throwing a nurse down stairs and hitting a orderly. Knowing my brother I had a hard time believing this, but it did scare me so I called the nursing home and asked if Robert is violent? The on duty nurse said NO Robert is well liked by everyone and Robert has no history of any violence. The day before I was to leave for Missouri when she then denied visitation to me. The governor at that time was Gov. Blunt. I contacted Gov. Blunt’s office and his staff said family should be allowed to visit and they would make some calls for me. By the end of that day with Gov. Blunt staffs help I was able to obtain an email with written permission to visit my brother Robert.  This first day I got into Missouri I went to see Robert. I was shocked to find my brother dressed like a hobo in ragged clothes and unshaven with long hair. Robert unshaven with long hair and in ragged clothes. My brother look like a hobo. During that first visit I asked Robert is there anything you would like? Can I get you anything? The first thing Robert
asked for was adult diapers, specifically Depends. Robert stated, “My medicine causes me to wet my bed. I am refused adult diapers then I am yelled at and punished for having a wet bed”. The next item Robert requested was a toothbrush, then some socks and underwear. Robert said for the past five years I have only had: one toothbrush, one pair of pants that were given to me with holes in them and one leg cut raggedly above the ankle the other pant leg left long, a few T-shirts and two pair of socks and underwear. Robert said, ” I had to beg and beg for shoe laces for my sneakers.  During that week of visiting Robert we used my cell phone to call our father and to call on her grandmother just to say hi hello. Roberts state of mind and proved greatly during that first week I spent with him. I was approached by the nursing home staff and told not to allow Robert to use my cell phone. I was told by nursing home staff if I continue she allow Robert to use my
cell phone I would not be allowed to visit Robert. I also was told by the nursing home staff and by the Guardian Connie Hendren to stop buying Robert clothes, shoes, cigarettes and non perishable foods. Robert had requested Winston cigarettes, and Honey Roasted Peanuts. I was told to ignore Roberts requests.  Just before the end of that first week while visiting with Robert Robert went into a sort of days state of mind with his mouth gaped open drooling then Robert began to uncontrollably shake. After a few moments of this Robert went stiff while still shaking uncontrollably. I called out to someone sitting on a bench to get help. About 5 min. past was no one returning. Finally, nursing home staff showed up in a group of about six or seven staff. They surrounded Robert and didn’t and did nothing to help. Robert continued to be stiff while shaking uncontrollably. A long time past with nothing being done so I asked for them to call the ambulance. I was
told by nursing home staff Robert would be all right there was no need to call an ambulance. Eight more minutes passed and Robert was still unconscious stiff and shaking. Four times I asked for the ambulance to be called and four times the nursing home staff refused acting as if this was no big deal. So I took my cell phone out and said if you’re not going to call then I will. It was at that point the entire nursing home staff present weight into a huddle. I overheard one of them say we better call.  After Robert returned from the hospital I was refused visitation with Robert. The nursing home staff and the Guardian told me I was no longer allowed to visit with my brother and if I come back onto nursing home property I will be arrested for trespassing. The nursing home already had an officer there who then walked me to my vehicle and before leaving the officer told me if I come back I will be arrested.  In 2008, I applied for guardianship of Robert
Allan Sanders my beloved brother. Our father retired Lieut. Col. Sanders drove from Texas to be at the guardianship hearing. Both our father and myself stated under oath that we never received notification of the original guardianship hearing. None of Roberts immediate family were contacted about a guardianship hearing. Not Robert’s mother, not Robert’s father, not Robert’s brother.  Both Robert’s father and Robert’s brother were denied guardianship in 2008. And I would like to mention that the attorney defended the guardian and not the best interest of Robert the Ward paying her. Also I would like to point out that the attorney at Connie Hendren’s side also represents herself as the attorney for the nursing home Robert has been forced to live in, in isolation from family and friends. After losing the guardianship hearing the nursing home and the Guardian allowed me Robert’s brother Garr to visit with Robert. It was told to me by the nursing home
administration that I was being given the privilege of visiting my brother only because I should know by now they and the guardian have all the control and power over Robert. I was also told in the same conversation with nursing home staff administration if I do not keep them happy they will revoke the privilege of visiting my brother Robert and I would never be allowed to see Robert again. I was told keeping them happy consisted of not allowing Robert to use the phone, not buying Robert clothes, or gifts of cigarettes or food or any other item. Also, Robert and I would have to stay near the front desk during our visits so that the nursing home staff can watch and listen to everything we say and do. It was not long after visiting with my brother that he began telling me his teeth hurt, he is in pain; and Robert said, he has not ever seen a dentist while living in the nursing home. Long story short, the guardian told an untruth saying Robert sees a local
dentist every year. Because I wrote to many people outside of the guardian and nursing home about Robert being in pain an appointment was made for Robert. However, the appointment for Robert was not a local or even a dentist office. Robert was taken to St. Louis office was put to sleep and given what I believe to be electroshock and mind control. When Robert returned to the nursing home and I visited him the very next day Robert told me he was hurt so bad he would never ask to see a dentist again. When I asked Robert what they did he replied they put me to sleep and hurt me so bad please don’t ask me go to the dentist again. I asked Robert to show me what they did to his teeth. Robert opened his mouth and I said nothing was done to your teeth. Shortly thereafter I spoke with the nursing home administrator about nothing being done for Robert’s teeth; not even a clean. I was told not to worry about it — it is all good. Under my breath I disagreed. I
asked this matter be looked into further and at that point I was told to gather my things say goodbye to my brother for I will never be allowed to see him again. I did as I was told knowing I would be arrested if I did not. While saying goodbye to Robert I let him know I will never give up trying to help him. Robert reassured me that no matter what happens he will never hurt or kill himself. I believe Robert made this statement because of the fear he has that the nursing home staff is capable of causing a residence death and making it look like suicide.  Five years have passed since that day and I still cannot find someone to help Robert get out of the situation Connie Hendren has put him in. Also I would like known that part of the stipulation Connie made in order for me to be able to visit with Robert is I was never to tell Robert about the money he has. Looking through Robert’s public records I found it documented that Robert has been homeless while
under Connie Hendren’s care. I recall Robert stating he was forced to live in a hotel room with four other men for a long period of time. From Robert’s statements and my observations as well as my experiences with Connie Hendren is obvious to me she’s keeping his money for herself. Robert was not even aware of a clothing allowance, a Christmas allowance, and Robert believed he had no money whatsoever at any point in his acquaintance under Connie Hendren’s thumb. I can tell you true Connie Hendren, herself said to me I am in charge of over 3 million (possibly 7 million I don’t remember the exact amount she stated) from her wards and she answers to no one and does what she likes with it and there’s nothing I can do about it; Connie Hendren then gave a cackling laugh and hung up the phone on me. Also I would like it known Robert’s eyeglasses were taken away from him when he first started living at the nursing home. In the short time I had contact with my brother I was able to see to it he got new eyeglasses. Within a month and a half of having his new eyeglasses Robert told me while he was at lunch leaving the eyeglasses behind in his room when he came back to his room they were mysteriously broken once again. Robert said, without his eyeglasses looking out the window he just sees shadows of people. This further isolates Robert. I have written many affidavits each of which has been sent to Terry Hassler of CCHR Citizens Commission on Human Rights. I would very much like it and I give full permission for you to have Terry Hassler or anyone at CCHR to send you copies of all of the affidavits concerning Robert Sanders.  Having tried to be as brief as I possibly can concerning the health and well-being of Robert Sanders and his story of being kidnapped and locked away in isolation I must say one thing that I know I have not mentioned in this letter or in my affidavits. Robert during the first week I visited him told me he has been raped by nursing home staff. Now I know because of the fear Robert has of retaliation he will never admit to abuse, and neglect, isolation, and rape. Even during that first week visiting Robert he was told to get rid of me or I would be hurt. Robert said to me I want you to go back to Pennsylvania and forget about me I am worried for your safety. I said to Robert they don’t know how tenacious I can be I won’t give up trying to help you. Robert said, please don’t feel you have to do this. I said to Robert, all I do is help other people and most of them don’t even appreciate it. I would rather help you Rob, someone I love and someone I know would not take advantage of me or try and hurt me in some way. 

It is my belief that Robert was nearly beaten to death by a staff member of Levering nursing home. I believe my brother Robert was beaten because I had gone to the local paper to ask that they do a human interest story on Robert and the woman at the paper told me she was resonantly told a resident of Levering nursing home has been nearly beaten to death by a staff member. The local paper woman even went so far as to tell me she has picture of the man, but I was not shown the pictures or told the names of the people involved at Levering. I went home and called our aunt Konnie Jo in Mississippi and asked her to call Levering because I am worried about Robert. Konnie Jo called me back and said that Levering told her Robert is in the hospital and they would not say why he had to go to the hospital. made some calls to find Robert, but he was not at the local hospital. I finally found out Robert was in a hospital in St. Luis, Missouri, but no one would tell me how Robert was or anything else other then he was there. After telling our aunt about Robert being in St. Luis hospital she said I should go back to the local paper and ask the woman to tell me who was nearly beaten to death it may be my brother. It was late in the day and the paper office was closed so I went back the very next day. The local paper woman told me she never said such a thing. I said I was hear yesterday and you did tell me that a man was beaten nearly to death at Levering by a staff member. The woman then made up some flimsy story that it was a fight between two people at a half way house, over a girl. I know she was not telling the truth. I feel someone had gotten to her and scared her to shut up. I too have been face to face threatened and hurt very badly by strangers to me in Hannibal over the fact that I have not given up trying to find help for Robert. Being threatened to leave town then being badly hurt has happened more then once to me in Hannibal by people I do not recognize. These attacks have affected my short term memory, and the stress of all this has had damaging affects on my health. However, I will continue to seek help on behalf of my brother Robert because I know he needs help, and because he asked me to help him.

I believe this beating happened to my brother Robert do to the fact that I made so many calls and written complains that someone finally did something and the administrator of Levering nursing home Wintric Williams Jr. was forced to leave Levering. The dismissal of long time administrator Wintric Williams Jr. could have come about do to the medicare fraud I reported. What ever the reason I am sure Wintric Jr. blames Robert and I for the fact that he had to leave Levering. Now Wintric Jr. is running the half way houses his family own in Hannibal. Wintric’s sister gives out the medications to all the halfway houses residents. The Williams family is large and owns many things in Hannibal and throughout Missouri. It was just a few years ago thay incorporated Levering to help hide wrong doings.
Thank you very much for taking the time to read this letter. I very much hope and pray there is something you can do to help free my brother from the clutches of this nursing home and the public administrator his guardian who continues to keep Robert isolated and locked away in Levering. Please bring Robert back to his loving family who will see to it that Robert is in the least restrictive environment, receiving good care, and good help as well as encouragement and love.  


Respectfully,
Garr Sanders
kickdragon7@yahoo.com
267-593-1910
Please note that this is a story in greater detail from http://www.stopguardianabuse.org or NASGA.  you can find more info at http://stopguardianabuse.org/robertsanders.htm
I have asked Mr. Sanders to send my blog regular updates on what he hears about his brother and to continue to try to contact and reach out to him.

A new resource from Alyece Russell–National Whistleblowers.org

Contact Us
National Whistleblowers Center
P.O. Box 25074
Washington, DC 20027
Ph: (202) 342-1903
We do not provide legal advice or referrals over the phone. If you are looking for legal assistance, please contact the National Whistleblower Legal Defense and Education Fund at 202-342-1902 and submit a confidential report.

NWLDEF
P.O. Box 25090
Washington, DC 20027
Any materials submitted to us by mail cannot be returned.

Email
General: contact@whistleblowers.org
Press: mjw@whistleblowers.org

 

I am going to call them today and see what help I can get for myself, Ken and Mr. Amu.  I will keep you posted.